District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...
District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...
District Level Household Survey 2002-04 - National Rural Health ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DLHS -2<br />
DLHS-2<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong><br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
International Institute for<br />
Population Sciences,<br />
(Deemed University)<br />
Mumbai-400088<br />
Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> & Family<br />
Welfare, Government of India,<br />
New Delhi-110011<br />
Society for Applied Research<br />
in Humanities,<br />
New Delhi-110067
Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS - 2)<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
International Institute for<br />
Population Sciences,<br />
(Deemed University)<br />
Mumbai – 400 088<br />
Government of India,<br />
Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> &<br />
Family Welfare,<br />
New Delhi- 110 011<br />
Society for Applied Research<br />
in Humanities<br />
New Delhi – 110 067
CONTRIBUTORS<br />
Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi<br />
O. P. Vig<br />
Ummed Singh<br />
Ghanshyam Upadhyay<br />
B. K. Yadav<br />
Ajay Tripathi<br />
Ravikesh<br />
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai<br />
F. Ram<br />
B. Paswan<br />
L. Ladu Singh<br />
Akash Wankhede<br />
Ananta Basudev Sahu
CONTENTS<br />
Page<br />
Tables …………………………………………………………………………….……… iv<br />
Figures …………………………………………………………………………..…..…… vii<br />
Maps… …………………………………………………………………..………………. vii<br />
Preface and acknowledgement …………………………………………………………… ix<br />
Key Indicators …………………………………………………………………….……… xi<br />
Salient Findings …………………………………………………………………..……… xiii<br />
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1 Background and Objectives of the <strong>Survey</strong> ………...……….………………………. 1<br />
1.2 <strong>Survey</strong> Design..………………………….………..…………….…………………. 1<br />
1.3 House Listing and Sample Selection …………….………….……….……………. 2<br />
1.4 Questionnaire ….……………………………….….………..…………….……….. 3<br />
1.5 Fieldwork and Sample Coverage ……………..…………..……………………….. 4<br />
1.6 Data processing ………………………………………..………………………….. 4<br />
1.7 Sample Weights ………………………………..………………………………….. 5<br />
1.8 Sample Implementation ………………………..………………………………….. 6<br />
1.9 Basic Demographic Profile of the State…….………..………..…………………… 8<br />
CHAPTER II BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLD<br />
2.1 Age –Sex Structure.………………………………………………………………… 11<br />
2.2 <strong>Household</strong> Characteristic ………………………………………………………….. 12<br />
2.3 Educational <strong>Level</strong> .………………………………………………………………… 13<br />
2.4 Marital Status of the <strong>Household</strong> Population ………………………………………. 16<br />
2.5 Marriages ……….…………………………………………………………………. 17<br />
2.6 Morbidity Rates …..……………………………………………………………….. 18<br />
2.7 Morbidity Rates by <strong>District</strong>……………… ………………………………………… 20<br />
2.8 Housing Characteristics …………………………………………………………… 20<br />
2.9 Housing Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>……………...………………………………… 23<br />
2.10 Iodization of Salt …………………………………………………………………… 24<br />
2.11 Iodization of Salt by <strong>District</strong>……………….……………………………………… 25<br />
2.12 Availability of Facilities and Services in <strong>Rural</strong> Population ………………………… 26<br />
2.13 Availability of Education Facility and <strong>Health</strong> Services by <strong>District</strong>………………… 28<br />
CHAPTER III CHARACTRERISTICS OF WOMEN, HUSBANDS AND<br />
FERTILITY<br />
3.1 Background Characteristics of Women …………………………………………… 33<br />
3.2 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Women ……………………………………………………… 34<br />
3.3 Background Characteristics of Husbands’ of Eligible Women …………………… 36<br />
3.4 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Husbands’ of Eligible Women ……………………………… 37<br />
3.5 Children Ever Born and Surviving ………………………………………………… 38<br />
3.6 Completed Fertility by <strong>District</strong>……………. ……………………………………… 38<br />
3.7 Birth Order ………………………………………………………………………… 40<br />
3.8 Birth Order by <strong>District</strong> …………………………………………………………….. 40<br />
3.9 Fertility Preference ………………………………………………………………… 41<br />
3.10 Pregnancy Outcomes ……………………………………………………………… 43
Page<br />
CHAPTER IV MATERNAL HEALTH CARE<br />
4.1<br />
4.2<br />
4.3<br />
4.4<br />
4.5<br />
4.6<br />
4.7<br />
4.8<br />
4.8.1<br />
4.8.2<br />
4.8.3<br />
4.9<br />
4.10<br />
4.11<br />
4.12<br />
Antenatal Check-Ups……………………………………………………………… 45<br />
Antenatal Check-Ups at <strong>Health</strong> Facility…………………………………………… 47<br />
Antenatal Check-Ups by <strong>District</strong>…………………………………………………… 48<br />
Components of Antenatal Check-Ups……………………………………………… 50<br />
Antenatal Care Services…………………………………………………………… 51<br />
Antenatal Care Indicator by <strong>District</strong>.……………………………………………… 56<br />
Pregnancy Complication and Treatment…………………………………………… 57<br />
Delivery Care…………………………………………………………………….… 60<br />
Place of Delivery…………………………………………………………………… 60<br />
Assistance during Home Delivery ………………………………………………… 63<br />
Delivery Assisted by Skilled Person…………………..…………………………… 63<br />
Reasons for Not Going to <strong>Health</strong> Institutions for Delivery………………………… 65<br />
Delivery Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>.………………………………………………. 66<br />
Complication during Delivery….……….…………………………………………. 67<br />
Post Delivery Complication and Treatment ………………………………………. 67<br />
4.13 Obstetric Morbidity by <strong>District</strong>………..……………………………………… 71<br />
CHAPTER V CHILD CARE AND IMMUNIZATION<br />
5.1<br />
5.1.1<br />
5.2<br />
5.3<br />
Breastfeeding……………………………….……………..……………………… 75<br />
Breastfeeding by <strong>District</strong>s………………………………………………………… 78<br />
Immunization of Children………………………………………………………… 78<br />
Source of Immunization…………………………………………………………… 85<br />
