01.11.2014 Views

District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...

District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...

District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DLHS -2<br />

DLHS-2<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong><br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

International Institute for<br />

Population Sciences,<br />

(Deemed University)<br />

Mumbai-400088<br />

Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> & Family<br />

Welfare, Government of India,<br />

New Delhi-110011<br />

Society for Applied Research<br />

in Humanities,<br />

New Delhi-110067


Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS - 2)<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

International Institute for<br />

Population Sciences,<br />

(Deemed University)<br />

Mumbai – 400 088<br />

Government of India,<br />

Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> &<br />

Family Welfare,<br />

New Delhi- 110 011<br />

Society for Applied Research<br />

in Humanities<br />

New Delhi – 110 067


CONTRIBUTORS<br />

Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi<br />

O. P. Vig<br />

Ummed Singh<br />

Ghanshyam Upadhyay<br />

B. K. Yadav<br />

Ajay Tripathi<br />

Ravikesh<br />

International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai<br />

F. Ram<br />

B. Paswan<br />

L. Ladu Singh<br />

Akash Wankhede<br />

Ananta Basudev Sahu


CONTENTS<br />

Page<br />

Tables …………………………………………………………………………….……… iv<br />

Figures …………………………………………………………………………..…..…… vii<br />

Maps… …………………………………………………………………..………………. vii<br />

Preface and acknowledgement …………………………………………………………… ix<br />

Key Indicators …………………………………………………………………….……… xi<br />

Salient Findings …………………………………………………………………..……… xiii<br />

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 Background and Objectives of the <strong>Survey</strong> ………...……….………………………. 1<br />

1.2 <strong>Survey</strong> Design..………………………….………..…………….…………………. 1<br />

1.3 House Listing and Sample Selection …………….………….……….……………. 2<br />

1.4 Questionnaire ….……………………………….….………..…………….……….. 3<br />

1.5 Fieldwork and Sample Coverage ……………..…………..……………………….. 4<br />

1.6 Data processing ………………………………………..………………………….. 4<br />

1.7 Sample Weights ………………………………..………………………………….. 5<br />

1.8 Sample Implementation ………………………..………………………………….. 6<br />

1.9 Basic Demographic Profile of the State…….………..………..…………………… 8<br />

CHAPTER II BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLD<br />

2.1 Age –Sex Structure.………………………………………………………………… 11<br />

2.2 <strong>Household</strong> Characteristic ………………………………………………………….. 12<br />

2.3 Educational <strong>Level</strong> .………………………………………………………………… 13<br />

2.4 Marital Status of the <strong>Household</strong> Population ………………………………………. 16<br />

2.5 Marriages ……….…………………………………………………………………. 17<br />

2.6 Morbidity Rates …..……………………………………………………………….. 18<br />

2.7 Morbidity Rates by <strong>District</strong>……………… ………………………………………… 20<br />

2.8 Housing Characteristics …………………………………………………………… 20<br />

2.9 Housing Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>……………...………………………………… 23<br />

2.10 Iodization of Salt …………………………………………………………………… 24<br />

2.11 Iodization of Salt by <strong>District</strong>……………….……………………………………… 25<br />

2.12 Availability of Facilities and Services in <strong>Rural</strong> Population ………………………… 26<br />

2.13 Availability of Education Facility and <strong>Health</strong> Services by <strong>District</strong>………………… 28<br />

CHAPTER III CHARACTRERISTICS OF WOMEN, HUSBANDS AND<br />

FERTILITY<br />

3.1 Background Characteristics of Women …………………………………………… 33<br />

3.2 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Women ……………………………………………………… 34<br />

3.3 Background Characteristics of Husbands’ of Eligible Women …………………… 36<br />

3.4 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Husbands’ of Eligible Women ……………………………… 37<br />

3.5 Children Ever Born and Surviving ………………………………………………… 38<br />

3.6 Completed Fertility by <strong>District</strong>……………. ……………………………………… 38<br />

3.7 Birth Order ………………………………………………………………………… 40<br />

3.8 Birth Order by <strong>District</strong> …………………………………………………………….. 40<br />

3.9 Fertility Preference ………………………………………………………………… 41<br />

3.10 Pregnancy Outcomes ……………………………………………………………… 43


Page<br />

CHAPTER IV MATERNAL HEALTH CARE<br />

4.1<br />

4.2<br />

4.3<br />

4.4<br />

4.5<br />

4.6<br />

4.7<br />

4.8<br />

4.8.1<br />

4.8.2<br />

4.8.3<br />

4.9<br />

4.10<br />

4.11<br />

4.12<br />

Antenatal Check-Ups……………………………………………………………… 45<br />

Antenatal Check-Ups at <strong>Health</strong> Facility…………………………………………… 47<br />

Antenatal Check-Ups by <strong>District</strong>…………………………………………………… 48<br />

Components of Antenatal Check-Ups……………………………………………… 50<br />

Antenatal Care Services…………………………………………………………… 51<br />

Antenatal Care Indicator by <strong>District</strong>.……………………………………………… 56<br />

Pregnancy Complication and Treatment…………………………………………… 57<br />

Delivery Care…………………………………………………………………….… 60<br />

Place of Delivery…………………………………………………………………… 60<br />

Assistance during Home Delivery ………………………………………………… 63<br />

Delivery Assisted by Skilled Person…………………..…………………………… 63<br />

Reasons for Not Going to <strong>Health</strong> Institutions for Delivery………………………… 65<br />

Delivery Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>.………………………………………………. 66<br />

Complication during Delivery….……….…………………………………………. 67<br />

Post Delivery Complication and Treatment ………………………………………. 67<br />

4.13 Obstetric Morbidity by <strong>District</strong>………..……………………………………… 71<br />

CHAPTER V CHILD CARE AND IMMUNIZATION<br />

5.1<br />

5.1.1<br />

5.2<br />

5.3<br />

Breastfeeding……………………………….……………..……………………… 75<br />

Breastfeeding by <strong>District</strong>s………………………………………………………… 78<br />

Immunization of Children………………………………………………………… 78<br />

Source of Immunization…………………………………………………………… 85<br />

5.4 Vitamin A and IFA Supplements…….. ………………………………………… 86<br />

5.5<br />

5.6<br />

5.6.1<br />

5.6.2<br />

5.6.3<br />

5.6.4<br />

Immunization Coverage by <strong>District</strong>.……………………………………………… 88<br />

Child Morbidity and Treatment…………………………………………………… 88<br />

Awareness of Diarrhoea…………………….……………………………………… 88<br />

Treatment of Diarrhoea…………………………………………………………… 90<br />

Awareness of Pneumonia …………………….…………………………………… 92<br />

Treatment of Pneumonia…………………………………………………………… 92<br />

5.6.5 Awareness of Diarrhoea, ORS and Pneumonia and Incidence of Diarrhoea and<br />

Pneumonia by <strong>District</strong>……….. ………………………………………………….. 95<br />

CHAPTER VI FAMILY PLANNING<br />

6.1<br />

6.1.1<br />

6.1.2<br />

6.1.3<br />

6.2<br />

6.2.1<br />

6.2.2<br />

6.2.3<br />

6.3<br />

6.4<br />

6.5<br />

Knowledge of Family Planning Methods…….…………………………………… 97<br />

Knowledge of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong>……………………………… 99<br />

Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV).……………..……………………… 100<br />

Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) by <strong>District</strong>.………..……………… 100<br />

Current Use of Family Planning Methods….……………..……………………… 101<br />

Current Use of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong>.…..………………………… 103<br />

Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Women.……………… 1<strong>04</strong><br />

Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Husbands…………… 106<br />

Reasons for Not Using Male Methods.…….……………..………………………… 107<br />

Source of Contraceptive Methods………….……………..……………………… 107<br />

Problems with Current Use of Contraceptive Method……..……………………… 108<br />

ii


Page<br />

6.6<br />

6.7<br />

6.7.1<br />

6.7.2<br />

6.8<br />

6.8.1<br />

6.9<br />

6.9.1<br />

Treatment for <strong>Health</strong> Problems with Current Use of Contraception……………… 109<br />

Advice to Non-Users to Use Contraception…………..…………………………. 110<br />

Future Intensions……………………………………..…………………………… 111<br />

Future Intension to Use Among Women by Number of Living Children………… 112<br />

Reasons for Discontinuation and Non-Use of Contraception……………………… 112<br />

Reasons for Not Using Contraceptive Methods…………..……………………… 114<br />

Unmet Need for Family Planning Services..……………..………………………… 114<br />

Unmet Need for Family Planning Services by <strong>District</strong>.…..……………………… 116<br />

CHAPTER VII ACCESSIBILITY AND PERCEPTION ABOUT GOVERNMENT<br />

HEALTH FACILITIES<br />

7.1<br />

7.2<br />

7.3<br />

7.4<br />

Home Visit By <strong>Health</strong> Workers……………………..…………………………… 119<br />

Home Visit By <strong>Health</strong> Worker by <strong>District</strong>..……………..………………………… 121<br />

Matter Discussed during Home Visits or Visits to <strong>Health</strong> Facilities.……………… 122<br />

Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility………………….……………..…………………………… 124<br />

7.5 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility by <strong>District</strong>..………….……..…………………………… 124<br />

7.6<br />

7.7<br />

7.8<br />

7.9<br />

7.10<br />

7.11<br />

7.12<br />

Client’s Perception of Quality of Government <strong>Health</strong> Services.………………… 125<br />

Reasons for Not Visiting Government <strong>Health</strong> Centre….………………………… 126<br />

Family Planning Services and Advice Received………….……………………… 126<br />

Availability of Pills and Condom………..…………..…………………………… 127<br />

Quality of Care of Family Planning Services……………..……………………… 128<br />

Quality of Care Indicators for Contraceptive Users by <strong>District</strong>.……….………… 129<br />

Quality of Care of Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Care….……………..………………………… 130<br />

CHAPTER VIII REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROBLEMS AND AWARENESS<br />

OF RTIs/STIs and HIV/AIDS<br />

8.1<br />

8.1.1<br />

8.2<br />

8.3<br />

8.4<br />

8.5<br />

8.5.1<br />

8.5.2<br />

8.5.3<br />

8.5.4<br />

8.5.5<br />

8.6<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI……………………………………………………………… 133<br />

Knowledge of Mode of Transmission of RTI/STI………………………………… 136<br />

Prevalence of RTI/STI……………….. …………………………………………… 138<br />

Menstruation Related Problems…………………………………………………… 143<br />

Prevalence of RTI/STI by <strong>District</strong>.………………………………………………… 144<br />

HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………………………… 145<br />

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………… 145<br />

Knowledge of Mode of Transmission about HIV/AIDS…………………………… 149<br />

How to avoid HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………… 150<br />

Misconception about HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………… 154<br />

Knowledge of Curability of HIV/AIDS…………………………………………… 155<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by <strong>District</strong>.…………….…………………… 157<br />

APPENDICES<br />

Appendix A Estimation of Sampling Errors ……………………….…………….… 159<br />

Appendix B DLHS Staff …………………………………………………………..… 165<br />

Appendix C Questionnaire ……………………………………………………..…… 169<br />

iii


Table 1.1<br />

Table 1.2<br />

Table 1.3<br />

Table 2.1<br />

Table 2.2<br />

Table 2.3<br />

Table 2.4<br />

Table 2.5<br />

Table 2.6<br />

Table 2.7<br />

Table 2.8<br />

Table 2.9<br />

Table 2.10<br />

Table 2.11<br />

Table 2.12<br />

Table 2.13<br />

Table 2.14<br />

Table 2.15<br />

Table 3.1<br />

Table 3.2<br />

Table 3.3<br />

Table 3.4<br />

Table 3.5<br />

Table 3.6<br />

Table 3.7<br />

Table 3.8<br />

Table 3.9<br />

Table 3.10<br />

Table 4.1<br />

Table 4.2<br />

Table 4.3<br />

Table 4.4<br />

Table 4.5<br />

Table 4.6<br />

Table 4.7<br />

Table 4.8<br />

Table 4.9<br />

Table 4.10<br />

Table 4.11<br />

Table 4.12<br />

Table 4.13<br />

Table 4.14<br />

Table 4.15<br />

Table 4.16<br />

TABLES<br />

Page<br />

Number of households interviewed…………….…………………..………. 7<br />

Number of women and husband interviewed……….…………………..…… 7<br />

Basic demographic indicator ……………………………………………..… 9<br />

<strong>Household</strong> population by age and sex …………………………………..…… 12<br />

<strong>Household</strong> characteristics ………………………….……………………..… 13<br />

Educational level of the household population …………………………..… 14<br />

Marital status of the household population ……………………………..…… 17<br />

Marriage ……………………………………………………………..……… 18<br />

Morbidity rates ……………………….…………………………………..… 19<br />

Morbidity rates by district……… …………………………………..……… 20<br />

Housing characteristics …………………………………………………..… 22<br />

Housing characteristics by district……….. ………………………..………. 23<br />

Iodization of salt…………………………………………………………..… 24<br />

Iodization of salt by district……… ………………………………..………. 26<br />

Distance from the nearest education facility …………………………..…… 27<br />

Distance from the nearest health facility ………………………………..…… 27<br />

Availability of services …………………………………………………..… 28<br />

Availability of facility and services by district…………. …………..……… 29<br />

Background characteristics of women …………………………………..…… 34<br />

<strong>Level</strong> of education of eligible women …………………………………..…… 35<br />

Background characteristics of men ……………………………………..…… 36<br />

<strong>Level</strong> of education of men ………………………………………………..… 37<br />

Children ever born and living …………………………………………..…… 39<br />

Children ever born and living by district ………………………………..…… 40<br />

Birth order ……………………………………………………………..…… 41<br />

Birth order by district …………………………………………………..…… 43<br />

Fertility preference ……………………………………………………..…… 44<br />

Outcomes of pregnancy ……….………………………………………..…… 44<br />

Antenatal check-up ……………………………………………………..…… 46<br />

Place of antenatal check-up ……………………………………………..…… 49<br />

Antenatal check-ups by district …………………………………………..… 50<br />

Components of antenatal check-ups ……………………………………..… 51<br />

Antenatal care ………………………………….…………………..………. 53<br />

Antenatal care indicators by district ……………………………………..… 57<br />

Pregnancy complications …….……………………………………..……… 58<br />

Treatment for pregnancy complications ………………………………..…… 60<br />

Place of delivery…………………………………………………………..… 62<br />

Assistance during home delivery and safe delivery ……………………..…… 64<br />

Reasons for not going to health institutions for delivery ………………..…… 66<br />

Delivery characteristics by district ……………………………………..…… 67<br />

Delivery complications …………………………………………………..… 68<br />

Post delivery complications ……………………………………..………. 69<br />

Treatment for post delivery complications……………………………….… 71<br />

Pregnancy, delivery and post delivery complications………………………. 72<br />

iv


Table 5.1<br />

Table 5.2<br />

Table 5.3<br />

Table 5.4<br />

Table 5.5<br />

Table 5.6<br />

Table 5.7<br />

Table 5.8<br />

Table 5.9<br />

Table 5.10<br />

Table 5.11<br />

Table 5.12<br />

Table 5.13<br />

Table 6.1<br />

Table 6.2<br />

Table 6.3<br />

Table 6.4<br />

Table 6.5<br />

Table 6.6<br />

Table 6.7<br />

Table 6.8<br />

Table 6.9<br />

Table 6.10<br />

Table 6.11<br />

Table 6.12<br />

Table 6.13<br />

Table 6.14<br />

Table 6.15<br />

Table 6.16<br />

Table 6.17<br />

Table 6.18<br />

Table 6.19<br />

Table 7.1<br />

Table 7.2<br />

Table 7.3<br />

Table 7.4<br />

Table 7.5<br />

Table 7.6<br />

Table 7.7<br />

Table 7.8<br />

Table 7.9<br />

Table 7.10<br />

Page<br />

Initiation of breastfeeding ………………………………………………..… 76<br />

Exclusive breastfeeding by child’s age ……………………………………… 77<br />

Breastfeeding by district ………………………………………………..…… 78<br />

Vaccination of children …………………………………………………..… 80<br />

Childhood vaccination received by 12 months of age ……………………… 84<br />

Source of childhood vaccination ………….…………………………..…… 86<br />

Vitamin A and IFA supplementation for children ………………………..… 87<br />

Childhood vaccination by district ………………………………………..… 89<br />

Awareness of diarrhoea …………………………………………………..… 90<br />

Treatment of diarrhoea …………………………………………………..… 91<br />

Awareness of pneumonia ………………………………………………..…… 93<br />

Treatment of pneumonia ………………………………………………..…… 94<br />

Knowledge of diarrhoea management and pneumonia by district ……..…… 95<br />

Knowledge of contraceptive methods …………………………………..…… 98<br />

Knowledge of contraceptive methods by districts ……………………..…… 99<br />

No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV)……………………………………………..… 100<br />

No-scalpel vasectomy by district ………………………………………..…… 101<br />

Contraceptive prevalence rate …………………………………………..…… 102<br />

Contraceptive prevalence rates by district………………………………..… 1<strong>04</strong><br />

Use of contraception by women ………………………………………..…… 105<br />

Use of contraception by men ……………………………………………..… 106<br />

Reasons for not using male methods ……………………………………..… 107<br />

Source of modern contraceptive methods ………………………………..… 108<br />

<strong>Health</strong> problems with current use of contraception……………………..…… 109<br />

Follow-up visit and sought treatment for health problems with current use<br />

of contraception …………………………………………………………… 110<br />

Advice on contraceptive use………………………………………..………. 111<br />

Future intention to use …………………………………………………..…… 111<br />

Future use of contraception by number of living children ……………..…… 113<br />

Reasons for discontinuation of contraception …………………………..…… 113<br />

Reason for not using contraceptive method ………….………………..…… 114<br />

Unmet need for family planning services ………………………………..… 115<br />

Unmet need by district …………………………………………………..…… 116<br />

Home visit by health worker ……………………………………………..… 120<br />

Home visit by health worker by district ………………………………..…… 122<br />

Matter discussed during contact with a health worker ….………………..… 123<br />

Visit to health facility …………………………………………………..…… 125<br />

Visit to health facility by district ………………………………………..…… 126<br />

Quality of government health facility …………………………………..…… 127<br />

Reason for not preferring government health facility …………………..…… 127<br />

Advise to adopt family planning method ………………………………..…… 128<br />

Availability of regular supply of condoms/pills …….……………………… 128<br />

Information of other modern method before sterilization ………………..… 129<br />

v


Table 7.11<br />

Table 7.12<br />

Table 7.13<br />

Table 7.14<br />

Table 8.1<br />

Table 8.2<br />

Table 8.3<br />

Table 8.4<br />

Table 8.5<br />

Table 8.6<br />

Table 8.7<br />

Table 8.8<br />

Table 8.9<br />

Table 8.10<br />

Table 8.11<br />

Table 8.12<br />

Table 8.13<br />

Table 8.14<br />

Table 8.15<br />

Table 8.16<br />

Table 8.17<br />

Table 8.18<br />

Table 8.19<br />

Page<br />

Information on side effect and follow-up for current method …………..…… 129<br />

Quality of care indicators for contraceptive users by district ……………… 130<br />

Advised to have delivery at health facility and follow-up services for post<br />

partum check-up ………………….………..…………………………..…… 131<br />

Quality of care indicators for maternal care …………….………………..… 132<br />

Source of knowledge about RTI/STI among women ……………………… 134<br />

Source of knowledge about RTI/STI among men ………………………..… 135<br />

Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of RTI/STI among<br />

women ……………………………………………………………..………. 137<br />

Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of RTI/STI among men … 138<br />

Symptoms of RTI/STI among women …………………………………..…… 139<br />

Symptoms of RTI/STI among men ……………………………………..…… 141<br />

Abnormal vaginal discharge …………………………………………..…… 142<br />

Menstruation related problems …………………………………………..… 143<br />

Reproductive health care indicators by district …………………………..… 144<br />

Source of knowledge about HIV/AIDS among women ………………..…… 146<br />

Source of knowledge about HIV/AIDS among men ……………………..…<br />

Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS among<br />

women ……………………………………………………………..……….<br />

Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS among<br />

men ……………………………………………………………..…………..<br />

Knowledge about avoidance of HIV/AIDS among women ……………..…<br />

Knowledge about avoidance of HIV/AIDS among men ………………..……<br />

151<br />

152<br />

153<br />

Misconception about transmission of HIV/AIDS among women …………… 154<br />

Misconception about transmission of HIV/AIDS among men …………..… 155<br />

Knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS ……………………………..…… 156<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by district ……………………..…… 157<br />

148<br />

150<br />

vi


Figure 2.1<br />

Figure 2.2<br />

Figure 3.1<br />

Figure 3.2<br />

Figure 3.3<br />

Figure 4.1<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

Figure 4.3<br />

Figure 4.4<br />

Figure 4.5<br />

Figure 4.6<br />

Figure 4.7<br />

Figure 5.1<br />

Figure 5.2<br />

Figure 5.3<br />

Figure 5.4<br />

Figure 6.1<br />

Figure 6.2<br />

Figure 6.3<br />

Figure 7.1<br />

Figure 8.1<br />

Figure 8.2<br />

Figure 8.3<br />

Figure 8.4<br />

FIGURES<br />

Page<br />

Age-sex-pyramid ………………………………………………………..…… 11<br />

Percentage literate by age and sex ………….…………………………..…… 15<br />

Birth order 3 & above by selected background characteristic …………..…… 42<br />

Birth order 3 & above by district …………………………………..………. 42<br />

Fertility preference……………………………………………………..……… 43<br />

Source of antenatal care ………………………………………………..……… 47<br />

Full antenatal care by background characteristic ………………………..…… 56<br />

Percentage of women with pregnancy complication and by symptoms ……… 59<br />

Place of delivery and assistance during delivery ………………………..…… 61<br />

Delivery assisted by skilled person by background characteristic …………… 65<br />

Percentage of women with delivery complication and by symptoms ………… 68<br />

Percentage of women with post delivery complication and by symptoms.…… 70<br />

Initiation of breastfeeding ………………………………………………..…… 76<br />

Percentage of children age 12-23 months who have received specific<br />

vaccination ……………………………………………………………..……… 81<br />

Percentage of children age 12-23 months who have received all vaccination 83<br />

Child vaccination by age ………………………………………………..…… 85<br />

Knowledge of family planning method …………………………………..…… 98<br />

Practise of family planning methods ……………………………………..…… 103<br />

Source of family planning among current users of modern contraceptive<br />

methods ……………………………………………………………..………. 108<br />

Distribution of districts by home visit by health worker ………………..…… 121<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI by sex according to residence …………………..…… 136<br />

Symptoms of RTI/STI among women …………………………………..…… 140<br />

Symptoms of RTI/STI among husbands………………………………..……… 140<br />

Awareness of HIV/AIDS by sex according to residence ………………..…… 147<br />

Map 1<br />

Map 2<br />

Map 3<br />

Map 4<br />

Map 5<br />

Map 6<br />

MAPS<br />

Percent Girl Marrying Below Legal Age at Marriage………………………….<br />

Percentage of <strong>Household</strong>s using Salt that Contains 15 ppm <strong>Level</strong> of Iodine….<br />

Percentage of Women Received Three or More Ante Natal Check Up ………<br />

Percentage of Delivery Attended by Skilled Person………………………….<br />

Percentage of Children (age 12-23 months) Who Have Received Full<br />

Vaccination…………………………………………………………………….<br />

Current Use of Any Family Planning Method…………………………….……<br />

Page<br />

30<br />

31<br />

73<br />

74<br />

96<br />

117<br />

vii


PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Government of India had launched the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) program to ensure<br />

that couples have access to adequate information and services for reproductive health care. As a<br />

first step, family planning target has been withdrawn and an effort is being made to provide a<br />

package of reproductive services at different levels of health care centres.<br />

Monitoring of the services is also being improved. New indicators are being added to assess<br />

quality of services and provision of an integrated reproductive health care service. The <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) was initiated by Government of India and financed by the<br />

World Bank covering all the districts in the country. For the second time, district level estimates<br />

will be available for most of the critical reproductive health indicators. These important initiatives<br />

are certainly quite satisfying for all those who are concerned with taking ICPD reproductive<br />

health agenda ahead. The project is being coordinated by International Institute for Population<br />

Sciences, Mumbai and implemented by a number of consulting agencies.<br />

For the purpose of data collection, uniform questionnaires, sampling design and field procedures<br />

were used throughout the country. The survey thus provided comparable data for all the districts<br />

in the state. The present report provides salient findings of Himachal Pradesh and covered all the<br />

districts. The findings of selected indicators of reproductive and child health services from the<br />

state of Himachal Pradesh are presented in the report.<br />

It is believe that the data generated through the survey will meet requirements of the Programme<br />

Administrators and Policy Makers for making effective interventions for providing quality<br />

services and achieving multiple objectives.<br />

The DLHS-RCH could not have been successfully completed without cooperation and support<br />

from innumerable sources at various stages of the project. Although, it is not possible to<br />

acknowledge everyone involved in the survey, several organizations and individuals deserve<br />

special mention.<br />

We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge Shri P.K. Hota, Secretary, Ministry of<br />

<strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India. Our special thanks are due to Shri<br />

Y.N. Chaturvedi, Shri A.R. Nanda and Shri J.V.R. Prasada Rao, former Secretaries, Department<br />

of Family Welfare, GoI, who have gave us an opportunity to participate as consulting<br />

organisation in the survey of the national importance. Our special thanks are due to Shri S.K.<br />

Sinha, Additional Director General, Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, GoI. Thanks are due<br />

to Shri K.V. Rao, Shri S.K. Das and Shri D.K. Joshi, former Chief Directors for their help. We<br />

are also thankful to Shri Partha Chattopadhyaya, Chief Director and Mr. K.D. Maiti, Director,<br />

Mrs Rashmi Verma, and Mr. Rezimohn, Assistant Director, Statistics division of MoHFW for all<br />

the support extended by them. Our special thanks are due to Dr. T.K. Roy, former Director and<br />

Senior Professor, IIPS, Mumbai, for his timely advice and valuable guidance. Thanks are due to<br />

Dr. G. Rama Rao, Officiating Director, IIPS, Mumbai. We also acknowledge the contribution of<br />

Dr. F. Ram, Dr. B. Paswan, Dr. L. Ladu Singh coordinators of the project at IIPS, Mumbai. It<br />

also gives us immense pleasure to thank Dr. G. N.V. Ramana, Public <strong>Health</strong> Specialist, World Bank,<br />

New Delhi for the able guidance and technical support to the project. We would also like to<br />

thank the NSSO, New Delhi for their help in providing UFS Block for DLHS-2.


We are thankful to Shri Lokesh Jha, Commissioner, <strong>Health</strong> & Family Welfare, Government of Jammu<br />

& Kashmir, Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family welfare for his encouragement and support for the<br />

survey work. We further acknowledge Dr. Jasbeer Singh, Director of Family Welfare, Government of<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family Welfare for his encouragement and logistic<br />

support. Thanks are due to Dr. Saleen Rehman, Assistant Director, Government of Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family welfare for his cooperation and support. Thanks are also due to<br />

officials of the Census Department at the center and the state and Officials of the NSSO and<br />

other <strong>District</strong>s authorities for all the support rendered, which facilitated us in the smooth and<br />

timely completion of the data collection.<br />

Thanks are due to UNICEF for funding the health component of the survey. We are especially<br />

thankful to Dr. C. Chandrasekhar and Dr. V. Jayachandran, for their keen interest and timely supply<br />

of necessary inputs for the successful completion of the health component of the survey. Our<br />

thanks are also due to Dr. Prema Ramachandran, Advisor, Planning Commission for her keen<br />

interest in the survey. Thanks are also due to Dr.G.N.V. Brahmam, Deputy Director, <strong>National</strong><br />

Institute of Nutrition, Hydrabad and his team members who had flown to Srinagar to train the<br />

state Laboratory Technicians in handling of thousands of blood samples for the successful<br />

completion of health component of the survey.<br />

Thanks are due to our field and supervisory staff for timely completion of the fieldwork, in-spite<br />

of difficult terrain and other field hazards. Their hard work will be truly rewarded only when results<br />

of the survey meet requirements of the user agencies, especially the Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> & Family<br />

Welfare, New Delhi. Thanks are also due to Shri Brij Kishore Yadav for his hard work in timely<br />

completion of data processing and computational work. We would be failing in our duty if we do<br />

not thank our respondents who spent their valuable time with tremendous patience.<br />

New Delhi<br />

June, 2006<br />

O.P.VIG<br />

Project Director<br />

Society for Applied Research In Humanities,<br />

x


KEY INDICATORS, Jammu & Kashmir<br />

DISTRICT LEVEL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY- REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH, (DLHS-RCH), <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Sample size<br />

<strong>Household</strong>s surveyed…………………………………<br />

Currently married women age 15-44………………..<br />

Husband’s of eligible women…………………………<br />

Characteristics of households<br />

Percent rural……………………………………………<br />

Percent Hindu………………………………………….<br />

Percent Muslim………………………………………...<br />

Percent other religion (Sikh)……….................……..<br />

Percent scheduled caste……………………………...<br />

Percent scheduled tribe……………………………….<br />

Percent with electricity………………………………...<br />

Percent with flush toilet……………………………….<br />

Percent with no toilet facility………………………….<br />

Percent living in Kachcha houses……………………<br />

Percent living in Pucca houses……………………...<br />

Percent with low standard of living…………………..<br />

Percent with high standard of living………………….<br />

Percent with iodized salt (15+ppm)………………….<br />

Characteristics of currently married<br />

women age 15-44 years<br />

Percent below age 30 ………………………………..<br />

Percent with age at first cohabitation below age 18.<br />

Percent illiterate………………………………………..<br />

Percent having 10 or more years of schooling……..<br />

Percent with illiterate husband……………………….<br />

Percent with husband 10+ years of schooling……...<br />

Marriage<br />

Mean age at marriage for boys………………………<br />

Mean age marriage for girls…………………………..<br />

Percent of boys married below age 21……………...<br />

Percent of girls married below age 18………………<br />

Fertility<br />

Mean children ever born women age 40-44 years…<br />

Percent of births of order 3 and above 1 ……………..<br />

Current use of family planning method<br />

Any method…………………………………………….<br />

Any modern method…………………………………..<br />

Pill………………………………………………………<br />

IUD……………………………………………………..<br />

Condom………………………………………………..<br />

Female sterilization…………………………………..<br />

Male sterilization……………………………………...<br />

Any traditional method………………………………...<br />

Rhythm/safe period…………………………………..<br />

Withdrawal……………………………………………...<br />

Unmet need for family planning<br />

Percent with unmet need for spacing………………..<br />

Percent with unmet need for limiting………………...<br />

Percent with total unmet need………………………..<br />

Maternal care 2<br />

Percent of women received antenatal check-ups<br />

Antenatal check-up at home………………………….<br />

Antenatal check-up in first trimester…………………<br />

Three or more visit for ANC…………………………..<br />

Two or more tetanus toxoid injections………………<br />

15,087<br />

10,308<br />

10,239<br />

75.0<br />

32.3<br />

63.6<br />

2.4<br />

10.3<br />

12.0<br />

80.4<br />

29.7<br />

21.1<br />

16.0<br />

33.2<br />

20.6<br />

27.7<br />

45.0<br />

32.4<br />

15.3<br />

60.2<br />

22.1<br />

34.1<br />

36.2<br />

25.9<br />

22.8<br />

3.9<br />

5.0<br />

3.4<br />

32.1<br />

54.8<br />

51.9<br />

4.5<br />

2.4<br />

18.1<br />

25.3<br />

1.7<br />

2.8<br />

0.7<br />

2.1<br />

14.1<br />

10.7<br />

24.8<br />

87.6<br />

0.0<br />

63.2<br />

80.2<br />

73.6<br />

Adequate Iron folic acid tablets/syrup 3 …………………<br />

Full antenatal check-up 4 …………………………………<br />

Delivery characteristics 2<br />

Delivery at home………………………………………….<br />

Delivery at government health institutions……………..<br />

Delivery at private health institutions…………………...<br />

Delivery attendant by skilled persons 5 …………………<br />

Child health<br />

Percent of children whose mother squeezed out milk<br />

from her breast 6 …………………………………………..<br />

Percent of children 7 with diarrhoea 8 who received<br />

ORS………………………………………………………..<br />

Percent of children 7 with pneumonia 8 who were taken<br />

to a health facility or provider……………………………<br />

Percent of children who received<br />

vaccinations 9<br />

BCG………………………………………………………...<br />

DPT (3 injections)…………………………………………<br />

Polio (3 drops)…………………………………………….<br />

Measles…………………………………………………….<br />

All vaccinations 10 ….………………………………………<br />

No vaccination at all. …………………………………….<br />

Percentage of women who had<br />

Pregnancy complication 2 …………………………………<br />

Delivery complication 2 ……………………………………<br />

Post delivery complication 2 ………………………………<br />

Symptoms of RTI/STI…………………………………….<br />

Problems of vaginal discharge………………………….<br />

Menstruation related problem…………………………...<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS<br />

Percent of women who have heard of RTI/STI………..<br />

Percent of women who have heard of HIV/AIDS……...<br />

Utilization of government health services<br />

Antenatal care……………………………………….<br />

Treatment for pregnancy complication…………………<br />

Treatment for post-delivery complication………………<br />

Treatment for vaginal discharge………………………...<br />

Treatment for children with diarrhoea…………………..<br />

Treatment for children with pneumonia………………...<br />

Quality of family planning services<br />

Percent non-users ever advised to adopt the family<br />

planning method…………………………………………..<br />

Percent users told about side effects of method…..….<br />

Percent users who received follow-up services……….<br />

Characteristics of husband of eligible<br />

women<br />

Percent of husband knowing NSV………………………<br />

Percent of men who have heard of RTI/STI…………...<br />

Percent of men who have heard of HIV/AIDS….……..<br />

Percentage who had any symptoms of RTI/STI………<br />

Sought treatment for RTI/STI …………………………..<br />

53.7<br />

44.4<br />

28.4<br />

55.9<br />

14.6<br />

73.1<br />

72.5<br />

69.5<br />

95.2<br />

91.5<br />

40.2<br />

41.7<br />

77.9<br />

32.0<br />

2.6<br />

40.1<br />

64.6<br />

47.3<br />

16.0<br />

0.9<br />

3.8<br />

15.3<br />

53.8<br />

66.9<br />

87.5<br />

86.1<br />

73.2<br />

80.0<br />

93.1<br />

5.9<br />

43.4<br />

10.7<br />

12.2<br />

27.2<br />

53.8<br />

6.2<br />

54.0<br />

1<br />

For births in past three years, 2 For live/still births during three years preceding the survey, 3 100 or more IFA tablets/Syrup, 4 A<br />

minimum of three visits for ANC, at least one TT injections and 100 or more IFA tablets/syrup, 5 Either institutional delivery or home<br />

delivery assisted by Doctor/ANM/nurse, 6 Children age below 3 years, 7 Last but one living children below age 3 years, 8 Last two<br />

weeks preceding the survey, 9 Last but one living children (age 12-23 months) born during three years preceding the survey. 10 BCG,<br />

three injections of DPT, three drops of polio and measles.


SALIENT FINDINGS<br />

For the assessment of district level Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> indicators, Government of<br />

India proposed to undertake district level household surveys through non-governmental agencies<br />

on an annual basis. The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) was the result of government’s<br />

initiative. In Jammu & Kashmir State, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, India was<br />

entrusted to carry out the survey work. The survey for Phase-1 of the DLHS covering seven<br />

districts of the state was conducted during April <strong>2002</strong> to December <strong>2002</strong>. The survey for Phase-2<br />

covering the remaining seven districts of the state was carried out during July 20<strong>04</strong> to December<br />

20<strong>04</strong>. The focus of the survey was on: i) Coverage of ante natal care (ANC) and immunization<br />

services, ii) Extent of safe deliveries, iii) Contraceptive prevalence rate and unmet need for family<br />

planning, iv) Awareness about RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS and v) Utilization of government health<br />

services and users’ satisfaction. The salient findings of the survey are presented here.<br />

For both the phases together, the data was collected from 15,087 households in Jammu &<br />

Kashmir State. From these households, 10,308 eligible women (usual resident or visitors who<br />

stayed in the sample household the night before the interview, currently married aged 15-44<br />

years whose marriage was consummated) and 10,239 husbands of eligible women were interviewed.<br />

Of the total households interviewed in Jammu & Kashmir State, one-fourth of the<br />

households were from urban areas. The sample households constituted of 32 percent Hindu, 64<br />

percent Muslim, over two percent Sikh and over one percent from other category. Twenty-two<br />

percent of the households belonged to either scheduled castes or scheduled tribes and 18 percent<br />

belonged to other backward class. Sixteen percent of the households lived in Kachcha houses, 51<br />

percent in semi-pacca houses and 33 percent in pucca houses. Twenty-one percent of the households<br />

were with low SLI, 52 percent with medium SLI and 28 percent with high SLI.<br />

Thirty-seven percent of the population aged seven and above was non-literate. Further, 47<br />

percent of females as against 28 percent of males were non-literate. Proportion of non-literate is<br />

much higher among the older cohort compared to the younger ones. Sixty percent of the eligible<br />

women were non-literate and 22 percent women have completed 10 or more years of schooling in the<br />

state. The level of literacy among eligible women was 40 percent as against 55 percent among their<br />

husbands in the Jammu & Kashmir State. The distribution of non-literate women shows that lesser<br />

proportion of younger women below 30 years was illiterate compared to older women 30 years<br />

and above. The scenario in respect of non-literate husbands is similar.<br />

The reporting of the marriages during three yeas prior to survey gives the mean age at<br />

marriage of boys and girls in the state as 25.9 and 22.8 years respectively. Four percent of boys and<br />

five percent of girls in the state got married before attaining the minimum legal age at marriage<br />

of 21 and 18 years respectively. The percentage of boys who got married below the legal minimum<br />

age at marriage was 10 percent or more in Badgan, Doda and Rajouri districts. Similarly, percentage<br />

of girls marrying below the legal minimum age at marriage of 18 years was 10 percent or more<br />

in Badgam, Doda and Kargil district of the state.<br />

Only 45 percent of the households were using cooking salt that was iodized at the<br />

recommended level of 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content whereas six percent of households<br />

used salts that were not iodized at all, while 48 percent households were using salt with iodine


content of 7 ppm. The proportion of households using non-iodized salt was the highest (21 percent)<br />

in Kupwara district, followed by 20 percent in Pulwama district and lowest (zero percent) in Doda,<br />

Leh, Poonch, Rajouri, Srinagar and Udhampur districts. The percentage of households using salt<br />

with 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content was the highest (99 percent) in Leh district, followed<br />

by 84 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. While 48<br />

percent or more (state average) of the households in Anantnag, Doda, Kathua, Poonch, Rajouri,<br />

Srinagar and Udhampur districts were consuming adequately iodized salt.<br />

The mean number of children ever born to a woman was 2.5 children in the state – 2.5<br />

children in rural areas and 2.3 children in urban areas. Further, mean number of children ever<br />

born to women aged 40-44 years was 3.4 children, which is close to the completed family size of<br />

the women. The completed fertility in the state varies from the lowest of 2.7 children in Doda<br />

and Leh districts to the highest of 4.4 children in Baramula district.<br />

The share of births of order 3 and above in the total births that occurred three years prior<br />

to survey was 32 percent. In most of the district, proportion of higher order births is quite high,<br />

ranging from the lowest of seven percent in Poonch district to the highest of 56 percent in<br />

Baramula district.<br />

The data collected on the utilization of ANC services for the women who had their last<br />

live/ still birth during three years prior to survey shows that the ANC coverage in the state was<br />

quite high as 88 percent of the women received at least one ante-natal care during pregnancy.<br />

Two-third of the women visited government health facility as against 16 percent women who<br />

visited private health facility for ANC. The percent of women who got some kind of ANC during<br />

pregnancy range between 56 percent in Doda district to 98 percent in Baramula district. In five<br />

out of 14 districts 90 percent or more women got ANC.<br />

Though 88 percent of the women in Jammu & Kashmir State received ANC, only 59, 89<br />

and 75 percent of the women had check-up of weight, blood pressure and abdomen respectively.<br />

Seventy-seven percent women received Iron and Folic Acid (IFA) tablets and 81 percent got at<br />

least one TT injection. A full package of ANC including minimum three ANC visits, at least one<br />

TT injection and 100 or more IFA tablets/Syrup was received by over 44 percent women.<br />

Minimum three ANC and timing of first check up are crucial for maternal and childcare.<br />

Eighty percent of the women in Jammu & Kashmir State made three or more ANC visit, while<br />

63 percent of the women visited health facility for the first antenatal check-up in the first trimester<br />

of pregnancy. The extent of women who had ANC in first trimester varies from minimum of 24<br />

percent in Poonch district to the maximum of 93 percent in Baramula district. Similarly, extent<br />

of women who received three or more ANC varies from minimum of 33 percent in Poonch district<br />

to the maximum of 98 percent in Baramula district.<br />

Over 70 percent of the total deliveries in Jammu & Kashmir State were conducted in health<br />

institutions; 26 percentages point up from RCH Round-I. Fifty-six percent institutional deliveries<br />

were conducted in government institutions as against 15 percent in private institution. Only nine<br />

percent of the total deliveries, that took place at home, were assisted by midwifery trained persons<br />

i.e. doctor and ANM/Nurse/LHV and 40 percent by TBA. Thus, 49 percent of the deliveries, 22<br />

percent points up from RCH Round-I, were assisted by skilled personnel in the state. The extent<br />

of institutional deliveries varies from the lowest of 23 percent in Poonch districts to the highest<br />

xiv


of 95 percent in Kargil district. Safe deliveries vary from the lowest of 30 percent in Kathua district<br />

to the highest of 95 percent in Kargil district. The extent of the institutional deliveries was the<br />

highest (74 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (64 percent)<br />

for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percent of institutional deliveries was the<br />

highest (77 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (51 percent) for women with low<br />

SLI. The variation in the institutional deliveries by women’s economic status is much conspicuous<br />

than that by women’s education.<br />

In Jammu & Kashmir State, 40, 65 and 47 percent of the women experienced pregnancy,<br />

delivery and post delivery complications respectively. Eighty-one percent of the women sought<br />

treatment for the pregnancy and 83 percent for the post-delivery complications. The pregnancy<br />

complication varies from the lowest of four percent in Kathua district to the highest of 58 percent<br />

in Kargil district. The incidence of all the three types of complications seems to be linked with each<br />

other. In the districts where the incidence of pregnancy complications is high, the incidence of<br />

delivery and post-delivery complications is also high.<br />

In most of the districts and the state as a whole, the practice of breast-feeding is quite high.<br />

However, only 59 percent of the women breastfed the child within two hours of birth, while 87<br />

percent women breastfed the child within one day of birth. More than one-tenth of the women started<br />

breastfeeding the child after one day of birth. There is great deal of variation in the pattern of breastfeeding<br />

across the districts. The extent of women initiating breastfeeding within two hours of birth<br />

was the highest (97 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts and the lowest (10 percent) in<br />

Kathua district.<br />

In Jammu & Kashmir State, 91, 40, 42 and 78 percent of the children received the BCG<br />

vaccine, three doses of DPT and Polio vaccine, and measles vaccine respectively. There is 13<br />

percentage points drop from BCG to measles. It means that large numbers of children who have<br />

contact with service providers are missed out of subsequent services. The complete schedule of<br />

immunization including BCG, three doses of DPT and Polio each and measles was received by<br />

32 percent of the children, whereas three percent of the children did not at all receive any vaccination<br />

under routine programme. Thirty-nine percent of the children received supplementation of at-least<br />

one dose of vitamin-A and only 12 percent children received IFA tablets/liquid for iron supplementation.<br />

The extent of complete immunization consisting of BCG, three injections of DPT, three<br />

doses of Polio and measles was the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district and the highest (50<br />

percent) in Baramula district. The percentage of children who received complete immunization<br />

was higher than that of the state (39 percent) in Baramula and Jammu districts and in the remaining<br />

12 districts it was below the state level. In Jammu & Kashmir State, 70 percent of the women<br />

were aware of diarrhoea management and 60 percent were aware of Oral Rehydration Salt (ORS).<br />

During the two-week period prior to survey, children of eight percent of the women suffered from<br />

diarrhoea, while over 69 percent of the women treated diarrhoea among children by giving ORS.<br />

In comparison to awareness about diarrhoea management, the awareness about danger sings of<br />

pneumonia is quite low. Only 31 percent of the women reported awareness about danger sings of<br />

pneumonia. One-fifth of the women reported that their children suffered from cough, cold and<br />

difficulty in breathing in two-week period prior to survey and 95 percent sought treatment.<br />

The knowledge of family planning methods is universal in all districts of Jammu & Kashmir<br />

xv


State, with 97 percent of the women reporting knowledge of one method or the other. However,<br />

the knowledge of any spacing method was marginally low, but the proportion per se was quite<br />

high (82 percent). The knowledge of any modern methods was also universal in all the districts,<br />

though the knowledge of all modern methods was only 32 percent. The proportion knowing all<br />

modern methods (males and females’ sterilization, IUD, oral pills and condom) varies from less<br />

than one percent in Badgam district to 73 percent in Pulwama district.<br />

In DLHS, knowledge about No-scalpel vasectomy has been asked to husbands of eligible<br />

women. Only 12 percent of the husbands were aware of no-scalpel vasectomy in the state. The<br />

proportion of husbands knowing No-scalpel vasectomy varies from less than one percent in<br />

Baramula, Doda and Rajouri districts to 37 percent in Leh district.<br />

The contraceptive prevalence rate (any methods) in the state was 55 percent, seven<br />

percent point up from RCH Round-I, comprising of prevalence of 52 percent of modern methods<br />

and three percent of traditional methods. Twenty-seven percent of the couples adopted sterilization.<br />

The percentage of user of the male methods of sterilization and condom was only 20 percent.<br />

There appears to be negative association between contraceptive use and female education. The<br />

contraceptive prevalence rate was the highest (91 percent) in Leh district, followed by 87 percent<br />

in Kargil district and the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district.<br />

In Jammu & Kashmir State, one-fourth of the women were found to have unmet need for<br />

family planning, with about 11 percent for limiting and over 14 percent for spacing. The total unmet<br />

need varies from the highest (66 percent) in Doda district, followed by 59 percent in Baramula<br />

district and the lowest (three percent) in Leh district.<br />

Only three percent of the women in the state reported that either ANM/LHV or health<br />

worker visited them at their residence at least once in the past three months. Fifty-four percent of<br />

the women were home visited by ANM/LHV as against 37 percent by Male health worker, while<br />

the doctor visited 13 percent of the women. Further, three-fourth (76 percent) of the women were<br />

satisfied with the amount of time spent with them by the health workers, while 90 percent of the<br />

women were satisfied services/advise given to them.<br />

Five percent or more women reported home visit in Jammu, Srinagar and Udhampur districts,<br />

while in the remaining 11 districts of Ananatnag, Badgam, Baramula, Doda, Kargil, Kathua,<br />

Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch and Rajouri districts it was below the state average of three percent.<br />

The percentage of the eligible women who needed to visit health facility during three months<br />

prior to survey and visited any health facility was 10 percent as against 37 percent women who<br />

needed to visit health facility and not visited it. Fifty-four percent women visited government<br />

health facility and 42 percent women visited private health facility, while the remaining visited<br />

ISM and other health facility. Main reasons given by the women for not visiting the government<br />

health facility were ‘not-conveniently located’ or ‘time is not suited’ or ‘poor quality of services’<br />

or ‘heavy rush’ or ‘non/rare availability of doctors/health worker’ or ‘doctors/health workers do<br />

not examine properly’ or ‘medicine not/rarely given or of bad quality’ or ‘doctors/paramedical<br />

staff does not behave properly’.<br />

The district level variation in the utilization of the government health facilities ranges from<br />

xvi


22 percent in Anantnag district to 100 percent in Leh district. The percentage of women who<br />

visited private health facility ranges from zero percent in Leh district to 76 percent in Anantnag<br />

district.<br />

In Jammu & Kashmir State 15 and 54 percent of the women were aware of RTI/STI and<br />

HIV/AIDS respectively. The level of awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS among husbands of<br />

eligible women was 27 and 68 percent respectively. The percent of women who were aware of<br />

RTI/STI was the highest (90 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 46 percent in Leh district<br />

and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. Similarly, percent of women who were aware of<br />

HIV/AIDS was the highest (92 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 91 percent in Leh<br />

district and the lowest (11 percent) in Rajauri district.<br />

Awareness level of husbands of eligible women of RTI/STI was the highest (91 percent)<br />

in Baramula district, followed by 52 percent in Leh district and the lowest (over one percent) in<br />

Kathua district. Similarly, awareness level of husbands of eligible women of HIV/AIDS was the<br />

highest (99 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 97 percent in Baramula district<br />

and the lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district. Out of 14 districts, in 9 districts the<br />

awareness of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (68 percent) for men and in five<br />

districts it was higher than that of the state (54 percent) for women.<br />

Sixteen percent of women and six percent of husbands of eligible women in the state<br />

reported having at least one symptoms of RTI/STI. In most of the districts the reported prevalence of<br />

RTI/STI among husbands was quite low. The prevalence of RTI/STI among women was the highest<br />

(27 percent) in Kargil and Udhampur districts, followed by 26 percent in Jammu district and the<br />

lowest (two percent) in Baramula and Doda districts. Similarly, prevalence of RTI/STI among<br />

husbands of eligible women was the highest (14 percent) in Udhampur district, followed by 13<br />

percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero percent) in Baramula district.<br />

Only one percent of the women reported vaginal discharge in the state - lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kupwara, Pulwama, Poonch and Srinagar districts and highest<br />

(eight percent) in Leh district. Sixty-two percent of the women sought treatment for vaginal<br />

discharge problem and 54 percent of the husbands with at least one symptoms of RTI/STI sought<br />

treatment. The percentage of women who sought treatment of vaginal discharge was higher than<br />

that of the state (62 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil, Kathua, Rajouri and Udhampur districts and it was<br />

lower than that of the state in Doda, Jammu and Leh districts, while in the remaining six districts<br />

no cases of abnormal vaginal discharge were reported.<br />

xvii


CHAPTER I<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 Background and Objectives of the <strong>Survey</strong><br />

The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme that has been launched by Government of<br />

India (GoI) in 1996-97 is expected to provide quality services and achieve multiple objectives. It<br />

ushered a positive paradigm shift from method-oriented, target-based activity to providing clientcentred,<br />

demand-driven quality services. Also, efforts are being made to reorient provider’s<br />

attitude at grassroots level and to strengthen the services at outreach levels.<br />

The new approach requires decentralization of planning, monitoring and evaluation of the<br />

services. The district being the basic nucleus of planning and implementation of the RCH programme,<br />

Government of India has been interested in generating district level data on utilization of the<br />

services provided by government health facilities, other than that based on service statistics. It is<br />

also of interest to assess people’s perceptions on quality of services. Therefore, it was decided to<br />

undertake <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) under the RCH programme in the country.<br />

The Round-I of RCH survey was conducted during the year 1998–99 in two phases (each<br />

phase covered half of the districts from all states/union territories) in 5<strong>04</strong> districts for which<br />

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai was designated as the nodal agency.<br />

In Round-II, survey was completed during <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong> in 593 districts as per the 2001<br />

Census. In DLHS-RCH, information about RCH has been collected using a slightly modified<br />

questionnaire. In Round II, some new dimensions, such as test of cooking salt to assess the<br />

consumption of salt fortified with iodine, collection of blood of children, adolescents and pregnant<br />

women to assess the level of anaemia, and measurement of weight of children to assess the nutritional<br />

status, were incorporated.<br />

The main focus of the DLHS-RCH has been on the following aspects:<br />

‣ Coverage of ANC & immunization services<br />

‣ Proportion of safe deliveries<br />

‣ Contraceptive prevalence rates<br />

‣ Unmet need for family planning<br />

‣ Awareness about RTI/ STI and HIV/AIDS<br />

‣ Utilization of government health services and users’ satisfaction.<br />

For the purpose of conducting DLHS-RCH, all the states and the union territories were<br />

grouped into 16 regions. A total of twelve research organizations including Population Research Centres<br />

(PRCs) were involved in conducting the survey in 16 regions with IIPS as the nodal agency.<br />

1.2 <strong>Survey</strong> Design<br />

In Round-II, a systematic, multi-stage stratified sampling design was adopted. In each district, 40


Primary Sampling Units (PSUs – Villages/Urban Frame Size) were selected with probability<br />

proportional to size (PPS) using the 1991 Census data. All the villages were stratified according<br />

to population size, and female literacy was used for implicit arrangement within each strata. The<br />

number of PSUs in rural and urban areas was decided on the basis of percent of urban population<br />

in the district. However, a minimum of 12 urban PSUs were selected in each district in case the percent<br />

urban was low. The target sample size in each district was set at 1,000 complete residential households<br />

from 40 selected PSUs. In the second stage, within each PSU, 28 residential households<br />

were selected with Circular Systematic Random Sampling (CSRS) procedure after house listing.<br />

In order to take care of non-response due to various reasons, sample was inflated by 10 percent<br />

(i.e. 1,100 households).<br />

For selecting the urban sample, the <strong>National</strong> Sample <strong>Survey</strong> Organization (NSSO)<br />

provided the list of selected urban frame size (UFS) blocks in the district. The UFS blocks were<br />

made available separately for each district for urban areas. The maps of selected blocks were<br />

obtained from the NSSO field office located in each state/union-territory.<br />

But in each state, in two districts, the PSUs that were surveyed in Round-I of DLHS-<br />

RCH (also known as RHS-RCH) were also selected for survey in Round-II. This was done in<br />

order to measure the changes more accurately. Two districts, one with the highest proportion of<br />

safe delivery and another with the lowest proportion of safe delivery among those surveyed<br />

during Round I of the survey were selected for this purpose. In all other districts, fresh sample of<br />

PSUs were selected.<br />

1.3 House Listing and Sample Selection<br />

The household listing operation was carried out in each of the selected PSU segment prior to the<br />

data collection that provided the necessary frame for selecting the households. The household listing<br />

operation also involved preparation of location map and layout sketch map of the structures and<br />

recording the details of the households in these structures in each selected PSU. This exercise was<br />

carried out by independent teams each comprising of one lister, one mapper and one supervisor under<br />

the overall guidance and monitoring of the survey coordinator of households of the selected regional<br />

agencies.<br />

A complete listing of households was carried out in villages with households up to 300. In<br />

case of villages with more than 300 households but less than or equal to 600 households, two<br />

segments of more or less same size were formed and one segment was selected at random and<br />

household listing was carried out. In case of villages with more than 600 households, segments each<br />

of about 150 households were formed and two segments were selected for listing using the<br />

systematic random sampling method.<br />

Small villages with less than 50 households were linked with a nearest village. After combining<br />

it with the nearest village, the same sampling procedure was adopted as mentioned above. For the<br />

urban PSUs, the selected UFS blocks needed no segmentation as they were of almost equal size<br />

and contained less than 300 households.<br />

No replacement was made if a selected household was absent during data collection.<br />

However, if a PSU was inaccessible, a replacement of PSU with similar characteristics was<br />

selected by the IIPS and provided to the regional agency for survey.<br />

2


1.4 Questionnaire<br />

DLHS-RCH collected information on various indicators pertaining to RCH that would assist<br />

policymakers and programme managers to formulate and implement the goals set for RCH<br />

programmes. The International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, the Nodal Agency<br />

for DLHS–RCH project has made necessary modifications in the two Questionnaires: <strong>Household</strong><br />

Questionnaire and Women’s Questionnaire and added three more Questionnaires i.e., Husband’s<br />

Questionnaire, Village Questionnaire and <strong>Health</strong> Questionnaire, in consultation with MoHFW<br />

and World Bank. These Questionnaires were discussed and finalized in training cum workshop organized<br />

at IIPS during the first week of November 2001.<br />

These modified questionnaires had been canvassed in round II of the DLHS–RCH survey,<br />

taking into consideration the views of all the regional agencies involved. The house–listing teams<br />

and the interviewers and the supervisors for the main survey were given rigorous training based<br />

on the manuals developed for the purpose by the Nodal Agency.<br />

All the questionnaires were bilingual, with questions in both regional and English language.<br />

The Details of questionnaires are as follows:<br />

<strong>Household</strong> Questionnaire: The household questionnaire lists all usual residents in each<br />

sample household including visitors who stayed in the household the night before the interview.<br />

For each listed household member, the survey collected basic information on age, sex, and<br />

marital status, relationship to the head of the household, education and the prevalence /incidence<br />

of tuberculosis, blindness and malaria. Information was also collected on the main source of<br />

drinking water, type of toilet facility, source of lighting, type of cooking fuel, religion and caste<br />

of household head and ownership of other durable goods in the household. In addition, a test<br />

was conducted to assess whether the household used cooking salt that has been fortified with<br />

iodine. Besides, details of marriages and deaths, which happen to usual residents within reference<br />

period, were collected. Efforts were also made to get information about maternal deaths.<br />

Women Questionnaire: Women questionnaire is designed to collect information from currently<br />

married women age 15 – 44 years who are usual residents of the sample household or visitors<br />

who stayed in the sample household the night before the interview. The women questionnaire covered<br />

the following sections:<br />

Section I: Background Characteristics: In this section the information collected on age,<br />

educational status and birth and death history of biological children including still birth, induced<br />

and spontaneous abortions.<br />

Section II: Antenatal, Natal and Post natal Care: In this section the questionnaire collect<br />

information only from the women who had live birth, still birth, spontaneous or induced abortion<br />

during last three years preceding the survey date. The information on whether women received<br />

antenatal and postpartum care, who attended the delivery and the nature of complications during<br />

pregnancy for recent births were also collected.<br />

Section III: Immunization and childcare: This section gives information about feeding<br />

3


practices, the length of breastfeeding, immunization coverage and recent occurrence of diarrhoea,<br />

and pneumonia for young children (below age 3 years).<br />

Section IV: Contraception: This section provides information on knowledge and use of<br />

specific family planning methods. Questions were included about reasons for non-use, intentions<br />

about future use, desire for additional child, sex preference for next child etc.<br />

Section V: Assessment of quality of Government health services and client satisfaction.<br />

In this section the questions are targeted to assess the quality of family planning and health services<br />

provided by Government health facilities. The information was also collected about the rating of<br />

Government health facilities and staffs and reasons for not visiting to government health facility<br />

by eligible woman.<br />

Section VI: Awareness about RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS: In this section the information<br />

were collected about women’s knowledge of RTI/STI about awareness, Source of knowledge,<br />

aware of mode of transmission, curability, symptoms and treatment seeking behaviour. About<br />

HIV/AIDS; Awareness, Source of knowledge, aware of mode of transmission and prevention etc<br />

were canvassed.<br />

Husband Questionnaire: In DLHS-RCH, round II, husband questionnaire was used to collect<br />

information from eligible women’s husbands about age, educational status, knowledge and<br />

source of knowledge of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS reported symptoms of RTI/STI and male<br />

participation. Apart from these information desires for children, reasons for not using F.P.<br />

methods, future intention to use F.P. methods and knowledge about no scalpel vasectomy (NSV)<br />

has also been collected.<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Questionnaire: In DLHS-RCH, round II, a health questionnaire is included. The information<br />

collected were on weight of children age 0–71 months old and the blood sample to assess the<br />

haemoglobin levels of children age 0–71 months old, adolescents 10–19 years old and pregnant<br />

eligible women. This information is useful for assessing the levels of nutrition prevailing in the<br />

population and prevalence of anaemia among women, adolescent girls and children.<br />

Village Questionnaire: A village questionnaire is also added in this round of DLHS. The information<br />

collected on the availability and accessibility of various facilities in the village especially on<br />

accessibility of educational and health facilities.<br />

1.5 Fieldwork and Sample Coverage<br />

The fieldwork for RCH Round-II was done in two phases. During Phase-I, seven 8districts were<br />

covered from April <strong>2002</strong> to December <strong>2002</strong> and remaining seven districts were covered during<br />

Phase-II from July 20<strong>04</strong> to December 20<strong>04</strong>. During Round-II, a total of 15,087 households were<br />

covered. From these surveyed households, 10,308 currently married women aged 15-44 years and<br />

10,239 husbands of eligible women were interviewed.<br />

1.6 Data processing<br />

All the five types of completed questionnaires were brought to the headquarter of regional agencies<br />

and data were processed using microcomputers. The process consisted of office editing of the<br />

4


questionnaires, data entry, data cleaning and tabulation. Data cleaning included validation, range<br />

and consistency checks. For both data entry and tabulation of the data, IIPS developed the software<br />

package. The district and state level reports were prepared by regional agency whereas national<br />

report is prepared by the nodal agency.<br />

1.7 Sample Weights<br />

In generating district level demographic indicator sample weight for household, women and<br />

husband, weight have been used and these for a particular district are based on three selection<br />

probabilities f 1 i , f 2<br />

i<br />

and f 3<br />

i<br />

pertaining to i th PSU of the district. These probabilities are defined as<br />

f i 1 = Probability of selection of i th PSU in a district<br />

(<br />

)<br />

=<br />

n H i<br />

H<br />

Where, nr<br />

is the number of rural PSU to be selected in a district, H i<br />

refers to the number of<br />

household in the i th PSU and H = ∑ Hi , total number of household in a district.<br />

r *<br />

f i 2<br />

= Probability of selecting segment (s) from segmented PSU<br />

(in case the i th selected PSU is segmented)<br />

= (Number of segments selected after segmentation of PSU) / (number of segment created a PSU)<br />

The value of f i 2 is to be equal to one for un-segmented PSU.<br />

f i 3<br />

= probability of selecting a household from the total listed households of a PSU or in<br />

segment(s) of a PSU<br />

=<br />

28* HR<br />

HL<br />

i<br />

i<br />

Where HR i is the household response rate of the i th sampled PSU and HL i is the number of<br />

households listed in i th PSU in a district.<br />

For urban PSU, f 1<br />

i<br />

is computed either as the ratio of number of urban PSUs to be included from<br />

the district to the total number of UFS blocks of the district or as the ratio of urban population of the<br />

selected PSU to the total urban population of the district.<br />

The probability of selecting a household from the district works out as;<br />

f i i i i<br />

= ( f * f f )<br />

1 2<br />

*<br />

3<br />

5


The non-normalized household weight for the i th<br />

normalized weight used in the generation of district indicators as<br />

PSU of the district is, w i<br />

=<br />

1 , while the<br />

f i<br />

n d i<br />

=<br />

∑ n i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

∑ n i * w<br />

i<br />

i<br />

* w<br />

, i= 1,2,3……………40.<br />

Where n i is the number of households interviewed in the i th PSU. The weight for women and<br />

husband are computed in the similar manner after multiplication of expression for f i by the<br />

corresponding response rate. State weights for households, women and husbands are further derived<br />

from the district weights ni d for the i th psu in d th district using external control so that for sample<br />

results do not deviate from the corresponding information about the population.<br />

Let, ns = ∑<br />

i<br />

d<br />

n i and N I = ∑<br />

i<br />

d<br />

N i , denote the number of households in the sample and census of<br />

a particular state, then state level households weights are work out as;<br />

n s i = n d i *<br />

⎛<br />

⎜n<br />

⎝<br />

⎛<br />

⎜ N i<br />

⎝<br />

d<br />

i<br />

d<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

ns<br />

⎠<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

N sc<br />

⎠<br />

, where n d i household sample in i th district, n s is the total sample in the<br />

state, N i d is the census population in the ith district and N sc is the census population in the state.<br />

These households’ weights are controlled for rural-urban separately.<br />

Considering sample and census currently married women in 15-44 years and married males<br />

above 15 years for specified state by districts and rural-urban residence, state level women and<br />

husbands’ weights are obtained for estimation of state level indicators.<br />

1.8 Sample Implementation<br />

Table 1.1 shows the period of fieldwork, number of households interviewed and household’s<br />

response rates. A total of 15,087 households were interviewed, three-fourth were rural. The overall<br />

household response rate – the number of households interviewed per 100 occupied households<br />

was 99.8 percent. The household response rate was 97 percent or more in every district.<br />

Table 1.2 gives number of women and husbands interviewed by district in Jammu & Kashmir<br />

state. Number of interviews completed was 10,308 currently married women who are the usual<br />

member of the household or stayed night before the household interview and 10,239 husbands of<br />

eligible women. The response rate for women - number of women interviewed per 100 identified<br />

eligible women was 95.7 percent. Similarly, response rate for husbands was 95.3 percent. The response<br />

6


Table 1.1 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS INTERVIEWED<br />

Month and year of fieldwork and number of households interviewed by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

State/<strong>District</strong><br />

Month and year<br />

of field work<br />

Number of households interviewed<br />

From To Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Response<br />

rate<br />

State<br />

State-phase I<br />

State-phase II<br />

-<br />

<strong>04</strong>/<strong>2002</strong><br />

07/20<strong>04</strong><br />

-<br />

12/2003<br />

12/20<strong>04</strong><br />

15,087<br />

-<br />

-<br />

11,310<br />

-<br />

-<br />

3,777<br />

-<br />

-<br />

99.8<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Kathua<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

12/<strong>2002</strong><br />

07/<strong>2002</strong><br />

<strong>04</strong>/<strong>2002</strong><br />

07/2003<br />

12/<strong>2002</strong><br />

07/<strong>2002</strong><br />

08/<strong>2002</strong><br />

02/2003<br />

12/<strong>2002</strong><br />

09/<strong>2002</strong><br />

12/2003<br />

03/2003<br />

12/<strong>2002</strong><br />

02/2003<br />

1,092<br />

1,110<br />

1,112<br />

1,118<br />

1,092<br />

1,087<br />

1,102<br />

761<br />

608<br />

775<br />

782<br />

1,092<br />

1,087<br />

768<br />

331<br />

502<br />

337<br />

336<br />

0<br />

0<br />

334<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

99.9<br />

99.6<br />

100.0<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Kargil<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

09/20<strong>04</strong><br />

08/20<strong>04</strong><br />

09/20<strong>04</strong><br />

08/20<strong>04</strong><br />

07/20<strong>04</strong><br />

08/20<strong>04</strong><br />

07/20<strong>04</strong><br />

11/20<strong>04</strong><br />

12/20<strong>04</strong><br />

10/20<strong>04</strong><br />

10/20<strong>04</strong><br />

12/20<strong>04</strong><br />

11/20<strong>04</strong><br />

12/20<strong>04</strong><br />

1,123<br />

1,110<br />

1,119<br />

931<br />

1,076<br />

944<br />

1,071<br />

760<br />

778<br />

784<br />

931<br />

751<br />

686<br />

747<br />

363<br />

332<br />

335<br />

0<br />

325<br />

258<br />

324<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

97.3<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Note: Table based on unweighted cases.<br />

of women was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula and Poonch districts and the lowest (69<br />

percent) in Badgam district, while it was 96 percent for the state. Further, women’s response rate<br />

was higher than that of the state in eight districts and lower than that of the state in sis districts.<br />

Similarly, response rate of husband’s was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula and Poonch<br />

districts and the lowest (64 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 95 percent for the state. The<br />

response rate of husbands was higher than that of the state in Doda, Jammu, Kathua, Poonch,<br />

Rajouri, Udhampur, Anantnag, Baramula, Kupwara and Pulwama districts, while in the remaining<br />

four districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />

Table 1.2 NUMBER OF WOMEN AND HUSBANDS INTERVIEWED<br />

Number of women and husbands interviewed by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

State/<strong>District</strong><br />

Number of women interviewed<br />

Response<br />

Number of husbands interviewed<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban rate Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Response<br />

rate<br />

State<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

95.7<br />

10,239<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

95.3<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Kathua<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

779<br />

854<br />

763<br />

878<br />

824<br />

614<br />

969<br />

551<br />

514<br />

534<br />

599<br />

824<br />

614<br />

757<br />

228<br />

340<br />

229<br />

279<br />

0<br />

0<br />

212<br />

99.6<br />

98.4<br />

99.0<br />

100.0<br />

99.0<br />

88.2<br />

99.8<br />

776<br />

838<br />

736<br />

878<br />

822<br />

590<br />

964<br />

548<br />

500<br />

516<br />

599<br />

822<br />

590<br />

757<br />

228<br />

338<br />

220<br />

279<br />

0<br />

0<br />

207<br />

99.2<br />

96.5<br />

97.4<br />

100.0<br />

98.8<br />

84.8<br />

99.7<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Kargil<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

698<br />

432<br />

881<br />

475<br />

831<br />

484<br />

826<br />

511<br />

308<br />

625<br />

475<br />

597<br />

349<br />

593<br />

187<br />

124<br />

256<br />

0<br />

234<br />

135<br />

233<br />

98.6<br />

68.8<br />

100.0<br />

95.0<br />

95.2<br />

94.2<br />

95.2<br />

698<br />

400<br />

881<br />

473<br />

851<br />

484<br />

848<br />

511<br />

289<br />

625<br />

473<br />

612<br />

349<br />

610<br />

187<br />

111<br />

256<br />

0<br />

239<br />

135<br />

238<br />

98.6<br />

63.9<br />

100.0<br />

94.6<br />

97.5<br />

94.2<br />

97.7<br />

Note: Table based on unweighted cases.<br />

7


1.9 Basic Demographic Profile of the State<br />

Strategically located Jammu & Kashmir State constitutes the northern most extremity of India.<br />

Situated between 32 0 17’ and 36 0 58’ north latitude and 73 0 26’ and 80 0 30’ east longitude. The<br />

total area of the State is 22,22,236 sq. kms. including 78,114 sq. kms. under the illegal occupation of<br />

Pakistan and 42,685 sq. kms. under that of China, of which Pakistan illegally handed over 5,130 sq.<br />

kms. to China. The state is bounded by Pakistan, Afghanistan and China from the West to East.<br />

The State has four geographical zones of<br />

1. Sub-mountain and semi-mountain plain known as kandi or dry belt,<br />

2. The Shivalak ranges.<br />

3. The high mountain zone consisting the Kashmir Valley, Pir Panchal ranges and its offshoots<br />

including Doda, Poonch and Rajouri districts and part of Kathuaand Udhampur<br />

districts.<br />

4. The middle run of the Indus River comprising Leh and Kargil.<br />

The State of Jammu & Kashmir is the northern most state of India comprising three distinct<br />

climatic regions viz. Arctic cold desert areas of Ladakh, temperate Kashmir valley and sub-tropical<br />

region of Jammu. There is a sharp rise of altitude from 1,000 feet to 28,250 feet above sea level<br />

within state’s four degree of latitude. The climate varies from tropical in Jammu plains to semi-arctic<br />

cold in Ladakh with Kashmir and Jammu mountainous tracts having temperate climatic conditions.<br />

The rainfall also varies from region to region with 92.6 mm in Leh, 650.5 mm in Srinagar and 1115.9<br />

mm in Jammu. A large part of the state forms part of the Himalayan Mountains. The state is geographically<br />

constituted of rocks varying from the oldest period of the earth’s history to the youngest present day<br />

river and lake deposits. The population of Jammu & Kashmir state was 101. 43 lakh in 2001. The State<br />

ranks 6 th in area and 17 th in population among the States and Union Territories of India. The State<br />

consists of 14 districts, 59 tehsils. 119 blocks, three municipalities, 54 towns and notified area<br />

committee, 6477 inhabited villages and 281 uninhabited villages.<br />

The State is well connected with rest of the country by air, rail and road. The Indian<br />

Airlines and private airlines operate regular flights to Srinagar, Jammu and Leh. The <strong>National</strong><br />

Highway 1-A connects the capital cities of Srinagar and Jammu with rest of the country. There are<br />

daily passenger trains connecting Jammu with most of the major cities of the country.<br />

Table 1.3 gives basic demographic indicators of Jammu & Kashmir State. The decadal growth<br />

rate of the Jammu & Kashmir State was 29.4 percent as against 21.5 of the country in 2001, the<br />

difference being eight percentage points. The state population was growing at a rate faster than that<br />

of the country. Further, the annual exponential growth rate was 2.55 percent for the state as<br />

against 1.95 percent for the country in 2001. The urban population of the state was 24.8 percent<br />

as against 28.0 percent of the country- the state was lagging behind the country in urbanization.<br />

The scheduled caste population in the state has declined from 15.8 percent in 1981 to 7.6 percent<br />

in 2001. On the other hand, schedule tribe population in the state has increased from 7.8 percent<br />

in 1981 to 10.9 percent in 2001. The female literacy rate was 43 percent in the state as against<br />

53.7 percent in the country in 2001 - difference of 11 percent points. The male literacy rate was 67<br />

percent in the state as against 75 percent in the country in 2001- difference of eight percent points. In<br />

8


Table 1.3 BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATOR<br />

Basic demographic indicator of India, state and districts, Census 2001<br />

India/state/district<br />

Population<br />

(in thousand)<br />

Percentage<br />

urban<br />

Percentage<br />

decadal<br />

growth rate 1<br />

Percentage literate 7+<br />

Sex<br />

ratio 2 Male Female Persons<br />

India<br />

1,028,737<br />

28.0<br />

21.5<br />

933<br />

75.3<br />

53.7<br />

64.8<br />

State<br />

10,143<br />

24.8<br />

29.4<br />

892<br />

66.6<br />

43.0<br />

55.5<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Kathua<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajouri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

692<br />

1,589<br />

550<br />

373<br />

483<br />

1,202<br />

743<br />

6.9<br />

44.1<br />

14.3<br />

6.4<br />

7.0<br />

78.7<br />

15.7<br />

26.8<br />

28.4<br />

20.9<br />

28.1<br />

25.2<br />

31.4<br />

26.9<br />

903<br />

868<br />

901<br />

919<br />

878<br />

851<br />

860<br />

64.0<br />

84.4<br />

75.7<br />

65.0<br />

69.8<br />

69.6<br />

67.1<br />

29.9<br />

68.5<br />

54.4<br />

36.0<br />

44.5<br />

48.1<br />

41.2<br />

47.9<br />

77.0<br />

65.6<br />

51.2<br />

58.0<br />

59.8<br />

55.2<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Kargil<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh<br />

Pulwama<br />

1,172<br />

629<br />

1,170<br />

119<br />

650<br />

117<br />

653<br />

14.4<br />

11.2<br />

33.5<br />

8.9<br />

3.9<br />

24.4<br />

10.5<br />

32.7<br />

26.5<br />

15.7<br />

31.4<br />

38.6<br />

30.4<br />

24.5<br />

922<br />

930<br />

947<br />

837<br />

906<br />

823<br />

945<br />

57.6<br />

53.5<br />

82.6<br />

75.8<br />

56.1<br />

75.6<br />

60.7<br />

34.4<br />

30.6<br />

67.2<br />

42.4<br />

28.7<br />

52.7<br />

37.7<br />

46.5<br />

42.5<br />

75.1<br />

60.8<br />

43.2<br />

65.3<br />

49.6<br />

Source: Primary Census Abstract, Series 20, Census of India, 2001. 1 1991-2001, 2 Females per 1,000 males.<br />

other words, male literacy rate is catching up with that of the country. The sex ratio was 892 in the<br />

state as against 933 in the country in 2001, which means that female deficiency was more serious<br />

in the state. The population density was 46 persons per km. in the state as against 313 persons<br />

per km. in the country in 2001.<br />

The percentage of urban population was the highest (79 percent) in Srinagar district,<br />

followed by 44 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (four percent) in Kupwara district. The<br />

percentage of urban population was higher than that of the state (25 percent) in Jammu, Srinagar<br />

and Baramula districts, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than that of the state. In<br />

five districts it was less than 10 percent. The decadal growth rate was the highest (38.6 percent)<br />

in Kupwara district, followed by 31.4 percent in Srinagar and Kargil districts and the lowest<br />

(15.7 percent) in Baramula district, while it was 29 percent for the state. The decadal growth rate<br />

was lower than that of the state in nine districts. The sex ratio was the highest (947) in Baramula<br />

district, followed by 945 in Pulwama district and the lowest (823) in Leh district, while it was 892<br />

in the state.<br />

The male literacy rate was the highest (84.4 percent) in Jammu district, followed by 82.6<br />

percent in Baramula district and the lowest (53.5 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 68.6<br />

percent in the state. Similarly, female literacy rate was the highest (68.5 percent) in Jammu<br />

district, followed by 67.2 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (28.7 percent) in Kupwara<br />

district, while it was 43 percent for the state. The sex differential in the literacy rate was the<br />

highest (34 percent points) in Doda district, followed by 33 percent points in Kargil district and<br />

the lowest (16 percent points) in Jammu district, while it was 26 percent points in the state.<br />

9


CHAPTER II<br />

BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLD<br />

This chapter provides a socio-economic and demographic profile of households interviewed in<br />

the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong>-Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong>. Facilities and services such<br />

as <strong>Health</strong>, Education and Communication available in the representative sampled village are also<br />

presented here. The de facto procedure of enumeration is adopted in order to include every individual<br />

staying in the sampled household the night before the survey. The objective of adopting the de<br />

facto method is to avoid duplication of persons who are in transit.<br />

2.1 Age –Sex Structure<br />

Table 2.1 gives percent distribution of the household population by age and by residence and sex<br />

in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percent distribution is based on sampled de facto population of<br />

81,594 persons of whom 79 percent lived in the rural areas and 21 percent in urban areas of<br />

Delhi. The NCT of Delhi depicts a young and growing population with 30 percent below the age<br />

of 15 years (Figure 2.1). There are more children below 15 years recorded in rural areas (31<br />

percent) compared to those in urban areas (27 percent).<br />

Figure 2.1<br />

Age-sex pyramid<br />

80+<br />

75-79<br />

70-74<br />

65-69<br />

60-64<br />

55-59<br />

50-54<br />

45-49<br />

40-44<br />

35-39<br />

30-34<br />

25-29<br />

20-24<br />

15-19<br />

10-14<br />

5-9<br />

0-4<br />

Female<br />

Male<br />

8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8<br />

Percent<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

The overall sex ratio of sample population was 110 males per 100 females as against 112<br />

of 2001 census. The sex ratio of the rural sample population was 111 as against 109 of the census.<br />

Similarly, sex ratio of sample urban population was 107 as against 122 of the census.


