02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3.0 Vehicle Design<br />

3.1 Wing Sizing<br />

determine the individual effect on lift and power. With the insight provided by this single-variable<br />

analysis, a multivariable analysis will be per<strong>for</strong>med to produce an optimized vehicle<br />

configuration.<br />

As shown in Figure 3-5, the loading on the wing will vary depending on the wing geometry and<br />

operational conditions. Because the wing structure mass is based on the loading experienced by<br />

the wing, the mass of the wing structure will also change. This will affect the relative lifting<br />

capacity of the vehicle. Relative lifting capacity (m r ) is defined as the total mass the Entomopter<br />

can lift (m t ) minus the mass of the wings (m w ).<br />

mr = mt - mw<br />

Equation 3-7<br />

The mass the Entomopter can lift is the vertical lift component of the resultant lift shown in<br />

Figure 3-5. The lift generated by the wings is also used as the means of <strong>for</strong>ward propulsion <strong>for</strong><br />

the Entomopter. There<strong>for</strong>e, when calculating the total lift generated by the Entomopter based on<br />

the resultant velocity, given by Equation 3-6, the drag-<strong>for</strong>ce vector must be subtracted to calculate<br />

the portion of lift used to maintain the vehicle in flight. The drag on the vehicle due to <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

motion (D) is given by Equation 3-8.<br />

D = 1 2 ρV 2 c d S w<br />

Equation 3-8<br />

The total vehicle wetted surface area (S w ) is given by Equation 3-9, where the area of the Entomopter<br />

body was assumed to be 0.5 m 2 . The total drag coefficient (c d ) <strong>for</strong> the vehicle was<br />

assumed to be 0.3. Based on this drag calculation the effective lift (L e ) of the Entomopter is<br />

given by Equation 3-10.<br />

S w = 2A w (4) + 0.05<br />

Equation 3-9<br />

L e = L 2 − D 2<br />

Equation 3-10<br />

A relative lifting capacity is a much more useful characteristic of Entomopter per<strong>for</strong>mance than<br />

the total lift generated by the wings. By factoring out the wing mass a truer representation of the<br />

vehicle’s relative per<strong>for</strong>mance under various operating conditions is achieved. Wing mass is<br />

dependent on the structural analysis described in the Entomopter wing structure section. The<br />

biggest effect on wing mass is the size of the wing. The relation between wing mass and size is<br />

shown in Figure 3-8.<br />

To examine the effect of the various operational parameters on the lift and power requirement<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Entomopter, a base operating configuration must be established. From this base operating<br />

point the variables, such as flapping rate, flapping angle, and wing length will be individually<br />

varied. Initially in-flight cruise conditions were examined. This assumed a flight speed (V) <strong>for</strong><br />

the vehicle of 15 m/s and a C L generated by the wings of 10. This lift coefficient was based on<br />

the baseline lift coefficient of 5 <strong>for</strong> the flapping wing and the estimated doubling or tripling<br />

enhancement due to active boundary layer blowing at the trailing edge of the wing. The analysis<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!