05.11.2014 Views

Presentation by Jerry Gibson, SC DHEC- Hospital Infection Database

Presentation by Jerry Gibson, SC DHEC- Hospital Infection Database

Presentation by Jerry Gibson, SC DHEC- Hospital Infection Database

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SC</strong> ACA Implementation Committee – Quality and<br />

Outcomes Work Group<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Gibson</strong><br />

<strong>DHEC</strong> ‐ State Epidemiologist<br />

6/3/2011


HIDA<br />

• <strong>Hospital</strong> <strong>Infection</strong>s Disclosure Act<br />

• Passed in May 2006, requiring inpatient acute care<br />

hospitals to report to the <strong>SC</strong> <strong>DHEC</strong> selected hospital<br />

acquired infections and selected infection prevention<br />

processes


HIDA (cont)<br />

• Since 2007, inpatient rehabilitation and long‐term<br />

acute care (LTAC) facilities have been added.<br />

• Currently, 79 facilities report on central line associated<br />

bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and certain surgical<br />

site infections (SSIs)


Timeline for Activities Required for Compliance with <strong>Hospital</strong> <strong>Infection</strong>s<br />

Disclosure Law<br />

6/29/06<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

internal<br />

meeting<br />

Aug 06<br />

1 st Advisory<br />

Committee<br />

meeting<br />

Aug 06<br />

CDC<br />

Training<br />

for<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

Feb 07<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

begins<br />

pilot<br />

analysis<br />

of data<br />

July 07<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

gets<br />

funding<br />

???<br />

Nov 07<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

accesses<br />

6-month<br />

of data in<br />

NHSN to<br />

begin<br />

analysis<br />

1/31/08<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

publishes<br />

1 st report<br />

Feb 08<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

begins<br />

QA of<br />

data<br />

Feb 09<br />

<strong>DHEC</strong><br />

submits 1 st<br />

Report to<br />

legislature<br />

May 06<br />

Law<br />

passed<br />

Nov 06<br />

Begin<br />

Training<br />

for ICPs<br />

at APIC<br />

Jan 07<br />

ICPs<br />

begin to<br />

pilot<br />

NHSN<br />

May 07<br />

ICPs<br />

begin<br />

formal<br />

entry of<br />

data<br />

into<br />

NHSN


National Healthcare Safety<br />

Network<br />

• A secure, internet<br />

based surveillance<br />

system through<br />

which facilities can<br />

report their data on<br />

hospital associated<br />

infections


What is a Standardized <strong>Infection</strong><br />

Ratio (SIR)?<br />

• The SIR is a summary measure used to track HAIs at a<br />

national, state, and local level over time.<br />

• Method of calculating is similar to the Standardized<br />

Mortality Ratio<br />

• The SIR compares the actual number of HAIs reported to<br />

the baseline experience<br />

• Adjusted for several risk factors that have been found to be<br />

significantly associated with differences in infection<br />

incidence.<br />

• An SIR greater than 1.0 indicates that more HAIs were<br />

observed than predicted; an SIR less than 1.0 means fewer<br />

HAIs were observed than predicted


Mandatory Reporting of Healthcare‐associated <strong>Infection</strong><br />

Rates ‐ 2009<br />

*<br />

www.APIC.org


Central lines access large<br />

veins, catheter tip is near<br />

heart, may remain in place<br />

for weeks or months<br />

Central line‐associated<br />

bloodstream infection =<br />

CLABSI


CLABSI<br />