Table 2.1 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY AGE AND SEX<br />

Percent distribution of the household population by age and by residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Age<br />

Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />

Less than 1<br />

0.8<br />

1-4<br />

5.9<br />

5-9<br />

11.4<br />

10-14<br />

12.2<br />

15-19<br />

12.2<br />

20-24<br />

9.4<br />

25-29<br />

8.2<br />

30-34<br />

7.3<br />

35-39<br />

7.5<br />

40-44<br />

5.4<br />

45-49<br />

6.7<br />

50-54<br />

3.9<br />

55-59<br />

2.9<br />

60-64<br />

2.4<br />

65-69<br />

1.7<br />

70-74<br />

1.0<br />

75-79<br />

0.5<br />

80+<br />

0.5<br />

Total percent 100.0<br />

Number of<br />

persons<br />

81,594<br />

Sex ratio 1 110<br />

0.7<br />

6.1<br />

11.5<br />

12.0<br />

11.8<br />

9.5<br />

7.9<br />

7.0<br />

7.3<br />

6.1<br />

5.8<br />

4.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.7<br />

1.8<br />

1.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

42,777<br />

NA<br />

0.8<br />

5.7<br />

11.3<br />

12.5<br />

12.5<br />

9.4<br />

8.6<br />

7.7<br />

7.7<br />

4.6<br />

7.7<br />

3.3<br />

2.9<br />

2.1<br />

1.5<br />

0.9<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

100.0<br />

38,818<br />

NA<br />

0.7<br />

6.0<br />

11.9<br />

12.6<br />

12.3<br />

9.4<br />

8.1<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

5.4<br />

6.4<br />

3.7<br />

2.8<br />

2.3<br />

1.6<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

100.0<br />

62,681<br />

111<br />

0.7<br />

6.1<br />

12.0<br />

12.2<br />

12.1<br />

9.5<br />

7.9<br />

7.0<br />

7.2<br />

6.1<br />

5.6<br />

4.3<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

1.8<br />

1.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

33,001<br />

NA<br />

0.8<br />

5.9<br />

11.7<br />

13.1<br />

12.6<br />

9.2<br />

8.4<br />

7.8<br />

7.7<br />

4.7<br />

7.3<br />

3.0<br />

2.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.5<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

100.0<br />

29,680<br />

NA<br />

0.8<br />

5.7<br />

9.8<br />

11.0<br />

11.6<br />

9.6<br />

8.6<br />

7.3<br />

7.7<br />

5.3<br />

7.6<br />

4.8<br />

3.3<br />

2.7<br />

1.9<br />

1.2<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

18,914<br />

107<br />

0.8<br />

6.0<br />

9.6<br />

11.3<br />

11.1<br />

9.2<br />

7.9<br />

7.2<br />

7.8<br />

6.1<br />

6.4<br />

5.2<br />

3.6<br />

3.0<br />

2.1<br />

1.2<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

9,776<br />

NA<br />

0.8<br />

5.3<br />

9.9<br />

10.6<br />

12.1<br />

9.9<br />

9.2<br />

7.3<br />

7.6<br />

4.5<br />

8.9<br />

4.4<br />

3.0<br />

2.3<br />

1.6<br />

1.3<br />

0.6<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

9,138<br />

NA<br />

Note: Table is based on the de facto population, i.e. persons who stayed in the household the night before the interview (including<br />

both usual resident and visitors).<br />

1<br />

Male per 100 females. NA: Not applicable.<br />

2.2 <strong>Household</strong> Characteristics<br />

Table 2.2 gives percent distribution of the household head by selected background characteristics<br />

of the household head and household size by residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />

of male household heads was 96 percent in the state – 97 percent in rural areas and 92 percent in<br />

urban areas. Similarly, percentage of female household head was four percent in the state – three<br />

percent in rural areas and eight percent in urban areas. Nearly three-fourth of the household head<br />

were in the age group 30-59 years and one-fifth in the age group 60+ years, while five percent<br />

household head were below 30 years. The median age of household heads was over 46 years in<br />

the state - 46 years in rural areas and 48 years in urban areas. Majority of the household heads<br />

were Muslim (64 percent) and 32 percent were Hindu, while the remaining four percent belongs<br />

to other religions. Hindus constitute a higher proportion of population in urban areas (53 percent)<br />

while Muslim constitute a higher proportion of population in rural areas (71 percent). Majority of<br />

the household heads were from other castes (58 percent), 18 percent from OBC, 12 percent scheduled<br />

tribe and 10 percent scheduled caste, while caste of over two percent household heads was not known.<br />

One-member households were less than one percent, while two-members households were<br />

three percent. Similarly, 3-5 members households were over 53 percent and 6-8 member households<br />

were over 36 percent. In other words, 11 percent of the households consisted of 1-3 usual members.<br />

12


Table 2.2 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Percent distribution of the household head by selected characteristics of the household head and household size, according to<br />

residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Characteristic<br />

Sex of the household head<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Age of the household head<br />

< 30<br />

30-44<br />

45-59<br />

60+<br />

Median age of the household head<br />

Religion of the household head<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Christian<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Missing<br />

Caste/tribe of the household head<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other #<br />

Don’t know<br />

Missing<br />

Total<br />

95.8<br />

4.2<br />

5.2<br />

38.8<br />

35.6<br />

20.4<br />

46.5<br />

32.3<br />

63.6<br />

0.3<br />

2.4<br />

1.2<br />

0.1<br />

10.3<br />

12.0<br />

17.6<br />

57.7<br />

2.2<br />

0.2<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

97.1<br />

2.9<br />

5.6<br />

40.3<br />

34.6<br />

19.5<br />

46.0<br />

25.5<br />

71.5<br />

0.2<br />

1.5<br />

1.1<br />

0.2<br />

9.9<br />

14.0<br />

20.0<br />

52.9<br />

2.9<br />

0.2<br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

92.1<br />

7.9<br />

4.1<br />

34.5<br />

38.3<br />

23.1<br />

48.1<br />

52.9<br />

40.0<br />

0.5<br />

5.1<br />

1.4<br />

0.1<br />

11.3<br />

5.9<br />

10.6<br />

72.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

Number of usual members<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9+<br />

Mean household size<br />

Total percent<br />

Number of households<br />

0.5<br />

3.2<br />

7.5<br />

19.6<br />

26.3<br />

18.9<br />

11.3<br />

6.3<br />

6.4<br />

5.4<br />

100.0<br />

15,088<br />

Note: Table is based on the de jure population<br />

# Higher caste (Not belonging to a scheduled caste, a scheduled tribe and an other backward class)<br />

0.3<br />

2.6<br />

6.9<br />

18.3<br />

26.1<br />

19.5<br />

12.2<br />

7.1<br />

7.0<br />

5.5<br />

100.0<br />

11,310<br />

1.1<br />

4.7<br />

9.2<br />

23.7<br />

26.8<br />

17.4<br />

8.4<br />

3.9<br />

4.8<br />

5.0<br />

100.0<br />

3,777<br />

Further, 46 percent households consisted of 4-5 members and over 36 percent households consisted of<br />

6-8 members. However, percentage of households consisting of 9+ usual members was over six<br />

percent in the state – seven percent in rural areas and five percent in urban areas. .<br />

2.3 Educational <strong>Level</strong><br />

Table 2.3 gives percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and<br />

years of schooling, according to age, sex and residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />

of non-literate population was 37 percent in the state- 47 percent females and 28 percent males. Over<br />

one-fifth of the population aged 7-9 years was non-literate irrespective of sex in the state. The<br />

proportion non-literate declines in the age group 10-14 years, which increases thereafter in each<br />

successive age group. So much so, more than 60 percent of the female population aged 30+ years<br />

13


Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />

Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age,<br />

residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Age<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

Total<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

Total<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

Nonliterate<br />

21.0<br />

8.8<br />

10.6<br />

17.3<br />

33.8<br />

40.7<br />

59.3<br />

28.2<br />

22.0<br />

14.1<br />

18.7<br />

39.0<br />

63.1<br />

74.8<br />

85.6<br />

46.6<br />

21.5<br />

11.4<br />

14.5<br />

27.8<br />

48.2<br />

57.2<br />

70.4<br />

Literate but<br />

no schooling<br />

0.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

14.2<br />

Years of schooling<br />

1-5 6-8 9-10<br />

TOTAL<br />

Male<br />

77.6 0.6 0.0<br />

40.4 46.7 3.7<br />

2.7 19.4 43.3<br />

3.7 11.4 26.3<br />

4.4 13.7 24.8<br />

4.5 11.4 26.2<br />

4.3 8.1 16.1<br />

76.1<br />

38.0<br />

2.9<br />

4.3<br />

5.6<br />

5.0<br />

3.5<br />

14.2<br />

76.9<br />

39.2<br />

2.8<br />

4.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.8<br />

4.0<br />

16.3<br />

Female<br />

0.7<br />

43.8<br />

17.4<br />

10.5<br />

8.3<br />

6.1<br />

3.6<br />

13.6<br />

Total<br />

0.6<br />

45.3<br />

18.4<br />

11.0<br />

11.1<br />

8.8<br />

6.2<br />

21.7<br />

0.0<br />

3.8<br />

40.5<br />

19.8<br />

12.7<br />

8.2<br />

4.4<br />

14.2<br />

0.0<br />

3.8<br />

42.0<br />

23.2<br />

18.9<br />

17.5<br />

11.2<br />

11 or<br />

more<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

24.0<br />

41.2<br />

23.3<br />

17.1<br />

12.1<br />

19.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

20.5<br />

26.4<br />

10.2<br />

5.8<br />

2.7<br />

11.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

22.3<br />

34.0<br />

16.9<br />

11.6<br />

8.1<br />

Missing<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Total<br />

Percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of<br />

persons<br />

2,725<br />

5,126<br />

5,066<br />

7,426<br />

6,135<br />

5,081<br />

6,133<br />

37,692<br />

2,442<br />

4,861<br />

4,854<br />

6,979<br />

5,947<br />

4,782<br />

4,482<br />

34,347<br />

5,167<br />

9,987<br />

9,921<br />

14,405<br />

12,083<br />

9,863<br />

10,615<br />

Total<br />

37.0<br />

0.1<br />

14.2<br />

15.0<br />

18.1<br />

15.5<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

72,<strong>04</strong>0<br />

Note: The table is based on de jure population<br />

Contd.<br />

was non-literate in the state. The percentage of non-literate population aged 50+ years was 70<br />

percent in the state - 86 percent females and 59 percent males. Further, 14 percent of the<br />

population aged 7 + years had 1-5 years of schooling in the state irrespective of sex. Over 16<br />

percent of males as against about 14 percent of females had 6-8 years schooling, while it was 15<br />

percent for the state. Similarly, 22 percent of males as against 14 percent of females had 9-10<br />

years of schooling, while it was 18 percent for the state. The percentage of population aged 7+<br />

years who had studied for 11 or more years was over 15 percent in the state – 11 percent females<br />

and 19 percent males. Figure 2.2 shows percentage literate by age and sex.<br />

More than three-fourth of males as well females aged 7-9 years had 1-5 years of schooling.<br />

Over four-tenth of males as against 38 percent of females aged 10-14 years have had 1-5 years of<br />

schooling. The sex differential in educational attainment starts after primary (1-5 years) education,<br />

when males are having edge over females in higher education of 6-8 years, 9-10 years and 11 or more<br />

years. However, only less than one percent of the total population are found literate without any<br />

formal schooling in the state irrespective of sex.<br />

An examination of the educational attainment by place of residence has revealed that the<br />

rural-urban differential was quite pronounced. Forty-one percent of the total population in rural<br />

14


Figure 2.2<br />

Percentage Literate by Age and Sex<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Percent<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

7-9 10-14 15-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50+<br />

Age<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />

Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age ,<br />

residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Age<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

Nonliterate<br />

23.5<br />

10.3<br />

12.2<br />

19.7<br />

38.0<br />

46.1<br />

69.2<br />

Literate<br />

but no<br />

schooling<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Years of schooling<br />

1-5 6-8 9-10<br />

RURAL<br />

Male<br />

75.0 0.5 0.0<br />

39.9 45.4 4.0<br />

3.1 20.9 42.4<br />

4.2 12.6 26.2<br />

4.7 13.8 24.5<br />

4.7 12.0 25.2<br />

3.9 6.7 13.2<br />

11 or<br />

more<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

21.3<br />

37.4<br />

19.0<br />

12.0<br />

7.0<br />

Missing<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Total<br />

Percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of<br />

persons<br />

2,179<br />

4,017<br />

3,979<br />

5,747<br />

4,670<br />

3,853<br />

4,530<br />

Total<br />

31.8<br />

0.1<br />

14.4<br />

16.6<br />

20.9<br />

16.1<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

28,975<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

24.7<br />

16.5<br />

21.7<br />

45.9<br />

70.6<br />

84.4<br />

94.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

73.4<br />

37.5<br />

3.1<br />

4.5<br />

5.6<br />

4.2<br />

2.4<br />

0.9<br />

42.5<br />

18.5<br />

10.9<br />

7.9<br />

4.7<br />

1.4<br />

Female<br />

0.0<br />

3.2<br />

39.9<br />

18.8<br />

9.7<br />

4.9<br />

1.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

16.7<br />

19.9<br />

6.1<br />

1.7<br />

0.4<br />

0.6<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,936<br />

3,895<br />

3,752<br />

5,229<br />

4,585<br />

3,558<br />

3,212<br />

Total<br />

52.0<br />

0.1<br />

14.2<br />

13.4<br />

12.5<br />

7.7<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

26,166<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

24.1<br />

13.4<br />

16.8<br />

32.2<br />

54.1<br />

64.5<br />

79.7<br />

0.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

74.2<br />

38.7<br />

3.1<br />

4.3<br />

5.2<br />

4.4<br />

3.3<br />

0.7<br />

44.0<br />

19.8<br />

11.8<br />

10.9<br />

8.5<br />

4.5<br />

Total<br />

0.0<br />

3.6<br />

41.2<br />

22.7<br />

17.2<br />

15.5<br />

8.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

19.1<br />

29.1<br />

12.6<br />

7.0<br />

4.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

4,115<br />

7,912<br />

7,731<br />

10,976<br />

9,256<br />

7,410<br />

7,742<br />

Total<br />

41.4<br />

0.1<br />

14.3<br />

15.1<br />

16.9<br />

12.1<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

55,141<br />

Contd.<br />

areas as against over 22 percent in urban areas was non-literate. Again, 17 percent of the population<br />

in rural areas as against 22 percent of the population in urban areas had 9-10 years of schooling.<br />

15


Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />

Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age ,<br />

residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Age<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

Nonliterate<br />

10.9<br />

3.2<br />

4.4<br />

9.3<br />

20.4<br />

23.8<br />

31.6<br />

Literate<br />

but no<br />

schooling<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Years of schooling<br />

1-5 6-8 9-10<br />

URBAN<br />

Male<br />

88.1 0.8 0.0<br />

42.2 51.4 2.8<br />

1.4 13.8 46.6<br />

2.2 7.6 26.7<br />

3.3 13.5 25.7<br />

4.1 9.5 29.3<br />

5.4 12.0 24.2<br />

11 or<br />

more<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

33.9<br />

54.2<br />

37.1<br />

33.4<br />

26.6<br />

Missing<br />

0.1<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

Total<br />

Percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of<br />

persons<br />

546<br />

1,109<br />

1,088<br />

1,679<br />

1,465<br />

1,228<br />

1,603<br />

Total<br />

16.0<br />

0.0<br />

13.6<br />

15.6<br />

24.2<br />

30.5<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

8,717<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

11.7<br />

4.5<br />

8.4<br />

18.3<br />

38.0<br />

46.8<br />

63.0<br />

1.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.4<br />

86.6<br />

40.0<br />

2.0<br />

3.6<br />

5.3<br />

7.6<br />

6.3<br />

0.0<br />

48.9<br />

13.6<br />

9.3<br />

9.6<br />

10.2<br />

9.3<br />

Female<br />

0.0<br />

6.3<br />

42.6<br />

22.6<br />

23.0<br />

17.8<br />

12.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

33.4<br />

46.0<br />

24.1<br />

17.7<br />

8.6<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

506<br />

966<br />

1,102<br />

1,750<br />

1,362<br />

1,224<br />

1,270<br />

Total<br />

29.4<br />

0.2<br />

14.1<br />

14.2<br />

19.7<br />

22.3<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

8,181<br />

7-9<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-29<br />

30-39<br />

40-49<br />

50+<br />

11.3<br />

3.8<br />

6.4<br />

13.9<br />

28.9<br />

35.2<br />

45.5<br />

0.6<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

87.4<br />

41.2<br />

1.7<br />

3.0<br />

4.2<br />

5.8<br />

5.8<br />

0.4<br />

50.2<br />

13.7<br />

8.4<br />

11.6<br />

9.8<br />

10.8<br />

Total<br />

0.0<br />

4.4<br />

44.6<br />

24.6<br />

24.4<br />

23.6<br />

19.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

33.6<br />

50.0<br />

30.8<br />

25.5<br />

18.7<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,052<br />

2,075<br />

2,190<br />

3,429<br />

2,827<br />

2,452<br />

2,873<br />

Total<br />

22.5<br />

0.1<br />

13.9<br />

14.9<br />

22.0<br />

26.5<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

16,898<br />

Similarly, 12 percent of the population in rural areas as against over 26 percent in urban areas<br />

had 11 or more years of schooling. On the other hand, there was no rural-urban differential for<br />

the educational level 1-5 years and 6-8 years.<br />

Further, percentage of non-literate males was 32 percent in rural areas as against 16<br />

percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of non-literate females was 52 percent in rural areas<br />

as against 29 in urban areas. Again, percentage of males who had studied for 9-10 years was 21<br />

percent in rural areas as against 24 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of females who<br />

had studied for 9-10 years was over 12 percent in rural areas as against 20 percent in urban areas.<br />

The percentage of males who had studied for 11 or more years was 16 percent in rural areas as<br />

against over 30 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of females who had studied for 11 or<br />

more years was eight percent in rural areas as against 22 percent in urban areas. The rural-urban<br />

differential was 14 percentage points both for females and males.<br />

2.4 Marital Status of the <strong>Household</strong> Population<br />

Table 2.4 gives percent distribution of household population aged 10 years and above by<br />

16


Table 2.4 MARITAL STATUS OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />

Percent distribution of the household population aged 10 years and above by marital status, according to age and sex, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Marital status<br />

Age<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-44<br />

45-59<br />

60+<br />

Never<br />

Married<br />

97.3<br />

96.9<br />

91.4<br />

58.5<br />

7.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

Currently<br />

married<br />

2.1<br />

2.3<br />

7.6<br />

40.8<br />

91.7<br />

94.4<br />

81.8<br />

Married, gaunna<br />

not performed<br />

Male<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

0.3<br />

1.0<br />

2.3<br />

Widowed/ divorced/<br />

Separated<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.3<br />

0.7<br />

3.7<br />

15.2<br />

Total Percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of persons<br />

5,126<br />

5,066<br />

4,051<br />

3,375<br />

8,753<br />

5,668<br />

2,927<br />

Total<br />

46.5<br />

50.6<br />

0.8<br />

2.1<br />

100.0<br />

34,967<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-44<br />

45-59<br />

60+<br />

97.5<br />

97.1<br />

73.1<br />

22.0<br />

1.6<br />

0.5<br />

1.1<br />

1.7<br />

2.3<br />

26.4<br />

77.1<br />

96.7<br />

91.6<br />

58.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

2.2<br />

Female<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

1.2<br />

6.9<br />

38.5<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

4,861<br />

4,854<br />

3,642<br />

3,337<br />

7,743<br />

5,390<br />

2,079<br />

Total<br />

40.8<br />

54.4<br />

0.7<br />

4.0<br />

100.0<br />

31,906<br />

10-14<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-44<br />

45-59<br />

60+<br />

97.4<br />

97.0<br />

82.7<br />

40.4<br />

4.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.9<br />

1.9<br />

2.3<br />

16.5<br />

58.8<br />

94.1<br />

93.0<br />

72.0<br />

0.7<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

2.3<br />

Total<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

5.3<br />

24.8<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

9,987<br />

9,921<br />

7,693<br />

6,711<br />

16,496<br />

11,058<br />

5,006<br />

Total<br />

43.8<br />

52.4<br />

0.8<br />

3.0<br />

100.0<br />

66,873<br />

Note: Table is based on de facto population<br />

marital status, according to age and sex in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of currently married<br />

females was two percent in the age group 10-14 years, over two percent in the age group 15-19 years, 26<br />

percent in the age group 20-24 years, followed by 77 percent in the age group 25-29 years and 97<br />

percent in the age group 30-44 years. The proportion never married in the age group 30-44 years was<br />

over seven percent for males and about two percent for females. The proportion of divorced, separated<br />

or widowed was negligible and limited for both the sexes until below 60 years of age. The proportion of<br />

divorced, separated or widowed in the age group 60 years or above was over 38 percent for females and<br />

15 percent for males. Among the de facto population aged 10 years and above, 51 percent of males and<br />

54 percent of females were currently married.<br />

2.5 Marriage<br />

Marriage in the household is an important event that reflects the socio-cultural practices of the<br />

communities surveyed in DLHS. This section outlines the marriages ceremonies during the three<br />

years period prior to the survey. Mean age at marriage by sex and percentage of total marriages<br />

which are below legal age at marriage, 21 years for boys and 18 years for girls by resident at the<br />

state and at district levels are shown in Table 2.5. The mean age at marriage of boys was the highest<br />

(27.6 years) in Leh district, followed by 27.5 years in Udhampur district and the lowest (22.3 years)<br />

in Srinagar district. The mean age at marriage of boys was higher than that of the state (25.9 years) in<br />

17


Table 2.5 MARRIAGE<br />

Mean age at marriage and percentage of marriages below legal at marriage by sex and by districts, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Place of residence/<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Mean age at marriage<br />

Percentage of marriage below legal age at marriage<br />

Boy Girl Boy (


Table 2.6 MORBIDITY RATES<br />

Prevalence of blindness, tuberculosis, and malaria, according to place of residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Morbidity<br />

Prevalence rate of blindness<br />

Male<br />

Partial<br />

Complete<br />

Night blindness<br />

Total<br />

854<br />

299<br />

131<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

983<br />

347<br />

132<br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

410<br />

140<br />

130<br />

Female<br />

Partial<br />

Complete<br />

Night blindness<br />

738<br />

191<br />

173<br />

880<br />

203<br />

123<br />

280<br />

161<br />

334<br />

Persons<br />

Partial<br />

Complete<br />

Night blindness<br />

799<br />

248<br />

151<br />

934<br />

277<br />

128<br />

347<br />

145<br />

233<br />

Prevalence rate of tuberculosis<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Person<br />

253<br />

214<br />

234<br />

284<br />

247<br />

265<br />

150<br />

118<br />

135<br />

Prevalence rate of malaria 1<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Person<br />

95<br />

123<br />

108<br />

111<br />

134<br />

122<br />

40<br />

87<br />

63<br />

Note: All the rates refer to de jure population. Prevalence rate per 100, 000 population<br />

Reference period: - January 1 st , 1999 to survey date for phase-1, and January 1 st , 2001 to survey date for phase-2. 1 Last two<br />

weeks prior to the survey<br />

females, while it was 799 for the population. In other words, prevalence of partial blindness was<br />

more among males than among females, and more in rural areas than in urban areas. Similarly,<br />

prevalence rate of complete blindness was 277 in rural areas and 145 in urban areas, while it was<br />

248 for the state. The prevalence rate of complete blindness was 299 for males and 191 for<br />

females, while it was 248 for the population. The data have shown that prevalence of complete<br />

blindness was more among males than among females, and more in rural areas than in urban<br />

areas. The prevalence rate of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was 128 in rural areas<br />

and 233 in urban areas. The prevalence rate of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was<br />

131 among males and 173 among females, while it was 151 for the population. The prevalence<br />

of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was more among females than among males.<br />

Tuberculosis<br />

The prevalence rate of tuberculosis was 265 in rural areas and 135 in urban areas, while it was<br />

234 for the state. Again, prevalence rate of tuberculosis was 253 for males and 214 for females,<br />

while it was 234 for the population. These data have shown that prevalence of tuberculosis was<br />

higher among males than among females, and higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />

Malaria<br />

In the DLHS-RCH, household respondents were asked to state whether any member of their household<br />

suffered from malaria (characterized by recurrent fever with shivering) any time during the<br />

two weeks prior to survey. The prevalence rate of malaria was 122 in rural areas and 63 in urban<br />

19


areas, while it was 108 for the state. Again, prevalence rate of malaria was 95 for males and 123<br />

for females, while it was 108 for the population. In other words, prevalence of malaria was higher in<br />

rural areas than urban areas, and higher among females than among males.<br />

2.7 Morbidity Rates by <strong>District</strong>s<br />

Table 2.7 gives prevalence rate of blindness, tuberculosis and malaria by district in Jammu & Kashmir<br />

State. The prevalence rate of partial blindness was the highest (2275) in Srinagar district, followed by<br />

1773 in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero) in Baramula district, while it was 799 for the state.<br />

The prevalence rate of complete blindness was the highest (871) in Kathua district, followed by<br />

619 in Jammu district and the lowest (11) in Baramula district. The prevalence rate of complete<br />

blindness was lower than that of the state (248) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Doda, Kargi,<br />

Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch, Rajouri and Udhampur districts, while in the remaining three<br />

districts it was higher than that of the state.<br />

Table 2.7 MORBIDITY RATES BY DISTRICTS<br />

Prevalence of blindness, tuberculosis, and malaria, by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Prevalence 1 of morbidity<br />

Partial blindness Complete blindness Tuberculosis Malaria 2<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

678<br />

942<br />

0<br />

26<br />

161<br />

73<br />

59<br />

11<br />

15<br />

619<br />

82<br />

1<strong>04</strong><br />

0<br />

27<br />

96<br />

198<br />

20<br />

0<br />

14<br />

139<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

337<br />

249<br />

1,664<br />

217<br />

1,773<br />

246<br />

871<br />

43<br />

214<br />

34<br />

273<br />

401<br />

869<br />

60<br />

845<br />

209<br />

376<br />

19<br />

136<br />

11<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

18<br />

373<br />

2,275<br />

390<br />

34<br />

80<br />

269<br />

190<br />

18<br />

25<br />

213<br />

129<br />

18<br />

160<br />

130<br />

25<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

799<br />

Note: All the rates refer to de jure population. 1 Prevalence rate per 100, 000 population<br />

Reference period: - January 1 st , 1999 to survey date for phase-1, and January 1 st , 2001 to survey date for phase-2. 2 Last two<br />

weeks prior to the survey<br />

Further, prevalence rate of tuberculosis was the highest (869) in Kupwara district, followed<br />

by 845 in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero) in Baramula district. The prevalence rate of<br />

tuberculosis was higher than that of the state (234) in Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama districts,<br />

while in the remaining 10 districts it was lower than that of the state. The prevalence rate of malaria<br />

was the highest (376) in Kathua district, followed by 209 in Kargil district and the lowest (zero)<br />

in Baramula district, while it 108 for the state.<br />

2.8 Housing Characteristics<br />

Table 2.8 gives percent distribution of the household by housing characteristics and percentage<br />

of households owning selected durable goods by residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. Eighty<br />

percent of the households were having electricity connection in the state – 76 percent in rural areas<br />

248<br />

234<br />

108<br />

20


and 94 percent in urban areas. In other words, about one-fourth of the households were not having<br />

any electricity connection in rural areas of the state.<br />

The percentage of household having tap inside the house as source of drinking water was<br />

38 percent in the state – 29 percent in rural areas and 67 percent in urban areas. Similarly, 34<br />

percent of the households in rural areas as against 18 percent in urban areas were getting drinking<br />

water through public tap, while it was 30 percent in the state. Thus, over 68 percent of the<br />

households were having tap as source of drinking water in the state – 63 percent in rural areas<br />

and 84 percent in urban areas. The other sources of safe drinking water were ‘hand pump/bore<br />

well’ (12 percent) and ‘well covered’ (two percent). Thus, 82 percent of the households were<br />

getting safe drinking water to drink in the state – 77 percent in rural areas and 97 percent in urban<br />

areas. That is, about one-fourth of the households were not getting potable water for drinking in rural<br />

areas of the state.<br />

The percentage of the households having own flush toilets was 30 percent in the state –<br />

19 percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. Similarly, household having own pit<br />

toilet/latrine was 37 percent in the state- 41 percent in rural areas and over 23 percent in urban<br />

areas. Further, percentage of households using shared toilet of any type was 11 percent and two<br />

percent were using public/community toilets. The percentage of households having no toilet<br />

facility was 21 percent in the state – 26 percent in rural areas and seven percent in urban areas.<br />

DLHS-RCH has also collected data on type of fuel used in the households for cooking.<br />

Thirty-eight percent of the households were using liquid petroleum/gas or electricity for cooking<br />

in the state – 27 percent in rural areas and 68 percent in urban areas. Only 12 percent of the<br />

households were using kerosene for cooking food. Again, over 42 percent of the households<br />

were using wood in the state - 49 percent in rural areas and 22 percent in urban areas. Nine percent<br />

of the households in rural areas as against three percent households in urban areas were using<br />

other types of fuel for cooking, while it was over seven percent for the state.<br />

There is considerable variation in the quality of housing. On the basis of building material,<br />

type of floor, walls and roof, households are categorised into kachcha, semi-pucca and pucca.<br />

Sixteen percent of the households were living in kachcha houses, 51 percent in semi pucca<br />

houses and 33 percent in pucca houses. Sixty-one percent of the urban households live in pucca<br />

houses, while 57 percent of rural households live in semi-pucca houses.<br />

The possession of consumer durable goods is an indication of a household’s socioeconomic<br />

status. Table 2.8 shows that majority of the households in the state owned fan (60<br />

percent), radio/transistor (80 percent) and television (62 percent). Other durable goods owned by<br />

the household were telephone (14 percent), sewing machine (35 percent), bicycle (15 percent) and<br />

motorcycle/scooter (11 percent). Over three percent of the households owned Car/jeep, while over<br />

one percent households owned tractor. Ownership of most of the consumer durable items is more<br />

among the urban households than among the rural households.<br />

Considering household amenities, such as, source of drinking water, type of house,<br />

source of lighting, fuel for cooking, toilet facility and ownership of durable goods a composite<br />

measure, standard of living index (SLI) is made for classification of households. The standard of<br />

living index is calculated as by adding the following scores;<br />

21


Table 2.8 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Percent distribution of the household by housing characteristics and percentage of households owing selected durable goods,<br />

according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Housing characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Electricity<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

80.4<br />

19.4<br />

75.9<br />

23.9<br />

94.0<br />

5.9<br />

Source of drinking water<br />

Tap inside<br />

Tap shared public<br />

Hand pump/ bore well<br />

Well covered<br />

Well uncovered<br />

River<br />

Pond<br />

Spring<br />

Other<br />

38.4<br />

30.1<br />

11.7<br />

2.1<br />

3.6<br />

3.7<br />

1.7<br />

8.4<br />

0.1<br />

28.9<br />

34.2<br />

11.5<br />

2.6<br />

4.7<br />

4.8<br />

2.1<br />

10.7<br />

0.2<br />

66.7<br />

17.7<br />

12.1<br />

0.7<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.5<br />

1.4<br />

0.0<br />

Sanitation facility<br />

Own flush toilet<br />

Own pit toilet / latrine<br />

Shared toilet of any type<br />

Public / community toilet<br />

No toilet facility<br />

29.7<br />

36.6<br />

10.6<br />

1.7<br />

21.1<br />

18.7<br />

41.0<br />

12.7<br />

1.7<br />

25.7<br />

62.7<br />

23.5<br />

4.5<br />

1.8<br />

7.3<br />

Main type of fuel used for cooking<br />

Liquid petroleum gas/ electricity<br />

Kerosene<br />

Wood<br />

Other<br />

37.6<br />

12.2<br />

42.5<br />

7.5<br />

27.3<br />

14.1<br />

49.3<br />

9.1<br />

68.4<br />

6.5<br />

22.3<br />

2.7<br />

Type of house<br />

Kachcha<br />

Semi - pucca<br />

Pucca<br />

16.0<br />

50.6<br />

33.2<br />

18.8<br />

57.2<br />

23.7<br />

7.8<br />

30.8<br />

61.4<br />

<strong>Household</strong> assets<br />

Fan<br />

Radio/transistor<br />

Sewing machine<br />

Television<br />

Telephone<br />

Bicycle<br />

Motor cycle/ scooter<br />

Car / Jeep<br />

Tractor<br />

60.5<br />

79.7<br />

34.7<br />

62.3<br />

13.7<br />

14.9<br />

10.6<br />

3.3<br />

1.4<br />

52.5<br />

79.1<br />

28.1<br />

54.7<br />

7.5<br />

14.2<br />

6.4<br />

2.3<br />

1.2<br />

84.5<br />

81.6<br />

54.8<br />

85.3<br />

32.5<br />

16.8<br />

23.0<br />

6.3<br />

2.1<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

20.6<br />

51.7<br />

27.7<br />

26.3<br />

56.4<br />

17.3<br />

3.5<br />

37.7<br />

58.8<br />

Number of households<br />

15,088<br />

11,310<br />

3,777<br />

Source of drinking water: 3 for Tap (own), 2 for Tap (shared), 1 for hand pump and well, and 0<br />

for other;<br />

Type of house: 4 for pucca, 2 for semi-pucca, and 0 for kachcha;<br />

Source of lighting: 2 for electricity, 1 for kerosene, and 0 for other;<br />

Fuel for cooking: 2 for LPG gas/electricity, 1 for kerosene and 0 for other;<br />

Toilet facility: 4 for own flush toilet, 2 for own pit toilet, 2 for shared toilet and 0 for no toilet;<br />

22


Ownership for items: 4 each for car and tractor, 3 each for television, telephone and<br />

motorcycle/scooter, and 2 each for fan, radio/transistor, sewing machine and bicycle.<br />

The total of the scores may vary from the lowest of a 0 to maximum of 40. On the basis of total<br />

score, households are divided into three categories as;<br />

a) Low – if total score is less than or equal to 9,<br />

b) Medium – if total score is greater than 9 but less than or equal to 19 and<br />

c) High – if total score is greater than 19.<br />

The percentage of households with low standard of living index was 21 percent, 52<br />

percent households were with medium standard of living index and 28 percent of the households<br />

were with high standard of living index. The percentage of households with high SLI was 59<br />

percent in urban areas, while percentage of households with medium SLI 56 percent in rural<br />

areas.<br />

2.9 Housing Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>s<br />

Table 2.9 gives selected housing characteristics by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The<br />

percentage of household with electricity was the highest (99.9 percent) in Baramula district,<br />

followed by over 97 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (10 percent) in Poonch district,<br />

while it was 80 percent for the state.<br />

The percentage of household with drinking water facility was the highest (100 percent) in<br />

Baramula district, followed by 98 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (18 percent) in<br />

Poonch district, while it was 82 percent for the state. The percentage of households with toilet<br />

facility was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 99.8 percent in Leh<br />

district and the lowest (18 percent) in Kathua district, while it was 79 percent for the state.<br />

Table 2.9 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS BY DISTRICT<br />

Selected housing characteristics by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

With<br />

electricity<br />

With<br />

drinking<br />

water 1<br />

Percentage of households:<br />

With toilet<br />

facility<br />

Using Liquid<br />

petroleum<br />

gas/<br />

electricity<br />

Living in<br />

pucca<br />

house<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

57.7<br />

91.5<br />

99.9<br />

19.5<br />

97.4<br />

78.4<br />

89.4<br />

100.0<br />

78.0<br />

98.0<br />

87.9<br />

99.0<br />

100.0<br />

98.2<br />

66.1<br />

27.5<br />

34.1<br />

8.8<br />

22.9<br />

73.0<br />

20.6<br />

24.1<br />

7.3<br />

10.2<br />

72.0<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

73.9<br />

96.6<br />

95.1<br />

96.7<br />

95.9<br />

61.9<br />

82.3<br />

87.3<br />

64.4<br />

91.5<br />

98.7<br />

18.3<br />

90.6<br />

99.8<br />

93.2<br />

21.7<br />

23.8<br />

22.4<br />

93.2<br />

20.3<br />

7.3<br />

56.2<br />

19.0<br />

11.7<br />

16.7<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

10.1<br />

49.4<br />

89.8<br />

91.5<br />

18.2<br />

57.6<br />

85.7<br />

59.8<br />

81.9<br />

52.0<br />

86.4<br />

39.1<br />

6.4<br />

31.8<br />

64.6<br />

36.2<br />

31.5<br />

24.0<br />

34.1<br />

33.6<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

80.4<br />

82.3<br />

78.7<br />

37.6<br />

33.2<br />

1<br />

That is piped or from a hand pump/bore well/ covered well<br />

23


The percentage of households using liquid petroleum gas/electricity for cooking was the<br />

highest (93 percent) in Leh district, followed by 73 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (six<br />

percent) in Poonch district, while it was 38 percent for the state. The percentage of households<br />

living in pucca houses was the highest (72 percent) in Jammu district, followed by 56 percent in<br />

Kathua district and the lowest (seven percent) in Baramula and Kargil districts, while it was 33<br />

percent for the state.<br />

2.10 Iodization of Salt<br />

Consumption of salt fortified with iodine is recommended to avoid miscarriages, brain disorders,<br />

cretinism and retarded psychomotor development. As per the Prevention of Food Adulteration<br />

Act, 1988, the minimum iodine content of edible salt is 30 parts per million (PPM) at the<br />

manufacturing level.<br />

In the DLHS-RCH survey, each interviewer was provided with a test kit to measure the<br />

level of iodine content of salt consumed by the surveyed households. The test results (Table 2.10)<br />

are classified by degree of ionization of salt and categorised by selected background<br />

characteristics. It is observed that only 45 percent of households used salt that contained a minimum<br />

Table 2.10 IODIZATION OF SALT<br />

Percent distribution of household heads by degree of Iodization of salt, according to selected background characteristics,<br />

Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Not<br />

Total<br />

Iodised 7ppm 15+ppm Other 1 percent<br />

Number of<br />

households<br />

Place of Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

8.1<br />

1.1<br />

53.3<br />

31.9<br />

37.9<br />

66.5<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

11,310<br />

3,777<br />

Education of the household heads<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

9.6<br />

5.0<br />

2.1<br />

49.8<br />

47.2<br />

45.5<br />

40.0<br />

46.9<br />

51.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.9<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

7,363<br />

3,031<br />

4,690<br />

Religion of household head<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

0.7<br />

9.5<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

46.0<br />

50.3<br />

35.4<br />

2.5<br />

50.7<br />

51.4<br />

40.1<br />

63.3<br />

97.5<br />

47.5<br />

1.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.0<br />

1.8<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

4,879<br />

9,601<br />

365<br />

177<br />

66<br />

Caste/tribe of the household head#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

2.2<br />

0.3<br />

7.8<br />

8.0<br />

51.0<br />

78.7<br />

58.2<br />

36.2<br />

44.5<br />

21.0<br />

33.7<br />

55.1<br />

2.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,551<br />

1,808<br />

2,657<br />

8,710<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

11.4<br />

7.2<br />

0.9<br />

67.1<br />

44.4<br />

40.5<br />

20.7<br />

47.7<br />

57.9<br />

0.7<br />

0.7<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

3,103<br />

7,805<br />

4,180<br />

Total<br />

6.3<br />

47.9<br />

45.0<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

15,088<br />

Note: Table includes 2 household heads with missing information on education and 22 on religion who are not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate persons with no years of schooling are also included. # Total number of cases may not add upto N due to do not know<br />

and missing cases. 1 Includes salt not at home, salt not tested, refused and missing cases.<br />

Ppm: Parts per million.<br />

24


ecommended 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content and over six percent of households used<br />

salt that is not iodized at all, while 48 percent used salt, which was inadequately iodized.<br />

The percentage of households using non-iodized salt was over six percent in the state –<br />

eight percent in rural areas and over one percent in urban areas. The percentage of households<br />

using non-iodized salt was the highest (10 percent) for non-literate household heads and the<br />

lowest (two percent) for household heads who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was<br />

five percent for household heads who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of<br />

households using non-iodized salt was the highest (over 11 percent) for households with low SLI<br />

and the lowest (one percent) for households with high SLI, while it was seven percent for<br />

households with medium SLI. More of Muslim (over nine percent) than Hindu (one percent)<br />

households were using non-iodized salt. Again, more of OBC and other caste (eight percent each)<br />

households were using non-iodized salt than SC/ST (around two percent) households.<br />

Over 53 percent of the households in rural areas and 32 percent of the households in<br />

urban areas were using inadequately iodised salt, while it was 48 percent for the state. The<br />

percentage of households using inadequately iodized salt was over 50 percent for Muslims households<br />

and those belonging to other religions, 46 percent for Hindus and 35 percent for Sikh<br />

households, while it was over two percent for Buddhist households. The percentage of households<br />

using inadequately iodized salt was the highest (79 percent) for scheduled tribe households,<br />

followed by 58 percent for OBC households and the lowest (36 percent) for other caste<br />

households. Further, percentage of the households using inadequately iodized salt was the<br />

highest (50 percent) for non-literate household heads and the lowest (45 percent) for household<br />

heads who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 47 percent for household heads who<br />

had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of the households using inadequately iodized salt<br />

was the highest (67 percent) for households with low SLI and the lowest (40 percent) for<br />

households with high SLI, while it was 44 percent for households with medium SLI.<br />

Over 66 percent of the households in urban areas as against 38 percent in rural areas were<br />

using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents, while it was 45 percent for the state. The<br />

percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest<br />

(97 percent) for Buddhist households, followed by 63 percent for Sikh households and the lowest<br />

(40 percent) for Muslim households, while it was 51 percent for Hindu households. The percentage<br />

of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest (55 percent)<br />

for other castes households, followed by 44 percent for scheduled caste households and the lowest<br />

(21 percent) for scheduled tribe households, while it was 34 percent for OBC households.<br />

The percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents<br />

was the highest (52 percent) for household heads who had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />

lowest (40 percent) for non-literate household heads, while it was 47 percent for household heads<br />

who had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or<br />

higher iodine contents was the highest (58 percent) for household with high SLI and the lowest (21<br />

percent) for households with low SLI, while it was 48 percent for households with medium SLI<br />

2.11 Iodization of Salt by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 2.11 gives percent distribution of household heads by degree of iodization of salt by district<br />

25


Table 2.11 IDOIZATION OF SALT BY DISTRICT<br />

Percent distribution of household heads by degree of idoization of salt by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> Not idoized 7ppm 15+ppm Other 1<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

11.8<br />

12.3<br />

6.3<br />

0.0<br />

1.1<br />

51.4<br />

27.1<br />

10.0<br />

100.0<br />

26.4<br />

36.8<br />

60.3<br />

83.7<br />

0.0<br />

71.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.3<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

1.7<br />

1.1<br />

21.3<br />

0.0<br />

20.1<br />

20.5<br />

49.3<br />

19.4<br />

0.7<br />

19.6<br />

77.4<br />

41.8<br />

59.2<br />

99.3<br />

60.1<br />

0.4<br />

7.8<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

96.1<br />

97.7<br />

94.3<br />

74.6<br />

3.9<br />

1.5<br />

5.6<br />

25.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

6.3<br />

47.9<br />

45.0<br />

0.7<br />

Note: Ppm: Parts per million. 1 Includes salt not at home, salt not tested, refused and missing cases<br />

in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of households using non-iodized salt was the highest<br />

(21 percent) in Kupwara district, followed by 20 percent in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Doda, Leh, Poonch. Rajouri, Srinagar and Udhampur districts, while it was over six<br />

percent for the state. The percentage of households using inadequately iodized salt was the<br />

highest (100 percent) in Doda district, followed by 98 percent in Rajouri district and the lowest<br />

(one percent) in Leh district, while it was 48 percent for the state. Further, percentage of the<br />

households using iodized salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest (99 percent)<br />

in Leh district, followed by 84 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />

district, while it was 45 percent for the state (see Map-2).<br />

2.12 Availability of Facility and Services to the <strong>Rural</strong> Population<br />

The DLHS-RCH collected information about surveyed village from knowledgeable persons such<br />

as, the ‘Sarpanch’ or ‘Pradhan’, (village head) or other village officials or other persons including<br />

‘teacher’ in the villages on health and educational facilities and other services available in the village.<br />

One important aspect was to know the distance of the village, if facility is not available within<br />

the village, covering various types of education facilities, including primary school, middle school,<br />

secondary school, higher secondary school, college, Gurujee scheme and ‘Madarsa’. Similarly<br />

information on the distance of the village, if health facility not available within the village, covering<br />

various types of health facility, including sub-centres, primary health centres (PHCs), community<br />

health centres/ <strong>Rural</strong> Hospitals (CHCs/RHs), Government dispensary, hospital, private clinic or<br />

hospitals and health facilities of Indian System of Medicine (ISM).<br />

Table 2.12 gives percent distribution of household population by distance from the<br />

nearest education facility in Jammu & Kashmir State. The data shows that 90 percent of the<br />

primary schools were situated within the village and 10 percent outside the village. Sixty-six<br />

percent of the middle schools were situated within the village and 23 percent outside the village<br />

but within five kms. of the village and the remaining beyond five kms. from the village. Twenty-eight<br />

percent of the secondary schools were situated within the village, 40 percent outside the village<br />

26


Table 2.12 DISTANCE FROM THE NEAREST EDUCATION FACILITY<br />

Percent distribution of rural household population by distance from the nearest education facility, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Distance from the village:<br />

Education facility<br />

Within<br />

village<br />

< 5 km 5-9 km 10+ km<br />

Don’t know/<br />

missing<br />

Total<br />

percent<br />

Primary School<br />

Middle School<br />

Secondary School<br />

Higher Secondary School<br />

College<br />

Gurujee Scheme<br />

Madarsa<br />

89.8<br />

65.9<br />

27.7<br />

15.1<br />

0.1<br />

1.0<br />

40.3<br />

6.2<br />

23.3<br />

40.3<br />

33.3<br />

6.2<br />

8.5<br />

9.3<br />

1.4<br />

3.3<br />

15.8<br />

28.2<br />

17.1<br />

4.9<br />

2.2<br />

0.0<br />

1.4<br />

7.4<br />

16.8<br />

68.8<br />

28.2<br />

12.1<br />

2.6<br />

6.1<br />

8.9<br />

6.5<br />

7.9<br />

57.5<br />

36.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />

but within five kms. of the village and 16 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while the remaining<br />

schools were situated 10 or more kms. from the village. Only 15 percent of the higher secondary<br />

schools were situated with the village, 33 percent outside the village but within five kms. of the<br />

village, 28 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village the remaining higher secondary schools were<br />

located 10 or more kms. of the village. Only over six percent of the colleges were located within<br />

five kms. of the village and 17 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while 69 percent of the colleges<br />

were locate 10 or more kms. of the village. Forty percent of the Madarassas were located within<br />

the village and the remaining outside the village.<br />

Table 2.13 gives percent distribution rural households population by distance from the<br />

nearest health facility in the state. Forty-eight percent of Sub-centres were located within the<br />

village and 24 percent outside the village but within five kms. of the village, while the remaining<br />

Sub-centres were located beyond five kms. of the village. More than one-third (35 percent) of<br />

the primary health centre were located within the village, 27 percent outside the village but within<br />

five kms. of the village and 21 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while the remaining PHCs<br />

were located 10 or more kms. of the village. More than one-half (58 percent) of the Sub- centre<br />

or PHC were located within the village and 23 percent outside the village but within five kms. of<br />

the village, while the remaining Sub-centres or PHC were locate beyond five kms. of the village.<br />

Forty percent of the Community health centre/Referral hospitals were located within five kms. of<br />

the village and the remaining beyond five kms. of the village. Fifty percent of the Government<br />

Table 2.13 DISTANCE FROM THE NEAERST HEALTH FACILITY<br />

Percent distribution of rural household population by distance from the nearest health facility, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Distance from the village:<br />

<strong>Health</strong> facility<br />

Within<br />

village<br />

< 5 km 5-9 km 10+ km<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> household population<br />

Don’t know/<br />

missing<br />

Total percent<br />

Sub-centre<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Either sub-centre or PHC<br />

Community health centre/<br />

Referral hospital<br />

Government dispensary<br />

Government hospital<br />

Private clinic<br />

Private hospital<br />

ISM health facility<br />

48.1<br />

35.4<br />

58.2<br />

14.3<br />

48.6<br />

6.2<br />

29.4<br />

15.0<br />

3.3<br />

24.1<br />

27.4<br />

22.7<br />

25.9<br />

28.5<br />

18.4<br />

17.9<br />

5.0<br />

9.6<br />

14.9<br />

20.7<br />

12.1<br />

20.4<br />

9.7<br />

24.1<br />

12.6<br />

15.8<br />

20.1<br />

8.2<br />

10.8<br />

3.3<br />

25.9<br />

6.7<br />

44.0<br />

27.8<br />

44.5<br />

32.7<br />

4.7<br />

5.7<br />

3.8<br />

13.6<br />

6.5<br />

7.2<br />

12.3<br />

19.7<br />

34.3<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />

27


dispensaries were located within the village and over 28 percent outside the village but within<br />

five kms. of the village, while the remaining dispensaries were located beyond five kms. from<br />

the village. One-fourth of the Government hospitals were located within five kms. of the village<br />

and the remaining beyond five kms. from the village. Twenty-nine percent of the private clinics<br />

and 15 percent of the private hospitals were located within the village. Thirteen percent of the<br />

ISM facilities were located within five kms. of the village and 33 percent were located 10 or more<br />

kms, from the village.<br />

Table 2.14 gives percentage of rural residents living in villages that have selected<br />

services in Jammu & Kashmir State. Over 85 percent of the rural residents were living in villages<br />

that have an anganwadi centres (a nursery school for children age 3-6 years) and 51 percent of<br />

the rural residents living in villages having anganwadi workers (Anganwadi workers provide integrated<br />

child development services) in the village.<br />

Less than one-fourth (over 22 percent) of the rural residents live in villages that have a<br />

private doctor, 13 percent live in villages with a visiting doctor, two percent with a homeopathy<br />

doctor, 10 percent with a village health guide, 42 percent with a trained birth attendant and 12<br />

percent with a traditional healer. More than one-half (55 percent) of the rural residents live in<br />

villages that have a Dai (Dai provides the services for the delivery).<br />

Table 2.14 AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES<br />

Percentage of rural residents living in villages that have selected services, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Services<br />

Percentage of rural Residents<br />

Anganwadi centre<br />

Anganwadi worker<br />

Private doctor<br />

Visiting doctor<br />

Homeopathic doctor<br />

Village health guide<br />

Trained birth attendant<br />

Traditional healer<br />

Dai<br />

84.5<br />

50.6<br />

22.5<br />

13.0<br />

2.0<br />

9.8<br />

42.0<br />

12.0<br />

55.0<br />

Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />

2.13 Availability of Education Facility and <strong>Health</strong> Services by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 2.15 gives selected facility and services of rural household population within village by district<br />

in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of the rural household population with primary or<br />

middle school within the village was the highest (100 percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kargil,<br />

Kathua, Kupwara, Leh and Pulwama districts and the lowest (71 percent) in Doda district, while<br />

it was 94 percent for the state. The percentage of rural household population having Sub-centre<br />

within the village was the highest (100 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 95 percent in<br />

Udhampur district and the lowest (16 percent) in Baramula district, while it was 48 percent for<br />

the state. The percentage of rural household population having PHC within the village was the<br />

highest (100 percent) in Leh district, followed by 74 percent in Kargil and Srinagar districs and<br />

the lowest (six percent) in Baramula district, while it was 35 percent for the state. Further, percentage<br />

of rural household population having any government health facility within the village was the<br />

highest (100 percent) in Kargil, Leh and Udhampur districts, followed by 91 percent in Anantnag<br />

district and the lowest (41 percent) in Rajouri district, while it was 75 percent for the state.<br />

28


Table 2.15 AVAILABILITY OF FACILITY AND SERVICES BY DISTRICT<br />

Selected facility and services of rural household population within village by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Primary or<br />

middle school Sub-centre PHCs<br />

Percentage of rural household population with:<br />

Any government<br />

Anganwadi<br />

health facility 1 Doctor 2 TBA 3 worker<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

93.3<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

70.7<br />

92.0<br />

24.2<br />

38.4<br />

16.4<br />

34.4<br />

46.3<br />

54.6<br />

44.6<br />

5.7<br />

7.5<br />

25.7<br />

91.3<br />

82.8<br />

75.6<br />

45.7<br />

66.8<br />

26.3<br />

68.0<br />

22.6<br />

0.0<br />

21.8<br />

11.5<br />

62.1<br />

53.0<br />

0.0<br />

49.2<br />

79.8<br />

69.0<br />

76.8<br />

2.6<br />

54.9<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

64.5<br />

46.2<br />

71.3<br />

52.0<br />

73.9<br />

32.6<br />

9.2<br />

100.0<br />

12.4<br />

100.0<br />

84.3<br />

60.5<br />

100.0<br />

67.7<br />

65.6<br />

61.8<br />

22.9<br />

97.9<br />

29.8<br />

48.5<br />

89.5<br />

25.3<br />

26.6<br />

29.5<br />

77.9<br />

16.5<br />

73.8<br />

56.4<br />

93.5<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

99.9<br />

99.1<br />

88.1<br />

78.3<br />

44.7<br />

41.0<br />

76.5<br />

95.2<br />

31.6<br />

25.8<br />

73.7<br />

56.5<br />

63.0<br />

41.0<br />

80.6<br />

100.0<br />

6.8<br />

61.4<br />

9.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.8<br />

81.1<br />

31.6<br />

100.0<br />

0.0<br />

92.8<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

93.6<br />

48.1<br />

35.4<br />

74.9<br />

27.3<br />

42.0<br />

50.6<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-center, primary health center, community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village 2 Either private or visiting doctor 3 Trained birth attendant<br />

The percentage of the rural household population having been visited either by private or<br />

by visiting doctors was the highest (98 percent) in Leh district, followed by 68 percent in Badgam<br />

district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district, while it was 27 percent for the state. The<br />

percentage of the rural household population having TBA within the village was the highest (100<br />

percent) in Udhampur district, followed by 89 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Doda district, while it was 42 percent for the state. The percentage of the rural<br />

household population having Anganwadi worker within the village was the highest (93 percent) in<br />

Pulwama and Rajouri districts, followed by 80 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Poonch. Srinagar and Udhampur districts, while it was 51 percent in the state.<br />

29


Map – 1<br />

Percent Girl Marrying Below Legal Age at Marriage<br />

30


Map-2<br />

Percentage of <strong>Household</strong>s Using Salt that Contains 15ppm <strong>Level</strong> of Iodine<br />

31


CHAPTER III<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN, HUSBANDS AND FERTILITY<br />

The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme is targeted towards the underprivileged<br />

section of the population, particularly, women and children. The utilization of RCH services provided<br />

across the country depends to a large extent on the characteristics of women, their husbands and<br />

episodes of pregnancies, miscarriages, abortions, number of children born to them and survival<br />

status of children. Age of women, marital duration, educational attainment, social background and<br />

living standard are important factors, which influence reproductive and child health. With this in<br />

view, the DLHS-RCH data were collected on demographic characteristics, such as current age,<br />

age at consummation of marriage and number of pregnancies, live births and surviving children<br />

from eligible women respondents of selected representative households. Information regarding<br />

household background characteristics was collected using a separate household questionnaire<br />

that covered religion and caste of head of household, type of house, source of drinking water and<br />

possession of consumer durables. Fertility preference of women in terms of timing and desire for<br />

additional children in comparison to the number of living children provides information on the<br />

need for reproductive and child health services.<br />

This chapter provides a comprehensive outline of distribution of currently married women<br />

by present age, age at consummation of marriage, duration of marriage, complete years of schooling,<br />

pregnancy episodes, children ever born and children surviving, along with social and economic<br />

characteristics of households the women represent.<br />

3.1 Background Characteristics of Women<br />

Table 3.1 gives percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 years by selected<br />

background characteristics, according to residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. About 58 percent<br />

of the currently married women were in the age group 20-34 years and a similar age distribution is<br />

observed both for urban and rural areas. Forty-two percent women were aged 35 years and<br />

above, while less than one percent women were aged below 20 years. Over 15 percent of women<br />

consummated their marriage before reaching 18 years as against 85 percent of the women who<br />

consummated their marriage at the age of 18 years and above in the state. Further, 12 percent of the<br />

women in urban areas as against 16 percent of the women in rural areas started cohabiting before 18<br />

years of age. Over 15 percent of the women were married for less than five years duration, 24<br />

percent for each 5-9 years and 10-14 years, and 37 percent for 15 years or more of duration.<br />

The distribution of the women by religion shows that 61 percent were Muslim as against<br />

35 percent Hindu and three Sikh, while the remaining over one percent women were from other<br />

religious groups. More of Hindu women are found in urban areas (57 percent) and more of Muslim<br />

women in rural areas (69 percent). Over 41 percent of the women belong to scheduled castes (11<br />

percent), scheduled tribes (13 percent) and other backward classes (17 percent) and 57 percent<br />

women were from other castes, while about two percent of the women who said ‘don’t know’<br />

were not sure about their caste. Sixty percent of women as against 34 percent of husbands were<br />

non-literate in the state. Similarly, 22 percent of women as against 36 percent of husbands had<br />

studied for 10 years and above in the state. These data have shown that there exists rural-urban<br />

differential in female literacy and that husbands are educationally better placed than their wives.