5.4 Vitamin A and IFA Supplements…….. ………………………………………… 86<br />
5.5<br />
5.6<br />
5.6.1<br />
5.6.2<br />
5.6.3<br />
5.6.4<br />
Immunization Coverage by <strong>District</strong>.……………………………………………… 88<br />
Child Morbidity and Treatment…………………………………………………… 88<br />
Awareness of Diarrhoea…………………….……………………………………… 88<br />
Treatment of Diarrhoea…………………………………………………………… 90<br />
Awareness of Pneumonia …………………….…………………………………… 92<br />
Treatment of Pneumonia…………………………………………………………… 92<br />
5.6.5 Awareness of Diarrhoea, ORS and Pneumonia and Incidence of Diarrhoea and<br />
Pneumonia by <strong>District</strong>……….. ………………………………………………….. 95<br />
CHAPTER VI FAMILY PLANNING<br />
6.1<br />
6.1.1<br />
6.1.2<br />
6.1.3<br />
6.2<br />
6.2.1<br />
6.2.2<br />
6.2.3<br />
6.3<br />
6.4<br />
6.5<br />
Knowledge of Family Planning Methods…….…………………………………… 97<br />
Knowledge of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong>……………………………… 99<br />
Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV).……………..……………………… 100<br />
Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) by <strong>District</strong>.………..……………… 100<br />
Current Use of Family Planning Methods….……………..……………………… 101<br />
Current Use of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong>.…..………………………… 103<br />
Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Women.……………… 1<strong>04</strong><br />
Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Husbands…………… 106<br />
Reasons for Not Using Male Methods.…….……………..………………………… 107<br />
Source of Contraceptive Methods………….……………..……………………… 107<br />
Problems with Current Use of Contraceptive Method……..……………………… 108<br />
ii
Page<br />
6.6<br />
6.7<br />
6.7.1<br />
6.7.2<br />
6.8<br />
6.8.1<br />
6.9<br />
6.9.1<br />
Treatment for <strong>Health</strong> Problems with Current Use of Contraception……………… 109<br />
Advice to Non-Users to Use Contraception…………..…………………………. 110<br />
Future Intensions……………………………………..…………………………… 111<br />
Future Intension to Use Among Women by Number of Living Children………… 112<br />
Reasons for Discontinuation and Non-Use of Contraception……………………… 112<br />
Reasons for Not Using Contraceptive Methods…………..……………………… 114<br />
Unmet Need for Family Planning Services..……………..………………………… 114<br />
Unmet Need for Family Planning Services by <strong>District</strong>.…..……………………… 116<br />
CHAPTER VII ACCESSIBILITY AND PERCEPTION ABOUT GOVERNMENT<br />
HEALTH FACILITIES<br />
7.1<br />
7.2<br />
7.3<br />
7.4<br />
Home Visit By <strong>Health</strong> Workers……………………..…………………………… 119<br />
Home Visit By <strong>Health</strong> Worker by <strong>District</strong>..……………..………………………… 121<br />
Matter Discussed during Home Visits or Visits to <strong>Health</strong> Facilities.……………… 122<br />
Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility………………….……………..…………………………… 124<br />
7.5 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility by <strong>District</strong>..………….……..…………………………… 124<br />
7.6<br />
7.7<br />
7.8<br />
7.9<br />
7.10<br />
7.11<br />
7.12<br />
Client’s Perception of Quality of Government <strong>Health</strong> Services.………………… 125<br />
Reasons for Not Visiting Government <strong>Health</strong> Centre….………………………… 126<br />
Family Planning Services and Advice Received………….……………………… 126<br />
Availability of Pills and Condom………..…………..…………………………… 127<br />
Quality of Care of Family Planning Services……………..……………………… 128<br />
Quality of Care Indicators for Contraceptive Users by <strong>District</strong>.……….………… 129<br />
Quality of Care of Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Care….……………..………………………… 130<br />
CHAPTER VIII REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROBLEMS AND AWARENESS<br />
OF RTIs/STIs and HIV/AIDS<br />
8.1<br />
8.1.1<br />
8.2<br />
8.3<br />
8.4<br />
8.5<br />
8.5.1<br />
8.5.2<br />
8.5.3<br />
8.5.4<br />
8.5.5<br />
8.6<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI……………………………………………………………… 133<br />
Knowledge of Mode of Transmission of RTI/STI………………………………… 136<br />
Prevalence of RTI/STI……………….. …………………………………………… 138<br />
Menstruation Related Problems…………………………………………………… 143<br />
Prevalence of RTI/STI by <strong>District</strong>.………………………………………………… 144<br />
HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………………………… 145<br />
Knowledge of HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………… 145<br />
Knowledge of Mode of Transmission about HIV/AIDS…………………………… 149<br />
How to avoid HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………………… 150<br />
Misconception about HIV/AIDS…………………………………………………… 154<br />
Knowledge of Curability of HIV/AIDS…………………………………………… 155<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by <strong>District</strong>.…………….…………………… 157<br />
APPENDICES<br />
Appendix A Estimation of Sampling Errors ……………………….…………….… 159<br />
Appendix B DLHS Staff …………………………………………………………..… 165<br />
Appendix C Questionnaire ……………………………………………………..…… 169<br />
iii
Table 1.1<br />
Table 1.2<br />
Table 1.3<br />
Table 2.1<br />
Table 2.2<br />
Table 2.3<br />
Table 2.4<br />
Table 2.5<br />
Table 2.6<br />
Table 2.7<br />
Table 2.8<br />
Table 2.9<br />
Table 2.10<br />
Table 2.11<br />
Table 2.12<br />
Table 2.13<br />
Table 2.14<br />
Table 2.15<br />
Table 3.1<br />
Table 3.2<br />
Table 3.3<br />
Table 3.4<br />
Table 3.5<br />
Table 3.6<br />
Table 3.7<br />
Table 3.8<br />
Table 3.9<br />
Table 3.10<br />
Table 4.1<br />
Table 4.2<br />
Table 4.3<br />
Table 4.4<br />
Table 4.5<br />
Table 4.6<br />
Table 4.7<br />
Table 4.8<br />
Table 4.9<br />
Table 4.10<br />
Table 4.11<br />
Table 4.12<br />
Table 4.13<br />
Table 4.14<br />
Table 4.15<br />
Table 4.16<br />
TABLES<br />
Page<br />
Number of households interviewed…………….…………………..………. 7<br />
Number of women and husband interviewed……….…………………..…… 7<br />
Basic demographic indicator ……………………………………………..… 9<br />
<strong>Household</strong> population by age and sex …………………………………..…… 12<br />
