Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
62 DENNIS J. BILLY<br />
the similarities and differences between the two fields, as well as<br />
an intense desire to work together on areas of common concern.<br />
It calls for the formulation of helpful parameters within which<br />
such dialogue can occur and warns participants of the danger<br />
that can accrue from a monopolization of the theological<br />
discourse by one of the conversing partners. The model can also<br />
be applied to the various models for the interaction of spiritual<br />
and moral theology themselves. It does so mainly by<br />
encouraging them to strengthen their ties through a<br />
comparative analysis of their relevant likenesses and differences.<br />
As such, it provides an important model for how the<br />
juxtaposition of the various models can take place and offers a<br />
context within which a deeper understanding of how this logical<br />
web of insights might be understood.<br />
7. The contextual model offers loose literary ties as a way of<br />
understanding the interaction between spirituality and moral<br />
theology. It emphasizes the importance of context for<br />
interpreting the content under consideration and encourages a<br />
close reading of one in light of the other. However close that<br />
reading may be, the boundaries between the two disciplines<br />
remain very distinct and the strength of the bonds between the<br />
two disciplines relatively light. This model draws attention to<br />
those less intensive ways in which spirituality and moral<br />
theology relate – and relishes them. It can also be readily applied<br />
to the logical web of insights used to depict the interaction<br />
between the two disciplines. Here, the juxtaposition of models<br />
provides the necessary context from which to view the ongoing<br />
interaction of the two disciplines. Once the logical web is<br />
removed, there is no solid foundation for understanding how the<br />
interface of spirituality and morality takes place over time. From<br />
this perspective, the logical web of insights becomes a complex<br />
conceptual (or “literary”) construct, whose sole purpose is to<br />
provide an adequate hermeneutical context for understanding<br />
the ongoing interaction of the two disciplines.<br />
8. The absorption model raises the possibility of a new type<br />
of integration between spirituality and moral theology. As such,<br />
it forces theologians to imagine the ongoing evolution of<br />
theology and envision a day when the present distinctions<br />
among the disciplines will no longer be needed. In this way, it<br />
projects into the future a teleological point of orientation toward