Table 3.1 BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF ELIGIBLE WOMEN<br />

Percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 by selected background characteristics, according to residence,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Age group<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

Age at consummation of marriage<br />

Below 18 years<br />

18 years & above<br />

Marital duration<br />

0-4<br />

5-9<br />

10-14<br />

15+<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Christian<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Caste/tribe<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other #<br />

Don’t know<br />

Education (Years of schooling)<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

Missing<br />

Husband’s education (Years of schooling)<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

Don’t know<br />

Missing<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

0.6<br />

8.1<br />

23.7<br />

25.8<br />

26.5<br />

15.4<br />

15.3<br />

84.7<br />

15.3<br />

23.9<br />

23.8<br />

37.0<br />

34.9<br />

61.1<br />

0.3<br />

2.6<br />

1.1<br />

11.2<br />

13.2<br />

17.1<br />

56.8<br />

1.6<br />

60.2<br />

17.8<br />

22.1<br />

0.0<br />

34.1<br />

19.2<br />

36.2<br />

10.3<br />

0.1<br />

20.9<br />

51.3<br />

27.8<br />

0.7<br />

8.3<br />

23.3<br />

25.8<br />

26.3<br />

15.5<br />

16.3<br />

83.7<br />

14.8<br />

23.9<br />

23.8<br />

37.6<br />

27.9<br />

69.0<br />

0.2<br />

1.8<br />

1.1<br />

10.9<br />

15.6<br />

19.3<br />

52.0<br />

2.1<br />

68.7<br />

17.1<br />

14.2<br />

0.0<br />

39.0<br />

19.4<br />

30.0<br />

11.5<br />

0.2<br />

26.4<br />

56.5<br />

17.1<br />

0.3<br />

7.4<br />

24.9<br />

25.7<br />

26.9<br />

14.8<br />

12.0<br />

88.0<br />

17.0<br />

24.0<br />

24.0<br />

35.0<br />

57.3<br />

35.9<br />

0.5<br />

5.0<br />

1.3<br />

12.2<br />

5.7<br />

10.0<br />

72.1<br />

0.0<br />

33.0<br />

19.8<br />

47.2<br />

0.0<br />

18.7<br />

18.4<br />

56.2<br />

6.7<br />

0.1<br />

3.4<br />

34.6<br />

62.0<br />

Number of women<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

# Not belonging to a scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward class.<br />

@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are included.<br />

The distribution of according to their standard of living index (SLI) shows that 21 percent<br />

women were with low SLI and 51 percent with medium SLI, while 28 percent women were with<br />

high SLI. The percentage of women was the highest in urban areas with high SLI and with medium<br />

SLI in rural areas.<br />

3.2 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Women<br />

Table 3.2 gives percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 years by years of<br />

schooling, according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />

34


Table 3.2 LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF ELIGIBLE WOMEN<br />

Percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 by years of schooling, according to selected background<br />

characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Years of schooling<br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Nonliterate<br />

Literate<br />

but no<br />

schooling<br />

1-5<br />

years<br />

6-8<br />

years<br />

9-10<br />

years<br />

11 or<br />

more<br />

years<br />

Missing<br />

Total<br />

percent<br />

Number<br />

of women<br />

Age group<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

56.4<br />

47.9<br />

52.3<br />

57.8<br />

67.8<br />

69.9<br />

1.6<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

11.4<br />

8.5<br />

4.6<br />

6.0<br />

5.2<br />

7.4<br />

10.8<br />

13.3<br />

10.9<br />

9.1<br />

7.3<br />

6.1<br />

15.6<br />

20.6<br />

17.1<br />

14.2<br />

10.5<br />

8.3<br />

4.2<br />

9.3<br />

15.1<br />

12.8<br />

9.2<br />

8.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

Place of residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

68.7<br />

33.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

5.8<br />

6.2<br />

8.4<br />

10.5<br />

10.7<br />

22.5<br />

6.2<br />

27.8<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

32.0<br />

77.9<br />

15.5<br />

70.2<br />

(61.5)<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

(0.0)<br />

11.1<br />

2.9<br />

7.7<br />

0.7<br />

(7.7)<br />

15.3<br />

5.0<br />

18.5<br />

2.5<br />

(5.1)<br />

21.5<br />

8.2<br />

29.4<br />

15.2<br />

(17.9)<br />

19.9<br />

5.7<br />

28.9<br />

11.0<br />

(7.7)<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

(0.0)<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

(100.0)<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

53.3<br />

78.9<br />

71.6<br />

53.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.7<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

10.4<br />

2.8<br />

4.3<br />

6.2<br />

11.6<br />

3.7<br />

7.8<br />

10.0<br />

13.4<br />

7.9<br />

10.5<br />

15.9<br />

11.1<br />

5.9<br />

5.6<br />

14.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

Husband’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

1-5 years<br />

6-8 years<br />

9-10 years<br />

11 or more years<br />

96.1<br />

60.7<br />

48.9<br />

40.1<br />

19.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.2<br />

25.7<br />

18.7<br />

7.0<br />

1.4<br />

1.0<br />

6.1<br />

20.3<br />

19.6<br />

5.7<br />

1.1<br />

6.1<br />

9.0<br />

27.6<br />

26.8<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

2.9<br />

5.7<br />

47.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

3,519<br />

366<br />

1,097<br />

2,337<br />

1,890<br />

Total<br />

60.2<br />

0.1<br />

5.9<br />

8.9<br />

13.5<br />

11.3<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

10,308<br />

# Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. Note 1: Table includes 1079 missing / do not know<br />

cases on husband’s education who were not shown separately. Note 2: Total includes 22 women with husbands who are literate<br />

but have no schooling were not shown separately.<br />

of non-literate women was the highest (70 percent) in the age group 40-44 years, followed by 68<br />

percent in the age group 35-39 years and the lowest (48 percent) in the age group 20-24 years,<br />

while it was 60 percent in the state. One third of the women in urban areas as against 69 percent<br />

in rural areas were non-literate – 36 percentage points rural-urban differential. The percentage of<br />

non-literate women was the highest (78 percent) for Muslims, followed by 70 percent for Buddhist<br />

and the lowest (15 percent) for Sikhs, while it was 32 percent for Hindus. Further, percentage of nonliterate<br />

women was the highest (79 percent) for scheduled tribe women, followed by 72 percent<br />

for OBC women and the lowest (53 percent) for scheduled caste and other castes women. Only<br />

six percent women had 1-5 years of schooling, nine percent women had 6-8 years of schooling, over<br />

13 percent women had 9-10 years of schooling, while 11 percent of women had schooling for 11 or<br />

more years.<br />

Further, 96 percent of the couples were non-literate and less than one percent of non-literate<br />

men have married women who had schooling for 11 or more years. Similarly, 19 percent of the<br />

men who had schooling for 11 or more years have married non-literate women. On the other hand,<br />

35


47 percent of the couples had studied for 11 or more years. Similarly, 28 percent of the couples had<br />

studied for 9-10 years. However, one-fifth of the couples had studied for 6-8 years and 26<br />

percent of the couples had studied for 1-5 years.<br />

3.3 Background Characteristics of Husbands of Eligible Women<br />

Husbands of eligible women were also interviewed in DLHS-RCH. The response rate for husbands<br />

is relatively low compared to that of eligible women. Table 3.3 gives percent distribution of husbands<br />

of eligible women by selected background characteristics and by residence in Jammu & Kashmir<br />

State. Eighty-six percent of the husbands were in the age group 25-44 years and 12 percent aged 45<br />

years and above, while two percent were below 25 years. Sixty-two percent of the husbands were<br />

Muslims, 33 percent Hindus and three percent Sikh, while about two percent were Christians and<br />

Buddhist. Further, percentage of husbands was the highest (57 percent) for other castes, followed<br />

Table 3.3 BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF MEN<br />

Percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by selected background characteristics, according to residence, Jammu &<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Age group<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45 +<br />

1.8<br />

34.7<br />

51.3<br />

12.2<br />

1.9<br />

35.1<br />

50.9<br />

12.1<br />

1.5<br />

33.2<br />

52.7<br />

12.6<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Christian<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

33.2<br />

62.2<br />

0.3<br />

2.9<br />

1.4<br />

25.9<br />

70.1<br />

0.2<br />

2.4<br />

1.3<br />

56.2<br />

36.8<br />

0.5<br />

4.6<br />

1.9<br />

Caste/tribe<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other #<br />

Don’t know<br />

10.5<br />

13.6<br />

17.0<br />

56.9<br />

2.0<br />

10.1<br />

15.7<br />

19.1<br />

52.4<br />

2.6<br />

11.8<br />

6.7<br />

10.0<br />

71.4<br />

0.0<br />

Education (Years of schooling)<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

Missing<br />

37.1<br />

22.0<br />

40.8<br />

0.2<br />

42.6<br />

22.4<br />

34.9<br />

0.1<br />

19.5<br />

20.8<br />

59.5<br />

0.2<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

20.7<br />

51.5<br />

27.8<br />

26.1<br />

56.4<br />

17.6<br />

3.4<br />

35.9<br />

60.6<br />

Number of living children<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

8.2<br />

15.3<br />

28.5<br />

27.0<br />

21.0<br />

8.1<br />

15.1<br />

26.5<br />

27.2<br />

23.2<br />

8.7<br />

16.1<br />

35.0<br />

26.2<br />

13.9<br />

Number of Men<br />

10,239<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

# Not belonging to a scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward class.<br />

@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are included.<br />

36


y 17 percent OBC and the lowest (10 percent) scheduled caste, while two percent of the<br />

husbands who said don’t know were not sure about their caste. The percentage of husbands was<br />

the highest (over 28 percent) for husbands with two living children, followed by 27 percent for<br />

husbands with three living children and the lowest (15 percent) for husbands with one living<br />

child, while husbands with no living children was eight percent.<br />

The percentage of non-literate husbands was 37 percent as against 41 percent who had<br />

studied for 10 years and above, while 22 percent of the husbands had studied for 0-9 years.<br />

Similarly, 21 percent of the husbands were with low SLI as against 28 percent of the husbands with<br />

high SLI, while over 51 percent of the husbands were with medium SLI. These data have shown that<br />

the proportion of husbands who had studied for 10 years and above was highest (59 percent) in<br />

urban areas and proportion of non-literate husbands was highest (43 percent) in rural areas. Similarly,<br />

proportion of husbands with high SLI was the highest in urban areas and the proportion of husbands<br />

with low and medium SLI was the highest in rural areas.<br />

3.4 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Husbands of Eligible Women<br />

Table 3.4 gives percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by years of schooling and<br />

selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Forty-three percent of the husbands<br />

in rural areas as against over 19 percent of the husbands in urban areas were non-literate, while it<br />

was 37 percent in the state. The percentage of non-literate husband was 31 percent in the age<br />

group below 25 years, 34 percent in the age group 25-34 years and around 39 percent in the age<br />

Table 3.4 LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF MEN<br />

Percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by years of schooling, according to selected background characteristics,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Nonliterate<br />

Literate<br />

but no<br />

schooling<br />

1-5<br />

years<br />

Years of schooling<br />

6-8<br />

years<br />

9-10<br />

years<br />

11 or<br />

more<br />

years<br />

Missing<br />

Total<br />

percent<br />

Number of<br />

men<br />

Age group<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45 +<br />

30.7<br />

33.9<br />

38.8<br />

39.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

4.8<br />

4.0<br />

4.5<br />

5.0<br />

13.7<br />

12.4<br />

12.0<br />

9.5<br />

25.4<br />

26.3<br />

26.0<br />

28.0<br />

24.4<br />

23.1<br />

18.5<br />

17.7<br />

0.9<br />

0.3<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

181<br />

3,549<br />

5,257<br />

1,251<br />

Place of residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

42.6<br />

19.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

4.4<br />

4.1<br />

11.9<br />

11.8<br />

25.6<br />

28.6<br />

15.2<br />

35.7<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

17.9<br />

48.5<br />

16.1<br />

27.6<br />

(39.5)<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

6.8<br />

3.2<br />

3.5<br />

1.7<br />

(2.6)<br />

17.2<br />

9.5<br />

7.4<br />

2.7<br />

(7.9)<br />

32.1<br />

22.3<br />

40.3<br />

37.6<br />

(34.2)<br />

25.7<br />

16.3<br />

32.7<br />

30.4<br />

(15.8)<br />

0.3<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

(100.0)<br />

3,394<br />

6,367<br />

301<br />

146<br />

30<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

35.1<br />

51.4<br />

47.1<br />

31.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

6.9<br />

3.6<br />

3.9<br />

4.3<br />

16.3<br />

8.1<br />

10.3<br />

12.5<br />

22.5<br />

21.7<br />

21.4<br />

29.2<br />

18.7<br />

14.4<br />

17.2<br />

22.9<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,075<br />

1,391<br />

1,736<br />

5,830<br />

Total<br />

37.1<br />

0.1<br />

4.4<br />

11.9<br />

26.3<br />

20.1<br />

0.2<br />

100.0<br />

10,239<br />

# Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. ( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

37


group 35 years and above. The percentage of non-literate husband was the highest (48 percent)<br />

among Muslims, followed by 39 percent among other religious groups and the lowest (16 percent)<br />

among Sikhs, while it was 28 percent for Buddhists. Again, percentage of non-literate husband was<br />

the highest (51 percent) among scheduled caste, followed by 47 percent among OBC and the lowest<br />

(31 percent) among other castes, while it was 35 percent among scheduled castes. Over four<br />

percent of husbands had studied for 1-5 years, 12 percent for 6-8 years and 26 percent for 9-10<br />

years, while 20 percent husbands had studied for 11 or more years of schooling.<br />

The percentage of husband who had studied for 11 or more years was 20 percent in the state-<br />

15 percent in rural areas and 36 percent in urban areas. The percentage of husband who had studied<br />

for 11 or more years was around 23 percent among husbands aged upto 35 years and around 18 percent<br />

among husbands aged 35 years and above. Again, percentage of husband who had studied for 11<br />

or more years was the highest (33 percent) among Sikhs, followed by 30 percent among Buddhist<br />

and the lowest (16 percent) among Muslims and others. The percentage of husband who had studied<br />

for 11 or more years was the highest (23 percent) among other castes, followed by 19 percent<br />

among scheduled caste and the lowest (14 percent) among scheduled tribe.<br />

3.5 Children Ever Born and Surviving<br />

Table 3.5 gives mean children ever born and children surviving by selected background<br />

characteristics of currently married women age 15-44 years in Jammu & Kashmir State. On the<br />

average a woman in the reproductive age group have given birth to 2.5 children – 1.3 male children<br />

and 1.1 female children. The mean children ever born to women were 2.5 children in the state – 2.5<br />

children in rural areas and 2.3 children in urban areas. Further, mean children ever born to women<br />

in the age group 40-44 years was 3.4 in the state, which is close to her completed fertility. On the<br />

average a woman gives birth to 3.4 children comprising of 1.9 male children and 1.5 female<br />

children during her reproductive span of 15 years. Out of the 3.4 mean children ever born to women<br />

in the age group 40-44 years an average of 3.3 children survived.<br />

The data shows that mean children ever born increases with increase in the marital duration.<br />

Mean children ever born was about one child for 0-4 years duration, 1.9 children for 5-9 years<br />

duration and 2.8 children for 10-14 years duration, while it was 3.4 children for 15 or more years<br />

of marital duration. The addition of 1.2 mean children ever born during the 5-9 years duration was<br />

the maximum, which decreases subsequently in each marital duration group.<br />

Mean children ever born to women was the highest (2.7 children) for Muslim women,<br />

followed by 2.5 children for Buddhist women and the lowest (1.8 children) for Sikh women,<br />

while it was 2.2 children for Hindu women. Mean surviving children remain unchanged. The<br />

average children ever born were the highest (2.6 children) for OBC women, followed by 2.5<br />

children for other caste women and the lowest (2.3 children) for scheduled caste and scheduled<br />

tribe women. The mean children ever born was the highest (2.8 children) for non-literate women<br />

and the lowest (1.8 children) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was<br />

2.2 children for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The mean children ever born were 2.6<br />

children for women with low and medium SLI and 2.1 children for women with high SLI.<br />

3.6 Completed Fertility by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 3.6 gives mean children ever born and children surviving of currently married women<br />

38


Table 3.5 CHILDREN EVER BORN AND LIVING<br />

Mean children ever born (CEB) and children surviving (CS) by selected background characteristics of currently married women<br />

aged 15-44 years, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Mean children ever born<br />

Mean children surviving<br />

Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Age group (years)<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

0.1<br />

0.9<br />

1.7<br />

2.5<br />

3.2<br />

3.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

1.4<br />

1.7<br />

1.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.4<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.9<br />

1.7<br />

2.5<br />

3.1<br />

3.3<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

1.3<br />

1.7<br />

1.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.4<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.5<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

Marital duration<br />

0-4<br />

5-9<br />

10-14<br />

15+<br />

0.7<br />

1.9<br />

2.8<br />

3.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

1.3<br />

1.6<br />

0.7<br />

1.9<br />

2.8<br />

3.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

1,577<br />

2,464<br />

2,458<br />

3,810<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

2.5<br />

2.3<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

2.5<br />

2.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

2.2<br />

2.7<br />

1.8<br />

2.5<br />

(3.0)<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

(1.9)<br />

0.9<br />

1.3<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

(1.1)<br />

2.2<br />

2.6<br />

1.8<br />

2.5<br />

(2.9)<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

(1.8)<br />

0.9<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

(1.0)<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

2.3<br />

2.3<br />

2.6<br />

2.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

2.3<br />

2.3<br />

2.6<br />

2.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

2.8<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

2.8<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

2.6<br />

2.6<br />

2.1<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

0.9<br />

2.6<br />

2.6<br />

2.1<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

0.9<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

All women<br />

2.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

2.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

10,308<br />

Note: # Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. Table includes 2 women with missing<br />

information on education who were not shown separately. @ Literate women with no year of schooling are included.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

aged 15-44 years by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. Mean children ever born was the highest<br />

(4.4 children) in Baramula district, followed by 3.9 children in Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama<br />

districts and the lowest (2.7 children) in Doda and Leh districts. Further, mean children ever born<br />

was equal to or higher than that of the state (3.4 children) in Anantnag, Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara,<br />

Rajouri and Udhampur districts and in the remaining seven districts it was lower than that of the<br />

state. In 10 out of 14 districts of the state mean children ever born were three or more children.<br />

Again, mean children ever born and surviving is similar in 10 districts and in the remaining four<br />

districts- Baramula, Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama, difference is marginal, as the state average<br />

also changed marginally.<br />

39


Table 3.6 CHILDREN EVER BORN AND LIVING BY DISTRICT<br />

Mean children ever born (CEB) and children surviving (CS) by district of currently married women aged 15-44, Jammu &<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Mean children ever born<br />

Mean children surviving<br />

Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

3.7<br />

2.8<br />

4.4<br />

2.7<br />

2.8<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

2.2<br />

0.9<br />

1.2<br />

3.7<br />

2.8<br />

4.3<br />

2.7<br />

2.8<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

2.2<br />

0.9<br />

1.2<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

3.8<br />

3.9<br />

3.9<br />

2.7<br />

3.9<br />

1.9<br />

2.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.9<br />

2.0<br />

1.2<br />

2.0<br />

3.8<br />

3.5<br />

3.8<br />

2.7<br />

3.7<br />

1.9<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.9<br />

1.2<br />

1.9<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

3.1<br />

3.6<br />

3.0<br />

3.4<br />

1.9<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.9<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

1.2<br />

1.5<br />

3.1<br />

3.6<br />

3.0<br />

3.4<br />

1.9<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.9<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

1.2<br />

1.5<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

3.4<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

3.3<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

3.7 Birth Order<br />

Table 3.7 gives percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth<br />

order by selected background characteristics of women in Jammu & Kashmir State. This distribution<br />

can be used as a measure of fertility in the absence of formal measures of fertility, such as, crude<br />

birth rate and total fertility rate. The distribution of births by birth order shows that over 35 percent<br />

births were first order birth, 32 percent births of second order birth, 18 percent births third order<br />

birth and the remaining 14 percent births were fourth and higher order birth. In other words, onethird<br />

of the births was third and higher order birth in the state<br />

The percent of third and higher order birth was 32 percent in the state – 35 percent in<br />

rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. The percent of third and higher order birth was the<br />

highest (79 percent) for women aged 35-39 years, followed by over 49 percent for women in the<br />

age group 30-34 years and the lowest (five percent) in the age group 20-24 years, while it was 25<br />

percent in the age group 25-29 years. The percent of third and higher order birth was 21 percent<br />

for Hindu women as against 41 percent for Muslim women, while it was 13 percent for Sikh<br />

women. The percent of third and higher order birth was the highest (45 percent) for OBC women,<br />

followed by 37 percent for scheduled tribe women and the lowest (29 percent) for scheduled<br />

caste and other caste women. Again, percentage of third and higher order birth was the highest<br />

(45 percent) for non-literate women and the lowest (10 percent) for women who had studied for<br />

10 years and above, while it was 29 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The percent<br />

of third and higher order birth was the highest (38 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />

lowest (15 percent) for women with high SLI, while it was 37 percent for women with low SLI.<br />

Figure 3.1 gives Birth order three and above by selected background characteristics.<br />

3.8 Birth Order by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 3.8 gives percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order,<br />

according to district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The third and higher order birth were the highest<br />

40


Table 3.7 BIRTH ORDER<br />

Percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order by selected background characteristics,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Birth order<br />

1 2 3 4+<br />

Total<br />

percent<br />

Number of<br />

births<br />

Age of women<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

65.8<br />

39.0<br />

16.5<br />

3.0<br />

29.3<br />

36.1<br />

34.0<br />

18.3<br />

4.4<br />

19.7<br />

22.4<br />

26.2<br />

0.5<br />

5.2<br />

27.1<br />

52.5<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

465<br />

1,008<br />

596<br />

192<br />

Place of residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

33.2<br />

41.9<br />

31.5<br />

35.0<br />

18.7<br />

14.6<br />

16.6<br />

8.4<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,686<br />

598<br />

Education (Years of schooling)<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

26.8<br />

40.3<br />

48.1<br />

28.2<br />

30.4<br />

41.5<br />

21.6<br />

20.8<br />

8.3<br />

23.5<br />

8.5<br />

2.1<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

1,186<br />

449<br />

649<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

44.5<br />

28.7<br />

49.7<br />

35.0<br />

30.1<br />

37.6<br />

13.9<br />

20.3<br />

12.6<br />

6.7<br />

20.9<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

918<br />

1,281<br />

66<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

43.2<br />

28.5<br />

27.3<br />

35.9<br />

28.1<br />

34.5<br />

27.5<br />

34.7<br />

16.5<br />

21.3<br />

24.4<br />

16.1<br />

12.2<br />

15.6<br />

20.8<br />

13.3<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

323<br />

140<br />

370<br />

1,431<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

30.2<br />

30.8<br />

48.7<br />

32.3<br />

30.8<br />

35.7<br />

18.1<br />

20.4<br />

11.7<br />

19.4<br />

18.0<br />

3.8<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

427<br />

1,245<br />

612<br />

Total<br />

35.5<br />

32.4<br />

17.7<br />

14.4<br />

100.0<br />

2,285<br />

Note: Total includes 1birth with missing information on mother’s education who were not shown separately. Total includes 6<br />

children with mothers belonging to the age group 15-19, 18 with mothers belonging to the age group 40-44, 11 Buddhist and 10<br />

in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

# Total number of births may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases.<br />

(56 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 45 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />

(seven percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of third and higher order birth was higher than<br />

that of the state (32 percent) in Anantnag, Baramula, Kargil, Kathua, Leh and Udhampur districts,<br />

while in the remaining eight districts it was lower than that of the state. Figure 3.2 shows birth order<br />

third and above by district.<br />

3.9 Fertility Preference<br />

Table 3.9 gives percent distribution of currently married women by desire for children, according<br />

to number of living children in Jammu & Kashmir State. Out of the 864 women with no living child,<br />

15 percent were currently pregnant and five percent were using spacing methods. Further, 25 percent<br />

of the women wanted to have children within two years, over four percent women wanted to have<br />

children after two years and 3 percent were undecided about the timing of birth, while 15 percent<br />

of the women wanted to have no more children. The percentage of women who desired to have<br />

additional children decreases with increase in the number of living children. It was the highest<br />

41


Figure 3.1<br />

Birth Order 3 & above by Selected Background Characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-litertate<br />

0-9years@<br />

10 & above<br />

Caste<br />

Schedulde caste<br />

Schedulde tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

10<br />

16<br />

23<br />

29<br />

29<br />

29<br />

32<br />

35<br />

37<br />

38<br />

38<br />

45<br />

45<br />

0 10 20 Percent 30 40 50<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Figure 3.2<br />

Birth Order 3 & above by <strong>District</strong><br />

40+<br />

29%<br />

4 districts<br />


Table 3. 8 BIRTH ORDER BY DISTRICT<br />

Percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order, according to district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Birth order<br />

1 2 3 4+<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

28.4<br />

38.5<br />

19.7<br />

41.2<br />

46.9<br />

26.2<br />

35.4<br />

24.1<br />

36.2<br />

34.6<br />

22.2<br />

15.0<br />

26.6<br />

17.0<br />

14.7<br />

23.2<br />

11.0<br />

29.6<br />

5.6<br />

3.8<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

14.5<br />

33.9<br />

32.9<br />

15.6<br />

31.0<br />

44.9<br />

32.1<br />

38.6<br />

41.6<br />

39.9<br />

22.6<br />

17.8<br />

14.4<br />

36.9<br />

13.7<br />

18.0<br />

16.2<br />

14.1<br />

6.0<br />

15.4<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

57.4<br />

44.8<br />

31.6<br />

33.8<br />

35.8<br />

36.4<br />

40.8<br />

33.2<br />

3.7<br />

10.8<br />

14.1<br />

21.0<br />

3.2<br />

8.0<br />

13.6<br />

12.1<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

35.5<br />

32.4<br />

17.7<br />

14.4<br />

matter’, that is, sex of the child is immaterial. However, 42 percent women said leave it to God.<br />

The percentage of women who said ‘upto God’ increases with increase in parity of the women.<br />

The preferred sex of the additional children was boy for 22 percent women as against only five<br />

percent women desiring girl and over 16 percent women said ‘doesn’t matter’, while 51 percent of<br />

the women said ‘upto God’. Figure 3.3 shows fertility preference of the women.<br />

Figure 3.3<br />

Fertility Preference<br />

Wants no more<br />

11%<br />

Currently pregnant<br />

4%<br />

Other<br />

21%<br />

Currently users<br />

27%<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Sterilized<br />

27%<br />

Wants another,<br />

undecided when<br />

2%<br />

Wants another, after 2<br />

years<br />

2%<br />

Wants another,<br />

within 2 years<br />

6%<br />

3.10 Pregnancy Outcomes<br />

Table 3.10 gives percent distribution of all pregnancies of currently married women aged 15-44<br />

years by their outcomes three years preceding the survey by districts in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />

The percent of pregnancies that ended in live births was 98 percent, over one percent still birth,<br />

less than one percent induced abortions and less than one percent spontaneous abortion. The<br />

percentage of live birth was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (78 percent)<br />

43


Table 3.9 FERTILITY PREFERENCE<br />

Percent distribution of currently married women by desire for children, according to number of living children, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Number of living children<br />

Desire for children<br />

Desire for additional child<br />

Wants another soon 1<br />

Wants another later 2<br />

Want another, undecided when<br />

Undecided<br />

Up to God<br />

Want no more<br />

Sterilized<br />

Currently users 3<br />

Currently pregnant<br />

Declared infecund<br />

Missing<br />

Total percent<br />

25.1<br />

4.5<br />

2.7<br />

4.6<br />

16.6<br />

14.6<br />

2.0<br />

5.4<br />

15.1<br />

5.3<br />

4.0<br />

100.0<br />

0 1 2 3 4+<br />

14.0<br />

4.0<br />

6.5<br />

4.9<br />

8.9<br />

10.8<br />

3.0<br />

37.3<br />

6.4<br />

1.7<br />

2.4<br />

100.0<br />

3.7<br />

1.6<br />

2.5<br />

4.3<br />

11.7<br />

9.1<br />

22.0<br />

38.4<br />

2.9<br />

1.5<br />

2.2<br />

100.0<br />

2.4<br />

1.6<br />

0.6<br />

2.0<br />

11.4<br />

11.2<br />

37.5<br />

28.1<br />

0.9<br />

3.0<br />

1.3<br />

100.0<br />

0.9<br />

1.2<br />

0.2<br />

2.4<br />

15.1<br />

10.7<br />

47.6<br />

14.6<br />

1.0<br />

4.2<br />

1.9<br />

100.0<br />

Total<br />

6.2<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

3.4<br />

12.3<br />

10.7<br />

26.9<br />

27.7<br />

3.5<br />

2.8<br />

2.1<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

864<br />

1,618<br />

2,893<br />

2,741<br />

2,191<br />

10,308<br />

Preferred sex of additional children<br />

Boy<br />

Girl<br />

Doesn’t matter<br />

Upto God<br />

Missing<br />

23.1<br />

0.6<br />

28.1<br />

41.6<br />

6.6<br />

24.6<br />

8.3<br />

19.4<br />

43.7<br />

4.0<br />

24.5<br />

6.6<br />

14.9<br />

48.1<br />

5.9<br />

21.4<br />

4.7<br />

12.5<br />

55.4<br />

6.0<br />

16.6<br />

2.4<br />

6.7<br />

70.1<br />

4.1<br />

22.4<br />

4.9<br />

16.5<br />

50.9<br />

5.3<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

464 622 690 495<br />

438<br />

1<br />

Wants next births within 2 years. 2 Wants to delay next birth for 2 or more years. 3 Other than sterilization.<br />

2,709<br />

in Poonch district. The percentage of stillbirth was the highest (22 percent) in Poonch district,<br />

followed by six percent in Kargil district, and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula,<br />

Leh and Pulwama districts. Pregnancy wastage due to abortions was negligible in all the districts.<br />

Table 3.10 OUTCOMES OF PREGNANCY<br />

Percent distribution of all pregnancies of currently married women aged 15-44 years by their outcomes three year preceding the<br />

survey currently married women, according to districts, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s Live birth Stillbirth Induced abortion Spontaneous abortion Missing Total percent<br />

State-<strong>Rural</strong><br />

State-Urban<br />

State-Total<br />

97.9<br />

98.0<br />

98.0<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.9<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

99.6<br />

98.9<br />

100.0<br />

99.2<br />

95.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.8<br />

1.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.1<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

94.1<br />

97.3<br />

99.0<br />

98.1<br />

99.3<br />

5.9<br />

1.1<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.0<br />

1.9<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

77.9<br />

95.2<br />

93.0<br />

97.3<br />

22.1<br />

2.2<br />

5.6<br />

1.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

44


CHAPTER IV<br />

MATERNAL HEALTH CARE<br />

Provisions of maternal health care services to ensure safe motherhood is one of the major<br />

components of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme. The RCH programme<br />

services for antenatal care, includes at least three antenatal care visits, iron prophylaxis for pregnant and<br />

lactating women, at least one dose of tetanus toxoid vaccine, detection and treatment of anaemia<br />

in mothers, and management and referral of high-risk pregnancies, natal care, that is<br />

encouragement of safe delivery, post-natal care, and management of unwanted pregnancies. In<br />

rural areas, the government delivers reproductive health and other health services through its<br />

network of Sub-centres (SCs), Primary <strong>Health</strong> Centres (PHCs) and other health facilities. In<br />

addition, pregnant women and children can get services from private maternity homes, hospitals,<br />

private practitioners, and in some case non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and trust<br />

hospitals. In urban areas, reproductive health services are available mainly through government or<br />

municipal hospitals, Urban <strong>Health</strong> Posts (UHPs), Urban Family Welfare Centres (UFWCs),<br />

hospitals and nursing homes operated by NGOs, and private nursing and maternity homes.<br />

The <strong>National</strong> Population Policy (NPP), 2000 adopted by the Government of India<br />

(Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, 2000) reiterates the Government’s commitments to the<br />

safe motherhood programme within the wider context of reproductive health. Among the<br />

national socio-demographic goals for 2010 specified by the policy, several goals pertain to safe<br />

motherhood, that 80 percent of all deliveries should take place in institutions by 2010, hundred<br />

percent deliveries should be attended by trained personnel, and the maternal mortality ratio<br />

should be reduced to a level below 100 per 100,000 live births. Empowering women for improved<br />

health and nutrition is one of the 12 strategic themes identified in the policy to be pursued either as<br />

stand-alone programmes or as intersectoral programmes.<br />

In DLHS-RCH Phase-I, to all the eligible women who had their last pregnancy after<br />

January 1, 1999 a separate section on the status of maternal health and utilisation of maternal<br />

health care services was canvassed. In Phase-II, the same section was canvassed to all the<br />

eligible women who had their last pregnancy after January 1, 2001. The women whose last<br />

pregnancy terminated into live/still birth were asked about the details of antenatal, natal and postnatal<br />

care they received; pregnancy, delivery and post-delivery complications they suffered from and<br />

the treatment seeking behaviour in case of complications. Women whose last pregnancy terminated<br />

into abortion, either spontaneous or induced, were asked about the utilisation of safe abortion<br />

services and the post-abortion complications they experienced. This chapter presents information on<br />

antenatal, natal and postnatal care received by women whose last pregnancy had terminated<br />

during the three years preceding the survey as live birth or as stillbirth.<br />

4.1 Antenatal Check-Up<br />

Women who had given a birth during the three years preceding the survey were asked whether they<br />

had gone for antenatal check-up outside the home, and if they had, what type of service provider<br />

had given them the check-up. They were also asked whether any health worker had visited them at<br />

home to provide antenatal check-ups. Table 4.1 gives percentage of women who received any antenatal<br />

check-up during pregnancy by source of antenatal provider, according to selected background


Table 4.1 ANTENATAL CHECK-UP<br />

Percentage of women* who received any antenatal check-up (ANC) during pregnancy by source of antenatal provider, according<br />

to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Age group<br />

20-34 years<br />

35 years & above<br />

Any 1 antenatal<br />

check-up<br />

88.1<br />

84.5<br />

Antenatal<br />

check-up only<br />

at home by<br />

ANM<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Doctor<br />

83.6<br />

80.7<br />

<strong>Health</strong> personnel providing ANC 2<br />

ANM/<br />

Nurse/ LHV<br />

6.3<br />

6.4<br />

Other health<br />

professional Other 3<br />

1.5<br />

1.6<br />

8.5<br />

11.3<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

2,294<br />

295<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

88.7<br />

87.0<br />

88.1<br />

86.2<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

84.7<br />

81.4<br />

84.5<br />

82.3<br />

7.7<br />

6.2<br />

5.9<br />

5.0<br />

1.6<br />

2.0<br />

1.1<br />

1.1<br />

6.6<br />

6.7<br />

12.5<br />

13.0<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

85.6<br />

93.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

80.6<br />

91.4<br />

7.3<br />

3.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.8<br />

9.4<br />

7.3<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 @ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

85.9<br />

86.9<br />

92.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

82.6<br />

80.7<br />

86.7<br />

5.8<br />

7.6<br />

6.7<br />

1.0<br />

2.2<br />

2.4<br />

9.0<br />

13.3<br />

4.9<br />

1,456<br />

514<br />

625<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

84.7<br />

88.9<br />

95.6<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

75.9<br />

87.0<br />

95.4<br />

9.4<br />

5.0<br />

0.3<br />

2.1<br />

1.2<br />

0.3<br />

4.4<br />

11.9<br />

2.5<br />

938<br />

1,566<br />

70<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

82.3<br />

61.7<br />

93.0<br />

89.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

72.8<br />

53.0<br />

90.7<br />

86.1<br />

9.1<br />

14.4<br />

4.5<br />

5.5<br />

1.9<br />

4.1<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

2.3<br />

4.8<br />

12.2<br />

9.7<br />

346<br />

159<br />

487<br />

1,575<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

71.4<br />

90.5<br />

92.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

65.1<br />

86.2<br />

88.9<br />

8.8<br />

6.5<br />

4.3<br />

0.9<br />

1.8<br />

1.5<br />

2.7<br />

12.3<br />

4.9<br />

453<br />

1,517<br />

625<br />

Availability of health facility 4<br />

in the village<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

86.0<br />

85.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

81.5<br />

80.3<br />

8.1<br />

7.1<br />

2.4<br />

1.6<br />

7.6<br />

9.9<br />

448<br />

1,517<br />

Total<br />

87.6<br />

0.0<br />

83.2<br />

6.4<br />

1.5<br />

8.9<br />

2,595<br />

* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total<br />

includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

1<br />

Antenatal check-ups either at home or outside from home at health facility.<br />

2<br />

Antenatal check-ups outside home and percentage add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses<br />

3<br />

Other also includes trained and untrained dai .<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />

included. 4 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village.<br />

characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. About 88 percent of the women received antenatal<br />

check-up during the three years preceding the survey, which is more than RCH Round I (58 percent).<br />

Eighty-three percent of the women received antenatal check-up from the doctor, over six percent<br />

from ANM/Nurse/LHV and over 11 percent from other health professional and others. However,<br />

none of the women received ANC at home. Figure 4.1 shows source of antenatal care.<br />

46


Figure 4.1<br />

Source of Antenatal Care<br />

Any ANC<br />

88<br />

ANC Provider<br />

2<br />

Doctor<br />

83<br />

ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />

6<br />

Other<br />

9<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Note: Based on last live/still<br />

birth, born during three<br />

Percent<br />

years preceding the survey<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Eighty-six percent of the women in rural areas as against 94 percent of the women in<br />

urban areas received antenatal check-up, while it was 88 percent in the state. Further, 88 percent of<br />

the women aged 20-34 years as against over 84 percent women aged 35 years and above received<br />

antenatal check-up. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 85 percent<br />

for Hindu women as against 89 percent for Muslim women and 96 percent for Sikh women.<br />

Similarly, percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 82 percent for scheduled<br />

caste women as against 62 percent for scheduled tribe women and 93 percent for OBC women.<br />

The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 86 percent for non-literate<br />

women as against 87 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 92 percent<br />

for women who had studied for 10 years and above. The percentage of women who received<br />

antenatal check-up was 71 percent for women with low SLI as against over 90 percent for women<br />

with medium SLI and 92 percent for women with high SLI. Further, percentage of women who<br />

received antenatal check-up was around 86 percent for women living in villages irrespective whether<br />

health facility exists in the village or not.<br />

The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was 81<br />

percent in rural and 91 percent in urban areas, while it was 83 percent for the district. Eighty-four<br />

percent of the women aged 20-34 years as against 81 percent of the women aged 35 years and<br />

above received antenatal check-up from the doctor. Eighty-one percent of women who had studied<br />

for 0-9 years as against 87 percent of women who had studied for 10 years and above received<br />

antenatal check-up from the doctor, while it was 83 percent for non-literate women. Seventythree<br />

percent of scheduled caste women as against 53 percent of scheduled tribe women received<br />

antenatal check-up from the doctor, while it was 91 percent for OBC women. The percentage of<br />

women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was 89 percent for women with high<br />

SLI, 65 percent for women with low SLI and 86 percent for women with medium SLI. Only six<br />

percent women received antenatal check-up from ANM/Nurse/LHV in the state.<br />

4.2 Antenatal Check-Ups at <strong>Health</strong> Facility<br />

DLHS-RCH asked women who had a birth during the three years preceding the survey whether<br />

47


women had received antenatal check-up, and if they had, from where they had availed such<br />

services. During pregnancy, women received antenatal check-up from multiple sources such as,<br />

health workers providing ANC at home, Government health facility, private health facility, and<br />

at Indian System of medicine etc. Women who received antenatal check-up both at home and<br />

outside the home are categorised as having received care outside the home. Table 4.2 gives<br />

percentage of women who received antenatal check-up during pregnancy by source and place of<br />

antenatal check-up, according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />

Two-third of the women received antenatal check-up at the Government health facility, including<br />

five percent through primary health centre and three percent through sub-centre, and 16 percent<br />

at a private health facility. Further, about two percent of women received antenatal check-up at<br />

the Government ISM health facility and over four percent at private ISM health facility, while over<br />

one percent women had it from other health facility.<br />

Seventy three percent of the women aged 35 years and above as against 66 percent of the<br />

women aged 20-34 years received antenatal-check-ups at the government health facility. Sixty-six<br />

percent women from rural areas as against 69 percent of women from urban areas availed<br />

government health facilities for antenatal check-up. Sixty-six percent of non-literate women and<br />

women who had studied for 10 years and above received antenatal check-up at Government<br />

health facility, while it was 71 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Sixty-nine<br />

percent of Hindu women as against 66 percent of Muslim women received antenatal check-up<br />

from government health facility, while it was 63 percent for Sikh women.<br />

Fifteen percent women in rural areas as against 19 percent women in urban areas received<br />

antenatal check-up from private health facility, while it was 16 percent for the state. The percentage<br />

of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was 17 percent for women<br />

aged 20-34 years as against nine percent for women aged 35 years and above. The percentage of<br />

women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was the highest (27 percent)<br />

for OBC women, followed by 14 percent for other caste women and the lowest (10 percent) for<br />

scheduled caste women. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private<br />

health facility was 13 percent for Hindus as against 17 percent for Muslims and 24 percent for Sikhs.<br />

The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was the<br />

highest (22 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (13<br />

percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 14 percent for non-literate women.<br />

Similarly, percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was<br />

the highest (21 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (over four percent) for women<br />

with low SLI, while it was 17 percent for women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of women<br />

who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was 17 percent for women living in<br />

villages having no health facility in the village as against 14 percent for women living in villages<br />

having health facility in the village.<br />

4.3 Antenatal Check-Up by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 4.3 gives percent of women who received any antenatal care by source and place of antenatal<br />

check-up by district. The percentage of women who received any antenatal check-up was the highest<br />

(98 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 97 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (55<br />

percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of women who had any antenatal check-up was higher<br />

than that of the state (88 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh,<br />

48


Table 4.2 PLACE OF ANTENATAL CHECK-UP<br />

Percentage of women* who received any antenatal check-ups (ANC) during pregnancy by source and place of antenatal<br />

check-ups, according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Antenatal<br />

check-up<br />

only at<br />

home<br />

Government<br />

2<br />

health<br />

facility<br />

Place of antenatal check-ups 1<br />

Private 3<br />

health<br />

facility PHC SC<br />

Govt.<br />

ISM 4 facility<br />

Private<br />

Other<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Age group<br />

20-34 years<br />

35 years & above<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

66.2<br />

72.9<br />

16.6<br />

9.3<br />

4.9<br />

6.3<br />

2.5<br />

5.3<br />

1.7<br />

2.1<br />

4.5<br />

3.1<br />

1.3<br />

1.6<br />

2,294<br />

295<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

66.1<br />

64.1<br />

68.9<br />

71.6<br />

16.5<br />

19.3<br />

14.2<br />

9.9<br />

4.0<br />

5.2<br />

5.8<br />

5.6<br />

2.6<br />

3.0<br />

2.4<br />

3.6<br />

2.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

6.4<br />

4.7<br />

1.7<br />

2.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.8<br />

0.8<br />

1.0<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

66.1<br />

69.3<br />

14.7<br />

19.3<br />

5.2<br />

4.6<br />

3.5<br />

1.1<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

4.0<br />

5.1<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 @ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

66.2<br />

70.6<br />

65.6<br />

14.1<br />

12.6<br />

22.4<br />

4.6<br />

5.8<br />

5.3<br />

3.0<br />

4.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

3.0<br />

5.4<br />

6.3<br />

1.1<br />

1.5<br />

1.7<br />

1,456<br />

514<br />

625<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

68.6<br />

65.9<br />

62.9<br />

13.3<br />

17.0<br />

23.7<br />

7.7<br />

3.5<br />

0.5<br />

4.4<br />

2.1<br />

0.3<br />

1.9<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

5.9<br />

3.2<br />

11.0<br />

1.9<br />

1.1<br />

0.3<br />

938<br />

1,566<br />

70<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

72.4<br />

55.0<br />

62.6<br />

67.8<br />

9.9<br />

10.9<br />

27.1<br />

14.3<br />

9.6<br />

10.7<br />

1.9<br />

4.6<br />

2.9<br />

13.9<br />

1.3<br />

2.5<br />

1.6<br />

7.1<br />

0.8<br />

1.5<br />

3.7<br />

5.6<br />

3.2<br />

4.6<br />

1.2<br />

4.7<br />

0.8<br />

1.3<br />

346<br />

159<br />

487<br />

1,575<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

61.8<br />

69.1<br />

65.2<br />

4.5<br />

17.1<br />

21.0<br />

5.2<br />

4.9<br />

5.2<br />

6.0<br />

2.8<br />

1.3<br />

1.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

4.1<br />

3.7<br />

5.8<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

0.9<br />

453<br />

1,517<br />

625<br />

Availability of health<br />

facility 5 in the village<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

61.9<br />

67.4<br />

16.7<br />

14.1<br />

8.1<br />

4.3<br />

3.5<br />

3.5<br />

3.1<br />

1.3<br />

2.9<br />

4.4<br />

1.7<br />

1.3<br />

448<br />

1,517<br />

Total<br />

0.0 66.9 15.8 5.0 2.9 1.7 4.3 1.3 2,595<br />

* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />

Note-1: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

Note-2: Total includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />

included. 1 Antenatal check-ups outside home and percentage add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses.<br />

2 Includes subcentre,<br />

primary health centre, community health centre or rural hospital, urban health centre/ urban health post/ urban family<br />

welfare centre, government hospital or dispensary. 3 Includes Private hospital/clinic or non-governmental hospital/ trust<br />

hospital or clinic. 4 Indian system of medicine. 5 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or<br />

referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />

Pulwama and Udhampur districts, while in the remaining five districts it was lower than that of the<br />

state. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was the highest<br />

(97 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 95 percent in Katgil district and the lowest (35 percent)<br />

in Poonch district. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was<br />

higher than that of the state (83 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara,<br />

49


Table 4.3 ANTENATAL CHECK-UP BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of women* who received any antenatal care (ANC), by source and place of antenatal check-ups by district, Jammu &<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Any 1<br />

antenatal<br />

check-up<br />

Antenatal<br />

check-up only<br />

at home by<br />

ANM<br />

<strong>Health</strong> personnel<br />

providing ANC<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/<br />

Nurse<br />

Place of antenatal check-ups<br />

Government 2<br />

Private 3 health<br />

health facility facility<br />

ISM 4 facility<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

89.4<br />

88.9<br />

97.9<br />

56.5<br />

88.8<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

89.2<br />

86.7<br />

97.3<br />

47.7<br />

84.4<br />

3.2<br />

6.1<br />

0.6<br />

15.7<br />

3.1<br />

80.6<br />

76.9<br />

64.7<br />

48.0<br />

76.4<br />

7.4<br />

11.9<br />

32.7<br />

12.4<br />

10.4<br />

4.1<br />

7.8<br />

0.7<br />

4.6<br />

3.9<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

96.9<br />

73.7<br />

92.8<br />

92.0<br />

94.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

94.6<br />

57.2<br />

90.7<br />

92.0<br />

92.4<br />

7.9<br />

18.5<br />

7.4<br />

0.0<br />

5.1<br />

93.3<br />

61.3<br />

6.3<br />

92.0<br />

79.7<br />

5.6<br />

10.2<br />

6.8<br />

0.0<br />

13.6<br />

5.3<br />

5.9<br />

2.7<br />

0.0<br />

1.2<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

54.8<br />

64.2<br />

87.0<br />

89.6<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.0<br />

34.9<br />

37.0<br />

80.9<br />

80.5<br />

16.6<br />

42.3<br />

15.4<br />

11.9<br />

47.4<br />

54.5<br />

69.8<br />

53.0<br />

4.6<br />

35.8<br />

12.2<br />

16.5<br />

3.1<br />

41.1<br />

9.2<br />

5.3<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

87.6<br />

0.0<br />

83.2<br />

6.4<br />

66.9<br />

15.8<br />

4.5<br />

1<br />

* Women who had last live/still birth during three years preceding the survey. Antenatal check-ups either at home or health<br />

facility. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or rural hospital, urban health centre/ urban health<br />

post/ urban family welfare centre, government hospital or dispensary. 3 Includes Private hospital/clinic or non-governmental<br />

hospital/ trust hospital or clinic. 4 Either government or private Indian system of medicine.<br />

Leh and Pulwama districts, while in the remaining six districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />

The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the ANM/Nurse was the highest<br />

(42 percent) in Rajouri district, followed by over 18 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Leh district, while it was over six percent for the state.<br />

The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the government health facility<br />

was the highest (93 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 92 percent in Leh district and the lowest (six<br />

percent) in Kupwara district. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the<br />

government health facility was higher than that of the state (67 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Jammu,<br />

Kargil, Leh, Puwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining seven districts it was lower than<br />

that of the state. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health<br />

facility was the highest (36 percent) in Rajouri district, followed by 33 percent in Baramula district and<br />

the lowest (zero percent) in Leh district, while it was 16 percent for the state. The extent of antenatal<br />

check-up received by women at the ISM health facility was the highest (41 percent) in Rajouri<br />

district, followed by nine percent in Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in Leh district,<br />

while it was over four percent for the state.<br />

4.4 Components of Antenatal Check-up<br />

Women who received any kind of antenatal check-up were asked whether they received each of<br />

the several components of antenatal check-up at least once during their pregnancy. Table 4.4<br />

gives percentage of women who received any antenatal check-up by specific components of antenatal<br />

check-up by residence in Jammu & Kashmir state. Except for X-rays (which are not recommended<br />

as a standard component of antenatal care), all of the measurements and testes are part of essential<br />

50


Table 4.4 COMPONENTS OF ANTENATAL CHECK-UPS<br />

Percentage of women* who received an antenatal check-up by specific components of antenatal check-up, according to<br />

residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Components of antenatal check-ups Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Antenatal measurements/tests<br />

Weight measured<br />

Height measured<br />

Blood pressure checked<br />

Blood tested<br />

Urine tested<br />

Abdomen examined<br />

Internal examined<br />

Breast examined<br />

X-ray<br />

Sonography /ultrasound<br />

Amniocentesis<br />

59.2<br />

22.2<br />

89.0<br />

92.5<br />

89.2<br />

75.1<br />

39.5<br />

26.9<br />

12.2<br />

10.9<br />

9.8<br />

53.5<br />

23.1<br />

90.8<br />

93.4<br />

90.3<br />

76.3<br />

38.5<br />

26.5<br />

13.2<br />

10.5<br />

10.0<br />

75.5<br />

19.7<br />

83.8<br />

89.9<br />

86.0<br />

71.5<br />

42.4<br />

28.0<br />

9.4<br />

11.9<br />

9.4<br />

Antenatal advice<br />

Diet<br />

Danger signs of pregnancy<br />

Delivery care<br />

Breast feeding<br />

New born care<br />

Family planning<br />

83.8<br />

38.4<br />

70.2<br />

50.5<br />

52.9<br />

30.9<br />

83.7<br />

35.1<br />

73.8<br />

53.0<br />

53.3<br />

31.4<br />

84.2<br />

47.8<br />

59.7<br />

43.3<br />

51.9<br />

29.6<br />

Number of women who received<br />

any antenatal check-up<br />

2,274<br />

1,682<br />

592<br />

* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001<br />

obstetric care or are required for monitoring high-risk pregnancies.<br />

Fifty-nine percent women were weighted, 89 percent women had their blood pressure<br />

checked and 75 percent women had abdominal examination as the part of the antenatal check-up.<br />

Other common components of antenatal check-up were blood test (92 percent), urine test (89<br />

percent), height measurement (22 percent), internal examination (39 percent) and breast examination<br />

(27 percent). About 11 percent women had sonography or ultrasound, 12 percent women had X-ray<br />

and 10 percent women reported that they had amniocentesis test.<br />

The type of advice received by women who had antenatal check-up shows that advice on<br />

diet was given to 84 percent women irrespective of the residence. Thirty-eight percent women<br />

received advice on danger signs of pregnancy in the state – 35 percent in rural areas and 48<br />

percent in urban areas. Seventy percent women receive advice on delivery care in the state - 74<br />

percent in rural areas and 60 percent in urban areas. Advice on breastfeeding was given to 50<br />

percent women in the state – 53 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. Advice on<br />

newborn care was given to 53 percent women in the state irrespective of the residence. Advice on<br />

family planning was given to 31 percent women in the state irrespective of the residence.<br />

4.5 Antenatal Care Services<br />

The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme covers all pregnant women should be registered<br />

in the first 12-16 weeks of the pregnancy (Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, 1997).<br />

Accordingly, the first antenatal check-ups should take place at latest during the first trimester of<br />

the pregnancy. It also includes the provision of at least three antenatal care visits, of at least one<br />

tetanus toxoid injection, and supplementary iron in the form of IFA tablets daily for 100 days. To<br />

51


assess whether the women had received all the care during pregnancy, information was collected<br />

regarding number of antenatal visits, timing of the first visit, received tetanus toxoid injection and<br />

supplement iron folic acid tablets.<br />

Table 4.5 gives percent distribution of women who had live/still birth during three years<br />

preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-up, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first<br />

check-up, the number of TT injections received and were IFA tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and<br />

percentage who received full antenatal check-up by selected background characteristics in Jammu<br />

& Kashmir State. The percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits<br />

was 80 percent in the state – 78 percent in rural areas and 88 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />

of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits was 83 percent for women with three<br />

or more children ever born as against around 79 percent for women with two and less children<br />

ever born. The percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits was 72<br />

percent for Hindu women as against 85 percent for Muslim women, while it was 89 percent for<br />

Sikh women. Similarly, percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits<br />

was the highest (85 percent) for OBC women, followed by 84 percent for other caste women and<br />

the lowest (56 percent) for scheduled tribe women, while it was 66 percent for scheduled caste<br />

women.<br />

The percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was the<br />

highest (84 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (74<br />

percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 81 percent for non-literate<br />

women. The percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was 62<br />

percent for women with low SLI as against 84 percent for women with medium and high SLI.<br />

Further, percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was 79 percent for<br />

women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 77 percent for women<br />

living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />

Data on timing of first antenatal check-ups shows that 63 percent women received their<br />

first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy, 23 percent in the second trimester, while<br />

one percent women received their first check-up in the third trimester. The percentage of women<br />

who had first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was the highest (67 percent)<br />

for women having four or more children ever born, followed by 64 percent for women having<br />

one child ever born and the lowest (61 percent) for women having two children ever born. Fiftythree<br />

percent of Hindu women as against 69 percent of Muslim women had first antenatal checkup<br />

in the first trimester, while it was 68 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women who<br />

had first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was the highest (74 percent) for<br />

OBC women, followed by 66 percent for other caste women and the lowest (40 percent) for<br />

scheduled tribe women, while it was 50 percent for scheduled tribe women.<br />

The percentage of women who received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of<br />

pregnancy was 59 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against 66 percent for<br />

women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 63 percent for non-literate women.<br />

The extent of women who received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy<br />

was the highest (69 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (45 percent) for women<br />

with low SLI, while it was 63 percent for women with high SLI. The percentage of women who<br />

received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was 58 percent for women<br />

52


Table 4.5 ANTENATAL CARE<br />

Percent distribution of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-ups, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first checkup,<br />

the number of tetanus toxoid injections received and were given iron folic acid (IFA) tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and percentage who received full antenatal check-ups by<br />

some selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir Statate, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Antenatal care indicators<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence Education Children ever born<br />

Urban<br />

Nonliterate<br />

0-9@<br />

years<br />

10 years &<br />

above 1 2 3 4+<br />

Number of ANC visits<br />

No visit<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Missing<br />

12.1<br />

1.6<br />

5.8<br />

8.9<br />

71.3<br />

0.3<br />

14.0<br />

1.9<br />

5.9<br />

8.8<br />

69.0<br />

0.4<br />

6.0<br />

0.5<br />

5.6<br />

9.2<br />

78.5<br />

0.1<br />

13.9<br />

0.8<br />

4.5<br />

8.6<br />

72.0<br />

0.3<br />

12.7<br />

3.8<br />

8.6<br />

11.5<br />

63.0<br />

0.4<br />

7.4<br />

1.6<br />

6.6<br />

7.4<br />

76.6<br />

0.3<br />

10.9<br />

2.5<br />

6.8<br />

10.5<br />

69.0<br />

0.4<br />

12.5<br />

1.6<br />

7.1<br />

6.4<br />

72.0<br />

0.5<br />

11.9<br />

1.0<br />

4.3<br />

8.3<br />

74.4<br />

0.0<br />

13.8<br />

0.6<br />

2.9<br />

11.5<br />

71.1<br />

0.0<br />

Stage of pregnancy at the time of the first antenatal check-up<br />

No antenatal check-up<br />

First trimester<br />

Second trimester<br />

Third trimester<br />

Missing<br />

12.2<br />

63.2<br />

23.4<br />

0.9<br />

0.3<br />

14.2<br />

61.8<br />

22.5<br />

1.2<br />

0.4<br />

6.0<br />

67.4<br />

26.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

13.9<br />

63.4<br />

22.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.3<br />

12.9<br />

59.4<br />

24.8<br />

2.4<br />

0.4<br />

7.6<br />

65.7<br />

24.9<br />

1.5<br />

0.3<br />

11.0<br />

63.8<br />

23.5<br />

1.3<br />

0.4<br />

12.6<br />

60.7<br />

25.0<br />

1.2<br />

0.5<br />

11.9<br />

63.4<br />

24.0<br />

0.6<br />

0.0<br />

13.8<br />

66.8<br />

19.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Women who received TT<br />

No TT<br />

1<br />

2+<br />

Do not remember/missing<br />

11.7<br />

7.2<br />

73.6<br />

7.5<br />

12.1<br />

6.2<br />

75.2<br />

6.5<br />

10.5<br />

10.5<br />

68.6<br />

10.4<br />

12.5<br />

5.5<br />

76.8<br />

5.2<br />

11.1<br />

10.0<br />

68.8<br />

10.1<br />

10.5<br />

8.9<br />

70.0<br />

10.6<br />

12.3<br />

10.3<br />

69.5<br />

7.9<br />

12.7<br />

5.5<br />

71.8<br />

10.0<br />

8.9<br />

8.1<br />

77.3<br />

5.7<br />

12.1<br />

3.9<br />

80.2<br />

3.7<br />

Women who received IFA tablets/syrup<br />

No IFA/syrup<br />

Received but not consumed<br />

Consumed one IFA per day<br />

23.4<br />

1.8<br />

27.5<br />

26.6<br />

1.3<br />

24.0<br />

13.5<br />

3.7<br />

38.3<br />

24.8<br />

1.3<br />

20.1<br />

24.5<br />

2.2<br />

31.1<br />

19.4<br />

2.7<br />

41.7<br />

24.1<br />

2.3<br />

31.9<br />

24.8<br />

1.0<br />

31.4<br />

17.9<br />

2.8<br />

25.4<br />

26.2<br />

1.4<br />

14.2<br />

Received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup<br />

53.7<br />

52.2<br />

58.1<br />

52.8<br />

56.1<br />

53.9<br />

50.6<br />

52.3<br />

58.1<br />

56.8<br />

Percentage of women who received full 1 antenatal check-ups<br />

44.4<br />

43.9<br />

46.2<br />

45.2<br />

43.8<br />

43.1<br />

39.4<br />

40.3<br />

52.0<br />

52.8<br />

Number of women<br />

2,595<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

1,456<br />

514<br />

625<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />

1<br />

At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and was given adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup.<br />

Continued…<br />

53


Table 4.5 ANTENATAL CARE (contd)<br />

Percent distribution of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-ups, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first check-up, the number of<br />

tetanus toxoid injections received and iron and were given iron folic acid (IFA) tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and percentage who received full antenatal check-ups by some selected background<br />

characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir State, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Availability of health<br />

Religion Caste# Standard of living index facility 2 in the village<br />

Antenatal care indicators<br />

Hindu Muslim Sikh<br />

Scheduled<br />

caste<br />

Scheduled<br />

tribe<br />

Other<br />

backward class<br />

Other Low Medium High No Yes<br />

Number of ANC visits<br />

No visit<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Missing<br />

14.5<br />

2.2<br />

10.7<br />

10.5<br />

61.3<br />

0.8<br />

11.1<br />

1.3<br />

2.8<br />

7.4<br />

77.4<br />

0.0<br />

4.4<br />

0.0<br />

6.7<br />

19.6<br />

69.3<br />

0.0<br />

16.9<br />

1.7<br />

14.1<br />

11.2<br />

55.2<br />

0.7<br />

38.3<br />

1.0<br />

4.4<br />

9.2<br />

47.1<br />

0.0<br />

6.9<br />

3.6<br />

4.5<br />

8.0<br />

76.9<br />

0.0<br />

10.0<br />

1.0<br />

4.6<br />

8.8<br />

75.3<br />

0.3<br />

28.0<br />

1.3<br />

8.3<br />

8.5<br />

53.3<br />

0.6<br />

9.3<br />

1.6<br />

4.8<br />

8.7<br />

75.4<br />

0.2<br />

7.4<br />

1.8<br />

6.4<br />

9.7<br />

74.5<br />

0.2<br />

13.7<br />

0.1<br />

6.6<br />

12.2<br />

67.1<br />

0.3<br />

14.1<br />

2.4<br />

5.7<br />

7.7<br />

69.6<br />

0.4<br />

Stage of pregnancy at the time of the<br />

first antenatal check-up<br />

No antenatal check-up<br />

First trimester<br />

Second trimester<br />

Third trimester<br />

Missing<br />

14.8<br />

53.1<br />

29.9<br />

1.4<br />

0.8<br />

11.1<br />

68.9<br />

19.5<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

4.4<br />

68.4<br />

24.5<br />

2.8<br />

0.0<br />

16.9<br />

49.9<br />

30.1<br />

2.3<br />

0.7<br />

38.3<br />

39.6<br />

20.4<br />

1.7<br />

0.0<br />

7.2<br />

73.7<br />

18.7<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

10.1<br />

66.1<br />

22.9<br />

0.7<br />

0.3<br />

28.0<br />

44.9<br />

25.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

9.5<br />

68.7<br />

21.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

7.4<br />

63.1<br />

27.4<br />

1.9<br />

0.2<br />

14.2<br />

57.8<br />

26.5<br />

1.1<br />

0.3<br />

14.1<br />

63.0<br />

21.3<br />

1.2<br />

0.4<br />

Women who received TT<br />

No TT<br />

1<br />

2+<br />

Do not remember/missing<br />

11.5<br />

14.4<br />

61.1<br />

12.9<br />

12.0<br />

2.9<br />

80.8<br />

4.3<br />

9.5<br />

5.8<br />

78.7<br />

6.1<br />

12.8<br />

14.7<br />

61.7<br />

10.7<br />

31.7<br />

12.8<br />

48.5<br />

7.0<br />

6.7<br />

4.8<br />

83.6<br />

4.9<br />

10.3<br />

5.9<br />

76.6<br />

7.2<br />

22.6<br />

8.1<br />

61.9<br />

7.4<br />

9.2<br />

6.1<br />

79.0<br />

5.7<br />

10.1<br />

9.4<br />

68.8<br />

11.7<br />

13.7<br />

10.8<br />

69.1<br />

6.4<br />

11.7<br />

4.8<br />

76.9<br />

6.5<br />

Women who received IFA tablets/syrup<br />

No IFA/syrup<br />

Received but not consumed<br />

Consumed one IFA per day<br />

25.5<br />

2.8<br />

43.5<br />

22.7<br />

1.4<br />

16.4<br />

16.8<br />

0.0<br />

63.6<br />

28.7<br />

2.8<br />

43.2<br />

44.2<br />

0.6<br />

24.2<br />

15.0<br />

1.2<br />

24.6<br />

23.0<br />

1.8<br />

25.6<br />

45.0<br />

0.2<br />

28.7<br />

19.9<br />

2.0<br />

21.2<br />

16.4<br />

2.7<br />

41.7<br />

29.6<br />

0.9<br />

21.9<br />

25.7<br />

1.4<br />

24.6<br />

Received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup<br />

48.4<br />

56.2<br />

67.5<br />

41.6<br />

34.5<br />

60.3<br />

56.8<br />

31.8<br />

57.7<br />

59.8<br />

56.4<br />

51.0<br />

Percentage of women who received full 1<br />

-antenatal check-ups<br />

34.8<br />

49.9<br />

48.8<br />

28.7<br />

25.5<br />

53.9<br />

47.5<br />

22.3<br />

50.8<br />

44.9<br />

47.6<br />

42.8<br />

Number of women<br />

938<br />

1,566<br />

70<br />

346<br />

159<br />

487<br />

1,575<br />

453<br />

1,517<br />

625<br />

448<br />

1,517<br />

Note: total includes 22 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to don’t know and missing cases.<br />

1<br />

At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and was given adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup.<br />

2<br />

Includes sub-center, primary health center, community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />

54


living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 63 percent for women living<br />

in villages having health facility in the village.<br />

Nutritional deficiencies in women are often exacerbated during pregnancy because of the<br />

additional nutrient requirements of foetal growth; therefore a pregnant woman needs six times<br />

more iron than a non-pregnant woman. The information on receiving iron folic acid tablets/syrup<br />

during pregnancy was also collected. The percentage of women who received IFA supplements was<br />

77 percent in the state – 73 percent in rural areas and 86 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />

women who received IFA supplements was the highest (82 percent) for women having three<br />

children ever born and the lowest (74 percent) for women having four or more children ever<br />

born, while it was 76 percent for women with one child ever born. The percentage of women who<br />

received IFA supplements was 74 percent for Hindu women as against 77 percent for Muslim<br />

women, while it was 83 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women who received IFA<br />

supplements was the highest (85 percent) for OBC women, followed by 77 percent for other caste<br />

women and the lowest (71 percent) for scheduled caste women. The percentage of women who<br />

received IFA supplements was 81 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and above<br />

and around 75 percent for non-literate women and women who had studied for 0-9 years. The<br />

percentage of women who received IFA supplements was the highest (84 percent) for women with<br />

high SLI and the lowest (55 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 80 percent for<br />

women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of women who received IFA supplements was 70<br />

percent women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 74 percent for<br />

women living in villages having health facility in the village. Fifty-four percent women received<br />

100+IFA tablets/syrup in the state - 52 percent in rural areas and 58 percent in urban areas. More<br />

of women with parity three or more than women with parity two or less received 100+IFA<br />

tablets/syrup. More of Muslim women than Hind women had 100+ IFA tablets/syrup. More of<br />

OBC and other caste women than SC/ST women had received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup. The<br />

percentage of women who received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup was 56 percent for women who had<br />

studied for 0-9 years and around 53 percent for non-literate women and women who had studied<br />

for 10 years and above. The percentage of women who received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup was the<br />

highest (60 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (32 percent) for women with low<br />

SLI, while it was 58 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />

For the last live birth or stillbirth during the three years preceding the survey, women<br />

were asked whether they were given tetanus toxoid injection to prevent them and their baby from<br />

getting tetanus. The percentage of women who received one or more tetanus toxoid injection was 81<br />

percent in the state – 81 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />

women who received atleast one tetanus toxoid injection was around 85 percent for women with<br />

three or more children ever born as against 77 percent for women with two children ever born,<br />

while it was 80 percent for women with one child ever born. The coverage of at least one tetanus<br />

toxoid injection was 75 percent for Hindu women as against 84 percent for Muslim and Sikh<br />

women. The coverage of at least one tetanus toxoid injection was the highest (88 percent) for<br />

OBC women, followed by 82 percent for other caste women and the lowest (61 percent) for<br />

schedule tribe women. The percentage of women who received at-least one tetanus toxoid injection<br />

was 82 percent for non-literate women as against 79 percent for literate women.<br />

The percentage of women who received full antenatal care (that is, at-least three antenatal<br />

check-ups, at least one tetanus toxoid injection and supplementary iron in the form of IFA tablets<br />