<strong>Household</strong> characteristics ………………………….……………………..… 13<br />
Educational level of the household population …………………………..… 14<br />
Marital status of the household population ……………………………..…… 17<br />
Marriage ……………………………………………………………..……… 18<br />
Morbidity rates ……………………….…………………………………..… 19<br />
Morbidity rates by district……… …………………………………..……… 20<br />
Housing characteristics …………………………………………………..… 22<br />
Housing characteristics by district……….. ………………………..………. 23<br />
Iodization of salt…………………………………………………………..… 24<br />
Iodization of salt by district……… ………………………………..………. 26<br />
Distance from the nearest education facility …………………………..…… 27<br />
Distance from the nearest health facility ………………………………..…… 27<br />
Availability of services …………………………………………………..… 28<br />
Availability of facility and services by district…………. …………..……… 29<br />
Background characteristics of women …………………………………..…… 34<br />
<strong>Level</strong> of education of eligible women …………………………………..…… 35<br />
Background characteristics of men ……………………………………..…… 36<br />
<strong>Level</strong> of education of men ………………………………………………..… 37<br />
Children ever born and living …………………………………………..…… 39<br />
Children ever born and living by district ………………………………..…… 40<br />
Birth order ……………………………………………………………..…… 41<br />
Birth order by district …………………………………………………..…… 43<br />
Fertility preference ……………………………………………………..…… 44<br />
Outcomes of pregnancy ……….………………………………………..…… 44<br />
Antenatal check-up ……………………………………………………..…… 46<br />
Place of antenatal check-up ……………………………………………..…… 49<br />
Antenatal check-ups by district …………………………………………..… 50<br />
Components of antenatal check-ups ……………………………………..… 51<br />
Antenatal care ………………………………….…………………..………. 53<br />
Antenatal care indicators by district ……………………………………..… 57<br />
Pregnancy complications …….……………………………………..……… 58<br />
Treatment for pregnancy complications ………………………………..…… 60<br />
Place of delivery…………………………………………………………..… 62<br />
Assistance during home delivery and safe delivery ……………………..…… 64<br />
Reasons for not going to health institutions for delivery ………………..…… 66<br />
Delivery characteristics by district ……………………………………..…… 67<br />
Delivery complications …………………………………………………..… 68<br />
Post delivery complications ……………………………………..………. 69<br />
Treatment for post delivery complications……………………………….… 71<br />
Pregnancy, delivery and post delivery complications………………………. 72<br />
iv
Table 5.1<br />
Table 5.2<br />
Table 5.3<br />
Table 5.4<br />
Table 5.5<br />
Table 5.6<br />
Table 5.7<br />
Table 5.8<br />
Table 5.9<br />
Table 5.10<br />
Table 5.11<br />
Table 5.12<br />
Table 5.13<br />
Table 6.1<br />
Table 6.2<br />
Table 6.3<br />
Table 6.4<br />
Table 6.5<br />
Table 6.6<br />
Table 6.7<br />
Table 6.8<br />
Table 6.9<br />
Table 6.10<br />
Table 6.11<br />
Table 6.12<br />
Table 6.13<br />
Table 6.14<br />
Table 6.15<br />
Table 6.16<br />
Table 6.17<br />
Table 6.18<br />
Table 6.19<br />
Table 7.1<br />
Table 7.2<br />
Table 7.3<br />
Table 7.4<br />
Table 7.5<br />
Table 7.6<br />
Table 7.7<br />
Table 7.8<br />
Table 7.9<br />
Table 7.10<br />
Page<br />
Initiation of breastfeeding ………………………………………………..… 76<br />
Exclusive breastfeeding by child’s age ……………………………………… 77<br />
Breastfeeding by district ………………………………………………..…… 78<br />
Vaccination of children …………………………………………………..… 80<br />
Childhood vaccination received by 12 months of age ……………………… 84<br />
Source of childhood vaccination ………….…………………………..…… 86<br />
Vitamin A and IFA supplementation for children ………………………..… 87<br />
Childhood vaccination by district ………………………………………..… 89<br />
Awareness of diarrhoea …………………………………………………..… 90<br />
Treatment of diarrhoea …………………………………………………..… 91<br />
Awareness of pneumonia ………………………………………………..…… 93<br />
Treatment of pneumonia ………………………………………………..…… 94<br />
Knowledge of diarrhoea management and pneumonia by district ……..…… 95<br />
Knowledge of contraceptive methods …………………………………..…… 98<br />
Knowledge of contraceptive methods by districts ……………………..…… 99<br />
No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV)……………………………………………..… 100<br />
No-scalpel vasectomy by district ………………………………………..…… 101<br />
Contraceptive prevalence rate …………………………………………..…… 102<br />
Contraceptive prevalence rates by district………………………………..… 1<strong>04</strong><br />
Use of contraception by women ………………………………………..…… 105<br />
Use of contraception by men ……………………………………………..… 106<br />
Reasons for not using male methods ……………………………………..… 107<br />
Source of modern contraceptive methods ………………………………..… 108<br />
<strong>Health</strong> problems with current use of contraception……………………..…… 109<br />
Follow-up visit and sought treatment for health problems with current use<br />
of contraception …………………………………………………………… 110<br />
Advice on contraceptive use………………………………………..………. 111<br />
Future intention to use …………………………………………………..…… 111<br />
Future use of contraception by number of living children ……………..…… 113<br />
Reasons for discontinuation of contraception …………………………..…… 113<br />
Reason for not using contraceptive method ………….………………..…… 114<br />
Unmet need for family planning services ………………………………..… 115<br />
Unmet need by district …………………………………………………..…… 116<br />
Home visit by health worker ……………………………………………..… 120<br />
Home visit by health worker by district ………………………………..…… 122<br />
Matter discussed during contact with a health worker ….………………..… 123<br />
Visit to health facility …………………………………………………..…… 125<br />
Visit to health facility by district ………………………………………..…… 126<br />
Quality of government health facility …………………………………..…… 127<br />
Reason for not preferring government health facility …………………..…… 127<br />
Advise to adopt family planning method ………………………………..…… 128<br />
Availability of regular supply of condoms/pills …….……………………… 128<br />
Information of other modern method before sterilization ………………..… 129<br />
