Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ...

Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ... Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ...

archives.njit.edu
from archives.njit.edu More from this publisher
04.11.2014 Views

160 , ., I .. : I :. '. • • !. ::! ::; : II' : ',':: :::! ~::: lfi I : 1 : ~ . f ., :;': ~!: I: ':. : ::: j :::, :! i 1 ",' !,: :,: :. :1' . " ., • ., ' .! • ," " .'. ':,1' " .. 1 :." • ,.. ".. '. ".' '. '.', j .: , ... , , . " i." . i·1 . ' 'j ~. ., .. ! .. ··'JI·l·; ,1" I' ,,;.,. !:'" !,: i'l' " " :T :::;.; ,I-. ... , ,. .... '. t;..: .;:' ., ., ,. ." '1'" .. :., . ,,1·£ " V:: ; ~. ;. j I ..... , . .!. ,. I . . :. ..'. . : ! ; l , . .. . l' . 1 , ~ j : ~ 1" :::1: :~ ::i ;iI;i;; '. ! ::'1 ;,'1' ": . ,. i:J : ~ ': , .. . I . : , V ' ; " ;:. i ;' : ',' : : j 1 ... , i i' . . .. .. ~ .:, .:):/: ::'h li: J l :ij 'I: il":'I·!::.i,,; :,;:'~'. ":':1:,1 ~

6/ TABLE A-2 CORRECTION FACTORS FOR GLYCERINE VISCOSITY EQUATION Temperat1Jll:'@l liT f' (eC) (ex- 1 ) (eeJ5lt-1~(l)is$) 100 2 .. 68 x 10- 3 0 90 2 .. 75 x 10 -3 0 80 2 .. 83 x 10- 3 0 70 2.91 x 10- 3 0 •.5 60 3 .. 00 x :LO -3 3.0 ,50 3 .. 09 :x 10- 3 9 .. ,5 L~O 3 .. 19 x 10"'3 27 30 3.30 x 10- 3 '71 20 3.41 :x ].0 -3 222 10 3 .. 53 x. 10- 3 6:>67 ~e eerreetion f'aeter was p10tted versus liT ~d f'ouad to deseribe a straight liJ5le on semileg pa~er (Figure A-2). It eould thus be expressed i' := C 10 D/T (A-6 T1:le i'our eonstaJ.fl.ts were evaluated as A ::: -4.14.5 B ::: 1.88 x 10 3 C ::: -12 .. 23

6/<br />

TABLE A-2<br />

CORRECTION FACTORS FOR GLYCERINE VISCOSITY<br />

EQUATION<br />

Temperat1Jll:'@l liT f'<br />

(eC) (ex- 1 ) (eeJ5lt-1~(l)is$)<br />

100 2 .. 68 x 10- 3 0<br />

90 2 .. 75 x 10 -3<br />

0<br />

80 2 .. 83 x 10- 3 0<br />

70 2.91 x 10- 3 0 •.5<br />

60 3 .. 00 x :LO -3 3.0<br />

,50 3 .. 09 :x 10- 3 9 .. ,5<br />

L~O 3 .. 19 x 10"'3 27<br />

30 3.30 x 10- 3 '71<br />

20 3.41 :x ].0 -3 222<br />

10 3 .. 53 x. 10- 3 6:>67<br />

~e eerreetion f'aeter was p10tted versus liT ~d<br />

f'ouad to deseribe a straight liJ5le on semileg pa~er (Figure<br />

A-2). It eould thus be expressed<br />

i' := C 10 D/T<br />

(A-6<br />

T1:le i'our eonstaJ.fl.ts were evaluated as<br />

A ::: -4.14.5<br />

B ::: 1.88 x 10 3<br />

C ::: -12 .. 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!