•Crude mortality 10‐40%<br />

•Attributable mortality 2‐15%<br />

•Prolongation of hospitalization 5‐20<br />

days<br />

•Attributable cost $34,000‐$56,000


SIRs for CLABSI,<br />

all <strong>SC</strong> hospitals<br />

calendar year<br />

2010, <strong>by</strong> patient<br />

care unit<br />

Central Line<br />

Locations<br />

All Adult<br />

Inpatient<br />

Units<br />

Adult<br />

Critical<br />

Care Units<br />

Pediatric<br />

Inpatient<br />

Pediatric<br />

Critical<br />

Care Unit<br />

Inpatient<br />

Rehab Unit<br />

# <strong>Hospital</strong>s<br />

monitoring<br />

Locations<br />

Total #<br />

Central<br />

Line<br />

Days<br />

Total #<br />

<strong>Infection</strong><br />

s<br />

% Lower<br />

SIR<br />

% Not<br />

Different<br />

SIR<br />

62 247,473 329 4.84% (3) 82.26%<br />

(51)<br />

52 134,929 228 7.69% (4) 84.62%<br />

(44)<br />

16 9833 10 6.25% (1) 56.25%<br />

(9)<br />

5 7371 11 20% (1) 80%<br />

(4)<br />

16 12,804 14 0% 87.5%<br />

(14)<br />

%<br />

Higher<br />

SIR<br />

Comments<br />

1.61% (1) Seven<br />

hospitals<br />

(11.29%) had too<br />

few central line<br />

days to calculate<br />

a statistical<br />

percentage<br />

5.77% (3) One hospital<br />

(1.92%) had too<br />

few central line<br />

days<br />

0% Six hospitals<br />

(37.5%) had too<br />

few central line<br />

days<br />

0% N/A<br />

6.25% (1) One hospital<br />

(6.25%) had too<br />

few central line<br />

days<br />

LTAC 7 50,279 77 0% 100% 0% N/A<br />

Heme/Onc<br />

Unit<br />

8 35,566 53 25%<br />

(2)<br />

75%<br />

(6)<br />

0% N/A<br />

Pediatric<br />

Heme/Onc<br />

Unit<br />

Bone<br />

Marrow<br />

Transplant<br />

Unit<br />

3 6378 15 0% 100% 0% N/A<br />

1 810 0 0% 100% 0% N/A


<strong>SC</strong> CLABSI DATA<br />

• **Although not from 2010 data, it should be noted<br />

that in March 2011, the CDC released data showing<br />

that, of 17 states with a mandate for reporting<br />

CLABSIs to NHSN, South Carolina was the only<br />

state to demonstrate a significant decrease in<br />

CLABSI SIRs. South Carolina’s CLABSI rate<br />

dropped 30% July to December 2009 when<br />

compared to January to June 2009, in continuously<br />

reporting facilities. (www.cdc.gov/vital signs)


PICU CLABSI SIR Trend Graph<br />

(Only Includes Medical and Medical/Surgival PICUs)<br />

5<br />

4.5<br />

SIR O=E ?? CI<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

Standardized <strong>Infection</strong> Ratio<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1.61<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1.18<br />

1.01<br />

0.5<br />

Source: <strong>DHEC</strong>, Bureau of Disease Control - HAI Section<br />

0.53<br />

0<br />

Jan 08 - Jun 08 Jul 08 - Dec 08 Jan 09 - Jun 09 Jul 09 - Dec 09 Jan 10 - Dec 10<br />

Trend Point


Continuation of<br />

<strong>Hospital</strong> Report


Surgical Site <strong>Infection</strong>s<br />

• In <strong>SC</strong>, we monitor SSIs from:<br />

• Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)<br />

• Hip Replacements<br />

• Knee Replacements<br />

• Abdominal Hysterectomies<br />

• Colectomies (in facilities with


SIR<br />

• SIR= observed<br />

expected<br />

• For SSIs, calculated using logistical regression<br />

model<br />

• Risk factors vary <strong>by</strong> procedure, but include patient<br />

age, ASA score, surgery duration, medical school<br />

affiliation, gender, type of anesthesia used,<br />

hospital bed size, wound class, trauma and others


Surgical site infections, six sites, all <strong>SC</strong> hospitals, calendar year 2010<br />