v
Table 7.11<br />
Table 7.12<br />
Table 7.13<br />
Table 7.14<br />
Table 8.1<br />
Table 8.2<br />
Table 8.3<br />
Table 8.4<br />
Table 8.5<br />
Table 8.6<br />
Table 8.7<br />
Table 8.8<br />
Table 8.9<br />
Table 8.10<br />
Table 8.11<br />
Table 8.12<br />
Table 8.13<br />
Table 8.14<br />
Table 8.15<br />
Table 8.16<br />
Table 8.17<br />
Table 8.18<br />
Table 8.19<br />
Page<br />
Information on side effect and follow-up for current method …………..…… 129<br />
Quality of care indicators for contraceptive users by district ……………… 130<br />
Advised to have delivery at health facility and follow-up services for post<br />
partum check-up ………………….………..…………………………..…… 131<br />
Quality of care indicators for maternal care …………….………………..… 132<br />
Source of knowledge about RTI/STI among women ……………………… 134<br />
Source of knowledge about RTI/STI among men ………………………..… 135<br />
Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of RTI/STI among<br />
women ……………………………………………………………..………. 137<br />
Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of RTI/STI among men … 138<br />
Symptoms of RTI/STI among women …………………………………..…… 139<br />
Symptoms of RTI/STI among men ……………………………………..…… 141<br />
Abnormal vaginal discharge …………………………………………..…… 142<br />
Menstruation related problems …………………………………………..… 143<br />
Reproductive health care indicators by district …………………………..… 144<br />
Source of knowledge about HIV/AIDS among women ………………..…… 146<br />
Source of knowledge about HIV/AIDS among men ……………………..…<br />
Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS among<br />
women ……………………………………………………………..……….<br />
Source of knowledge about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS among<br />
men ……………………………………………………………..…………..<br />
Knowledge about avoidance of HIV/AIDS among women ……………..…<br />
Knowledge about avoidance of HIV/AIDS among men ………………..……<br />
151<br />
152<br />
153<br />
Misconception about transmission of HIV/AIDS among women …………… 154<br />
Misconception about transmission of HIV/AIDS among men …………..… 155<br />
Knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS ……………………………..…… 156<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by district ……………………..…… 157<br />
148<br />
150<br />
vi
Figure 2.1<br />
Figure 2.2<br />
Figure 3.1<br />
Figure 3.2<br />
Figure 3.3<br />
Figure 4.1<br />
Figure 4.2<br />
Figure 4.3<br />
Figure 4.4<br />
Figure 4.5<br />
Figure 4.6<br />
Figure 4.7<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Figure 5.3<br />
Figure 5.4<br />
Figure 6.1<br />
Figure 6.2<br />
Figure 6.3<br />
Figure 7.1<br />
Figure 8.1<br />
Figure 8.2<br />
Figure 8.3<br />
Figure 8.4<br />
FIGURES<br />
Page<br />
Age-sex-pyramid ………………………………………………………..…… 11<br />
Percentage literate by age and sex ………….…………………………..…… 15<br />
Birth order 3 & above by selected background characteristic …………..…… 42<br />
Birth order 3 & above by district …………………………………..………. 42<br />
Fertility preference……………………………………………………..……… 43<br />
Source of antenatal care ………………………………………………..……… 47<br />
Full antenatal care by background characteristic ………………………..…… 56<br />
Percentage of women with pregnancy complication and by symptoms ……… 59<br />
Place of delivery and assistance during delivery ………………………..…… 61<br />
Delivery assisted by skilled person by background characteristic …………… 65<br />
Percentage of women with delivery complication and by symptoms ………… 68<br />
Percentage of women with post delivery complication and by symptoms.…… 70<br />
Initiation of breastfeeding ………………………………………………..…… 76<br />
Percentage of children age 12-23 months who have received specific<br />
vaccination ……………………………………………………………..……… 81<br />
Percentage of children age 12-23 months who have received all vaccination 83<br />
Child vaccination by age ………………………………………………..…… 85<br />
Knowledge of family planning method …………………………………..…… 98<br />
Practise of family planning methods ……………………………………..…… 103<br />
Source of family planning among current users of modern contraceptive<br />
methods ……………………………………………………………..………. 108<br />
Distribution of districts by home visit by health worker ………………..…… 121<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI by sex according to residence …………………..…… 136<br />
Symptoms of RTI/STI among women …………………………………..…… 140<br />
Symptoms of RTI/STI among husbands………………………………..……… 140<br />
Awareness of HIV/AIDS by sex according to residence ………………..…… 147<br />
Map 1<br />
Map 2<br />
Map 3<br />
Map 4<br />
Map 5<br />
Map 6<br />
MAPS<br />
Percent Girl Marrying Below Legal Age at Marriage………………………….<br />
Percentage of <strong>Household</strong>s using Salt that Contains 15 ppm <strong>Level</strong> of Iodine….<br />
Percentage of Women Received Three or More Ante Natal Check Up ………<br />
Percentage of Delivery Attended by Skilled Person………………………….<br />
Percentage of Children (age 12-23 months) Who Have Received Full<br />
Vaccination…………………………………………………………………….<br />
Current Use of Any Family Planning Method…………………………….……<br />
Page<br />
30<br />
31<br />
73<br />
74<br />
96<br />
117<br />
vii
PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Government of India had launched the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) program to ensure<br />
that couples have access to adequate information and services for reproductive health care. As a<br />
first step, family planning target has been withdrawn and an effort is being made to provide a<br />
package of reproductive services at different levels of health care centres.<br />
Monitoring of the services is also being improved. New indicators are being added to assess<br />
quality of services and provision of an integrated reproductive health care service. The <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) was initiated by Government of India and financed by the<br />
World Bank covering all the districts in the country. For the second time, district level estimates<br />
