05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 MARTIN MCKEEVER<br />

“It is a human right to choose whether or not to carry a<br />

pregnancy to term”<br />

How is the individual citizen, the legislator or other<br />

interested party to respond concretely to such claims? From<br />

even this brief list, to which one could easily add hundreds of<br />

other examples, it is clear that a blanket acceptance or a blanket<br />

refusal of all human rights claims is not an adequate response.<br />

A pragmatic response must take account of a number of factors<br />

which complicate the question: the proliferation and widening<br />

range of human rights claims, the conflicting nature of some<br />

claims, the forum in which public policy is debated, the limited<br />

nature of available resources, the authority to protect and<br />

enforce human rights claims.<br />

Human rights discourse has become the preferred idiom in<br />

which to press for almost every imaginable kind of social,<br />

political and legal reform or development. One unfortunate<br />

consequence of this is that human rights which concern<br />

survival, and as such merit a certain priority, are discussed in the<br />

same idiom as much less urgent, though quite possibly<br />

legitimate, concerns. The proliferation of human rights claims 9<br />

derives also from the fact that the term has been stretched to<br />

include an ever wider range of subjects (individuals, couples,<br />

families, communities, nations) and an ever wider range of<br />

issues (physical and mental well-being, social conditions,<br />

political structures and processes, gender and ethnic issues).<br />

There is thus a need for a method of distinguishing between<br />

different types of human rights and different degrees of urgency<br />

involved. This is particularly clear in the context of so called<br />

“social rights”, sometimes known as the third generation of<br />

human rights, when limited resources are to be distributed<br />

among individuals and groupings who make rival claims on the<br />

basis of various rights. Faced with such demands it is surely too<br />

easy simply to declare that whole populations have the right to<br />

9<br />

On the consequences of the proliferation of rights claims see L.W.<br />

SUMNER, The Moral Foundations of Human Rights, (Oxford: Clarendon Press,<br />

1987).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!