Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />
Pinal County, AZ<br />
Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
4.3 SOILS<br />
The soils in the majority of the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS watershed are classified by NRCS in hydrologic soil<br />
group (HSG) B <strong>and</strong> D. In the vicinity of the dam the soil is the Mohall loam to Mohall clay loam<br />
association (HSG D). At the higher elevations in the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS watershed the soils are<br />
classified as Gachado-Lomitas-Rock Outcrop to Rock Outcrop (HSG B). The watershed is<br />
approximately 10- 20 percent vegetated with desert scrub on flat terrain to desert trees along wash<br />
corridors.<br />
4.4 SURFACE WATER<br />
The <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS controls runoff from a 47.1 square mile drainage area that lies east of the dam.<br />
The <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS receives surface flows from several major washes including Weeks Wash <strong>and</strong><br />
Siphon Draw Wash. During high flow events the surface water originating from the foothills of the<br />
Superstition Mountains collect at the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS <strong>and</strong> are gradually released to a channel<br />
(<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong>way) located at the south end of the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS. The <strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong>way<br />
discharges to the East Maricopa <strong>Flood</strong>way. Outflows from the dam are conveyed by the 36-inch<br />
diameter principal spillway pipe <strong>and</strong> the 600-foot-wide earth-lined auxiliary spillway.<br />
Numerous hydrologic surface water evaluations (e.g. rainfall-runoff volumes) have been conducted<br />
as part of the planning study for the <strong>Powerline</strong>, Vineyard Road, <strong>and</strong> Rittenhouse FRS<br />
Rehabilitation or Replacement Project. These evaluations provide the hydrologic basis of the<br />
evaluation of existing conditions at the three dams <strong>and</strong> the basis of evaluation of planning<br />
rehabilitation or replacement alternatives. The evaluations were conducted for various storm<br />
frequency events, existing <strong>and</strong> future l<strong>and</strong> use conditions, <strong>and</strong> planning alternatives.<br />
A summary of the hydrologic <strong>and</strong> hydraulic evaluations is provided in the “Investigation <strong>and</strong><br />
Analysis Supporting Information” in Appendix D. Electronic PDF files of the hydrologic <strong>and</strong><br />
hydraulic studies <strong>and</strong> evaluations are provided on the enclosed compact disk (CD).<br />
4.5 WATER QUALITY<br />
The <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS <strong>and</strong> watershed are located in the Arizona Department of Water Resources<br />
Phoenix Active Management <strong>Plan</strong>ning Area (AMA). The AMA was established pursuant to the<br />
1980 Arizona Groundwater Management Act. The other AMAs include the Santa Cruz AMA, the<br />
Tucson AMA, the Pinal AMA, <strong>and</strong> the Prescott AMA. A review of the on-line Phoenix AMA<br />
water database indicates that there are no perennial streams <strong>and</strong> that there are no impaired lakes or<br />
streams located within the watershed. The washes within the watershed are ephemeral flowing only<br />
in response to rainfall events. When flows do occur in the washes, the stormwater runoff typically<br />
becomes laden with sediment. This stormwater flows from the watershed into the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS<br />
impoundment.<br />
The <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS has no direct effect on water quality in terms of designated beneficial uses,<br />
impairment of those uses, or pollutants or parameters that exceed st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
USDA- NRCS Page 4-3 <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />
Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc.