05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 DENNIS J. BILLY<br />

the similarities and differences between the two fields, as well as<br />

an intense desire to work together on areas of common concern.<br />

It calls for the formulation of helpful parameters within which<br />

such dialogue can occur and warns participants of the danger<br />

that can accrue from a monopolization of the theological<br />

discourse by one of the conversing partners. The model can also<br />

be applied to the various models for the interaction of spiritual<br />

and moral theology themselves. It does so mainly by<br />

encouraging them to strengthen their ties through a<br />

comparative analysis of their relevant likenesses and differences.<br />

As such, it provides an important model for how the<br />

juxtaposition of the various models can take place and offers a<br />

context within which a deeper understanding of how this logical<br />

web of insights might be understood.<br />

7. The contextual model offers loose literary ties as a way of<br />

understanding the interaction between spirituality and moral<br />

theology. It emphasizes the importance of context for<br />

interpreting the content under consideration and encourages a<br />

close reading of one in light of the other. However close that<br />

reading may be, the boundaries between the two disciplines<br />

remain very distinct and the strength of the bonds between the<br />

two disciplines relatively light. This model draws attention to<br />

those less intensive ways in which spirituality and moral<br />

theology relate – and relishes them. It can also be readily applied<br />

to the logical web of insights used to depict the interaction<br />

between the two disciplines. Here, the juxtaposition of models<br />

provides the necessary context from which to view the ongoing<br />

interaction of the two disciplines. Once the logical web is<br />

removed, there is no solid foundation for understanding how the<br />

interface of spirituality and morality takes place over time. From<br />

this perspective, the logical web of insights becomes a complex<br />

conceptual (or “literary”) construct, whose sole purpose is to<br />

provide an adequate hermeneutical context for understanding<br />

the ongoing interaction of the two disciplines.<br />

8. The absorption model raises the possibility of a new type<br />

of integration between spirituality and moral theology. As such,<br />

it forces theologians to imagine the ongoing evolution of<br />

theology and envision a day when the present distinctions<br />

among the disciplines will no longer be needed. In this way, it<br />

projects into the future a teleological point of orientation toward

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!