02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3.0 Vehicle Design<br />

3.5 Fuel Storage and Production<br />

piston, similar to that of a conventional internal combustion engine. However, there are a number<br />

of issues associated with the used of this type of fuel. Mainly, the solid metal oxides will<br />

condense within the combustion cylinder and potentially clog the engine and be a source of wear<br />

on the piston.<br />

The main products of the combustion reactions listed in Table 3-18 are condensed metal oxide<br />

and CO. Of these, Mg is the easiest to ignite and has the highest burn rate, which is necessary to<br />

produce the required gas pressure <strong>for</strong> operation of the vehicle.<br />

Magnesium oxide, which makes up about 7.8% of the soil on Mars, is present in significant<br />

enough quantities to potentially mine the soil <strong>for</strong> the magnesium that is needed. If the magnesium<br />

can be effectively separated out of the soil, it will probably need to be dissolved in solution<br />

to make it usable as a propellant [278, 279]. One potential candidate would be methanol<br />

(CH 3 OH). However, the use of this type of fluid would require a supply of hydrogen as well as<br />

the ability to separate out carbon and oxygen from the atmosphere. This diminishes the attractiveness<br />

of a system that utilizes the CO 2 directly out of the Mars atmosphere. Based on results<br />

given in References 278 and 279, there are other significant issues with using methanol or any<br />

other fluid as a carrier <strong>for</strong> the magnesium. The magnesium would tend to settle out of the mixture,<br />

requiring frequent mixing. Also, the carrier fluid would need to evaporate be<strong>for</strong>e ignition of<br />

the magnesium would take place. There may be other carrier fluids that would better than methanol;<br />

however, a different approach using a gas as the carrier might work.<br />

A gas would eliminate the problems of evaporation and mixing, as well as the issues associated<br />

with the production of the carrier fluid. The ideal gas to use would be the Mars atmosphere<br />

itself. It may be possible to devise a mixing chamber on board the vehicle that would be used to<br />

mix the magnesium and atmosphere (CO 2 ) prior to injection into the combustion chamber. The<br />

atmosphere could be pumped in at a rate that would stir up the magnesium particles and <strong>for</strong>m a<br />

suspension of magnesium power within the tank. The magnesium could be gravity-fed into this<br />

mixing chamber at a rate that would maintain the correct concentration of magnesium within the<br />

chamber (similar to sand falling through an hourglass). The rate of magnesium power that enters<br />

this mixing chamber could be controlled by changing the size of the orifice through which the<br />

magnesium power passes. This suspension could then be injected into the combustion chamber.<br />

This scheme would not require any gas production and would utilize a fairly simple control<br />

scheme of adjusting the atmosphere injector and opening to the magnesium power tank. The<br />

mixing chamber would need to be large enough to allow the magnesium to be suspended at the<br />

correct mixture ratio prior to being injected into the chamber.<br />

The design and evaluation of a CO 2 burning engine is beyond the scope of this ef<strong>for</strong>t; however,<br />

the concept has some potential benefits and may be worth evaluating in further detail during any<br />

future ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

3.5.3 Propellant Production and Storage<br />

To evaluate the tradeoff between carrying hydrogen and producing fuel on Mars or just carrying<br />

the fuel directly, the overall mass of a system that produces fuel on the surface will be estimated,<br />

and this will be compared to the amount of fuel that can be carried directly from Earth utilizing<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!