Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ... Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

fcd.maricopa.gov
from fcd.maricopa.gov More from this publisher
06.11.2014 Views

Powerline Flood Retarding Structure Pinal County, AZ Draft Supplemental Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment principal spillway has capacity to evacuate 90% of the storage capacity in 30 days, excluding reservoir inflows. The NRCS auxiliary spillway design flood is based on the stability design hydrograph and freeboard hydrograph. The stability design hydrograph is based on the 100-year 6-hour event and the 6-hour PMP. The freeboard hydrograph is the hydrograph resulting from the critical PMP. The auxiliary spillway must have the capacity to pass the stability design hydrograph at safe velocity and pass the freeboard hydrograph with a water surface at or below the top of the dam (no freeboard). The ADWR auxiliary spillway design flood and inflow design flood (IDF) will range from 0.5 to the full PMF, with size increasing based on the persons at risk and the potential for downstream damage. The auxiliary spillway capacity must be sufficient to pass the IDF plus freeboard requirements, which (for new or unsafe dams) require the largest of: a) the sum of the IDF maximum water depth above the spillway crest plus wave run up; b) the sum of the IDF maximum water depth of the spillway crest plus 3 feet; or c) a minimum of 5 feet from the auxiliary spillway crest to the dam crest. NRCS stability design requirements include that the auxiliary spillway maximum stress limitations must not be exceeded for the stability design hydrograph. The integrity of the spillway must also be evaluated to ensure the spillway will not breach (headcut will not advance beyond the upstream edge of the level part of the inlet channel) during passage of the freeboard hydrograph. 2.3. Probable Maximum Precipitation/Probable Maximum Flood Kimley-Horn prepared the “Final PMP Technical Memorandum” (Kimley-Horn, 2010) to provide a planning level recommendation of the anticipated percent reduction in probable maximum precipitation (PMP) rainfall depths when using a site-specific approach compared to traditional HMR-49 methods. Kimley-Horn calculated the HMR-49 PMP values for each individual structure watershed rather than as a whole for all three structures. Based on the available results and findings of the Magma FRS site specific studies and the relatively close proximity of the dam to the PVR structures, Kimley-Horn recommended a percent reduction of 10%, 30% and 25% for the 6-, 24-, and 72-hour storms, respectively. The recommended planning level PMP was input into PVR FRSs HEC-1 models to develop the planning level PMF for each structure. The controlling storm for the PVR structures, based on this analysis, is the 6-hr PMP local storm. 2.4. Existing and Future Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics Update Kimley-Horn prepared the “Existing and Future Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics Update Technical Report” (Kimley-Horn, 2010) to document hydrologic and hydraulic updates for existing and future land use conditions associated with each FRS. The results of the hydrology and hydraulics study provide baseline conditions for the three structures. Multi-frequency inflow hydrographs were developed for the existing and future conditions 100- year, 6-hour and the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100- and 500-year, 24-hour storms, and the 6-hour, 24- hour and 72-hour probable maximum flood (PMF). 2.5. Level Pool Analysis Results Powerline FRS experiences no flow in the auxiliary spillway for any of the existing conditions multi-frequency (2 yr through 500 yr) events. The future conditions land use for Powerline FRS USDA- NRCS January 2013 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 3

Powerline Flood Retarding Structure Pinal County, AZ Draft Supplemental Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment results in auxiliary spillway flow only during the 500-year, 24-hour storm event at a depth of 0.5 ft. Vineyard Road FRS experiences flow in the auxiliary spillway for the 500-year, 24-hour existing conditions storm event at a depth of 0.5 ft in the south spillway. The 500-year, 24-hour event is the only existing conditions auxiliary flow for Vineyard Road FRS. The future conditions land use 100-year, 24-hour event for Vineyard Road results in a flow depth of 0.6 ft in the south auxiliary spillway. The future conditions land use 500-year, 24-hour event results in a flow depth of 1.8 ft in the south auxiliary spillway and 1.2 ft in the north auxiliary spillway. Rittenhouse FRS experiences flow in the auxiliary spillway for the 500-year, 24-hour existing conditions storm event at a depth of 1.0 ft. The 500-year, 24-hour event is the only existing conditions auxiliary flow for Rittenhouse FRS. The future conditions land use 100-year, 24-hour event for Rittenhouse FRS results in a flow depth of 0.6 ft in the auxiliary spillway. The future conditions 500-year, 24-hour event results in a flow depth of 1.9 ft in the auxiliary spillway. The future conditions land use “with retention” results in no flow for the 100-year 6-hour or 100-year 24-hour events. For all three FRSs, the future conditions multi-frequency peak flow rates, peak storage volumes and peak stages increase relative to existing conditions. The percent increase is highest during more frequent return intervals (i.e. the 2-year storm event) and lowest during less frequent return intervals (i.e. the 500-year event). Both the 100-year 6-hour and 100-year 24-hour future conditions with retention models for all three FRSs result in a decrease in peak storage volume and peak stage and no outflow in the auxiliary spillways. The 6-hour reduced PMP overtops the Powerline FRS crest by 0.6 ft in both the existing and future conditions. The structure is not overtopped in the existing or future conditions 24- and 72- hour reduced PMP events. The existing conditions 6- and 72-hour reduced PMP events overtop the Vineyard Road FRS crest by 1.2 and 0.8 ft, respectively. The future conditions 6-, 24- and 72-hour reduced PMP events all overtop the Vineyard Road FRS crest by 1.3, 0.4 and 0.7 ft, respectively. Vineyard Road FRS is not overtopped in the 24-hour existing conditions reduced PMP event. Rittenhouse FRS is overtopped in all existing and future conditions reduced PMP events. The existing conditions 6-, 24- and 72-hour reduced PMP events overtop the Rittenhouse FRS crest by 1.0, 0.1 and 0.3 ft, respectively. The future conditions 6-, 24- and 72-hour reduced PMP events overtop the Rittenhouse FRS crest by 1.0, 0.1 and 0.2 ft, respectively. 2.6. Dynamic Reservoir Routing Results HEC-1 existing conditions inflow hydrographs developed for the 100-year, 6-hour and 100-year, 24-hour storms and the 6-, 24- and 72-hour reduced PMP storms were used to update the dynamic reservoir routing FLO-2D models prepared as part of the “DDA Inundation and Sedimentation” (ASLD, 2007). The FLO-2D models were used to generate auxiliary spillway outflow hydrographs and freeboard estimates for each FRS. USDA- NRCS January 2013 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 4