Surgical<br />

Procedures<br />

# <strong>Hospital</strong>s<br />

performing<br />

procedure<br />

Total #<br />

Procedures<br />

Total #<br />

<strong>Infection</strong>s<br />

% Lower<br />

SIR<br />

% Not<br />

Different<br />

SIR<br />

% Higher<br />

SIR<br />

Comments*<br />

Coronary<br />

Artery Bypass<br />

Graft (Chest<br />

and Donor<br />

Incision)<br />

16 3930 29 0% 93.75% (15) 6.25%<br />

(1)<br />

N/A<br />

Coronary<br />

Artery Bypass<br />

Graft (Chest<br />

Incision)<br />

12 293 1 0% 33.33% (4) 0% * Eight<br />

<strong>Hospital</strong>s (66.67%) had too<br />

few procedures to calculate<br />

statistical percentage<br />

Hysterectomy<br />

(Abdominal)<br />

49 5337 44 0% 75.51%<br />

(37)<br />

2.04%<br />

(1)<br />

Eleven<br />

hospitals (22.45%) had too<br />

few procedures<br />

Hip Prosthesis -<br />

-Replacement<br />

53 6684 81 0% 73.58% (39) 5.66%<br />

(3)<br />

Eleven<br />

hospitals (20.75%) had too<br />

few procedures<br />

Knee Prosthesis<br />

--Replacement<br />

50 10,394 69 0% 82%<br />

(41)<br />

6%<br />

(3)<br />

Six<br />

hospitals (12%) had too few<br />

procedures<br />

Colon Surgery 34 1,246 36 0% 58.82% (20) 5.88%<br />

(2)<br />

Twelve hospitals (35.29%)<br />

had too few procedures


Example of an Individual<br />

<strong>Hospital</strong> Report<br />

<strong>SC</strong> was one of only 5<br />

states that validated all<br />

Reports. Rates were<br />

significantly higher in<br />

those states, due to<br />

better reporting.


Microorganisms<br />

Number<br />

Isolates<br />

Percent<br />

Candida species and other yeasts 147 17.8<br />

Enterococcus species (includes VRE) 143 17.3<br />

Vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE only - % of total isolates) 41 (5.0)<br />

Coagulase negative Staphylococcus species 140 16.9<br />

Staphylococcus aureus (includes MRSA) 104 12.6<br />

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />

isolates)<br />

(MRSA) only - % of total positive<br />

66 (8.0)<br />

Klebsiella species 77 9.3<br />

Enterobacter species 39 4.7<br />

Escherichia coli 33 4.0<br />

Pseudomonas species 25 3.0<br />

Serratia species 22 2.7<br />

Streptococcus species 18 2.2<br />

Acinetobacter species 15 1.8<br />

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 7 0.8<br />

Citrobacter species 7 0.8<br />

Proteus species 6 0.7<br />

Bacteroides species 5 0.6<br />

Other anaerobes 5 0.6<br />

Providencia species 4 0.5<br />

Morganella species 4 0.5<br />

Burkholderia species 3 0.4<br />

Clostridium species 3 0.4


Validation<br />

• <strong>SC</strong> is one of few states that validates data entered into<br />

NHSN <strong>by</strong> facilities<br />

• One of only five states that perform actual chart reviews<br />

• Especially important to identify “system” errors<br />

• Also helps <strong>DHEC</strong> to establish and maintain good<br />

relationships with IPs<br />

• In 2009 CDC report on infection rates from 10 states<br />

with “mature” reporting, CDC concluded that the states<br />

doing validation had significantly better reporting<br />

completeness(including <strong>SC</strong> and NY).


• Provides framework to ensure progress towards<br />

five‐year national prevention targets as described<br />

in the HHS Action Plan in the following areas:<br />

• Develop or Enhance Public Health HAI Program<br />

Infrastructure<br />

• Surveillance, Detection, Reporting, and Response<br />

• Prevention<br />

• Evaluation, Oversight, and Communication


<strong>Hospital</strong> <strong>Infection</strong>s Disclosure Act<br />

(HIDA) Web Sites<br />

•<strong>DHEC</strong> Public Reports<br />

• www.scdhec.gov/hai<br />

•Information for <strong>Hospital</strong>s<br />

•www.scdhec.gov/hidainfo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!