02.11.2014 Views

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

Phase II Final Report - NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3.0 Vehicle Design<br />

3.3 Wing Aerodynamics<br />

Figure 3-71: Pressure Contours, α = 45.79 o , Reynolds Number = 5,100, Time = 3.6848 s<br />

3.3.1.4.1 Low Reynolds Number, High-α Results<br />

A new cambered, thin wing modeled after the North American cicada wing was used in this<br />

series of simulations. Chord Reynolds number was varied in the range 510-5,100. A high angle<br />

of attack value was used to characterize the <strong>for</strong>mation and evolution of the LEV. These timeaccurate<br />

simulations were done using a very fine mesh and small integration time step. Both the<br />

mesh size and the time step were varied and the corresponding simulation results compared to<br />

ensure the results can be treated as independent of mesh size and time step.<br />

Figures 3-72 and 3-73 show, respectively, the lift and drag coefficient variations <strong>for</strong> U = 1.4 m/s<br />

(Reynolds number = 510, Case A) and α = 34.8 o . The corresponding plots <strong>for</strong> U = 14 m/s (Reynolds<br />

number = 5,100, Case D) are shown in Figures 3-74 and 3-75. These four plots reveal several<br />

interesting characteristics not emphasized in previous work by other investigators of low<br />

Reynolds number, high angle of attack flow. Both cases show that there are distinct frequencies<br />

associated with each, and both the lift and drag variations have fairly large amplitudes. The<br />

salient features are summarized in Table 3-7. These results indicate that the flow is dominated<br />

by the <strong>for</strong>mation and shedding of the LEV. The LEV <strong>for</strong>ms at the leading edge, stays attached to<br />

the top surface and grows as it convects downstream. During this phase, the airfoil has a high C L<br />

value, and then it drops as the vortex detaches from the surface, leading to the low C L phase of<br />

the cycle. The c d variation has a phase difference of approximately 180 o from the C L variation.<br />

From the summary results given in Table 3-7, several useful design guidelines can be drawn. For<br />

example, <strong>for</strong> Case D (Reynolds number = 5,100) the dominant frequency is f ~ 7.23 Hz. To<br />

investigate the relationship to the well known Karman vortex shedding from bluff bodies, the<br />

Strouhal number, defined as<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!