02.11.2014 Views

Institutional Equities - Online Share Trading

Institutional Equities - Online Share Trading

Institutional Equities - Online Share Trading

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mar-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

Jul-10<br />

Aug-10<br />

Sep-10<br />

Oct-10<br />

Nov-10<br />

Dec-10<br />

Jan-11<br />

Feb-11<br />

Mar-11<br />

Apr-11<br />

May-11<br />

Jun-11<br />

Jul-11<br />

Aug-11<br />

Sep-11<br />

FY02<br />

FY03<br />

<strong>Institutional</strong> <strong>Equities</strong><br />

FY04<br />

FY05<br />

FY06<br />

FY07<br />

FY08<br />

FY09<br />

FY10<br />

FY11<br />

FY12E<br />

FY13E<br />

FY14E<br />

FY15E<br />

Exhibit 47: Merchant power tariff<br />

(Rs/KWh) June - Sep 09<br />

12<br />

Rs5.9KWh<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

June - Sep 10<br />

Rs3.2KWh<br />

June - Sep 11<br />

Rs2.82KWh<br />

Source:IEX<br />

Fuel security is critical issue<br />

Currently, 65% of India’s installed power capacity (112GW) is coal-based and 80% of coal requirement is met<br />

through domestic sources. Going ahead, the commissioning of incremental capacity of 82GW (70% of<br />

incremental capacity addition-thermal based) in the next three years would push up incremental coal imports<br />

to 124mtpa over FY11-15E. We believe that constrained infrastructure at ports and unavailability of railway<br />

wagons to despatch coal to the hinterland would be a major hurdle in the import of coal. Hence, lower coal<br />

imports and moderate growth in domestic coal production would compel power plants to operate at a lower<br />

PLF (plant load factor). Based on our analysis in respect of capacity addition and fuel requirement, the power<br />

plants would operate in the range of 75% to 79% of their capacity.<br />

Exhibit 48: Coal demand for power generation<br />

Merchant prices<br />

FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E<br />

Coal demand (mt) 411 445 484 553 631 719<br />

Generation capacity (mw) 84,198 93,918 102,631 117,737 132,550 147,222<br />

PLF (%) 77.5 76.0 76.0 76.0 77.0 79.0<br />

Operating capacity (mw) 65,254 71,378 78,000 89,480 102,064 116,306<br />

Units produced (mn) 571,623 625,271 683,279 783,848 894,079 1,018,838<br />

Gross calorific value (Kcal/kg) 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600<br />

Heat rate (kWh/ Kcal) 2,588 2,560 2,550 2,542 2,540 2,540<br />

Source: CEA, Energy Statistics, Nirmal Bang <strong>Institutional</strong> <strong>Equities</strong> Research<br />

Average<br />

Exhibit 49: Thermal coal import for power generation<br />

Y/E March (mt)<br />

FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E<br />

Exhibit 50: PLF trend<br />

(%)<br />

81<br />

Coal demand (for power generation) 411 445 484 553 639 728<br />

79<br />

Coal production (for power generation) 367 385 404 429 454 482<br />

Incremental coal production - 18 19 24 26 27<br />

Thermal coal imports 44 60 80 125 185 246<br />

Imports ( adjusted for calorific value) 27 37 49 77 115 153<br />

77<br />

75<br />

73<br />

71<br />

69<br />

Incremental imports - 9 12 28 37 38<br />

Source: CEA, Energy Statistics, Nirmal Bang <strong>Institutional</strong> <strong>Equities</strong> Research<br />

Source: CEA, Nirmal Bang <strong>Institutional</strong> <strong>Equities</strong> Research<br />

21 Infrastructure Sector

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!