55


daily for 100 days as recommended by the RCH programme,) was 44 percent in the state – 44<br />

percent in rural areas and 46 percent in urban areas. Around 53 percent women with three or<br />

more children ever born as against around 40 percent women with two or less children ever born<br />

received full antenatal care. Coverage of full antenatal care was 35 percent for Hindu women as<br />

against 50 percent for Muslim women, while it was 49 percent for Sikh women. The percentage<br />

of women who received full antenatal care was the highest (54 percent) for OBC women, followed<br />

by 47 percent for other caste women and the lowest (25 percent) for scheduled tribe women. The<br />

percentage of women who received full antenatal care was 45 percent for non-literate women as<br />

against 43 percent for literate women. The percentage of women who received full antenatal care<br />

was the highest (51 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (22 percent) for women<br />

with low SLI, while it was 45 percent for women with high SLI. Further, percentage of women who<br />

received full antenatal care was 48 percent for women living in villages having no health facility in<br />

the village as against 43 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />

Figure 4.2 shows full antenatal care by background characteristics.<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

Full Antenatal Care by Background Characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 years@<br />

10 & above<br />

Caste<br />

Schedulde Caste<br />

Schedulde Tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of Living<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

22<br />

26<br />

29<br />

44<br />

44<br />

46<br />

45<br />

44<br />

43<br />

48<br />

45<br />

51<br />

54<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Percent<br />

@ Literate mothers with no years of schooling are also included. Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

4.6 Antenatal Care Indicator by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 4.6 gives percentage of women who received different type of antenatal care by district in<br />

Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women who had antenatal check-up in the first<br />

trimester of pregnancy was the highest (93 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 74 percent<br />

in Anantnag district and the lowest (24 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 63 percent for the<br />

state. Further, percentage of women who received three or more antenatal check-up was the highest<br />

(98 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 96 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (33 percent)<br />

56


Table 4.6 ANTENATAL CARE INDICATORS BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of women* who received different type of antenatal care by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Percentage that received<br />

an antenatal check-up in<br />

the first trimester of<br />

pregnancy<br />

Percentage that<br />

received three or<br />

more antenatal<br />

check-ups<br />

Percentage that<br />

received at least<br />

one tetanus<br />

toxoid injection<br />

Percentage that<br />

received<br />

adequate<br />

amount of IFA 1<br />

Percentage<br />

that received<br />

full 2 antenatal<br />

check-ups<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

74.3<br />

56.9<br />

93.2<br />

36.0<br />

63.8<br />

84.2<br />

88.5<br />

97.6<br />

52.7<br />

81.8<br />

98.3<br />

61.4<br />

97.3<br />

51.6<br />

78.7<br />

37.1<br />

35.3<br />

95.5<br />

33.9<br />

64.6<br />

33.0<br />

25.9<br />

93.8<br />

22.6<br />

46.2<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

65.2<br />

29.5<br />

64.3<br />

68.2<br />

60.8<br />

95.8<br />

38.5<br />

91.2<br />

89.6<br />

91.8<br />

93.2<br />

72.6<br />

85.0<br />

87.5<br />

88.4<br />

38.9<br />

7.6<br />

41.7<br />

58.7<br />

44.3<br />

37.6<br />

6.6<br />

32.2<br />

58.7<br />

37.0<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

24.4<br />

41.3<br />

28.8<br />

41.8<br />

33.4<br />

53.8<br />

66.8<br />

81.7<br />

34.4<br />

43.9<br />

39.0<br />

78.3<br />

33.6<br />

49.9<br />

25.9<br />

39.0<br />

9.8<br />

20.0<br />

10.6<br />

29.7<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

63.2<br />

80.2<br />

80.8<br />

53.7<br />

44.4<br />

* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001<br />

1<br />

100 or more iron folic acid tablets including syrup<br />

2<br />

At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and adequate amount of IFA<br />

in Poonch district, while it was 80 percent for the state. The percentage of women who received<br />

at-least one TT injection was the highest (98 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 97<br />

percent in Baramula district and the lowest (34 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 81 percent<br />

for the state. The percentage of women who received adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup was<br />

the highest (95 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 65 percent in Jammu district and the<br />

lowest (eight percent) in Kathua district, while it was 54 percent in the state. Again, The percentage<br />

of women who had full antenatal check-up was the highest (94 percent) in Baramula district,<br />

followed by 59 percent in Leh district and the lowest (seven percent) in Kathua district. The<br />

percentage of women who had full antenatal check-up was the higher than that of the state (44<br />

percent) in Baramula, Jammu and Leh district, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than<br />

that of the state.<br />

4.7 Pregnancy Complications and Treatment<br />

Complications during pregnancy may affect both women’s health and the outcome of the pregnancy<br />

adversely. Early detection of complications during pregnancy and their management are important<br />

components of the safe motherhood programme. Table 4.7 gives percentage of women who had<br />

live/still birth during three years preceding the survey by pregnancy complication and type of<br />

complication during pregnancy by selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir<br />

State. The percentage of women who experienced any pregnancy complication was 40 percent in<br />

the state – 36 percent in rural areas and 52 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who<br />

experienced any pregnancy complication was the highest (42 percent) for women aged 20-24 years,<br />

followed by 40 percent for women aged 25-34 years and the lowest (19 percent) for women aged<br />

40-44 years, while it was 39 percent for women aged 35-39 years. Coverage of such women was<br />

42 percent for women with one child ever born and women with three children ever born and<br />

57


Table 4.7 PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Percentage of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by pregnancy complication and type of complication during pregnancy by some selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir State, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Percentage<br />

of women<br />

with any<br />

pregnancy<br />

complication<br />

Swelling of<br />

hands and<br />

feet<br />

Paleness<br />

Type of pregnancy complication;<br />

Visual<br />

disturbances Bleeding Convulsion<br />

Weak or no<br />

movement<br />

of foetus<br />

Abnormal<br />

position of<br />

foetus<br />

Other<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Age group (years)<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

42.1<br />

40.1<br />

40.4<br />

38.6<br />

(18.8)<br />

32.8<br />

29.4<br />

31.9<br />

29.1<br />

(15.6)<br />

13.9<br />

14.3<br />

7.9<br />

9.7<br />

(3.1)<br />

4.8<br />

3.8<br />

4.6<br />

2.9<br />

(0.0)<br />

13.1<br />

8.9<br />

8.2<br />

7.3<br />

(3.1)<br />

4.3<br />

2.3<br />

1.8<br />

3.3<br />

(0.0)<br />

9.3<br />

10.7<br />

16.5<br />

19.2<br />

(9.4)<br />

8.5<br />

7.7<br />

13.3<br />

14.1<br />

(9.4)<br />

1.6<br />

2.2<br />

0.9<br />

1.6<br />

(0.0)<br />

421<br />

1,131<br />

742<br />

266<br />

29<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

42.3<br />

38.4<br />

41.9<br />

37.1<br />

31.0<br />

26.3<br />

33.7<br />

33.7<br />

16.8<br />

10.6<br />

9.7<br />

7.6<br />

4.2<br />

4.6<br />

3.6<br />

3.5<br />

8.9<br />

10.2<br />

10.1<br />

6.6<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

2.5<br />

2.3<br />

9.5<br />

10.3<br />

16.5<br />

20.4<br />

7.7<br />

8.4<br />

13.6<br />

13.6<br />

2.8<br />

1.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

36.3<br />

52.0<br />

28.5<br />

36.6<br />

10.7<br />

15.1<br />

4.3<br />

3.5<br />

8.4<br />

11.6<br />

1.9<br />

4.6<br />

12.5<br />

14.4<br />

9.8<br />

11.2<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

28.4<br />

39.7<br />

49.4<br />

25.6<br />

31.7<br />

31.0<br />

13.2<br />

9.7<br />

15.9<br />

4.4<br />

4.1<br />

3.7<br />

11.1<br />

8.8<br />

8.7<br />

2.3<br />

2.3<br />

3.4<br />

2.4<br />

16.8<br />

11.4<br />

3.1<br />

13.0<br />

8.1<br />

2.1<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

453<br />

1,517<br />

625<br />

Received any ANC<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

42.9<br />

20.5<br />

32.6<br />

15.8<br />

12.9<br />

4.0<br />

4.5<br />

0.9<br />

9.8<br />

4.6<br />

2.7<br />

1.8<br />

14.4<br />

2.8<br />

11.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.9<br />

2,274<br />

314<br />

Total<br />

40.1<br />

30.5<br />

11.8<br />

4.1<br />

9.1<br />

2.6<br />

13.0<br />

10.1<br />

1.7<br />

2,595<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity who were not shown separately. Total include 6 women in below 20 years of age who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included, 7 cases of missing in ANC received were not shown separately.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases .<br />

58


around 38 percent for women with two children ever born and women with four and more<br />

children ever born. The percentage of women who experienced any pregnancy complication<br />

was the highest (49 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (28 percent) for women<br />

with low SLI, while it was 40 percent for women with medium SLI. The percentage of women<br />

who experienced any pregnancy complication was 43 percent for women living in villages<br />

having health facility in the village as against over 20 percent for women having no health<br />

facility in the village. Main pregnancy complications reported were ‘swelling of hands and feet’<br />

(30 percent),‘paleness’ (12 percent),‘visual disturbances’ (four percent),‘bleeding’ (nine<br />

percent),‘ convulsion’ (three percent),‘weak or no movement of foetus’ (13 percent) and ‘abnormal<br />

position of foetus’ (10 percent). Figure 4.3 shows percentage of women with pregnancy<br />

complication and by symptoms.<br />

Figure 4.3<br />

Percentage of women with Pregnancy Complication and by Symptoms<br />

Any pregnancy complication<br />

40<br />

Swelling of hands and feet<br />

31<br />

Paleness<br />

12<br />

Visual disturbance<br />

4<br />

Bleeding<br />

9<br />

Convulsion<br />

3<br />

Weak or no movement of fetus<br />

13<br />

Abnormal postion of fetus<br />

10<br />

Other<br />

2<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />

Percent<br />

Women who reported at least one pregnancy related complication were asked whether<br />

they had consulted someone or had sought treatment for their problem and also the source of<br />

treatment. Table 4.8 gives percentage of women who had any pregnancy complications,<br />

sought treatment and source of treatment by residence and availability of health services in<br />

the village in the state. The percentage of women who had pregnancy complication and<br />

sought treatment was 81 percent in the state – 84 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in<br />

urban areas. Eighty-eight percent of women living in villages having health facility in the<br />

village as against 83 percent of women living in villages having no health facility sought<br />

treatment of pregnancy complication.<br />

Among the women who sought treatment for pregnancy complications from the government<br />

health facility was over 87 percent including primary health centre (13 percent) and sub-centre<br />

(over one percent), from private health facility (10 percent), from ISM facility (seven percent)<br />

and from other health facility (about two percent). In other words, six percent of the women<br />

sought treatment from more than one facility. Further, among women who sought treatment<br />

from the doctor was (96 percent), from ANM/Nurse/LHV (two percent) and less than one<br />

percent women received treatment from other.<br />

59


Table 4.8 TREATMENT FOR PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Percentage of women* who had any pregnancy complication, sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence<br />

and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Treatment and source<br />

Total<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility 5 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Percentage of women sought treatment who had any<br />

pregnancy complication<br />

81.0<br />

84.1<br />

74.3<br />

87.8<br />

82.9<br />

Number of women<br />

1,<strong>04</strong>0<br />

712<br />

328<br />

169<br />

543<br />

Percentage sought treatment at health facility<br />

Government health facility 1<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

87.5<br />

13.0<br />

1.5<br />

91.5<br />

16.1<br />

1.9<br />

77.6<br />

5.4<br />

0.7<br />

91.6<br />

33.3<br />

0.5<br />

91.5<br />

10.3<br />

2.3<br />

Private health facility 2<br />

10.0<br />

7.4<br />

16.5<br />

7.8<br />

7.2<br />

ISM 3 facility<br />

7.1<br />

4.4<br />

13.6<br />

3.5<br />

4.7<br />

Other<br />

1.6<br />

0.8<br />

3.5<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

Percent distribution of women who obtained<br />

treatment from<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />

Other 4<br />

Missing<br />

95.8<br />

1.7<br />

0.4<br />

2.1<br />

95.2<br />

2.3<br />

0.5<br />

1.9<br />

97.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

2.5<br />

97.1<br />

1.6<br />

0.0<br />

1.4<br />

94.6<br />

2.6<br />

0.7<br />

2.1<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

843<br />

599<br />

244<br />

149<br />

450<br />

1<br />

Include municipal hospital, dispensary, urban health centre/urban health post/urban family welfare centre, community health<br />

centre/rural hospital, primary health centre and sub centre 2 Include private hospital/clinic and non-governmental organization/<br />

trust hospital 3 Either government or private Indian system of medicine 4 Other include Dai trained or untrained, other health<br />

professional and ISM practitioner 5<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital,<br />

government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />

4.8 Delivery Care<br />

4.8.1 Place of Delivery<br />

One of the important thrusts of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme is to encourage<br />

deliveries under proper hygienic conditions under the supervision of trained health professionals. The<br />

provision of delivery services in the government health institutions is one of the components of the<br />

RCH programme. For each live/still birth during three years preceding the survey, women were<br />

asked where (place) their children were born, who assisted during the deliveries in case of home<br />

deliveries, characteristics of delivery, and any problems that occurred during the delivery. Table<br />

4.9 gives percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years<br />

preceding the survey, by place of delivery according to selected background characteristics in the<br />

state. The percentage of institutional deliveries was over 70 percent in the state – 68 percent in<br />

rural areas and 78 percent in urban areas. Further, 56 percent deliveries were conducted at the<br />

government health facility and about 15 percent in private health facility, while 28 percent<br />

deliveries were home deliveries. The percentage of institutional deliveries rose from 44 percent<br />

in Round-I to 70 percent in Round-II.<br />

60


The percentage of institutional birth was 74 percent for women with one child ever born<br />

that decreases with increase in parity to 64 for women with four or more children ever born. The<br />

percentage of institutional deliveries was 57 percent for Hindu women as against 77 percent for<br />

Muslim women, while it was 90 percent for Sikh women. Further, percentage of institutional<br />

deliveries was the highest (77 percent) for OBC women, followed by 73 percent for other caste<br />

women and the lowest (48 percent) for scheduled tribe women. The percentage of institutional<br />

deliveries was the highest (81 percent) for women who had four or more antenatal check-up,<br />

followed by 62 percent for women who had three antenatal check-up and the lowest (24 percent)<br />

for women who had only one antenatal check-up, while it was 29 percent for women who no<br />

antenatal check-up. The percentage of institutional deliveries was 68 percent for normal deliveries<br />

as against 76 percent for assisted deliveries, while it was 98 percent for caesarean deliveries.<br />

Extent of institutional deliveries was 61 percent for women living in villages having no health<br />

facility in the village as against 70 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the<br />

village. The percentage of institutional deliveries was 73-74 percent for women with medium and<br />

high SLI as against 51 percent for women with low SLI. The percentage of institutional<br />

deliveries was the highest (74 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and<br />

the lowest (64 percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 71 percent for nonliterate<br />

women. Figure 4.4 shows place of delivery and assistance during delivery.<br />

Figure 4.4<br />

Place of Delivery and Assistance During Delivery<br />

Place of Delivery<br />

Assistance During Home Delivery<br />

Public<br />

56%<br />

Private<br />

15%<br />

Untraine<br />

d Dai<br />

27%<br />

Relative/<br />

friends<br />

22%<br />

None<br />

1%<br />

Doctor<br />

7%<br />

ANM/<br />

Nurse<br />

2%<br />

Other/<br />

missing<br />

1%<br />

Home<br />

28%<br />

TBA<br />

40%<br />

Note: Percentage may add more than 100.0<br />

due to rounding<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

The percentage of home deliveries was 28 percent in the state – 31 percent in rural areas<br />

and 21 percent in urban areas. The percentage of home deliveries increases with increase in the<br />

parity of women from 24 percent for women having one child ever born to 36 percent for women<br />

with four or more children ever born. The percentage of home deliveries was 35 percent for women<br />

61


Table 4.9 PLACE OF DELIVERY<br />

Percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding the survey, by place of delivery,<br />

according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristics<br />

<strong>Health</strong> institutions<br />

Public Private<br />

Home Other Missing<br />

Total<br />

percent<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Age group (in years)<br />

20-34<br />

35 and above<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

55.3<br />

60.6<br />

58.1<br />

54.8<br />

55.4<br />

54.7<br />

55.0<br />

58.6<br />

56.9<br />

55.1<br />

54.0<br />

46.0<br />

61.0<br />

66.2<br />

15.2<br />

10.2<br />

15.9<br />

16.4<br />

14.4<br />

8.9<br />

13.2<br />

19.3<br />

14.1<br />

9.3<br />

20.3<br />

11.5<br />

16.2<br />

23.7<br />

28.4<br />

28.0<br />

24.5<br />

27.2<br />

29.9<br />

36.0<br />

30.9<br />

20.6<br />

28.2<br />

34.7<br />

23.5<br />

40.3<br />

22.3<br />

10.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.8<br />

0.2<br />

0.6<br />

1.3<br />

1.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

0.9<br />

0.9<br />

0.9<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.9<br />

1.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

2,294<br />

295<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

1,456<br />

514<br />

625<br />

938<br />

1,566<br />

70<br />

Caste#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Number of antenatal checkups<br />

No check-up<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Delivery characteristics<br />

Normal<br />

Caesarean<br />

Assisted<br />

Availability of health facility 1<br />

in the village<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

51.2<br />

43.3<br />

52.0<br />

59.1<br />

47.9<br />

57.2<br />

58.3<br />

27.5<br />

(22.0)<br />

39.2<br />

53.1<br />

62.8<br />

53.6<br />

83.6<br />

61.8<br />

48.3<br />

57.0<br />

7.3<br />

5.2<br />

24.9<br />

14.1<br />

3.2<br />

16.2<br />

19.1<br />

1.8<br />

(2.4)<br />

6.1<br />

9.1<br />

18.4<br />

14.9<br />

14.3<br />

14.3<br />

12.4<br />

13.4<br />

39.9<br />

49.4<br />

23.0<br />

25.8<br />

47.6<br />

25.8<br />

20.8<br />

69.3<br />

(75.6)<br />

53.6<br />

37.8<br />

17.8<br />

30.8<br />

1.1<br />

23.9<br />

38.9<br />

28.5<br />

0.5<br />

2.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

(0.0)<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

0.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

0.7<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

346<br />

159<br />

487<br />

1,575<br />

453<br />

1,517<br />

625<br />

314<br />

41<br />

151<br />

231<br />

1,852<br />

2,279<br />

174<br />

113<br />

448<br />

1,517<br />

Total<br />

55.9<br />

14.6<br />

28.4<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

100.0<br />

2,595<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity, 1 with missing information on education, 7 on number of ANC visits and 30 on<br />

delivery characteristics who were not shown separately. Total includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other<br />

religion who were not shown separately.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />

included. 1 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

who had studied for 0-9 years as against 23 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and<br />

above, while it was 28 percent for non-literate women. The percentage of home deliveries was 49<br />

percent for scheduled tribe women as against 40 percent for scheduled caste women and 23 percent<br />

for OBC women, while it was 26 percent for other caste women. The percentage of home deliveries was<br />

the highest (48 percent) for women with low SLI and the lowest (21 percent) for women with high<br />

62


SLI, while it was 26 percent for women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of home deliveries<br />

was the highest (76 percent) for women who had only one antenatal check-up, followed by 69 percent<br />

for women who had no antenatal and the lowest (18 percent) for women who had four or more<br />

antenatal check-up. The percentage of home deliveries was 39 percent for women living in villages<br />

having no health facility in the village as against 28 percent for women living in villages having<br />

health facility in the village.<br />

4.8.2 Assistance During Home Delivery<br />

Table 4.10 gives percent distribution of women who had given live/still birth during three years<br />

preceding the survey by assistance during home delivery and percentage of safe deliveries by<br />

selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. If more than one type of attendant<br />

assisted during the delivery, then only the most qualified person has been considered. The data<br />

shows that only seven percent home deliveries were attended by a doctor, three percent by ANM/<br />

Nurse/LHV, 40 percent by TBA, 27 percent by untrained dai and 22 percent by relatives/friends<br />

(Figure 4.4). The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was higher<br />

for women aged below 35 years than women aged 35 years and above. The health professionals<br />

attended 47 percent of home deliveries in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />

of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest (60 percent) for women<br />

with one child ever born, followed by 50 for women with three children ever born and the lowest<br />

(44 percent) for women with two children ever born and women four or more ever born children.<br />

The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was 54<br />

percent for Hindu women as against 44 percent for Muslim women. The percentage of home<br />

deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest (54 percent) for OBC women,<br />

followed by 51 percent of scheduled caste women and the lowest (37 percent) for scheduled tribe<br />

women. The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest<br />

(63 percent) for women who had two antenatal check-up, followed by 55 percent for women who<br />

three antenatal check-up and the lowest (44 percent) for women who had no antenatal check up.<br />

Further, percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was 28 percent<br />

for women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 54 percent for<br />

women living in villages having health facility in the village. The percentage of home deliveries<br />

attended by trained health professionals was the highest (57 percent) for women who had studied<br />

for 0-9 years and the lowest (46 percent) for non-literate women, while it was 51 percent for<br />

women who had studied for 10 years and above. Similarly, percentage of home deliveries<br />

attended by trained health professionals was the highest (59 percent) for women with high SLI<br />

and the lowest (45 percent) for women with low SLI, while it 49 percent for women with<br />

medium SLI.<br />

4.8.3 Delivery Assisted by Skilled Persons<br />

The percentage of safe deliveries was 73 percent in the state – 70 percent in rural areas and<br />

82 percent in urban areas. The percentage of safe deliveries was the highest (78 percent) for women<br />

with one child ever born, followed by 74 percent for women with two children ever born and the<br />

lowest (66 percent) for women with four or more children ever born. The percentage of safe<br />

deliveries was 61 percent for Hindu women as against 79 percent for Muslim women. The percentage<br />

of safe deliveries was the highest (78 percent) for OBC women, followed by 76 percent for other caste<br />

63


Table 4.10 ASSISTANCE DURING HOME DELIVERY AND SAFE DELIVERY<br />

Percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding the survey, by assistance during home<br />

delivery, and percentage of safe delivery, according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristics<br />

Doctor<br />

Attendant assisting during home delivery 1<br />

ANM/<br />

Nurse/<br />

LHV TBA Untrained dai<br />

Relative/<br />

friends<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Percentage of<br />

safe 2 delivery<br />

Age group (in years)<br />

20-34<br />

35 and above<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

6.8<br />

6.2<br />

10.2<br />

7.2<br />

4.0<br />

4.3<br />

5.3<br />

13.4<br />

4.7<br />

12.3<br />

5.7<br />

8.6<br />

4.4<br />

2.7<br />

1.5<br />

4.6<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

1.1<br />

1.9<br />

5.8<br />

2.2<br />

2.9<br />

3.5<br />

1.0<br />

4.1<br />

40.5<br />

37.8<br />

45.2<br />

34.3<br />

43.9<br />

38.4<br />

39.5<br />

43.4<br />

38.9<br />

42.0<br />

41.4<br />

44.4<br />

35.2<br />

29.0<br />

12.9<br />

24.1<br />

34.9<br />

28.0<br />

19.6<br />

27.8<br />

25.1<br />

24.7<br />

30.3<br />

31.0<br />

37.1<br />

17.4<br />

19.9<br />

41.0<br />

15.7<br />

21.3<br />

18.9<br />

35.3<br />

25.2<br />

8.1<br />

28.9<br />

10.6<br />

17.7<br />

7.7<br />

38.3<br />

652<br />

83<br />

196<br />

229<br />

155<br />

156<br />

607<br />

130<br />

411<br />

178<br />

147<br />

378<br />

350<br />

73.2<br />

73.0<br />

77.6<br />

73.8<br />

71.7<br />

65.6<br />

70.4<br />

81.8<br />

73.0<br />

69.6<br />

76.5<br />

61.4<br />

79.1<br />

Caste#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Number of antenatal check-ups<br />

No check-up<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Delivery characteristics<br />

Normal<br />

Assisted<br />

4.6<br />

6.5<br />

2.9<br />

8.6<br />

4.9<br />

6.2<br />

11.3<br />

6.1<br />

6.4<br />

1.8<br />

8.3<br />

6.0<br />

(14.7)<br />

1.1<br />

7.7<br />

3.5<br />

1.9<br />

3.0<br />

2.4<br />

2.7<br />

3.2<br />

3.5<br />

2.6<br />

2.0<br />

1.2<br />

(51.5)<br />

45.1<br />

23.1<br />

47.4<br />

39.5<br />

37.4<br />

40.1<br />

44.8<br />

34.4<br />

53.3<br />

50.9<br />

35.7<br />

41.7<br />

(11.8)<br />

41.8<br />

33.7<br />

17.5<br />

24.0<br />

31.8<br />

25.1<br />

26.4<br />

36.4<br />

32.8<br />

27.0<br />

21.1<br />

27.4<br />

(20.6)<br />

7.4<br />

28.9<br />

24.4<br />

25.5<br />

22.8<br />

25.3<br />

12.1<br />

19.5<br />

4.0<br />

17.8<br />

31.0<br />

23.2<br />

(1.5)<br />

138<br />

79<br />

112<br />

406<br />

216<br />

391<br />

130<br />

217<br />

81<br />

087<br />

330<br />

702<br />

27<br />

60.7<br />

55.5<br />

78.4<br />

75.9<br />

54.9<br />

75.7<br />

80.2<br />

35.8<br />

50.6<br />

63.8<br />

83.0<br />

70.7<br />

91.5<br />

Availability of health facility 3 in<br />

the village<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

3.7<br />

5.9<br />

1.7<br />

2.0<br />

22.9<br />

46.1<br />

23.2<br />

29.6<br />

48.4<br />

15.9<br />

174<br />

433<br />

62.8<br />

72.6<br />

Total<br />

6.7<br />

2.6<br />

Note1: Total includes 1 woman with zero parity, and 6 with missing information on delivery characteristics who were not shown<br />

separately.<br />

Note 2: Total includes 2 women below 20 years of age, 7 Sikh women 2 with other religion, 21 having 1 antenatal check-up and 2<br />

having caesarean delivery who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases<br />

1<br />

If the respondent mentioned more than one attendant, only the most qualified attendant is shown<br />

2<br />

Either institutional delivery or home delivery assisted by doctor/ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />

3<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />

dispensary within the village<br />

( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

40.2<br />

women and the lowest (55 percent) for scheduled tribe women. Further, percentage of safe deliveries<br />

was the lowest (36 percent) for women who had no antenatal check up, which increases with increase<br />

27.3<br />

22.2<br />

737<br />

73.1<br />

64


in the number of antenatal check-up and was the highest (83 percent) for four or more antenatal<br />

check-up. The percentage of safe deliveries was 71 percent for normal deliveries as against 91 percent<br />

for assisted deliveries. The percentage of safe deliveries was 63 percent for women living in villages<br />

having no health facility in the village as against 73 percent for women living in villages having<br />

health facility in the village.<br />

The percentage of safe deliveries was 76 percent for women who had studied for 10 years<br />

and above as against 70 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 73 percent for<br />

non-literate women. The percentage of safe deliveries was the highest (80 percent) for women with<br />

high SLI and the lowest (55 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was76 percent for women<br />

with medium SLI. Figure 4.5 shows delivery assisted by skilled person by background characteristics.<br />

Figure 4.5<br />

Delivery Assisted by Skilled Person by Background Characteristic<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 years@<br />

10 & above<br />

Caste<br />

Schedulde caste<br />

Schedulde tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of Living<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

56<br />

55<br />

61<br />

73<br />

70<br />

82<br />

73<br />

70<br />

77<br />

78<br />

76<br />

76<br />

80<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Percent<br />

4.9 Reasons for Not Going to <strong>Health</strong> Institutions for Delivery<br />

Table 4.11 gives percent distribution of women who had given last live/still birth at home during<br />

three years preceding the survey by the main reason for not going to health institution for delivery,<br />

according to residence and availability of health facility in the village in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />

The main reason for not going to health institutions has been presented according to residence and<br />

availability of health facility in the village. One-third of the women stated that it was not<br />

considered necessary to deliver at the health institution. It is surprising to see that a higher<br />

proportion of urban women (39 percent) than rural women (32 percent) felt this way. Further, 42<br />

percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 28 percent of<br />

65


Table 4.11 REASONS FOR NOT GOING TO HEALTH INSTITUTIONS FOR DELIVERY<br />

Percent distribution of women who had given last live/still birth at home during three years preceding the survey by the main<br />

reason for not going to health institution for delivery, according to residence and availability of health facility in the village,<br />

Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Reason<br />

Total<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility 1 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Not Necessary<br />

Not customary<br />

Cost too much<br />

<strong>Health</strong> facility too far/ No transport<br />

Poor quality service<br />

No time to go<br />

Family did not allow<br />

Better care at home<br />

Lack of knowledge<br />

Other<br />

33.5<br />

3.6<br />

3.0<br />

10.7<br />

2.0<br />

4.5<br />

6.3<br />

17.1<br />

1.0<br />

1.7<br />

32.4<br />

3.6<br />

1.7<br />

12.9<br />

2.4<br />

4.1<br />

4.3<br />

16.1<br />

1.2<br />

2.0<br />

39.0<br />

3.6<br />

8.8<br />

0.2<br />

0.3<br />

6.8<br />

15.3<br />

21.7<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

42.3<br />

2.8<br />

1.2<br />

12.2<br />

3.1<br />

2.1<br />

3.5<br />

22.7<br />

2.7<br />

0.0<br />

28.4<br />

3.9<br />

2.0<br />

13.2<br />

2.2<br />

4.8<br />

4.6<br />

13.4<br />

0.6<br />

2.8<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

737<br />

607<br />

130<br />

174<br />

433<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />

dispensary within the village.<br />

women living in villages having health facility in the village said that it was not considered<br />

necessary to deliver at the health facility. Only four percent of the women said that it was not<br />

customary to deliver at the health institution. Other factors reported for not going to health institution<br />

for delivery were, ‘cost too much’ (three percent), ‘health facility too far/no transport’ (11 percent),<br />

‘poor quality service’ (two percent), ‘no time to go’ (over four percent), ‘family did not allow’ (six<br />

percent), ‘better care at home’ (17 percent), and ‘lack of knowledge’ (one percent).<br />

Forty-two percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as<br />

against 28 percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village said that it<br />

was not considered necessary to deliver at the health institution. Similarly, 23 percent women<br />

living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 13 percent women living in<br />

villages having health facility in the village said ‘better care at home’.<br />

4.10 Delivery Characteristics by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 4.12 gives place of delivery, assistance during home delivery and percentage of safe<br />

deliveries by district in the state. The percentage of institutional delivery was the highest (95<br />

percent) in Kargil district, followed by 93 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (23 percent) in<br />

Poonch district. The percentage of institutional delivery was higher than that of the state (70<br />

percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargi, Leh and Srinagar districts, while in the<br />

remaining seven districts it was lower than that of the state. Further, percentage of women who had<br />

delivery at home was the highest (76 percent) in Poonch district, followed by (71 percent) in<br />

Kathua district and the lowest (over four percent) in Kargil district, while it was 28 percent in the state.<br />

The percentage of home deliveries assisted by skilled persons was the highest (52 percent) in<br />

Leh district, followed by 38 percent in Poonch district and the lowest (zero percent) in Baramula<br />

and Kargil districts, while it was nine percent for the state. The percentage of safe deliveries was<br />

the highest (95 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 94 percent in Leh district and the lowest<br />

(30 percent) in Kathua district, while it was 73 percent for the state. In one-half of the districts of<br />

66


Table 4.12 DELIVERY CHARACTERISTICS BY DISTRICT<br />

Place of delivery, assistance during home deliveries, and percentage of safe deliveries by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Percentage of women who<br />

had institutional delivery<br />

81.3<br />

92.9<br />

91.0<br />

34.0<br />

72.7<br />

Percentage of women who<br />

had delivery at home<br />

18.7<br />

7.1<br />

9.0<br />

64.4<br />

26.0<br />

Home delivery assisted<br />

by skilled 1 persons<br />

4.9<br />

(0.0)<br />

0.0<br />

28.4<br />

11.9<br />

Percentage of<br />

safe 2 delivery<br />

82.2<br />

92.9<br />

91.0<br />

52.3<br />

75.8<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

94.6<br />

26.8<br />

63.0<br />

89.6<br />

64.5<br />

4.4<br />

71.0<br />

36.2<br />

7.7<br />

34.9<br />

(0.0)<br />

4.4<br />

5.1<br />

(51.9)<br />

5.3<br />

94.6<br />

29.9<br />

64.9<br />

93.6<br />

66.4<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

23.2<br />

30.2<br />

72.5<br />

50.1<br />

75.8<br />

65.4<br />

24.9<br />

42.3<br />

38.5<br />

7.3<br />

(10.8)<br />

22.2<br />

52.4<br />

35.0<br />

75.2<br />

59.5<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

70.5<br />

*Table includes last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />

1<br />

Includes Doctor/ANM/Nurse. 2 Either institutional delivery or home delivery assisted by skilled person. ( ) Based on less<br />

number of cases.<br />

the state three-fourth or higher percentage of deliveries were conducted by skilled professionals,<br />

while in the remaining one-half districts of the state it was below 75 percent.<br />

4.11 Complications During Delivery<br />

Table 4.13 gives percentage of women who had given last live/still birth during three years<br />

preceding the survey by delivery complication, according to selected characteristics in the state.<br />

The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was 65 percent in the state – 65<br />

percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who had any<br />

delivery complication was 64 percent for women aged 20–34 years as against 73 percent for<br />

women aged 35 years and above. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication<br />

was the highest (71 percent) for women with four or more children ever born, followed by 70<br />

percent for women with three children ever born and the lowest (59 percent) for women with one<br />

child ever born. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was the highest<br />

(71 percent) for women who received four or more antenatal check-up, followed by 60 percent<br />

for women who received three antenatal check-up and the lowest (41 percent) for women who<br />

had no antenatal check-up. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was the<br />

highest (88 percent) for caesarean deliveries and the lowest (35 percent) for assisted deliveries, while<br />

it was 65 percent for normal deliveries. Further, percentage of women who had any delivery<br />

complication was 73 percent for deliveries conducted in government health facilities as against<br />

85 percent for deliveries conducted in private health facilities, while it was 37 percent for home<br />

deliveries. Major problems reported were ‘premature labour’ (31 percent),‘excessive bleeding’<br />

(24 percent),‘prolonged labour’ (29 percent),‘obstructed labour’ (13 percent) and ‘breech presentation’<br />

(six percent), Figure 4.6 shows percentage of women with delivery complication and by symptoms.<br />

28.4<br />

4.12 Post Delivery Complications and Treatment<br />

Table 4.14 gives percentage of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding<br />

9.3<br />

73.1<br />

67


Table 4.13 DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Percentage of women who had given last live/still births during three years preceding the survey by delivery complication, according<br />

to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristics<br />

Any delivery<br />

complication<br />

Premature<br />

labour<br />

Excessive<br />

bleeding<br />

Type of delivery complication;<br />

Prolonged<br />

labour<br />

Obstructed<br />

labour<br />

Breech<br />

presentation<br />

Other<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Age group (in years)<br />

20-34<br />

35 and above<br />

63.6<br />

72.7<br />

30.7<br />

34.5<br />

25.2<br />

19.9<br />

27.0<br />

41.1<br />

13.2<br />

10.6<br />

6.1<br />

6.2<br />

2.6<br />

3.1<br />

2,294<br />

295<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

59.0<br />

63.6<br />

69.8<br />

70.6<br />

32.5<br />

30.3<br />

30.9<br />

30.3<br />

26.5<br />

25.0<br />

23.2<br />

21.6<br />

19.7<br />

24.5<br />

36.3<br />

44.0<br />

14.2<br />

13.6<br />

11.4<br />

10.9<br />

5.5<br />

6.3<br />

5.5<br />

7.7<br />

1.5<br />

3.9<br />

2.2<br />

2.9<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

65.2<br />

62.6<br />

32.6<br />

26.4<br />

24.9<br />

23.3<br />

30.1<br />

23.9<br />

12.6<br />

13.7<br />

6.9<br />

3.7<br />

2.5<br />

3.1<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

Number of antenatal checkups<br />

No check-up<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

40.8<br />

(43.9)<br />

42.8<br />

60.1<br />

71.0<br />

26.0<br />

(31.7)<br />

30.0<br />

41.2<br />

30.7<br />

17.4<br />

(14.6)<br />

20.3<br />

33.6<br />

25.3<br />

12.2<br />

(12.2)<br />

8.4<br />

19.6<br />

34.5<br />

5.3<br />

(4.9)<br />

14.7<br />

18.7<br />

13.6<br />

4.9<br />

(4.9)<br />

5.4<br />

7.2<br />

6.4<br />

2.4<br />

(7.3)<br />

1.2<br />

1.5<br />

2.8<br />

314<br />

41<br />

151<br />

231<br />

1,852<br />

Delivery characteristics<br />

Normal<br />

Caesarean<br />

Assisted<br />

64.9<br />

87.7<br />

35.5<br />

30.9<br />

43.6<br />

21.3<br />

22.8<br />

55.6<br />

18.0<br />

28.0<br />

48.7<br />

15.7<br />

12.2<br />

26.5<br />

8.5<br />

5.6<br />

14.5<br />

5.1<br />

1.7<br />

9.4<br />

12.1<br />

2,279<br />

174<br />

113<br />

Place of delivery<br />

Government sector<br />

Private sector<br />

Home<br />

73.2<br />

85.3<br />

37.4<br />

37.6<br />

22.2<br />

22.7<br />

30.7<br />

19.0<br />

15.4<br />

30.9<br />

53.7<br />

11.4<br />

15.1<br />

15.3<br />

7.5<br />

7.3<br />

3.9<br />

5.0<br />

3.8<br />

0.0<br />

1.8<br />

1,450<br />

380<br />

737<br />

Total<br />

64.6<br />

31.1<br />

24.5<br />

Note1: Total include 2 women with zero parity, 7 with missing information on number of ANC visits, 30 on delivery characteristics and<br />

15 on place of delivery who were not shown separately.<br />

Note2: Total include 6 women below 20 years of age and 14 in other place of delivery who were not shown separately.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

28.6<br />

12.9<br />

6.1<br />

2.7<br />

2,595<br />

Figure 4.6<br />

Percentage of women with Delivery Complication and by Symptoms<br />

Any Delivery complication<br />

56<br />

Premature labor<br />

Excessive bleeding<br />

Prolnged labor<br />

15<br />

15<br />

16<br />

Obstructed labor<br />

32<br />

Breech presentation<br />

Other<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Percent<br />

68


Table 4.14 POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Percentage of women who had given last live/still births during three years preceding the survey by post delivery complication,<br />

according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristics<br />

Age group (in years)<br />

20-34<br />

35 and above<br />

Children ever born<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Delivery<br />

characteristics<br />

Normal<br />

Caesarean<br />

Assisted<br />

Place of delivery<br />

Government sector<br />

Private sector<br />

Home<br />

Assistance during<br />

home delivery<br />

Doctor<br />

TBA<br />

Untrained dai<br />

Relative/friends<br />

Total<br />

Any post<br />

delivery<br />

complication<br />

47.6<br />

45.6<br />

49.3<br />

45.3<br />

47.4<br />

47.4<br />

45.8<br />

51.9<br />

44.9<br />

78.0<br />

47.9<br />

57.0<br />

41.3<br />

31.8<br />

13.6<br />

29.9<br />

30.2<br />

42.9<br />

47.3<br />

High<br />

fever<br />

30.3<br />

31.9<br />

30.0<br />

25.2<br />

33.6<br />

37.7<br />

32.0<br />

25.7<br />

29.6<br />

46.7<br />

26.9<br />

38.7<br />

21.4<br />

19.4<br />

7.0<br />

14.5<br />

14.8<br />

37.8<br />

30.4<br />

Lower<br />

abdominal<br />

pain<br />

31.8<br />

34.3<br />

30.1<br />

29.8<br />

34.2<br />

37.8<br />

32.6<br />

30.5<br />

30.2<br />

59.2<br />

21.8<br />

41.1<br />

24.8<br />

18.3<br />

7.0<br />

14.9<br />

19.2<br />

24.9<br />

32.1<br />

Type of post delivery complication;<br />

Foul smelling<br />

vaginal<br />

discharge<br />

3.9<br />

2.6<br />

3.5<br />

3.6<br />

4.8<br />

3.2<br />

3.6<br />

4.2<br />

2.8<br />

11.2<br />

11.0<br />

5.2<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

0.0<br />

0.8<br />

3.5<br />

0.3<br />

3.7<br />

Excessive<br />

bleeding<br />

Convulsion<br />

Severe<br />

headache<br />

Other<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Note: Total include 2 women with zero parity and 30 women with missing information on delivery characteristics, 15 on place of<br />

delivery, 7 on assistance during home delivery who were not shown separately. Total include 6 women below 20 years of age, 14<br />

in other place of delivery and 19 assisted by ANM/Nurse/LHV during home delivery who were not shown separately.<br />

the survey by post delivery complication, according to selected background characteristics in the<br />

state. The percentage of women who had any post delivery complications was 47 percent in the<br />

state – 46 percent in rural areas and 52 percent in urban areas. Forty-eight percent of the women<br />

aged 20-34 years as against 46 percent women aged 35 years and above had post-delivery<br />

complication. Further, 49 percent of women with one child ever born as against 45 percent<br />

women with two children ever born had post-delivery complication, while it was 47 percent for<br />

women with three or more children ever born. The percentage of women who had any post<br />

delivery complication was the highest (78 percent) for caesarean deliveries and the lowest (45<br />

percent) for normal deliveries, while it was 48 percent for assisted deliveries. The percentage of<br />

women who had any post-delivery complication was 57 percent for deliveries conducted at the<br />

government health facility as against 41 percent for deliveries conducted at the private health<br />

facility, while it was 32 percent for home deliveries. The proportion of post-delivery complication<br />

was 43 percent for deliveries conducted by friends/relatives as against 14 percent for deliveries<br />

conducted by doctors, while it was 30 percent for deliveries conducted by TBA and untrained dai.<br />

13.0<br />

10.2<br />

14.0<br />

11.8<br />

12.4<br />

12.1<br />

11.8<br />

15.1<br />

11.3<br />

28.3<br />

16.8<br />

15.4<br />

14.1<br />

6.8<br />

9.8<br />

5.8<br />

2.2<br />

12.7<br />

12.6<br />

3.0<br />

4.3<br />

3.2<br />

3.4<br />

2.9<br />

3.0<br />

2.7<br />

4.6<br />

1.9<br />

15.2<br />

10.0<br />

4.3<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1.8<br />

0.7<br />

1.7<br />

1.2<br />

3.2<br />

26.3<br />

29.4<br />

23.4<br />

24.8<br />

28.0<br />

34.7<br />

26.1<br />

28.1<br />

26.3<br />

34.9<br />

26.4<br />

31.9<br />

23.9<br />

18.2<br />

6.9<br />

18.0<br />

10.8<br />

32.8<br />

26.6<br />

3.6<br />

3.8<br />

3.9<br />

3.0<br />

3.1<br />

4.7<br />

3.6<br />

3.6<br />

2.9<br />

9.6<br />

9.2<br />

4.3<br />

4.6<br />

1.6<br />

4.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

1.8<br />

3.6<br />

2,294<br />

295<br />

801<br />

842<br />

518<br />

432<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

2,279<br />

174<br />

113<br />

1,450<br />

380<br />

737<br />

Main post-delivery complications were ‘high fever’ (30 percent), ‘lower abdominal pain’ (32<br />

50<br />

296<br />

201<br />

164<br />

2,595<br />

69


percent),‘foul smelling vaginal discharge’ (four percent),‘excessive bleeding’ (13 percent),<br />

‘convulsion’ (three percent) and ‘severe head ache’ (27 percent). Figure 4.7 shows percentage of<br />

women with post-delivery complication and by symptoms.<br />

Figure 4.7<br />

Percentage of women with Post Delivery Complication<br />

and by Symptoms<br />

Any Post Delivery complication<br />

47<br />

High fever<br />

Lower abdominal pain<br />

30<br />

32<br />

Foul smelling vaginal discharge<br />

4<br />

Excessive bleeding<br />

13<br />

Convulsion<br />

3<br />

Severe headache<br />

27<br />

Other<br />

4<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50<br />

Percent<br />

Table 4.15 shows the percentage of women who had last live/still births during three<br />

years preceding the survey and who had any post delivery complication, sought treatment for the<br />

problems and source of treatment according to residence and availability of health facility in the<br />

village. Eighty–three percent of women who had any post delivery complication sought treatment of<br />

their health problem in the state – 84 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas.<br />

Further, percentage of women who had any post delivery complication sought treatment of their<br />

health problem was 81 percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village<br />

as against 86 percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />

The percentage of women who sought treatment of post delivery complications from the<br />

government health facility was 86 percent, including primary health centre (12 percent) and subcentre<br />

(over two percent), over 13 percent from private health facility, five percent from ISM<br />

facility and three percent from other health facilities. However, 16 percent of the women living<br />

in villages having no health facility in the village as against nine percent of the women living in<br />

villages having health facility in the village sought treatment from private health facility. Over six<br />

percent women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against three percent<br />

women living in villages having health facility in the village sought from ISM health facility. In<br />

other words, around seven percent of the women sought treatment of their post delivery complications<br />

from more than one health facility. Further, among women who sought treatment from the doctor<br />

was 95 percent, from ANM/Nurse/LHV four percent, while over one percent women received treatment<br />

from other health professionals.<br />

70


Table 4.15 TREATMENT FOR POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Percentage of women who had last live/still births during three years preceding the survey and who had any post delivery<br />

complication, sought treatment for the problems, and source of treatment according to residence and availability of health<br />

facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Treatment and source<br />

Total<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility 5 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Percentage of women sought treatment who had<br />

any post delivery complication<br />

83.1<br />

84.5<br />

79.1<br />

81.1<br />

85.6<br />

Number of women<br />

1,228<br />

900<br />

327<br />

224<br />

676<br />

Percentage sought treatment at health facility<br />

Government health facility 1<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

86.1<br />

12.0<br />

2.5<br />

87.8<br />

13.8<br />

3.1<br />

81.0<br />

6.7<br />

0.8<br />

83.8<br />

28.6<br />

3.1<br />

89.0<br />

9.2<br />

3.1<br />

Private health facility 2<br />

13.5<br />

11.1<br />

20.5<br />

16.4<br />

9.4<br />

ISM 3 facility<br />

4.7<br />

3.8<br />

7.4<br />

6.5<br />

3.0<br />

Other<br />

3.0<br />

3.7<br />

1.1<br />

6.6<br />

2.7<br />

Percent distribution of women who obtained<br />

treatment from<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />

Other health professionals 4<br />

94.6<br />

4.2<br />

1.2<br />

95.7<br />

2.7<br />

1.6<br />

91.4<br />

8.6<br />

0.0<br />

97.1<br />

0.4<br />

2.5<br />

95.3<br />

3.4<br />

1.3<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

1,020<br />

761<br />

259<br />

182<br />

579<br />

1<br />

Include municipal hospital, dispensary, urban health centre/urban health post/urban family welfare centre, community<br />

health centre/rural hospital, primary health centre and sub centre 2 Include private hospital/clinic and non-governmental<br />

organization/ trust hospital. 3 4<br />

Either government or private Indian system of medicine Other health professionals include<br />

Dai (trained or untrained), relative/friends and ISM practitioner. 5 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community<br />

health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />

4.13 Obstetric Morbidity by <strong>District</strong><br />

The extent of health problems/ complications women suffer during pregnancy, delivery and post<br />

delivery period indicates the state of obstetric morbidity. Table 4.16 gives extent of pregnancy,<br />

delivery and post-delivery complications and treatment seeking behaviour by district in Jammu<br />

& Kashmir State. The percentage of women who had complication during pregnancy was the<br />

highest (58 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 56 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />

(four percent) in Kathua district, while it was 40 percent for the state. The percentage of women<br />

who sought treatment of pregnancy complication was the highest (98 percent) in Baramula district,<br />

followed by 94 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (10 percent) in Kathua district, while it<br />

was 81 percent for the state. The percentage of women who had delivery complication was the highest<br />

(99.7 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 91 percent in Anantnag and Srinagar districts<br />

and the lowest (14 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 65 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />

women who had post delivery complication was the highest (87 percent) in Kargil district,<br />

followed by 82 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (over five percent) in Kathua district,<br />

while it was 47 percent for the state. Further, percentage of women who sought treatment for post<br />

delivery complication was the highest (95 percent) in Kupwara and Pulwama districts, followed by 90<br />

percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district, while it was 83 percent for<br />

the state.<br />

71


Table 4.16 PREGNANCY, DELIVERY AND POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />

Extent of pregnancy, delivery and post delivery complications and treatment seeking behaviour by districts, Jammu &<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Percentage of women 1<br />

Who had<br />

complication<br />

during pregnancy<br />

Sought 2 treatment<br />

for pregnancy<br />

complication<br />

Who had<br />

delivery<br />

complication<br />

Who had post<br />

delivery<br />

complication<br />

Sought 3 treatment for<br />

post delivery<br />

complication<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

56.5<br />

16.9<br />

44.6<br />

34.8<br />

48.8<br />

74.8<br />

(90.4)<br />

98.1<br />

44.2<br />

82.2<br />

90.7<br />

50.9<br />

99.7<br />

44.1<br />

49.7<br />

82.5<br />

20.7<br />

55.4<br />

53.3<br />

44.9<br />

90.4<br />

87.4<br />

84.0<br />

71.4<br />

81.7<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

57.7<br />

3.6<br />

32.3<br />

40.1<br />

35.1<br />

94.2<br />

(76.1)<br />

88.1<br />

(78.9)<br />

89.2<br />

88.3<br />

22.3<br />

42.9<br />

81.9<br />

42.9<br />

86.6<br />

5.4<br />

41.7<br />

64.8<br />

43.7<br />

70.2<br />

(75.0)<br />

95.4<br />

65.9<br />

95.1<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

10.3<br />

19.7<br />

37.7<br />

28.1<br />

(10.1)<br />

(66.5)<br />

(82.8)<br />

75.8<br />

14.3<br />

23.1<br />

90.6<br />

39.3<br />

9.5<br />

39.3<br />

41.1<br />

27.7<br />

(0.0)<br />

67.4<br />

(68.2)<br />

67.3<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

40.1<br />

81.0<br />

64.6<br />

47.3<br />

83.1<br />

1<br />

Women who had last live/still birth during three years preceding the survey. 2 Women who reported at least one<br />

complication of pregnancy. 3 Women who reported at least one post delivery complication. ( ) Based on less number of<br />

cases.<br />

72


Map-3<br />

Percentage of Women Received Three or More Antenatal Check-Up<br />

73


Map 4:<br />

Percentage of Delivery Attended by Skilled Person<br />

74


CHAPTER V<br />

CHILD CARE AND IMMUNIZATION<br />

Child health services under the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme include health<br />

education to mothers on breast-feeding and services for immunization, Vitamin-A supplements<br />

and Iron prophylaxis, treatment of diarrhoea and Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs). The<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) covered all the currently married women whose last<br />

surviving child was born during three years preceding the survey, and information on those<br />

breastfeeding currently and duration of breastfeeding. They were also asked about their awareness of<br />

diarrhoea management and danger signs of pneumonia and practices followed in case of episodes<br />

of diarrhoea and ARI among the children. Data on immunization, administering Vitamin-A<br />

supplements and Iron prophylaxis was collected for the last two living children born after<br />

January 1, 1999/2001. This chapter presents an analysis of the data collected on the above aspects.<br />

5.1 Breastfeeding<br />

Educating mothers on correct breastfeeding practices and child nutrition is one of the components of<br />

the RCH programme. Infant feeding practices have significant effects on the health of both<br />

mothers and children. Mothers are affected through the influences of breastfeeding on the period<br />

of postpartum infertility, and hence on fertility levels and the length of birth intervals. These<br />

effects vary according to the duration and intensity of breastfeeding. Proper infant feeding, starting<br />

from the time of birth, is important for the physical and mental development of the child. Breastfeeding<br />

improves the nutritional status of young children and reduces morbidity and mortality.<br />

Breast milk not only provides important nutrients, but also protects the child against infection.<br />

The timing and type of supplementary foods introduced in an infant’s diet have significant<br />

effects on the child’s nutritional status.<br />

As recommended by the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization (WHO), breastfeeding should be<br />

initiated immediately after birth and should be continued upto a minimum of six months. The<br />

WHO also suggests that the yellowish milk, known as colostrums, should be given to the baby<br />

because it provides protection against certain infections. Afterwards, it has to be supplemented with<br />

other semi-solid and solid foods at the proper time intervals.<br />

Table 5.1 gives percentage of children under age 3 whose mother started breastfeeding<br />

within two hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day of birth, and percentage<br />

whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding by selected<br />

background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Fifty-nine percent children were breastfed<br />

within two hours of birth and 87 percent were breastfed within one day of birth, while 11 percent<br />

children were breastfed after one day of birth. As shown in Figure 5.1, 28 percent children were<br />

breastfed within one day of birth but after two hours of birth, nine percent were breastfed 1-3 days of<br />

birth and one percent after three days, while two percent children were never breastfed. Eighty-eight<br />

percent of children in rural areas as against 83 percent children in urban areas were breastfed<br />

with one day of birth. Over 78 percent of Hindu children as against 93 percent of Muslim children<br />

were breastfed within one day of birth, while it was 94 percent for Sikh children. The percentage<br />

of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (89 percent) for other caste children,<br />

followed by 86 percent for OBC children and the lowest (71 percent) for scheduled tribe children.


Table 5.1 INITIATION OF BREASTFEEDING<br />

Percentage of children under age 3 whose mother started breastfeeding within two hours of births, within one day of birth, and<br />

after one day of birth and percentage whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir , <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Percentage started breastfeeding<br />

Within two hours of<br />

birth<br />

62.5<br />

46.5<br />

Within one<br />

day of birth 1<br />

88.4<br />

82.9<br />

After one day of<br />

birth<br />

10.5<br />

11.8<br />

Percentage whose<br />

mother squeezed first<br />

milk from breast<br />

75.6<br />

63.0<br />

Number<br />

of children<br />

1,492<br />

491<br />

Mother’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

70.5<br />

46.9<br />

42.9<br />

92.2<br />

82.0<br />

80.3<br />

7.0<br />

13.6<br />

16.5<br />

73.0<br />

73.0<br />

71.1<br />

1,064<br />

400<br />

518<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

33.5<br />

76.2<br />

53.1<br />

78.5<br />

92.6<br />

94.0<br />

16.9<br />

6.7<br />

6.0<br />

67.5<br />

76.4<br />

70.0<br />

770<br />

1,141<br />

57<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

36.7<br />

36.6<br />

74.7<br />

60.2<br />

84.3<br />

71.0<br />

86.5<br />

89.0<br />

15.1<br />

22.3<br />

10.6<br />

9.1<br />

72.2<br />

32.1<br />

70.7<br />

76.3<br />

282<br />

105<br />

354<br />

1,225<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

51.5<br />

65.9<br />

47.0<br />

84.1<br />

90.7<br />

80.8<br />

14.2<br />

8.6<br />

13.5<br />

61.0<br />

77.8<br />

68.6<br />

344<br />

1,131<br />

508<br />

Total<br />

58.6<br />

87.0<br />

10.8<br />

72.5<br />

1,983<br />

Note-1: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey. Total includes 1 child with missing<br />

information on mother’s education who were not shown separately. Note-2: Total includes 15 children in other religion who were<br />

not shown separately. 1 Includes children whose mother started breastfeeding within two hours of births. @ Literate mother with no<br />

years of schooling are included. #Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

Figure 5.1<br />

Initiation of Breastfeeding<br />

1-3 days<br />

9%<br />

After 3 days<br />

1%<br />

Never<br />

2%<br />

After 2 hours, but<br />

same day<br />

28%<br />

Within 2 hours<br />

59%<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<br />

Further, percentage of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (92 percent) for<br />

children having non-literate mother and the lowest (80 percent) for children whose mother had<br />

studied for 10 years and above, while it was 82 percent for the children whose mother had studied<br />

for 0-9 years. The percentage of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (91 percent)<br />

76


for children with medium SLI and the lowest (81 percent) for children with high SLI, while it was<br />

84 percent for children with low SLI.<br />

The percentage of children women who squeezed out first breast-milk was 72 percent in the<br />

state – 76 percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. Two-third of Hindu women as against<br />

three-fourth of Muslim women squeezed out first breast-milk and it was 70 percent for Sikh women.<br />

The percentage of women who squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (76 percent) for other<br />

caste women, followed by 72 percent for scheduled caste women and the lowest (32 percent) for<br />

scheduled tribe women, while it was 71 percent for OBC women. The percentage of women who<br />

squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (78 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />

lowest (61 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 69 percent for women with high SLI.<br />

The custom of squeezing the first breast milk before breastfeeding is widely practised in<br />

every community/group. Women who had last live/still births during three years preceding the<br />

survey were asked ‘Are you currently breast-feeding the child? If so, ‘How many months did you<br />

breastfed the child exclusively? The exclusive breastfeeding means breastfeeding the child without<br />

giving him/her anything including water. Table 5.2 gives percentage of children under age 3 years by<br />

exclusive breastfeeding and child’s age in month in the state. Over 58 percent children under four<br />

months of age were exclusively breastfed. The percentage of children exclusively breastfed drops<br />

steadily from 71 percent for children under 2 months of age to 51 percent for children aged 6-7<br />

months, while 88 percent of the children below six months were breastfed exclusively for four months.<br />

Further, 63 percent of the children aged below four months were breastfed exclusively. The percentage<br />

of children aged 4-6 months who received exclusive breastfeeding was 48 percent, while 91 percent of<br />

them were breastfed exclusively for at least four months. Similarly, percentage of children aged 7-9<br />

months who received exclusive breastfeeding was 32 percent, while 96 percent children received<br />

exclusive breastfeeding for at least four months and 77 percent for at least six months.<br />

Table 5.2 EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING BY CHILD’S AGE<br />

Percentage of children under age 3 years by exclusive breastfeeding and child’s age in month, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Age in months<br />

Below 2<br />

2-3<br />

4-5<br />

6-7<br />

8-9<br />

10-11<br />

12-13<br />

14-15<br />

16-17<br />

18-19<br />

20-21<br />

22-23<br />

24-25<br />

26-27<br />

28-29<br />

30-31<br />

32-33<br />

34-35<br />

Status of exclusive breastfeeding<br />

Exclusive breastfeeding At least 4 months At least 6 months<br />

71.1<br />

58.5<br />

45.6<br />

51.0<br />

23.4<br />

23.1<br />

25.1<br />

25.4<br />

22.6<br />

9.9<br />

9.9<br />

17.1<br />

12.8<br />

14.3<br />

6.8<br />

11.3<br />

7.4<br />

(7.3)<br />

*<br />

*<br />

88.3<br />

97.4<br />

96.0<br />

88.1<br />

90.3<br />

89.3<br />

95.3<br />

92.3<br />

88.6<br />

81.6<br />

81.7<br />

94.2<br />

98.8<br />

96.4<br />

90.0<br />

(80.0)<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

77.2<br />

76.3<br />

57.9<br />

68.5<br />

70.6<br />

74.6<br />

72.4<br />

58.6<br />

56.6<br />

65.4<br />

71.4<br />

81.2<br />

80.6<br />

74.4<br />

(58.2)<br />

Number of<br />

children<br />

64<br />

119<br />

127<br />

103<br />

102<br />

70<br />

110<br />

152<br />

95<br />

120<br />

62<br />

71<br />

91<br />

162<br />

202<br />

200<br />

84<br />

48<br />

Below 4 months<br />

4-6 months<br />

7-9 Months<br />

62.9<br />

47.6<br />

32.3<br />

Note: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

*<br />

91.5<br />

95.7<br />

*<br />

*<br />

77.3<br />

182<br />

176<br />

156<br />

77


5.1.1 Breastfeeding by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 5.3 gives percentage of children under age 3 years who started breastfeeding within two<br />

hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day of birth, percentage whose mother<br />

squeezed the first breast-milk before breastfeeding and percentage of children who were<br />

exclusively breastfed by district in the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed within<br />

two hours of birth was the highest (97 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts, followed by<br />

72 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (eight percent) in Udhampur district, while it was 59<br />

percent for the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed within one day of birth was<br />

the highest (98 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts, followed by 92 percent in Badgam,<br />

Kargil, Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (39 percent) in Poonch district, while it<br />

was 87 percent for the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed after one day of birth<br />

was the highest (61 percent) in Poonch district, followed by 48 percent in Leh district and the lowest<br />

(two percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 11 percent for the state.<br />

The percentage of children whose mother squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (100<br />

percent) in Baramula district, followed by 96 percent in Kupwara district and the lowest (three<br />

percent) in Doda district, while it was 72 percent for the state. The percentage of children who<br />

received exclusive breastfeeding was the highest (100 percent) in Srinagar and Baramula<br />

districts, followed by 99 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (17 percent) in Doda district,<br />

while it was 72 percent for the state.<br />

Table 5.3 BREASTFEEDING BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of children under age 3 who started breastfeeding within two hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day<br />

of birth, percentage whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding and percentage of children who<br />

exclusively breastfeed by <strong>District</strong>, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Within two hours of<br />

birth<br />

Percentage started breastfeeding<br />

Within one day<br />

of birth 1<br />

After one day<br />

of birth<br />

Percentage whose<br />

mother squeezed first<br />

milk from breast<br />

Exclusive<br />

breastfeeding 2<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

97.5<br />

71.8<br />

97.2<br />

37.5<br />

52.8<br />

98.1<br />

91.5<br />

97.6<br />

71.7<br />

88.3<br />

1.9<br />

8.5<br />

2.4<br />

18.3<br />

8.0<br />

59.5<br />

55.6<br />

100.0<br />

2.9<br />

78.5<br />

86.5<br />

99.3<br />

99.7<br />

16.8<br />

43.2<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

52.7<br />

9.7<br />

34.2<br />

16.5<br />

35.9<br />

92.3<br />

71.7<br />

91.7<br />

52.4<br />

92.2<br />

7.7<br />

27.5<br />

7.7<br />

47.6<br />

7.3<br />

67.8<br />

64.2<br />

96.2<br />

43.4<br />

94.7<br />

87.3<br />

46.6<br />

88.2<br />

85.2<br />

87.0<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

17.3<br />

21.6<br />

43.1<br />

8.2<br />

38.9<br />

62.4<br />

78.7<br />

70.9<br />

61.1<br />

35.5<br />

21.3<br />

20.5<br />

59.5<br />

54.9<br />

84.8<br />

52.6<br />

97.4<br />

85.4<br />

100.0<br />

41.1<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

58.6<br />

87.0<br />

Note: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey<br />

1<br />

Includes children who started breastfeeding within two hours of births. 2 Based on youngest children age 6 months and older at<br />

the time of survey and breastfeed exclusively 6 months or more as mother reported.<br />

10.8<br />

72.5<br />

72.0<br />

5.2 Immunization of Children<br />

The immunization of children against six serious but preventable diseases namely, tuberculosis,<br />

78


diphtheria, pertusis, poliomyelitis and measles is the main component of the child survival<br />

programme. As part of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Policy, the <strong>National</strong> Immunization Programme is<br />

being implemented on a priority basis. The Government of India initiated the Expanded Programme on<br />

Immunization (EPI) in 1978 with the objective of reducing morbidity, mortality and disabilities among<br />

children from six diseases.<br />

The Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) was introduced in 1985-86 with the<br />

objective of covering at least 85 percent of all infants against the six vaccine preventable diseases<br />

by 1990. This scheme has been introduced in every district of the country. The standard immunization<br />

schedule developed for the child immunization programme specifies the age at which each<br />

vaccine should be administrated and the number of doses to be given. Routine vaccinations received<br />

by infants and children are usually recorded on a vaccination card that is issued for the child.<br />

In the first phase of Round-II, all the women with last and last but one living child born<br />

after January 1, 1999 were asked whether the child/children had received the vaccination against<br />

polio, tuberculosis (BCG), diphtheria, whooping cough (pertusis), tetanus (DPT) and measles,<br />

and for the second phase, the reference period was from January 1, 2001. For Polio and DPT,<br />

further information on polio at birth and number of doses was asked. Children who received<br />

BCG, three doses of DPT and polio (excluding polio 0) and measles are considered to be fully<br />

vaccinated. Information on the source of immunization for last dose and in case where immunization<br />

was not given, the reason for not giving immunization was also compiled.<br />

Table 5.4 gives percentage of children age 12-23 months who received vaccination<br />

according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The data shows that<br />

only 32 percent children were fully immunised and three percent children did not at all received<br />

any vaccination. In other words, 65 percent of the children were partially immunised in the state.<br />

The percentage of children who were protected against all the six killer diseases shows that BCG<br />

vaccination was given to over 91 percent children, while 78 percent children received Measles<br />

vaccine in the state. Only 40 percent of the children received three doses of DPT vaccine, while<br />

42 percent of the children received three doses of Polio vaccine in the state. Coverage of each<br />

vaccination including Polio-0 is much higher than the percentage fully vaccinated. The first dose<br />

of DPT vaccine was 74 percent, while its third dose was 40 percent-decline of 34 percent points.<br />

Similarly, first dose of Polio vaccine was 78 percent, while its third dose was 42 percent - decline<br />

of 36 percent points. Further, first dose of DPT and Polio, and Measles are quite close. Figure 5.2<br />

shows percent of children age 12-23 months who have received specific vaccination in the state.<br />

There has been some decline in full vaccination coverage in Jammu & Kashmir State<br />

from over 50 percent in Round-I in 1998-99. These data indicate that despite the progress that<br />

has been made in immunization coverage for children in the state, coverage levels are still low<br />

and a large proportion of children who received some early vaccinations dropped out of the<br />

programme before receiving all of the recommended vaccinations.<br />

The data indicates that the coverage of each type of vaccine except Measles was more in<br />

urban areas than in rural areas. Thirty percent of the children in rural areas as against 37 percent<br />

in urban areas received full immunisation. Eighty-six percent of the children received polio-0 vaccine<br />

at the time of birth in the state irrespective of place of residence. Ninety percent children in rural<br />

areas as against 94 percent children in urban areas received BCG vaccination. Ninety percent male<br />

79


Table 5.4 VACCINATION OF CHILDREN<br />

Percentage of children age 12-23 months who received vaccination according to some selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic Polio 0 BCG<br />

DPT Polio<br />

1 2 3 1 2 3<br />

Measles<br />

Full 1<br />

vaccination<br />

No<br />

vaccination<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Sex of the child<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Birth order<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Mother’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

85.9<br />

85.5<br />

83.8<br />

88.1<br />

82.9<br />

89.5<br />

83.5<br />

87.9<br />

81.9<br />

87.4<br />

90.8<br />

85.0<br />

86.5<br />

84.0<br />

(72.9)<br />

88.2<br />

87.4<br />

73.8<br />

87.9<br />

88.1<br />

90.4<br />

94.2<br />

89.6<br />

93.6<br />

89.2<br />

91.9<br />

98.6<br />

90.5<br />

89.9<br />

89.3<br />

95.6<br />

91.6<br />

91.5<br />

86.4<br />

(84.7)<br />

92.0<br />

93.5<br />

76.1<br />

94.5<br />

93.8<br />

72.5<br />

79.3<br />

74.6<br />

74.2<br />

70.5<br />

76.6<br />

81.1<br />

74.9<br />

67.9<br />

78.3<br />

82.0<br />

74.7<br />

73.9<br />

71.8<br />

(50.8)<br />

78.5<br />

77.8<br />

50.3<br />

76.4<br />

83.7<br />

59.5<br />

68.1<br />

61.0<br />

63.0<br />

59.5<br />

61.2<br />

67.8<br />

64.9<br />

53.8<br />

67.7<br />

70.5<br />

62.4<br />

60.5<br />

59.4<br />

(42.4)<br />

63.4<br />

65.7<br />

36.2<br />

64.4<br />

70.9<br />

36.1<br />

50.2<br />

41.2<br />

39.0<br />

37.2<br />

39.2<br />

41.1<br />

49.0<br />

34.1<br />

37.6<br />

51.7<br />

44.8<br />

33.4<br />

48.5<br />

(23.7)<br />

43.1<br />

39.0<br />

21.7<br />

40.7<br />

49.0<br />

77.7<br />

78.3<br />

78.3<br />

77.3<br />

74.9<br />

79.1<br />

86.9<br />

75.4<br />

73.7<br />

82.5<br />

81.0<br />

78.2<br />

77.5<br />

82.0<br />

(40.7)<br />

79.1<br />

79.2<br />

47.3<br />

83.7<br />

82.9<br />

72.6<br />

64.3<br />

71.2<br />

69.1<br />

65.4<br />

72.7<br />

82.0<br />

67.8<br />

66.3<br />

78.9<br />

69.9<br />

70.5<br />

70.5<br />

71.7<br />

(35.6)<br />

68.8<br />

72.5<br />

42.4<br />

77.9<br />

70.2<br />

41.3<br />

42.9<br />

43.4<br />

39.7<br />

38.0<br />

43.3<br />

46.9<br />

44.0<br />

39.2<br />

39.8<br />

47.2<br />

46.5<br />

35.9<br />

47.7<br />

(25.4)<br />

41.0<br />

42.3<br />

27.0<br />

42.4<br />

48.3<br />

79.4<br />

74.0<br />

77.8<br />

78.0<br />

75.0<br />

74.4<br />

89.4<br />

82.9<br />

80.2<br />

78.4<br />

73.8<br />

74.7<br />

81.0<br />

76.2<br />

(74.6)<br />

84.0<br />

77.2<br />

60.7<br />

84.7<br />

73.7<br />

30.0<br />

36.9<br />

32.6<br />

31.3<br />

28.1<br />

33.4<br />

34.7<br />

37.0<br />

26.5<br />

30.6<br />

41.8<br />

37.8<br />

24.7<br />

37.0<br />

(13.6)<br />

31.0<br />

32.5<br />

12.1<br />

33.6<br />

39.6<br />

2.5<br />

2.8<br />

4.1<br />

0.8<br />

2.8<br />

3.6<br />

0.5<br />

1.9<br />

3.5<br />

2.7<br />

1.0<br />

2.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.6<br />

(3.4)<br />

2.6<br />

2.4<br />

9.4<br />

0.4<br />

3.2<br />

461<br />

183<br />

348<br />

297<br />

260<br />

203<br />

83<br />

98<br />

307<br />

145<br />

193<br />

320<br />

308<br />

116<br />

33<br />

102<br />

385<br />

99<br />

360<br />

185<br />

Total<br />

85.8<br />

91.5<br />

74.4<br />

61.9<br />

40.2<br />

77.9<br />

70.2<br />

41.7<br />

77.9<br />

32.0<br />

2.6<br />

644<br />

Note-1: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001. Note-2: Total includes 16 children with other religion who were not shown separately. @<br />

Literate mothers with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not and missing cases.<br />

1<br />

BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

80


81<br />

Figure 5.2<br />

Percentage of Chidren Age 12-23 months<br />

who have Received Specific Vaccinations<br />

BCG<br />

92<br />

DPT1<br />

DPT2<br />

DPT3<br />

40<br />

62<br />

74<br />

Polio1<br />

Polio2<br />

Polio3<br />

42<br />

70<br />

78<br />

Measles<br />

78<br />

All<br />

None<br />

3<br />

32<br />

=<br />

0 19 38 57 76 95<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percent<br />

children as against 94 percent female children received BCG vaccination. The percentage of children<br />

who received BCG vaccination was the highest (99 percent) for third order birth, followed by<br />

92 percent for second order birth and the lowest (83 percent) for first order birth. The percentage<br />

of children who received BCG vaccination was the highest (93 percent) for other caste children,<br />

followed by 92 percent for OBC children and the lowest (85 percent) for scheduled tribe children.<br />

Ninety-six percent of children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above as against over 89<br />

percent of children having non-literate mother and children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years<br />

had BCG vaccination. Seventy-six percent of children with low SLI as against 94 percent children<br />

with medium and high SLI had BCG vaccination.<br />

The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was 40 percent in<br />

the state - 36 percent in rural areas and 50 percent in urban areas. Forty-one percent of male<br />

children as against 39 percent of female children received three doses of DPT vaccine. The<br />

percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest (49 percent) for<br />

fourth or higher order births, followed by 41 percent for third order births and the lowest (37<br />

percent) for first order births. Forty-five percent of Hindu children as against 33 percent of Muslim<br />

children received three doses of DPT vaccine. The percentage of children who received three doses of<br />

DPT vaccine were the highest (48 percent) for scheduled caste children, followed by 43 percent for<br />

OBC children and the lowest (24 percent) for scheduled tribe children.<br />

The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest (52<br />

percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (34 percent)<br />

for children having non-literate mother, while it was 38 percent for children whose mother had<br />

studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine<br />

as the highest (49 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest (22 percent) for children<br />

with low SLI, while it was 41 percent for children with medium SLI.


