Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ... Powerline Plan and Environ. Assessment Jan. 2013 - Flood Control ...

fcd.maricopa.gov
from fcd.maricopa.gov More from this publisher
06.11.2014 Views

Powerline Flood Retarding Structure Pinal County, AZ Draft Supplemental Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment APPENDIX D INVESTIGATIONS AND ANALYSES REPORT POWERLINE FLOOD RETARDING STRUCTURE SUPPLEMENTAL WATERSHED PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. For the: Flood Control District of Maricopa County FCD2008C042 In cooperation with: Natural Resources Conservation Service US Department of Agriculture USDA- NRCS January 2013 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Powerline Flood Retarding Structure Pinal County, AZ Draft Supplemental Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 2. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS ................................................................................2 2.1. Previous Studies ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Hydrologic Design Criteria ....................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Probable Maximum Precipitation/Probable Maximum Flood .................................................... 3 2.4. Existing and Future Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics Update ........................................... 3 2.5. Level Pool Analysis Results ..................................................................................................... 3 2.6. Dynamic Reservoir Routing Results ......................................................................................... 4 2.7. Principal Spillway Hydrograph, Stability Design Hydrograph and Freeboard Hydrograph ........ 5 2.8. Downstream Inundation Analysis ............................................................................................. 6 2.9. Sediment Yield Analysis Update .............................................................................................. 6 2.10. Freeboard ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.11. Level II Hydrology and Hydraulics Technical Memorandum .................................................... 7 2.12. Final Level III Alternatives Summary Report............................................................................ 7 3. ECONOMICS......................................................................................................................9 3.1. Economics Evaluation Technical Memorandum Summary ........................................................ 9 3.1.1. Study Area Inventory ..................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Hydrologic Model .....................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3. Hydraulic Model .................................................................................................................... 11 3.4. Benefits: Preferred Alternative and No Federal Action Alternative ......................................... 11 3.5. Costs: Preferred Alternative and No Federal Action Alternative .............................................. 12 3.5.1. Benefit-Cost Ratio ........................................................................................................ 12 3.5.2. Risks and Uncertainty ................................................................................................... 13 4. GEOTECHNICAL ............................................................................................................ 14 4.1. Final Geotechnical Summary and Analysis Report .................................................................. 14 4.1.1. Scope of Work ................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.1.2. Previous Investigations ................................................................................................. 14 4.1.3. Planning Geotechnical Investigation ............................................................................. 14 4.1.4. Regional Geologic Setting ............................................................................................ 15 4.1.5. Local Geomorphic Setting ............................................................................................ 15 4.1.6. Local Geologic Setting ................................................................................................. 15 4.1.7. Soil Profiles at Structures ................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. USDA- NRCS January 2013 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page i

<strong>Powerline</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Retarding Structure<br />

Pinal County, AZ<br />

Draft Supplemental Watershed <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Environ</strong>mental <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1<br />

2. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS ................................................................................2<br />

2.1. Previous Studies ....................................................................................................................... 2<br />

2.2. Hydrologic Design Criteria ....................................................................................................... 2<br />

2.3. Probable Maximum Precipitation/Probable Maximum <strong>Flood</strong> .................................................... 3<br />

2.4. Existing <strong>and</strong> Future Conditions Hydrology <strong>and</strong> Hydraulics Update ........................................... 3<br />

2.5. Level Pool Analysis Results ..................................................................................................... 3<br />

2.6. Dynamic Reservoir Routing Results ......................................................................................... 4<br />

2.7. Principal Spillway Hydrograph, Stability Design Hydrograph <strong>and</strong> Freeboard Hydrograph ........ 5<br />

2.8. Downstream Inundation Analysis ............................................................................................. 6<br />

2.9. Sediment Yield Analysis Update .............................................................................................. 6<br />

2.10. Freeboard ................................................................................................................................. 7<br />

2.11. Level II Hydrology <strong>and</strong> Hydraulics Technical Memor<strong>and</strong>um .................................................... 7<br />

2.12. Final Level III Alternatives Summary Report............................................................................ 7<br />

3. ECONOMICS......................................................................................................................9<br />

3.1. Economics Evaluation Technical Memor<strong>and</strong>um Summary ........................................................ 9<br />

3.1.1. Study Area Inventory ..................................................................................................... 9<br />

3.2. Hydrologic Model .....................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

3.3. Hydraulic Model .................................................................................................................... 11<br />

3.4. Benefits: Preferred Alternative <strong>and</strong> No Federal Action Alternative ......................................... 11<br />

3.5. Costs: Preferred Alternative <strong>and</strong> No Federal Action Alternative .............................................. 12<br />

3.5.1. Benefit-Cost Ratio ........................................................................................................ 12<br />

3.5.2. Risks <strong>and</strong> Uncertainty ................................................................................................... 13<br />

4. GEOTECHNICAL ............................................................................................................ 14<br />

4.1. Final Geotechnical Summary <strong>and</strong> Analysis Report .................................................................. 14<br />

4.1.1. Scope of Work ................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

4.1.2. Previous Investigations ................................................................................................. 14<br />

4.1.3. <strong>Plan</strong>ning Geotechnical Investigation ............................................................................. 14<br />

4.1.4. Regional Geologic Setting ............................................................................................ 15<br />

4.1.5. Local Geomorphic Setting ............................................................................................ 15<br />

4.1.6. Local Geologic Setting ................................................................................................. 15<br />

4.1.7. Soil Profiles at Structures ................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

USDA- NRCS <strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2013</strong><br />

Kimley-Horn <strong>and</strong> Associates, Inc.<br />

Page i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!