A Route to Carbasugar Analogues - Jonathan Clayden - The ...
A Route to Carbasugar Analogues - Jonathan Clayden - The ... A Route to Carbasugar Analogues - Jonathan Clayden - The ...
Chapter 2 – Dearomatising additions to aryl oxazolines Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph O N O N O N O O 137 138 139 OH Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph O N O NLi O N Li 140 O O 141 142 O Ox* Ox* Ox* OH O Me O 143 SN2' 144 lithiation 144a isomerisation Scheme 2.29 – possible reaction pathways of allyl ether Still and co-workers found that treatment of allyl ether 133 with n-BuLi led to near quantitative α- and γ-alkylation, the latter being selective for the cis isomer (144a); this is presumably due to the formation of a π-allyllithium complex similar to 140. 98 This intermediate might also act as an intramolecular nucleophile in a similar manner to the work of Kenworthy and Clayden, who found related naphthyloxazoline 145 underwent dearomatising cyclisation. 99 Whilst Kenworthy was performing a kinetically more favourable 5-exo-trig cyclisation, 6-exo cyclisation to give tetrahydrochromene 142 might be possible. O N O SnBu 3 MeLi, THF −78 °C 1 hr then MeI O N Me O OMe 145 OMe 79% >25:1 dr Scheme 2.30 – dearomatising cyclisation onto 2-naphthyloxazolines 99 83
2.4 – Mechanistic discussion The tethered oxazoline 101j was treated under the reaction conditions, giving a forest green solution. Mass recovery from the reaction was poor, but the isolated products were very interesting. Ox* i) i-PrLi (2 eq) THF, DMPU −78 °C Ox* Ox* Ox* 101j O ii) MeI O 102j O O 10% 5% 20% 102j* 142 dr 2:3 Scheme 2.31 – dearomatising addition of allyl tether The major products of the reaction are believed to be two diastereomers of bicycle 142, with a combined yield of 20%. However, two discrepancies exist in this assignment; whilst the 1 H spectra NMR of the separated diastereomers appears to be show single compounds, adjacent half-intensity peaks appear in the 13 C NMR, resembling a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. Furthermore the 1 H NMR spectra contain many high multiplicity peaks with small couplings (1-2 Hz). These spectra are provided in appendix A. Dearomatised adduct 102j and its isomer 102j* were characterised by having almost identical 13 C and 1 H spectra to adduct 102c, which had been identified by crystal structure, only differing in the pendent allyl system. Importantly, no other products could be identified in the crude NMR. Unfortunately only 15% of the dearomatised adducts 102j were recovered, compared with 54% of 102c. Whilst diminished yields were anticipated due to the reactivity of the allyl group, it means that we cannot be sure that some tetrahydrobenzofuran 136 was not formed, and cannot exclude two reaction pathways. As indicated in Scheme 2.28, the absence of a trapped radical does not exclude electron transfer, but simply gives an upper limit on the lifetime of a radical anion ‡ETj of around 10 ns. This allows us to rule out a slow RC step which might have involved diffusion of i-Pr• out of the solvent cage. Whilst much controversy has surrounded the use of allyl tethers as mechanistic probes, in Newcomb’s critique on the practice he concludes that the only mechanistic certainty they provide is in the absence of radical trapping. 92 Although the poor yield means we cannot be certain, we have shown that free radical intermediates are unlikely. 84
- Page 32 and 33: Chapter 1: Introduction The amino a
- Page 34 and 35: Chapter 1: Introduction It was envi
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter 1: Introduction COR' i) ATP
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 1: Introduction O i) ATPH,
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 1: Introduction 1.4 Nucleop
- Page 42 and 43: Chapter 1: Introduction Unlike the
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 1: Introduction Diene (-)-8
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 1: Introduction A scheme su
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 1: Introduction Cl R + 93 S
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 92: Chapter 2 - Dearomatising additions
- Page 95 and 96: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis 3.1.1.a H
- Page 97 and 98: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis O Ar OH i
- Page 99 and 100: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis 3.1.2 Gen
- Page 101 and 102: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis mCPBA O N
- Page 103 and 104: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis 3.1.4.b M
- Page 105 and 106: 3.1 - Oxazoline synthesis Ph Ph Ph
- Page 107 and 108: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal O N O OH 3N
- Page 109 and 110: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal O Me O N OM
- Page 111 and 112: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal However, th
- Page 113 and 114: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal 3.2.3 Reduc
- Page 115 and 116: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal Ph O N Ph P
- Page 117 and 118: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal 3.2.3.c Ami
- Page 119 and 120: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal Ph Ph Ph Ph
- Page 121 and 122: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal 3.2.5.b N-A
- Page 123 and 124: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal Ph Ph O N H
- Page 125 and 126: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal Ph Me Ph Me
- Page 127 and 128: 3.2 - Oxazoline removal 3.2.6 Deter
- Page 129 and 130: Better, however, would be a method
- Page 131 and 132: 4.1 - Introduction HO OH OH HO OH O
2.4 – Mechanistic discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> tethered oxazoline 101j was treated under the reaction conditions, giving a forest<br />
green solution. Mass recovery from the reaction was poor, but the isolated products<br />
were very interesting.<br />
Ox*<br />
i) i-PrLi (2 eq)<br />
THF, DMPU<br />
−78 °C<br />
Ox*<br />
Ox*<br />
Ox*<br />
101j<br />
O<br />
ii) MeI<br />
O<br />
102j<br />
O<br />
O<br />
10% 5% 20%<br />
102j*<br />
142 dr 2:3<br />
Scheme 2.31 – dearomatising addition of allyl tether<br />
<strong>The</strong> major products of the reaction are believed <strong>to</strong> be two diastereomers of bicycle 142,<br />
with a combined yield of 20%. However, two discrepancies exist in this assignment;<br />
whilst the 1 H spectra NMR of the separated diastereomers appears <strong>to</strong> be show single<br />
compounds, adjacent half-intensity peaks appear in the 13 C NMR, resembling a 1:1<br />
mixture of diastereomers. Furthermore the 1 H NMR spectra contain many high<br />
multiplicity peaks with small couplings (1-2 Hz). <strong>The</strong>se spectra are provided in<br />
appendix A.<br />
Dearomatised adduct 102j and its isomer 102j* were characterised by having almost<br />
identical 13 C and 1 H spectra <strong>to</strong> adduct 102c, which had been identified by crystal<br />
structure, only differing in the pendent allyl system. Importantly, no other products<br />
could be identified in the crude NMR. Unfortunately only 15% of the dearomatised<br />
adducts 102j were recovered, compared with 54% of 102c. Whilst diminished yields<br />
were anticipated due <strong>to</strong> the reactivity of the allyl group, it means that we cannot be<br />
sure that some tetrahydrobenzofuran 136 was not formed, and cannot exclude two<br />
reaction pathways. As indicated in Scheme 2.28, the absence of a trapped radical does<br />
not exclude electron transfer, but simply gives an upper limit on the lifetime of a<br />
radical anion ‡ETj of around 10 ns. This allows us <strong>to</strong> rule out a slow RC step which<br />
might have involved diffusion of i-Pr• out of the solvent cage.<br />
Whilst much controversy has surrounded the use of allyl tethers as mechanistic probes,<br />
in Newcomb’s critique on the practice he concludes that the only mechanistic certainty<br />
they provide is in the absence of radical trapping. 92 Although the poor yield means we<br />
cannot be certain, we have shown that free radical intermediates are unlikely.<br />
84