Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts
Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts
Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3.0 Vehicle Design<br />
3.5 Fuel Storage and Production<br />
piston, similar to that of a conventional internal combustion engine. However, there are a number<br />
of issues associated with the used of this type of fuel. Mainly, the solid metal oxides will<br />
condense within the combustion cylinder and potentially clog the engine and be a source of wear<br />
on the piston.<br />
The main products of the combustion reactions listed in Table 3-18 are condensed metal oxide<br />
and CO. Of these, Mg is the easiest to ignite and has the highest burn rate, which is necessary to<br />
produce the required gas pressure <strong>for</strong> operation of the vehicle.<br />
Magnesium oxide, which makes up about 7.8% of the soil on Mars, is present in significant<br />
enough quantities to potentially mine the soil <strong>for</strong> the magnesium that is needed. If the magnesium<br />
can be effectively separated out of the soil, it will probably need to be dissolved in solution<br />
to make it usable as a propellant [278, 279]. One potential candidate would be methanol<br />
(CH 3 OH). However, the use of this type of fluid would require a supply of hydrogen as well as<br />
the ability to separate out carbon and oxygen from the atmosphere. This diminishes the attractiveness<br />
of a system that utilizes the CO 2 directly out of the Mars atmosphere. Based on results<br />
given in References 278 and 279, there are other significant issues with using methanol or any<br />
other fluid as a carrier <strong>for</strong> the magnesium. The magnesium would tend to settle out of the mixture,<br />
requiring frequent mixing. Also, the carrier fluid would need to evaporate be<strong>for</strong>e ignition of<br />
the magnesium would take place. There may be other carrier fluids that would better than methanol;<br />
however, a different approach using a gas as the carrier might work.<br />
A gas would eliminate the problems of evaporation and mixing, as well as the issues associated<br />
with the production of the carrier fluid. The ideal gas to use would be the Mars atmosphere<br />
itself. It may be possible to devise a mixing chamber on board the vehicle that would be used to<br />
mix the magnesium and atmosphere (CO 2 ) prior to injection into the combustion chamber. The<br />
atmosphere could be pumped in at a rate that would stir up the magnesium particles and <strong>for</strong>m a<br />
suspension of magnesium power within the tank. The magnesium could be gravity-fed into this<br />
mixing chamber at a rate that would maintain the correct concentration of magnesium within the<br />
chamber (similar to sand falling through an hourglass). The rate of magnesium power that enters<br />
this mixing chamber could be controlled by changing the size of the orifice through which the<br />
magnesium power passes. This suspension could then be injected into the combustion chamber.<br />
This scheme would not require any gas production and would utilize a fairly simple control<br />
scheme of adjusting the atmosphere injector and opening to the magnesium power tank. The<br />
mixing chamber would need to be large enough to allow the magnesium to be suspended at the<br />
correct mixture ratio prior to being injected into the chamber.<br />
The design and evaluation of a CO 2 burning engine is beyond the scope of this ef<strong>for</strong>t; however,<br />
the concept has some potential benefits and may be worth evaluating in further detail during any<br />
future ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />
3.5.3 Propellant Production and Storage<br />
To evaluate the tradeoff between carrying hydrogen and producing fuel on Mars or just carrying<br />
the fuel directly, the overall mass of a system that produces fuel on the surface will be estimated,<br />
and this will be compared to the amount of fuel that can be carried directly from Earth utilizing<br />
179