04.11.2014 Views

elektronická verzia publikácie - FIIT STU - Slovenská technická ...

elektronická verzia publikácie - FIIT STU - Slovenská technická ...

elektronická verzia publikácie - FIIT STU - Slovenská technická ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 Selected Studies on Software and Information Systems<br />

– Semantic Bridging – similarities computed in the previously described phase are used<br />

in the semantic bridging phase to establish correspondence between entities from the<br />

source and target ontology, so that each instance represented according to the source<br />

ontology is translated into the most similar instance described according to the target<br />

ontology. It is performed in five steps:<br />

1. Concept bridging step – selection of pairs of entities to be bridged, according to<br />

the similarities found in previous phase. The same source entity may be part of<br />

different bridges.<br />

2. Property bridging step – specification of the matching properties for each concept<br />

bridge.<br />

3. Inferencing step – specification of bridges for concepts that do not have a specific<br />

counterpart target concept.<br />

4. Refinement step – improve quality of bridges between a source concept and sub<br />

concepts of target concepts.<br />

5. Transformation specification step – intends to associate a transformation procedure<br />

to the translation, in a way that source instance may be translated into target<br />

instances.<br />

– Execution – actually transforms instances from the source ontology into target ontology<br />

by evaluating the semantic bridges defined earlier. It could operate in two distinct<br />

modes:<br />

◦ offline static one time transformation) and<br />

◦ online dynamic, continuous mapping between source and the target.<br />

– Post-processing – takes the results of the execution module to check and improve the<br />

quality of the transformation results.<br />

MAFRA is not a fully automated solution and requires a domain expert to drive the creation<br />

of semantic bridges. This requires an extensive graphical support, as deep understanding<br />

of conceptualizations on both sides (source and target ontology) is required on human side.<br />

Moreover, it is not clear whether a generic semantic bridges could lead to fully automatized<br />

solution or it would be useful to define domain-dependent bridges, which contain domain<br />

specific knowledge.<br />

Information Extraction from Available Documents<br />

Many approaches are employing user models to provide personalized information extraction<br />

(IE) which would significantly impact the web search experience [25, 1]. There are also efforts<br />

to use IE techniques to retrieve information about users, but usually for other purposes than<br />

to populate user model with data suitable for personalization. We can find approaches that<br />

are trying to automatically identify social networks around a particular user. We discussed<br />

in the section 8.5.3 that resulting social network can be used to bootstrap user model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!