03.11.2012 Views

Heißkanaldüsen Typ SLT/-DLT Customer information

Heißkanaldüsen Typ SLT/-DLT Customer information

Heißkanaldüsen Typ SLT/-DLT Customer information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Heißkanaldüsen</strong> <strong>Customer</strong> <strong>information</strong><br />

<strong>Typ</strong> <strong>SLT</strong>/-<strong>DLT</strong><br />

Stable and Material Saving Processing of Flame Retardant Polyamides with<br />

GÜNTHER Hot Runner Technology<br />

As a world leading supplier, Moeller GmbH (Bonn) pro-<br />

duces components and systems for automation, command<br />

and control devices. Diverse electrical and electronic<br />

components made of plastic are used in these systems.<br />

Fig. 1 Pushbuttons in command and control equipment<br />

(photo: Moeller GmbH)<br />

For a long time now Moeller has been using molds with<br />

hot runners for sprueless production of these parts. The<br />

advantages of hot runner technology over a conventional<br />

gating system include savings in material and a<br />

reduction in cycle time.<br />

When selecting a plastic for electronic components, it is<br />

often necessary to take account not only of the design<br />

requirements but also of statutory provisions and standards.<br />

In the electronics industry, for example, plastic<br />

components that are in direct contact with live parts must<br />

conform to the IEC Standard (International Electrotechnical<br />

Commission) etc. A further requirement is<br />

that the plastic must be capable of extinguishing itself<br />

after catching fire. Here, Standard 94 of the Underwriters<br />

Laboratories has established itself throughout<br />

the world as the authoritative standard for classifying<br />

flame retardance in plastics. The classification in standard<br />

94 of UL depends on the rate of combustion, time<br />

needed for extinction, formation of drops and afterglow<br />

time. Depending on the component's function, the<br />

following criteria must be met:<br />

UL94 V2: Vertical test specimen; self-extinguishing up<br />

to 30s after withdrawal of the flame, drips of flaming<br />

particles allowed; afterglow max. 60s.<br />

UL94 V0: Vertical test specimen; self-extinguishing up<br />

to 10s after withdrawal of flame; no drips of flaming<br />

particles; afterglow max. 30s.<br />

Moeller usually uses PA66 reinforced with 25% fiber<br />

glass with flame retardant for housing of electrical or<br />

electronic components. This type of material complies<br />

with UL94-V2 combustibility grading as well as other<br />

standards.<br />

A lot of devices from Moeller are also used in areas subject<br />

to the ATEX directives (ATEX = Atmospheres Explosibles<br />

= potentially explosive atmospheres). Here the requirements<br />

set for flammability have recently been<br />

tightened so that these components must now meet the<br />

requirements in combustibility class UL94-V0. On<br />

account of this more stringent requirement Moeller has<br />

had to replace the type of plastic it had previously used in<br />

a lot of components by an appropriate one classified in<br />

conformance with UL94-V0.<br />

Depending on the polymer, various flame protection systems<br />

are necessary to make a plastic flame-retardant. In<br />

the case of the PA66 used here, red phosphorus is used<br />

to give flame retardancy. The combustibility class is<br />

usually influenced by the quantity of the flame protection<br />

system used. Depending on the quantity, the red phosphorus<br />

used here reacts more or less strongly to temperature.<br />

Accordingly overheating during processing can<br />

cause thermal damage to the flame retardant. The gases<br />

arising as a result can form deposits on the mold and lead<br />

to corrosion. Occasionally the gases can even inflame.<br />

The PA66 with 25% glass fibers originally used by<br />

Moeller (combustibility class in conformance with UL94-<br />

V2) could be processed easily with the existing hot<br />

runner system. However, after changing to a PA66-GF25<br />

conforming to combustibility class UL-V0, serious problems<br />

arose when processing with this hot-runner system.<br />

In spite of the processing temperatures of 275…295°C<br />

being appropriate for the material, extremely severe deposits<br />

appeared on the molds. The molds had to be<br />

cleaned every 30,000 to 35,000 shots. In addition to<br />

cleaning the mould deposits, the mold inserts had to be<br />

replaced after every 250,000 shots because of<br />

corrosion. The reason for this heavy formation of<br />

deposits and corrosion in the mold was the significantly<br />

excessive rise in temperature in the hot runner nozzles in<br />

connection with the higher quantity of red phosphorus in<br />

the PA66. With a temperature of 290°C set at the control<br />

unit, temperatures of approx. 360°C were sometimes<br />

measured in the nozzles. This caused a reaction in the<br />

flame retardant.<br />

For any questions, please contact our Application Engineering department at +49 (0) 6451 5008-31 or -63.<br />

The <strong>information</strong> is given in accordance with our present-day knowledge and is meant to provide technical background.<br />

.<br />

www.guenther-hotrunner.com<br />

7/12 Subject to technical changes<br />

iA<br />

1.5. 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!