05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 JOSEPH TORCHIA<br />

3. Augustine’s Rejection of the Equality of Sins<br />

While Augustine rejects the notion that earthly ills are<br />

morally neutral, then, he also denies that they are absolutely<br />

evil. Everything in our world (including ourselves) exhibits a<br />

curious mixing of both good and evil. While created things are<br />

fundamentally good, they also reveal varying degrees of an<br />

imperfection that is ultimately rooted in their finitude and/or<br />

fallenness. This was something that the Stoics could not appreciate.<br />

From their perspective, good and evil (and by implication,<br />

virtue and vice) must always be mutually exclusive moral categories.<br />

For the Stoic sage, the practical upshot of such a position<br />

was an indifference to the world at large, and the demotion of<br />

many things that are part and parcel of human existence to a<br />

morally inconsequential status.<br />

As we have seen, the Stoics’ understanding of virtue as a<br />

consistent inner disposition for living in accordance with nature<br />

carried an important corollary: all virtues and vices are<br />

equal in virtuousness or viciousness, respectively. In this sense,<br />

the wise man possesses every virtue, while the fool possesses<br />

none at all. Accordingly, the uncompromising mentality which<br />

characterizes the Stoic distinction between virtue and vice<br />

carried over into their understanding of the parameters of the<br />

virtuous life.<br />

Marcia Colish offers a succinct explanation for this key<br />

aspect of Stoic moral theory:<br />

The moral life is not a question of piecemeal effort or habituation<br />

to the good. If the fool sees the light and chooses to shed<br />

his vicious orientation, he can experience an instant conversion<br />

to wisdom. Since the fool’s logos is not in harmony with nature,<br />

nothing he does is good; since the sage’s logos is in conformity<br />

with nature, everything he does will be good automatically. 40<br />

The unacceptability of such a moral doctrine from the<br />

standpoint of Christian morality is readily obvious. But what is<br />

40 COLISH, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages,<br />

<strong>Vol</strong>ume I, 44-45.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!