05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

238 STEPHEN T. REHRAUER<br />

purposes, justice and injustice fall within a specific domain of a<br />

broader reality called morality. Thus our dialogue with the<br />

relevant psychological investigations might also serve to reveal<br />

some of those tendencies which help to clarify that often<br />

ambiguous line separating justice from injustice in the daily<br />

lived experience of our people who are sincerely seeking to<br />

follow the way of justice taught and made possible by the Christ<br />

event.<br />

Broadly speaking, contemporary psychology maintains that<br />

all human action is explainable in terms of motivation—driven<br />

by a need or want related directly or indirectly to survival and<br />

flourishing. Concepts of justice and injustice have a great deal to<br />

do with the basic need people have to feel in control of our own<br />

lives and surroundings. This same need is considered to be the<br />

foundation of the activity of thinking itself. 23 Moral concepts, of<br />

which justice is one of the more important, make it possible for<br />

us to create and maintain stable expectations about our own and<br />

other people’s behaviors within a shared social (moral) order. If<br />

I know how people are supposed to behave in certain situations,<br />

then I know what to do when I find myself in this same or<br />

similar situations. I also know how to respond when people do<br />

not behave in conformity with these expectations. Morality<br />

concepts also enable us to make determinations concerning the<br />

types of persons other people are. These enable us to predict<br />

how they will behave in a wide variety of different situations and<br />

circumstances. The world becomes psychologically and<br />

emotionally a secure and controllable place in which to live<br />

comfortably. But the socially shared life-space is extremely<br />

complex. The partitioning of the social world into areas<br />

governed by specific realms of justice makes life within the<br />

shared social world much more manageable. Likewise, holding<br />

people responsible for specific kinds of unjust behavior enables<br />

groups to provoke social change according to desired<br />

directions. 24<br />

23<br />

M. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, The Evolving Self: A Psychology for the Third<br />

Millennium (New York: Harper, 1993), pp. 159-162.<br />

24<br />

B. WEINER, Judgments of Responsibility, p. 84.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!