Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />
Pinal County, AZ<br />
Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
NRCS Table 6 - Comparison of NED Benefits <strong>and</strong> Costs<br />
<strong>Powerline</strong> FRS<br />
Apache Junction-Gilbert Watershed, Maricopa <strong>and</strong> Pinal Counties, AZ<br />
(Dollars) 1/<br />
Works of<br />
Improvement<br />
Average<br />
Annual<br />
Benefits (Ag-<br />
Related)<br />
Average<br />
Annual<br />
Benefits (Non<br />
Ag-Related)<br />
Average<br />
Annual<br />
Costs 2/<br />
Benefit/ Cost<br />
Ratio 3/<br />
<strong>Powerline</strong> FRS $0 $0 $1,006,700 0.0 to 1.0<br />
1/ Price Base 2012.<br />
<strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />
2/ From Table 4.<br />
3/ The proposed project will provide an estimated $14,779,300 in average annual equivalent damage reduction benefits. However, as the "no<br />
action" or future without project alternative also provides this same benefit stream, the project does not have a positive incremental NED benefit.<br />
The benefits of the project are tied to reducing the risk of catastrophic failure of the existing structures <strong>and</strong> thus reducing the risk to life <strong>and</strong><br />
property, as described in the plan.<br />
USDA- NRCS Page 8-14 <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />
Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc.
Change language