82<br />

The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was 42 percent in the<br />

state – 41 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. Forty-three percent of male children<br />

as against 40 percent of female children received three doses of Polio vaccine. Further, percentage<br />

of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (47 percent) for third order<br />

births, followed by 44 percent for four or higher order births and the lowest (38 percent) for first<br />

order births. Over 46 percent of Hindu children as against 36 percent of Muslim children received<br />

three doses of Polio vaccine. The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine<br />

was the highest (48 percent) for scheduled caste children, followed by 42 percent for other caste<br />

children and the lowest (25 percent) for scheduled tribe children. The percentage of children who<br />

received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (47 percent) for children whose mother had<br />

studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (39 percent) for children having non-literate<br />

mother, while it was 40 percent for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />

percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (48 percent) for<br />

children with high SLI and the lowest (27 percent) for children with low SLI, while it was 42<br />

percent for children with medium SLI.<br />

The percentage of children who received three doses of Measles vaccine was 78 percent in<br />

the state – 79 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in urban areas. Seventy-eight percent of the<br />

children received Measles vaccine in the state irrespective of sex. The percentage of children who<br />

received Measles vaccine was the highest (89 percent) for third order births, followed by 83<br />

percent for fourth or higher order births and the lowest (74 percent) for second order births. Seventyfive<br />

percent of Hindu children as against 81 percent of Muslim children received Measles vaccine. The<br />

percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (84 percent) for OBC children,<br />

followed by 77 percent for other caste children and the lowest (75 percent) for scheduled tribe<br />

children. The percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (80 percent)<br />

for children having non-literate mother and the lowest (74 percent) for children whose mother had<br />

studied for 10 years and above, while it was 78 percent for children whose mother had studied for<br />

0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (85<br />

percent) for children with medium SLI and the lowest (61 percent) for children with low SLI,<br />

while it was 74 percent for children with high SLI.<br />

The percentage of children who received full vaccination was 32 percent in the state – 30<br />

percent in rural areas and 37 percent in urban areas. Thirty-three percent of male children as against<br />

31 percent of female children received full vaccination in the state. The percentage of children<br />

who received full vaccination was the highest (37 percent) for fourth or higher order births, followed<br />

by 35 percent for third order births and the lowest (28 percent) for first order births. Thirty-eight<br />

percent of Hindu children as against 25 percent of Muslim children received full vaccination in the<br />

state. The percentage of children who received full vaccination was the highest (37 percent) for<br />

scheduled caste children, followed by over 32 percent for other caste children and the lowest (14<br />

percent) for scheduled tribe children. Further, percentage of children who received full vaccination<br />

was the highest (42 percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />

lowest (26 percent) for children having non-literate mother, while it was 31 percent for children<br />

whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of children who received full vaccination<br />

was the highest (40 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest (12 percent) for children<br />

with low SLI, while it was 34 percent for children with medium SLI. These data suggest that there<br />

exists positive association between percent of children fully vaccinated and education level and<br />

standard of living index of the women (Figure 5.3).


83<br />

Figure 5 .3<br />

Percentage of Children Age 12-23 months<br />

Who Have Received All Vaccination<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Sex of the Child<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Caste<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 years@<br />

10 & above<br />

Standard of Living Index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

12<br />

14<br />

27<br />

32<br />

30<br />

33<br />

31<br />

31<br />

33<br />

31<br />

34<br />

37<br />

37<br />

42<br />

40<br />

0 15 30 45<br />

Percent<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

@ Literate mothers with no years of schooling are also included.<br />

Table 5.5 gives percentage of children age 12-23 months and 24-35 months with a vaccination<br />

card that was shown to the interviewer and percentage who received specific vaccinations by 12<br />

months of age according to place of residence in Jammu& Kashmir State. The percentage of<br />

vaccination card shown to the interviewer was 52 percent for children aged 12-23 months as<br />

against 49 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of vaccination card<br />

shown to the interviewer was 53 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against over 49 percent<br />

for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of vaccination<br />

card shown to the interviewer was 49 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 47<br />

percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state.<br />

The percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by 12 months of age was 86<br />

percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 90 percent for children aged 24-35 months in<br />

the state. The percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by 12 months of age was<br />

86 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 89 percent for children aged 24-35 months<br />

in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by<br />

12 months of age was 85 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 94 percent for<br />

children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage of children who received


84<br />

Table 5.5 CHILDHOOD VACCINATION RECEIVED BY 12 MONTHS OF AGE<br />

Percentage of children age 12-23 months and 24-35 months with a vaccination card that was shown to the interviewer and<br />

percentage who received specific vaccinations by 12 months of age according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Vaccination status<br />

12-23<br />

months<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

24-35<br />

months<br />

12-23<br />

months<br />

24-35<br />

months<br />

12-23<br />

months<br />

24-35<br />

months<br />

Vaccination card shown to interviewer<br />

51.6<br />

49.0<br />

52.6<br />

49.5<br />

48.9<br />

47.2<br />

Percentage vaccinated by 12 months of age<br />

Polio 0<br />

85.8<br />

89.9<br />

85.9<br />

88.7<br />

85.5<br />

93.8<br />

BCG<br />

91.5<br />

96.8<br />

90.4<br />

96.0<br />

94.2<br />

99.3<br />

Polio doses<br />

No Polio<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Don’t remember<br />

7.5<br />

7.8<br />

28.9<br />

42.3<br />

13.6<br />

5.5<br />

3.9<br />

12.6<br />

65.8<br />

12.2<br />

7.6<br />

5.2<br />

31.8<br />

42.0<br />

13.5<br />

5.5<br />

4.8<br />

11.6<br />

64.5<br />

13.7<br />

7.1<br />

14.2<br />

21.6<br />

43.2<br />

13.8<br />

5.7<br />

1.2<br />

15.7<br />

70.1<br />

7.3<br />

DPT injection<br />

No DPT<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Don’t remember/missing<br />

9.4<br />

12.7<br />

22.1<br />

40.8<br />

14.8<br />

3.7<br />

7.1<br />

23.4<br />

53.2<br />

12.6<br />

10.3<br />

13.3<br />

23.8<br />

36.9<br />

15.6<br />

4.3<br />

8.0<br />

24.3<br />

50.4<br />

13.1<br />

7.2<br />

11.3<br />

18.0<br />

50.6<br />

12.9<br />

1.7<br />

4.1<br />

20.7<br />

62.6<br />

10.9<br />

Measles<br />

77.9<br />

86.7<br />

79.4<br />

87.5<br />

74.0<br />

84.1<br />

Full 1 vaccination<br />

32.0<br />

43.2<br />

30.0<br />

39.9<br />

36.9<br />

54.2<br />

No vaccination at all<br />

2.6<br />

0.8<br />

2.5<br />

1.0<br />

2.8<br />

0.0<br />

Number of children<br />

644<br />

909<br />

461<br />

696<br />

183<br />

213<br />

Note: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001<br />

1<br />

BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles<br />

BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 91 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against<br />

97 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of children who received<br />

BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 90 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against<br />

96 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of<br />

children who received BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 94 percent for children aged<br />

12-23 months as against 99 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state.<br />

The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccination by 12 months of<br />

age was 42 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 66 percent for children aged 24-35<br />

months in the state. The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccination by 12<br />

months of age was 42 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 64 percent for children aged<br />

24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received three<br />

doses of Polio vaccination by 12 months of age was 43 percent for children aged 12-23 months<br />

as against 70 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage<br />

of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination by 12 months of age was 41 percent for<br />

children aged 12-23 months as against 53 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The<br />

percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination by 12 months of age was 37<br />

percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 50 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural


85<br />

areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination<br />

by 12 months of age was 51 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 63 percent for<br />

children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage of children who received<br />

Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 78 percent for children aged 12-23 months as<br />

against 87 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of children who<br />

received Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 79 percent for children aged 12-23<br />

months as against 87 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly,<br />

percentage of children who received Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 74 percent for<br />

children aged 12-23 months as against 84 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas<br />

of the state. Further, percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months of age was<br />

32 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 43 percent for children aged 24-35 months<br />

in the state. The percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months of age was 30<br />

percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 40 percent for children aged 24-35 months in<br />

rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months<br />

of age was 37 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 54 percent for children aged 24-35<br />

months in urban areas of the state. Figure 5.4 gives child vaccination by age.<br />

Figure 5.4<br />

Child vaccination by age<br />

54<br />

Percent<br />

32<br />

30<br />

37<br />

43<br />

40<br />

Age 12-23 months<br />

Age 24-35 months<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

5.3 Source of Immunization<br />

Table 5.6 gives percent distribution of children under three years of age who have received any<br />

vaccination by the source of last vaccine, according to place of residence and availability of health<br />

facility in the village. Over 91 percent of the children were immunized at the government health<br />

facility, four percent at the private health facility and over two percent at the ISM and other<br />

facility, while over percent were not sure about the place of immunization. Further, children who<br />

were immunized at the government health facility received vaccination from ‘Government/Municipal<br />

hospital’ (70 percent),‘Community/Primary health centre’ (11 percent),‘sub-centre’ (nine percent)<br />

and ’RCH/MCP camp’ (one percent). The percentage of children receiving vaccination from the<br />

private health facility was lower in rural areas (three percent) than in urban areas (nine percent).<br />

Ninety percent of the children received their vaccination from the government health facility in<br />

urban areas. Further, 93 percent of the children living in villages having no health facility in the<br />

village as against 92 percent of the children living in villages having health facility in the village<br />

received vaccination from the government health facility. Thus, the main source of vaccination of


86<br />

Table 5.6 SOURCE OF CHILDHOOD VACCINATION<br />

Percent distribution of children under age 3 who have received any vaccination by source of last vaccination, according to place<br />

of residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Source of vaccination<br />

Total<br />

Residence<br />

Availability of health<br />

facility 1 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Government health sector<br />

Government/municipal hospital<br />

Community/primary health centre<br />

Sub-centre<br />

RCH/MCP camp<br />

69.8<br />

11.4<br />

9.4<br />

0.9<br />

67.2<br />

11.8<br />

11.9<br />

1.2<br />

77.4<br />

10.2<br />

2.1<br />

0.0<br />

64.6<br />

14.6<br />

11.0<br />

2.8<br />

67.9<br />

11.0<br />

12.2<br />

0.8<br />

Private health sector<br />

Private hospital<br />

Private doctor<br />

1.8<br />

2.4<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

2.5<br />

6.2<br />

0.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.8<br />

1.1<br />

ISM 2 health facility<br />

Other<br />

1.8<br />

0.4<br />

1.9<br />

0.5<br />

1.3<br />

0.0<br />

3.6<br />

0.0<br />

1.5<br />

0.6<br />

Do not remember<br />

Missing<br />

1.4<br />

0.7<br />

1.7<br />

0.9<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

1.2<br />

0.1<br />

1.9<br />

1.1<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of children<br />

2,076<br />

Note: Table includes last and last but one living children born in the three years preceding the survey<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />

dispensary within the village<br />

2<br />

Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />

1,549<br />

527<br />

344<br />

1,2<strong>04</strong><br />

children was the government health facility in the Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />

5.4 Vitamin A and IFA Supplements<br />

Vitamin-A deficiency is one of the most common nutritional deficiency disorders in the world, affecting<br />

more than 250 million children worldwide (Bolem et. al., 1997). The child survival programme also<br />

includes administration of five doses of Vitamin-A for prevention of night blindness and<br />

distribution of IFA for iron supplement. In Round-II, mothers of children born during three years<br />

preceding the survey were asked whether their children had received a dose of Vitamin-A and<br />

IFA tablets/syrup. Those who said that their children had received a dose of Vitamin-A and IFA<br />

tablets/syrup were further asked how many doses were given. Table 5.7 gives percentage of<br />

children age 12-35 months who received at least one dose of Vitamin-A and IFA tablets/syrup by<br />

selected background characteristics in the state. Over 39 percent of the children received at least<br />

one dose of Vitamin-A in the state – 37 percent in rural areas and 47 percent in urban areas. Over<br />

37 percent of male children as against 42 percent of female children received at least one dose of<br />

Vitamin-A in the state. The percentage of children who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A<br />

was the highest (45 percent) for first order births, followed by 41 percent for second order births<br />

and the lowest (24 percent) for fourth or higher order births. Over 45 percent of Hindu children<br />

as against over 33 percent of Muslim children received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A, while it<br />

was 71 percent for Sikh children. The percentage of children who received atleast one dose of<br />

Vitamin-A was the highest (44 percent) for other caste children, followed by 40 percent for<br />

scheduled caste children and the lowest (29 percent) for OBC children. The percentage of children<br />

who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A was the highest (59 percent) for children whose mother<br />

had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (30 percent) for children having non-literate


87<br />

Table 5.7 VITAMIN A AND IFA SUPPLEMENTATION FOR CHILDREN<br />

Percentage of children age 12-35 months who have received at least one dose of Vitamin A and iron folic acid tablets/syrup,<br />

according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Percentage who received at<br />

least one dose of vitamin A<br />

Percentage who received<br />

iron folic acid tablets/syrup<br />

Number of<br />

children<br />

Age of the child<br />

12-23 months<br />

24-35 months<br />

38.8<br />

40.0<br />

13.3<br />

11.9<br />

644<br />

909<br />

Sex of the child<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

37.5<br />

41.9<br />

8.9<br />

16.8<br />

847<br />

707<br />

Birth order<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

45.0<br />

41.2<br />

37.4<br />

24.3<br />

14.3<br />

15.4<br />

8.4<br />

5.8<br />

576<br />

505<br />

243<br />

229<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

36.8<br />

47.4<br />

8.8<br />

23.2<br />

1,157<br />

396<br />

Mother’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 years@<br />

10 years and above<br />

29.7<br />

41.2<br />

58.7<br />

6.5<br />

12.7<br />

24.6<br />

841<br />

303<br />

408<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Other<br />

45.5<br />

33.5<br />

70.7<br />

20.3<br />

7.6<br />

6.3<br />

6<strong>04</strong><br />

893<br />

57<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

40.2<br />

29.3<br />

28.7<br />

44.4<br />

10.1<br />

18.6<br />

7.2<br />

14.2<br />

217<br />

103<br />

277<br />

939<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

34.5<br />

33.6<br />

57.2<br />

9.2<br />

8.1<br />

25.2<br />

286<br />

888<br />

379<br />

Availability of health facility in the village 1<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

37.0<br />

36.2<br />

9.2<br />

7.6<br />

9<strong>04</strong><br />

253<br />

Total<br />

39.5<br />

12.5<br />

1,553<br />

Note-1: Table includes last and last but one living children born in the three years preceding the survey. Note-2: Total includes<br />

4 children with missing information with mother education were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate mother with no years of schooling are also included here. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and<br />

missing cases. 1 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital,<br />

and government dispensary within the village.<br />

mother, while it was 41 percent for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />

percentage of children who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A was 57 percent for children<br />

with high SLI as against 34 percent for children with low and medium SLI. Further, 37 percent of<br />

children living in villages having health facility in the village as against 36 percent of children<br />

living in villages having no facility in the village received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A.<br />

The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/syrup was over 12 percent in the<br />

state – nine percent in rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. Nine percent of male children as


88<br />

against 17 percent of female children received IFA tablets/syrup. Twenty percent of Hindu children<br />

as against eight percent of Muslim children received IFA tablets/syrup, while it was six percent<br />

for other children. The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/syrup was the highest (19<br />

percent) for scheduled tribe children, followed by 14 percent for other caste children and the<br />

lowest (seven percent) for OBC children. The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/<br />

syrup was the highest (25 percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above<br />

and the lowest (over six percent) for children having non-literate mother, while it was 13 percent<br />

for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who<br />

received IFA tablets/syrup was the highest (25 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest<br />

(eight percent) for children with medium SLI, while it was nine percent for children with low SLI.<br />

5.5 Immunization Coverage by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 5.8 gives percentage of children aged 12-23 months with a vaccination card that was shown<br />

to the interviewer and percentage who received specific vaccinations by district. The percentage of<br />

children who received Polio-0 was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil and Leh districts,<br />

followed by 98 percent in Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (23 percent) in Poonch<br />

district, while it was 88 percent for the state. The percentage of children who received BCG injection<br />

was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil and Leh districts, followed by 97 percent in<br />

Baramula Udhampur districts and the lowest (49 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 95 percent<br />

for the state. The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest<br />

(57 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 54 percent in Leh district and the lowest (five percent)<br />

in Srinagar district, while it was 48 percent for the state. The percentage of children who received<br />

three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (56 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 54<br />

percent in Jammu district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 56 percent<br />

for the state. The percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (100<br />

percent) in Kargil district, followed by 95 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (29 percent)<br />

in Poonch district, while it was 83 percent for the state. Further, percentage of children who<br />

received full immunization was the highest (50 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 44<br />

percent in Jammu district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 39 percent<br />

for the state (see Map-5). The percentage of children who received at least one dose of Vitamin-A<br />

was the highest (76 percent) in Pulwama district, followed by 74 percent in Kupwara district and<br />

the lowest (zero percent) in Balamula district, while it was 39 percent for the state.<br />

5.6 Child Morbidity and Treatment<br />

This section discusses the awareness, prevalence and treatment of diarrhoea and acute respiratory<br />

infection (ARI). Mothers of surviving children born during three years preceding the survey were<br />

asked if their children suffered from cough and cold or diarrhoea during the two weeks preceding<br />

the survey, and if so, the type of treatment that had been given. Accuracy of all these measures is<br />

affected by the reliability of the mother’s recall of when the diseases occurred.<br />

5.6.1 Awareness of Diarrhoea<br />

Diarrhoea is a major killer disease of children under five years of age. Deaths from acute diarrhoea<br />

are mostly due to dehydration resulting from loss of water and electrolytes. An attempt was made<br />

to collect data on awareness of diarrhoea management and the practice followed during the<br />

episode of diarrhoea. Table 5.9 gives percentage of women who are aware of diarrhoea management,


89<br />

Table 5.8 CHILDHOOD VACCINATION BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of children age 12-23 months with a vaccination card that shown to the interviewer and percentage who received specific<br />

vaccinations by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Percentage vaccinated<br />

Polio 0 BCG DPT3 Polio3 Measles Full 1 None<br />

Percentage received at least<br />

one dose of Vitamin A 3<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

100.0<br />

90.7<br />

87.0<br />

71.8<br />

93.8<br />

100.0<br />

89.7<br />

97.2<br />

91.7<br />

87.9<br />

29.5<br />

15.1<br />

57.0<br />

23.0<br />

49.3<br />

39.4<br />

11.3<br />

55.9<br />

18.9<br />

54.2<br />

89.2<br />

74.2<br />

95.0<br />

85.2<br />

74.5<br />

19.2<br />

9.3<br />

50.5<br />

18.9<br />

43.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.2<br />

56.4<br />

34.4<br />

0.0<br />

18.8<br />

51.1<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

100.0<br />

70.2<br />

97.9<br />

100.0<br />

98.3<br />

100.0<br />

93.8<br />

94.3<br />

100.0<br />

93.5<br />

22.5<br />

32.2<br />

15.9<br />

53.9<br />

18.5<br />

18.8<br />

35.3<br />

25.8<br />

47.9<br />

30.8<br />

100.0<br />

84.5<br />

78.4<br />

87.7<br />

76.1<br />

6.4<br />

29.6<br />

7.2<br />

23.4<br />

5.3<br />

0.0<br />

6.2<br />

2.1<br />

0.0<br />

1.7<br />

73.1<br />

3.2<br />

74.2<br />

60.5<br />

76.0<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

22.7<br />

71.7<br />

70.7<br />

69.0<br />

48.9<br />

89.1<br />

76.0<br />

97.5<br />

41.1<br />

19.4<br />

5.3<br />

40.4<br />

45.2<br />

25.0<br />

5.3<br />

39.1<br />

29.3<br />

69.2<br />

76.0<br />

55.4<br />

13.4<br />

9.5<br />

5.3<br />

20.2<br />

14.4<br />

0.0<br />

19.0<br />

0.0<br />

9.6<br />

12.6<br />

7.7<br />

4.6<br />

Jammu & Kashmir 88.2 94.6 48.1 55.9 83.0 38.6<br />

Note: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001<br />

1<br />

BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles<br />

1.5<br />

39.5<br />

type of practice followed if child gets diarrhoea, and percentage of women whose child suffered<br />

from diarrhoea by selected background characteristics in Jammu& Kashmir State. The percentage<br />

of the mothers who had child birth during three years preceding the survey and were aware of<br />

diarrhoea management was 70 percent as compared to 48 percent in Round-I, and 60 percent<br />

were aware of ORS, which was 38 percent points up from Round-I. Fifty-three percent women<br />

were aware of salt and sugar solution; 19 percent women reported that they would continue normal<br />

food, 26 percent women said continue breastfeeding and 27 percent women said give plenty of<br />

fluids, while 30 percent women did not know what to give to a child who had diarrhoea.<br />

The percentage of women aware of diarrhoea management was 70 percent in the state –<br />

68 percent in rural areas and 75 percent in urban areas. Seventy-three percent of Hindu women<br />

as against 68 percent of Muslim women were aware of diarrhoea management, while it was 80<br />

percent for Sikh women. Sixty-seven percent of SC/ST women as against 76 percent of OBC<br />

women were aware of diarrhoea management, while it was 69 percent for other caste women. The<br />

percentage of women aware of diarrhoea management was the highest (85 percent) for women<br />

who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (63 percent) for women who had studied<br />

for 0-9 years, while it was 66 percent for non-literate women. Similarly, percentage of women aware<br />

of diarrhoea management was the highest (80 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest<br />

(60 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 69 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />

The percentage of women aware of ORS was 60 percent in the state – 58 percent in rural<br />

areas and 64 percent in urban areas. Knowledge of ORS was higher among Sikh women (64<br />

percent) than Hindu and Muslim women (over 59 percent). The percentage of women aware of<br />

ORS was the highest (71 percent) for OBC women, followed by 59 percent for scheduled tribe<br />

women and the lowest (52 percent) for scheduled caste women. The percentage of women aware<br />

of ORS was the highest (77 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />

lowest (50 percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 56 percent for nonliterate<br />

women. Similarly, percentage of women aware of ORS was the highest (68 percent) for


90<br />

Table 5.9 AWARENESS OF DIARRHOEA<br />

Percentage of women who are aware of diarrhoea management, type of practice followed if child gets diarrhoea, and percentage of<br />

women whose child suffered 1 from diarrhoea by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Knowledge<br />

of diarrhoea<br />

management<br />

Give ORS<br />

Type of practices to be followed if child gets diarrhoea*<br />

Salt and<br />

sugar solution<br />

Continue<br />

normal food<br />

Continue Give plenty<br />

breastfeeding of fluids<br />

Do not<br />

know<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Age<br />

15-24<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

72.1<br />

69.3<br />

71.2<br />

61.3<br />

59.8<br />

58.9<br />

54.7<br />

52.3<br />

54.8<br />

20.0<br />

20.0<br />

12.7<br />

28.5<br />

26.3<br />

24.2<br />

21.9<br />

26.9<br />

31.9<br />

28.4<br />

31.0<br />

28.8<br />

416<br />

1,867<br />

294<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

68.4<br />

75.1<br />

58.5<br />

64.3<br />

52.3<br />

55.1<br />

17.9<br />

23.3<br />

23.9<br />

34.2<br />

24.2<br />

34.5<br />

32.1<br />

24.5<br />

1,954<br />

624<br />

Mother’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

66.2<br />

62.9<br />

84.8<br />

56.1<br />

50.2<br />

77.1<br />

54.3<br />

41.4<br />

59.9<br />

17.2<br />

13.4<br />

28.7<br />

26.7<br />

19.9<br />

31.3<br />

28.0<br />

16.7<br />

32.0<br />

34.1<br />

37.3<br />

15.1<br />

1,444<br />

517<br />

616<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

72.8<br />

67.8<br />

79.6<br />

59.5<br />

59.9<br />

64.3<br />

48.0<br />

56.4<br />

44.9<br />

19.7<br />

19.1<br />

16.2<br />

23.3<br />

28.0<br />

36.6<br />

21.3<br />

30.0<br />

27.1<br />

27.9<br />

32.6<br />

11.3<br />

926<br />

1,561<br />

70<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

67.5<br />

67.0<br />

75.6<br />

69.1<br />

52.5<br />

58.6<br />

70.6<br />

58.1<br />

44.3<br />

49.4<br />

63.5<br />

52.4<br />

18.2<br />

23.8<br />

16.4<br />

20.0<br />

20.2<br />

18.0<br />

31.6<br />

27.3<br />

18.3<br />

25.3<br />

28.3<br />

28.2<br />

32.5<br />

35.8<br />

25.4<br />

30.8<br />

340<br />

155<br />

489<br />

1,565<br />

Standard of living<br />

index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

60.1<br />

68.6<br />

80.4<br />

50.6<br />

59.3<br />

68.1<br />

45.6<br />

55.0<br />

53.4<br />

23.8<br />

16.5<br />

22.4<br />

22.6<br />

26.7<br />

28.4<br />

15.1<br />

29.3<br />

28.4<br />

40.5<br />

31.5<br />

19.5<br />

442<br />

1,515<br />

621<br />

Availability of health<br />

facility 2 in the village<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

68.6<br />

67.6<br />

59.7<br />

54.5<br />

53.8<br />

47.6<br />

17.2<br />

20.0<br />

23.8<br />

24.2<br />

20.7<br />

36.1<br />

31.8<br />

32.9<br />

1,511<br />

443<br />

Total<br />

70.0<br />

59.9<br />

53.0<br />

Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II. 1 Last two weeks<br />

prior to survey. Total includes 1 woman with missing information on education who are not shown separately. Total includes 22<br />

women in other religion who are not shown separately. @ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure<br />

may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or<br />

referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />

women with high SLI and the lowest (51 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 59<br />

percent for women with medium SLI. Further, 60 percent of the women living in villages having<br />

health facility in the village as against 54 percent of the women living in villages having no health<br />

facility in the village were aware of ORS.<br />

5.6.2 Treatment of Diarrhoea<br />

Table 5.10 gives percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and sought<br />

treatment by source of treatment, according to place of residence and availability of health facility in<br />

the village. The percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea was eight percent in<br />

the state – seven percent in rural areas and 12 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women<br />

whose child suffered from diarrhoea was six percent for women living in villages having health<br />

19.2<br />

26.4<br />

26.7<br />

30.3<br />

2,578


91<br />

Table 5.10 TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA<br />

Percentage of women who sought treatment whose child suffered from diarrhoea and by source of treatment, according to place<br />

of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

fcaility 2 in the village<br />

Sought treatment/ source of treatment<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban Yes No<br />

Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />

diarrhoea<br />

7.9<br />

6.7<br />

11.7<br />

5.7<br />

10.2<br />

Number of women<br />

2,578<br />

1,954<br />

624<br />

1,511<br />

443<br />

Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />

diarrhoea treated with ORS<br />

69.5<br />

66.2<br />

75.4<br />

62.5<br />

(71.4)<br />

Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />

diarrhoea sought treatment<br />

80.3<br />

79.4<br />

81.9<br />

82.7<br />

(65.7)<br />

Number of women<br />

205<br />

132<br />

73<br />

87<br />

45<br />

Source of treatment<br />

Government health facility<br />

Hospital/dispensary<br />

UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />

CHC/ <strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

56.3<br />

1.1<br />

1.6<br />

17.6<br />

3.4<br />

50.6<br />

1.7<br />

2.5<br />

23.8<br />

5.3<br />

66.4<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

6.8<br />

0.0<br />

49.2<br />

0.8<br />

3.7<br />

34.2<br />

3.0<br />

(56.5)<br />

(4.3)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(4.3)<br />

(4.3)<br />

Private health facility<br />

NGO/Trust hospital/clinic<br />

Private hospital clinic<br />

0.2<br />

12.2<br />

0.4<br />

9.9<br />

0.0<br />

16.1<br />

0.6<br />

7.7<br />

(0.0)<br />

(17.4)<br />

ISM3 facility<br />

Home remedy<br />

Other<br />

42.8<br />

0.6<br />

2.6<br />

28.3<br />

0.9<br />

4.1<br />

68.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

30.5<br />

1.3<br />

4.4<br />

(26.1)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(4.3)<br />

Percent distribution of women who seek<br />

treatment by<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />

Relative/friends<br />

Chemist/medical shop<br />

87.2<br />

7.3<br />

1.4<br />

4.0<br />

82.3<br />

9.1<br />

2.3<br />

6.4<br />

95.9<br />

4.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

82.0<br />

9.9<br />

0.0<br />

8.1<br />

(78.3)<br />

(8.7)<br />

(8.7)<br />

(4.3)<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

164<br />

105<br />

60<br />

72<br />

33<br />

Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase- II.<br />

1<br />

Last two weeks prior to survey. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital,<br />

government hospital, and government dispensary within the village. 3 Either government or private health facility of Indian<br />

System of Medicine () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

facility in the village as against 10 percent for women living in villages having no health facility<br />

in the village. Further, percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and treated<br />

with ORS was over 69 percent in the state – 66 percent in rural areas and 75 percent in urban areas.<br />

The percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and treated with ORS was over 62<br />

percent of the women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 71 percent<br />

of women living in villages having no health facility in the village. More of the women living in<br />

villages having no health facility in the village whose child suffered from diarrhoeas treated the<br />

child with ORS.<br />

Further, percentage of women whose children suffered from diarrhoea-sought treatment was


92<br />

80 percent in the state – 79 percent in rural areas and 82 percent in urban areas. Eighty-three<br />

percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 66 percent of<br />

women living in villages having no health facility in the village whose children suffered from<br />

diarrhoea sought treatment. The percentage of women who sought treatment from government<br />

health facility was 80 percent, from private health facility 12 percent, from ISM facility 43<br />

percent and from other health facility three percent, while one percent women treated the child<br />

with home remedy. In other words, more than one-third women sought treatment from more than<br />

facility. Eighty-seven percent women sought treatment from the doctor, seven percent from ANM/<br />

Nurse/LHV and four percent from chemist/medical shop, while over percent from relatives/friends.<br />

5.6.3 Awareness of Pneumonia<br />

Another major killer disease among infants and children is Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI)<br />

including pneumonia. Early diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics can prevent a large proportion<br />

of ARI/pneumonia deaths. An attempt was made to understand the awareness level of pneumonia,<br />

and the proportion of children who had suffered from pneumonia during the last two weeks<br />

before the survey and their health seeking behaviour. Table 5.11 gives percentage of women who<br />

are aware of danger signs of pneumonia by signs by selected background characteristics and<br />

availability of health facility in the village in the state. Only 31 percent of the women were aware<br />

of danger signs of pneumonia in the state – 28 percent in rural areas and 38 percent in urban areas.<br />

The figure was slightly up from over 26 percent in Round-I. Knowledge of danger signs of pneumonia<br />

was highest (35 percent) for women aged 35-44 years and lowest (23 percent) for women aged<br />

15-24 years. Over 36 percent of Hindu women as against 28 percent of Muslim women were aware<br />

danger signs of pneumonia, while it was 25 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women<br />

aware of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (34 percent) for scheduled caste women,<br />

followed by 32 percent for other caste women and the lowest (27 percent) for scheduled tribe women.<br />

The percentage of women aware of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (42 percent) for<br />

women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (25 percent) for non-literate women,<br />

while it was 34 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of women aware<br />

of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (37 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest<br />

(21 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 31 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />

Further, percentage of women aware of danger signs of pneumonia was 26 percent for women living<br />

in villages having health facility in the village as against 38 percent for women living in villages<br />

having no health facility in the village.<br />

Women, who were aware of the danger signs of pneumonia, were further asked about<br />

danger signs of pneumonia. Danger signs reported were ‘difficulty in breathing’ (89 percent),‘chest indrawing’<br />

(37 percent),‘not able to drink or take a feeding’ (63 percent),‘excessive drowsy and difficulty<br />

in keeping awake’ (37 percent),‘pain in chest and productive cough’ (62 percent),‘condition get worse<br />

than before’ (41 percent), ‘wheezing/whistling’ (17 percent) and ‘rapid breathing’ (28 percent).<br />

5.6.4 Treatment of Pneumonia<br />

Table 5.12 gives percentage of women whose child suffered from pneumonia and sought treatment<br />

and source of treatment according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the<br />

village. The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />

was 20 percent in the state – 20 percent in rural areas and 19 percent in urban areas. Further, percentage


Table 5.11 AWARENESS OF PNEUEMONIA<br />

Percentage of women who are aware of danger signs of pneumonia by signs by selected background characteristics and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Percentage<br />

of women<br />

aware of<br />

danger<br />

signs of<br />

pneumonia<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Difficulty in<br />

breathing<br />

Chest indrawing<br />

Not able to<br />

drink or<br />

take a<br />

feeding<br />

Danger signs of ARI<br />

Excessive<br />

drowsy and<br />

difficulty in<br />

keeping<br />

awake<br />

Pain in<br />

chest and<br />

productive<br />

cough<br />

Conditions<br />

get worse<br />

than before<br />

Wheezing/<br />

whistling<br />

Rapid<br />

breathing<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Age group (in years)<br />

15-24<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Mother’s education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Availability of health<br />

facility 2 in the village<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

22.8<br />

32.0<br />

34.9<br />

28.4<br />

38.4<br />

24.9<br />

34.5<br />

41.7<br />

36.5<br />

28.1<br />

25.0<br />

33.7<br />

27.2<br />

28.1<br />

31.8<br />

20.9<br />

31.3<br />

36.9<br />

25.6<br />

38.2<br />

416<br />

1,867<br />

294<br />

1,954<br />

624<br />

1,444<br />

517<br />

616<br />

926<br />

1,561<br />

70<br />

340<br />

155<br />

489<br />

1,565<br />

442<br />

1,515<br />

621<br />

1,511<br />

443<br />

84.7<br />

89.9<br />

86.8<br />

89.6<br />

87.1<br />

91.0<br />

87.9<br />

86.4<br />

83.0<br />

93.1<br />

*<br />

95.5<br />

78.1<br />

96.5<br />

86.5<br />

89.4<br />

89.3<br />

87.6<br />

88.4<br />

92.5<br />

42.1<br />

37.4<br />

27.9<br />

37.1<br />

36.0<br />

35.2<br />

21.1<br />

49.8<br />

35.2<br />

37.2<br />

*<br />

47.6<br />

41.6<br />

32.6<br />

34.7<br />

57.7<br />

28.8<br />

44.6<br />

39.1<br />

32.5<br />

61.0<br />

61.6<br />

72.8<br />

67.3<br />

53.0<br />

72.4<br />

67.1<br />

47.0<br />

44.7<br />

78.5<br />

*<br />

44.5<br />

47.6<br />

68.4<br />

67.4<br />

49.0<br />

75.8<br />

42.1<br />

61.6<br />

80.3<br />

36.0<br />

37.4<br />

34.9<br />

42.3<br />

24.4<br />

51.5<br />

22.0<br />

26.8<br />

20.9<br />

50.2<br />

*<br />

21.9<br />

43.3<br />

44.6<br />

37.9<br />

44.3<br />

45.1<br />

17.0<br />

32.6<br />

64.3<br />

64.2<br />

60.7<br />

67.5<br />

56.5<br />

74.7<br />

60.8<br />

73.8<br />

55.6<br />

57.5<br />

66.1<br />

*<br />

56.1<br />

51.5<br />

79.7<br />

59.7<br />

66.7<br />

64.2<br />

55.5<br />

63.6<br />

40.5<br />

39.2<br />

40.6<br />

46.5<br />

48.7<br />

23.7<br />

55.7<br />

29.4<br />

29.0<br />

26.5<br />

53.4<br />

*<br />

23.6<br />

50.1<br />

47.4<br />

42.9<br />

56.3<br />

46.2<br />

24.7<br />

44.1<br />

59.1<br />

18.1<br />

18.1<br />

6.9<br />

12.5<br />

26.4<br />

11.7<br />

11.3<br />

27.4<br />

25.3<br />

9.0<br />

*<br />

32.7<br />

15.6<br />

6.0<br />

16.1<br />

16.9<br />

11.3<br />

27.7<br />

11.4<br />

15.0<br />

24.0<br />

27.7<br />

35.6<br />

28.3<br />

28.4<br />

23.1<br />

37.8<br />

28.9<br />

24.8<br />

31.1<br />

*<br />

37.0<br />

42.3<br />

25.3<br />

26.1<br />

22.3<br />

26.7<br />

34.1<br />

28.1<br />

28.6<br />

95<br />

597<br />

103<br />

556<br />

239<br />

360<br />

178<br />

257<br />

338<br />

439<br />

17<br />

115<br />

42<br />

137<br />

498<br />

92<br />

474<br />

229<br />

386<br />

169<br />

Total<br />

30.8<br />

2,578<br />

88.9<br />

36.7<br />

63.0<br />

36.9<br />

62.0<br />

41.2<br />

16.7<br />

28.3<br />

795<br />

Note-1: Total includes 1 woman with missing information on education who is not shown separately. Note-2: Total includes 22 women in other religion who were not shown separately<br />

Note-3: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II. 1 Last two weeks prior to survey.<br />

@ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

2<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />

Total includes 4 women with missing information on education who are not shown separately.<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

93


Table 5.12 TREATMENT OF PNEUEMONIA<br />

Percentage of women who sought treatment whose child suffered 1 from cough and cold and source of treatment, according to<br />

place of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

fcaility 2 in the village<br />

Sought treatment/ source of treatment<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Yes No<br />

Percentage of women whose child suffered from<br />

cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />

19.7<br />

19.8<br />

19.4<br />

18.6<br />

24.2<br />

Number of women<br />

2,578<br />

1,954<br />

624<br />

1,511<br />

443<br />

Percentage of women sought treatment whose<br />

child suffered from cough and cold<br />

95.2<br />

94.6<br />

97.4<br />

96.2<br />

90.2<br />

Number of women<br />

502<br />

382<br />

120<br />

277<br />

105<br />

Source of treatment<br />

Government health facility<br />

Hospital/dispensary<br />

UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />

CHC/ <strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

77.0<br />

0.7<br />

1.5<br />

10.4<br />

3.5<br />

77.0<br />

0.8<br />

1.8<br />

13.2<br />

4.2<br />

77.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

77.4<br />

0.4<br />

1.2<br />

9.3<br />

2.5<br />

75.9<br />

1.9<br />

3.5<br />

24.4<br />

9.1<br />

Private health facility<br />

NGO/Trust hospital/clinic<br />

Private hospital clinic<br />

0.7<br />

10.9<br />

0.8<br />

7.6<br />

0.4<br />

21.0<br />

0.3<br />

7.6<br />

1.9<br />

7.6<br />

ISM3 facility<br />

Home remedy<br />

Other<br />

6.1<br />

2.3<br />

0.5<br />

6.5<br />

2.4<br />

0.6<br />

4.8<br />

2.0<br />

0.4<br />

6.8<br />

1.2<br />

0.1<br />

5.6<br />

5.7<br />

1.9<br />

Percent distribution of women who seek<br />

treatment by<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />

Dai (trained or untrained)<br />

Relative/friends<br />

Chemist/medical shop<br />

96.6<br />

2.4<br />

0.7<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

96.9<br />

1.8<br />

0.9<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

95.8<br />

4.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

95.8<br />

2.4<br />

1.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

100.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

478<br />

362<br />

117<br />

267<br />

95<br />

Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II.<br />

1<br />

Last two weeks prior to survey. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital,<br />

government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />

3<br />

Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />

of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing was 19 percent for<br />

women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 24 percent for women<br />

living in villages having no health facility in the village.<br />

The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />

who sought treatment was 95 percent in the state – 95 percent in rural areas and 97 percent in urban<br />

areas. The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />

who sought treatment was 96 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the<br />

village as against 90 percent for women living in villages having no health facility in the village.<br />

The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing sought<br />

treatment from government health facility was 93 percent, from private health facility 12 percent,<br />

94


from ISM facility six percent and less than one percent from other health facility, while over two<br />

percent women tried home remedy. In other words, eleven percent women sought treatment from<br />

more than one health facility. Ninety-seven percent women sought treatment from the doctor, over<br />

two percent from ANM/Nurse/LHV and the remaining one percent sought treatment other facilities.<br />

5.6.5 Awareness of Diarrhoea, ORS and Pneumonia and Incidence of Diarrhoea and Pneumonia<br />

by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 5.13 gives percentage of women by awareness of diarrhoea management, ORS, danger<br />

signs of pneumonia and whose child suffered from diarrhoea and pneumonia during last two<br />

weeks prior to survey by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women aware of<br />

diarrhoea management was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag district and the lowest (28<br />

percent) in Kathua district, while it was 70 percent for the state. The percentage of women aware<br />

of ORS was the highest (93 percent) in Anantnag district and the lowest (19 percent) in Kathua<br />

district, while it was 60 percent for the state. The percentage of women whose child suffered<br />

from diarrhoea was the highest (19 percent) in Srinagar district and the lowest (one percent) in<br />

Kathua district, while it was eight percent for the state. Further, percentage of women aware of<br />

danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (46 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (over<br />

five percent) in Leh district, while it was 31 percent for the state. The percentage of women whose<br />

child suffered from pneumonia was the highest (41 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (two<br />

percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 20 percent for the state.<br />

Table 5.13 KNOWLEDGE OF DIARRHOEA MANAGEMENT AND PNEUMONIA BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of women by awareness of diarrhoea management, ORS, danger signs of pneumonia and whose child had suffered<br />

from diarrhoea and pneumonia during last two weeks prior to survey by district, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Percentage of women aware of<br />

Percentage of women<br />

Diarrhoea<br />

Management ORS<br />

whose child suffered 1<br />

from diarrhoea<br />

100.0<br />

41.8<br />

65.7<br />

58.6<br />

90.5<br />

93.3<br />

26.4<br />

60.4<br />

49.6<br />

75.1<br />

2.4<br />

14.8<br />

2.5<br />

15.9<br />

13.1<br />

Percentage of women aware<br />

of danger signs of<br />

pneumonia<br />

28.7<br />

8.3<br />

46.2<br />

33.8<br />

44.0<br />

Percentage of women<br />

whose child suffered 1 from<br />

pneumonia<br />

1.9<br />

17.5<br />

40.9<br />

21.5<br />

14.3<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

98.8<br />

28.2<br />

41.5<br />

89.0<br />

42.1<br />

85.7<br />

19.0<br />

31.8<br />

80.0<br />

32.2<br />

7.5<br />

1.1<br />

5.7<br />

14.4<br />

6.5<br />

14.1<br />

8.3<br />

16.0<br />

5.5<br />

15.7<br />

7.6<br />

26.0<br />

10.8<br />

5.0<br />

12.5<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

84.9<br />

61.5<br />

73.2<br />

63.2<br />

77.3<br />

58.9<br />

51.3<br />

41.6<br />

3.9<br />

5.2<br />

18.7<br />

7.7<br />

11.7<br />

42.8<br />

13.3<br />

18.5<br />

22.0<br />

13.6<br />

28.0<br />

17.7<br />

Jammu & Kashmir 70.0<br />

59.9<br />

7.9<br />

30.8<br />

19.7<br />

Note: Table based on women with last and last but one living children born since 01.01.1999 /01.01.2001. 1 Last two weeks prior to survey.<br />

95


Map-5<br />

Percentage of Children (Age 12-23 Months) Who Have Received Full Vaccination<br />

96


CHAPTER VI<br />

FAMILY PLANNING<br />

The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme has been implemented with a new philosophy and<br />

direction to meet the health care needs of women and children. It envisages the provision of<br />

couples to control their fertility and have sexual relations free from the fear of pregnancy.<br />

Provision of free contraceptive services to all the needy couples is one of the components of the<br />

RCH programme. In DLHS-RCH a separate section on family planning was canvassed to all the<br />

eligible women to assess the knowledge and practice of various family planning methods. The<br />

information on source of currently adopted contraceptive method, source of supply of the method<br />

and health problems related to contraceptive use were collected from current users. The current<br />

non-users were asked about the past status of contraceptive use, reason for not using<br />

contraceptives currently and future intention to adopt a family planning method.<br />

An attempt was made to understand why male methods of family planning especially that<br />

of vasectomy was not in common use. The husbands of sampled eligible women were asked about<br />

the contraceptive method they would recommend to a couple who was not desirous of any<br />

additional children. They were also asked about the reasons for not preferring male methods and<br />

their knowledge about the no-scalpel vasectomy. This chapter presents the results of data on<br />

contraceptive practices collected from both the sampled women and their husbands.<br />

6.1 Knowledge of Family Planning Methods<br />

Lack of knowledge of various contraceptive choices can be a major barrier in the promotion and<br />

use of contraceptives among couples. In DLHS-RCH information on knowledge of contraceptives was<br />

obtained by asking a question, “Which are the family planning methods are you aware of?” to each<br />

sampled women. The knowledge of no-scalpel vasectomy was also asked to the husbands of eligible<br />

women. If the respondent did not recognise the name of the family planning method, he was given<br />

a brief description on how a particular method was to be used. The DLHS-RCH assesses the<br />

knowledge of female sterilisation, male sterilisation including NSV, IUD, Pills, condom and<br />

traditional methods along similar lines.<br />

Table 6.1 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who know any<br />

contraceptive methods by specific method and selected background characteristics in Jammu &<br />

Kashmir State. The data shows that knowledge of any method including any modern contraceptive<br />

method was almost universal in the state. The knowledge of any modern method among the eligible<br />

women was 96 percent in the state – 96 percent in rural areas and 99 percent in urban areas.<br />

Further, knowledge of any modern spacing method among eligible women was 82 percent in the<br />

state – 79 percent in rural areas and 91 percent in urban areas. The knowledge of all modern<br />

method among eligible women was 32 percent in the state – 28 percent in rural areas and 43<br />

percent in urban areas. The difference in the knowledge of any modern methods and all modern<br />

methods is 64 percentage points.<br />

The extent of knowledge about female sterilisation was 88 percent – 42 percent for<br />

Tubectomy and 22 percent for Laparoscopy. Similarly, knowledge about male sterilisation was 67<br />

percent in the state – 21 percent for vasectomy and eight percent foe No-scalpel-vasectomy. The


Table 6.1 KNOWLEDGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS<br />

Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years who know any contraceptive method by specific method and<br />

selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Contraceptive methods<br />

Total<br />

Availability of health facility in<br />

Residence<br />

the village 3<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Any method<br />

Any modern method<br />

Any modern spacing method 1<br />

All modern methods 2<br />

97.3<br />

96.5<br />

82.3<br />

32.1<br />

96.9<br />

95.9<br />

79.4<br />

28.5<br />

98.8<br />

98.8<br />

91.3<br />

43.5<br />

97.2<br />

97.2<br />

80.4<br />

35.7<br />

96.7<br />

95.4<br />

79.1<br />

26.0<br />

Female sterilization<br />

Tubectomy<br />

Laparoscopy<br />

88.0<br />

41.6<br />

21.9<br />

85.4<br />

40.2<br />

21.9<br />

96.2<br />

46.2<br />

21.9<br />

89.9<br />

38.6<br />

18.4<br />

83.8<br />

40.8<br />

23.1<br />

Male sterilization<br />

Vasectomy<br />

No-scalpel vasectomy<br />

67.4<br />

21.4<br />

8.2<br />

63.2<br />

20.9<br />

8.5<br />

80.8<br />

23.1<br />

7.4<br />

74.2<br />

23.0<br />

12.1<br />

59.3<br />

20.1<br />

7.2<br />

IUD/Loop<br />

54.2<br />

49.9<br />

67.8<br />

56.4<br />

47.5<br />

Pills<br />

Daily<br />

Weekly<br />

Condom/Nirodh<br />

Sponge (today)<br />

Injectables<br />

Norplant<br />

Contraceptive herbs<br />

Any traditional method<br />

Any other Indian system of<br />

medicinal contraceptives<br />

63.2<br />

38.8<br />

36.2<br />

67.1<br />

10.6<br />

8.1<br />

4.3<br />

4.2<br />

19.2<br />

3.0<br />

61.8<br />

39.5<br />

36.7<br />

63.5<br />

9.7<br />

7.6<br />

3.9<br />

3.5<br />

19.3<br />

2.9<br />

67.9<br />

36.6<br />

34.7<br />

78.6<br />

13.8<br />

9.6<br />

5.7<br />

6.2<br />

18.7<br />

3.6<br />

67.8<br />

39.1<br />

32.4<br />

64.8<br />

5.5<br />

8.2<br />

1.7<br />

1.7<br />

19.3<br />

1.5<br />

59.6<br />

39.6<br />

38.2<br />

63.0<br />

11.1<br />

7.4<br />

4.6<br />

4.2<br />

19.4<br />

3.3<br />

Number of women<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

2,086<br />

5,765<br />

1<br />

Include IUD, pills and condom. 2 Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, pills and condom<br />

3<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village.<br />

Figure 6.1<br />

Knowledge of Family Planning Method<br />

Any modern<br />

97<br />

Any modern spacing<br />

82<br />

All modern<br />

32<br />

Any tradtional<br />

19<br />

Female sterilization<br />

88<br />

Male sterilization<br />

67<br />

IUD<br />

54<br />

Pills<br />

63<br />

Condom<br />

67<br />

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percent<br />

98


extent of knowledge among eligible women about spacing methods was 54 percent for IUD/Loop,<br />

63 percent for Pills, 67 percent for condom/nirodh. Knowledge about Daily Pills was 39 percent as<br />

against 36 percent for Weekly Pills. The knowledge about other contraceptive methods was 11<br />

percent for Sponge (today), eight percent for Injectables and four percent for Norplant. Further, extent<br />

of knowledge of any traditional method was 19 percent, contraceptive herbs four percent and any<br />

ISM contraceptives three percent. Figure 6.1 shows knowledge of family planning method.<br />

6.1.1 Knowledge of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 6.2 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who know any<br />

contraceptive method by specific method in Jammu & Kashmir State. In eight out of 14 districts<br />

knowledge about any contraceptives method was 99 percent or more and it was the lowest (89<br />

percent) in Srinagar district. The extent of knowledge about any modern method was 99 percent or<br />

more in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Rajouri<br />

districts and it was the lowest (88 percent) in Srinagar and Udhampur districts. The extent of<br />

knowledge about any modern spacing method was the highest (over 99 percent) in Anantnag and<br />

Doda districts, followed by 98 percent in Baramula and Leh districts and the lowest (27 percent) in<br />

Badgam district, while it was 82 percent for the state. The percentage of women having knowledge<br />

about all modern methods was the highest (73 percent) in Pulwama district, followed by 72 percent<br />

in Kupwara district and the lowest (less than one percent) in Badgam district. The percentage of<br />

women having knowledge about all modern methods was higher than that of state (32 percent) in<br />

Baramula, Jammu, Doda, Kupwara and Pulwama districts and in the remaining nine districts it was<br />

lower than that of the state.<br />

Table 6.2 KNOWLEDGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years who know any contraceptive method by specific method and district,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Any<br />

method<br />

Any<br />

modern 1<br />

method<br />

Any<br />

modern<br />

spacing 2<br />

method<br />

All modern 3<br />

methods<br />

Male<br />

sterilization<br />

Female<br />

sterilization IUD Pill<br />

Condom<br />

/Nirodh<br />

Any<br />

traditional<br />

method<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

97.6<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

99.9<br />

96.8<br />

99.2<br />

26.7<br />

97.7<br />

99.8<br />

92.1<br />

30.9<br />

0.5<br />

59.1<br />

39.8<br />

35.1<br />

71.7<br />

29.8<br />

99.7<br />

98.8<br />

70.8<br />

99.9<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

99.4<br />

77.8<br />

49.5<br />

8.0<br />

95.7<br />

49.7<br />

68.2<br />

94.5<br />

19.3<br />

96.4<br />

90.5<br />

60.3<br />

85.6<br />

10.3<br />

59.4<br />

93.9<br />

82.3<br />

54.4<br />

25.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

26.2<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

99.8<br />

95.7<br />

99.4<br />

99.8<br />

99.6<br />

99.7<br />

95.7<br />

99.2<br />

99.3<br />

99.6<br />

97.4<br />

55.4<br />

89.6<br />

97.6<br />

96.8<br />

18.5<br />

13.2<br />

71.9<br />

1.9<br />

72.9<br />

37.1<br />

71.4<br />

92.1<br />

8.7<br />

97.9<br />

99.0<br />

95.0<br />

98.9<br />

78.9<br />

99.3<br />

53.3<br />

33.2<br />

83.1<br />

56.1<br />

83.7<br />

94.7<br />

17.1<br />

85.2<br />

95.0<br />

88.6<br />

82.7<br />

51.1<br />

79.2<br />

78.2<br />

86.9<br />

19.8<br />

8.2<br />

26.5<br />

12.2<br />

29.5<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

93.9<br />

99.5<br />

89.3<br />

93.8<br />

93.3<br />

99.5<br />

87.9<br />

87.7<br />

69.7<br />

48.9<br />

70.8<br />

77.2<br />

13.2<br />

24.3<br />

5.7<br />

18.3<br />

65.6<br />

45.9<br />

18.2<br />

45.1<br />

75.9<br />

98.7<br />

58.2<br />

69.2<br />

41.7<br />

33.8<br />

25.8<br />

28.2<br />

40.4<br />

39.7<br />

40.7<br />

43.3<br />

39.7<br />

43.9<br />

58.2<br />

59.0<br />

9.1<br />

5.0<br />

12.1<br />

13.3<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

97.3<br />

96.5<br />

82.3<br />

32.1<br />

67.4<br />

88.0<br />

54.2<br />

63.2<br />

67.1<br />

19.2<br />

1<br />

Includes Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom. 2 Includes IUD, Pills and Condom. 3 Includes Female<br />

sterilization & Male sterilization & IUD & Pills and Condom.<br />

The extent of knowledge among eligible women about male sterilization was the highest<br />

(100 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 99 percent in Doda district and the lowest (nine<br />

99


percent) in Leh district, while it was 67 percent for the state. Similarly, the extent of knowledge<br />

among eligible women about female sterilization was 90 percent or more in nine districts and the<br />

lowest (58 percent) in Srinagar district. The percentage of eligible women having knowledge about<br />

IUD/Loop was the highest (96 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 84 percent in Pulwama<br />

district and the lowest (eight percent) in Badgam district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />

The extent of knowledge among eligible women about Pills was the highest (96 percent) in Baramula<br />

district, followed by 95 percent in Kargil and Leh districts and the lowest (17 percent) in Kathua<br />

district, while it was 63 percent for the state. The extent of knowledge among eligible women about<br />

condom was the highest (94 percent) in Doda district, followed by 87 percent in Pulwama district<br />

and the lowest (10 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 67 method percent for the state. Further,<br />

the extent of knowledge among eligible women about any traditional method was the highest (54<br />

percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 29 percent in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Baramula district, while it was 19 percent for the state.<br />

6.1.2 Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV)<br />

Table 6.3 gives percentage of husbands having knowledge of no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) by<br />

residence and availability of health facility in the village. Only 12 percent of the husbands had<br />

knowledge of NSV in the state – 11 percent in rural areas and 15 percent in urban areas. The<br />

percentage of husbands who had knowledge of NSV was eight percent for husbands living in<br />

villages having no health facility in the village as against 12 percent for husband living in villages<br />

having health facility in the village. The percentage of husbands who said that NSV is simpler than<br />

conventional vasectomy was 71 percent in the state – 66 percent in rural areas and 83 percent in<br />

urban areas. The percentage of husbands who said that NSV does not lead to any complication was<br />

71 percent in the state – 70 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />

of husbands who said that NSV does not affect man’s sexual performance was 54 percent in the<br />

state – 58 percent in rural areas and 44 percent in urban areas. Sixty-three percent of the husbands<br />

living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 56 percent of husbands living<br />

in villages having health facility in the village said that NSV does not affect sexual performance.<br />

Table 6.3 KNOWLEDGE OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY (NSV)<br />

Husbands knowledge of NSV by residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Knowledge of NSV<br />

Percentage of husband who had knowledge about NSV<br />

Total<br />

12.2<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility in the village 1<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

11.1<br />

15.4<br />

8.2<br />

12.2<br />

Number of husbands<br />

10,239<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

2,067<br />

5,734<br />

Who know that NSV is simpler than conventional vasectomy<br />

71.0<br />

66.0<br />

82.7<br />

71.6<br />

64.6<br />

Who feel that NSV does not lead to any complication<br />

71.1<br />

69.8<br />

74.1<br />

76.0<br />

68.3<br />

Who feel that NSV does not affect man’s sexual performance<br />

53.6<br />

57.7<br />

44.2<br />

62.6<br />

56.5<br />

Number of husbands<br />

1,245<br />

868<br />

377<br />

171<br />

698<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village.<br />

6.1.3 Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 6.4 gives percentage of husband of eligible women by knowledge of NSV by district in the<br />

100


Table 6.4 NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of husband of eligible women by knowledge of NSV by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Knowledge about<br />

NSV<br />

NSV is simpler than<br />

conventional method<br />

Who reported NSV does<br />

not lead to any<br />

complication<br />

Who reported NSV does not<br />

affect man’s sexual<br />

performance<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

9.9<br />

24.7<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

17.0<br />

81.0<br />

70.4<br />

42.0<br />

0.0<br />

68.3<br />

42.0<br />

68.2<br />

42.0<br />

100.0<br />

67.7<br />

37.6<br />

42.8<br />

100.0<br />

0.0<br />

44.8<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

26.6<br />

14.3<br />

8.9<br />

37.1<br />

10.0<br />

37.0<br />

89.6<br />

88.5<br />

62.5<br />

87.7<br />

27.7<br />

92.1<br />

62.1<br />

39.6<br />

63.5<br />

42.4<br />

84.8<br />

13.3<br />

47.8<br />

13.7<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

19.5<br />

0.1<br />

24.8<br />

3.3<br />

23.4<br />

100.0<br />

70.8<br />

64.9<br />

72.8<br />

100.0<br />

88.0<br />

82.4<br />

22.0<br />

0.0<br />

85.0<br />

18.1<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

12.2<br />

71.0<br />

71.1<br />

53.6<br />

state. The percentage of husbands having knowledge about NSV was the highest (37 percent) in<br />

Leh district, followed by 27 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />

Baramula, Doda and Rajouri districts, while it was 12 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />

husbands who know NSV is simpler than conventional method was the highest (100 percent) in<br />

Rajouri district, followed by 90 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />

district, while it was 71 percent for the state. The percentage of husbands who know about NSV and<br />

reported that it does not lead to any complications was the highest (100 percent) in Doda and<br />

Rajouri districts, followed by 92 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (28 percent) in Kargil<br />

district, while it was 71 percent for the state. The percentage of husbands who reported that NSV<br />

does not affect a man’s sexual performance was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district,<br />

followed by 85 percent in Kathua and Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />

district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />

6.2 Current use of Family Planning Methods<br />

Table 6.5 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years currently using any<br />

contraceptive method by selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of<br />

women using any modern method was 52 percent in the state – 49 percent in rural areas and 62<br />

percent in urban areas. The current use of modern methods is four points up from Round-I. Use of<br />

modern method was reported by 52 percent of the women – 25 percent any modern spacing method<br />

and 27 percent any sterilization method. The most preferred among the users of sterilization<br />

methods was female sterilization by 25 percent women and male sterilization by two percent males.<br />

The use of any traditional method was three percent in the state – one percent women were using<br />

Rhythm/periodic abstinence method and two percent women were using withdrawal method.<br />

Figure 6.2 shows practice of family planning methods.<br />

Current use of contraception was 57 percent for scheduled caste women and also women<br />

from other castes as against 31 percent for scheduled tribe women, while it was 48 percent for<br />

OBC women. The current use of contraception was 51 percent for women living in villages<br />

101


Table 6.5 CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATE<br />

Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years currently using any contraceptive method by selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Method<br />

Any<br />

method<br />

Any<br />

modern 1<br />

method<br />

Any modern<br />

spacing<br />

method 2<br />

Any<br />

sterilization<br />

Male<br />

sterilization<br />

Female<br />

sterilization<br />

IUD/<br />

Loop<br />

Pill<br />

Condom<br />

/ Nirodh<br />

Any<br />

traditional<br />

method 3<br />

Rhythm<br />

/periodic<br />

abstinence<br />

Withdrawal<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

50.9<br />

67.1<br />

48.7<br />

62.4<br />

20.7<br />

38.4<br />

27.9<br />

24.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.3<br />

26.1<br />

22.7<br />

2.1<br />

3.5<br />

4.3<br />

4.9<br />

14.3<br />

30.0<br />

2.2<br />

4.9<br />

0.4<br />

1.7<br />

1.8<br />

3.2<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years & above<br />

51.3<br />

59.3<br />

60.4<br />

49.0<br />

56.0<br />

56.8<br />

17.0<br />

33.8<br />

39.5<br />

31.9<br />

22.1<br />

17.3<br />

1.6<br />

1.6<br />

2.0<br />

30.3<br />

20.5<br />

15.3<br />

1.8<br />

2.7<br />

3.9<br />

4.5<br />

4.3<br />

4.7<br />

10.7<br />

26.8<br />

30.9<br />

2.3<br />

3.5<br />

3.7<br />

0.3<br />

1.5<br />

1.1<br />

2.0<br />

2.0<br />

2.6<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

63.3<br />

48.6<br />

66.8<br />

91.4<br />

(74.4)<br />

59.6<br />

46.3<br />

63.8<br />

90.0<br />

(71.8)<br />

41.0<br />

14.3<br />

37.5<br />

73.9<br />

(38.5)<br />

18.5<br />

32.0<br />

26.3<br />

16.1<br />

(30.8)<br />

1.6<br />

1.8<br />

0.4<br />

0.6<br />

(0.0)<br />

16.9<br />

30.1<br />

25.9<br />

15.5<br />

(30.8)<br />

3.4<br />

1.0<br />

8.0<br />

35.0<br />

(5.1)<br />

3.1<br />

4.8<br />

6.7<br />

24.8<br />

(5.1)<br />

34.6<br />

8.4<br />

22.9<br />

14.1<br />

(28.2)<br />

3.6<br />

2.4<br />

3.0<br />

1.4<br />

(2.6)<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.8<br />

0.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

2.6<br />

1.9<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

(2.6)<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

59.6<br />

31.7<br />

49.3<br />

60.5<br />

57.2<br />

30.8<br />

47.7<br />

56.8<br />

34.7<br />

18.9<br />

17.5<br />

26.3<br />

22.2<br />

11.8<br />

30.1<br />

30.5<br />

1.4<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

2.0<br />

20.9<br />

11.0<br />

28.9<br />

28.5<br />

4.1<br />

4.1<br />

1.1<br />

2.1<br />

2.1<br />

7.4<br />

5.4<br />

4.1<br />

28.5<br />

7.4<br />

11.1<br />

20.0<br />

2.2<br />

1.0<br />

1.6<br />

3.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.7<br />

0.9<br />

1.6<br />

2.7<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

41.1<br />

53.3<br />

67.8<br />

39.7<br />

51.2<br />

62.6<br />

13.6<br />

21.1<br />

40.5<br />

26.0<br />

30.0<br />

22.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.7<br />

2.6<br />

25.6<br />

28.3<br />

19.4<br />

1.1<br />

2.4<br />

3.4<br />

2.4<br />

4.9<br />

5.3<br />

10.1<br />

13.8<br />

31.8<br />

1.3<br />

2.1<br />

5.2<br />

0.2<br />

0.4<br />

1.6<br />

1.1<br />

1.8<br />

3.6<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

Availability of health facility<br />

in the village4<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

45.2<br />

53.0<br />

43.0<br />

50.7<br />

17.6<br />

21.9<br />

25.3<br />

28.8<br />

1.9<br />

1.8<br />

23.4<br />

27.0<br />

1.6<br />

2.2<br />

4.3<br />

4.4<br />

11.8<br />

15.2<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.4<br />

1.9<br />

1.7<br />

2,086<br />

5,765<br />

Total<br />

54.8<br />

51.9<br />

24.9<br />

26.9<br />

1.7<br />

25.3<br />

2.4<br />

4.5<br />

18.1<br />

2.8<br />

0.7<br />

2.1<br />

10,308<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

1<br />

. Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom. 2. Include IUD, Pills and Condom. 3 . Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method. @<br />

