03.11.2014 Views

MHRA powerpoint template - TOPRA

MHRA powerpoint template - TOPRA

MHRA powerpoint template - TOPRA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>TOPRA</strong> Annual Symposium<br />

From Risk Management to<br />

Benefit Risk Management<br />

Regulatory challenges<br />

following the strengthened EU<br />

Pharmacovigilance Legislation<br />

Dr June Raine<br />

Medicines and Healthcare products<br />

Regulatory Agency<br />

5 October 2010<br />

©


Agenda/Objectives<br />

• What is context for the new European<br />

pharmacovigilance legislation?<br />

• What are key regulatory challenges<br />

following strengthened EU legislation ?<br />

• How to move from risk management to<br />

benefit risk management?<br />

©


Context for the new EU<br />

Pharmacovigilance legislation<br />

©


The problem…<br />

©


Historical perspective<br />

A European Commission<br />

review in 2004 found……<br />

• Unclear roles and<br />

responsibilities<br />

• Complex ADR reporting rules<br />

• Differences at member state<br />

level<br />

• Complex decision making<br />

procedures<br />

• Lack of robust safety studies<br />

©


Goals of EU Pharmacovigilance<br />

legislative revision<br />

Strengthening and rationalizing<br />

the community pharmacovigilance<br />

system, with overall objectives of:<br />

• Better protection of public<br />

health<br />

• Ensuring proper functioning of<br />

the internal European market<br />

• Simplification of current rules<br />

and procedures<br />

©


Where are we now?<br />

• Final text for legislation agreed by<br />

Parliament and Council on 23 June 2010<br />

• Final voting at European Parliament<br />

22nd September 2010<br />

• Publication expected Q1 2011.<br />

- 18 additional months for transposition<br />

©


Commission, Council, Parliament<br />

©


"Enhancing our capacity to detect and collect<br />

adverse drug reactions across the EU, as well as<br />

better coordination with national authorities and<br />

pharmaceutical companies, is a key step towards<br />

making sure risks related to the use of medicinal<br />

products are highlighted in a timely manner and duly<br />

assessed…<br />

“More transparent communication about<br />

pharmacovigilance activities, together with a more<br />

efficient overall system at EU level, will enhance<br />

patients' trust in the medicines they are taking, as<br />

well as in the authorities that guarantee their safety",<br />

©


Key regulatory challenges<br />

following new EU legislation<br />

©


Key regulatory challenges<br />

•New committee set up<br />

•Signal detection<br />

•Worksharing of PSURs<br />

•Decision-making processes<br />

•Transparency<br />

•Post authorisation efficacy studies<br />

©


PV Risk Assessment Committee<br />

Mandate – key role<br />

initial analysis of signals<br />

PSURs and PASS,<br />

agreement of risk<br />

management systems<br />

pharmacovigilance risk<br />

assessments<br />

therapeutic context<br />

Status of PRAC advice<br />

Recommendations to CHMP<br />

and CMDh to be respected, if<br />

not explanation to be given<br />

©


Signal detection<br />

• Wider scope of AR definition:<br />

implications for collection and<br />

database management<br />

• MAH reports direct to<br />

Eudravigilance when meets<br />

functional specifications<br />

• Electronic reporting via<br />

standard form<br />

• Patient reporting<br />

©


Eudravigilance signal function<br />

•Direct evidence that >54%<br />

serious safety issues can be<br />

detected earlier if Eudravigilance<br />

used in addition to other<br />

pharmacovigilance resources<br />

•Analysis of pooled data<br />

Detection of rare ADRs<br />

Earlier as absolute<br />

numbers are greater<br />

Drug Safety 33(6) 475-487<br />

©


Additional monitoring<br />

• New active substances<br />

• New authorisations of biological<br />

products (including biosimilars)<br />

• Plus any other, on request of<br />

NCAs (+PRAC) for products with<br />

specific requirements in RMP<br />

▼<br />

• Specific symbol and text in SPC,<br />

PIL<br />

• 5 years or once conditions met,<br />

whichever last<br />

©


Worksharing of PSURs<br />

• PSUR (routine) waivers: generics, herbals, but not<br />

for hybrids and informed consent<br />

• No waiver if justified by NCAs +PRAC:<br />

- PhV concern, innovator out of the market.<br />

• Assessment report to be adopted by CHMP or CG<br />

only in case of proposed changes to MA conditions<br />

©


Current PSUR worksharing<br />

Allocated P-RMS for PSUR Work-Sharing<br />

80<br />

70<br />

69<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

56<br />

50<br />

47<br />

41<br />

34<br />

31<br />

25<br />

26<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18 17<br />

16 17<br />

12<br />

12<br />

7<br />

7<br />

4 4<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1<br />

AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE EL ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK UK<br />

