02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Planetary Exploration Using Biomimetics<br />

An Entomopter <strong>for</strong> Flight on Mars<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

13.8 Mpa (2000 psi)<br />

34.5 Mpa (5000 psi)<br />

68.9 Mpa (10,000 psi)<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5<br />

Hydrogen Mass Stored (kg)<br />

Figure 3-149: Tank Radius as a Function of Storage Pressure <strong>for</strong> Various Hydrogen Mass<br />

The material utilized in constructing the tank can be either a metal such as steel, titanium, aluminum<br />

or a composite. Since most composites are porous to hydrogen, a composite tank will<br />

require a liner to prevent the hydrogen from migrating through the tank wall. Liner materials are<br />

usually a type of polymer or a metal such as aluminum. Also, coatings are being investigated as<br />

a lightweight means of preventing hydrogen penetration through the tank. Composite tanks offer<br />

the best weight density of hydrogen. Tanks under development at Quantum Technologies have<br />

achieved up to 11.3% hydrogen by weight. However, a more realistic number <strong>for</strong> composite<br />

storage tanks in practical use is between 7.5% and 8.5% weight of hydrogen.<br />

In addition to the stress placed on the tank due to the pressure-loading additional issues will<br />

arise when using a high-pressure tank <strong>for</strong> space applications. These issues include radiation<br />

effects, thermal cycling, aging, creep, fatigue, and hydrogen embitterment. Depending on the<br />

tank material chosen, the design life and the operating pressure each of these factors would need<br />

to be investigated to determine their effects on a particular tank design.<br />

To maximize the storage volume <strong>for</strong> a given tank placement, the ideal configuration would be to<br />

construct a con<strong>for</strong>mal tank. A con<strong>for</strong>mal tank can hold up to 20% more hydrogen in a given<br />

envelope and pressure then a cylindrical or spherical tank. This presumes that a con<strong>for</strong>mal tank<br />

184<br />

<strong>Phase</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!