03.11.2014 Views

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y<br />

y<br />

180°(±x)<br />

τ<br />

90°(x) – τ<br />

–x<br />

x<br />

–y<br />

180°(±y)<br />

τ<br />

If the phase of the 180° pulse is +x or –x the echo forms along the y-axis,<br />

whereas if the phase is ±y the echo forms on the –y axis. <strong>The</strong>refore, as the 180°<br />

pulse is advanced by 90° (e.g. from x to y) the receiver must be advanced by<br />

180° (e.g. from x to –x). Of course, we could just as well cycle the receiver<br />

phases y, –y, y, –y; all that matters is that they advance in steps of 180°. We<br />

will see later on how it is that this phase cycle cancels out the results of<br />

imperfections in the 180° pulse.<br />

–y<br />

I<br />

S<br />

1<br />

2J<br />

y<br />

1<br />

2J<br />

Pulse sequence for INEPT.<br />

Filled rectangles represent 90°<br />

pulses <strong>and</strong> open rectangles<br />

represent 180° pulses. Unless<br />

otherwise indicated, all pulses<br />

are of phase x.<br />

9.2.8 Difference spectroscopy<br />

Often a simple two step sequence suffices to cancel unwanted magnetization;<br />

essentially this is a form of difference spectroscopy. <strong>The</strong> idea is well illustrated<br />

by the INEPT sequence, shown opposite. <strong>The</strong> aim of the sequence is to transfer<br />

magnetization from spin I to a coupled spin S.<br />

With the phases <strong>and</strong> delays shown equilibrium magnetization of spin I, I z<br />

, is<br />

transferred to spin S, appearing as the operator S x<br />

. Equilibrium magnetization<br />

of S, S z<br />

, appears as S y<br />

. We wish to preserve only the signal that has been<br />

transferred from I.<br />

<strong>The</strong> procedure to achieve this is very simple. If we change the phase of the<br />

second I spin 90° pulse from y to –y the magnetization arising from transfer of<br />

the I spin magnetization to S becomes –S x<br />

i.e. it changes sign. In contrast, the<br />

signal arising from equilibrium S spin magnetization is unaffected simply<br />

because the S z<br />

operator is unaffected by the I spin pulses. By repeating the<br />

experiment twice, once with the phase of the second I spin 90° pulse set to y<br />

<strong>and</strong> once with it set to –y, <strong>and</strong> then subtracting the two resulting signals, the<br />

undesired signal is cancelled <strong>and</strong> the desired signal adds. It is easily confirmed<br />

that shifting the phase of the S spin 90° pulse does not achieve the desired<br />

separation of the two signals as both are affected in the same way.<br />

In practice the subtraction would be carried out by shifting the receiver by<br />

180°, so the I spin pulse would go y, –y <strong>and</strong> the receiver phase go x, –x. This is<br />

a two step phase cycle which is probably best viewed as difference<br />

spectroscopy.<br />

This simple two step cycle is the basic element used in constructing the<br />

9–8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!