03.11.2014 Views

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

t 1<br />

τ mix t 2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

–1<br />

If we group the first two pulses together they are required to achieve the<br />

transformation ∆p = 0 <strong>and</strong> this leads to a four step cycle in which the pulses go<br />

0 1 2 3 <strong>and</strong> the receiver remains fixed as 0 0 0 0. In this experiment axial<br />

peaks arise due to z-magnetization recovering during the mixing time, <strong>and</strong> this<br />

cycle will not suppress these contributions. Thus we need to add axial peak<br />

suppression, which is conveniently done by adding the simple cycle 0 2 on the<br />

first pulse <strong>and</strong> the receiver. <strong>The</strong> final 8 step cycle is 1st pulse: 0 1 2 3 2 3<br />

0 1, 2nd pulse: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3, 3rd pulse fixed, receiver: 0 0 0 0 2 2<br />

2 2.<br />

An alternative is to cycle the last pulse to select the pathway ∆p = –1, giving<br />

the cycle 0 1 2 3 for the pulse <strong>and</strong> 0 1 2 3 for the receiver. Once again, this<br />

does not discriminate against z-magnetization which recovers during the mixing<br />

time, so a two step phase cycle to select axial peaks needs to be added.<br />

9.5.9.3 Heteronuclear Experiments<br />

<strong>The</strong> phase cycling for most heteronuclear experiments tends to be rather trivial<br />

in that the usual requirement is simply to select that component which has been<br />

transferred from one nucleus to another. We have already seen in section 9.2.8<br />

that this is achieved by a 0 2 phase cycle on one of the pulses causing the<br />

transfer accompanied by the same on the receiver i.e. a difference experiment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> choice of which pulse to cycle depends more on practical considerations<br />

than with any fundamental theoretical considerations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pulse sequence for HMQC, along with the CTP, is shown below<br />

I<br />

∆<br />

∆<br />

t 2<br />

S<br />

1<br />

p I 0<br />

–1<br />

1<br />

p S 0<br />

–1<br />

t 1<br />

Note that separate coherence orders are assigned to the I <strong>and</strong> S spins.<br />

Observable signals on the I spin must have p I<br />

= –1 <strong>and</strong> p S<br />

= 0 (any other value<br />

of p S<br />

would correspond to a heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence). Given<br />

this constraint, <strong>and</strong> the fact that the I spin 180° pulse simply inverts the sign of<br />

p I<br />

, the only possible pathway on the I spins is that shown.<br />

<strong>The</strong> S spin coherence order only changes when pulses are applied to those<br />

spins. <strong>The</strong> first 90° S spin pulse generates p S<br />

= ±1, just as before. As by this<br />

point p I<br />

= +1, the resulting coherences have p S<br />

= +1, p I<br />

= –1 (heteronuclear<br />

zero-quantum) <strong>and</strong> p S<br />

= +1, p I<br />

= +1 (heteronuclear double-quantum). <strong>The</strong> I spin<br />

9–31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!