Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />
Pinal County, AZ<br />
Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
• Commercial/Industrial – existing commercial <strong>and</strong> industrial businesses, Phoenix-Mesa<br />
Gateway Airport<br />
• Institutional – K-12 schools, churches, college campuses, federal, county <strong>and</strong><br />
municipal properties<br />
• Agricultural – active agricultural l<strong>and</strong><br />
• Agricultural(structures) – parcels including both active agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
agricultural buildings<br />
• Infrastructure – roads, irrigation districts, utilities’ right-of-way<br />
• Vacant – vacant l<strong>and</strong> (regardless of zoning designation)<br />
The accuracy of the parcels database <strong>and</strong> Use Codes was verified through a fieldview <strong>and</strong><br />
examination of aerial photography.<br />
Population-at-Risk (PAR)<br />
The population benefiting from the dams consists of the population that would be inundated by<br />
an uncontrolled breach of the dam. Dambreak scenarios for each FRS were previously modeled<br />
for the “<strong>Powerline</strong>, Vineyard <strong>and</strong> Rittenhouse <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structures Emergency Action<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>” (FCD 2006).<br />
The estimated population within the dambreak floodplain limits, based on the structures<br />
inventory, were estimated <strong>and</strong> provided in the memor<strong>and</strong>um. Where the dambreak floodplain<br />
limits fell outside of the study area, the estimated number of residential structures was<br />
extrapolated based on a percent increase or decrease in the study area population (i.e., the<br />
Rittenhouse FRS dambreak limits were 14% larger than the overall study area, so the population<br />
of the study area was multiplied by 1.14 to estimate the dambreak population). This<br />
extrapolation was verified with aerial mapping denoting approximate population density.<br />
Household size was estimated using 2010 U.S. Census Bureau demographic data on average<br />
household size for Maricopa <strong>and</strong> Pinal Counties. The estimate (2.73 persons) is an average of<br />
the two counties (2.67 <strong>and</strong> 2.78 persons, respectively).<br />
For commercial/industrial <strong>and</strong> institutional structures, population estimates were based on<br />
daytime occupancy. Commercial/industrial <strong>and</strong> institutional structures estimates were based on<br />
the structures inventory. The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport falls within the dambreak<br />
floodplain for all three dams, <strong>and</strong> so was included in each population at risk estimate. The<br />
average occupancy at the airport was estimated using data from the Phoenix-Mesa Gateway<br />
Airport Authority’s report, Economic Benefit Analysis, FY 2010. Average occupancy at Arizona<br />
State University Polytechnic Campus was estimated to be approximately 1/2 of the annual<br />
enrollment of 9,700 students. Average occupancy at Mesa Community College, a commuter<br />
campus, was estimated to be approximately 1/4 of the annual enrollment of 27,000 students.<br />
For the portion of the dambreak area outside the project study area, 2010 U.S. Geological Survey<br />
GIS data was used to identify additional schools. It was outside the scope of the analysis to<br />
identify additional commercial/industrial <strong>and</strong> other institutional structures individually for the<br />
portion of the dambreak area outside the project study area. Instead, the number of these<br />
structures was extrapolated based on study area totals.<br />
The PAR estimated in the technical memor<strong>and</strong>um represents a conservative approach <strong>and</strong><br />
estimate.<br />
USDA- NRCS <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />
Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc. Page 10