02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3.0 Vehicle Design<br />

3.4 Reciprocating Chemical Muscle<br />

The RCM is a regenerative device that converts chemical energy into motion through a direct<br />

noncombustive chemical reaction. Hence, the concept of a “muscle” as opposed to an engine.<br />

There is no combustion taking place nor is there an ignition system required. The RCM is not<br />

only capable of producing autonomic wing flapping as well as small amounts of electricity <strong>for</strong><br />

control of MEMS devices and the “nervous system” of the Entomopter, but it creates enough gas<br />

to energize circulation-controlled airfoils. This means that simple autonomic (involuntary,<br />

uncontrolled) wing flapping of constant frequency and equal amplitude can result in directional<br />

control of the Entomopter by varying the coefficient of lift (CL) on each of the wings, thereby<br />

inducing a roll moment about the body of the Entomopter while in flight. Figure 3-135 shows<br />

'milli-scaled' wing structures grown in the <strong>Institute</strong>'s stereolithography and fused deposition<br />

modeling machines. Wings like these will not only act as smart structures to create a proper<br />

angles of attack under opposite aerodynamic loads during the up beat and down beat, but the<br />

hollow micro-channels in the ribs provide circulation control gas from the RCM to “blow” the<br />

wings <strong>for</strong> directional control in flight as well as lift when the wing is at negative angles of attack<br />

during the up beat.<br />

Figure 3-135: Wing Structures Grown in Georgia Tech’s Stereolithography and Fused<br />

Deposition Modeling Machines.<br />

The implementation of a RCM is motivated chiefly by the basic necessity <strong>for</strong> very high rate of<br />

energy release from compact energy sources. Electrically-driven systems suffer from the poor<br />

energy density of batteries, while electrical actuators are typically dense (heavy), or suffer from<br />

insufficient <strong>for</strong>ce and motion as in the case of electrostatic or piezoelectric propulsors. To<br />

increase motion, piezoelectric ceramics can be stacked, but this leads to greater weight, stiffness,<br />

and often higher required voltages. Rheological fluids can be slow to respond and will there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

be difficult to use with flapping wing implementations requiring beat frequencies of 20 to 50 Hz.<br />

Faster acting polymeric muscles have been demonstrated, but require high actuation voltages,<br />

dictating the need <strong>for</strong> power conversion circuits which add weight and loss to the already heavy<br />

onboard battery pack. Actuators of NITINOL wire are totally out of the question due to the significant<br />

current requirements and variable per<strong>for</strong>mance under environmental extremes.<br />

The RCM was originally conceived as an actuator <strong>for</strong> the flapping wing of a small insect-like<br />

terrestrial entomopter. (See Figure 3-136.) It had a reciprocation rate limited by inertia and fric-<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!