Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE USE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE 109<br />
In the light of these comments it will be clear that the<br />
cultural milieu in which current discussions of human rights<br />
issues take place is by no means a neutral environment but is<br />
itself, in considerable measure, the product of historical<br />
processes in which human rights discourse has played a<br />
significant role. The task in hand is to study more closely some<br />
of the main issues which arise when this discourse is used as a<br />
category of ethical discourse in such a cultural context.<br />
A pragmatic perspective<br />
Human rights discourse is often used in situations of<br />
distress, oppression and conflict, sometimes of an extremely<br />
urgent and critical nature. Appeals for action in such<br />
circumstances are often pragmatic in nature, calling for an<br />
immediate response of a humanitarian, juridical, political or<br />
even military kind. Human rights discourse has shown itself to<br />
be charged with a particular political valency in a whole range<br />
of struggles and battles: the enforced abolition of apartheid in<br />
South Africa, the collapse of the Soviet system, the various<br />
Balkan catastrophes and Pinochet’s arrest in Britain are among<br />
the many cases in point. The precise role that human rights<br />
discourse has played in inspiring, supporting and effecting the<br />
political processes involved in such cases is well beyond the<br />
scope of this article, but there is no doubt that it has played its<br />
part. Both in situations of this kind, as well as in less dramatic<br />
circumstances, the pragmatic question arises as to how one<br />
should respond to an increasingly wide range of human rights<br />
claims. Let us consider, simply by way of illustrating the<br />
problem, the following list of claims:<br />
“It is a human right not be tortured”<br />
“It is a human right to end one’s own life if the pain caused by<br />
terminal illness becomes intolerable”<br />
“It is a human right to have the freedom to express one’s<br />
political opinion without being driven over by a tank”<br />
“It is a human right of homosexual couples to adopt children”<br />
“It is a human right of the embryo not to be aborted”<br />
“It is a human right to have sufficient food to sustain one’s life”