05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210 M. B. RAMOSE<br />

insistence on a controlling role for NATO thus precluded a<br />

combined approach to Belgrade and doomed the prospects for a<br />

Security Council resolution on the question.” 33 Why the<br />

insistence that NATO should form the “core” and thus<br />

paramount military presence in Kosovo even at the expense of a<br />

United Nations security force properly and duly mandated? Why<br />

concede a decisive role to NATO when specifically European<br />

institutions such as the Council of Europe and the Organisation<br />

for Security and Co-operation in Europe could have played a<br />

role fitting to their status? For some these Organisations – albeit<br />

with American presence – are still too weak to assume the<br />

leadership that the United States provides in promoting stability<br />

and security in Europe. In the aftermath of the collapse of the<br />

Soviet Union, so the argument continues, American leadership<br />

in Europe is even more important. However, such leadership<br />

may be dispensed with and NATO would become obsolete once<br />

Europe is firmly established to provide for its own stability and<br />

security. 34 The merits of this questionable argument<br />

notwithstanding, an attempt to answer the questions posed<br />

must take into account the fact that NATO, born before its rival<br />

military alliance, the Warsaw Pact, insisted upon its continued<br />

existence when the latter disbanded voluntarily in the aftermath<br />

of the collapse of the Soviet Union. The justification for the<br />

continued existence of NATO is to be found partly in the<br />

identification of Islam, particularly by the predecessor of Xavier<br />

Solana, Willy Claes, as the enemy of NATO. Does this mean that<br />

in the apparent absence of a credible ideological threat backed<br />

by force NATO has decided to be the defender of an unidentified<br />

religion against Islam? What is the special and unique problem<br />

about Islam? Apart from this seeming revival of the crusade<br />

wars another reason for the continued existence of NATO lies in<br />

the alliance’s “new strategic concept.” 35 The latter, taking its cue<br />

33<br />

Blackburn, R., Kosovo: the war of NATO expansion, 235 New Left<br />

Review, May/June 1999, p. 108.<br />

34<br />

Odom, W.E., Russia’s several seats at the table, International Affairs,<br />

<strong>Vol</strong>. 74 No. 4 1998, p. 813-815.<br />

35<br />

NATO Review No. 2 Summer 1999. “The Alliance’s Strategic concept<br />

approved by the Heads of State and Government participating in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!