03.11.2014 Views

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

Phase Cycling and Gradient Pulses - The James Keeler Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

t 1 t 2<br />

p<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

–1<br />

–2<br />

∆p=±1 ±1,±3<br />

+1,–3<br />

<strong>The</strong> solid lines under the sequence represent the coherence orders required<br />

during each part of the sequence; note that it is only the pulses which cause a<br />

change in the coherence order. In addition, the values of ∆p are shown for each<br />

pulse. In this example, as is commonly the case, more than one order of<br />

coherence is present at a particular time. Each pulse is required to cause<br />

different changes to the coherence order – for example the second pulse is<br />

required to bring about no less than four values of ∆p. Again, this is a common<br />

feature of pulse sequences.<br />

It is important to realise that the CTP specified with the pulse sequence is<br />

just the desired pathway. We would need to establish separately (for example<br />

using a product operator calculation) that the pulse sequence is indeed capable<br />

of generating the coherences specified in the CTP. Also, the spin system which<br />

we apply the sequence to has to be capable of supporting the coherences. For<br />

example, if there are no couplings, then no double quantum will be generated<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus selection of the above pathway will result in a null spectrum.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coherence transfer pathway must start with p = 0 as this is the order to<br />

which equilibrium magnetization (z-magnetization) belongs. In addition, the<br />

pathway has to end with |p| = 1 as it is only single quantum coherence that is<br />

observable. If we use quadrature detection (section 9.2.2) it turns out that only<br />

one of p = ±1 is observable; we will follow the usual convention of assuming<br />

that p = –1 is the detectable signal.<br />

9.4 Lineshapes <strong>and</strong> frequency discrimination<br />

9.4.1 <strong>Phase</strong> <strong>and</strong> amplitude modulation<br />

–y<br />

<strong>The</strong> selection of a particular CTP has important consequences for lineshapes<br />

t 1 τ m<br />

t 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> frequency discrimination in two-dimensional NMR. <strong>The</strong>se topics are<br />

1<br />

illustrated using the NOESY experiment as an example; the pulse sequence <strong>and</strong> 0<br />

–1<br />

CTP is illustrated opposite.<br />

If we imagine starting with I z<br />

, then at the end of t 1<br />

the operators present are<br />

− cosΩtI<br />

1 y<br />

+ sinΩtI<br />

1 x<br />

<strong>The</strong> term in I y<br />

is rotated onto the z-axis <strong>and</strong> we will assume that only this term<br />

survives. Finally, the z-magnetization is made observable by the last pulse (for<br />

convenience set to phase –y) giving the observable term present at t 2<br />

= 0 as<br />

cosΩt 1<br />

I x<br />

As was noted in section 9.3.1, I x<br />

is in fact a mixture of coherence orders<br />

p = ±1, something which is made evident by writing the operator in terms of I +<br />

9–13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!