will be available for most of the critical reproductive health indicators. These important initiatives<br />
are certainly quite satisfying for all those who are concerned with taking ICPD reproductive<br />
health agenda ahead. The project is being coordinated by International Institute for Population<br />
Sciences, Mumbai and implemented by a number of consulting agencies.<br />
For the purpose of data collection, uniform questionnaires, sampling design and field procedures<br />
were used throughout the country. The survey thus provided comparable data for all the districts<br />
in the state. The present report provides salient findings of Himachal Pradesh and covered all the<br />
districts. The findings of selected indicators of reproductive and child health services from the<br />
state of Himachal Pradesh are presented in the report.<br />
It is believe that the data generated through the survey will meet requirements of the Programme<br />
Administrators and Policy Makers for making effective interventions for providing quality<br />
services and achieving multiple objectives.<br />
The DLHS-RCH could not have been successfully completed without cooperation and support<br />
from innumerable sources at various stages of the project. Although, it is not possible to<br />
acknowledge everyone involved in the survey, several organizations and individuals deserve<br />
special mention.<br />
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge Shri P.K. Hota, Secretary, Ministry of<br />
<strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India. Our special thanks are due to Shri<br />
Y.N. Chaturvedi, Shri A.R. Nanda and Shri J.V.R. Prasada Rao, former Secretaries, Department<br />
of Family Welfare, GoI, who have gave us an opportunity to participate as consulting<br />
organisation in the survey of the national importance. Our special thanks are due to Shri S.K.<br />
Sinha, Additional Director General, Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, GoI. Thanks are due<br />
to Shri K.V. Rao, Shri S.K. Das and Shri D.K. Joshi, former Chief Directors for their help. We<br />
are also thankful to Shri Partha Chattopadhyaya, Chief Director and Mr. K.D. Maiti, Director,<br />
Mrs Rashmi Verma, and Mr. Rezimohn, Assistant Director, Statistics division of MoHFW for all<br />
the support extended by them. Our special thanks are due to Dr. T.K. Roy, former Director and<br />
Senior Professor, IIPS, Mumbai, for his timely advice and valuable guidance. Thanks are due to<br />
Dr. G. Rama Rao, Officiating Director, IIPS, Mumbai. We also acknowledge the contribution of<br />
Dr. F. Ram, Dr. B. Paswan, Dr. L. Ladu Singh coordinators of the project at IIPS, Mumbai. It<br />
also gives us immense pleasure to thank Dr. G. N.V. Ramana, Public <strong>Health</strong> Specialist, World Bank,<br />
New Delhi for the able guidance and technical support to the project. We would also like to<br />
thank the NSSO, New Delhi for their help in providing UFS Block for DLHS-2.
We are thankful to Shri Lokesh Jha, Commissioner, <strong>Health</strong> & Family Welfare, Government of Jammu<br />
& Kashmir, Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family welfare for his encouragement and support for the<br />
survey work. We further acknowledge Dr. Jasbeer Singh, Director of Family Welfare, Government of<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family Welfare for his encouragement and logistic<br />
support. Thanks are due to Dr. Saleen Rehman, Assistant Director, Government of Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
Department of <strong>Health</strong> & Family welfare for his cooperation and support. Thanks are also due to<br />
officials of the Census Department at the center and the state and Officials of the NSSO and<br />
other <strong>District</strong>s authorities for all the support rendered, which facilitated us in the smooth and<br />
timely completion of the data collection.<br />
Thanks are due to UNICEF for funding the health component of the survey. We are especially<br />
thankful to Dr. C. Chandrasekhar and Dr. V. Jayachandran, for their keen interest and timely supply<br />
of necessary inputs for the successful completion of the health component of the survey. Our<br />
thanks are also due to Dr. Prema Ramachandran, Advisor, Planning Commission for her keen<br />
interest in the survey. Thanks are also due to Dr.G.N.V. Brahmam, Deputy Director, <strong>National</strong><br />
Institute of Nutrition, Hydrabad and his team members who had flown to Srinagar to train the<br />
state Laboratory Technicians in handling of thousands of blood samples for the successful<br />
completion of health component of the survey.<br />
Thanks are due to our field and supervisory staff for timely completion of the fieldwork, in-spite<br />
of difficult terrain and other field hazards. Their hard work will be truly rewarded only when results<br />
of the survey meet requirements of the user agencies, especially the Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> & Family<br />
Welfare, New Delhi. Thanks are also due to Shri Brij Kishore Yadav for his hard work in timely<br />
completion of data processing and computational work. We would be failing in our duty if we do<br />
not thank our respondents who spent their valuable time with tremendous patience.<br />
New Delhi<br />
June, 2006<br />
O.P.VIG<br />
Project Director<br />
Society for Applied Research In Humanities,<br />
x
KEY INDICATORS, Jammu & Kashmir<br />
DISTRICT LEVEL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY- REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH, (DLHS-RCH), <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Sample size<br />
<strong>Household</strong>s surveyed…………………………………<br />
Currently married women age 15-44………………..<br />
Husband’s of eligible women…………………………<br />
Characteristics of households<br />
Percent rural……………………………………………<br />
Percent Hindu………………………………………….<br />
