05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 HANS J. MÜNK<br />

new “Lexikon der Bioethik” (Encyclopaedia of Bioethics),<br />

“retinity” is defined as an ethical principle, “the basic<br />

requirement of which is to guide the development of human<br />

civilisation such that the network of ecological systems which<br />

support it is preserved”. 6<br />

3. Foundation in Social and Environmental Ethics<br />

Describing the foundations of the model with respect to<br />

contents necessarily draws on principles of social ethics and<br />

concepts such as those developed in the context of traditional,<br />

“classical” paradigms. As a Catholic theologian, I have elsewhere<br />

sought to demonstrate this by way of the principles of Catholic<br />

social doctrine. 7 In one decisive point, however, I exceed the<br />

boundaries of this doctrine; namely, in connection with the task<br />

of total interconnection as engendered by the concept of<br />

“retinity”. For any social ethics embedded in Christian theology,<br />

building bridges that connect back to the central themes of<br />

(theoretical) systematic theology is an inherent requirement.<br />

This has been and continues to be acknowledged in at least a<br />

fundamental way with respect to anthropological aspects (e.g.<br />

concerning the creation of man in the image of God). This<br />

cannot be asserted to the same degree with respect to nonhuman<br />

life, and even less so with respect to the non-living<br />

dimensions of Creation. Classical social principles as well as the<br />

more modern imperative to give the option for the poor priority<br />

are anthropocentric. The non-human dimensions of nature are<br />

addressed more or less secondarely, as a necessary implication<br />

of human life. However, this is not consistent with the essential<br />

6<br />

Vogt, M., ”Retinität”, in W. Korff et al. (ed.), Lexikon der Bioethik, vol.<br />

3 (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus 1998) p. 209.<br />

7<br />

Cf. the work cited in remark 4. Of course, other approaches are also<br />

conceivable, such as the discursive ethical type; cf. e.g. Höhn, H.-J., ”Technik<br />

und Natur: Perspektiven einer ökologischen Sozialethik”, in H.-J. Höhn (ed.),<br />

Christliche Sozialethik interdisziplinär (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh,<br />

1997) pp. 263-289. On social principles, cf. Baumgartner, A. / Korff, W. ,<br />

”Sozialprinzipien”, in W. Korff et al. (ed.), Lexikon der Bioethik, vol. 3<br />

(Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1998) pp. 405-411.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!