<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />

Pinal County, AZ<br />

Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

results in auxiliary spillway flow only during the 500-year, 24-hour storm event at a depth of 0.5<br />

ft.<br />

Vineyard Road FRS experiences flow in the auxiliary spillway for the 500-year, 24-hour existing<br />

conditions storm event at a depth of 0.5 ft in the south spillway. The 500-year, 24-hour event is<br />

the only existing conditions auxiliary flow for Vineyard Road FRS. The future conditions l<strong>and</strong><br />

use 100-year, 24-hour event for Vineyard Road results in a flow depth of 0.6 ft in the south<br />

auxiliary spillway. The future conditions l<strong>and</strong> use 500-year, 24-hour event results in a flow depth<br />

of 1.8 ft in the south auxiliary spillway <strong>and</strong> 1.2 ft in the north auxiliary spillway.<br />

Rittenhouse FRS experiences flow in the auxiliary spillway for the 500-year, 24-hour existing<br />

conditions storm event at a depth of 1.0 ft. The 500-year, 24-hour event is the only existing<br />

conditions auxiliary flow for Rittenhouse FRS. The future conditions l<strong>and</strong> use 100-year, 24-hour<br />

event for Rittenhouse FRS results in a flow depth of 0.6 ft in the auxiliary spillway. The future<br />

conditions 500-year, 24-hour event results in a flow depth of 1.9 ft in the auxiliary spillway. The<br />

future conditions l<strong>and</strong> use “with retention” results in no flow for the 100-year 6-hour or 100-year<br />

24-hour events.<br />

For all three FRSs, the future conditions multi-frequency peak flow rates, peak storage volumes<br />

<strong>and</strong> peak stages increase relative to existing conditions. The percent increase is highest during<br />

more frequent return intervals (i.e. the 2-year storm event) <strong>and</strong> lowest during less frequent return<br />

intervals (i.e. the 500-year event). Both the 100-year 6-hour <strong>and</strong> 100-year 24-hour future<br />

conditions with retention models for all three FRSs result in a decrease in peak storage volume<br />

<strong>and</strong> peak stage <strong>and</strong> no outflow in the auxiliary spillways.<br />

The 6-hour reduced PMP overtops the <strong>Powerline</strong> FRS crest by 0.6 ft in both the existing <strong>and</strong><br />

future conditions. The structure is not overtopped in the existing or future conditions 24- <strong>and</strong> 72-<br />

hour reduced PMP events.<br />

The existing conditions 6- <strong>and</strong> 72-hour reduced PMP events overtop the Vineyard Road FRS<br />

crest by 1.2 <strong>and</strong> 0.8 ft, respectively. The future conditions 6-, 24- <strong>and</strong> 72-hour reduced PMP<br />

events all overtop the Vineyard Road FRS crest by 1.3, 0.4 <strong>and</strong> 0.7 ft, respectively. Vineyard<br />

Road FRS is not overtopped in the 24-hour existing conditions reduced PMP event.<br />

Rittenhouse FRS is overtopped in all existing <strong>and</strong> future conditions reduced PMP events. The<br />

existing conditions 6-, 24- <strong>and</strong> 72-hour reduced PMP events overtop the Rittenhouse FRS crest<br />

by 1.0, 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 0.3 ft, respectively. The future conditions 6-, 24- <strong>and</strong> 72-hour reduced PMP<br />

events overtop the Rittenhouse FRS crest by 1.0, 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 0.2 ft, respectively.<br />

2.6. Dynamic Reservoir Routing Results<br />

HEC-1 existing conditions inflow hydrographs developed for the 100-year, 6-hour <strong>and</strong> 100-year,<br />

24-hour storms <strong>and</strong> the 6-, 24- <strong>and</strong> 72-hour reduced PMP storms were used to update the<br />

dynamic reservoir routing FLO-2D models prepared as part of the “DDA Inundation <strong>and</strong><br />

Sedimentation” (ASLD, 2007). The FLO-2D models were used to generate auxiliary spillway<br />

outflow hydrographs <strong>and</strong> freeboard estimates for each FRS.<br />

USDA- NRCS <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />

Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc. Page 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!