Literate women with no years of schooling are also included. #Total figure may not add to N due to don’t know and missing cases. 4 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health<br />

centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

102


Figure 6.2<br />

Practice of Family Planning Methods<br />

Pills<br />

5%<br />

IUD<br />

2%<br />

Condom<br />

18%<br />

Male sterilization<br />

2%<br />

Not using any method<br />

45%<br />

Female sterilization<br />

25%<br />

Note: Total percent may add more<br />

than 100.0 due to rounding Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Any tradional<br />

method/other method<br />

3%<br />

having health facility in the village as against 43 percent for women living in villages having no<br />

health facility in the village. The current use of contraception was 49 percent for non-literate<br />

women as against about 57 percent for literate women. The current contraceptive use was the highest<br />

(63 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (40 percent) for women with low SLI,<br />

while it was 51 percent for women with medium SLI. The current use of contraception was 60<br />

percent for Hindu women as against 46 percent for Muslim women, 64 percent for Sikh women<br />

and 90 percent for Buddhist women, while it was 72 percent for other women. Further, current<br />

use of any spacing method was 21 percent in rural areas as against 38 percent in urban areas. The<br />

use of any spacing methods was the highest (39 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years<br />

and above and the lowest (17 percent) for non-literate women, while it was 34 percent for<br />

women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, use of any spacing method was the highest (40<br />

percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (14 percent) for women with low SLI, while it<br />

was 21 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />

The use of female sterilization was 26 percent in rural areas as against 23 percent in urban<br />

areas. The use of female sterilization was 17 percent for Hindu women as against 30 percent for<br />

Muslim women, 26 percent for Sikh women and 31 percent for other women, while it was the<br />

lowest (15 percent) for Buddhist women. The use of female sterilization was 21 percent for scheduled<br />

caste women as against 11 percent for scheduled tribe women, while it was 29 percent for OBC<br />

and other caste women. The use of female sterilization was 23 percent for women living in villages<br />

having no health facility in the village as against 27 percent for women living in villages having<br />

health facility in the village. The use of female sterilization was the highest (30 percent) for nonliterate<br />

women and the lowest (15 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above,<br />

while it was over 20 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, use of female<br />

sterilization was the highest (28 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (19<br />

percent) for women with high SLI, while it was 26 percent for women with low SLI.<br />

6.2.1 Current Use of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 6.6 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years currently using any<br />

103


Table 6.6 CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATES BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years currently using any contraceptive method by district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Any<br />

method<br />

Any<br />

modern 1<br />

method<br />

Any modern<br />

spacing 2<br />

method<br />

Male<br />

sterilization<br />

Female<br />

sterilization<br />

IUD<br />

Pill<br />

Condom/<br />

Nirodh<br />

Any<br />

traditional 3<br />

method<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

78.1<br />

40.8<br />

32.5<br />

16.4<br />

73.2<br />

77.6<br />

35.8<br />

32.5<br />

16.2<br />

69.7<br />

20.1<br />

2.3<br />

5.9<br />

8.4<br />

55.7<br />

(0.4)<br />

(0.9)<br />

(0.5)<br />

(0.4)<br />

(2.1)<br />

57.1<br />

32.2<br />

26.0<br />

7.5<br />

11.5<br />

(1.7)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(2.2)<br />

(1.3)<br />

(5.4)<br />

4.8<br />

(0.0)<br />

3.4<br />

(1.6)<br />

4.2<br />

13.6<br />

(2.3)<br />

(0.3)<br />

5.5<br />

46.1<br />

(0.5)<br />

(4.9)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.1)<br />

3.5<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

86.6<br />

48.4<br />

71.1<br />

90.7<br />

72.0<br />

83.4<br />

45.6<br />

64.4<br />

90.5<br />

65.1<br />

53.9<br />

14.2<br />

16.3<br />

75.6<br />

16.7<br />

(0.3)<br />

(0.8)<br />

5.2<br />

(0.5)<br />

6.1<br />

29.2<br />

30.6<br />

42.8<br />

14.4<br />

42.2<br />

10.6<br />

(0.9)<br />

(0.8)<br />

39.2<br />

(0.5)<br />

30.7<br />

(0.8)<br />

11.6<br />

23.3<br />

11.9<br />

12.6<br />

12.5<br />

3.9<br />

13.1<br />

4.3<br />

(3.2)<br />

(2.8)<br />

6.7<br />

(0.2)<br />

6.9<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

51.8<br />

22.7<br />

45.5<br />

55.1<br />

51.5<br />

22.6<br />

41.7<br />

50.9<br />

5.4<br />

6.9<br />

27.3<br />

34.0<br />

(0.3)<br />

(0.2)<br />

(3.0)<br />

(1.4)<br />

45.7<br />

15.6<br />

11.4<br />

15.4<br />

(0.4)<br />

(0.8)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(1.5)<br />

(0.8)<br />

(1.5)<br />

6.0<br />

(2.5)<br />

4.2<br />

4.6<br />

21.3<br />

30.0<br />

(0.3)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(3.8)<br />

3.7<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

54.8<br />

51.9<br />

24.9<br />

1.7<br />

25.3<br />

2.4<br />

4.5<br />

18.1<br />

2.8<br />

1<br />

Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom 2 Include IUD, Pills and Condom<br />

3<br />

Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method. ( ) Based on less than 25 cases<br />

contraceptive method by district. The percentage of eligible women using any contraceptive<br />

method was the highest (91 percent) in Leh district, followed by 87 percent in Kargil district and<br />

the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district, while it was 55 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />

eligible women using any modern contraceptive method was the highest (90 percent) in Leh district,<br />

followed by 83 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district, while it 52<br />

percent for the state. The percentage of eligible women using any modern spacing method was the<br />

highest (76 percent) in Leh district, followed by 56 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (over<br />

two percent) in Badgam district, while it was 25 percent for the state. The use of male sterilization<br />

was higher than that of the state (two percent) in Jammu, Kupwara, Pulwama and Srinagar<br />

districts and in the remaining 10 districts it was lower than that of the state. The percentage of eligible<br />

women using female sterilization was the highest (57 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by<br />

46 percent in Poonch district and the lowest (over seven percent) in Doda district, while it was 25<br />

percent for the state.<br />

Further, use of IUD/Loop among the eligible women was the highest (39 percent) in Leh<br />

district, followed by 11 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam and<br />

Srinagar districts. The use of Pills among the eligible women was the highest (31 percent) in Kargil<br />

district, followed by 23 percent in Leh district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam district,<br />

while it was over four percent for the state. The use of condom/nirodh was the highest (46 percent)<br />

in Jammu district, followed by 30 percent in Udhampur district and the lowest (less than one<br />

percent) in Badgam district, while it was 18 percent for the state (see Map-6).<br />

6.2.2 Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Women<br />

Table 6.7 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years by current use and<br />

ever use of contraception by selected demographic characteristics in the state. The percentage of<br />

1<strong>04</strong>


Table 6.7 USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY WOMEN<br />

Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years by current use and ever use of contraception according to selected<br />

demographic characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Demographic<br />

Characteristic<br />

Any modern<br />

method 1<br />

Percentage of women/husbands using<br />

Any<br />

traditionalmethod 2<br />

Any<br />

method<br />

Percentage of women / husbands<br />

by contraceptive status<br />

Not using<br />

any method Ever used Never used<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Age-group<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

7.2<br />

23.5<br />

41.5<br />

54.0<br />

64.9<br />

59.1<br />

0.0<br />

1.3<br />

2.7<br />

2.6<br />

2.6<br />

4.4<br />

7.2<br />

24.8<br />

44.0<br />

56.7<br />

67.7<br />

63.6<br />

92.8<br />

74.6<br />

55.7<br />

43.1<br />

32.2<br />

36.4<br />

12.8<br />

33.6<br />

49.5<br />

62.6<br />

72.0<br />

67.5<br />

87.2<br />

65.0<br />

49.2<br />

36.9<br />

27.3<br />

31.9<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

Surviving children<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3 or more<br />

6.8<br />

37.2<br />

58.1<br />

61.2<br />

1.1<br />

2.7<br />

3.1<br />

3.0<br />

7.9<br />

39.9<br />

61.1<br />

64.3<br />

91.8<br />

59.6<br />

38.8<br />

35.5<br />

15.1<br />

49.8<br />

67.7<br />

67.0<br />

84.2<br />

48.9<br />

31.2<br />

32.5<br />

871<br />

1,637<br />

2,922<br />

4,879<br />

Surviving sons<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 or more<br />

28.0<br />

55.8<br />

61.3<br />

2.6<br />

2.9<br />

2.8<br />

30.6<br />

58.7<br />

64.1<br />

69.1<br />

41.0<br />

35.8<br />

38.8<br />

64.2<br />

67.8<br />

60.3<br />

34.8<br />

31.6<br />

2,260<br />

3,839<br />

4,209<br />

Surviving daughters<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 or more<br />

38.1<br />

59.1<br />

57.5<br />

2.6<br />

2.9<br />

2.9<br />

40.7<br />

62.0<br />

60.5<br />

59.1<br />

37.9<br />

39.3<br />

48.4<br />

66.3<br />

64.5<br />

50.7<br />

32.8<br />

34.8<br />

3,269<br />

3,879<br />

3,160<br />

All women<br />

51.9<br />

2.8<br />

54.8<br />

45.0<br />

60.1<br />

39.1<br />

10,308<br />

1<br />

Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom.<br />

2<br />

Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method.<br />

currently married women using any modern method was seven percent in the age group 15-19 years,<br />

23 percent in the age group 20-24 years, 41 percent in the age group 25-29 years, 54 percent in the<br />

age group 30-34 years, 65 percent in the age group 35-39 years, which declines to 59 percent in the<br />

age group 40-44 years. These data have shown that use of contraception increases with increase in<br />

age of the women, and it attains it a peak at 65 percent in the age group 35-39 years and declines<br />

thereafter to 59 percent in the age group 40-44 years. The use of any traditional method was the<br />

lowest (zero percent) in the age group 15-19 years and the highest (over four percent) in the age<br />

group 40-44 years. However, percentage of never users was 87 percent in the age group 15-19 years,<br />

which steadily declines to 27 percent in the age group 35-39 years and increases to 32 percent in the<br />

age group 40-44 years.<br />

It is crucial to understand the association between the number of living children and<br />

contraceptive use. The contraceptive use is high among the women who have three or more surviving<br />

children invariably of methods in the state. The percentage of women having never used any<br />

method of contraception was 84 percent for the women having no surviving children, 49 percent<br />

for women having one surviving child, 31 percent for women having two surviving children and 32<br />

percent for women having three or more surviving children. These data show that percentage of<br />

women who have never used contraception decreases with increase in the number of surviving children.<br />

In other words, percentage of women currently using contraception increases with increase in the<br />

number of surviving children.<br />

105


Further, percentage of women never using contraception was 60 percent for women<br />

having no surviving sons as against 51 percent women having no surviving daughters. On the<br />

other hand, 61 percent women having two or more surviving sons as against 57 percent women<br />

having two or more surviving daughter were currently using contraception. The lower level of<br />

contraception among women having no surviving sons than those women having no surviving<br />

daughters is perhaps due to desire to have a male progeny.<br />

6.2.3 Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods as Reported by Husbands<br />

Table 6.8 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women by current use and<br />

ever used of contraception by selected demographic variables in the state. The current use of any<br />

method of contraception among the husbands was 21 percent in the age group below 25 years, 39<br />

percent in the age group 25-34 years, 55 percent in the age group 35-44 years and 56 percent in<br />

the age group 45 years and above. These data have shown that use of contraception increases<br />

steadily with increases in the age of husband.<br />

Table 6.8 USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY MEN<br />

Percentage of husband of currently married women by current use and ever use of contraception by selected demographic<br />

variables, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />

Demographic<br />

Percentage of husbands/women using<br />

Characteristics<br />

Any modern method 1 Any traditional method 2 Any method Not using any method<br />

Number of men<br />

Age-group<br />


37 percent husbands having no surviving daughters. Similarly, use of contraception among<br />

husbands was 56 percent for husbands having two or more surviving sons as against 54 percent<br />

husbands having two or more surviving daughters. The lower level of contraception among husbands<br />

having no surviving sons is perhaps due to their desire to have a male progeny.<br />

6.3 Reasons for Not Using Male Methods<br />

The DLHS-RCH asked husbands of currently married women about the contraceptive methods that<br />

he or his wife was using currently. The husbands who were not using male methods were further<br />

asked the reasons for it. Table 6.9 gives percentage of husbands with their choice of family planning<br />

methods and reasons for not using male methods by residence in the state. The percentage of<br />

husbands who reported female methods was 54 percent in the state – 59 percent in rural areas<br />

and 44 percent in urban areas. The reasons given for not preferring the male methods were ‘fear<br />

of impotency’ (six percent), ‘lack of sexual pleasure’ (five percent), ‘fear of method failure’ (five<br />

percent), ‘fear of operation’ (13 percent), ‘fear of weakness’ (29 percent) and ‘female methods<br />

are more popular’ (65 percent). The main reasons for not using male methods are ‘fear of operation’<br />

and ‘fear of weakness’.<br />

Table 6.9 REASONS FOR NOT USING MALE METHODS<br />

Percentage of husbands with their choice of family planning methods and reasons for not accepting male methods according to<br />

residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Female method users and reason for not accepting male methods<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Percentage of husband who have reported female methods<br />

54.4<br />

59.0<br />

44.2<br />

Number of men<br />

5,378<br />

3,713<br />

1,665<br />

Reasons for not accepting male methods*<br />

Fear of impotency<br />

Lack of sexual pleasure<br />

Fear of method failure<br />

Fear of operation<br />

Fear of weakness<br />

Female methods are more popular<br />

Other<br />

5.6<br />

5.2<br />

5.1<br />

12.8<br />

28.8<br />

65.2<br />

5.1<br />

5.2<br />

4.9<br />

4.5<br />

12.2<br />

28.4<br />

65.6<br />

4.9<br />

6.7<br />

6.1<br />

6.8<br />

14.7<br />

29.9<br />

63.8<br />

5.6<br />

Number of men<br />

2,927<br />

* Percentages may add to more than 100.0 because multiple responses could be recorded.<br />

2,191<br />

736<br />

6.4 Source of Contraceptive Methods<br />

Table 6.10 gives percent distribution of current users of modern contraceptive methods by<br />

method and source of supply in the state. These services are provided by government health<br />

institutions, private hospitals and clinics, as well as by non-government organisations (NGOs). The<br />

data shows that 88 percent female sterilizations were performed at the government health facility, 11<br />

percent at the private health facility and the remaining at other health facility. Similarly, 85 percent<br />

of male sterilizations were performed at the government health facility, 11 percent at the private<br />

health facility and the remaining at other health facility. More than 90 percent sterilization operations<br />

performed at the government health institutions were performed at the ‘Government/Municipal<br />

hospitals’. Among the IUD/Loop users, 45 percent reported the source as government/municipal<br />

hospital and 25 percent from the CHC/PHC and six percent from FP/RCH camp and sub-centre.<br />

Sixty-four percent of the acceptors received their supplies and services from government health<br />

107


facility, eight percent from private health facility and 24 percent from chemist and others. Figure<br />

6.3 gives source of family planning among current users of modern contraceptive methods.<br />

Figure 6.3<br />

Source of Family Planning Among Current<br />

Users of Modern Contraceptive Methods<br />

Other<br />

1%<br />

Don't<br />

know/missing<br />

3%<br />

Chemist<br />

23%<br />

Private<br />

8%<br />

Government<br />

64%<br />

Note: Total percent may add more<br />

than 100.0 due to rounding<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Table 6.10 SOURCE OF MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS<br />

Percent distribution of current users of modern contraceptive methods by method and source of supply, Jammu &<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Source<br />

Government medical centre<br />

Government/Municipal hospital<br />

CHC/PHC<br />

Sub-centre<br />

Government doctor<br />

Government nurse/ ANM<br />

Family planning/RCH camp<br />

Mobile clinic<br />

Female<br />

sterilization<br />

87.6<br />

77.4<br />

2.8<br />

1.8<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

4.8<br />

0.5<br />

Male<br />

sterilization<br />

Contraceptive method<br />

85.4<br />

67.6<br />

8.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.1<br />

8.4<br />

0.0<br />

IUD/<br />

Loop<br />

76.2<br />

45.0<br />

25.0<br />

0.7<br />

3.4<br />

0.6<br />

1.5<br />

0.0<br />

Pills<br />

44.6<br />

23.0<br />

11.9<br />

4.7<br />

0.2<br />

0.7<br />

3.1<br />

0.9<br />

Condom<br />

/ Nirodh<br />

31.6<br />

18.9<br />

5.2<br />

4.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.8<br />

0.2<br />

All modern<br />

methods 1<br />

63.8<br />

50.5<br />

5.6<br />

2.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.3<br />

3.6<br />

0.4<br />

Private medical centre<br />

Private hospital<br />

Private doctor<br />

Private nurse<br />

10.6<br />

7.8<br />

2.8<br />

0.1<br />

10.6<br />

6.0<br />

4.5<br />

0.0<br />

20.4<br />

8.6<br />

8.4<br />

3.4<br />

5.4<br />

0.9<br />

4.5<br />

0.0<br />

3.1<br />

1.1<br />

1.5<br />

0.5<br />

8.0<br />

4.8<br />

2.8<br />

0.4<br />

Chemist<br />

Other<br />

Do not know<br />

Missing<br />

NA<br />

1.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

NA<br />

2.4<br />

1.6<br />

0.0<br />

NA<br />

3.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.4<br />

47.5<br />

1.5<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

55.5<br />

0.9<br />

7.5<br />

1.3<br />

23.4<br />

1.4<br />

2.8<br />

0.6<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of users<br />

2,603<br />

174 248 463 1,861 5,349<br />

1<br />

Includes female sterilization, male sterilization, IUD, Pills or condom. CHC: Community health centre, PHC: Primary<br />

health centre. NA: Not applicable.<br />

6.5 Problems with Current Use of Contraceptive Methods<br />

Women who were using a modern contraceptive method were asked if they had experienced any<br />

108


problems related with the current methods they are using. Table 6.11 gives percentage of women<br />

informed about side effects, had side effects with the method by use of method in the state.<br />

The percentage of women who were informed about all the available methods was 52 percent in<br />

the state. The percentage of women who were informed about the side effects before adoption was 43<br />

percent for female sterilization, 50 percent for IUD/Loop and 53 percent for Pills. Further, percentage<br />

of women who had side effect/health problem due to use of method was 12 percent for female<br />

sterilization, 12 percent for IUD/Loop and over three percent for Pills. The most common health<br />

problems experienced by sterilized women ‘weakness/inability to work’ (51 percent), ‘body ache/<br />

backache’ (86 percent), ‘cramps’ four percent), ‘weight gain’ (14 percent), ‘dizziness’ (one percent),<br />

nausea/vomiting’ (less than one percent), ‘breast tenderness’ (one percent), ‘irregular periods’ (three<br />

percent), ‘excessive bleeding’ (over two percent), ‘spotting’ (less than one percent) and ‘white<br />

discharge’ (one percent). Similarly, most common health problems experienced by IUD/Loop users<br />

were ‘weakness/inability to work’ (32 percent), ‘body ache/backache’ (42 percent), ‘weight gain’ (21<br />

percent), ‘dizziness’ (26 percent), ‘nausea/vomiting’ (five percent), ‘irregular periods’ (five percent)<br />

and ‘excessive bleeding’ (five percent).<br />

Table 6.11 HEALTH PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT USE OF CONTRACEPTION<br />

Percentage of women informed about side effects, had side effects with the method by use of method, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> problems/side effect<br />

Type of method<br />

Female sterilizations IUD/loop Pill<br />

Women who were informed about all the available methods<br />

51.9<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Women who were informed about the side effects before adoption of the method<br />

43.4<br />

50.2<br />

53.2<br />

Women who had side effect/health problem due to use of contraceptive method<br />

12.2<br />

11.8<br />

3.3<br />

Number of current users<br />

2,603<br />

248<br />

463<br />

Type of health problems/side effects 1<br />

Weakness/inability to work<br />

Body ache/ backache<br />

Cramps<br />

Weight gain<br />

Dizziness<br />

Nausea/vomiting<br />

Breast tenderness<br />

Irregular periods<br />

Excessive bleeding<br />

Spotting<br />

White discharge<br />

Other<br />

51.3<br />

86.0<br />

3.9<br />

14.0<br />

0.7<br />

0.3<br />

0.9<br />

2.7<br />

2.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.9<br />

0.6<br />

(31.6)<br />

(42.1)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(21.1)<br />

(26.3)<br />

(5.3)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(5.3)<br />

(5.3)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.0)<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Number of users with side effects<br />

317<br />

29<br />

15<br />

1<br />

Percentages may add to more than 100.0 because multiple problems could be recorded.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases. * Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />

6.6 Treatment for <strong>Health</strong> Problems with Current Use of Contraception<br />

Table 6.12 gives percentage of women who had side effects and sought treatment, follow-up<br />

and satisfaction with the method by use of method in the state. The percentage of women who had<br />

follow-up visit by health worker after adoption of the method was 11 percent for female sterilization<br />

users, 16 percent for IUD/Loop users and eight percent for Pills users. Further, percentage of women<br />

who were satisfied with method of current use was 94 percent for female sterilization users, 90<br />

percent for IUD/Loop users and 94 percent for Pills users. The percentage of women who sought<br />

109


Table 6.12 FOLLOW-UP VISIT AND SOUGHT TREATMENT FOR HEALTH PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT USE OF<br />

CONTRACEPTION<br />

Percentage of women who had follow-up visit, satisfaction with the method of current use and sought treatment of side effects due<br />

to use of method, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> problems/side effect<br />

Type of method<br />

Female sterilizations IUD/loop Pill<br />

Women who had follow up visit by health worker after adoption of method<br />

10.7<br />

16.0<br />

7.6<br />

Women who are satisfied with method of current use<br />

93.6<br />

90.3<br />

94.4<br />

Number of current users<br />

2,603<br />

248<br />

463<br />

Women who sought treatment for the health problem<br />

85.3<br />

(73.7)<br />

*<br />

Number of women with side effects<br />

317<br />

29<br />

15<br />

Source of treatments<br />

Government health facility<br />

Government hospital/dispensary<br />

UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />

CHC/<strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />

PHC<br />

Sub-centre<br />

90.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

6.5<br />

1.4<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Private health facility<br />

Private hospital/clinic<br />

15.3<br />

*<br />

*<br />

ISM health facility 1<br />

Chemist/Medical shop<br />

Home remedy<br />

9.7<br />

6.8<br />

1.6<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Number of women with side effects<br />

270<br />

24<br />

12<br />

1<br />

Either government or Private. * Percentages not shown: based on very few cases. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

treatment for the health problem was 85 percent for female sterilization users, 74 percent for<br />

IUD/Loop users, while none of the Pills users sought treatment of their health problem.<br />

The percentage of women using female sterilization who sought treatment for contraceptive<br />

use related problems from government health facility was 100 percent, from private health facility<br />

15 percent, from ISM facility 10 percent and seven percent from chemist/medical shop, while two<br />

percent women tried home remedy. In other words, one-third of the women sought treatment of<br />

their problems from more than one health facility. However, none of the IUD/Loop and Pills users,<br />

who experienced contraceptive use related problem, sought treatment of health problem.<br />

6.7 Advice to Non-Users to Use Contraception<br />

Table 6.13 gives percentage of current non-users who were advised by the ANM/health worker to<br />

use contraception by suggested method according to place of residence and availability of health<br />

facility in the village in the state. The percentage of currently non-users advised by ANM/health<br />

worker to use contraceptive method was six percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and<br />

seven percent in urban areas. The percentage of current non-users advised by ANM/health worker<br />

to use contraceptive method was three percent for the non-users living in villages having no health<br />

facility in the village as against seven percent for the non-users living in villages having health<br />

facility in the village. The percentage of women who were advised to use contraception were advised<br />

female sterilization (41 percent), male sterilization (22 percent), IUD/Loop (10 percent), Pills (12<br />

percent) and condom/nirodh (eight percent). The rural-urban differential in the contraceptive methods<br />

advised to women is apparent for all the methods.<br />

110


Table 6.13 ADVICE ON CONTRACEPTIVE USE<br />

Percentage of current non-users* who were advised by the ANM/health worker to use contraception by suggested method<br />

according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Advise/future intension to use<br />

Percentage of current non-users advised by ANM/ health<br />

worker to use of contraceptive method<br />

Total<br />

5.9<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility in the village 1<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

5.6<br />

7.3<br />

3.1<br />

6.6<br />

Number of non-users<br />

4,306<br />

3,558<br />

749<br />

1,056<br />

2,502<br />

Percent distribution of women who were advised by method<br />

Female sterilization<br />

Male sterilization<br />

IUD/loop<br />

Pill<br />

Condom/Nirodh<br />

Rhythmic /periodic abstinence<br />

Missing<br />

41.0<br />

22.5<br />

9.7<br />

11.6<br />

8.0<br />

0.8<br />

6.3<br />

46.5<br />

21.5<br />

7.7<br />

14.3<br />

3.6<br />

1.0<br />

5.4<br />

21.2<br />

26.2<br />

17.1<br />

1.8<br />

23.8<br />

0.0<br />

9.9<br />

(42.3)<br />

(11.5)<br />

(15.4)<br />

(15.4)<br />

(7.7)<br />

(3.8)<br />

(3.8)<br />

48.1<br />

24.1<br />

6.4<br />

13.4<br />

2.9<br />

0.8<br />

4.4<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of non-users<br />

252<br />

198 55<br />

32<br />

* Exclude women in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village. ( ) Based on les than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

165<br />

6.7.1 Future Intentions<br />

Table 6.14 gives percentage of current non-users who intended to use contraception in future by<br />

preferred method by residence in the state. The percentage of women who intend to use<br />

contraceptive in future was 15 percent in the state irrespective of place of residence. Similarly,<br />

percentage of husbands who intend to use contraceptive in future was 15 percent in the state - 14<br />

percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas.<br />

Table 6.14 FUTURE INTENTION TO USE<br />

Percentage of current non-users* who were intended to use contraception in future by preferred method according to place of<br />

residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Future intention to use/method<br />

Percentage of respondents who intend to use<br />

contraceptive in future<br />

Women<br />

Husband<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

14.7<br />

14.7<br />

15.0<br />

14.9<br />

13.9<br />

20.2<br />

Number of non-users<br />

4,306<br />

3,558<br />

749<br />

4,797<br />

4,024<br />

772<br />

Percent distribution of non-user who were preferred to<br />

use family methods by preferred method<br />

Female sterilization<br />

Male sterilization<br />

IUD/copper-T/loop<br />

Oral pills<br />

Condom/Nirodh<br />

Rhythm/periodic abstinence<br />

Withdrawal<br />

Other<br />

Missing<br />

75.3<br />

4.7<br />

2.7<br />

3.5<br />

10.8<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0.1<br />

2.7<br />

75.4<br />

4.4<br />

2.5<br />

4.2<br />

9.9<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

3.2<br />

74.5<br />

6.0<br />

3.8<br />

0.0<br />

14.8<br />

0.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.5<br />

64.6<br />

7.8<br />

1.7<br />

1.0<br />

18.3<br />

0.8<br />

2.3<br />

1.7<br />

1.8<br />

67.9<br />

8.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

13.9<br />

0.8<br />

2.9<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

52.8<br />

5.3<br />

2.6<br />

0.0<br />

33.9<br />

1.0<br />

0.1<br />

2.6<br />

1.8<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of non-users<br />

611<br />

500<br />

111<br />

702<br />

548<br />

154<br />

* Exclude women who are in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />

111


Among the women who intended to use permanent methods of contraception, 75 percent<br />

preferred female sterilization as against five percent who preferred male sterilization. In case of<br />

temporary methods, the preferred methods by women were IUD/Loop (three percent), Oral pills<br />

(over three percent), condom/nirodh (11 percent), rhythm/periodic abstinence (less than one percent),<br />

withdrawal (less than one percent) and other (less than one percent).<br />

Among the husbands who intended to use contraception in the future, 65 percent preferred<br />

female sterilization as against eight percent who preferred male sterilization. In case of temporary<br />

methods, the preferred methods by husbands were IUD/Loop (two percent), Oral pills (one percent),<br />

condom/nirodh (18 percent), rhythm/periodic abstinence and withdrawal (less than one percent).<br />

The female sterilization appears to be the most preferred method for use in future both<br />

by women and men. Among the spacing methods, condom/nirodh appears to be the most preferred<br />

method for use in future both by men and women.<br />

6.7.2 Future Intention to Use Among Women by Number of Living Children<br />

Currently married women who were not using any contraceptive method at the time of survey<br />

were asked about their intentions to use a method in the future. Those women who intended to use<br />

contraceptives in the future were further asked about preferred methods. This type of information<br />

helps the managers and programmers to identify the potential groups of future users and to provide<br />

the type of contraceptives that are likely to be in demand. Table 6.15 gives the percentage<br />

distribution of currently married women who were not currently using ant contraceptive method<br />

by intention to use in future, according to number of living children and residence in the state.<br />

Among the current non-users, only four percent women intended to use contraception within the<br />

next 12 months; three percent women wanted to use within one to two years and eight percent<br />

women intended to use contraceptive method after two years. Over 54 percent women were not<br />

sure of their intention to use, while over 31 percent women do not intend to use contraception in<br />

future. Further, 59 percent of the women who have no living children said that they are yet to<br />

decide about the use of contraceptives.<br />

6.8 Reasons for Discontinuation and Non-Use of Contraception<br />

Currently married non-pregnant women who were not using any contraceptive method at the<br />

time of survey were categorised as past users and never users according to their contraceptive<br />

experience. In DLHS-RCH, women who had discontinued contraceptive use were asked about<br />

the main reason for discontinuation. And women who had never used contraceptives were asked<br />

about the main reason for not doing so. Table 6.16 gives percent distribution of women who were<br />

past users by reasons for discontinuation of the contraceptive method by place of residence in the<br />

state. The main reason for the discontinuation of contraception was ‘wanted child’ for 69 percent<br />

of the women in the state – 63 percent in rural areas and 84 percent in urban areas. Other reasons<br />

for discontinuation of contraception were ‘method failed/became pregnant’ (one percent), ‘weakness/<br />

inability to work’ (over one percent),‘body ache/backache’ (two percent),‘dizziness’ (over one percent),<br />

‘breast tenderness’ (five percent), ‘irregular periods’ (three percent), ‘spotting’ (one percent), ‘lack of<br />

pleasure’ (10 percent) and ‘method was inconvenient’ (two percent).<br />

112


Table 6.15 FUTURE USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY NUMBER OF LIVING CHILDREN<br />

Percent distribution of currently married women* who were not currently using any contraceptive method by intention to use in the<br />

future, according to number of living children and residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Intention to use in the future<br />

Intends to use in next 12 months<br />

One to two years<br />

More than two years<br />

Does not intend to use<br />

Not yet decided<br />

Missing<br />

1.3<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

35.7<br />

58.9<br />

0.2<br />

Number of living children<br />

0 1 2 3 4+<br />

2.2<br />

3.6<br />

10.5<br />

24.2<br />

59.1<br />

0.3<br />

Total<br />

4.0<br />

3.6<br />

9.0<br />

28.3<br />

55.1<br />

0.1<br />

4.8<br />

3.1<br />

8.4<br />

33.8<br />

49.9<br />

0.0<br />

6.2<br />

1.9<br />

9.2<br />

39.5<br />

43.2<br />

0.0<br />

Total<br />

3.6<br />

3.0<br />

8.0<br />

31.5<br />

53.7<br />

0.1<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

Intends to use in next 12 months<br />

One to two years<br />

More than two years<br />

Does not intend to use<br />

Not yet decided<br />

Missing<br />

751<br />

1.3<br />

2.3<br />

2.2<br />

33.7<br />

60.3<br />

0.2<br />

939<br />

1.7<br />

3.7<br />

10.5<br />

24.8<br />

59.0<br />

0.4<br />

1,067<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

2.6<br />

3.8<br />

9.0<br />

29.5<br />

55.1<br />

0.0<br />

845<br />

4.9<br />

2.8<br />

8.8<br />

32.8<br />

50.6<br />

0.0<br />

703<br />

5.8<br />

1.5<br />

10.1<br />

39.4<br />

43.1<br />

0.0<br />

4,306<br />

3.2<br />

2.9<br />

8.4<br />

31.6<br />

53.7<br />

0.1<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

Intends to use in next 12 months<br />

One to two years<br />

More than two years<br />

Does not intend to use<br />

Not yet decided<br />

Missing<br />

568<br />

1.3<br />

1.7<br />

0.6<br />

41.4<br />

54.9<br />

0.0<br />

740<br />

4.4<br />

3.6<br />

10.6<br />

22.0<br />

59.5<br />

0.0<br />

894<br />

Urban<br />

10.8<br />

2.5<br />

8.6<br />

22.3<br />

55.0<br />

0.8<br />

731<br />

3.9<br />

4.7<br />

5.8<br />

39.8<br />

45.6<br />

0.1<br />

624<br />

8.9<br />

4.7<br />

2.5<br />

39.7<br />

44.1<br />

0.0<br />

3,558<br />

5.5<br />

3.2<br />

6.1<br />

31.4<br />

53.6<br />

0.2<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

183<br />

199<br />

173<br />

* Exclude women who are in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />

115<br />

79<br />

749<br />

Table 6.16 REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION OF CONTRACEPTION<br />

Percent distribution of women who were past users (current non-users) by reason for discontinuation of the contraceptive method<br />

according to place of residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Reasons<br />

Reason for discontinuation<br />

Wanted child<br />

Method failed/became pregnant<br />

Supply not available<br />

Difficult to get method<br />

Weakness/inability to work<br />

Body ache/ Backache<br />

Cramps<br />

Dizziness<br />

Breast tenderness<br />

Irregular periods<br />

Spotting<br />

White discharge<br />

Lack of pleasure<br />

Method was inconvenient<br />

Other<br />

Missing<br />

Total percent<br />

Number of past users<br />

Total<br />

68.7<br />

0.7<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

1.5<br />

2.2<br />

0.3<br />

1.4<br />

5.2<br />

3.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

10.1<br />

1.9<br />

2.8<br />

0.7<br />

100.0<br />

553<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Place of residence<br />

63.1<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

3.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.9<br />

6.1<br />

3.4<br />

0.8<br />

0.3<br />

13.7<br />

0.7<br />

3.8<br />

1.0<br />

100.0<br />

407<br />

Urban<br />

84.2<br />

0.3<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.9<br />

2.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

100.0<br />

146<br />

113


6.8.1 Reasons for Not Using Contraceptive Methods<br />

Table 6.17 gives percentage of current non-users who were currently not using contraceptive<br />

method by reason according to place of residence in the state. The percentage of women and<br />

husbands who were currently not using any contraception reported main reasons for not using<br />

contraceptives were as ‘lack of knowledge about FP method’ (2-5 percent), ‘against the religion’<br />

(41-54 percent), ‘opposed to family planning’ (4-14 percent), ‘not like existing method’ (0-3<br />

percent), ‘afraid of sterilization’ (2-3 percent), ‘can not work after sterilization’ (0-2 percent),<br />

‘worry about side effects’ (8-13 percent), ‘cost too much’ (0-1 percent), ‘ health does not permit<br />

(0-1 percent), ‘inconvenient to use method’ (0-2 percent) and ‘difficult to become pregnant’ (3-7<br />

percent). <strong>Rural</strong>-urban differentials are serious in respect of ‘against the religion’, ‘opposed to<br />

family planning’ and ‘worry about side effects’.<br />

Table 6.17 REASON FOR NOT USING CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD<br />

Percentage of current non-users who were currently not using contraceptive method by reason according to place of residence,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Reason<br />

Lack of Knowledge about FP method<br />

Against the Religion<br />

Opposed to family planning<br />

Not like existing method<br />

Afraid of sterilization<br />

Can not work after sterilization<br />

Worry about side effects<br />

Costs too much<br />

<strong>Health</strong> does not permit<br />

Hard/inconvenient to get method<br />

Inconvenient to use method<br />

Difficult to become pregnant<br />

Wife is pregnant1<br />

Other<br />

Missing<br />

Women<br />

Husband*<br />

Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

4.9<br />

41.2<br />

13.9<br />

2.1<br />

2.1<br />

1.3<br />

12.2<br />

0.3<br />

1.0<br />

0.1<br />

1.3<br />

6.7<br />

-<br />

11.0<br />

1.9<br />

4.5<br />

44.2<br />

14.6<br />

2.5<br />

1.2<br />

1.3<br />

11.4<br />

0.1<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

5.2<br />

-<br />

11.6<br />

2.0<br />

7.0<br />

25.4<br />

10.0<br />

0.2<br />

6.6<br />

1.6<br />

16.8<br />

0.9<br />

2.5<br />

0.3<br />

5.3<br />

14.3<br />

-<br />

7.7<br />

1.4<br />

2.8<br />

53.6<br />

4.5<br />

0.1<br />

2.3<br />

0.0<br />

8.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.<br />

0.2<br />

3.6<br />

0.1<br />

1.2<br />

22.5<br />

2.8<br />

56.4<br />

4.4<br />

0.1<br />

2.5<br />

0.0<br />

8.2<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.6<br />

0.0<br />

1.1<br />

21.2<br />

2.6<br />

35.0<br />

5.1<br />

0.0<br />

1.5<br />

0.0<br />

10.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1.6<br />

10.1<br />

0.6<br />

1.2<br />

31.4<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of current non-users<br />

2,750<br />

2,311<br />

439<br />

1,839<br />

1,598<br />

241<br />

1<br />

Not applicable for women. * Excluding not decided cases on timing of next child.<br />

6.9 Unmet Need for Family Planning Services<br />

Unmet need for family planning is one of the indicators to assess the effectiveness of the family<br />

planning programme. Policy makers and family planning programme administrators use this to<br />

know the demand for family planning services/supplies. Unmet need is defined separately for<br />

limiting and spacing. Unmet need for spacing includes the proportion of currently married women<br />

who are neither in menopause nor had hysterectomy nor are currently pregnant and who want more<br />

children after two years or later and are currently not using any family planning method. The<br />

women who are not sure about whether and when to have next child, are also included in unmet<br />

need for spacing. The women who are not sure about the timing of the next child are also<br />

included in the unmet need for spacing. Unmet need for limiting includes the proportion of<br />

currently married women who are neither in menopause nor had hysterectomy nor are currently<br />

pregnant and do not want any more children but are currently not using any family planning<br />

method. Total unmet need refers to the totality of unmet for limiting and spacing.<br />

114


Table 6.18 gives percentage of currently married women with unmet need for family<br />

planning services by selected background characteristics. The unmet need for family planning<br />

was 25 percent in the state – 27 percent in rural areas and 17 percent in urban areas. Further,<br />

unmet need for spacing family was 14 percent in the state – 15 percent in rural areas and 11<br />

percent in urban areas. Similarly, unmet need for limiting family was 11 percent in the state – 12<br />

percent in rural areas and six percent in urban areas.<br />

Table 6.18 UNMET NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES<br />

Percentage of currently married women with unmet need for family planning services by selected background characteristics,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background Characteristic<br />

Age<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Illiterate<br />

0-9 @ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Others<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Others<br />

Number of living children<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4+<br />

Standard of living Index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

All women<br />

Unmet need for FP<br />

Spacing 1 Limiting 2 Total<br />

5.4<br />

20.9<br />

18.6<br />

16.2<br />

11.1<br />

5.4<br />

15.0<br />

11.0<br />

15.6<br />

11.9<br />

11.8<br />

8.8<br />

17.6<br />

7.7<br />

2.6<br />

(7.7)<br />

9.5<br />

8.6<br />

18.7<br />

14.8<br />

9.8<br />

18.6<br />

14.8<br />

11.0<br />

15.5<br />

10.3<br />

18.4<br />

8.9<br />

14.1<br />

16.8<br />

12.6<br />

8.3<br />

10.4<br />

9.6<br />

15.5<br />

12.2<br />

6.0<br />

12.9<br />

8.7<br />

6.2<br />

7.9<br />

12.8<br />

3.2<br />

0.6<br />

(5.1)<br />

9.4<br />

33.9<br />

10.7<br />

5.8<br />

14.4<br />

10.6<br />

9.1<br />

11.3<br />

10.7<br />

20.1<br />

10.0<br />

4.9<br />

10.7<br />

22.2<br />

33.5<br />

27.0<br />

26.6<br />

20.7<br />

21.0<br />

27.2<br />

17.0<br />

28.5<br />

20.6<br />

18.0<br />

16.7<br />

30.4<br />

10.9<br />

3.2<br />

(12.8)<br />

18.9<br />

42.5<br />

29.4<br />

20.6<br />

24.2<br />

29.2<br />

23.9<br />

22.3<br />

26.1<br />

30.4<br />

28.4<br />

13.8<br />

24.8<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

871<br />

1,637<br />

2,922<br />

2,750<br />

2,129<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

10,308<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

1<br />

Unmet need for spacing includes the proportion of currently married women who are neither in menopause or had<br />

hysterectomy nor are currently pregnant and who want more children after two years or later and are currently not using any<br />

family planning method. The women who are not sure about whether and when to have next child are also included in unmet<br />

need for spacing.<br />

2<br />

Unmet need for limiting includes the proportion of currently married women who are neither in menopause or had hysterectomy<br />

nor are currently pregnant and do not want any more children but are currently not using any family planning method. Total<br />

unmet need refers to unmet for limiting and spacing.<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included. # The total figure may not add to N due to do not know and<br />

missing cases. ( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

115


Unmet need for family planning was the highest (33 percent) for women aged 20-24 years,<br />

followed by 27 percent for women aged 25-29 years and the lowest (21 percent) for women aged 35<br />

years and above, while it was 25 percent for the state. Unmet need for family planning was 17<br />

percent for Hindu women as against 30 percent for Muslim women, 11 percent for Sikh women and<br />

13 percent for other women, while it was only three percent for Buddhist women. The unmet need<br />

for family planning was the highest (42 percent) for scheduled tribe women, followed by 29 percent<br />

for OBC women and the lowest (19 percent) for scheduled caste women. The unmet need for family<br />

planning was the highest (29 percent) for women with one living child, followed by 26 percent for<br />

women with four or more living children and the lowest (22 percent) for women with three living<br />

children, while it was it was 24 percent for women with no living children.<br />

The unmet need for family planning was the highest (28 percent) for non-literate women<br />

and the lowest (18 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 21<br />

percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, unmet need for family planning was<br />

the highest (30 percent) for women with low SLI and the lowest (14 percent) for women with<br />

high SLI, while it was 28 percent for women with medium SLI. These data suggest that there<br />

exists negative association between percentage of unmet need for family planning and education<br />

and standard of living index of the women<br />

6.9.1 Unmet Need for Family Planning Services by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 6.19 gives percentage of currently married women with unmet need by district in Jammu<br />

& Kashmir State. The unmet need for spacing of family was the highest (53 percent) in Baramula<br />

district, followed by 22 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />

Poonch and Rajouri districts. The unmet need for limiting family was the highest (60 percent) in<br />

Doda district, followed by 43 percent in Rajauri district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />

Kargil and Leh districts. The unmet need for family planning was the highest (66 percent) in<br />

Doda district, followed by 59 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (three percent) in Leh<br />

district, while it was 25 percent for the state.<br />

Table 6.19 UNMET NEED BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of currently married women with unmet need by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Unmet need for<br />

Spacing Limiting Total<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

5.8<br />

20.4<br />

52.8<br />

6.3<br />

4.8<br />

2.3<br />

2.9<br />

6.5<br />

59.6<br />

3.4<br />

8.2<br />

23.3<br />

59.3<br />

65.9<br />

8.1<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

7.6<br />

22.1<br />

8.9<br />

2.7<br />

9.1<br />

0.3<br />

7.8<br />

3.3<br />

0.5<br />

3.3<br />

7.9<br />

29.9<br />

12.2<br />

3.1<br />

12.4<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.4<br />

0.5<br />

14.4<br />

11.2<br />

30.7<br />

43.0<br />

5.7<br />

9.2<br />

31.2<br />

43.6<br />

20.1<br />

20.4<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

14.1<br />

10.7<br />

24.8<br />

116


Map-6<br />

Current Use of Any Family Planning Method<br />

117


118


CHAPTER VII<br />

ACCESSIBILITY AND PERCEPTION ABOUT GOVERNMENT<br />

HEALTH FACILITIES<br />

The government health facilities at all the levels provide various RCH services. Auxiliary Nurse<br />

Midwife (ANM), family planning worker or male health worker play a key role in delivering<br />

the services to the community. <strong>Health</strong> workers are expected to make regular visits to all the<br />

households in their assigned area. During these contacts, the health workers are supposed to<br />

monitor various aspects of health of the women and children, provide information related to<br />

health and family planning, counsel and motivate to adopt appropriate health and family planning<br />

practices, and deliver other selected services. These contacts are also important as they enhance<br />

the creditability of services and establish necessary rapport with the clients. In order to assess<br />

the extent of utilisation of government health facilities by all eligible women and to find out<br />

whether ANM/health workers reach the households for providing RCH services, a separate<br />

section in the women’s questionnaire was canvassed to all the eligible women. This chapter<br />

deals with accessibility and opinion of women about the services provided by the government<br />

health workers. The quality of care offered by the government health programme as perceived<br />

by currently married women is also presented.<br />

7.1 Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Workers<br />

Table 7.1 gives percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV or male<br />

health worker during three months prior to the survey. The health worker home visited only<br />

three percent of the women at least once in the last three months preceding the survey in the<br />

state – about four percent in rural areas and over one percent in urban areas. Over two percent<br />

of women aged 15-24 years as against over three percent of women aged 25 years and above<br />

were home visited by the health worker. The health worker home visited more of Hindu women<br />

than women from other religious group. Similarly, health worker home visited more of scheduled<br />

caste women than women from other caste groups. The health worker home visited four percent<br />

of women who had studied for 0-9 years as against three percent of non-literate women and<br />

also women who had studied for 10 years and above. Again, health worker home visited over<br />

four percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against one<br />

percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />

Women who reported a home visit during the three months preceding the survey were<br />

asked who visited their household during the past three months and whether they were satisfied<br />

with the kind of services/advice received, and the time spent by these health workers. Among<br />

women who received services at home, doctor visited 13 percent women, ANM/LHV visited<br />

54 percent women and male health worker visited 37 percent women. Doctor visited more of<br />

women in urban areas and male health worker visited more of women in rural areas. Seventysix<br />

percent of women who received services at home were satisfied with the time spent with<br />

them and 90 percent of women were satisfied with the services or advice given to them.<br />

The percentage of women who were satisfied with the amount of time spent, and advice<br />

provided by health workers varied across various background characteristics. Eighty-three percent<br />

of women aged 25-34 years as against 66 percent women aged 35-44 years reported satisfaction


Table 7.1 HOME VISIT BY HEALTH WORKER<br />

Percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male health worker in the 3 months preceding the<br />

survey, among women who had home visit, satisfied with time spent by health workers and with services provided by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Percentage<br />

with home<br />

visit<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Doctor<br />

Home visit by 1<br />

ANM /<br />

LHV<br />

Male<br />

health<br />

worker<br />

Percentage of<br />

women satisfied with<br />

Amount<br />

of time<br />

Services/<br />

advices<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Age<br />

15.24<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

2.3<br />

3.2<br />

3.1<br />

897<br />

5,101<br />

4,310<br />

*<br />

9.2<br />

18.4<br />

*<br />

61.5<br />

44.1<br />

*<br />

32.0<br />

44.0<br />

*<br />

83.3<br />

65.6<br />

*<br />

92.7<br />

85.1<br />

20<br />

161<br />

132<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

3.6<br />

1.4<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

10.5<br />

34.5<br />

54.2<br />

55.6<br />

39.0<br />

19.8<br />

79.2<br />

49.7<br />

90.4<br />

86.3<br />

280<br />

33<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

2.8<br />

3.9<br />

3.0<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

13.4<br />

6.7<br />

19.1<br />

44.2<br />

66.0<br />

68.2<br />

46.5<br />

33.8<br />

15.4<br />

78.8<br />

83.1<br />

61.5<br />

89.9<br />

93.0<br />

86.9<br />

174<br />

72<br />

67<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Christian<br />

Jain<br />

4.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.3<br />

1.3<br />

0.8<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

10.2<br />

14.6<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

76.1<br />

32.1<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

16.8<br />

58.0<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

75.6<br />

77.3<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

94.2<br />

85.8<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

152<br />

153<br />

6<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Caste/tribe#<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

4.1<br />

1.5<br />

2.3<br />

3.1<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

1.9<br />

*<br />

8.5<br />

14.1<br />

76.3<br />

*<br />

30.7<br />

61.3<br />

22.8<br />

*<br />

66.9<br />

27.5<br />

85.7<br />

*<br />

90.7<br />

76.3<br />

95.9<br />

*<br />

94.1<br />

92.1<br />

48<br />

21<br />

40<br />

184<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Availability of health<br />

facility2 in the village<br />

3.1<br />

3.1<br />

2.8<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

16.0<br />

9.9<br />

17.1<br />

66.3<br />

55.1<br />

43.2<br />

23.3<br />

38.5<br />

44.8<br />

69.3<br />

81.1<br />

71.3<br />

81.7<br />

91.0<br />

94.5<br />

66<br />

166<br />

81<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

4.5<br />

1.0<br />

5,764<br />

2,086<br />

9.9<br />

*<br />

53.9<br />

*<br />

39.8<br />

*<br />

78.6<br />

*<br />

89.8<br />

*<br />

260<br />

21<br />

Total<br />

3.0<br />

10,308<br />

13.1<br />

54.4<br />

36.9<br />

76.1<br />

89.9<br />

314<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

1<br />

Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses. @ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included.<br />

# Total number may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

2<br />

Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village.<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />

with the time spent by health workers. Similarly, 93 percent of women aged 25-34 years as<br />

against 85 percent women aged 35-44 years reported satisfaction with services/advices given<br />

by the health workers during home visit. Seventy-nine percent women in rural areas as against<br />

50 percent women in urban areas were satisfied with the time spent by health workers during<br />

home visits. Similarly, 90 percent women in rural areas as against 86 percent women in urban<br />

areas were satisfied with the time spent by health workers during home visits. The time spent<br />

by health workers during home visit was the highest (83 percent) for women who had studied<br />

120


for 0-9 years and the lowest (61 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above,<br />

while it was 79 percent for non-literate women. The time spent by health workers during home<br />

visit was the highest (81 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (69 percent) for<br />

women with low SLI, while it was 71 percent for women with high SLI. The percentage of<br />

women who were satisfied with services/advices given by health workers during home visit<br />

was 93 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against 87 percent for women<br />

who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 90 percent for non-literate women.<br />

Similarly, percentage of women who were satisfied with services/advices given by health<br />

workers during home visit was 94 percent for women with high SLI as against 91 percent for<br />

women with medium SLI, while it was 82 percent for women with low SLI.<br />

7.2 Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Workers by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 7.2 gives percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male<br />

health worker during three months preceding the survey, among women who had home visit,<br />

satisfied with time spent and with services provided by health workers and district in the state.<br />

The percentage of women who were home visited was the highest (10 percent) in Udhampur<br />

district, followed by over eight percent in Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in<br />

Baramula and Kathua districts. The percentage of women who were home visited by the<br />

doctor was the highest (66 percent) in Leh district, followed by 42 percent in Rajouri district<br />

and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag, Badgam and Kargil districts, while it was 13 percent<br />

for the state. Similarly, percentage of women who were home visited by ANM/LHV was the<br />

highest (100 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 84 percent in Kupwara<br />

district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />

Again, percentage of women who were home visited by the male health worker was the<br />

highest (100 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 78 percent in Srinagar district and the<br />

lowest (11 percent) in Jammu, Kupwara and Pulwama districts, while it was 37 percent for the<br />

state. Figure 7.1 shows distribution of districts by home visit by health worker.<br />

Figure 7.1<br />

Distribution of <strong>District</strong>s by Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Worker<br />

Below 10<br />

14%<br />

2 <strong>District</strong><br />

20 & above<br />

66%<br />

10 <strong>District</strong><br />

10-19.9<br />

20%<br />

3 <strong>District</strong><br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Further, percentage of women home visited by the health workers who were satisfied with<br />

the time spent with them was the highest (100 percent) in Kargil and Poonch districts, followed<br />

121


Table 7.2 HOME VISIT BY HEALTH WORKER BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male health worker in the 3 months preceding the<br />

survey, among women who had home visit, satisfied with time spent by health workers and with services provided by district,<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

Percentage with<br />

home visit<br />

0.1<br />

1.7<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

5.3<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.3<br />

1.6<br />

2.4<br />

1.6<br />

0.8<br />

8.5<br />

9.6<br />

Home visit by 1<br />

Percentage of women satisfied with<br />

Doctor ANM / LHV Male health worker Time spent Service<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.0)<br />

-<br />

(38.8)<br />

9.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

-<br />

(4.6)<br />

(66.0)<br />

(9.4)<br />

(14.3)<br />

(41.6)<br />

18.5<br />

6.0<br />

(100.0)<br />

(74.6)<br />

-<br />

(53.0)<br />

78.9<br />

(100.0)<br />

-<br />

(84.3)<br />

(56.6)<br />

(79.8)<br />

(30.4)<br />

(70.8)<br />

5.0<br />

79.1<br />

(100.0)<br />

(25.4)<br />

-<br />

(54.6)<br />

11.1<br />

(55.4)<br />

-<br />

(11.0)<br />

(20.3)<br />

(10.8)<br />

(55.3)<br />

(41.6)<br />

77.6<br />

23.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

(92.4)<br />

-<br />

(37.1)<br />

73.2<br />

(100.0)<br />

-<br />

(96.5)<br />

(88.0)<br />

(95.6)<br />

(100.0)<br />

(27.0)<br />

69.3<br />

87.4<br />

(100.0)<br />

(92.4)<br />

-<br />

(53.0)<br />

97.7<br />

(100.0)<br />

-<br />

(100.0)<br />

(100.0)<br />

(100.0)<br />

(90.1)<br />

(85.4)<br />

77.8<br />

93.7<br />

Jammu & Kashmir 3.0 13.1 54.4<br />

36.9<br />

76.1<br />

89.9<br />

1<br />

Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses. ( ) Based on less number of cases. - Not Applicable.<br />

by 96 percent in Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag<br />

district, while it was 76 percent for the state. The percentage of women home visited by the<br />

health workers who were satisfied with services rendered was the highest (100 percent) in<br />

Anantnag, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh and Pulwama districts, followed by 98 percent in Jammu<br />

district and the lowest (78 percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 90 percent for the state.<br />

7.3 Matters Discussed during Home visits or Visits to <strong>Health</strong> Facilities<br />

Women who were visited at home by a family planning worker, as well as those who visited<br />

government health facility or other health facility during the three months preceding the survey<br />

were asked about the different topics discussed with the workers during any of these visits.<br />

Table 7.3 gives percentage of women who were visited by health worker during three months<br />

preceding the survey, and percentage of women who visited health facility, and the percentage<br />

of women who discussed specific topics with the health workers in the state. The percentage<br />

of pregnant woman or women with children born during the reference period who were home<br />

visited by the health workers said that topics discussed during the visit were ‘family planning’ (48<br />

percent),‘breastfeeding’ (24 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (13 percent),’immunization’ (60<br />

percent), ‘nutrition’ (32 percent),‘disease prevention’ (19 percent),‘treatment of health problem’<br />

(12 percent),‘antenatal care’ (seven percent),‘delivery care’ (nine percent),‘postpartum care’ (six<br />

percent),’childcare’ (32 percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (19 percent) and ‘oral rehydration’ (three<br />

percent).<br />

The percentage of current contraceptive users women who were home visited by the health<br />

workers during the reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family<br />

planning, (34 percent),’breastfeeding’ (eight percent),’supplementary feeding’ (three percent),<br />

’immunization’ (33 percent),’nutrition’ (eight percent),’disease prevention’ (19 percent),’treatment<br />

of health problem’ (23 percent),’antenatal care’ (five percent),’delivery care’ (five percent),<br />

’postpartum care’ (one percent), ‘childcare’ (seven percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (14 percent),<br />

and ’oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />

122


Table 7.3 MATTER DISCUSSED DURING CONTACT WITH A HEALTH WORKER<br />

Percentage of women who were visited by health worker in the three months preceding the survey, and percentage of<br />

women who visited health facility, and the percentage of women 1 who discussed specific topics with the health worker,<br />

Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Topic discussed<br />

Pregnant women or<br />

women with children after<br />

reference period 2<br />

Other women<br />

Current<br />

contraceptive users<br />

Current<br />

nonusers<br />

Total<br />

During home visit<br />

Family planning<br />

Breastfeeding<br />

Supplementary feeding<br />

Immunization<br />

Nutrition<br />

Diseases prevention<br />

Treatment of health problem<br />

Antenatal care<br />

Delivery care<br />

Postpartum care<br />

Childcare<br />

Sanitation / cleanliness<br />

Oral rehyderation<br />

Other<br />

48.1<br />

24.3<br />

13.5<br />

60.5<br />

32.0<br />

18.9<br />

12.4<br />

7.2<br />

9.4<br />

5.6<br />

32.0<br />

19.4<br />

2.6<br />

0.0<br />

33.7<br />

8.1<br />

2.8<br />

33.2<br />

7.7<br />

19.4<br />

22.6<br />

5.3<br />

4.7<br />

0.6<br />

6.9<br />

13.6<br />

4.0<br />

1.4<br />

72.6<br />

6.3<br />

0.0<br />

13.7<br />

18.8<br />

20.6<br />

18.1<br />

11.3<br />

6.7<br />

1.7<br />

19.5<br />

7.8<br />

6.4<br />

2.9<br />

43.9<br />

13.0<br />

5.8<br />

39.1<br />

17.0<br />

19.4<br />

18.7<br />

6.8<br />

6.5<br />

2.4<br />

16.7<br />

14.6<br />

3.9<br />

1.2<br />

Number of women<br />

100<br />

169<br />

45<br />

314<br />

During visit to health facility<br />

Family planning<br />

Breastfeeding<br />

Supplementary feeding<br />

Immunization<br />

Nutrition<br />

Diseases prevention<br />

Treatment of health problem<br />

Antenatal care<br />

Delivery care<br />

Postpartum care<br />

Childcare<br />

Sanitation / cleanliness<br />

Oral rehyderation<br />

Other<br />

13.5<br />

10.8<br />

5.8<br />

18.9<br />

18.7<br />

12.5<br />

36.6<br />

30.0<br />

14.7<br />

7.2<br />

16.5<br />

2.8<br />

1.7<br />

3.3<br />

16.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.6<br />

4.6<br />

2.8<br />

30.8<br />

52.2<br />

8.5<br />

1.6<br />

1.3<br />

4.1<br />

2.4<br />

4.1<br />

4.3<br />

21.5<br />

6.4<br />

4.6<br />

9.1<br />

9.7<br />

11.8<br />

45.3<br />

25.9<br />

11.1<br />

0.0<br />

8.1<br />

4.5<br />

0.9<br />

4.8<br />

16.6<br />

6.1<br />

3.8<br />

11.1<br />

10.1<br />

20.4<br />

44.2<br />

20.0<br />

8.8<br />

3.9<br />

9.7<br />

3.2<br />

2.7<br />

4.1<br />

Number of women<br />

224<br />

246<br />

Note: Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses.<br />

1<br />

Women who visited private health facility are not included.<br />

2<br />

Reference period for phase I, January 1 st 1999 and for phase II, January 1 st .2001<br />

88<br />

566<br />

The percentage of current non-users women who were home visited by the health workers<br />

during the reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family planning,<br />

(73 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),’supplementary feeding’ (zero percent),’immunization’<br />

(14 percent),’nutrition’ (19 percent),’disease prevention’ (21 percent),’treatment of health problem’<br />

(18 percent),’antenatal care’ (11 percent),’delivery care’ (seven percent), ’postpartum care’ (two<br />

percent), ‘childcare’ (19 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (eight percent), ’oral rehydration’ (six<br />

percent).<br />

The percentage of women who were home visited by the health workers during the<br />

reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family planning, (44<br />

percent),’breastfeeding’ (13 percent),’supplementary feeding’ (six percent),’immunization’ (39<br />

percent),’nutrition’ (17 percent),’disease prevention’ (19 percent),’treatment of health problem’ (19<br />

percent), ’antenatal care’ (seven percent),’delivery care’ (six percent), ’postpartum care’ (two percent),<br />

‘childcare’ (17 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (15 percent), and ’oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />

123


The percentage of pregnant woman or women with children born during the reference<br />

period who visited the health facility said that topics discussed during the visit were ‘family<br />

planning’ (13 percent),‘breastfeeding’ (11 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (six percent), ’immunization’<br />

(19 percent),‘nutrition’ (19 percent),‘disease prevention’ (12 percent),‘treatment of health problem’<br />

(37 percent),‘antenatal care’ (30 percent),‘delivery care’ (15 percent),‘postpartum care’ (seven<br />

percent),’childcare’ (16 percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (three percent) and ‘oral rehydration’<br />

(two percent).<br />

The percentage of current-user woman who visited the health facility said that topics discussed<br />

during the visit were ‘family planning’ (16 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (one percent),<br />

’immunization’ (five percent),‘nutrition’ (three percent),‘disease prevention’ (31 percent),‘treatment<br />

of health problem’ (52 percent),‘antenatal care’ (eight percent),‘delivery care’ (two percent),<br />

‘postpartum care’ (one percent),’childcare’ (four percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (two percent) and<br />

‘oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />

The percentage of current non-users women who visited the health facility said that topics<br />

discussed during the visit were ‘family planning, (21 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),<br />

‘supplementary feeding’ (five percent),’immunization’ (nine percent),’nutrition’ (10 percent),’disease<br />

prevention’ (12 percent),’treatment of health problem’ (45 percent),’antenatal care’ (26 percent),<br />

’delivery care’ (11 percent), ‘childcare’ (eight percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (four percent) and<br />

’oral rehydration’ (one percent).<br />

The percentage of women who visited the health facility said that topics discussed during<br />

visit were ‘family planning, (17 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),’supplementary feeding’<br />

(four percent),’immunization’ (11 percent),’nutrition’ (10 percent),’disease prevention’ (20<br />

percent),’treatment of health problem’ (44 percent),’antenatal care’ (20 percent),’delivery care’<br />

(nine percent), ’postpartum care’ (four percent), ‘childcare’ (10 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’<br />

(three percent) and ’oral rehydration’ (three percent).<br />

7.4 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility<br />

Table 7.4 gives percentage of women who needed to visit health facility and visited health facility<br />

by type of health facility, according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the<br />

village. The data shows that percentage of women who needed to visit health facility but not<br />

visited was 37 percent in the state – 41 percent in rural areas and 25 percent in urban areas. The<br />

percentage of women who needed to visit health facility but not visited was 36 percent for women<br />

living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 53 percent for women living in<br />

villages having health facility in the village. Similarly, percentage of women who needed to visit<br />

health facility and visited was 10 percent in the state – eight percent in rural areas and 15 percent<br />

in urban areas. The percentage of women who visited government health facility visited ‘Hospital/<br />

CHC/FRU/RH (38 percent), ‘dispensary’ (four percent), ‘PHC’ (six percent) and ‘sub-centres’<br />

(six percent). The percentage of women who visited private health facility visited ‘private<br />

hospital’ (29 percent) and ‘private dispensary’ (13 percent), while over three percent women visited<br />

ISM facility (over two percent) and other health facility (less than one percent).<br />

7.5 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 7.5 gives percentage of women who needed to visit health facility, but not visited and<br />

124


Table 7.4 VISIT TO HEALTH FACILITY<br />

Percentage of women who need to visit health facility and visited, and percent distribution of women visited health facility by type of<br />

health facility and according to place of residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> facility<br />

Total<br />

Residence<br />

Availability of health facility 1 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Percentage of women who needed to visit<br />

health facility and not visited<br />

37.1<br />

40.8<br />

25.1<br />

36.5<br />

52.7<br />

Percentage of women who needed to visit<br />

health facility and visited<br />

9.9<br />

8.2<br />

15.5<br />

8.2<br />

8.0<br />

Number of women<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

5,764<br />

2,086<br />

Government health facility<br />

Hospital / CHC / FRU /RH<br />

Dispensary<br />

Primary health center<br />

Sub-center<br />

38.3<br />

4.0<br />

5.6<br />

6.1<br />

30.8<br />

4.7<br />

6.6<br />

9.6<br />

51.0<br />

2.9<br />

3.9<br />

0.2<br />

35.5<br />

7.4<br />

6.2<br />

4.1<br />

29.1<br />

3.7<br />

6.8<br />

11.5<br />

Private health facility<br />

Hospital<br />

Dispensary<br />

29.0<br />

13.2<br />

27.9<br />

16.4<br />

31.0<br />

7.7<br />

24.5<br />

17.3<br />

29.1<br />

16.1<br />

ISM 2 hospital/dispensary<br />

2.5<br />

3.4<br />

0.9<br />

3.6<br />

3.3<br />

Other<br />

0.7<br />

0.0<br />

1.9<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

1,017<br />

640<br />

377<br />

167<br />

473<br />

CHC: Community health center, FRU: First referral unit, RH: Referral Hospital<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village 2 Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />

Note: Total includes 6 missing cases in place of visits who were not shown separately.<br />

percentage of women who visited health facility by district in the state. The percentage of women<br />

who needed to visit health facility but not visited was the highest (94 percent) in Doda district,<br />

followed by over 90 percent in Poonch and Rajouri districts and the lowest (seven percent) in<br />

Badgam district, while it was 37 percent for the state. The percentage of women who needed to<br />

visit health facility and visited was the highest (21 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 20<br />

percent in Udhampur district and the lowest (one percent) in Doda and Poonch districts, while<br />

it was 10 percent for the state. Further, percentage of women who visited government health<br />

facility was the highest (100 percent) in Leh district, followed by 93 percent in Rajouri district<br />

and the lowest (22 percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 55 percent for the state. The<br />

percentage of women who visited private health facility was the highest (76 percent) in Anantnag<br />

district, followed by over 50 percent in Baramula and Kupwara districts and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Leh and Poonch districts, while it was 44 percent for the state.<br />

7.6 Client’s Perception of Quality of Government <strong>Health</strong> Services<br />

Utilization of services is an essential indicator reflecting the quality of services. Better quality of<br />

services would have a higher utilization rate, which is very important from the policy point of view.<br />

Unless clients are satisfied with the services provided by the government, efforts made by the<br />

government will be wasted. In order to assess the utilization of government health facilities, a<br />

question was asked ‘During last three months did you visit any health facility for any of your<br />

health problem’. Those who visited the government health facility were asked their perceptions<br />

