2012 Trafficking In Persons Final Report.pdf - NCJTC Home

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Trafficking in Persons symposium Objective 11: Develop learning objectives for sex trafficking investigators Objective 12: Develop learning objectives for policy makers interested in developing effective human trafficking legislation Objective 13: Develop learning objectives for providing evidence-based interventions Objective 14: Develop learning objectives for collaboratively providing services for victims Objective 15: Develop learning objectives for understanding survivor needs Objective 16: Develop learning objectives for key stakeholders on how to promote recovery beginning with rescue Objective 17: Develop learning objectives for utilizing available resources Objective 18: Develop learning objectives for aftercare providers Objective 19: Develop learning objectives for educating and involving the public 12
FINAL REPORT Symposium Design and Methodology The exploratory study employed various forms of qualitative and quantitative research methods to examine specific child sex and labor trafficking topics including: surveys, focus groups and interviews. 2 The quantitative pre-event surveys were used to measure participant interest in a variety of topics, identify areas of focus group discussion and gauge the level of experience and expertise of the Symposium participants. The Symposium included a combination of informative presentations, and exploratory research methods to gather information on child trafficking. Presentations were made on pertinent human trafficking legislation and research findings; engaging victims in investigations and prosecution; and community and faith-based responses to the problem to prime participants for detailed discussions of child trafficking. Symposium participants were then divided into mixed focus groups to explore detailed issues of child sex and labor trafficking. To enhance the reliability and validity of the focus group data, facilitated discussions of focus group findings were conducted at the start of each day to ensure that the data were complete and accurate. Finally, structured, face-to-face, interviews added supplemental qualitative data to the exploratory study. After the completion of the Symposium, post-event surveys were administered to measure the impact of the event on participant learning, policy and procedure. (See Appendix A for the meeting agenda). Methods The project employed qualitative and quantitative research methods to study specific child sex and labor trafficking topics including: surveys, focus groups and interviews. 3 Qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and focus groups generally produce detailed and valid information on study topics, but suffer from inconsistent or unreliable data. Alternately, quantitative research involving surveys typically produce consistent data, but may be hindered by validity concerns due to the limited scope of the questions and content. Using a mixed approach that incorporates qualitative and quantitative methods in this exploratory study provides data from various sources through multiple techniques. This allows for a comparison of study data, and generally improves the validity and reliability of the research results. The quantitative pre-event surveys were used to measure participant interest in a variety of topics, identify areas of focus group discussion and gauge the level of experience and expertise of the Symposium participants. Large and small facilitated focus group Symposium sessions were used to gather information on child sex and labor trafficking indicators, responses, and restoration practices. Further, structured, face-to-face, interviews added supplemental qualitative data to the exploratory study. Finally, post-event surveys were made available to all symposium participants to determine their level of satisfaction with the event, new knowledge and planned use of Symposium information. 2 While employing traditional research methods and human participants; the Symposium is exempt from the Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects because the study utilizes qualitative techniques (surveys, interviews, observation of public behavior); and participant information is not linked to specific data or outcomes. 3 While employing traditional research methods and human participants; the Symposium is exempt from the Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects because the study utilizes qualitative techniques (surveys, interviews, observation of public behavior); and participant information is not linked to specific data or outcomes. 13
Page 1 and 2: Trafficking in Persons sym posi u m
Page 3 and 4: FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXEC
Page 5 and 6: FINAL REPORT Executive Summary Sinc
Page 7 and 8: FINAL REPORT reach, drop-in centers
Page 9 and 10: FINAL REPORT Introduction Human tra
Page 11 and 12: FINAL REPORT There are a number of
Page 13 and 14: FINAL REPORT whether the interventi
Page 15: FINAL REPORT Goal 5: Determine best
Page 19 and 20: FINAL REPORT Exhibit 1: Focus Group
Page 21 and 22: FINAL REPORT from Mexico and Canada
Page 23 and 24: FINAL REPORT Finding: Trafficking v
Page 25 and 26: FINAL REPORT the prohibition of car
Page 27 and 28: FINAL REPORT cases at the federal l
Page 29 and 30: FINAL REPORT specialized treatment
Page 31 and 32: FINAL REPORT be constantly monitore
Page 33 and 34: FINAL REPORT Participants recommend
Page 35 and 36: FINAL REPORT sound missing persons
Page 37 and 38: FINAL REPORT Objective 4: Develop l
Page 39 and 40: FINAL REPORT Objective 12: Develop
Page 41 and 42: FINAL REPORT Summary of Results The
Page 43 and 44: FINAL REPORT Limitations Explorator
Page 45 and 46: FINAL REPORT Finkelhor, D., &Ormrod
Page 47 and 48: FINAL REPORT Silbert, M. H., & Pine
Page 49 and 50: 2012 Trafficking In Persons Symposi
Page 51 and 52: Phil Keith, Program Director, AMBER
Page 53 and 54: 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Community
Page 55 and 56: FINAL REPORT Appendix B: 2012 Sympo
Page 57 and 58: Contents Annotated Bibliography ...
Page 59 and 60: McGaha, Johnny E. and Amanda Evans,
Page 61 and 62: UNICEF, Guidelines on the Protectio
Page 63 and 64: Lee, Maggy. Trafficking and Global
Page 65 and 66: more often leads to victims being d
Page 67 and 68:
adically shift. Conditions that mak
Page 69 and 70:
article gives strategies for law en
Page 71 and 72:
UNODC, ―Anti-human trafficking ma
Page 73 and 74:
Romanian, Czech, the U.S., and Cana
Page 75 and 76:
Defendant convicted with human traf
Page 77 and 78:
ABA publication from 2009 giving an
Page 79 and 80:
Tiano, Susan, Billy Ulibarri, and C
Page 81 and 82:
Films On Demand. (Producer). (2011)
Page 83 and 84:
Watch The Daily. (Producer). (2011)
Page 85 and 86:
Kurian David v. Signal Internationa
Page 87 and 88:
IOM Counter-Trafficking http://www.
Page 89 and 90:
- Girls Educational and Mentoring S
Page 91 and 92:
Streetlight Program. Established in
Page 93 and 94:
Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Traf
Page 95 and 96:
ecovered victims, and providing phy
Page 97 and 98:
Shared Hope International www.share
show all

2012 Trafficking In Persons Final Report.pdf - NCJTC Home

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?