06.11.2014 Views

Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />

Pinal County, AZ<br />

Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

are transported to the distal portions of fans. As gradients flatten toward the distal portions of fans,<br />

sediments become finer grained <strong>and</strong> less permeable, <strong>and</strong> drainage channels often converge.<br />

The <strong>Powerline</strong>, Vineyard Road, <strong>and</strong> Rittenhouse FRS have been the subject (particularly <strong>Powerline</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> the northern 1/3 of Vineyard Road FRS) of previous geohazard investigations <strong>and</strong> analyses<br />

including studies as part of this planning study. The <strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>and</strong> Vineyard Road FRS are located<br />

in a region of local l<strong>and</strong> subsidence. The purpose of the geohazard investigations were to evaluate<br />

potential impacts of ground subsidence <strong>and</strong> earth fissuring on the existing structures <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

selection <strong>and</strong> subsequent development of rehabilitation designs <strong>and</strong>/or replacement alternatives for<br />

flood protection afforded by the <strong>Powerline</strong>, Vineyard Road <strong>and</strong> Rittenhouse <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding<br />

Structures (FRS). The results, findings <strong>and</strong> conclusion of the studies were used by the project team<br />

in its development <strong>and</strong> evaluation of dam rehabilitation <strong>and</strong>/or replacement alternatives.<br />

There are known earth fissures in the project area near Hawk Rock <strong>and</strong> one known earth fissure<br />

located immediately downstream of the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS embankment at about Station 115+45.<br />

There also is a high probability that the earth fissure near Station 115+45 extends beneath the<br />

existing embankment. It is suspected that subsidence patterns at the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS will continue<br />

into the future, potentially causing further development of fissures in this area.<br />

The studies have developed, through various techniques <strong>and</strong> methods, earth fissure risk zone<br />

mapping for the PVR structures. Figure C-8 in Appendix C is the earth fissure risk zones<br />

prepared for the PVR structures. As depicted in the risk zone map, <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS has portions of<br />

the dam within all four zones. Vineyard Road FRS is within two zones, <strong>and</strong> Rittenhouse FRS falls<br />

within one zone (the lowest probability zone). The zones are defined below.<br />

In general terms, the earth fissure risk delineating process has evolved to include 4 general earth<br />

FRZs that are broadly similar from site to site, although the exact definitions of the FRZs vary from<br />

one site to another. The numbering system used to identify the four zones has changed through time<br />

<strong>and</strong> from site to site, so a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the level of risk is provided by the actual<br />

definition than by the zone number. The four FRZ definitions can be summarized as follows:<br />

• Zone 1: An area with a known earth fissure(s), a high probability for the presence of earth<br />

fissures without surface expression, or a high probability for the future development of earth<br />

fissures.<br />

• Zone 2: An area that in the future is likely to experience tensional ground strain that could<br />

cause earth fissures, yet no earth fissures have been identified to date. An area with a<br />

moderate probability for the future development of earth fissures.<br />

• Zone 3: An area that has or is likely to experience some tensional ground strain, though not<br />

great enough to result in earth fissures. An area with a low to moderate probability for the<br />

future development of earth fissures.<br />

• Zone 4: An area that has not, <strong>and</strong> is not expected to, experience tensional ground strain. An<br />

area with a low probability for the future development of earth fissures.<br />

The key terms used in the FRZ definitions are the presence of known fissures or the high, moderate,<br />

low to moderate or low probability for the future development of earth fissures.<br />

USDA- NRCS Page 4-2 <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />

Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!