Percent Muslim………………………………………...<br />
Percent other religion (Sikh)……….................……..<br />
Percent scheduled caste……………………………...<br />
Percent scheduled tribe……………………………….<br />
Percent with electricity………………………………...<br />
Percent with flush toilet……………………………….<br />
Percent with no toilet facility………………………….<br />
Percent living in Kachcha houses……………………<br />
Percent living in Pucca houses……………………...<br />
Percent with low standard of living…………………..<br />
Percent with high standard of living………………….<br />
Percent with iodized salt (15+ppm)………………….<br />
Characteristics of currently married<br />
women age 15-44 years<br />
Percent below age 30 ………………………………..<br />
Percent with age at first cohabitation below age 18.<br />
Percent illiterate………………………………………..<br />
Percent having 10 or more years of schooling……..<br />
Percent with illiterate husband……………………….<br />
Percent with husband 10+ years of schooling……...<br />
Marriage<br />
Mean age at marriage for boys………………………<br />
Mean age marriage for girls…………………………..<br />
Percent of boys married below age 21……………...<br />
Percent of girls married below age 18………………<br />
Fertility<br />
Mean children ever born women age 40-44 years…<br />
Percent of births of order 3 and above 1 ……………..<br />
Current use of family planning method<br />
Any method…………………………………………….<br />
Any modern method…………………………………..<br />
Pill………………………………………………………<br />
IUD……………………………………………………..<br />
Condom………………………………………………..<br />
Female sterilization…………………………………..<br />
Male sterilization……………………………………...<br />
Any traditional method………………………………...<br />
Rhythm/safe period…………………………………..<br />
Withdrawal……………………………………………...<br />
Unmet need for family planning<br />
Percent with unmet need for spacing………………..<br />
Percent with unmet need for limiting………………...<br />
Percent with total unmet need………………………..<br />
Maternal care 2<br />
Percent of women received antenatal check-ups<br />
Antenatal check-up at home………………………….<br />
Antenatal check-up in first trimester…………………<br />
Three or more visit for ANC…………………………..<br />
Two or more tetanus toxoid injections………………<br />
15,087<br />
10,308<br />
10,239<br />
75.0<br />
32.3<br />
63.6<br />
2.4<br />
10.3<br />
12.0<br />
80.4<br />
29.7<br />
21.1<br />
16.0<br />
33.2<br />
20.6<br />
27.7<br />
45.0<br />
32.4<br />
15.3<br />
60.2<br />
22.1<br />
34.1<br />
36.2<br />
25.9<br />
22.8<br />
3.9<br />
5.0<br />
3.4<br />
32.1<br />
54.8<br />
51.9<br />
4.5<br />
2.4<br />
18.1<br />
25.3<br />
1.7<br />
2.8<br />
0.7<br />
2.1<br />
14.1<br />
10.7<br />
24.8<br />
87.6<br />
0.0<br />
63.2<br />
80.2<br />
73.6<br />
Adequate Iron folic acid tablets/syrup 3 …………………<br />
Full antenatal check-up 4 …………………………………<br />
Delivery characteristics 2<br />
Delivery at home………………………………………….<br />
Delivery at government health institutions……………..<br />
Delivery at private health institutions…………………...<br />
Delivery attendant by skilled persons 5 …………………<br />
Child health<br />
Percent of children whose mother squeezed out milk<br />
from her breast 6 …………………………………………..<br />
Percent of children 7 with diarrhoea 8 who received<br />
ORS………………………………………………………..<br />
Percent of children 7 with pneumonia 8 who were taken<br />
to a health facility or provider……………………………<br />
Percent of children who received<br />
vaccinations 9<br />
BCG………………………………………………………...<br />
DPT (3 injections)…………………………………………<br />
Polio (3 drops)…………………………………………….<br />
Measles…………………………………………………….<br />
All vaccinations 10 ….………………………………………<br />
No vaccination at all. …………………………………….<br />
Percentage of women who had<br />
Pregnancy complication 2 …………………………………<br />
Delivery complication 2 ……………………………………<br />
Post delivery complication 2 ………………………………<br />
Symptoms of RTI/STI…………………………………….<br />
Problems of vaginal discharge………………………….<br />
Menstruation related problem…………………………...<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS<br />
Percent of women who have heard of RTI/STI………..<br />
Percent of women who have heard of HIV/AIDS……...<br />
Utilization of government health services<br />
Antenatal care……………………………………….<br />
Treatment for pregnancy complication…………………<br />
Treatment for post-delivery complication………………<br />
Treatment for vaginal discharge………………………...<br />
Treatment for children with diarrhoea…………………..<br />
Treatment for children with pneumonia………………...<br />
Quality of family planning services<br />
Percent non-users ever advised to adopt the family<br />
planning method…………………………………………..<br />
Percent users told about side effects of method…..….<br />
Percent users who received follow-up services……….<br />
Characteristics of husband of eligible<br />
women<br />
Percent of husband knowing NSV………………………<br />
Percent of men who have heard of RTI/STI…………...<br />
Percent of men who have heard of HIV/AIDS….……..<br />
Percentage who had any symptoms of RTI/STI………<br />
Sought treatment for RTI/STI …………………………..<br />
53.7<br />
44.4<br />
28.4<br />
55.9<br />
14.6<br />
73.1<br />
72.5<br />
69.5<br />
95.2<br />
91.5<br />
40.2<br />
41.7<br />
77.9<br />
32.0<br />
2.6<br />
40.1<br />
64.6<br />
47.3<br />
16.0<br />
0.9<br />
3.8<br />
15.3<br />
53.8<br />
66.9<br />
87.5<br />
86.1<br />
73.2<br />
80.0<br />
93.1<br />
5.9<br />
43.4<br />
10.7<br />
12.2<br />
27.2<br />
53.8<br />
6.2<br />
54.0<br />
1<br />
For births in past three years, 2 For live/still births during three years preceding the survey, 3 100 or more IFA tablets/Syrup, 4 A<br />
minimum of three visits for ANC, at least one TT injections and 100 or more IFA tablets/syrup, 5 Either institutional delivery or home<br />
delivery assisted by Doctor/ANM/nurse, 6 Children age below 3 years, 7 Last but one living children below age 3 years, 8 Last two<br />
weeks preceding the survey, 9 Last but one living children (age 12-23 months) born during three years preceding the survey. 10 BCG,<br />
three injections of DPT, three drops of polio and measles.
