04.11.2014 Views

Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ...

Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ...

Prediction of batch heat transfer coefficients for pseudoplastic fluids ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

<strong>of</strong> fit and it may t...here<strong>for</strong>e be concluded that bot.h. methods<br />

can be used to characterize the apparent viscosity with equal<br />

success ..<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> the semi-empirical equation is some1tlhat<br />

easier; because there are only tlNO constants, lNhich vary<br />

from impeller to impeller.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the constants in the<br />

theoretical equation could be averaged but there are large<br />

variations in the Reynolds nu..mber exponents vJhich would lead<br />

to rather large errors if averaged.<br />

It may be argued, h01;J'­<br />

ever, that Hhether theT'e are tlNO or five constan"ts, one l'11"ill<br />

probably have to look them up and thus the actual number<br />

<strong>of</strong> constants is limnaterial.<br />

The Correlation C has a distinct advantage over Correlation<br />

G since it has a fundamental basis. The use <strong>of</strong> l/(n + 1)<br />

as a factor in the exponent <strong>of</strong> the Reynolds number <strong>of</strong> the<br />

semi-empirical equation has no fundamental basis. The use<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1/nO.75 in the exponent <strong>of</strong> the consistency ratio was<br />

purely empirical also.<br />

It is thus the belief <strong>of</strong> the author<br />

that Correlation C is the better <strong>of</strong> the two correlations<br />

and is recommended <strong>for</strong> use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!