2012 Trafficking In Persons Final Report.pdf - NCJTC Home

2012 Trafficking In Persons Final Report.pdf - NCJTC Home 2012 Trafficking In Persons Final Report.pdf - NCJTC Home

03.11.2014 Views

Trafficking in Persons symposium Objective 2: Discuss barriers to identifying offenders Finding: The biggest barrier is that no simple profile exists for traffickers as their characteristics and behaviors are always evolving, developing, and changing. Based on attendees' discussions it was agreed that most observable characteristics are situational and cultural specific. Traffickers operating in urban cities will differ greatly from those found in rural communities. Offenders will also vary depending on their ethnic background and state/country of origin. It is therefore better to have a detailed inventory of community situations so that instead of looking for specific behaviors, officials can monitor for questionable situations and circumstances. Examples of situational clues include a single person that has a large amount of foot traffic coming in and out of their home, someone in possession of multiple hotel room keys, and someone with numerous possessions or luggage while their younger companion has very little. Goal 5: Determine best practices in victim services and uncover barriers to successful restoration. Objective 1: Discuss trafficking interventions Findings: Victims need a multi-dimensional treatment approach. There is no specific standard format that can be established due to the varied needs of victims. Participants noted the importance of pre-planning and training. Law enforcement and service providers must develop strong relationships/partnerships. All stakeholders should be part of the planning process and clearly identify the roles and responsibilities of each group. Victim advocates and non-governmental organizations should be properly vetted before being brought into the process. More research is needed on effective anti-trafficking interventions and services for victims and survivors. Objective 2: Explore the benefits and consequences of decriminalization Finding: Decriminalization reduces societal stigma, keeps prostitution charges off the victim’s record, and allows access to an unlimited number of volunteer and employment opportunities. On the other hand, if prostitution was decriminalized, law enforcement would not be able to protect the victim. The juvenile court would also not become involved and would thus be unable to offer services to help the trafficked victim. Leaving prostitution classified as a crime enables criminal justice officials to prosecute traffickers and reduce victimization. Victims also have access to a variety of resources such as clothing, food, housing, medical services, and legal representation. However, criminalization also results in victim blaming, victims having a record, and limited employment/volunteer opportunities. Survivors unanimously favored decriminalization of juvenile prostitution. However, decriminalization should be combined with new policies that provide access to services for victims that would normally only be available through the justice system. Objective 3: Discuss and evaluate obstacles to placement after rescue Finding: Participants indicated that there was generally a lack of resources, knowledge, and political will regarding making placement decisions. There are also a limited number of appropriate facilities with 24

FINAL REPORT specialized treatment for trafficking victims. Territorial disputes between law enforcement and service advocates can hinder the process. Unwillingness to work collaboratively on the issue causes problems as well. Participants also discussed the issues between the Safe Harbor Law and the placement of victims in lockdown facilities. Programs that are not secure can result in victims running away and not completing treatment. The focus of non-governmental organizations on funding has the potential to distract them and reduce their ability to assist with the victim’s placement. Further, as noted by survivors, the options (detention, residential, foster care, returning home) may not be equipped to handle the unique needs of juvenile trafficking victims. Without an understanding of these needs, the intervention will likely fail and the youth will return to streets. Survivors felt strongly that any intervention needed to be survivor lead or survivor informed to be successful. Objective 4: Assess survivor needs Finding: Two primary groupings of needs were identified: immediate and long-term. Officials should be able to address both of these needs. Immediate needs of victims include being treated as a human being, basic needs (food, water, shelter, and clothing), safety/comfort, and medical/psychological treatment. Long-term needs are those arising after victims have left the trafficking environment and must be fulfilled to ensure they can successfully reintegrate back into society. It was noted that everyone’s needs are different and plans need to be customized to the specific victim being assisted. Some long-term needs identified by attendees include continuous therapy and support through the entire process, life skills training (tools to function in society), drug/substance abuse treatment, long-term housing, education/job skill training, and assistance with getting identification documents. Certain victims may also require access to affordable childcare and immigration relief or assistance to return to their home country. Survivors suggested that meeting victim needs involved basic respect, providing for basic needs and careful consideration of treatment options. Objective 5: Assess obstacles to survivor restoration and reintegration Finding: Victim readiness is a key problem. Most victims are not ready to identify themselves as such. There are also relational barriers (attachments to traffickers) that can result in huge trust gaps between victims and those who want to help them. The next barrier is public perception and understanding of the issue among officials. Officials should not assume that a victim is prostituting himself or herself willingly. Such misperception can negatively impact the first interview. Lack of resources, services, and funding is another significant barrier. Legal barriers also come into play especially the criminalization of victims, which limits access to jobs. These findings were echoed by survivors who indicated that it can take years for trafficking victims to see themselves as such because of the trauma they have endured. Arrest records, financial problems, and a lack of services for juvenile and adult victims can hinder reintegration. Objective 6: Explore federal, state, tribal and local resources for domestic and international victims Finding: Participants identified a number of collaborative partners, training/education resources, and force-multiplier tools. Collaborative partners indentified by attendees include Crisis Center (Maryland), 25