125


Table 7.5 VISIT TO HEALTH FACILITY BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of women who needed to visit health facility, but not visited and percentage of women who visited health facility by<br />

type of health facility by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>s<br />

Percentage of women who<br />

need to visit health facility,<br />

but not visited<br />

Percentage of women<br />

who need to visit health<br />

facility and visited<br />

Percentage of women who visited to<br />

Government health<br />

facility<br />

Private health facility<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

22.9<br />

7.2<br />

21.8<br />

94.3<br />

26.2<br />

12.8<br />

6.2<br />

4.0<br />

1.0<br />

11.5<br />

22.4<br />

60.2<br />

49.4<br />

(61.1)<br />

58.7<br />

75.9<br />

39.8<br />

50.6<br />

(38.9)<br />

39.3<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

12.4<br />

20.4<br />

20.1<br />

15.7<br />

20.4<br />

21.0<br />

10.3<br />

15.2<br />

8.4<br />

15.2<br />

65.2<br />

60.0<br />

49.7<br />

100.0<br />

51.4<br />

34.8<br />

40.0<br />

50.3<br />

0.0<br />

48.6<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

90.4<br />

90.8<br />

43.4<br />

44.3<br />

0.7<br />

3.2<br />

5.0<br />

20.4<br />

(83.0)<br />

92.7<br />

70.0<br />

61.3<br />

(0.0)<br />

7.3<br />

25.8<br />

38.2<br />

Jammu & Kashmir.<br />

37.1<br />

9.9<br />

55.1<br />

43.6<br />

( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />

about quality of services such as personal manner like courtesy, respect, sensitivity, and friendliness<br />

of the physician and staff, technical skills and quality like thoroughness, carefulness, and<br />

competence and waiting time for receiving the services, which are presented in Table 7.6.<br />

Women who visited government health facility and rated quality and availability of services<br />

as good and excellent as ‘convenience of the health facility location’ (64 percent),‘length of<br />

time spent towards waiting’ (62 percent),’personal manner of the physician’ (84 percent),’<br />

technical skills and quality of physician’ (84 percent),’personal manner of nurse’ (72 percent),<br />

’technical skills and quality of nurse’ (72 percent),’personal manner of other staff’ (73<br />

percent),’technical skills and quality of other staff’ (71 percent),’explanation of what was<br />

done to her’ (67 percent),’medical, surgical and diagnostic equipment’ (66 percent) and ‘general<br />

comforts’ (55 percent). These data have shown that the respondents, who visited government<br />

health facility, were generally satisfied with the services and facilities, including general<br />

comfort, available there.<br />

7.7 Reason for not visiting Government <strong>Health</strong> Centre<br />

Women who visited the private health centre were asked the main reason for not visiting the<br />

government health centre and the results are presented in Table 7.7. The reason given are ‘not<br />

conveniently located’ (eight percent),’time is not suited’ (two percent),’poor quality of service,<br />

(15 percent),’heavy rush’ (23 percent),’non/rare availability of doctors/health workers’ (12 percent),<br />

’doctors/health workers do not examine properly, (18 percent),’medicine not/rarely given or of<br />

bad quality’ (seven percent),’doctors/paramedical staff does not behave properly’ (13 percent),<br />

’services are charged’ (less than one percent) and ‘referred by government doctor’ (over one percent).<br />

7.8 Family Planning Information and Advice Received<br />

Table 7.8 gives percentage of current non-users who were ever advised by ANM/health worker<br />

126


Table 7.6 QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT HEALTH FACILITY<br />

Percentage of women who visited government health facility and rated quality and availability of services during most recent<br />

visit to a government health facility in the three months proceeding the survey, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Quality indicator Poor Good Excellent<br />

The convenience of the health facility location<br />

Length 1 of time spend towards waiting<br />

Personal manner 2 of the physician 5<br />

The technical skills and quality 3 of the physician 5<br />

Personal manner 2 of nurse<br />

The technical skills and quality 3 of nurse<br />

Personal manner of other staff 5<br />

The technical skills and quality of other 4 staff<br />

The explanation of what was done to her<br />

Medical, surgical and diagnostic equipment<br />

General comfort<br />

33.3<br />

31.3<br />

14.1<br />

14.4<br />

24.6<br />

24.8<br />

25.4<br />

26.0<br />

27.3<br />

26.7<br />

35.0<br />

61.0<br />

61.5<br />

79.5<br />

80.4<br />

70.6<br />

68.0<br />

69.6<br />

65.0<br />

63.2<br />

64.1<br />

53.8<br />

2.8<br />

0.9<br />

4.7<br />

3.2<br />

1.5<br />

3.7<br />

3.0<br />

5.8<br />

3.9<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1<br />

Poor indicate long waiting time, good indicate average waiting time, and excellent indicate short waiting time<br />

2<br />

Courtesy, respect, sensitivity, friendliness.<br />

3<br />

Thoroughness, carefulness, competence.<br />

4<br />

Including paramedical staff.<br />

5<br />

Includes hospital/community health center/ first referral unit/ referral hospital, dispensary, and primacy health center last<br />

visit made by women<br />

Table 7.7 REASON FOR NOT PREFERRING GOVERNMENT HEALTH FACILITY<br />

Percent distribution of women visited private health facility by reason for not visiting government health facility and according<br />

to residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Reason<br />

Total<br />

Availability of health<br />

Residence<br />

facility 1 in the village<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />

Not conveniently located<br />

Time is not suited<br />

Poor quality of services<br />

Heavy rush<br />

Non/rare-availability of doctors/health workers<br />

Doctors/health workers do not examine properly<br />

Medicine not/rarely given or of bad quality<br />

Doctors/paramedical staff does not behave properly<br />

Services are charged<br />

Referred by government doctor<br />

Other<br />

7.8<br />

1.6<br />

15.4<br />

23.2<br />

12.2<br />

18.4<br />

6.6<br />

12.6<br />

0.2<br />

1.3<br />

0.7<br />

3.2<br />

0.9<br />

15.9<br />

23.7<br />

14.5<br />

19.3<br />

5.4<br />

15.2<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

17.4<br />

3.1<br />

14.4<br />

22.1<br />

7.5<br />

16.7<br />

8.9<br />

7.5<br />

0.0<br />

1.6<br />

0.8<br />

1.9<br />

0.0<br />

21.7<br />

34.0<br />

0.0<br />

21.4<br />

5.9<br />

15.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

3.6<br />

1.2<br />

13.9<br />

20.3<br />

19.4<br />

18.6<br />

5.3<br />

15.2<br />

0.5<br />

1.5<br />

0.8<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

446<br />

300<br />

146<br />

76<br />

224<br />

1<br />

Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />

government dispensary within the village<br />

to adopt family planning method by method of family planning by residence in the state. The<br />

percentage of non-users who were advised to adopt family planning method was six percent<br />

in the state – six percent in rural areas and seven percent in urban areas. The family planning<br />

methods advised were ‘female sterilization’ (41 percent),’male sterilization’ (22 percent),<br />

’IUD’ (10 percent),’pills’ (11 percent) and ‘condom’ (eight percent). The rural-urban differential<br />

exists for all the modern methods. Only one percent of the current non-users were advised<br />

rhythm/periodic abstinence.<br />

7.9 Availability of Pills and Condom<br />

To explore difficulties faced in the procurement of condoms and pills, current users of these<br />

127


Table 7.8 ADVISE TO ADOPT FAMILY PLANNING METHOD<br />

Percentage of current non-users who reported ever advised to adopt family planning method by method of family planning by<br />

ANM/health worker, according to residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Method Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Percentage of non-users who were advised to adopt family planning method<br />

5.9<br />

5.6<br />

7.3<br />

Number of women<br />

4,306<br />

3,558<br />

749<br />

Method<br />

Female sterilization<br />

Male sterilization<br />

IUD<br />

Pills<br />

Condom<br />

Rhythem/periodic abstinence<br />

Missing<br />

41.0<br />

22.5<br />

9.7<br />

11.6<br />

8.0<br />

0.8<br />

6.3<br />

46.5<br />

21.5<br />

7.7<br />

14.3<br />

3.6<br />

1.0<br />

5.4<br />

21.2<br />

26.2<br />

17.1<br />

1.8<br />

23.8<br />

0.0<br />

9.9<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

252<br />

198<br />

55<br />

methods were asked whether they had been able to get their supply whenever needed? The<br />

results are presented in Table 7.9. The percentage of condom users who had a problem in<br />

getting supply was over16 percent in the state – 15 percent in rural areas and over 21 percent<br />

in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of Pills users who had a problem in getting supply was<br />

seven percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and 10 percent in urban areas. A higher<br />

proportion of urban women than rural women had problems in getting a supply of condom<br />

and Pills.<br />

Table 7.9 AVAILABILITY OF REGULAR SUPPLY OF CONDOMS/PILLS<br />

Percentage of current condom or pill users who ever had a problem getting a supply of condoms/pills by residence, Jammu<br />

and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Method/residence Percentage who had a problem getting supply Number of users<br />

Condom<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Total<br />

Pills<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Total<br />

5.6<br />

9.6<br />

7.2<br />

1,124<br />

737<br />

1,861<br />

Note: Total includes 3 cases with missing information from condom and 32 cases from pills were not shown separately.<br />

7.10 Quality of Care of Family Planning Services<br />

Table 7.10 gives percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other<br />

modern method by the source where they get sterilized, according to source of sterilization<br />

and residence in the state. The percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed<br />

about other modern methods by the government health facility where they got sterilized was<br />

54 percent in the state – 56 percent in rural areas and 45 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />

current users of sterilization who were informed about other modern methods by the family<br />

planning or RCH camp/village secession where they got sterilized was 29 percent in the state –<br />

31 percent in rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. The percentage of current users of<br />

sterilization who were informed about other modern methods by the private health facility<br />

14.7<br />

21.5<br />

16.5<br />

341<br />

121<br />

463<br />

128


Table 7.10 INFORMATION OF OTHER MODERN METHOD BEFORE STERILIZATION<br />

Percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other modern method by the source where they get<br />

sterilized, according to the source of sterilization and residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Source of sterilization Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Government health facility<br />

Family planning or RCH camp/ village session<br />

Private health facility<br />

Other<br />

Total<br />

54.2<br />

28.6<br />

48.2<br />

(48.0)<br />

52.1<br />

56.5<br />

30.6<br />

48.8<br />

(40.0)<br />

54.4<br />

45.0<br />

23.0<br />

45.5<br />

(60.0)<br />

Note: Total includes 12 women who said that they do not know of place/source of sterilization, are not shown separately.<br />

( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

43.6<br />

Number<br />

of users<br />

where they got sterilized was 48 percent in the state – 49 percent in rural areas and 45 percent<br />

in urban areas. The percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other<br />

modern methods by all the source where they got sterilized was 52 percent in the state – 54<br />

percent in rural areas and 44 percent in urban areas.<br />

Table 7.11 gives percentage of current users of modern contraceptive methods who<br />

were told about side effects or other problems of current method by a health worker or ANM/<br />

Nurse at the time of accepting the method, and percentage who received follow-up services<br />

after accepting the method by current method and residence in the state. The percentage of<br />

current users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other<br />

problems of current method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the<br />

method was 43 percent for the acceptors of sterilization, 27 percent for the users of other<br />

method and 35 percent for the acceptor of any modern method. Further, percentage of current<br />

users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other problems of<br />

current method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the method and<br />

percentage who received follow-up services after adopting the method was over 10 percent for<br />

sterilization, six percent for other modern method and over eight percent for any modern method.<br />

Table 7.11 INFORMATION ON SIDE EFFECT AND FOLLOW-UP FOR CURRENT METHOD<br />

Percentage of current users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other problems of current<br />

method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the method and percentage who received follow-up<br />

services after accepting the method by current method and residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Information/follow-up Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Told about side effects<br />

Sterilization<br />

Other modern method<br />

Any modern method<br />

43.0<br />

26.7<br />

35.1<br />

42.9<br />

30.1<br />

37.4<br />

43.3<br />

20.8<br />

29.4<br />

2,276<br />

139<br />

294<br />

43<br />

2,777<br />

Received follow-up<br />

Sterilization<br />

Other modern method<br />

Any modern method<br />

10.5<br />

5.9<br />

8.3<br />

9.0<br />

5.9<br />

7.7<br />

16.1<br />

5.8<br />

9.8<br />

7.11 Quality of Care Indicators for Contraceptive Users by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 7.12 gives percentage of currently married women who are current users of modern<br />

contraceptive method, quality of care indicators related to use of current contraceptive method<br />

by district. The percentage of women informed about other methods before getting sterilization<br />

was the highest (90 percent) in Doda district, followed by 83 percent in Kupwara district and<br />

the lowest(10 percent) in Kathua district, while it was35 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />

129


Table 7.12 QUALITY OF CARE INDICATORS FOR CONTRACEPTIVE USERS BY DISTRICT<br />

Among currently married women who are current users of modern contraceptive methods, quality of care indicators related to<br />

the use of their current contraceptive method by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Percentage informed<br />

about other methods<br />

before getting<br />

sterilization 1<br />

Percentage told about side<br />

effects or other problems with<br />

method 2<br />

Sterilization<br />

Other modern<br />

method<br />

Percentage who received<br />

follow –up 2<br />

Sterilization<br />

Other modern<br />

method<br />

Percentage nonuser<br />

told ever had<br />

advised to adopt<br />

contraceptive<br />

method<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

54.2<br />

41.9<br />

11.6<br />

90.1<br />

61.9<br />

66.2<br />

36.6<br />

16.3<br />

98.5<br />

29.3<br />

50.2<br />

(27.4)<br />

31.9<br />

9.5<br />

23.6<br />

10.5<br />

26.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

14.5<br />

11.9<br />

(12.6)<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

4.4<br />

17.8<br />

4.4<br />

0.8<br />

0.2<br />

12.9<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

38.7<br />

10.0<br />

83.5<br />

57.1<br />

81.4<br />

27.3<br />

3.8<br />

70.8<br />

44.5<br />

66.9<br />

39.4<br />

1.5<br />

74.0<br />

35.6<br />

74.1<br />

20.9<br />

3.0<br />

15.1<br />

32.0<br />

14.2<br />

36.4<br />

1.6<br />

6.4<br />

38.5<br />

8.2<br />

4.0<br />

11.1<br />

14.3<br />

2.8<br />

13.0<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

82.5<br />

26.9<br />

72.0<br />

26.7<br />

3.8<br />

52.1<br />

42.0<br />

35.2<br />

5.9<br />

30.4<br />

23.4<br />

19.0<br />

1.1<br />

0.7<br />

12.0<br />

18.5<br />

3.7<br />

3.6<br />

0.4<br />

4.6<br />

2.5<br />

1.5<br />

6.8<br />

7.3<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

35.1<br />

43.0<br />

1<br />

At the time of accepting the current method.<br />

2<br />

By a health worker or ANM/Nurse after accepting the current method. ( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />

26.7<br />

10.5<br />

5.9<br />

11.1<br />

current users of sterilization who were told about side effects or other problems related with use<br />

of method was the highest (98 percent) in Doda district, followed by 71 percent in Kupwara<br />

districts and the lowest (four percent) in Kathua and Poonch districts, while it was 43 percent<br />

for the state. Similarly, percentage of current users of other modern methods who were told<br />

about side effects or other problems related with use of method was the highest (74 percent) in<br />

Kupwara and Pulwama district, followed by 50 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />

(over one percent) in Kathua district, while it was 27 percent for the state.<br />

Further, percentage of current users of sterilization who received follow-up services<br />

was the highest (32 percent) in Leh district, followed by 26 percent in Badgam district and the<br />

lowest (zero percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was over 10 percent for the state.<br />

The percentage of current users of other modern method who received follow-up services was<br />

the highest (38 percent) in Leh district, followed by 36 percent in Kargil district and the lowest<br />

(zero percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was six percent for the state. Again,<br />

percentage of non-users who had never been advised to adopt contraceptive method was the<br />

highest (18 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 14 percent in Kupwara district and the<br />

lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district, while it was 11 percent for the state.<br />

7.12 Quality of Care of Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Care<br />

Information on few other aspects of quality of care in terms of maternal care was also collected.<br />

Women with last live/still births during three years preceding the survey were asked whether<br />

the Doctor/ANM/health worker advised you to go to health facility for delivery when they<br />

were pregnant, and received any follow-up care after delivering the baby within 2 weeks of<br />

delivery and received follow care at least one visit within six weeks of delivery. The same<br />

130


information is presented in Table 7.13. The percentage of women who were advised to have<br />

delivery at health facility was 53 percent in the state – 52 percent in rural areas and 55 percent<br />

in urban areas. The percentage of women who were visited within two weeks of delivery was<br />

over five percent in the state irrespective of the place of residence. The percentage of women<br />

who were visited at least once within six week was 28 percent in the state – 23 percent in rural<br />

areas and 47 percent in urban areas.<br />

Table 7.13 ADVISED TO HAVE DELIVERY AT HEALTH FACILITY AND FOLLOW-UP SERVICES FOR POSTPARTUM<br />

CHECK-UP<br />

Percentage of women* who were advised to have delivery at health facility by doctor/ health worker and percentage who<br />

receive follow-up services within 2 weeks and within 6 weeks of delivery by ANM, according to residence, Jammu and<br />

Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Advise/follow-up service Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />

Percentage of women who were advised to have delivery at health facility<br />

52.8<br />

52.2<br />

54.8<br />

Percentage of women who were visited within 2 weeks of delivery<br />

5.4<br />

5.5<br />

5.3<br />

Percentage of women who were visited at least once within 6 weeks of delivery<br />

28.5<br />

22.7<br />

46.6<br />

Number of women<br />

2,595<br />

1,965<br />

631<br />

* Women who had live birth/still birth after 1.1.1999/2001<br />

Note: Total includes 30, 10, 84 cases with missing information in advised to have delivery at health facility, visited within 2<br />

weeks of delivery and visited at least once within 6 weeks of delivery respectively.<br />

Table 7.14 gives percentage of currently married women who have given live/still birth<br />

three years preceding the survey, quality of care indicators related to delivery care by district.<br />

The percentage of women who were advised to have delivery at the health facility by doctor/<br />

health worker was the highest (84 percent) in Srinagar district, followed by 82 percent in<br />

Kargil and Kupwara districts and the lowest (12 percent) in Badgam district. The percentage<br />

of women who were advised to have delivery at the health facility by doctor/health worker<br />

was the higher than that of the state (53 percent) in Anantnag, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh,<br />

Pulwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining seven districts it was lower than that<br />

of the state. Further, percentage of women who were visited within two weeks of delivery by<br />

the ANM was the highest (32 percent) in Doda district, followed by 27 percent in Udhampur<br />

district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of women who were<br />

visited within two weeks of delivery by the ANM was higher than that of the state (over five<br />

percent) in Doda, Jammu, Kargil, Rajouri, Srinagar and Uddhampur districts, while in the<br />

remaining eight districts it was lower than that of the state. Again, percentage of women who were<br />

visited at-least once within six weeks of delivery by the ANM was the highest (88 percent) in<br />

Jammu district, followed by 63 percent in Doda district and the lowest (one percent) in<br />

Baramula district. The percentage of women who were visited at-least once within two weeks<br />

of delivery by the ANM was lower than that of the state (28 percent) in 12 districtds of<br />

Anantnag, Badgm, Baramula, Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch, Rajouri,<br />

Srinagar and Udhampur, while in the remaining two districts of Doda and Jammu of the state<br />

it was higher than that of the state.<br />

131


Table 7.14 QUALITY OF CARE INDICATORS FOR MATERNAL CARE<br />

Among currently married women* who are given live/still birth three years preceding the survey, quality of care indicators<br />

related to delivery care by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percentage of women<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Advised to have delivery at health<br />

facility by doctor/ health worker<br />

Visited within 2 weeks of<br />

delivery by ANM<br />

Visited at least one within 6<br />

weeks of delivery by ANM<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

68.2<br />

12.2<br />

43.2<br />

33.3<br />

65.0<br />

0.6<br />

0.9<br />

1.2<br />

32.5<br />

6.5<br />

2.9<br />

1.7<br />

1.2<br />

62.7<br />

88.1<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

82.5<br />

23.4<br />

82.5<br />

76.0<br />

80.4<br />

15.5<br />

1.8<br />

4.0<br />

4.4<br />

3.4<br />

27.4<br />

12.2<br />

4.7<br />

4.4<br />

4.3<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

33.6<br />

48.2<br />

84.2<br />

50.0<br />

0.0<br />

8.2<br />

9.0<br />

26.8<br />

6.7<br />

19.3<br />

7.7<br />

25.9<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

52.8<br />

5.4<br />

28.5<br />

* Women who had live birth/still birth after 1.1.1999/2001<br />

132


CHAPTER – VIII<br />

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROBLEMS<br />

AND AWARENESS OF RTIs/STIs AND HIV/AIDS<br />

One of the important components of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme is to have<br />

a healthy sexual life without any fear of contracting disease. With this approach the RCH<br />

programme places a lot of emphasis on promoting and encouraging healthy sexual behaviour<br />

among couples through various Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities.<br />

<strong>Health</strong> workers are also expected to educate women and men about Reproductive Tract<br />

Infections (RTIs) and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and motivate those people with<br />

RTI/STI problems to seek medical help. The DLHS-RCH has made an attempt to collect<br />

information on awareness and prevalence of RTI/STI. Apart from this, information on<br />

knowledge of HIV/AIDS, source of information and way of avoiding AIDS were also<br />

collected.<br />

8.1 Awareness of RTI/STI<br />

An attempt was made to asses whether couples were aware of RTI/STI. Currently married<br />

women and their husbands were asked about their awareness of RTI/STI, and if they were<br />

aware, they were further questioned about the source of information and mode of transmission<br />

of the disease. Table 8.1 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who<br />

have heard about RTI/STI and percentage who received information from specific sources by<br />

selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women who<br />

have heard about RTI/STI was 15 percent in the state – over 14 percent in rural areas and 18 percent<br />

in urban areas. Awareness of RTI/STI was the lowest (seven percent) for women aged 15-19<br />

years, which increases with age and was the highest (19 percent) for women aged 30-34 years<br />

and declines to 16 percent in the age group 35-39 years and to 11 percent in the age group 40-44<br />

years. Awareness of RTI/STI was over six percent for Hindu women as against 20 percent for<br />

Muslim women, 13 percent for Sikh women and 46 percent for Buddhist women, while it was<br />

23 percent for other women. Similarly, awareness of RTI/STI was eight percent for scheduled<br />

caste women as against six percent for scheduled tribe women and 24 percent for OBC<br />

women, while it was 16 percent for other caste women. Awareness of RTI/STI was the highest<br />

(21 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (12 percent)<br />

for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 14 percent for non-literate women.<br />

Awareness of RTI/STI was the highest (21 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />

lowest (two percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 15 percent for women with high<br />

SLI. Figure 8.1 shows awareness of RTI/STI by sex according to residence.<br />

Those women who had heard of RTI/STI reported source of its information as ‘radio’<br />

(89 percent),’television’ (87 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (21 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />

hoardings’ (seven percent),’doctor’ (eight percent),’health worker’ (seven<br />

percent),’school teacher’ (four percent),’community meeting’ (six percent) and ‘relatives/friends’<br />

(73 percent).<br />

Table 8.2 gives percentage of husbands of eligible women who have heard of RTI/STI, percentage<br />

who received information from specific sources by selected background characteristics in the


Table 8.1 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15 - 44 who have heard about RTI/STI and among women who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources<br />

by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />

Background<br />

Characteristic<br />

Age group (years)<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9 years@<br />

10 and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Percentage<br />

who have<br />

heard about<br />

RTI/STI<br />

7.4<br />

10.1<br />

15.0<br />

18.7<br />

16.4<br />

11.3<br />

14.5<br />

18.2<br />

14.2<br />

12.5<br />

20.8<br />

6.4<br />

19.9<br />

13.0<br />

46.1<br />

(22.6)<br />

7.6<br />

5.9<br />

24.0<br />

16.5<br />

1.6<br />

21.3<br />

14.7<br />

Number of<br />

Women<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

Radio<br />

*<br />

93.1<br />

88.5<br />

87.7<br />

93.0<br />

84.9<br />

90.0<br />

87.7<br />

95.6<br />

94.9<br />

75.1<br />

67.8<br />

95.2<br />

(84.8)<br />

45.7<br />

*<br />

80.2<br />

50.2<br />

96.7<br />

90.0<br />

68.9<br />

93.4<br />

80.3<br />

Television<br />

*<br />

90.4<br />

85.5<br />

83.9<br />

91.7<br />

86.5<br />

86.2<br />

89.6<br />

94.0<br />

93.0<br />

71.6<br />

70.1<br />

91.4<br />

(75.8)<br />

66.4<br />

*<br />

83.4<br />

70.6<br />

94.3<br />

86.7<br />

76.4<br />

92.1<br />

74.9<br />

Among those who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from.<br />

Newspaper/<br />

Books/<br />

Magazines<br />

*<br />

12.0<br />

29.6<br />

20.6<br />

18.2<br />

16.9<br />

19.4<br />

25.5<br />

8.6<br />

14.2<br />

47.8<br />

66.6<br />

10.7<br />

(51.5)<br />

51.5<br />

*<br />

81.1<br />

48.6<br />

5.3<br />

20.3<br />

58.2<br />

12.2<br />

41.8<br />

Slogan/<br />

Pamphlets/<br />

Posters/<br />

Wall Hoardings Doctor<br />

*<br />

0.9<br />

9.5<br />

6.8<br />

8.0<br />

3.5<br />

4.2<br />

14.3<br />

1.5<br />

1.8<br />

20.0<br />

22.3<br />

3.0<br />

(9.1)<br />

32.3<br />

*<br />

14.1<br />

27.0<br />

0.3<br />

7.9<br />

17.9<br />

1.8<br />

20.1<br />

*<br />

4.8<br />

11.4<br />

6.6<br />

8.0<br />

9.6<br />

5.5<br />

15.8<br />

0.7<br />

5.0<br />

24.3<br />

29.4<br />

4.2<br />

(15.2)<br />

14.8<br />

*<br />

9.2<br />

12.9<br />

1.0<br />

11.3<br />

3.5<br />

3.7<br />

21.2<br />

<strong>Health</strong><br />

worker<br />

*<br />

2.4<br />

9.1<br />

7.7<br />

7.0<br />

5.9<br />

6.7<br />

8.9<br />

0.8<br />

5.4<br />

20.5<br />

9.0<br />

6.7<br />

(15.2)<br />

9.9<br />

*<br />

3.8<br />

9.2<br />

1.0<br />

10.5<br />

6.1<br />

4.0<br />

16.3<br />

School<br />

teacher<br />

*<br />

1.8<br />

6.5<br />

3.1<br />

3.0<br />

1.1<br />

3.0<br />

4.9<br />

0.2<br />

1.9<br />

10.5<br />

4.1<br />

3.3<br />

(12.1)<br />

4.4<br />

*<br />

10.9<br />

4.9<br />

0.0<br />

4.3<br />

0.4<br />

1.8<br />

8.5<br />

Community<br />

Meeting<br />

*<br />

4.9<br />

6.6<br />

7.9<br />

6.4<br />

2.0<br />

7.2<br />

4.2<br />

3.5<br />

4.5<br />

12.4<br />

2.1<br />

6.7<br />

(30.3)<br />

1.3<br />

*<br />

1.2<br />

3.9<br />

3.7<br />

7.9<br />

6.8<br />

5.3<br />

9.0<br />

Relative/<br />

Friends<br />

*<br />

83.8<br />

63.4<br />

69.1<br />

80.4<br />

79.8<br />

71.6<br />

76.3<br />

85.3<br />

80.1<br />

46.5<br />

26.3<br />

84.1<br />

(78.8)<br />

6.5<br />

*<br />

18.3<br />

6.4<br />

91.8<br />

76.2<br />

3.1<br />

82.0<br />

54.5<br />

Others<br />

*<br />

0.0<br />

3.5<br />

2.6<br />

3.7<br />

1.8<br />

3.3<br />

2.0<br />

0.8<br />

1.4<br />

7.5<br />

5.3<br />

2.4<br />

(9.1)<br />

2.4<br />

*<br />

3.5<br />

4.1<br />

1.1<br />

3.6<br />

7.9<br />

1.4<br />

6.6<br />

Number of<br />

women who<br />

have heard<br />

about<br />

RTI/STI<br />

5<br />

85<br />

367<br />

498<br />

449<br />

179<br />

1,135<br />

447<br />

880<br />

229<br />

473<br />

232<br />

1,255<br />

34<br />

54<br />

7<br />

88<br />

80<br />

424<br />

967<br />

35<br />

1,124<br />

423<br />

Total<br />

15.3<br />

10,308<br />

89.4<br />

87.1<br />

21.1<br />

7.1<br />

8.4<br />

7.3<br />

3.6<br />

6.3<br />

72.9<br />

2.9<br />

1,582<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />

134


Table 8.2 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />

Percentage of husbands of eligible women who have heard about RTI/STI and among men who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources by<br />

selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />

Background characteristic<br />

Age group (years)<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Percentage<br />

who have<br />

heard about<br />

RTI/STI<br />

25.9<br />

26.4<br />

28.9<br />

22.9<br />

27.2<br />

27.3<br />

12.9<br />

21.8<br />

43.3<br />

10.4<br />

35.8<br />

23.8<br />

51.5<br />

(26.7)<br />

8.2<br />

17.8<br />

37.2<br />

29.6<br />

10.6<br />

32.7<br />

29.6<br />

Number of<br />

men<br />

181<br />

3,549<br />

5,257<br />

1,251<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

3,797<br />

2,252<br />

4,174<br />

3,394<br />

6,367<br />

301<br />

146<br />

30<br />

1,075<br />

1,391<br />

1,736<br />

5,830<br />

2,119<br />

5,272<br />

2,847<br />

Radio<br />

79.6<br />

83.6<br />

81.0<br />

78.4<br />

81.8<br />

81.1<br />

96.9<br />

87.4<br />

75.9<br />

50.3<br />

87.2<br />

83.9<br />

56.8<br />

*<br />

56.9<br />

62.5<br />

86.9<br />

84.5<br />

60.7<br />

88.7<br />

72.6<br />

Among those who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from.<br />

Television<br />

82.0<br />

83.1<br />

83.8<br />

85.7<br />

83.5<br />

84.7<br />

92.5<br />

90.3<br />

79.6<br />

55.7<br />

88.4<br />

83.9<br />

75.3<br />

*<br />

61.7<br />

78.9<br />

86.8<br />

85.0<br />

64.9<br />

89.1<br />

78.0<br />

Newspaper/<br />

Books/<br />

Magazines<br />

35.1<br />

39.0<br />

32.3<br />

31.9<br />

31.3<br />

45.0<br />

4.1<br />

18.2<br />

47.2<br />

49.5<br />

30.3<br />

74.5<br />

57.8<br />

*<br />

45.3<br />

36.8<br />

25.6<br />

38.1<br />

31.5<br />

27.8<br />

49.3<br />

Slogan/<br />

Pamphlets<br />

/ Posters/<br />

Wall<br />

Hoardings Doctor<br />

13.6<br />

10.6<br />

10.1<br />

14.8<br />

8.5<br />

18.1<br />

2.1<br />

3.9<br />

15.0<br />

24.7<br />

7.9<br />

16.5<br />

28.8<br />

*<br />

27.4<br />

20.4<br />

4.4<br />

11.2<br />

17.8<br />

7.3<br />

16.2<br />

23.9<br />

24.2<br />

20.7<br />

28.2<br />

22.9<br />

22.3<br />

4.4<br />

22.8<br />

27.7<br />

42.7<br />

19.4<br />

42.4<br />

12.8<br />

*<br />

51.3<br />

17.3<br />

8.4<br />

28.2<br />

38.6<br />

18.5<br />

27.1<br />

<strong>Health</strong><br />

worker<br />

10.9<br />

8.9<br />

8.2<br />

8.7<br />

7.6<br />

11.7<br />

2.1<br />

4.8<br />

11.2<br />

15.4<br />

7.5<br />

13.0<br />

4.1<br />

*<br />

17.4<br />

10.9<br />

5.1<br />

9.5<br />

20.2<br />

5.5<br />

11.6<br />

School<br />

teacher<br />

5.2<br />

7.6<br />

6.0<br />

7.6<br />

6.9<br />

5.9<br />

1.1<br />

2.7<br />

9.1<br />

7.3<br />

6.3<br />

20.5<br />

1.8<br />

*<br />

15.9<br />

11.0<br />

3.0<br />

7.3<br />

14.8<br />

4.8<br />

8.2<br />

Community<br />

Meeting<br />

9.3<br />

9.7<br />

10.0<br />

7.9<br />

9.0<br />

11.9<br />

2.8<br />

7.0<br />

12.2<br />

7.1<br />

10.0<br />

18.8<br />

3.8<br />

*<br />

8.8<br />

10.5<br />

9.9<br />

9.7<br />

10.9<br />

10.2<br />

8.4<br />

Relative/<br />

Friends<br />

55.3<br />

56.2<br />

55.5<br />

45.5<br />

52.2<br />

62.8<br />

88.5<br />

65.8<br />

42.6<br />

34.7<br />

59.4<br />

56.1<br />

3.2<br />

*<br />

34.6<br />

9.5<br />

68.5<br />

59.2<br />

21.2<br />

65.6<br />

41.5<br />

Others<br />

4.6<br />

3.5<br />

3.2<br />

2.8<br />

2.9<br />

4.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

4.4<br />

5.7<br />

3.0<br />

2.1<br />

0.7<br />

*<br />

6.9<br />

8.2<br />

1.1<br />

3.4<br />

8.8<br />

2.4<br />

3.7<br />

Number of<br />

men who<br />

have heard<br />

about<br />

RTI/STI<br />

47<br />

938<br />

1,518<br />

287<br />

2,125<br />

665<br />

488<br />

491<br />

1,809<br />

354<br />

2,280<br />

72<br />

75<br />

8<br />

88<br />

247<br />

646<br />

1,724<br />

225<br />

1,722<br />

843<br />

Total<br />

27.2 10,239 81.6 83.8 34.6 10.8 22.7 8.6 6.7 9.7 54.7<br />

Note: Table includes 2 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

#Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />

3.3<br />

2,790<br />

135


Figure 8.1<br />

Awarness of RTI/STI by Sex According to Residence<br />

Total<br />

Women<br />

15<br />

Men<br />

27<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Women<br />

15<br />

Men<br />

27<br />

Urban<br />

Women<br />

18<br />

Men<br />

27<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percent<br />

Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of men who have heard about RTI/STI was 27 percent<br />

in the state irrespective of place of residence. The awareness of RTI/STI was the highest (29 percent)<br />

for men aged 35-44 years and the lowest (23 percent) for men aged 45 years and above. The<br />

awareness of RTI/STI was 10 percent for Hindus as against 36 percent for Muslims, 24 percent for<br />

Sikhs and 51 percent for Buddhist, while it was 27 percent for others. The awareness of RTI/STI<br />

was eight percent for scheduled caste men as against 18 percent for scheduled tribe men, 37 percent<br />

for OBC men, while it was 30 percent for other caste men. The awareness of RTI/STI was the highest<br />

(43 percent) for men who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (13 percent) for nonliterate<br />

men, while it was 22 percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years. The awareness of<br />

RTI/STI was the highest (33 percent) for men with medium SLI and the lowest (11 percent) for<br />

men with low SLI, while it was 30 percent for men with high SLI.<br />

Those men who had heard of RTI/STI reported source of its information as ‘radio’ (82<br />

percent),’television’ (84 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (35 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/ posters/<br />

wall hoardings’ (11 percent),’doctor’ (23 percent),’health worker’ (nine percent),’school teacher’<br />

(seven percent),’community meeting’ (10 percent) and ‘relatives/friends’ (55 percent).<br />

8.1.1 Knowledge of Mode of Transmission of RTI/STI<br />

Women who were aware of RTI/STI were asked about the mode of its transmission. Table 8.3<br />

gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard of RTI/STI,<br />

knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state. Only eight<br />

percent of the women said’ do not know’ about transmission of RTI/STI in the state – 11 percent in<br />

rural areas and less than one percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not<br />

know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 44 percent for Hindu women as against<br />

over one percent for Muslim women and nine percent for Sikh women, while it was 12 percent for<br />

other caste women. The extent of women who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission<br />

136


Table 8.3 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Homosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />

Heterosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

Lack of personnel<br />

hygiene<br />

Other<br />

Do not know<br />

Number of<br />

women who<br />

have heard<br />

of RTI/STI<br />

Age<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

9.7<br />

24.4<br />

16.2<br />

15.7<br />

14.9<br />

88.4<br />

83.5<br />

85.6<br />

92.9<br />

91.9<br />

36.7<br />

40.8<br />

45.7<br />

46.0<br />

58.3<br />

3.1<br />

4.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.9<br />

9.6<br />

12.3<br />

10.2<br />

4.3<br />

2.2<br />

85<br />

367<br />

498<br />

449<br />

179<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

15.0<br />

23.5<br />

86.9<br />

90.6<br />

41.5<br />

55.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.9<br />

11.2<br />

0.5<br />

1,135<br />

447<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

4.4<br />

9.3<br />

45.5<br />

91.4<br />

92.6<br />

79.3<br />

35.9<br />

68.8<br />

52.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.3<br />

6.1<br />

7.7<br />

7.2<br />

9.4<br />

880<br />

229<br />

473<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Other<br />

30.8<br />

13.8<br />

(45.5)<br />

33.5<br />

39.3<br />

97.2<br />

(90.9)<br />

78.9<br />

28.2<br />

47.6<br />

(75.8)<br />

52.1<br />

1.1<br />

1.9<br />

(18.2)<br />

11.3<br />

43.9<br />

1.4<br />

(9.1)<br />

11.6<br />

232<br />

1,255<br />

34<br />

54<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

19.8<br />

31.4<br />

3.7<br />

21.6<br />

20.5<br />

8.9<br />

39.8<br />

27.9<br />

80.1<br />

96.8<br />

89.9<br />

44.8<br />

91.6<br />

81.8<br />

18.9<br />

49.1<br />

39.0<br />

51.1<br />

32.0<br />

42.4<br />

54.6<br />

3.7<br />

10.4<br />

0.9<br />

2.3<br />

10.7<br />

1.7<br />

3.3<br />

66.6<br />

11.1<br />

1.9<br />

5.5<br />

51.7<br />

7.1<br />

7.3<br />

88<br />

80<br />

424<br />

967<br />

35<br />

1,124<br />

423<br />

Total<br />

17.4<br />

87.9<br />

45.5<br />

2.4<br />

8.2<br />

Note: Total includes 5 women in the 15-19 age group, 7 in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

#Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

1,582<br />

of RTI/STI was 67 percent for scheduled caste women as against 11 percent for scheduled tribe<br />

women and two percent for OBC women, while it was over five percent for other caste women.<br />

Fifty-two percent of women with low SLI as against seven percent of women with medium/high<br />

SLI said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI. The percentage of women who<br />

said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was nine percent for women who had<br />

studied for 10 years and above as against eight percent for non-literate women and seven percent for<br />

women who had studied for 0-9 years. Further, percentage of women who were aware of RTI/STI and<br />

had knowledge about its mode of transmission reported these as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (17 percent),<br />

‘heterosexual intercourse’ (88 percent) and ’lack of personnel hygiene’ (45 percent).<br />

Men who were aware of RTI/STI were asked about the mode of its transmission. Table 8.4<br />

gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of<br />

mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state. Only six percent of the<br />

men said’ do not know’ about transmission of RTI/STI in the state – five percent in rural areas and<br />

seven percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of<br />

137


Table 8.4 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />

Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Age<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45+<br />

Homosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

47.9<br />

35.6<br />

29.8<br />

36.1<br />

Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />

Heterosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

83.0<br />

86.6<br />

85.8<br />

83.1<br />

Lack of personnel<br />

hygiene<br />

47.6<br />

48.4<br />

44.5<br />

43.9<br />

Other<br />

5.5<br />

8.1<br />

5.4<br />

6.0<br />

Do not know<br />

13.1<br />

5.7<br />

5.7<br />

5.7<br />

Number of<br />

men who<br />

have heard<br />

of RTI/STI<br />

47<br />

938<br />

1,518<br />

287<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

32.4<br />

33.8<br />

86.8<br />

82.3<br />

43.0<br />

54.9<br />

5.0<br />

10.7<br />

5.4<br />

7.0<br />

2,125<br />

665<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

8.2<br />

13.8<br />

44.4<br />

92.5<br />

92.8<br />

82.0<br />

39.0<br />

49.5<br />

46.6<br />

1.8<br />

3.0<br />

8.5<br />

6.8<br />

2.8<br />

6.3<br />

488<br />

491<br />

1,809<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

40.8<br />

30.3<br />

57.1<br />

47.0<br />

53.8<br />

90.7<br />

84.4<br />

86.5<br />

39.9<br />

47.3<br />

49.7<br />

27.7<br />

6.7<br />

6.5<br />

5.9<br />

2.1<br />

16.2<br />

4.0<br />

9.5<br />

9.2<br />

354<br />

2,280<br />

72<br />

75<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

37.6<br />

42.0<br />

18.8<br />

36.4<br />

67.7<br />

76.0<br />

89.4<br />

86.5<br />

43.2<br />

30.8<br />

36.9<br />

53.3<br />

17.3<br />

9.0<br />

1.5<br />

7.3<br />

10.1<br />

13.2<br />

2.8<br />

5.4<br />

88<br />

247<br />

646<br />

1,724<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

50.1<br />

25.3<br />

43.3<br />

72.0<br />

92.5<br />

75.6<br />

48.9<br />

47.0<br />

42.5<br />

19.8<br />

4.3<br />

7.0<br />

15.1<br />

3.2<br />

8.7<br />

225<br />

1,722<br />

843<br />

Total<br />

32.7<br />

85.7<br />

45.8<br />

6.4<br />

5.8<br />

2,790<br />

Note1: Total includes 2 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

Note2: Total includes 8 men with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate men with no years of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

transmission of RTI/STI was 16 percent for Hindu men as against four percent for Muslim men<br />

and nine percent for Sikh and also Buddhist men. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />

about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 10 percent for scheduled caste men as against 13<br />

percent for scheduled tribe men and three percent for OBC men, while it was over five percent for<br />

other caste men. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission<br />

of RTI/STI was six percent for men who had studied for 10 years and above as against three<br />

percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years and seven percent for non-literate men. The percentage<br />

of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 15 percent for<br />

men with low SLI as against nine percent for men with high SLI and three percent for men with<br />

medium SLI. Further, percentage of men who were aware of RTI/STI and had knowledge about its<br />

mode of transmission reported these as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (33 percent), ‘heterosexual intercourse’<br />

(86 percent) and ’lack of personnel hygiene’ (46 percent).<br />

8.2 Prevalence of RTI/STI<br />

In DLHS-RCH, information was collected on the common symptoms of reproductive tract infections<br />

138


and sexually transmitted infections from women and their husbands, and information on menstruation<br />

related problems in the three months preceding the survey. The prevalence of reproductive tract<br />

infections and sexually transmitted tract infections is judged by their symptoms. All the respondents<br />

were told about symptoms of RTI/STI, and were asked whether they had any of them. In case of<br />

the presence of at least one symptom, they were further asked whether they sought treatment for<br />

such problems, and if they had sought treatment, details regarding the source of treatment were<br />

also recorded. The topic of RTI/STI is quite sensitive. The culture of silence prevents people from<br />

discussing such topics in front of others. In spite of intensive training of the investigators, the<br />

respondent might have hesitated in reporting the symptoms of RTI/STI. What gets reported in the<br />

survey though may not have given the exact prevalence, but may have given the lower limit for it?<br />

Table 8.5 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who reported<br />

any symptoms of RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three months prior to survey by residence<br />

in the state. The percentage of women who reported any symptom of RTI/STI was 16 percent in<br />

the state – 15 percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas. The symptoms reported were<br />

‘itching over vulva’ (one percent),’boils/ulcer/warts around vulva’ (one percent),’pain in lower<br />

abdomen not related to menses’ (four percent),’low backache’ (over six percent),’pain during<br />

sexual intercourse’ (over one percent),’bleeding after sexual intercourse’ (one percent),’swelling<br />

in the groin’ (over one percent),’frequent/painful passage of urine’ (two percent),’fever’ (seven<br />

percent),’some mass coming out of vagina’ (two percent),’any involuntary escape of urine while<br />

coughing or sneezing’ (over one percent) and ’swelling/lump in breast’ (one percent). Figure 8.2<br />

shows symptoms of RTI/STI among women.<br />

Table 8.5 SYMPTOMS OF RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who reported any symptoms RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three<br />

months prior to survey, according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Symptoms<br />

Percentage of women reported any RTI/STI symptoms<br />

Total<br />

16.0<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

14.9<br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

19.6<br />

Symptoms<br />

Itching over vulva<br />

Boils/ ulcers/ warts around vulva<br />

Pain in lower abdomen not related to menses<br />

Low backache<br />

Pain during sexual intercourse<br />

Bleeding after sexual intercourse<br />

Swelling in the groin<br />

Frequent / painful passage of urine<br />

Fever<br />

Some mass coming out of vagina<br />

Any involuntary escape of urine while coughing or sneezing<br />

Swelling / lump in breast<br />

1.1<br />

0.6<br />

3.7<br />

6.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

1.8<br />

6.6<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.0<br />

0.7<br />

0.5<br />

3.6<br />

5.5<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

1.7<br />

6.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

0.9<br />

2.5<br />

1.1<br />

4.3<br />

9.8<br />

2.7<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.1<br />

7.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

Number of women<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

Table 8.6 and Figure 8.3 show the prevalence of reproductive health problems among husbands<br />

of currently married women. The prevalence of RTI/STI among men was judged by the reporting of<br />

symptoms. The percentage of men who reported any RTI/STI symptoms was six percent in the state<br />

– seven percent in rural areas and over three percent in urban areas. The symptoms reported were<br />

‘any discharge from penis’ (three percent),’any sore/rash/redness on genital or anal areas’ (over one<br />

percent),’difficulty/pain while urinating or very frequent urination’ (one percent),’swelling of testis<br />

or in groin area’ (over one percent) and ‘itching/irritation around genital’ (over two percent).<br />

139


Figure 8.2<br />

Symptomps of RTI/STI among Women<br />

Any RTI/STI symptoms<br />

16<br />

Low backache<br />

Pain in lower abdomen not related to menses<br />

Any involuntary escape of urine while coughing or<br />

sneezing<br />

Frequent / painful passage of urine<br />

Itching over vulva<br />

Pain during sexual intercourse<br />

Fever<br />

Boils/ ulcers/ warts around vulva<br />

Some mass coming out of vagina<br />

Swelling / lump in breast<br />

Swelling in the groin<br />

Bleeding after sexual intercourse<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

7<br />

7<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

Percent<br />

Figure 8.3<br />

Symptomps of RTI/STI among Husbands<br />

Any RTI/STI symptoms<br />

6<br />

Itching / irritation around genital<br />

2<br />

Swelling of testis or in groin area<br />

Difficulty / pain while urinating or very frequent<br />

urination<br />

Any sore / rash / redness on genitals or anal area<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Any discharge from penis<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

3<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Percent<br />

Further, percentage of men who sought treatment for any RTI/STI problem was 54 percent<br />

in the state – 56 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who<br />

sought treatment for any RTI/STI problem from government health facility was 81 percent, from<br />

private health facility nine percent and from ISM facility 12 percent, while eight percent men<br />

sought treatment from a chemist/medical shop. In other words, around 10 percent of the men<br />

sought treatment from more than one health facility. Further, 83 percent men obtained treatment<br />

from doctor, 12 percent from a male health worker, four percent from an ISM practitioner, eight<br />

140


Table 8.6 SYMPTOMS OF RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />

Percentage of husbands of currently married women who reported any symptoms RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three<br />

months prior to survey and sought treatment for RTI/STI by source of treatment, according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Symptoms and treatment<br />

Total<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Percentage of men reported any RTI/STI symptoms<br />

6.2<br />

7.1<br />

3.5<br />

Symptoms<br />

Any discharge from penis<br />

Any sore / rash / redness on genitals or anal area<br />

Difficulty / pain while urinating or very frequent urination<br />

Swelling of testis or in groin area<br />

Itching / irritation around genital<br />

2.6<br />

1.2<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.8<br />

1.4<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

2.9<br />

1.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

Number of men<br />

10,239<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

Percentage of men sought treatment for any RTI/STI 1<br />

54.0<br />

55.6<br />

43.4<br />

Number of men<br />

639<br />

553<br />

86<br />

Percentage sought treatment at health facility 2<br />

Government health facility 3<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

81.0<br />

6.1<br />

2.9<br />

81.4<br />

6.7<br />

3.2<br />

(80.6)<br />

(2.8)<br />

(2.8)<br />

Private health facility 4<br />

9.4<br />

9.5<br />

(13.9)<br />

ISM 5 facility<br />

11.6<br />

9.7<br />

(22.2)<br />

Chemist/ medical shop<br />

7.6<br />

8.0<br />

(5.6)<br />

Other<br />

0.8<br />

0.8<br />

(2.8)<br />

Percentage obtained treatment from 2<br />

Doctor<br />

Male health worker<br />

Traditional healer<br />

Relative/friends<br />

ISM practitioner<br />

Home remedy<br />

Chemist medical shop<br />

Other<br />

82.8<br />

12.1<br />

1.9<br />

1.1<br />

3.7<br />

3.0<br />

8.4<br />

1.1<br />

80.8<br />

13.3<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

3.9<br />

2.8<br />

9.0<br />

1.1<br />

(94.4)<br />

(5.6)<br />

(8.3)<br />

(2.8)<br />

(8.3)<br />

(5.6)<br />

(5.6)<br />

(2.8)<br />

Number of men<br />

349<br />

317<br />

37<br />

1<br />

Based on men with any symptoms of RTI/STI<br />

2<br />

Percentage may add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses and based on who sought treatment.<br />

3<br />

Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre.<br />

4 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic,<br />

5<br />

Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

percent from a chemist/medical shop, two percent from a traditional healer, one percent from<br />

relatives/friends, while three percent men tried home remedy.<br />

The DLHS-RCH also collected information from currently married women on symptoms<br />

of RTIs, that is, on abnormal vaginal discharge, texture, colour and odour of discharge in the three<br />

months immediately preceding the survey. The prevalence of reproductive health problems among<br />

currently married women is estimated from women’s experiences. Table 8.7 gives percentage of<br />

currently married women aged 15-44 years who reported any vaginal discharge during three months<br />

prior to survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment by residence in the<br />

141


Table 8.7 ABNORMAL VAGINAL DISCHARGE<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who reported had any abnormal vaginal discharge during three months prior<br />

to survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Symptoms and treatment<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Percentage of women reported abnormal vaginal discharge<br />

0.9<br />

0.7<br />

1.7<br />

Number of women<br />

10,308<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

Percentage of women sought treatment for vaginal discharge 1<br />

62.1<br />

46.9<br />

(78.7)<br />

Number of women<br />

94<br />

53<br />

41<br />

Percentage sought treatment at health facility 2<br />

Government health facility 3<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

73.2<br />

11.4<br />

9.5<br />

(69.0)<br />

(31.0)<br />

(3.4)<br />

(62.2)<br />

(8.1)<br />

(8.1)<br />

Private health facility 4<br />

33.3<br />

(34.5)<br />

(37.8)<br />

ISM 5 facility<br />

11.3<br />

(6.9)<br />

(16.2)<br />

Home remedy<br />

4.2<br />

(0.0)<br />

(5.4)<br />

Other<br />

6.4<br />

(0.0)<br />

(8.1)<br />

Percent distribution of women who obtained treatment from 2<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />

Other health professionals 6<br />

Other<br />

77.0<br />

19.0<br />

1.3<br />

2.7<br />

(79.3)<br />

(17.2)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(3.4)<br />

(86.5)<br />

(8.1)<br />

(2.7)<br />

(2.7)<br />

Total percent<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

100.0<br />

Number of women<br />

58<br />

25<br />

33<br />

1<br />

Based on women who reported having vaginal discharge. 2 Based on women who sought treatment for vaginal discharge.<br />

3<br />

Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre<br />

and out reach/ MCP clinic in village. 4 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic, chemist/<br />

medical shop. 5 Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine, 6 Includes dai (trained or untrained),<br />

relative or friends and chemist/ medical shop. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

Note: Total includes 49 women with missing information on abnormal vaginal discharge who were not shown separately.<br />

state. The percent of women who reported abnormal vaginal discharge was one percent in the<br />

state – about one percent in rural areas and about two percent in urban area.<br />

Sixty-two percent of the women who reported any symptom of vaginal discharge sought<br />

treatment in the state – 47 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />

women who sought treatment from government health facility was 73 percent, from private health<br />

facility 33 percent, from ISM facility 11 percent and from other health facility six percent, while<br />

four percent women tried home remedy. In other words, one-fourth of the women sought treatment<br />

from more than source. Further, more of women in rural areas sought treatment from private<br />

health facility, while more of women in urban areas sought treatment from ISM health facility.<br />

Again, 77 percent of the women sought treatment from the doctor, 19 percent from ANM/Nurse/<br />

Midwife /LHV and four percent by other health professionals. More of women in urban areas sought<br />

treatment from the doctor, while more of women in rural areas sought treatment from ANM/Nurse/<br />

Midwife /LHV.<br />

142


8.3 Menstruation Related Problems<br />

Table 8.8 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who had any menstruation<br />

related problem during three months prior to survey and percentage who sought treatment and<br />

source of treatment according to place of residence in the state. The percentage of women with<br />

any menstruation related problem was four percent in the state irrespective of place of residence.<br />

Table 8.8 MENSTRUATION RELATED PROBLEMS<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who had any menstruation related problem during three months prior to<br />

survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Symptoms and treatment<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Urban<br />

Percentage of women with any menstruation related problem<br />

3.8<br />

3.7<br />

3.9<br />

Number of Women<br />

7,978<br />

5,492<br />

2,037<br />

Symptoms 1<br />

No period<br />

Painful period<br />

Frequent or short period<br />

Delayed period<br />

Prolonged bleeding<br />

Excessive bleeding<br />

Continuous bleeding<br />

Scanty bleeding<br />

Inter-menstrual bleeding<br />

30.4<br />

38.3<br />

16.8<br />

17.1<br />

5.2<br />

17.4<br />

7.7<br />

4.4<br />

1.0<br />

36.6<br />

27.5<br />

8.7<br />

18.9<br />

6.3<br />

12.5<br />

2.4<br />

4.9<br />

1.4<br />

13.0<br />

68.3<br />

39.6<br />

12.1<br />

2.1<br />

31.1<br />

22.7<br />

3.1<br />

0.1<br />

Percentage of women sought treatment who had any<br />

menstruation related problems<br />

84.7<br />

86.7<br />

79.1<br />

Number of Women<br />

300<br />

221<br />

79<br />

Percentage sought treatment at health facility 6<br />

Government health facility 2<br />

Primary health centre<br />

Sub centre<br />

78.3<br />

3.5<br />

1.9<br />

77.6<br />

4.7<br />

2.5<br />

80.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

Private health facility 3<br />

21.6<br />

24.2<br />

13.8<br />

ISM 4 facility<br />

4.8<br />

3.8<br />

8.0<br />

Other<br />

1.2<br />

1.5<br />

0.0<br />

Percentage of women obtained treatment from 6<br />

Doctor<br />

ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />

Other health professionals 5<br />

Other<br />

87.5<br />

14.3<br />

9.0<br />

1.9<br />

84.4<br />

17.2<br />

11.2<br />

2.5<br />

96.9<br />

5.4<br />

2.3<br />

0.0<br />

Number of women<br />

1<br />

Based on women who reported any menstruated related problems.<br />

2<br />

Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre<br />

and out reach/ MCP clinic in village. 3 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic, chemist/<br />

medical shop. 4 Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine, 5 Includes dai (trained or untrained),<br />

relative or friends and chemist/ medical shop. 6 Multiple responses.<br />

Note: Total includes 4 woman with missing information on any menstruation problem who were not shown separately<br />

Among the women who had any menstrual problems reported as ’no period’ (30 percent),<br />

’painful period’ (38 percent),’frequent or short period’ (17 percent),’delayed period’ (17 percent),<br />

’prolonged period’ (five percent),’excessive bleeding’ (17 percent),’continuous bleeding’ (eight<br />

254<br />

191<br />

62<br />

143


percent),’scanty bleeding’ (over four percent) and ’inter-menstrual bleeding’ (one percent). The<br />

percentage of women who had any menstrual related problems and sought treatment was 85<br />

percent in the state – 87 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />

women who sought treatment from government health facility was 78 percent, from private<br />

health facility 22 percent, from ISM facility five percent and from other health facility over one<br />

percent. In other words, six percent of the women sought treatment from more than one health<br />

facility. Further, percentage of the women who sought treatment was 87 percent from the doctor,<br />

14 percent from ANM/Nurse/Midwife/LHV, nine percent from other health professional and two<br />

percent from other.<br />

8.4 Prevalence of RTIs/STIs by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 8.9 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands who reported<br />

reproductive health problems and percentage who sought treatment for the problems by district<br />

in the state. The percentage of women with any symptoms of RTI/STI was the highest (27 percent)<br />

in Kargil and Udhampur districts, followed by 26 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (two<br />

percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was 16 percent for the state. Further, percentage<br />

of women who reported any abnormal vaginal discharge was the highest (eight percent) in Leh<br />

district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kupwara, Pulwama, Poonch, and<br />

Srinagar districts, while it was one percent for the state. The percentage of women who sought<br />

treatment for abnormal vaginal discharge was the highest (100 percent) in Rajouri district,<br />

followed by 80 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district, while it<br />

was 62 percent for the state.<br />

Further, percentage of men with any symptoms of RTI/STI was the highest<br />

(14 percent) in Udhanpur district, followed by 13 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero<br />

percent) in Baramula district, while it was six percent for the state. The percentage of men who<br />

Table 8.9 REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE INDICATORS BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of currently married women and their husbands who reported reproductive health problems and percentage who sought<br />

treatment for the problems by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

With any<br />

symptoms of<br />

RTI/STI<br />

22.3<br />

15.4<br />

(1.9)<br />

(2.1)<br />

25.7<br />

Percentage of women<br />

Reported any<br />

abnormal vaginal<br />

discharge<br />

(1.3)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.1)<br />

(1.7)<br />

Sought treatment<br />

for abnormal<br />

vaginal discharge<br />

(76.8)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

(0.0)<br />

46.7<br />

Percentage of men<br />

With any<br />

symptoms of<br />

RTI/STI<br />

8.5<br />

12.0<br />

0.0<br />

3.3<br />

5.2<br />

Sought treatment for<br />

RTI/STI problems<br />

65.5<br />

72.1<br />

-<br />

16.8<br />

47.5<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

27.2<br />

4.4<br />

22.2<br />

19.6<br />

21.4<br />

(2.4)<br />

4.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

7.9<br />

(0.0)<br />

(68.1)<br />

(80.3)<br />

-<br />

(18.2)<br />

-<br />

13.2<br />

0.7<br />

8.7<br />

6.9<br />

9.0<br />

93.4<br />

(17.9)<br />

34.3<br />

28.5<br />

34.3<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

20.5<br />

3.7<br />

13.1<br />

27.5<br />

(0.0)<br />

(0.1)<br />

(0.0)<br />

(2.2)<br />

-<br />

(100.0)<br />

-<br />

(69.0)<br />

0.7<br />

2.5<br />

8.2<br />

14.4<br />

(0.0)<br />

(17.8)<br />

70.9<br />

55.2<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

16.0<br />

0.9<br />

62.1<br />

6.2<br />

54.0<br />

( ) Based on less number of cases. - Not Applicable.<br />

144


sought treatment for RTI/STI was the highest (93 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 72<br />

percent in Badgam district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district, while it was 54<br />

percent for the state.<br />

8.5 HIV/AIDS<br />

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is an illness caused by the Human Immune<br />

Virus (HIV), which weakens the immune system and leads to death through secondary infection<br />

such as tuberculosis or pneumonia. The virus is generally transmitted through sexual contact, through<br />

the placenta of HIV-infected women to their children, or through contact with contaminated needle<br />

(injections) or blood. Prevalence of HIV and AIDS has been on the rise for more than a decade in<br />

India and has reached alarming proportions in recent years. To prevent HIV transmission, the<br />

government has been making various efforts.<br />

DLHS-RCH has collected information on the general state of awareness of HIV/AIDS,<br />

its transmission, its prevention and common misconceptions about HIV/AIDS. All the currently<br />

married women in the age group 15-44, and their husbands were first asked if they had ever<br />

heard of an illness called HIV/AIDS. Respondents who had heard of HIV/AIDS were further asked<br />

about their source of information, mode of transmission, and correct knowledge of HIV/AIDS<br />

transfusion.<br />

8.5.1 Knowledge of HIV/AIDS<br />

Table 8.10 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific sources by selected background<br />

characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Fifty-four percent of the currently married women<br />

have heard of HIV/AIDS in the state, which is higher than RCH Round–I. In Round-I only 35<br />

percent currently married women were aware of HIV/AIDS.<br />

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS among women was 54 percent in the state – 48 percent in rural<br />

areas and 71 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was<br />

the highest (63 percent) for women aged 20-24 years, followed by 59 percent for women aged 25-29<br />

years and the lowest (41 percent) for women aged 40-44 years. The percentage of women who have<br />

heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (90 percent) for Buddhist women, followed by 76 percent for<br />

Sikh women and the lowest (51 percent) for other caste women, while 53 percent of Hindu/Muslim<br />

women have heard about it. Forty-eight percent of scheduled caste women as against 40 percent of<br />

scheduled tribe women and 57 percent of OBC women have heard about HIV/AIDS, while it was 58<br />

percent for other caste women.<br />

Further, percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (76<br />

percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (45 percent) for nonliterate<br />

women, while it was 56 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />

percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (65 percent) for women<br />

with high SLI and the lowest (35 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 56 percent for<br />

women with medium SLI. These data have shown that percentage of women who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS increases with increase in education and standard of living index of the women. This<br />

suggests that exists positive association between percent of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />

and education and standard of living index of the women.<br />

145


Table 8.10 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />

Percentage of currently married women aged 15 - 44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS and among women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific<br />

sources by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />

Background characteristic<br />

Percentage<br />

who have<br />

heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Number of<br />

Women<br />

Radio<br />

Among those who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from.<br />

Television<br />

Newspaper/<br />

Books/<br />

Magazines<br />

Slogan/<br />

Pamphlets/<br />

Posters/ Wall<br />

Hoardings<br />

Doctor<br />

<strong>Health</strong><br />

worker<br />

School<br />

teacher<br />

Community<br />

Meeting<br />

Relative/<br />

Friends<br />

Others<br />

Number of<br />

women who<br />

have heard<br />

about<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Age group (years)<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

53.4<br />

63.3<br />

59.3<br />

57.1<br />

50.4<br />

40.7<br />

48.5<br />

70.8<br />

44.9<br />

56.3<br />

76.1<br />

52.6<br />

52.9<br />

75.7<br />

90.4<br />

(51.3)<br />

48.1<br />

39.6<br />

57.3<br />

58.4<br />

34.9<br />

55.7<br />

64.6<br />

63<br />

834<br />

2,444<br />

2,657<br />

2,727<br />

1,583<br />

7,851<br />

2,457<br />

6,202<br />

1,830<br />

2,273<br />

3,599<br />

6,297<br />

264<br />

117<br />

30<br />

1,157<br />

1,365<br />

1,765<br />

5,855<br />

2,156<br />

5,285<br />

2,867<br />

(41.9)<br />

60.5<br />

81.0<br />

78.4<br />

81.7<br />

70.1<br />

80.8<br />

68.8<br />

83.9<br />

68.3<br />

71.2<br />

59.5<br />

87.8<br />

70.9<br />

65.5<br />

*<br />

72.2<br />

51.8<br />

82.5<br />

80.1<br />

63.9<br />

85.7<br />

68.6<br />

(93.5)<br />

91.7<br />

87.5<br />

86.1<br />

84.9<br />

81.0<br />

85.6<br />

87.4<br />

81.8<br />

88.1<br />

91.9<br />

87.0<br />

85.4<br />

91.5<br />

82.7<br />

*<br />

91.8<br />

91.7<br />

80.8<br />

85.8<br />

73.0<br />

88.1<br />

88.3<br />

(19.4)<br />

19.6<br />

29.8<br />

25.9<br />

22.8<br />

27.5<br />

20.1<br />

37.7<br />

10.3<br />

20.1<br />

53.5<br />

38.3<br />

17.0<br />

42.8<br />

40.4<br />

*<br />

25.8<br />

32.7<br />

15.7<br />

27.5<br />

23.7<br />

16.3<br />

41.2<br />

(16.1)<br />

8.0<br />

15.6<br />

17.3<br />

11.6<br />

16.2<br />

10.5<br />

22.8<br />

6.6<br />

7.1<br />

31.3<br />

23.6<br />

9.0<br />

13.4<br />

21.6<br />

*<br />

15.9<br />

22.3<br />

6.2<br />

15.4<br />

14.6<br />

7.8<br />

24.8<br />

(48.4)<br />

31.4<br />

25.8<br />

20.2<br />

24.5<br />

23.5<br />

26.0<br />

20.7<br />

24.9<br />

18.8<br />

26.8<br />

19.1<br />

28.1<br />

19.7<br />

9.1<br />

*<br />

20.9<br />

39.5<br />

21.2<br />

23.5<br />

42.3<br />

20.9<br />

22.5<br />

(9.7)<br />

7.8<br />

12.7<br />

13.4<br />

12.5<br />

9.6<br />

12.2<br />

11.4<br />

10.2<br />

11.3<br />

15.2<br />

10.9<br />

13.0<br />

10.5<br />

3.6<br />

*<br />

12.3<br />

22.6<br />

8.4<br />

11.3<br />

17.5<br />

10.8<br />

11.7<br />

(0.0)<br />

4.0<br />

8.8<br />

10.9<br />

8.9<br />

5.0<br />

8.6<br />

8.2<br />

8.7<br />

4.9<br />

10.2<br />

4.6<br />

11.0<br />

6.7<br />

2.1<br />

*<br />

8.6<br />

19.4<br />

6.6<br />

7.2<br />

17.9<br />

7.4<br />

6.3<br />

(6.5)<br />

9.6<br />

9.7<br />

10.4<br />

8.0<br />

6.8<br />

8.6<br />

10.0<br />

8.6<br />

7.4<br />

10.9<br />

7.8<br />

9.9<br />

11.9<br />

2.1<br />

*<br />

8.5<br />

6.8<br />

8.2<br />

9.7<br />

11.5<br />

8.6<br />

8.8<br />

(54.8)<br />

61.1<br />

55.6<br />

53.9<br />

62.9<br />

58.7<br />

58.7<br />

56.0<br />

65.8<br />

57.9<br />

45.0<br />

42.4<br />

69.2<br />

42.5<br />

7.3<br />

*<br />

37.4<br />

41.2<br />

62.8<br />

62.4<br />

53.0<br />

65.3<br />

48.1<br />

(3.2)<br />

3.9<br />

5.7<br />

4.8<br />

5.5<br />

5.7<br />

3.9<br />

8.4<br />

5.4<br />

2.7<br />

6.5<br />

4.6<br />

5.9<br />

3.4<br />

0.4<br />

*<br />

3.9<br />

2.5<br />

5.8<br />

5.8<br />

6.4<br />

4.4<br />

6.1<br />

34<br />

528<br />

1,449<br />

1,518<br />

1,374<br />

645<br />

3,807<br />

1,739<br />

2,787<br />

1,030<br />

1,729<br />

1,892<br />

3,333<br />

200<br />

105<br />

16<br />

557<br />

541<br />

1,011<br />

3,418<br />

752<br />

2,944<br />

1,851<br />

Total<br />

53.8<br />

10,308<br />

77.0<br />

86.1<br />

25.6<br />

14.4<br />

24.3<br />

12.0<br />

8.5<br />

9.1<br />

57.9<br />

5.3<br />

5,547<br />

Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />

146


The government has been using mass media, such as television, radio, and newspaper<br />

extensively to increase awareness among the general public about HIV/AIDS and its prevention.<br />

