05.11.2014 Views

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

Vol. XXXVIII / 1 - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE USE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE 109<br />

In the light of these comments it will be clear that the<br />

cultural milieu in which current discussions of human rights<br />

issues take place is by no means a neutral environment but is<br />

itself, in considerable measure, the product of historical<br />

processes in which human rights discourse has played a<br />

significant role. The task in hand is to study more closely some<br />

of the main issues which arise when this discourse is used as a<br />

category of ethical discourse in such a cultural context.<br />

A pragmatic perspective<br />

Human rights discourse is often used in situations of<br />

distress, oppression and conflict, sometimes of an extremely<br />

urgent and critical nature. Appeals for action in such<br />

circumstances are often pragmatic in nature, calling for an<br />

immediate response of a humanitarian, juridical, political or<br />

even military kind. Human rights discourse has shown itself to<br />

be charged with a particular political valency in a whole range<br />

of struggles and battles: the enforced abolition of apartheid in<br />

South Africa, the collapse of the Soviet system, the various<br />

Balkan catastrophes and Pinochet’s arrest in Britain are among<br />

the many cases in point. The precise role that human rights<br />

discourse has played in inspiring, supporting and effecting the<br />

political processes involved in such cases is well beyond the<br />

scope of this article, but there is no doubt that it has played its<br />

part. Both in situations of this kind, as well as in less dramatic<br />

circumstances, the pragmatic question arises as to how one<br />

should respond to an increasingly wide range of human rights<br />

claims. Let us consider, simply by way of illustrating the<br />

problem, the following list of claims:<br />

“It is a human right not be tortured”<br />

“It is a human right to end one’s own life if the pain caused by<br />

terminal illness becomes intolerable”<br />

“It is a human right to have the freedom to express one’s<br />

political opinion without being driven over by a tank”<br />

“It is a human right of homosexual couples to adopt children”<br />

“It is a human right of the embryo not to be aborted”<br />

“It is a human right to have sufficient food to sustain one’s life”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!