Member State<br />

©


Decision-making procedures<br />

• Two procedures as result of PhVig<br />

data, depending on urgency:<br />

- Article 31<br />

- Article 107i (urgent procedure)<br />

• To be applied to all products (inc<br />

centrally authorised) when<br />

authorised in more than 1 MS<br />

• Possibility of public hearings:<br />

general principles, PRAC decides,<br />

future EMA guidelines.<br />

©


Transparency & Communication<br />

• EMA to set up and maintain<br />

European medicines web portal<br />

• Summary of committee meetings<br />

regarding PhVig activities<br />

• Risk management plans<br />

• List of medicines under<br />

additional monitoring<br />

• Initiation of safety procedures<br />

©


Post authorisation efficacy<br />

studies<br />

• Duly justified requirement from<br />

competent authorities<br />

• At the time of the granting of MA or<br />

later, different scenarios:<br />

- Data that can only be obtained<br />

after MA grant<br />

- Scientific/methodological advances<br />

• Further elaboration on different<br />

situations where PAES required<br />

©


Moving from risk management<br />

to benefit risk management<br />

©


Regulatory evolution<br />

3. Proactive benefit risk<br />

management, throughout<br />

product life cycle<br />

1. Risk detection<br />

Individual case reports<br />

2. Risk management<br />

–pharmacovigilance plans,<br />

risk minimisation<br />

1980s 2005 2010<br />

22<br />

©


Moving from RMP to BRMP<br />

• What have we learnt so far?<br />

- experience with PASS and RMPs<br />

- advanced therapy medicines<br />

• Updating RMP Guidelines<br />

• New methodologies, research capacity<br />

• International perspectives<br />

• Communication challenges<br />

©


Example - sibutramine<br />

NEJM,<br />

2010,<br />

Sept 2<br />

James<br />

et al<br />

©


Experience with RMPs<br />

Giezen et al 2009<br />

Drug Safety 32(12) 1175<br />

©


Updating of RMP Guideline<br />

• Modular approach<br />

• Incorporate efficacy<br />

guidance<br />

• Active substance based<br />

• Draft by end 2010<br />

©


B:R management - challenges<br />

• Access to robust evidence on<br />

emerging risk in post authorisation<br />

phase<br />

• Good data on how medicine is<br />

being used in practice<br />

• Good data on background rates in<br />

exposed population<br />

• Time dimension – evolving<br />

evidence throughout life cycle<br />

• Benefit risk not (well) quantified at<br />

time of authorisation<br />

©


Innovative Medicines Initiative<br />

Public Private Partnership<br />

PROTECT Pharmepi<br />

Research on Outcomes<br />

of Therapeutics by EU<br />

ConsorTium<br />

Work packages looking at<br />

innovative methods,<br />

including integration of<br />

data on benefit risk and<br />

graphical representation<br />

©


• ENCePP = European Network of<br />

centres for Pharmacovigilance and<br />

Pharmacoepidemiology<br />

• Aim is to facilitate conduct of highquality,<br />

multi-centre, independent<br />

post-authorisation studies<br />

focussing on safety and benefit:risk<br />

• 90 centres, plus specialist networks<br />

©


The benefits of ENCePP will be:<br />

• To identify, characterise and<br />

promote access to PhVig /<br />

PhEpi resources in Europe<br />

• Improve research standards<br />

• “ENCePP seal”<br />

• Increase independence and<br />

transparency in research<br />

• Stimulate collaboration and<br />

exchange of information and<br />

experience<br />

©


International perspectives<br />

“There is no defined and tested algorithm or<br />

summary metric that combines benefit and risk and<br />

that might permit straightforward quantitative<br />

comparisons of different treatment options which in<br />

turn might aid in decision making”<br />

CIOMS Working Group IV<br />

“Benefit - Risk<br />

Balance for<br />

Marketed Drugs:<br />

Evaluating<br />

Safety Signals”<br />

©


CIOMS Working Group IX<br />

On practical considerations for development and<br />

application of a toolkit for medicinal product risk<br />

management<br />

“CIOMS IX plans to develop a pragmatic consensus<br />

guideline to be used by industry and regulators …<br />

A harmonised list of tools for managing risks of<br />

medicinal products which can be applied globally, as<br />

well as potential application of these tools”<br />

April 2010<br />

©


B:R communication challenges<br />

• Better ways of expressing benefit risk<br />

• Greater lay and patient involvement in processes<br />

• Public education on benefit risk<br />

©


Active communication of benefit risk<br />

PRESS RELEASE<br />

CHMP concluded that the<br />

benefits of Thalidomide<br />

outweigh its risks for treatment<br />

of multiple myeloma….<br />

Clinical studies have shown that<br />

adding Thalidomide can prolong<br />

survival time by about 18 months<br />

in newly-diagnosed multiple<br />

myeloma patients over 65 years<br />

of age as compared to patients….<br />

©


Summary<br />

• New EU Pharmacovigilance legislation<br />

will strengthen and simplify systems –<br />

sound rationale and public health goal<br />

• New legislation creates challenges,<br />

opportunity to move to benefit risk<br />

management<br />

• Better methodologies and tools are<br />

needed, and better public<br />

communication of benefit risk is key to<br />

moving forward<br />

©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!