SALIENT FINDINGS<br />
For the assessment of district level Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> indicators, Government of<br />
India proposed to undertake district level household surveys through non-governmental agencies<br />
on an annual basis. The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) was the result of government’s<br />
initiative. In Jammu & Kashmir State, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, India was<br />
entrusted to carry out the survey work. The survey for Phase-1 of the DLHS covering seven<br />
districts of the state was conducted during April <strong>2002</strong> to December <strong>2002</strong>. The survey for Phase-2<br />
covering the remaining seven districts of the state was carried out during July 20<strong>04</strong> to December<br />
20<strong>04</strong>. The focus of the survey was on: i) Coverage of ante natal care (ANC) and immunization<br />
services, ii) Extent of safe deliveries, iii) Contraceptive prevalence rate and unmet need for family<br />
planning, iv) Awareness about RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS and v) Utilization of government health<br />
services and users’ satisfaction. The salient findings of the survey are presented here.<br />
For both the phases together, the data was collected from 15,087 households in Jammu &<br />
Kashmir State. From these households, 10,308 eligible women (usual resident or visitors who<br />
stayed in the sample household the night before the interview, currently married aged 15-44<br />
years whose marriage was consummated) and 10,239 husbands of eligible women were interviewed.<br />
Of the total households interviewed in Jammu & Kashmir State, one-fourth of the<br />
households were from urban areas. The sample households constituted of 32 percent Hindu, 64<br />
percent Muslim, over two percent Sikh and over one percent from other category. Twenty-two<br />
percent of the households belonged to either scheduled castes or scheduled tribes and 18 percent<br />
belonged to other backward class. Sixteen percent of the households lived in Kachcha houses, 51<br />
percent in semi-pacca houses and 33 percent in pucca houses. Twenty-one percent of the households<br />
were with low SLI, 52 percent with medium SLI and 28 percent with high SLI.<br />
Thirty-seven percent of the population aged seven and above was non-literate. Further, 47<br />
percent of females as against 28 percent of males were non-literate. Proportion of non-literate is<br />
much higher among the older cohort compared to the younger ones. Sixty percent of the eligible<br />
women were non-literate and 22 percent women have completed 10 or more years of schooling in the<br />
state. The level of literacy among eligible women was 40 percent as against 55 percent among their<br />
husbands in the Jammu & Kashmir State. The distribution of non-literate women shows that lesser<br />
proportion of younger women below 30 years was illiterate compared to older women 30 years<br />
and above. The scenario in respect of non-literate husbands is similar.<br />
The reporting of the marriages during three yeas prior to survey gives the mean age at<br />
marriage of boys and girls in the state as 25.9 and 22.8 years respectively. Four percent of boys and<br />
five percent of girls in the state got married before attaining the minimum legal age at marriage<br />
of 21 and 18 years respectively. The percentage of boys who got married below the legal minimum<br />
age at marriage was 10 percent or more in Badgan, Doda and Rajouri districts. Similarly, percentage<br />
of girls marrying below the legal minimum age at marriage of 18 years was 10 percent or more<br />
in Badgam, Doda and Kargil district of the state.<br />
Only 45 percent of the households were using cooking salt that was iodized at the<br />
recommended level of 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content whereas six percent of households<br />
used salts that were not iodized at all, while 48 percent households were using salt with iodine
content of 7 ppm. The proportion of households using non-iodized salt was the highest (21 percent)<br />
in Kupwara district, followed by 20 percent in Pulwama district and lowest (zero percent) in Doda,<br />
Leh, Poonch, Rajouri, Srinagar and Udhampur districts. The percentage of households using salt<br />
with 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content was the highest (99 percent) in Leh district, followed<br />
by 84 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. While 48<br />
percent or more (state average) of the households in Anantnag, Doda, Kathua, Poonch, Rajouri,<br />
Srinagar and Udhampur districts were consuming adequately iodized salt.<br />
The mean number of children ever born to a woman was 2.5 children in the state – 2.5<br />
children in rural areas and 2.3 children in urban areas. Further, mean number of children ever<br />
born to women aged 40-44 years was 3.4 children, which is close to the completed family size of<br />
the women. The completed fertility in the state varies from the lowest of 2.7 children in Doda<br />
and Leh districts to the highest of 4.4 children in Baramula district.<br />
The share of births of order 3 and above in the total births that occurred three years prior<br />
to survey was 32 percent. In most of the district, proportion of higher order births is quite high,<br />
ranging from the lowest of seven percent in Poonch district to the highest of 56 percent in<br />
Baramula district.<br />
The data collected on the utilization of ANC services for the women who had their last<br />
live/ still birth during three years prior to survey shows that the ANC coverage in the state was<br />
quite high as 88 percent of the women received at least one ante-natal care during pregnancy.<br />
Two-third of the women visited government health facility as against 16 percent women who<br />
visited private health facility for ANC. The percent of women who got some kind of ANC during<br />
pregnancy range between 56 percent in Doda district to 98 percent in Baramula district. In five<br />
out of 14 districts 90 percent or more women got ANC.<br />
Though 88 percent of the women in Jammu & Kashmir State received ANC, only 59, 89<br />
and 75 percent of the women had check-up of weight, blood pressure and abdomen respectively.<br />
Seventy-seven percent women received Iron and Folic Acid (IFA) tablets and 81 percent got at<br />
least one TT injection. A full package of ANC including minimum three ANC visits, at least one<br />
TT injection and 100 or more IFA tablets/Syrup was received by over 44 percent women.<br />
Minimum three ANC and timing of first check up are crucial for maternal and childcare.<br />
Eighty percent of the women in Jammu & Kashmir State made three or more ANC visit, while<br />
63 percent of the women visited health facility for the first antenatal check-up in the first trimester<br />
of pregnancy. The extent of women who had ANC in first trimester varies from minimum of 24<br />
percent in Poonch district to the maximum of 93 percent in Baramula district. Similarly, extent<br />
of women who received three or more ANC varies from minimum of 33 percent in Poonch district<br />
to the maximum of 98 percent in Baramula district.<br />
Over 70 percent of the total deliveries in Jammu & Kashmir State were conducted in health<br />
institutions; 26 percentages point up from RCH Round-I. Fifty-six percent institutional deliveries<br />
were conducted in government institutions as against 15 percent in private institution. Only nine<br />
percent of the total deliveries, that took place at home, were assisted by midwifery trained persons<br />
i.e. doctor and ANM/Nurse/LHV and 40 percent by TBA. Thus, 49 percent of the deliveries, 22<br />
percent points up from RCH Round-I, were assisted by skilled personnel in the state. The extent<br />
of institutional deliveries varies from the lowest of 23 percent in Poonch districts to the highest<br />
xiv
of 95 percent in Kargil district. Safe deliveries vary from the lowest of 30 percent in Kathua district<br />
to the highest of 95 percent in Kargil district. The extent of the institutional deliveries was the<br />
highest (74 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (64 percent)<br />
for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percent of institutional deliveries was the<br />
highest (77 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (51 percent) for women with low<br />
SLI. The variation in the institutional deliveries by women’s economic status is much conspicuous<br />
