02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planetary Exploration Using Biomimetics<br />

An Entomopter <strong>for</strong> Flight on Mars<br />

superimposed onto the model proposed by Eric Reissner [222]. Since the model proposed by<br />

Theoderson involves a harmonic motion analysis with real and imaginary parts, it was decided<br />

that motion in two degrees of freedom would be modeled as real parts and equations provided by<br />

Azuma [12] would be used. The <strong>for</strong>mulation was initially done <strong>for</strong> a baseline configuration, and<br />

once the model was <strong>for</strong>mulated and validated by CFD results, the analytical model was used to<br />

explore the design space based on a parametric analysis.<br />

This model does not account <strong>for</strong> the airfoil shape, instead being considered as a thin flat plate,<br />

which is close to the actual case as the proposed wing design is very thin, however, camber<br />

effects are also not taken into account. The three dimensional effects <strong>for</strong> wing plan<strong>for</strong>m shape,<br />

sweep, and change of chord length with span is modeled in terms of correction factors <strong>for</strong> both<br />

flapping and pitch motion. These correction factors are then added to the results of the two<br />

dimensional model to complete the analysis.<br />

Having considered the nature of the modeling, the next step was to select the engineering metrics<br />

which should comprise evaluation criteria <strong>for</strong> analysis and design. Basically lift and thrust<br />

are the main factors, and the net lift should be able to support the weight of the vehicle and net<br />

thrust should provide the <strong>for</strong>ward flight capability. In addition to these two, the moment and<br />

power required are the other key metrics. All these things in non dimensional <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> their<br />

respective coefficients were selected as the key responses, in order to assess the flight worthiness<br />

of the flapping wing Entomopter on Mars.<br />

After having selected the key responses, the next step is selection of key variables that are sensitive<br />

to the variability of these responses. The variables are:<br />

• Wing span<br />

• Chord length<br />

• Flapping frequency in Hertz<br />

• Flapping amplitude<br />

• Pivot location from leading edge<br />

• Angle of attack<br />

• Pitch amplitude<br />

• <strong>Phase</strong> between pitch and plunge<br />

• Free stream density<br />

• Free stream velocity<br />

• Free stream kinematic viscosity<br />

The model is unsteady and the responses are varying within each time period of motion, however,<br />

motion is harmonic and is the same <strong>for</strong> each time period. To simplify the model, flow is<br />

assumed inviscid, thereby eliminating the viscosity variable. Also the density of Mars lower<br />

atmosphere is assumed constant <strong>for</strong> nap-of-the-planet flight.<br />

3.3.3.4 Detailed Aerodynamic Analysis<br />

The problem of determining the aerodynamic <strong>for</strong>ces on an airfoil moving in simple harmonic<br />

motion about an equilibrium position is very detailed, and is fully derived in Reference [254]. At<br />

this point, a qualitative explanation of basic concepts is attempted.<br />

124<br />

<strong>Phase</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!