Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
238 STEPHEN T. REHRAUER<br />
purposes, justice and injustice fall within a specific domain of a<br />
broader reality called morality. Thus our dialogue with the<br />
relevant psychological investigations might also serve to reveal<br />
some of those tendencies which help to clarify that often<br />
ambiguous line separating justice from injustice in the daily<br />
lived experience of our people who are sincerely seeking to<br />
follow the way of justice taught and made possible by the Christ<br />
event.<br />
Broadly speaking, contemporary psychology maintains that<br />
all human action is explainable in terms of motivation—driven<br />
by a need or want related directly or indirectly to survival and<br />
flourishing. Concepts of justice and injustice have a great deal to<br />
do with the basic need people have to feel in control of our own<br />
lives and surroundings. This same need is considered to be the<br />
foundation of the activity of thinking itself. 23 Moral concepts, of<br />
which justice is one of the more important, make it possible for<br />
us to create and maintain stable expectations about our own and<br />
other people’s behaviors within a shared social (moral) order. If<br />
I know how people are supposed to behave in certain situations,<br />
then I know what to do when I find myself in this same or<br />
similar situations. I also know how to respond when people do<br />
not behave in conformity with these expectations. Morality<br />
concepts also enable us to make determinations concerning the<br />
types of persons other people are. These enable us to predict<br />
how they will behave in a wide variety of different situations and<br />
circumstances. The world becomes psychologically and<br />
emotionally a secure and controllable place in which to live<br />
comfortably. But the socially shared life-space is extremely<br />
complex. The partitioning of the social world into areas<br />
governed by specific realms of justice makes life within the<br />
shared social world much more manageable. Likewise, holding<br />
people responsible for specific kinds of unjust behavior enables<br />
groups to provoke social change according to desired<br />
directions. 24<br />
23<br />
M. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, The Evolving Self: A Psychology for the Third<br />
Millennium (New York: Harper, 1993), pp. 159-162.<br />
24<br />
B. WEINER, Judgments of Responsibility, p. 84.