Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
122 MARTIN MCKEEVER<br />
A number of recent theological studies have considered<br />
human rights, 25 noting both the important historical process of<br />
cross-fertilization between theology and this form of discourse,<br />
as well as the weighty systematic questions which emerge when<br />
one attempts to integrate human rights discourse into<br />
theological ethics. We will not repeat here the results of these<br />
useful studies but simply note the manner in which they confirm<br />
the need noted above for a better articulation of the normative<br />
basis of human rights. 26<br />
It is worth noting, however, that just as our reading of the<br />
prelude to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights shows a<br />
strong reliance on ethical principles (without an extensive<br />
articulation of same), so too a reading of documents which<br />
present Official Catholic teaching, particularly on moral issues,<br />
would show an increasingly heavy reliance on the discourse of<br />
human rights as a category of ethical argumentation. In some<br />
cases the underlying ethical values such as the dignity of human<br />
life and duty not to kill, torture or act unjustly toward human<br />
beings are simply stated without further justification. In both<br />
social encyclicals and in those on bio-medical issues (though<br />
interestingly not in the same way) human rights discourse is<br />
invoked as a category of ethical argumentation, but is not<br />
elaborated at a theoretical level. In other documents,<br />
particularly those of a more theoretical nature, the ethical basis<br />
of human rights is sought in an articulation of the natural law<br />
25<br />
See, for example, K. HILPERT, Die Menschenrechte, Geschichte,<br />
Theologie, Aktualität. (Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag, 1991); F. COMPAGNONI, I<br />
diritti dell’uomo, Genesi, storia e impegno cristiano. (Torino: San Paolo,<br />
1995).<br />
26<br />
“Menschenrechte sind also kritische Prinzipien zur Beurteilung der<br />
Gerechtigkeit von positiven Rechtsordnungen. Die positive Geltung der<br />
Gesetze allein und für sich verbürgt noch nicht ihre Gerechtigkeit. [...] Der<br />
Maßstab des Rechts ist nicht die Macht, sondern die in den<br />
Menschenrechten entfaltete überpositive Gerechtigkeit. Das ist dann auch<br />
der Grundgedanke dessen, was man in der Ethik wenigstens seit der Stoa<br />
Naturrecht nannte.” K. HILPERT, Die Menschenrechte, 70. See also F.<br />
COMPAGNONI, I diritti dell’uomo, 189-210; K. Tanner, Der lange Schatten des<br />
Naturrechts, Eine fundamentalethische Untersuchung (Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln:<br />
Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1993).