Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
184 JOSEPH TORCHIA<br />
In this way, Augustine can rightfully say that the condition<br />
of anger and the utterance of an angry word against another person<br />
is a greater sin than a case in which one’s anger festers in<br />
silence. 46 But if the Stoic thesis were true, it would seriously<br />
undermine Christian teachings regarding human accountability<br />
and the prospect for an eternal reward or punishment for the<br />
moral quality of our lives. 47 Like his critique of the adiaphora,<br />
Augustine’s criticism of the equality of sins reflects a certain<br />
scale of values that is itself based upon an distinctive Christian<br />
understanding of the scheme of reality. In this respect, his ethics<br />
continually refers us to his metaphysics and anthropology. The<br />
concluding section, then, considers the broader philosophical<br />
basis of Augustine’s moral theory and its relevance for his critique<br />
of pertinent Stoic notions.<br />
Augustine’s Ordo of Creation: The Parameters of Moral Action<br />
In Augustinian terms, reality is depicted as an ordered<br />
whole in which God holds the preeminent position (as supremely<br />
perfect, eternal, and immutable), mutable spiritual creatures<br />
(i.e., angels and human souls) occupy the intermediate<br />
position or mid-rank, and mutable corporeal realities occupy the<br />
lowest level. All creatures depend upon God (as the plenitude of<br />
Being) for their existence and goodness. 48 In this scheme, any<br />
movement away from God is tantamount to a movement toward<br />
non-being. Broadly speaking, creatures tend toward non-being<br />
by virtue of their creaturely finitude and susceptibility to change.<br />
In moral terms, rational creatures tend toward non-being as a<br />
result of sin, that is, through erroneous choices for apparent<br />
goods.<br />
On the basis of these metaphysical presuppositions,<br />
Augustine refuted the radical dualism of Manichaeism. If God is<br />
the supreme Creator of everything which exists (and thereby,<br />
everything depends upon God for its very being), there is no pos-<br />
46<br />
De Sermone Domini in Monte I,9(24): PL xxxiv, 1241.<br />
47<br />
Epistula 92(5): PL xxxiv, 320.<br />
48<br />
De Natura Boni 1: CSEL XXV (VI,2), 855.