02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Planetary Exploration Using Biomimetics<br />

An Entomopter <strong>for</strong> Flight on Mars<br />

Figures 3-96 through 3-98 show the streamwise velocity contours. The z = -0.5m station shows<br />

a marked difference from the unblown case. The blowing and the resulting Coanda effect have<br />

resulted in the absence of flow separation on the top wing. This is the desired effect.<br />

Note that in Figure 3-98, the trailing edge blowing at this station turns the flow down as desired<br />

(perhaps 30°), however downward turning of 90 degrees is possible, producing a corresponding<br />

increase in lift (in fact, wind tunnel tests have demonstrated that the local flow can be turned<br />

180° using blown surfaces under correct circumstances). Within the time and funding allocated<br />

to the CFD analyses per<strong>for</strong>med on this NIAC <strong>Phase</strong> <strong>II</strong> study, it was not possible to identify an<br />

optimal point in the design space where slot velocities and blown flap geometries would result in<br />

optimum lift while the airfoil is being blown under Mars atmospheric conditions. The CFD<br />

results shown demonstrate that increases in lift can be attained <strong>for</strong> the Entomopter wing on<br />

Mars, but by no means indicate the maximum potential to be gained in doing so. For the design<br />

point chosen (14 m/s <strong>for</strong>ward flight and 6 m/s wing flapping over a 150° angle) a 100 m/s blowing<br />

velocity yields <strong>for</strong>ces on the order of 0.08125 Newtons with blowing whereas the unblown<br />

wing only exhibits 0.046875 Newtons according to this single point CFD analysis (as shown in<br />

Figures 3-90 and 3-95). Empirical wind tunnel data have shown analogous test set ups to produce<br />

improvements in the range of 5 to 10 times this. [80, 82]<br />

It is clear that the point in the design space is not optimum and while the present CFD model can<br />

to be refined, the choice of better operating parameters is also necessary. This parametric analysis<br />

will be conducted with the help of the analytical <strong>for</strong>mulations developed during this study to<br />

define the “sweet spots” <strong>for</strong> operation within the overall design space. This work (<strong>for</strong> the<br />

unsteady blown flapping case) is being carried out as a Ph.D. research topic and will be further<br />

pursued in follow-on research ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />

Figure 3-96: U Velocity Contours on Symmetry Plane<br />

106<br />

<strong>Phase</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!