Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 MARTIN MCKEEVER<br />
Like every fable, this one suggests some truths which are<br />
anything but fabulous. Alaisdair MacIntyre 13 argues that the<br />
Babel-like confusion of modern ethical discussion is due to the<br />
fact that many of the terms in use have been extricated from the<br />
original conceptual context within which they find their<br />
meaning. The term “human rights” would seem to be a case in<br />
point, in that this locution is so often used with very little<br />
awareness of the conceptual matrices from which the<br />
component terms have been drawn. 14 But surely it is precisely<br />
the personalistic, juridical and emancipative resonances of the<br />
component terms with lend the term “human rights” its<br />
polemical force? It will be argued below , in fact, that a residual<br />
normative element perdures in human rights discourse, but in a<br />
masked form in order not to offend relativist sensibilities.<br />
Equally, it is often forgotten that the neologism “human<br />
rights” was developed in the real world of modern politics and<br />
economics. There is a very close tie, for example, between the<br />
concept of right and the concept of freedom, to the point that it<br />
has been argued that human rights discourse is the quintessence<br />
of modern liberal culture. 15 If one considers liberal culture as<br />
ethically beyond reproach this fact constitutes no problem. If,<br />
however, one is aware of the moral ambiguity of this form of<br />
13<br />
See, in particular, After Virtue (London: Duckworth, 1981); Whose<br />
Justice? Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988).<br />
14<br />
Among the innumerable sources treating the historical evolution of<br />
human rights see in particular: I. SHAPIRO, The Evolution of Rights in Liberal<br />
Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986); L. STRAUSS, Diritto<br />
naturale e storia, (Venezia: Neri Pozza Editore, 1957); M. VILLEY, Le droit et<br />
les droits de l’homme (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983); C.B.<br />
MACPHERSON, Libertà e proprietà alle origini del pensiero borghese. La teoria<br />
dell’individualismo possessivo da Hobbes a Locke, trans. Silvana Borutti<br />
(Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 1982); G. TERRUZZI, “I Diritti Umani Nella<br />
Storia”, in I Diritti Umani, riflessioni teoriche e indicazioni didattiche, a cura<br />
di P. DANUVOLA (Brescia: Editrice La Scuola, 1989) 21-41; G. OESTREICH,<br />
Geschichte der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten im Umriss (Berlin:<br />
Duncker & Humblot, (1968) 1978).<br />
15<br />
See, for example, N. BOBBIO, L’età dei diritti (Einaudi contemporanea<br />
12, 1992).