Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MODELS AND MULTIVALENCE 57<br />
between the two disciplines, thus leaving itself open for possible<br />
misinterpretations by the reader.<br />
The Absorption Model<br />
Summary. Another model for the interaction of spirituality<br />
and moral theology allows for the near or total absorption one<br />
discipline by the other. It does so by defining the boundaries of<br />
each in such a way so that one functions either entirely or in<br />
part within the methodological scope of the other, i.e., either as<br />
a subdiscipline or an integrally related field of theological<br />
inquiry. When viewed in this light, moral theology could be<br />
completely subsumed into spirituality – or vice versa. Such a<br />
scenario would normally demand a loosening of strict claims of<br />
autonomy by one of the disciplines and a widening of the object,<br />
scope, and methodological boundaries of the other. Depending<br />
on how this redefining of the boundaries between the two<br />
disciplines is conceived of and implemented, this model could<br />
allow for a variety of relationships between them. As such, it<br />
recognizes the possibility of different degrees of absorption<br />
within the model and, depending on the theological exigencies<br />
of the moment, even a state of flux between the two. This model<br />
seeks a post-hierarchical integration of spiritual and moral<br />
theology. Keenly aware of the sordid history of the relationship<br />
between the two disciplines (i.e., marriage, divorce, remarriage),<br />
it recognizes that it must construe their present relationship in<br />
such a way that allows the traditional nomenclature to survive,<br />
even if in a qualified, thoroughly renovated sense. It<br />
accomplishes its aim by softening the nature of the boundaries<br />
between the two disciplines so that a merging of theological<br />
horizons can occur. It envisions something more than mere<br />
dialogue which, important as it is, ultimately leaves each<br />
discipline free to return to its theological locus to integrate and<br />
then implement what it has learned. Instead, it looks for a single<br />
methodological nexus that ultimately will embrace what it<br />
previously took two separate disciplines to accomplish. Its goal<br />
is to arrive at an integrated model for the relationship between<br />
spirituality and moral theology in a post-hierarchical setting. As<br />
such, it makes an adaptive use of the past in order to transcend