05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ST. AUGUSTINE’S CRITIQUE OF THE ADIAPHORA 193<br />

tique of the adiaphora clearly reflects this commitment. The causal<br />

relationship between God and creatures provides the foundation<br />

for purposefulness and intelligibility throughout created<br />

reality. Morally speaking, it also establishes a basis of objective<br />

laws for the regulation of human conduct. Accordingly,<br />

Augustine envisions a true moral cosmos based upon a proper<br />

ordering of the soul’s loves and relationships that is correlative<br />

with a larger Ordo. This is not to say that Augustine’s anthropology<br />

does not exhibit certain dualistic presuppositions of its<br />

own. While he continually attempted to develop a theory of<br />

human nature that did justice to our psychosomatic unity, he<br />

would always identify the human being with the soul, and thereby,<br />

define us in terms of a soul using a mortal and earthly body. 62<br />

But although Augustine defined us primarily in terms of a spiritual<br />

principle endowed with reason (and conversely, subordinated<br />

the body to the soul as its ruler), he likewise viewed us as<br />

occupying a crucial mid-rank position between God and lower<br />

corporeal natures.<br />

In a very real sense, the human person (as a composite of<br />

soul and body, spirit and matter) is a microcosm of creation. As<br />

such, the person requires the same harmonization of parts to<br />

whole that is operative on a cosmic scale. From this standpoint,<br />

the body has a value as an indispensable component of human<br />

nature, just as corporeal reality is necessary for the completion<br />

of creation as a whole. But by the same token, the body and its<br />

well-being cannot be absolutized as ends in themselves. Rather,<br />

they must be viewed in terms of the dignity of a person created<br />

in God’s image, and in a broader sense, in relation to a hierarchy<br />

of being in which humans constitute the very summit of God’s<br />

creative activity.<br />

A WORD CONCERNING SOURCES<br />

This paper has relied upon the following translations: DIOGENES LAER-<br />

TIUS, Lives of Eminent Philosophers. 2 <strong>Vol</strong>umes, translated by R.D. Hicks. The<br />

62<br />

De moribus Ecclesiae catholicae et de moribus Manichaeorum I,27<br />

(52). Cf., De Quantitate Animae 13(22); De Trinitate I,10(22).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!