03.11.2014 Views

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y<br />

<strong>The</strong> x <strong>and</strong> y projections of the<br />

black vector are both positive.<br />

If the vector had precessed in<br />

the opposite direction (shown<br />

shaded), <strong>and</strong> at the same<br />

frequency, the projection along<br />

x would be the same, but along<br />

y it would be minus that of the<br />

black vector.<br />

θ<br />

x<br />

9.2.2 Quadrature detection<br />

We normally want to place the transmitter frequency in the centre of the<br />

resonances of interest so as to minimise off-resonance effects. If the receiver<br />

reference frequency is the same as the transmitter frequency, it immediately<br />

follows that the offset frequencies, Ω, may be both positive <strong>and</strong> negative.<br />

However, as we have seen in the previous section the effect of the downshifting<br />

scheme used is to generate a signal of the form cos Ωt. Since cos(θ) =<br />

cos(–θ) such a signal does not discriminate between positive <strong>and</strong> negative<br />

offset frequencies. <strong>The</strong> resulting spectrum, obtained by Fourier transformation,<br />

would be confusing as each peak would appear at both +Ω <strong>and</strong> –Ω.<br />

<strong>The</strong> way out of this problem is to detect the signal along two perpendicular<br />

axes. As is illustrated opposite, the projection along one axis is proportional to<br />

cos(Ωt) <strong>and</strong> to sin(Ωt) along the other. Knowledge of both of these projections<br />

enables us to work out the sense of rotation of the vector i.e. the sign of the<br />

offset.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sin modulated component is detected by having a second mixer fed with<br />

a reference whose phase is shifted by π/2. Following the above discussion the<br />

output of the mixer is<br />

cos( Ωt−<br />

π 2)= cosΩtcosπ 2+<br />

sinΩtsinπ<br />

2<br />

= sinΩt<br />

<strong>The</strong> output of these two mixers can be regarded as being the components of the<br />

magnetization along perpendicular axes in the rotating frame.<br />

<strong>The</strong> final step in this whole process is regard the outputs of the two mixers as<br />

being the real <strong>and</strong> imaginary parts of a complex number:<br />

cosΩt + isinΩt = exp( iΩt)<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall result is the generation of a complex signal whose phase varies<br />

according to the offset frequency Ω.<br />

9.2.3 Control of phase<br />

In the previous section we supposed that the signal coming from the probe was<br />

of the form cosω 0<br />

t but it is more realistic to write the signal as<br />

cos(ω 0<br />

t + φ sig<br />

) in recognition of the fact that in addition to a frequency the signal<br />

has a phase, φ sig<br />

. This phase is a combination of factors that are not under our<br />

control (such as phase shifts produced in the amplifiers <strong>and</strong> filters through<br />

which the signal passes) <strong>and</strong> a phase due to the pulse sequence, which certainly<br />

is under our control.<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall result of this phase is simply to multiply the final complex signal<br />

by a phase factor, exp(iφ sig<br />

):<br />

( ) ( iφ<br />

sig )<br />

exp iΩt<br />

exp<br />

As we saw in the previous section, we can also introduce another phase shift by<br />

altering the phase of the reference signal fed to the mixer, <strong>and</strong> indeed we saw<br />

9–4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!