<strong>Trafficking</strong> in <strong>Persons</strong> symposium<br />

Objective 2: Discuss barriers to identifying offenders<br />

Finding: The biggest barrier is that no simple profile exists for traffickers as their characteristics and behaviors<br />

are always evolving, developing, and changing. Based on attendees' discussions it was agreed that<br />

most observable characteristics are situational and cultural specific. Traffickers operating in urban cities<br />

will differ greatly from those found in rural communities. Offenders will also vary depending on their ethnic<br />

background and state/country of origin. It is therefore better to have a detailed inventory of community<br />

situations so that instead of looking for specific behaviors, officials can monitor for questionable situations<br />

and circumstances. Examples of situational clues include a single person that has a large amount of foot<br />

traffic coming in and out of their home, someone in possession of multiple hotel room keys, and someone<br />

with numerous possessions or luggage while their younger companion has very little.<br />

Goal 5: Determine best practices in victim services and uncover barriers to successful restoration.<br />

Objective 1: Discuss trafficking interventions<br />

Findings: Victims need a multi-dimensional treatment approach. There is no specific standard format that<br />

can be established due to the varied needs of victims. Participants noted the importance of pre-planning<br />

and training. Law enforcement and service providers must develop strong relationships/partnerships. All<br />

stakeholders should be part of the planning process and clearly identify the roles and responsibilities of<br />

each group. Victim advocates and non-governmental organizations should be properly vetted before being<br />

brought into the process. More research is needed on effective anti-trafficking interventions and services<br />

for victims and survivors.<br />

Objective 2: Explore the benefits and consequences of decriminalization<br />

Finding: Decriminalization reduces societal stigma, keeps prostitution charges off the victim’s record, and<br />

allows access to an unlimited number of volunteer and employment opportunities. On the other hand, if<br />

prostitution was decriminalized, law enforcement would not be able to protect the victim. The juvenile<br />

court would also not become involved and would thus be unable to offer services to help the trafficked<br />

victim. Leaving prostitution classified as a crime enables criminal justice officials to prosecute traffickers<br />

and reduce victimization. Victims also have access to a variety of resources such as clothing, food, housing,<br />

medical services, and legal representation. However, criminalization also results in victim blaming,<br />

victims having a record, and limited employment/volunteer opportunities. Survivors unanimously favored<br />

decriminalization of juvenile prostitution. However, decriminalization should be combined with new policies<br />

that provide access to services for victims that would normally only be available through the justice<br />

system.<br />

Objective 3: Discuss and evaluate obstacles to placement after rescue<br />

Finding: Participants indicated that there was generally a lack of resources, knowledge, and political will<br />

regarding making placement decisions. There are also a limited number of appropriate facilities with<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!