Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
220 HANS J. MÜNK<br />
new “Lexikon der Bioethik” (Encyclopaedia of Bioethics),<br />
“retinity” is defined as an ethical principle, “the basic<br />
requirement of which is to guide the development of human<br />
civilisation such that the network of ecological systems which<br />
support it is preserved”. 6<br />
3. Foundation in Social and Environmental Ethics<br />
Describing the foundations of the model with respect to<br />
contents necessarily draws on principles of social ethics and<br />
concepts such as those developed in the context of traditional,<br />
“classical” paradigms. As a Catholic theologian, I have elsewhere<br />
sought to demonstrate this by way of the principles of Catholic<br />
social doctrine. 7 In one decisive point, however, I exceed the<br />
boundaries of this doctrine; namely, in connection with the task<br />
of total interconnection as engendered by the concept of<br />
“retinity”. For any social ethics embedded in Christian theology,<br />
building bridges that connect back to the central themes of<br />
(theoretical) systematic theology is an inherent requirement.<br />
This has been and continues to be acknowledged in at least a<br />
fundamental way with respect to anthropological aspects (e.g.<br />
concerning the creation of man in the image of God). This<br />
cannot be asserted to the same degree with respect to nonhuman<br />
life, and even less so with respect to the non-living<br />
dimensions of Creation. Classical social principles as well as the<br />
more modern imperative to give the option for the poor priority<br />
are anthropocentric. The non-human dimensions of nature are<br />
addressed more or less secondarely, as a necessary implication<br />
of human life. However, this is not consistent with the essential<br />
6<br />
Vogt, M., ”Retinität”, in W. Korff et al. (ed.), Lexikon der Bioethik, vol.<br />
3 (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus 1998) p. 209.<br />
7<br />
Cf. the work cited in remark 4. Of course, other approaches are also<br />
conceivable, such as the discursive ethical type; cf. e.g. Höhn, H.-J., ”Technik<br />
und Natur: Perspektiven einer ökologischen Sozialethik”, in H.-J. Höhn (ed.),<br />
Christliche Sozialethik interdisziplinär (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh,<br />
1997) pp. 263-289. On social principles, cf. Baumgartner, A. / Korff, W. ,<br />
”Sozialprinzipien”, in W. Korff et al. (ed.), Lexikon der Bioethik, vol. 3<br />
(Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1998) pp. 405-411.