The women who were aware of HIV/AIDS reported sources of information as ‘radio’ (77 percent),<br />

’television’ (86percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (26 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />

hoardings’ (14 percent),’doctor’ (24 percent),’health worker’ (12 percent),’school teacher’ (eight<br />

percent),’community meeting’ (nine percent),’relations/friends’ (58 percent). The mass media and<br />

print media are the main sources of awareness about HIV/AIDS of the women.<br />

Table 8.11 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard<br />

about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific sources by selected background<br />

characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />

was 65 percent as against 48 percent in RCH Round-I.<br />

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS among men was 68 percent in the state – 64 percent in rural<br />

areas and 82 percent in urban areas (Figure 8.4). The percentage of men who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS was 63 percent for men aged below 25 years as against 72 percent for men aged 25-<br />

34 years and 67 percent for men aged 35-44 years, while it was 83 percent for women aged 45<br />

years and above. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (94<br />

percent) for Buddhist, followed by 92 percent for Sikh and the lowest (65 percent) for Hindus,<br />

while it was 68 percent for Muslims. Sixty-two percent of scheduled caste men as against 34<br />

percent of scheduled tribe men and 71 percent of OBC men have heard about HIV/AIDS, while<br />

it was 77 percent for other caste men. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />

was the highest (85 percent) for men who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (50<br />

percent) for non-literate men, while it was 66 percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years.<br />

Similarly, percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (80 percent) for<br />

men with high SLI and the lowest (46 percent) for men with low SLI, while it was 70 percent for<br />

men with medium SLI. These data suggest that there exists positive association between percent<br />

of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS and education and standard of living index of men.<br />

Figure 8.4<br />

Awarness of HIV/AIDS by Sex According to Residence<br />

Total<br />

Women<br />

54<br />

Men<br />

68<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Women<br />

49<br />

Men<br />

64<br />

Urban<br />

Women<br />

71<br />

Men<br />

82<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percent<br />

147


Table 8.11 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />

Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about RTI/STI and among men who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources<br />

by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />

Background Characteristic<br />

Percentage<br />

who have<br />

heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Number of<br />

men<br />

Radio<br />

Television<br />

Among those who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from.<br />

Newspaper/<br />

Books/<br />

Magazines<br />

Slogan/<br />

Pamphlets/<br />

Posters/ Wall<br />

Hoardings<br />

Doctor<br />

<strong>Health</strong><br />

worker<br />

School<br />

teacher<br />

Community<br />

Meeting<br />

Relative/<br />

Friends<br />

Others<br />

Number of<br />

men who<br />

have heard<br />

about<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Age group (years)<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Other<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

63.5<br />

71.8<br />

66.7<br />

63.2<br />

63.7<br />

81.7<br />

50.4<br />

66.2<br />

84.9<br />

65.2<br />

67.7<br />

92.4<br />

94.4<br />

(70.0)<br />

62.1<br />

34.0<br />

71.4<br />

77.4<br />

46.4<br />

70.0<br />

80.2<br />

181<br />

3,549<br />

5,257<br />

1,251<br />

7,801<br />

2,438<br />

3,797<br />

2,252<br />

4,174<br />

3,394<br />

6,367<br />

301<br />

146<br />

30<br />

1,075<br />

1,391<br />

1,736<br />

5,830<br />

2,119<br />

5,272<br />

2,847<br />

79.1<br />

83.0<br />

83.9<br />

76.3<br />

87.0<br />

71.8<br />

91.7<br />

80.4<br />

78.8<br />

64.4<br />

92.9<br />

76.2<br />

67.6<br />

*<br />

69.9<br />

74.8<br />

87.3<br />

84.2<br />

84.5<br />

89.8<br />

70.2<br />

92.5<br />

87.7<br />

87.4<br />

89.0<br />

86.9<br />

89.9<br />

82.3<br />

87.0<br />

90.9<br />

87.7<br />

87.5<br />

94.4<br />

82.2<br />

*<br />

89.1<br />

79.8<br />

85.1<br />

89.1<br />

72.2<br />

91.7<br />

88.1<br />

36.3<br />

37.0<br />

34.5<br />

41.1<br />

31.0<br />

49.2<br />

9.8<br />

24.3<br />

55.4<br />

50.3<br />

27.7<br />

53.2<br />

41.6<br />

*<br />

39.0<br />

32.2<br />

27.1<br />

38.9<br />

22.2<br />

29.5<br />

53.0<br />

16.4<br />

19.5<br />

18.0<br />

22.7<br />

14.7<br />

29.8<br />

7.4<br />

9.7<br />

29.3<br />

30.9<br />

12.8<br />

20.1<br />

22.9<br />

*<br />

25.3<br />

18.6<br />

7.5<br />

21.6<br />

18.1<br />

11.9<br />

31.0<br />

13.0<br />

24.5<br />

22.1<br />

21.8<br />

23.9<br />

19.9<br />

23.5<br />

16.4<br />

25.1<br />

18.0<br />

25.7<br />

22.1<br />

12.1<br />

*<br />

15.4<br />

12.7<br />

21.0<br />

25.6<br />

24.3<br />

22.1<br />

23.3<br />

10.9<br />

12.8<br />

12.4<br />

11.0<br />

11.8<br />

13.7<br />

11.1<br />

12.4<br />

13.1<br />

9.5<br />

14.0<br />

13.7<br />

7.0<br />

*<br />

8.4<br />

13.9<br />

9.3<br />

13.7<br />

13.0<br />

12.3<br />

12.2<br />

5.6<br />

8.1<br />

8.2<br />

6.8<br />

8.2<br />

7.2<br />

6.5<br />

4.3<br />

10.2<br />

3.4<br />

10.1<br />

12.1<br />

4.8<br />

*<br />

4.9<br />

8.4<br />

4.5<br />

9.4<br />

9.2<br />

8.5<br />

6.4<br />

6.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.3<br />

8.6<br />

10.4<br />

11.3<br />

9.0<br />

8.1<br />

12.6<br />

7.7<br />

12.3<br />

13.3<br />

3.3<br />

*<br />

9.9<br />

10.8<br />

10.8<br />

10.8<br />

8.7<br />

11.9<br />

9.5<br />

53.9<br />

55.0<br />

53.5<br />

44.3<br />

52.1<br />

55.4<br />

60.8<br />

54.9<br />

48.1<br />

45.4<br />

58.9<br />

46.1<br />

7.7<br />

*<br />

40.9<br />

14.4<br />

57.2<br />

58.2<br />

43.4<br />

58.7<br />

47.9<br />

1.7<br />

4.3<br />

4.7<br />

3.2<br />

3.5<br />

6.3<br />

6.2<br />

1.7<br />

4.4<br />

2.2<br />

5.1<br />

10.5<br />

0.7<br />

*<br />

3.4<br />

2.2<br />

3.6<br />

4.9<br />

6.2<br />

3.8<br />

4.4<br />

115<br />

2,549<br />

3,5<strong>04</strong><br />

791<br />

4,967<br />

1,993<br />

1,912<br />

1,492<br />

3,544<br />

2,212<br />

4,309<br />

279<br />

138<br />

21<br />

667<br />

473<br />

1,241<br />

4,510<br />

983<br />

3,693<br />

2,283<br />

Total<br />

68.0<br />

10,239<br />

82.6<br />

87.7<br />

36.2<br />

19.0<br />

22.8<br />

12.4<br />

7.9<br />

10.7<br />

53.0<br />

4.3<br />

6,959<br />

Note: Table includes 16 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to don’t and missing cases. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

* Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />

148


The government has been using mass media, such as television, radio, and newspaper<br />

extensively to increase awareness among the general public about HIV/AIDS and its prevention.<br />

The men who were aware of HIV/AIDS reported sources of information as ‘radio’ (83 percent),<br />

’television’(88 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’(36 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />

hoardings’ (19 percent),’doctor’ (23 percent),’health worker’ (12 percent),’school teacher’ (eight<br />

percent),’community meeting’ (11 percent),’relations/friends’ (53 percent). The mass media and<br />

print media are the main sources of awareness about HIV/AIDS of the women.<br />

8.5.2 Knowledge of Mode of Transmission about HIV/AIDS<br />

Table 8.12 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state.<br />

The percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was<br />

over five percent in the state – seven percent in rural areas and three percent in urban areas. The<br />

percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was the<br />

lowest (three percent) in the age group 20-24 years and the highest (nine percent) in the age group<br />

40-44 years. Seven percent of Hindu women as against five percent of Muslim women and over<br />

four percent for Sikh women said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while<br />

it was six percent for Buddhist women. Similarly, eight percent of scheduled caste women as<br />

against seven percent of scheduled tribe women and over five percent of OBC women said ’do not<br />

know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while it was five percent for other caste women.<br />

The percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was<br />

eight percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against over three percent for women<br />

who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was six percent for non-literate women. Similarly,<br />

percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was six<br />

percent for women with low and medium SLI as against five percent for women with high SLI.<br />

Among women who were aware of mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS reported different<br />

ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (44 percent),‘heterosexual intercourse’<br />

(76 percent),’needles/blades/skin puncture’ (44 percent),’mother to child’ (49 percent), ’transfusion<br />

of infected blood’ (55 percent) and ‘other’ (13 percent).<br />

Table 8.13 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the<br />

state. The percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />

was six percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and five percent in urban areas. The<br />

percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was the<br />

lowest (five percent) in the age group 25-34 years and the highest (nine percent) in the age group<br />

45 years and above. Nine percent of Hindu men as against five percent of Muslim men and two<br />

percent of Sikh men said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while it was<br />

three percent for Buddhist men. Seven percent of scheduled caste men as against five percent of<br />

scheduled tribe men and six percent of OBS and other caste men said ‘do not know’ about mode of<br />

transmission of HIV/AIDS. The percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of<br />

transmission of HIV/AIDS was the highest (nine percent) for men who had studied for 0-9 years<br />

and the lowest (over three percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it<br />

was eight percent for non-literate men. Similarly, percentage of men who said ’do not know’<br />

about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was eight percent for men with low SLI as against five<br />

percent for men with medium SLI, while it was six percent for men with high SLI.<br />

149


Table 8.12 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />

Percentage currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard of HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Age<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhis<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Homo<br />

sexual<br />

intercourse<br />

(29.0)<br />

37.3<br />

47.4<br />

45.1<br />

41.8<br />

44.0<br />

38.1<br />

57.0<br />

39.3<br />

37.3<br />

55.5<br />

54.5<br />

38.2<br />

46.9<br />

33.0<br />

44.4<br />

29.0<br />

30.8<br />

50.3<br />

45.3<br />

37.5<br />

53.8<br />

Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />

Hetero<br />

sexual<br />

intercourse<br />

(80.6)<br />

71.7<br />

75.3<br />

77.0<br />

78.1<br />

76.1<br />

75.3<br />

78.3<br />

84.3<br />

68.8<br />

67.6<br />

59.8<br />

86.8<br />

54.3<br />

80.0<br />

51.3<br />

83.9<br />

80.7<br />

77.7<br />

76.5<br />

82.7<br />

65.9<br />

Needles/<br />

blade/ skin<br />

puncture<br />

(77.4)<br />

54.9<br />

46.3<br />

41.2<br />

38.3<br />

45.2<br />

41.2<br />

49.3<br />

35.8<br />

47.3<br />

54.4<br />

48.7<br />

40.1<br />

54.6<br />

49.0<br />

52.2<br />

72.7<br />

30.4<br />

41.7<br />

52.7<br />

38.9<br />

47.8<br />

Mother<br />

to<br />

child<br />

(29.0)<br />

37.7<br />

48.3<br />

52.0<br />

52.0<br />

51.0<br />

45.0<br />

58.9<br />

46.3<br />

55.0<br />

50.9<br />

42.1<br />

54.3<br />

50.2<br />

24.3<br />

42.8<br />

25.3<br />

54.8<br />

52.8<br />

34.0<br />

53.0<br />

49.9<br />

Transfusion<br />

of<br />

infected<br />

blood<br />

(22.6)<br />

46.8<br />

54.8<br />

53.7<br />

60.9<br />

56.8<br />

54.0<br />

57.9<br />

53.9<br />

61.0<br />

53.9<br />

47.4<br />

60.7<br />

60.5<br />

12.6<br />

55.1<br />

24.6<br />

57.2<br />

59.8<br />

44.9<br />

58.8<br />

53.7<br />

Other<br />

(9.7)<br />

8.9<br />

12.4<br />

12.8<br />

13.5<br />

14.8<br />

9.4<br />

19.8<br />

10.6<br />

16.2<br />

13.9<br />

13.6<br />

12.6<br />

10.2<br />

3.3<br />

14.3<br />

21.0<br />

11.8<br />

11.4<br />

16.6<br />

11.8<br />

12.4<br />

Do<br />

not<br />

know<br />

(0.0)<br />

2.9<br />

4.6<br />

4.3<br />

7.4<br />

9.1<br />

6.8<br />

2.7<br />

6.0<br />

7.8<br />

3.4<br />

6.8<br />

4.9<br />

4.3<br />

6.2<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

5.5<br />

4.9<br />

6.1<br />

5.9<br />

4.7<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

who have<br />

heard of<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

34<br />

528<br />

1,449<br />

1,518<br />

1,374<br />

645<br />

3,807<br />

1,739<br />

2,787<br />

1,030<br />

1,729<br />

1,892<br />

3,333<br />

200<br />

105<br />

557<br />

541<br />

1,011<br />

3,418<br />

752<br />

2,944<br />

1,851<br />

Total<br />

44.0<br />

76.2<br />

43.7<br />

49.4<br />

55.2<br />

12.7<br />

5.5<br />

5,547<br />

Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases. @ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

Among men who were aware of mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS and reported different<br />

ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS such as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (50 percent),‘heterosexual<br />

intercourse’ (77 percent),’needles/blades/skin puncture’ (47 percent),’mother to child’ (52 percent),<br />

’transfusion of infected blood’ (59 percent) and ‘other’ (13 percent). These data clearly bring out<br />

rural-urban differentials in the responses about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS.<br />

8.5.3 How to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />

All the respondents, male and female, were asked about how to prevent HIV/AIDS. The percentage<br />

of women who said that HIV/AIDS could be avoided by various ways has been presented in Table<br />

8.14 by selected background characteristics. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />

how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent in the state – five percent in rural areas and four<br />

percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />

was the highest (10 percent) for women aged 40-44 years and the lowest (two percent) for<br />

women aged 20-24 years. The percentage of women who ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />

was five percent for non-literate women and women who had studied for 0-9 years as against<br />

over three percent for women who had studied for 10 years and above. The percentage of women<br />

150


Table 8.13 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />

Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of HIV/AIDS , knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />

background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Age<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45+<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

Homosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

56.4<br />

53.6<br />

46.6<br />

50.7<br />

46.0<br />

59.2<br />

46.5<br />

41.8<br />

54.9<br />

58.3<br />

44.7<br />

62.5<br />

44.5<br />

Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />

Heterosexual<br />

intercourse<br />

67.9<br />

79.6<br />

77.4<br />

70.5<br />

76.9<br />

78.2<br />

80.9<br />

73.3<br />

77.0<br />

60.6<br />

86.2<br />

65.9<br />

89.1<br />

Needles/<br />

blade/ skin<br />

puncture<br />

48.6<br />

48.2<br />

44.1<br />

52.6<br />

43.3<br />

54.9<br />

27.7<br />

43.4<br />

58.2<br />

54.7<br />

42.2<br />

49.5<br />

48.6<br />

Mother<br />

to child<br />

52.7<br />

50.7<br />

52.7<br />

56.3<br />

48.5<br />

61.9<br />

41.3<br />

54.3<br />

57.5<br />

46.6<br />

57.3<br />

38.9<br />

17.4<br />

Transfusion of<br />

infected blood<br />

55.3<br />

60.0<br />

57.8<br />

59.1<br />

56.1<br />

65.2<br />

55.9<br />

57.8<br />

60.5<br />

55.6<br />

62.3<br />

54.1<br />

10.8<br />

Other<br />

10.5<br />

14.0<br />

12.2<br />

15.4<br />

10.1<br />

20.8<br />

11.1<br />

11.3<br />

15.1<br />

14.8<br />

12.9<br />

10.4<br />

3.7<br />

Do not<br />

know<br />

8.5<br />

4.9<br />

5.7<br />

8.8<br />

6.2<br />

4.8<br />

7.6<br />

9.4<br />

3.3<br />

8.8<br />

4.6<br />

1.7<br />

2.7<br />

Number of<br />

men who<br />

have heard<br />

of HIV/AIDS<br />

115<br />

2,549<br />

3,5<strong>04</strong><br />

791<br />

4,967<br />

1,993<br />

1,912<br />

1,492<br />

3,544<br />

2,212<br />

4,309<br />

279<br />

138<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

54.0<br />

47.7<br />

35.8<br />

53.2<br />

58.4<br />

75.3<br />

81.0<br />

79.1<br />

57.1<br />

50.7<br />

27.9<br />

49.8<br />

48.2<br />

37.5<br />

55.5<br />

53.7<br />

57.4<br />

30.4<br />

56.6<br />

62.9<br />

15.2<br />

20.8<br />

10.9<br />

12.6<br />

6.7<br />

4.9<br />

6.1<br />

5.7<br />

667<br />

473<br />

1,241<br />

4,510<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

59.4<br />

43.0<br />

56.6<br />

75.7<br />

82.6<br />

69.3<br />

41.8<br />

42.8<br />

55.0<br />

37.7<br />

55.1<br />

54.3<br />

46.9<br />

61.0<br />

60.2<br />

15.7<br />

11.7<br />

14.5<br />

8.1<br />

5.4<br />

5.6<br />

983<br />

3,693<br />

2,283<br />

Total<br />

49.8 77.3 46.6 52.4 58.7 13.2 5.8 6,959<br />

Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in other<br />

religion who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to<br />

N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was about five percent irrespective of the<br />

household standard of living index of the women. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />

how to avoid HIV/AIDS was six percent for Hindu women as against four percent for Muslim<br />

women and two percent for Sikh women, while it was five percent for Buddhist. The percentage<br />

of women who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was four percent for scheduled-caste<br />

women as against over five percent for scheduled tribe women and over three percent for OBC<br />

women, while it was five percent for other caste women.<br />

Further, percentage of women who reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘sex with only<br />

one partner’ (81 percent),’using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ (69 percent),<br />

‘sterilizing needles and syringe for injection’ (42 percent each),‘checking blood prior to<br />

transfusion’ (60 percent) and ‘avoiding pregnancy when having HIV/AIDS’ (45 percent). All the<br />

specific ways except ‘using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />

reported by women were higher in urban areas than in rural areas. However, percentage of<br />

women who said HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘using condom correctly during each sexual<br />

intercourse’ was higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />

151


Table 8.14 KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AVOIDANCE OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />

Among currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of women reported HIV/AIDS can be<br />

avoided in specific ways by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Sex<br />

With<br />

Only<br />

one partner<br />

Percentage reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by:<br />

Using<br />

condoms<br />

correctly<br />

during each<br />

sexual<br />

intercourse<br />

Checking<br />

blood prior to<br />

transfusion<br />

Sterilizing<br />

needles and<br />

syringes<br />

for injection<br />

Avoiding<br />

pregnancy<br />

when having<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Other<br />

Do not<br />

know<br />

To<br />

avoid<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

women<br />

Age<br />

15-19<br />

20-24<br />

25-29<br />

30-34<br />

35-39<br />

40-44<br />

(83.9)<br />

71.3<br />

86.5<br />

82.2<br />

80.7<br />

78.1<br />

(77.4)<br />

76.7<br />

71.5<br />

69.0<br />

69.0<br />

59.4<br />

(22.6)<br />

53.9<br />

62.6<br />

62.1<br />

61.6<br />

56.6<br />

(32.3)<br />

36.3<br />

47.0<br />

41.5<br />

37.9<br />

42.1<br />

(19.4)<br />

38.3<br />

40.5<br />

47.4<br />

48.7<br />

45.5<br />

(6.5)<br />

12.7<br />

13.2<br />

13.3<br />

12.8<br />

13.6<br />

(3.2)<br />

2.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.7<br />

5.0<br />

10.4<br />

34<br />

528<br />

1,449<br />

1,518<br />

1,374<br />

645<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

79.7<br />

85.4<br />

72.4<br />

62.4<br />

57.4<br />

67.1<br />

38.6<br />

48.2<br />

41.5<br />

51.3<br />

9.3<br />

21.4<br />

4.9<br />

4.2<br />

3,807<br />

1,739<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

80.4<br />

81.7<br />

83.2<br />

73.7<br />

62.5<br />

66.2<br />

61.0<br />

57.2<br />

61.4<br />

32.1<br />

47.9<br />

53.1<br />

46.9<br />

47.2<br />

39.3<br />

12.9<br />

12.9<br />

13.4<br />

5.1<br />

5.4<br />

3.5<br />

2,787<br />

1,030<br />

1,729<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

82.5<br />

82.9<br />

82.8<br />

19.1<br />

61.3<br />

73.7<br />

68.5<br />

74.0<br />

50.0<br />

66.4<br />

60.2<br />

59.9<br />

50.3<br />

36.5<br />

51.7<br />

22.6<br />

32.3<br />

53.3<br />

36.7<br />

8.2<br />

11.4<br />

14.6<br />

10.7<br />

1.8<br />

5.6<br />

4.3<br />

2.0<br />

4.9<br />

1,892<br />

3,333<br />

200<br />

105<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

83.2<br />

43.0<br />

87.0<br />

85.6<br />

72.3<br />

76.0<br />

71.2<br />

67.0<br />

52.1<br />

43.5<br />

63.4<br />

63.7<br />

53.2<br />

30.1<br />

32.1<br />

44.5<br />

31.2<br />

14.7<br />

53.6<br />

49.0<br />

14.2<br />

11.6<br />

13.3<br />

13.1<br />

4.0<br />

5.5<br />

3.3<br />

5.1<br />

557<br />

541<br />

1,011<br />

3,418<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

66.5<br />

84.4<br />

82.9<br />

83.4<br />

71.2<br />

60.6<br />

45.4<br />

65.5<br />

58.4<br />

35.7<br />

38.7<br />

48.7<br />

29.5<br />

52.5<br />

38.0<br />

18.7<br />

11.8<br />

12.8<br />

5.1<br />

4.5<br />

4.8<br />

752<br />

2,944<br />

1851<br />

Total<br />

81.5<br />

69.3<br />

60.4<br />

41.6<br />

44.6<br />

13.1<br />

4.7<br />

5,547<br />

Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />

@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />

# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

Table 8.15 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, percentage of men who reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided in specific ways by<br />

selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’<br />

how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent in the state – over five percent in rural areas and over<br />

four percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid<br />

HIV/AIDS was over 11 percent for men aged below 25 years, while it was around five percent<br />

for other age groups. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was<br />

seven percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years as against three percent for men who had<br />

studied for 10 years and above, while it was eight percent for non-literate men. The percentage of<br />

men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was seven percent for Hindus as against<br />

152


Table 8.15 KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AVOIDANCE OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />

Among husbands of currently married women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of men reported HIV/AIDS can be<br />

avoided in specific ways by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background<br />

characteristic<br />

Sex with<br />

only one<br />

partner<br />

Percentage reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by:<br />

Using condoms<br />

correctly during<br />

each sexual<br />

intercourse<br />

Checking<br />

blood prior to<br />

transfusion<br />

Sterilizing<br />

needles and<br />

syringes for<br />

injection<br />

Avoiding<br />

pregnancy<br />

when having<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Other<br />

Do not<br />

know to<br />

avoid<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Number<br />

of men<br />

Age<br />

Below 25<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45+<br />

81.6<br />

85.8<br />

81.7<br />

83.3<br />

66.3<br />

73.6<br />

71.7<br />

66.8<br />

56.7<br />

63.7<br />

63.1<br />

58.5<br />

38.1<br />

47.2<br />

43.1<br />

47.1<br />

35.5<br />

44.3<br />

45.6<br />

46.5<br />

9.2<br />

12.1<br />

10.9<br />

14.4<br />

11.3<br />

5.2<br />

4.8<br />

4.9<br />

115<br />

2,549<br />

3,5<strong>04</strong><br />

791<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

81.8<br />

87.4<br />

74.5<br />

64.9<br />

59.5<br />

70.6<br />

42.3<br />

51.7<br />

41.2<br />

54.7<br />

9.2<br />

18.0<br />

5.3<br />

4.4<br />

4,967<br />

1,993<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

81.8<br />

84.8<br />

83.7<br />

72.5<br />

65.0<br />

74.1<br />

62.0<br />

59.5<br />

64.5<br />

29.6<br />

48.2<br />

51.9<br />

41.2<br />

48.9<br />

45.5<br />

10.2<br />

9.5<br />

13.4<br />

7.8<br />

7.3<br />

2.6<br />

1,912<br />

1,492<br />

3,544<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

83.5<br />

84.7<br />

87.9<br />

31.2<br />

64.4<br />

74.4<br />

79.1<br />

92.7<br />

54.6<br />

68.1<br />

49.6<br />

51.4<br />

52.3<br />

42.2<br />

43.9<br />

15.9<br />

36.9<br />

51.8<br />

28.0<br />

5.9<br />

10.1<br />

13.1<br />

7.5<br />

2.4<br />

6.6<br />

4.6<br />

1.1<br />

2.6<br />

2,212<br />

4,309<br />

279<br />

138<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

81.8<br />

48.5<br />

88.7<br />

86.2<br />

74.9<br />

80.2<br />

68.0<br />

71.1<br />

55.5<br />

44.7<br />

63.1<br />

66.0<br />

49.8<br />

27.0<br />

33.7<br />

49.5<br />

35.0<br />

23.2<br />

49.6<br />

48.0<br />

13.3<br />

12.9<br />

10.9<br />

11.5<br />

4.7<br />

4.7<br />

3.6<br />

5.6<br />

667<br />

473<br />

1,241<br />

4,510<br />

Standard of living<br />

index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

76.1<br />

85.6<br />

82.9<br />

79.5<br />

72.2<br />

67.6<br />

50.4<br />

67.8<br />

59.8<br />

36.5<br />

43.8<br />

50.5<br />

30.7<br />

49.9<br />

43.6<br />

18.4<br />

9.8<br />

11.9<br />

6.6<br />

5.0<br />

4.4<br />

983<br />

3,693<br />

2,283<br />

Total<br />

83.4<br />

71.7<br />

62.7<br />

45.0<br />

45.1<br />

11.7<br />

5.0<br />

6,959<br />

Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in other<br />

religion who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

five percent for Muslims and one percent for Sikhs, while it was three percent for Buddhist.<br />

The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent for<br />

SC/ST men as against four percent for OBC men and six percent for other caste men. The<br />

percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was seven percent for men<br />

with low SLI and five percent for men with medium SLI, while it was over four percent for men<br />

with high SLI. The percentage of men who heard about HIV/AIDS reported it can be avoided by<br />

‘sex with only one partner’ (83 percent),’using condoms correctly during each sexual intercourse’<br />

(72 percent),’checking blood prior to transfusion’ (63 percent),’sterilizing needles and syringes<br />

for injection’ (45 percent) and ’avoiding pregnancy when having HIV/AIDS’ (45 percent). All<br />

the specific ways except ‘using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ to avoid<br />

HIV/AIDS reported by men were higher in urban areas than in rural areas. However, percentage<br />

of men who said HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘using condom correctly during each sexual<br />

intercourse’ was higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />

153


8.5.4 Misconception about HIV/AIDS<br />

People generally have misconceptions about the ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS, such as<br />

‘shaking hands with a person having AIDS’, hugging and kissing with them, sharing their clothes<br />

or sharing eating utensils, stepping on urine/stool, through insect bites, for example, being bitten<br />

by mosquitoes, fleas and bedbugs. All these questions were asked to the respondents who had<br />

heard of HIV/AIDS.<br />

Table 8.16 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, percentage of women having misconceptions about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by<br />

selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of women having misconception<br />

about the transmission of HIV/AIDS reported as ‘shaking hands’ (seven percent), ’hugging’<br />

(nine percent),’kissing’ (17 percent),’sharing clothes’ (seven percent),’sharing eating utensils’ (five<br />

percent),’stepping on urine/stool’ (six percent) and ’mosquito, flea or bedbugs biting’ (14 percent).<br />

Table 8.16 MISCONCEPTION ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />

Among currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of women having misconception<br />

about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Percentage having misconception about the transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />

Shaking<br />

hands Hugging Kissing<br />

Sharing<br />

clothes<br />

Sharing<br />

eating<br />

utensils<br />

Stepping on<br />

Urine / stool<br />

Mosquito, flea,<br />

or bedbugs<br />

biting<br />

Number of<br />

women<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

7.4<br />

7.1<br />

10.5<br />

4.9<br />

22.8<br />

5.8<br />

7.9<br />

3.8<br />

6.2<br />

2.4<br />

6.7<br />

5.1<br />

13.5<br />

13.7<br />

3,807<br />

1,739<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

7.8<br />

6.9<br />

6.7<br />

11.4<br />

5.2<br />

6.6<br />

25.0<br />

10.5<br />

9.6<br />

7.4<br />

6.0<br />

5.7<br />

5.0<br />

4.6<br />

5.2<br />

6.1<br />

5.9<br />

6.5<br />

14.9<br />

6.0<br />

15.9<br />

2,787<br />

1,030<br />

1,729<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

7.8<br />

7.6<br />

1.6<br />

0.4<br />

5.0<br />

11.5<br />

2.9<br />

2.3<br />

11.0<br />

21.7<br />

15.2<br />

7.8<br />

6.4<br />

7.0<br />

4.3<br />

1.1<br />

6.5<br />

4.2<br />

6.0<br />

0.9<br />

6.2<br />

6.3<br />

6.0<br />

2.1<br />

11.3<br />

15.0<br />

17.0<br />

5.1<br />

1,892<br />

3,333<br />

200<br />

105<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

8.5<br />

23.4<br />

5.8<br />

4.9<br />

5.2<br />

21.8<br />

6.3<br />

8.0<br />

17.4<br />

28.9<br />

18.6<br />

15.5<br />

7.7<br />

22.6<br />

6.7<br />

3.8<br />

10.4<br />

7.5<br />

4.4<br />

3.9<br />

8.4<br />

8.5<br />

6.7<br />

5.3<br />

11.8<br />

23.7<br />

14.8<br />

11.9<br />

557<br />

541<br />

1,011<br />

3,418<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

17.8<br />

6.1<br />

4.9<br />

22.2<br />

8.7<br />

3.4<br />

36.6<br />

19.1<br />

7.2<br />

15.6<br />

6.6<br />

2.9<br />

7.7<br />

5.8<br />

2.6<br />

13.2<br />

5.5<br />

4.4<br />

21.3<br />

12.3<br />

12.4<br />

752<br />

2,944<br />

1,851<br />

Total<br />

7.3<br />

8.8<br />

17.5<br />

6.6<br />

5.0<br />

6.2<br />

13.6<br />

5,547<br />

Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />

@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

Table 8.17 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard<br />

about HIV/AIDS, percentage of men having misconceptions about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by<br />

selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of men having misconception<br />

about the transmission of HIV/AIDS reported as ‘shaking hands’ (four percent), ’hugging’<br />

154


(seven percent), ’kissing’ (16 percent),’sharing clothes’ (four percent),’sharing eating utensils’ (five<br />

percent), ’stepping on urine/stool’ (seven percent) and ’mosquito, flea or bedbugs biting’ (15<br />

percent). The data shows that percentage of men having misconceptions about the transmission<br />

of HIV/AIDS was higher in rural areas than urban areas.<br />

Table 8.17 MISCONCEPTION ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />

Among husbands currently married women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of men having misconception about<br />

the transmission of HIV/AIDS by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Percentage having misconception about the transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />

Shaking<br />

hands Hugging Kissing<br />

4.2<br />

4.4<br />

8.5<br />

3.4<br />

20.2<br />

6.4<br />

Sharing<br />

clothes<br />

4.7<br />

3.5<br />

Sharing<br />

eating<br />

utensils<br />

6.4<br />

3.0<br />

Stepping on<br />

Urine / stool<br />

8.3<br />

3.7<br />

Mosquito, flea, or<br />

bedbugs biting<br />

15.7<br />

14.2<br />

Number of<br />

men<br />

4,967<br />

1,993<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

5.0<br />

2.8<br />

4.5<br />

12.8<br />

3.9<br />

5.3<br />

31.3<br />

8.2<br />

11.5<br />

6.1<br />

3.3<br />

3.9<br />

7.2<br />

3.9<br />

5.1<br />

9.7<br />

4.6<br />

6.5<br />

20.0<br />

8.5<br />

15.6<br />

1,912<br />

1,492<br />

3,544<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

5.6<br />

3.7<br />

3.9<br />

0.3<br />

4.9<br />

8.2<br />

8.6<br />

3.3<br />

10.2<br />

18.8<br />

24.2<br />

16.9<br />

5.9<br />

3.4<br />

7.5<br />

1.8<br />

6.0<br />

4.3<br />

15.8<br />

8.2<br />

5.9<br />

6.5<br />

19.9<br />

8.5<br />

12.1<br />

15.4<br />

35.0<br />

24.4<br />

2,212<br />

4,309<br />

279<br />

138<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

7.3<br />

4.1<br />

3.8<br />

4.0<br />

7.1<br />

7.8<br />

5.6<br />

7.4<br />

15.7<br />

24.9<br />

17.6<br />

15.2<br />

9.4<br />

6.6<br />

4.8<br />

3.3<br />

10.3<br />

7.4<br />

6.5<br />

4.2<br />

9.9<br />

13.7<br />

8.2<br />

5.6<br />

15.5<br />

23.4<br />

17.8<br />

14.0<br />

667<br />

473<br />

1,241<br />

4,510<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

6.7<br />

3.8<br />

4.0<br />

15.7<br />

7.1<br />

3.3<br />

33.1<br />

17.1<br />

7.5<br />

6.5<br />

4.4<br />

3.3<br />

10.9<br />

5.3<br />

3.2<br />

13.0<br />

6.8<br />

4.6<br />

23.0<br />

14.5<br />

13.3<br />

983<br />

3,693<br />

2,283<br />

Total<br />

4.3<br />

7.0<br />

16.2<br />

Note: Table includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in<br />

other religion who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not<br />

add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

8.5.5 Knowledge of Curability of HIV/AIDS<br />

Table 8.18 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands, who have heard about<br />

HIV/AIDS, percent distribution of respondents by knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS, by<br />

selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of women who heard about HIV/<br />

AIDS and said that it is curable was 19 percent in the state – 22 percent in rural areas and 12<br />

percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of women who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that<br />

it is not curable was 57 percent in the state – 53 percent in rural areas and 67 percent in urban<br />

areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’ about the curability of HIV/AIDS was<br />

24 percent in the state – 25 percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas.<br />

The percentage of women who said HIV/AIDS is curable was nine percent for women<br />

who had studied for 0-9 years as against 10 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and<br />

above and 27 percent for non-literate women. Five percent of Hindu women as against 27<br />

percent of Muslim women and 15 percent of Sikh women said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it<br />

4.3<br />

5.4<br />

6.9<br />

15.3<br />

6,959<br />

155


was over five percent for Buddhist women. Seventeen percent of scheduled caste women as against<br />

25 percent scheduled tribe women and 19 percent of OBC women said that HIV/AIDS is curable,<br />

while it was 18 percent for other caste women. The percentage of women who said HIV/AIDS is<br />

curable was 21 percent for women with medium SLI as against eight percent for women with<br />

high SLI and 36 percent for women with low SLI.<br />

The percentage of men who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that it is curable was 21<br />

percent in the state – 24 percent in rural areas and 13 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of<br />

men who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that it is not curable was 55 percent in the state – 50<br />

percent in rural areas and 69 percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not<br />

know’ about the curability of HIV/AIDS was 24 percent in the state – 26 percent in rural areas<br />

and 18 percent in urban areas.<br />

The percentage of men who said HIV/AIDS is curable was 10 percent for men who had<br />

studied for 0-9 years as against 16 percent for men who had studied for 10 years and above and 37<br />

percent for non-literate men. Over six percent of Hindu men as against 27 percent of Muslim<br />

men and 34 percent of Sikh men said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it was over 12 percent for<br />

Buddhist men. Seventeen percent of scheduled caste men as against 27 percent of scheduled tribe<br />

men and 21 percent of OBC men said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it was 20 percent for<br />

other caste men. The percentage of men who said HIV/AIDS is curable was 23 percent for men<br />

with medium SLI as against 11 percent for men with high SLI and 32 percent for men with low SLI.<br />

Table 8.18 KNOWLEDGE OF CURABILITY ABOUT HIV/AIDS<br />

Among currently married women and their husbands, who have heard about HIV/AIDS, Percent distribution of respondents by<br />

knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS, according to some selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Background characteristic<br />

Residence<br />

<strong>Rural</strong><br />

Urban<br />

Percent distribution of women<br />

Percent distribution of men<br />

Number of<br />

Yes No Do not know women Yes No Do not know<br />

21.6<br />

12.0<br />

52.9<br />

67.5<br />

25.5<br />

20.5<br />

3,807<br />

1,739<br />

23.8<br />

12.6<br />

49.8<br />

69.3<br />

26.0<br />

18.0<br />

Number of<br />

men<br />

4,967<br />

1,993<br />

Education<br />

Non-literate<br />

0-9@ years<br />

10 years and above<br />

27.2<br />

8.9<br />

10.4<br />

47.9<br />

59.9<br />

71.6<br />

24.9<br />

31.2<br />

18.0<br />

2,787<br />

1,030<br />

1,729<br />

37.0<br />

10.2<br />

16.2<br />

31.8<br />

56.5<br />

67.6<br />

31.2<br />

32.6<br />

16.1<br />

1,912<br />

1,492<br />

3,544<br />

Religion<br />

Hindu<br />

Muslim<br />

Sikh<br />

Buddhist<br />

4.7<br />

27.1<br />

15.2<br />

5.5<br />

71.9<br />

47.2<br />

73.8<br />

93.3<br />

23.4<br />

25.7<br />

11.0<br />

1.1<br />

1,892<br />

3,333<br />

200<br />

105<br />

6.5<br />

27.3<br />

34.3<br />

12.5<br />

74.1<br />

44.8<br />

57.5<br />

83.6<br />

19.0<br />

27.8<br />

8.3<br />

3.9<br />

2,212<br />

4,309<br />

279<br />

138<br />

Caste/tribe #<br />

Scheduled caste<br />

Scheduled tribe<br />

Other backward class<br />

Other<br />

17.1<br />

25.4<br />

18.7<br />

17.8<br />

63.2<br />

64.1<br />

46.2<br />

59.0<br />

19.8<br />

10.4<br />

35.1<br />

23.2<br />

557<br />

541<br />

1,011<br />

3,418<br />

17.3<br />

27.2<br />

21.4<br />

20.2<br />

66.7<br />

63.6<br />

44.9<br />

55.6<br />

15.6<br />

8.9<br />

33.5<br />

23.8<br />

667<br />

473<br />

1,241<br />

4,510<br />

Standard of living index<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

36.0<br />

20.6<br />

8.2<br />

51.6<br />

50.0<br />

71.7<br />

12.4<br />

29.3<br />

20.0<br />

752<br />

2,944<br />

1,851<br />

32.5<br />

23.1<br />

11.4<br />

46.1<br />

48.2<br />

71.1<br />

20.6<br />

28.5<br />

17.4<br />

983<br />

3,693<br />

2,283<br />

Total<br />

18.6 57.5<br />

23.9 5,547 20.6 55.4 23.7 6,959<br />

Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who are not shown separately. Total includes 16 women and 21<br />

men in other religion who were not shown separately<br />

@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />

156


8.6 Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by <strong>District</strong><br />

Table 8.19 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands aware of RTI/STI<br />

and HIV/AIDS by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of currently married women<br />

aware of RTI/STI was the highest (90 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 46 percent in<br />

Leh district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. The percentage of currently married<br />

women aware of RTI/STI was higher than that of the state (15 percent) in Baramula, Kargil and<br />

Leh districts, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than that of the state. The percentage of<br />

currently married women aware of HIV/AIDS was the highest (92 percent) in Baramula district,<br />

followed by 91 percent in Leh district and the lowest (11 percent) in Rajouri district. The percentage<br />

of currently married women aware of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (54 percent) in<br />

Anantnag, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil and Leh districts, while in the remaining nine districts it<br />

was lower than that of the state.<br />

Further, percentage of men aware of RTI/STI was the highest (91 percent) in Baramula<br />

district, followed by 52 percent in Leh district and the lowest (over one percent) in Kathua<br />

district. The percentage of men aware of RTI/STI was higher than that of the state (27 percent) in<br />

Badgam, Baramula, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining<br />

seven districts it was lower than that of the state. Similarly, percentage of men aware of<br />

HIV/AIDS was the highest (99 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 97 percent<br />

in Baramula district and the lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district. The percentage of men<br />

aware of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (68 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam,<br />

Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Poonch districts, while in the remaining<br />

five districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />

Table 8.19 AWARENESS OF RTI/STI AND HIV/AIDS BY DISTRICT<br />

Percentage of currently married women and their husbands aware of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Percentage of women<br />

Percentage of men<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Aware of RTI/STI Aware of HIV/AIDS Aware of RTI/STI Aware of HIV/AIDS<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

(2.8)<br />

7.1<br />

90.0<br />

(0.0)<br />

11.1<br />

87.4<br />

32.9<br />

92.1<br />

46.0<br />

72.4<br />

14.1<br />

33.7<br />

91.4<br />

4.4<br />

10.8<br />

98.7<br />

69.1<br />

97.4<br />

0.4<br />

82.5<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

20.6<br />

(0.6)<br />

11.9<br />

46.5<br />

12.1<br />

84.2<br />

39.9<br />

45.1<br />

91.4<br />

45.6<br />

37.5<br />

1.4<br />

35.4<br />

52.1<br />

34.7<br />

98.7<br />

62.0<br />

72.3<br />

93.1<br />

72.6<br />

Poonch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

(2.5)<br />

(1.4)<br />

8.5<br />

2.9<br />

52.0<br />

10.8<br />

17.0<br />

18.4<br />

20.5<br />

7.1<br />

38.0<br />

13.0<br />

72.9<br />

17.0<br />

51.5<br />

39.2<br />

Jammu & Kashmir<br />

15.3<br />

53.8<br />

27.2<br />

68.0<br />

( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />

157


Appendix A<br />

Sampling Error Estimation<br />

The accuracy of programme indicators such as contraceptive prevalence rate, unmet need and<br />

institutional delivery, antenatal coverage etc. estimated from DLHS-RCH can be assessed in<br />

terms of stability of the estimated indicators as measured by the standard errors. Standard errors<br />

reflect only the appropriateness and suitability of sampling design adopted for RCH survey.<br />

However, the accuracy of estimated programme indicator are also affected to a great extent by<br />

non-sampling errors arising from lack of proper operationalisation and non-response cases, and<br />

is inherent in large scale surveys. The estimation producers of <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> Reproductive &<br />

Child <strong>Health</strong> survey takes into consideration design appropriateness and non-response rates.<br />

DLHS-RCH estimator of a programme indicator is design as<br />

r =<br />

∑∑∑w<br />

h j i<br />

∑∑∑w<br />

h j i<br />

hji<br />

hji<br />

y<br />

x<br />

hji<br />

hji<br />

=<br />

y<br />

x<br />

………………………………………. (1 )<br />

where the cell (h, j, i) stands for i th observational unit in j th primary sampling unit (PSU) in h th<br />

stratum, basically rural-urban areas of a district are taken as strata. W hij is the sampling weight of<br />

(h, j, i) th cell inflated by response rates. The variables y and x denote the main and the auxiliary<br />

characteristics required for computation of proportion or ratios.<br />

The equation for estimation of variance of programme indicator ( r ) is obtained after Taylor<br />

series linearisation as<br />

1<br />

var ( r ) =<br />

2<br />

x [ var ( y ) + r2 var ( x ) - 2 r cov (y, x )] ……………… …………….(2 )<br />

nh<br />

var ( y ) = ∑<br />

n −<br />

h<br />

h<br />

[ ∑∑( y )<br />

1 hji hij<br />

j<br />

i<br />

w 2<br />

–<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

∑∑<br />

⎝<br />

] .………….( 3 )<br />

2<br />

w y ⎞<br />

⎟<br />

hji hji<br />

j i ⎠<br />

nh<br />

nh<br />

cov ( y , x ) = ∑ [ n − 1<br />

h<br />

h<br />

∑∑<br />

j<br />

i<br />

w<br />

2<br />

hji<br />

y<br />

hji<br />

x<br />

hji<br />

−<br />

(<br />

∑∑<br />

w<br />

y<br />

)(<br />

∑∑<br />

hji hji<br />

j i j i<br />

n h<br />

w<br />

hji<br />

x<br />

hji<br />

)<br />

] ……….( 4 )<br />

and n h is the number of sampled PSUs representing rural or urban areas of a district/state.


List of Selected Programme Variables for Sampling Errors, RCH <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Variable Estimate Base Population<br />

CPR (Any Method) Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />

Unmet Need Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />

Any ANC Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />

ANC3+ Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />

Institutional Delivery Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />

Safe Delivery Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />

BCG Proportion Children age 12-23 months<br />

Measles Proportion Children age 12-23 months<br />

BO3+ Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />

with births in past three years<br />

160


Sampling errors, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

Number of cases<br />

Variables<br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE) Unweighted Weighted<br />

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />

Design<br />

Effect<br />

Relative<br />

Error (%)<br />

95% Conf. Interval<br />

R-1.96 R+1.96<br />

SE SE<br />

Total 0.548 0.007 10,308 10,308 1.783 1.2 0.535 0.560<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.509 0.007 7,851 7,851 1.537 1.4 0.495 0.523<br />

Urban 0.671 0.015 2,457 2,457 2.469 2.2 0.642 0.700<br />

Unmet Need (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />

Total 0.248 0.005 10,308 10,308 1.633 2.2 0.237 0.259<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.272 0.006 7,851 7,851 1.498 2.3 0.260 0.284<br />

Urban 0.170 0.011 2,457 2,457 2.068 6.4 0.149 0.191<br />

Received Any Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Total 0.876 0.008 2,276 2,596 1.587 0.9 0.860 0.892<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.856 0.009 1,708 1,965 1.386 1.1 0.838 0.874<br />

Urban 0.939 0.016 568 631 2.991 1.8 0.907 0.971<br />

Received 3+ Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Total 0.805 0.010 2,276 2,596 1.708 1.3 0.785 0.825<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.782 0.011 1,708 1,966 1.470 1.5 0.759 0.8<strong>04</strong><br />

Urban 0.879 0.022 568 630 2.968 2.5 0.835 0.922<br />

Institutional Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Total 0.705 0.012 2,276 2,596 1.763 1.7 0.682 0.728<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.681 0.013 1,708 1,965 1.510 1.9 0.656 0.707<br />

Urban 0.778 0.028 568 631 2.830 3.6 0.724 0.833<br />

Safe Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Total 0.731 0.012 2,276 2,596 1.771 1.6 0.709 0.754<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.7<strong>04</strong> 0.013 1,708 1,965 1.509 1.8 0.679 0.729<br />

Urban 0.818 0.027 568 631 3.<strong>04</strong>4 3.3 0.765 0.870<br />

Received BCG Vaccination (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />

Total 0.915 0.015 537 644 1.463 1.6 0.886 0.943<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.9<strong>04</strong> 0.017 384 461 1.259 1.9 0.871 0.937<br />

Urban 0.942 0.029 153 183 2.270 3.0 0.885 0.998<br />

Received Measles (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />

Total 0.779 0.023 537 644 1.664 3.0 0.733 0.824<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.794 0.023 384 461 1.242 2.9 0.749 0.840<br />

Urban 0.740 0.056 153 183 2.515 7.6 0.628 0.851<br />

Birth order 3+ (birth in last three years)<br />

Total 0.321 0.013 1,932 2,285 1.776 4.1 0.295 0.347<br />

<strong>Rural</strong> 0.353 0.015 1,436 1,686 1.642 4.2 0.324 0.382<br />

Urban 0.231 0.024 496 599 1.917 10.3 0.184 0.277<br />

161


Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.764<br />

0.403<br />

0.279<br />

0.182<br />

0.739<br />

0.020<br />

0.030<br />

0.020<br />

0.017<br />

0.021<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

511<br />

308<br />

625<br />

551<br />

514<br />

517<br />

308<br />

625<br />

551<br />

514<br />

2.6<br />

7.4<br />

7.2<br />

9.3<br />

2.8<br />

0.725<br />

0.345<br />

0.239<br />

0.149<br />

0.698<br />

0.802<br />

0.461<br />

0.318<br />

0.215<br />

0.779<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.866<br />

0.429<br />

0.656<br />

0.916<br />

0.671<br />

0.019<br />

0.024<br />

0.021<br />

0.016<br />

0.021<br />

475<br />

534<br />

597<br />

349<br />

593<br />

475<br />

534<br />

597<br />

349<br />

589<br />

2.2<br />

5.6<br />

3.2<br />

1.7<br />

3.1<br />

0.829<br />

0.382<br />

0.615<br />

0.886<br />

0.629<br />

0.902<br />

0.477<br />

0.696<br />

0.947<br />

0.712<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.585<br />

0.227<br />

0.455<br />

0.496<br />

0.024<br />

0.018<br />

0.025<br />

0.022<br />

599<br />

824<br />

614<br />

757<br />

599<br />

823<br />

614<br />

758<br />

4.1<br />

7.9<br />

5.5<br />

4.4<br />

0.538<br />

0.192<br />

0.407<br />

0.453<br />

0.632<br />

0.263<br />

0.503<br />

0.539<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Unmet Need (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.082<br />

0.233<br />

0.593<br />

0.659<br />

0.081<br />

0.011<br />

0.022<br />

0.018<br />

0.017<br />

0.010<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

698<br />

432<br />

881<br />

779<br />

854<br />

702<br />

433<br />

881<br />

779<br />

855<br />

13.4<br />

9.4<br />

3.0<br />

2.6<br />

12.3<br />

0.061<br />

0.190<br />

0.558<br />

0.625<br />

0.062<br />

0.102<br />

0.276<br />

0.629<br />

0.693<br />

0.101<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.079<br />

0.299<br />

0.122<br />

0.031<br />

0.124<br />

0.015<br />

0.019<br />

0.012<br />

0.008<br />

0.013<br />

475<br />

763<br />

831<br />

484<br />

826<br />

475<br />

763<br />

831<br />

484<br />

815<br />

19.0<br />

6.4<br />

9.8<br />

25.8<br />

10.5<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />

0.262<br />

0.098<br />

0.016<br />

0.099<br />

0.108<br />

0.336<br />

0.146<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />

0.149<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.312<br />

0.436<br />

0.201<br />

0.2<strong>04</strong><br />

0.019<br />

0.023<br />

0.020<br />

0.015<br />

878<br />

824<br />

614<br />

969<br />

879<br />

824<br />

614<br />

970<br />

6.1<br />

5.3<br />

10.0<br />

7.4<br />

0.274<br />

0.391<br />

0.161<br />

0.174<br />

0.349<br />

0.480<br />

0.241<br />

0.233<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Received Any Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.894<br />

0.889<br />

0.979<br />

0.565<br />

0.888<br />

0.021<br />

0.026<br />

0.007<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />

0.020<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

237<br />

136<br />

419<br />

110<br />

266<br />

244<br />

137<br />

423<br />

113<br />

276<br />

2.3<br />

2.9<br />

0.7<br />

8.5<br />

2.3<br />

0.854<br />

0.837<br />

0.964<br />

0.472<br />

0.849<br />

0.935<br />

0.941<br />

0.993<br />

0.659<br />

0.927<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.969<br />

0.737<br />

0.928<br />

0.920<br />

0.941<br />

0.030<br />

0.031<br />

0.022<br />

0.036<br />

0.019<br />

90<br />

260<br />

168<br />

65<br />

168<br />

88<br />

276<br />

176<br />

65<br />

175<br />

3.1<br />

4.2<br />

2.4<br />

3.9<br />

2.0<br />

0.910<br />

0.676<br />

0.884<br />

0.849<br />

0.9<strong>04</strong><br />

1.028<br />

0.797<br />

0.972<br />

0.991<br />

0.977<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.548<br />

0.642<br />

0.870<br />

0.896<br />

0.055<br />

0.056<br />

0.055<br />

0.031<br />

112<br />

98<br />

47<br />

100<br />

93<br />

87<br />

49<br />

96<br />

10.0<br />

8.7<br />

6.3<br />

3.5<br />

0.440<br />

0.532<br />

0.761<br />

0.835<br />

0.656<br />

0.753<br />

0.979<br />

0.956<br />

162


Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Received 3+ Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.842<br />

0.885<br />

0.976<br />

0.527<br />

0.829<br />

0.025<br />

0.027<br />

0.008<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />

0.025<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

237<br />

136<br />

419<br />

110<br />

266<br />

244<br />

137<br />

423<br />

112<br />

276<br />

3.0<br />

3.1<br />

0.8<br />

9.1<br />

3.0<br />

0.793<br />

0.832<br />

0.961<br />

0.433<br />

0.780<br />

0.891<br />

0.937<br />

0.992<br />

0.621<br />

0.877<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.958<br />

0.394<br />

0.912<br />

0.896<br />

0.918<br />

0.032<br />

0.034<br />

0.024<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />

0.022<br />

90<br />

260<br />

168<br />

65<br />

168<br />

88<br />

276<br />

176<br />

66<br />

175<br />

3.3<br />

8.6<br />

2.6<br />

4.5<br />

2.4<br />

0.896<br />

0.328<br />

0.864<br />

0.818<br />

0.874<br />

1.020<br />

0.460<br />

0.959<br />

0.973<br />

0.962<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.337<br />

0.538<br />

0.668<br />

0.817<br />

0.051<br />

0.060<br />

0.086<br />

0.039<br />

112<br />

98<br />

47<br />

100<br />

93<br />

87<br />

49<br />

96<br />

15.1<br />

11.2<br />

12.9<br />

4.8<br />

0.236<br />

0.421<br />

0.499<br />

0.740<br />

0.437<br />

0.655<br />

0.838<br />

0.894<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Institutional Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.813<br />

0.929<br />

0.910<br />

0.340<br />

0.727<br />

0.026<br />

0.022<br />

0.019<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>6<br />

0.030<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

237<br />

136<br />

419<br />

110<br />

266<br />

243<br />

138<br />

423<br />

112<br />

276<br />

3.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.1<br />

13.5<br />

4.1<br />

0.762<br />

0.887<br />

0.874<br />

0.249<br />

0.669<br />

0.863<br />

0.972<br />

0.946<br />

0.430<br />

0.786<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.946<br />

0.268<br />

0.630<br />

0.896<br />

0.645<br />

0.023<br />

0.030<br />

0.039<br />

0.039<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />

90<br />

260<br />

168<br />

65<br />

168<br />

88<br />

275<br />

176<br />

66<br />

176<br />

2.4<br />

11.2<br />

6.2<br />

4.4<br />

6.2<br />

0.901<br />

0.208<br />

0.553<br />

0.818<br />

0.567<br />

0.991<br />

0.327<br />

0.707<br />

0.973<br />

0.723<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.232<br />

0.302<br />

0.725<br />

0.501<br />

0.051<br />

0.058<br />

0.077<br />

0.053<br />

112<br />

98<br />

47<br />

100<br />

94<br />

86<br />

48<br />

95<br />

22.0<br />

19.2<br />

10.6<br />

10.6<br />

0.132<br />

0.188<br />

0.575<br />

0.397<br />

0.332<br />

0.416<br />

0.876<br />

0.606<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Safe Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.822<br />

0.929<br />

0.910<br />

0.523<br />

0.758<br />

0.026<br />

0.022<br />

0.019<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />

0.029<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

237<br />

136<br />

419<br />

110<br />

266<br />

244<br />

138<br />

423<br />

112<br />

276<br />

3.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.1<br />

9.2<br />

3.8<br />

0.772<br />

0.887<br />

0.874<br />

0.428<br />

0.702<br />

0.872<br />

0.972<br />

0.946<br />

0.617<br />

0.814<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.946<br />

0.299<br />

0.649<br />

0.936<br />

0.664<br />

0.023<br />

0.032<br />

0.039<br />

0.028<br />

0.039<br />

90<br />

260<br />

168<br />

65<br />

168<br />

88<br />

275<br />

175<br />

66<br />

176<br />

2.4<br />

10.7<br />

6.0<br />

3.0<br />

5.9<br />

0.901<br />

0.237<br />

0.572<br />

0.880<br />

0.587<br />

0.991<br />

0.361<br />

0.725<br />

0.991<br />

0.740<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.524<br />

0.350<br />

0.752<br />

0.595<br />

0.054<br />

0.059<br />

0.075<br />

0.052<br />

112<br />

98<br />

47<br />

100<br />

93<br />

86<br />

49<br />

96<br />

10.3<br />

16.9<br />

10.0<br />

8.7<br />

0.417<br />

0.235<br />

0.606<br />

0.494<br />

0.630<br />

0.466<br />

0.899<br />

0.697<br />

163


Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Received BCG Vaccination (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

1.000<br />

0.897<br />

0.972<br />

0.917<br />

0.879<br />

0.000<br />

0.068<br />

0.020<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>6<br />

0.035<br />

34<br />

25<br />

73<br />

27<br />

86<br />

35<br />

26<br />

78<br />

27<br />

87<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

0.0<br />

7.6<br />

2.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

1.000<br />

0.763<br />

0.933<br />

0.827<br />

0.810<br />

1.000<br />

1.031<br />

1.011<br />

1.008<br />

0.947<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

-<br />

0.938<br />

0.943<br />

-<br />

0.935<br />

-<br />

0.038<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />

-<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />

-<br />

64<br />

35<br />

-<br />

35<br />

-<br />

67<br />

37<br />

-<br />

33<br />

-<br />

4.1<br />

4.3<br />

-<br />

5.3<br />

-<br />

0.863<br />

0.864<br />

-<br />

0.839<br />

-<br />

1.014<br />

1.023<br />

-<br />

1.032<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.489<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.975<br />

- Standard Error not shown due to fewer cases<br />

0.105<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.025<br />

27<br />

-<br />

-<br />

35<br />

21<br />

-<br />

-<br />

35<br />

21.4<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2.6<br />

0.283<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.926<br />

0.694<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1.024<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

Received Measles (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />

Anantanag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.892<br />

0.742<br />

0.950<br />

0.852<br />

0.745<br />

0.052<br />

0.086<br />

0.025<br />

0.058<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

34<br />

25<br />

73<br />

27<br />

86<br />

35<br />

26<br />

78<br />

27<br />

87<br />

5.8<br />

11.6<br />

2.7<br />

6.7<br />

6.3<br />

0.790<br />

0.572<br />

0.900<br />

0.739<br />

0.652<br />

0.994<br />

0.911<br />

1.000<br />

0.965<br />

0.837<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

-<br />

0.845<br />

0.784<br />

-<br />

0.761<br />

-<br />

0.054<br />

0.075<br />

-<br />

0.083<br />

-<br />

64<br />

35<br />

-<br />

35<br />

-<br />

67<br />

37<br />

-<br />

33<br />

-<br />

6.4<br />

9.6<br />

-<br />

10.9<br />

-<br />

0.739<br />

0.636<br />

-<br />

0.598<br />

-<br />

0.951<br />

0.931<br />

-<br />

0.924<br />

Punch<br />

Rajauri<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.293<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.554<br />

- Standard Error not shown due to fewer cases<br />

0.089<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.079<br />

27<br />

-<br />

-<br />

35<br />

21<br />

-<br />

-<br />

35<br />

30.3<br />

-<br />

-<br />

14.3<br />

0.118<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.399<br />

0.467<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.710<br />

Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

(R)<br />

Birth order 3+ (birth in last three years)<br />

Anantnag<br />

Badgam<br />

Baramula<br />

Doda<br />

Jammu<br />

0.454<br />

0.261<br />

0.561<br />

0.226<br />

0.185<br />

Sampling<br />

error (SE)<br />

0.038<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>2<br />

0.030<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />

0.026<br />

Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />

Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />

188<br />

114<br />

314<br />

79<br />

263<br />

193<br />

113<br />

314<br />

80<br />

271<br />

8.4<br />

16.1<br />

5.3<br />

21.2<br />

14.1<br />

0.380<br />

0.179<br />

0.502<br />

0.131<br />

0.134<br />

0.527<br />

0.343<br />

0.620<br />

0.321<br />

0.236<br />

Kargil<br />

Kathua<br />

Kupwara<br />

Leh (Ladakh)<br />

Pulwama<br />

0.406<br />

0.340<br />

0.285<br />

0.428<br />

0.291<br />

0.074<br />

0.032<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>1<br />

0.082<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>3<br />

62<br />

271<br />

137<br />

40<br />

136<br />

64<br />

288<br />

145<br />

43<br />

141<br />

18.2<br />

9.4<br />

14.4<br />

19.2<br />

14.8<br />

0.261<br />

0.278<br />

0.2<strong>04</strong><br />

0.268<br />

0.206<br />

0.550<br />

0.403<br />

0.365<br />

0.589<br />

0.375<br />

Punch<br />

Rajori<br />

Srinagar<br />

Udhampur<br />

0.068<br />

0.188<br />

0.276<br />

0.330<br />

0.024<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />

0.072<br />

0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />

95<br />

78<br />

58<br />

97<br />

77<br />

71<br />

64<br />

93<br />

35.3<br />

25.0<br />

26.1<br />

14.8<br />

0.022<br />

0.096<br />

0.135<br />

0.233<br />

0.115<br />

0.280<br />

0.417<br />

0.427<br />

164


APPENDIX B<br />

DLHS-RCH STAFF, JAMMU & KASHMIR<br />

Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi<br />

Project Director<br />

Dr. O.P.Vig<br />

Mr. M.A. Khan<br />

Mr. Mr. Des Raj<br />

Mr. Joginder Paul<br />

Mr. Nashir Malik<br />

Mr. Muneer Malik<br />

Mr. Mohd. Qasim<br />

Mr. Ravi Kumar<br />

Mr. Irshad Rashid<br />

Mr. Iftikar Rashid<br />

Mr. Mohd. Ramzan<br />

Mr. Mohd. Bilkan Wani<br />

Mr. Muhhamad Razab<br />

Mr. Sayeed Zahoor<br />

Mr. Yesh Paul<br />

Mr. Mustaq Ahmad<br />

Mr. Gulshan Akhtar<br />

Mr. Dilshad Akhtar<br />

Miss Farhat Khan<br />

Mr. Sanjay Kumar<br />

Mr. Jagdish Chander<br />

Mr. Mohd. Qasim<br />

Mr. A. R. Sofi<br />

Mr. Mustaq Ahmad<br />

Miss. Shama Devi<br />

Mr. Javeed Ahmad War<br />

Mr. A. M. Rather<br />

Project Coordinators<br />

Field Mangers<br />

Field Officers<br />

Team Supervisors<br />

Field Editors<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Investigators<br />

Interviewers<br />

<strong>Household</strong> listing Supervisors<br />

<strong>Household</strong> Listers and Mappers<br />

Office Editors<br />

Data Entry Operators<br />

Mr. G.R. Malik<br />

Mr. Tilak Raj<br />

Mr. Nasir Malik<br />

Mr. Omar Rasool<br />

Mr. Aijaz Ahmad<br />

Mr. Omar Malik<br />

Mr. Yaseen<br />

Mr. Khalid Malik<br />

Mr. Mehraj Khalid<br />

Mr. Khalid Abbas<br />

Mr. Ab Qayoom Mir<br />

Miss. Shakeela Bano<br />

Miss. Shanti Devi<br />

Miss. Kanta<br />

Miss. Bimla Devi<br />

Miss Rajani Devi<br />

Miss. Indu Sharma<br />

Miss Raj Rani<br />

Mr. M. R. Malik<br />

Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad<br />

Mr. Mohd. Hussain<br />

Mr. Ajjaz Ahmad<br />

Mr. A.R. Teli<br />

Miss. Fahmeeda Akhtar<br />

Mr. Mohd. Yaseen<br />

Mr. Mehraj Khalid


International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai<br />

Project Coordinators<br />

Senior Research Officers<br />

Mr. M. Nagavara Prasad<br />

Mr. Akash N. Wankhede<br />

Mr. Uttam J Sonkamble<br />

Mr. Ashok Kumar<br />

Ms. Jigna Thacker<br />

Ms. Baishali Goswami<br />

Ms. Sancheeta Ghosh<br />

Ms. Kirti Mishra<br />

Ms. Sucharita Pujari<br />

Ms. Preeti Chauhan<br />

Mrs. Santhi N.S.<br />

Ms. Sanjeeta Gupta<br />

Ms. Reshmi R.S.<br />

Ms. Rinki Saha<br />

Mr. Arnendu Kumar Jha<br />

Mr. Atanu Ghosh<br />

Mr. Manas Pradhan<br />

Research Officers<br />

Dr. F. Ram<br />

Dr. B. Paswan<br />

Dr. L. Ladu Singh<br />

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan<br />

Mr. K. C. Lakhara<br />

Mr. Nizamuddin Khan<br />

Mr. Suhas Narkhede<br />

Mr. Pramod Kumar Gupta<br />

Mr. Bipul Hazarika<br />

Dr. Manoj Alagarajan<br />

Dr. Kalyan Saha<br />

Dr. N Anbazhaham<br />

Dr. Saithya Susaman<br />

Mr. Manoj Kumar<br />

Mr. Dibya L Mohanta<br />

Mr. Mohan Tiwari<br />

Mr. Battala Madhusudana<br />

Mr. Bardanwala S.I.<br />

Mr. Jiten Kumar Singh<br />

Mr. Manoranjan Barik<br />

Mr. Laxmi Prasad Sonwani<br />

Mr. Nimakwala M. I.<br />

Accounts and Administrative staff<br />

Mr. Sunil Adavede (Sr. Accountant)<br />

Mr. Jeba Kumar (Data Entry Operator)<br />

Ms. Pratima P. Zore (Data Entry Operator)<br />

Ms. Preeti S. Kharat (Data Entry Operator)<br />

Ms. Sayali Shivalkar (Data Entry Operator)<br />

Mrs. Seema V. Zagade (Office Assistant)<br />

Mrs. Deepa J. Nair (Office Assistant)<br />

Mr. Chandra D. Singh (Office Boy)<br />

Mr. Ravindra P. Gawade (Office Boy)<br />

Mr. Sanjay P. Kadam (Office Boy)<br />

166


LIST OF CONTRIBUTERS<br />

Dr. O.P. Vig , Project Director, DLHS-RCH Jammu & Kashmir and General Secretary, Society<br />

for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />

Mr. Ummed Singh, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />

Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

Mr. B.K. Yadav, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />

Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />

Mr. Ravikesh, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />

Dr. F. Ram, Professor & Head, Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for<br />

Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />

Dr. B. Paswan, Reader, Department of Population Policy and Programme, International Institute<br />

for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />

Dr. L. Ladu Singh, Professor & Head, Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics,<br />

International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />

Mr. Akash Wankhede, Research Officer, DLHS-RCH, International Institute for Population<br />

Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />

Mr. Ananta Basudev Sahu, Research Officer, DLHS-RCH, International Institute for Population<br />

Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />

167


Appendix – C<br />

Insert bilingual questionnaire<br />

<strong>Household</strong>s, Women, Husbands and Village


NOTES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!