03.11.2014 Views

Anaphylaxis in Schools 3rd Edition

Anaphylaxis in Schools 3rd Edition

Anaphylaxis in Schools 3rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

look for ‘may conta<strong>in</strong>’ warn<strong>in</strong>gs on food <strong>in</strong>gredient labels and be especially careful when purchas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

these foods. It is important to note that exposure to airborne prote<strong>in</strong>s, such as <strong>in</strong> the vapor or steam<br />

produced while cook<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> foods (e.g. fish), has been known to cause an allergic reaction.<br />

Appendix G<br />

Casual Contact with Food Allergens<br />

Allergic reactions to foods such as peanut butter are triggered by specific food prote<strong>in</strong>s. Food odour<br />

is caused by non-prote<strong>in</strong> chemicals. Smell<strong>in</strong>g peanut butter odour is different from <strong>in</strong>hal<strong>in</strong>g airborne<br />

peanut particles (prote<strong>in</strong>s) which might occur from the mass shell<strong>in</strong>g of peanuts <strong>in</strong> a poorly ventilated<br />

area. Peanut-allergic people may feel unwell if they smell peanut butter, but this is likely due to a<br />

strong (and understandable) psychological aversion. Inhal<strong>in</strong>g airborne peanut particles can cause<br />

allergic reactions with symptoms such as rashes, runny nose, itchy eyes, and occasionally wheez<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

but anaphylaxis is thought to be unlikely. Some people worry that just touch<strong>in</strong>g small amounts of<br />

peanut butter will result <strong>in</strong> a significant or life-threaten<strong>in</strong>g allergic reaction.<br />

A U.S. study 7 explored the commonly held beliefs that peanut odour and sk<strong>in</strong> contact with peanut<br />

products pose a significant risk to peanut-allergic <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Many people believe that the mere<br />

presence of peanut products can contam<strong>in</strong>ate the surround<strong>in</strong>g airborne environment, mak<strong>in</strong>g an area<br />

unsafe for a peanut-allergic child. The researchers noted that a very small amount of peanut butter<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced only a local reaction when touched; however, the same amount could cause anaphylaxis<br />

if it was un<strong>in</strong>tentionally transferred to the mouth. While the researchers hope that their study about<br />

casual contact will allay concerns about peanut odour and sk<strong>in</strong> contact with peanut products, they<br />

advise cont<strong>in</strong>ued caution: “Indeed, trace quantities of peanut can <strong>in</strong>duce reactions when <strong>in</strong>gested, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>timate kiss<strong>in</strong>g, although perhaps considered casual contact, is also ak<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>gestion.” They add:<br />

.“Specifically, on the basis of this study alone, we would not recommend chang<strong>in</strong>g any school policies<br />

that protect children with peanut allergy.” The researchers also stressed that they did not study the<br />

effects of hav<strong>in</strong>g a large amount of peanut or peanut butter <strong>in</strong> the room and that further <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

would be required.<br />

Food Labell<strong>in</strong>g of Pre-Packaged Food<br />

Canada’s new food labell<strong>in</strong>g regulations came <strong>in</strong>to effect on August 4, 2012, and require food<br />

manufacturers to clearly identify common food allergens, gluten sources and added sulphites, <strong>in</strong><br />

pla<strong>in</strong> language on the label of pre-packaged food products. Under the new regulations, certa<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>gredients with components that do not conta<strong>in</strong> one of the common allergens will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />

exempt from list<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>dividual components <strong>in</strong> the list of <strong>in</strong>gredients. However, if a common<br />

allergen is a component part of an <strong>in</strong>gredient to be used <strong>in</strong> a mixture, e.g. fish (anchovy) conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> Worcestershire sauce, an <strong>in</strong>gredient <strong>in</strong> barbecue sauce, it has to be listed. Additionally, pla<strong>in</strong><br />

language has to be used if the allergen is not part of the common name, e.g. case<strong>in</strong> (milk). The new<br />

Canadian regulations are <strong>in</strong>tended to provide greater clarity <strong>in</strong> food labell<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with food<br />

allergies. For additional <strong>in</strong>formation about the new regulations, visit the Health Canada website at<br />

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca.<br />

<strong>Anaphylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> & Other Sett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Copyright © 2005-2014 Canadian Society of Allergy and Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Immunology<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!