05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244 STEPHEN T. REHRAUER<br />

when this ratio appears equal for all the individuals involved in<br />

a given distribution or exchange.” 37 In laymen’s terms this could<br />

be summarized in the formula that people should get what they<br />

deserve. Those working within the cognitive-developmental<br />

approach advance the proposition that people judge questions of<br />

injustice according to the equality principle, expressed in<br />

Kohlberg’s statement above, which maintains that all people<br />

should receive equally and impartially based upon the<br />

considerations of universal justice. In layman’s terms, it<br />

amounts to the belief that each should get his equal share of the<br />

pie. According to equity, injustice might be illustrated by a<br />

condition in which two equally qualified and capable workers<br />

receive differing amounts of pay for the same amount and type<br />

of work. According to equality, injustice might be illustrated<br />

when one racial group is consistently and arbitrarily excluded<br />

from full participation in economic and political decision<br />

making procedures. Humanitarian concerns temper both of<br />

these with the consideration of the underlying fundamental<br />

demands that being human requires. All human beings have<br />

certain fundamental needs which they are entitled to satisfy.<br />

There are also some actions, such as beating people, which are<br />

in themselves unjust regardless of whether they are equitable or<br />

equal because they are not worthy activities for human beings. 38<br />

These distinctions are consolidated by Feinberg when he<br />

independently derives from his threefold distinction of forms of<br />

injustice two general types of justice which seem to cross the<br />

37<br />

L. FURBY, “Psychology and Justice,” p. 155.<br />

38<br />

Witness the following quotation taken from Gaudium et Spes 27 in<br />

Veritatis Splendor 80: “Whatever is hostile to life itself, such as any kind of<br />

homicide, genocide, abortion, euthanasia and voluntary suicide; whatever<br />

violates the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, physical and<br />

mental torture and attempts to coerce the spirit; whatever is offensive to<br />

human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary<br />

imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution and trafficking in women<br />

and children; degrading conditions of work which treat laborers as mere<br />

instruments of profit, and not as free responsible persons: all these and the<br />

like are a disgrace, and so long as they infect human civilization they<br />

contaminate those who inflict them more than those who suffer injustice,<br />

and they are a negation of the honor due to the Creator.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!