than that by women’s education.<br />
In Jammu & Kashmir State, 40, 65 and 47 percent of the women experienced pregnancy,<br />
delivery and post delivery complications respectively. Eighty-one percent of the women sought<br />
treatment for the pregnancy and 83 percent for the post-delivery complications. The pregnancy<br />
complication varies from the lowest of four percent in Kathua district to the highest of 58 percent<br />
in Kargil district. The incidence of all the three types of complications seems to be linked with each<br />
other. In the districts where the incidence of pregnancy complications is high, the incidence of<br />
delivery and post-delivery complications is also high.<br />
In most of the districts and the state as a whole, the practice of breast-feeding is quite high.<br />
However, only 59 percent of the women breastfed the child within two hours of birth, while 87<br />
percent women breastfed the child within one day of birth. More than one-tenth of the women started<br />
breastfeeding the child after one day of birth. There is great deal of variation in the pattern of breastfeeding<br />
across the districts. The extent of women initiating breastfeeding within two hours of birth<br />
was the highest (97 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts and the lowest (10 percent) in<br />
Kathua district.<br />
In Jammu & Kashmir State, 91, 40, 42 and 78 percent of the children received the BCG<br />
vaccine, three doses of DPT and Polio vaccine, and measles vaccine respectively. There is 13<br />
percentage points drop from BCG to measles. It means that large numbers of children who have<br />
contact with service providers are missed out of subsequent services. The complete schedule of<br />
immunization including BCG, three doses of DPT and Polio each and measles was received by<br />
32 percent of the children, whereas three percent of the children did not at all receive any vaccination<br />
under routine programme. Thirty-nine percent of the children received supplementation of at-least<br />
one dose of vitamin-A and only 12 percent children received IFA tablets/liquid for iron supplementation.<br />
The extent of complete immunization consisting of BCG, three injections of DPT, three<br />
doses of Polio and measles was the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district and the highest (50<br />
percent) in Baramula district. The percentage of children who received complete immunization<br />
was higher than that of the state (39 percent) in Baramula and Jammu districts and in the remaining<br />
12 districts it was below the state level. In Jammu & Kashmir State, 70 percent of the women<br />
were aware of diarrhoea management and 60 percent were aware of Oral Rehydration Salt (ORS).<br />
During the two-week period prior to survey, children of eight percent of the women suffered from<br />
diarrhoea, while over 69 percent of the women treated diarrhoea among children by giving ORS.<br />
In comparison to awareness about diarrhoea management, the awareness about danger sings of<br />
pneumonia is quite low. Only 31 percent of the women reported awareness about danger sings of<br />
pneumonia. One-fifth of the women reported that their children suffered from cough, cold and<br />
difficulty in breathing in two-week period prior to survey and 95 percent sought treatment.<br />
The knowledge of family planning methods is universal in all districts of Jammu & Kashmir<br />
xv
State, with 97 percent of the women reporting knowledge of one method or the other. However,<br />
the knowledge of any spacing method was marginally low, but the proportion per se was quite<br />
high (82 percent). The knowledge of any modern methods was also universal in all the districts,<br />
though the knowledge of all modern methods was only 32 percent. The proportion knowing all<br />
modern methods (males and females’ sterilization, IUD, oral pills and condom) varies from less<br />
than one percent in Badgam district to 73 percent in Pulwama district.<br />
In DLHS, knowledge about No-scalpel vasectomy has been asked to husbands of eligible<br />
women. Only 12 percent of the husbands were aware of no-scalpel vasectomy in the state. The<br />
proportion of husbands knowing No-scalpel vasectomy varies from less than one percent in<br />
Baramula, Doda and Rajouri districts to 37 percent in Leh district.<br />
The contraceptive prevalence rate (any methods) in the state was 55 percent, seven<br />
percent point up from RCH Round-I, comprising of prevalence of 52 percent of modern methods<br />
and three percent of traditional methods. Twenty-seven percent of the couples adopted sterilization.<br />
The percentage of user of the male methods of sterilization and condom was only 20 percent.<br />
There appears to be negative association between contraceptive use and female education. The<br />
contraceptive prevalence rate was the highest (91 percent) in Leh district, followed by 87 percent<br />
in Kargil district and the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district.<br />
In Jammu & Kashmir State, one-fourth of the women were found to have unmet need for<br />
family planning, with about 11 percent for limiting and over 14 percent for spacing. The total unmet<br />
need varies from the highest (66 percent) in Doda district, followed by 59 percent in Baramula<br />
district and the lowest (three percent) in Leh district.<br />
Only three percent of the women in the state reported that either ANM/LHV or health<br />
worker visited them at their residence at least once in the past three months. Fifty-four percent of<br />
the women were home visited by ANM/LHV as against 37 percent by Male health worker, while<br />
the doctor visited 13 percent of the women. Further, three-fourth (76 percent) of the women were<br />
satisfied with the amount of time spent with them by the health workers, while 90 percent of the<br />
women were satisfied services/advise given to them.<br />
Five percent or more women reported home visit in Jammu, Srinagar and Udhampur districts,<br />
while in the remaining 11 districts of Ananatnag, Badgam, Baramula, Doda, Kargil, Kathua,<br />
Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch and Rajouri districts it was below the state average of three percent.<br />
The percentage of the eligible women who needed to visit health facility during three months<br />
prior to survey and visited any health facility was 10 percent as against 37 percent women who<br />
needed to visit health facility and not visited it. Fifty-four percent women visited government<br />
health facility and 42 percent women visited private health facility, while the remaining visited<br />
ISM and other health facility. Main reasons given by the women for not visiting the government<br />
health facility were ‘not-conveniently located’ or ‘time is not suited’ or ‘poor quality of services’<br />
or ‘heavy rush’ or ‘non/rare availability of doctors/health worker’ or ‘doctors/health workers do<br />
not examine properly’ or ‘medicine not/rarely given or of bad quality’ or ‘doctors/paramedical<br />
staff does not behave properly’.<br />
The district level variation in the utilization of the government health facilities ranges from<br />
xvi
22 percent in Anantnag district to 100 percent in Leh district. The percentage of women who<br />
visited private health facility ranges from zero percent in Leh district to 76 percent in Anantnag<br />
district.<br />
In Jammu & Kashmir State 15 and 54 percent of the women were aware of RTI/STI and<br />
HIV/AIDS respectively. The level of awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS among husbands of<br />
eligible women was 27 and 68 percent respectively. The percent of women who were aware of<br />
RTI/STI was the highest (90 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 46 percent in Leh district<br />
and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. Similarly, percent of women who were aware of<br />
HIV/AIDS was the highest (92 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 91 percent in Leh<br />
district and the lowest (11 percent) in Rajauri district.<br />
Awareness level of husbands of eligible women of RTI/STI was the highest (91 percent)<br />
in Baramula district, followed by 52 percent in Leh district and the lowest (over one percent) in<br />
Kathua district. Similarly, awareness level of husbands of eligible women of HIV/AIDS was the<br />
highest (99 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 97 percent in Baramula district<br />
and the lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district. Out of 14 districts, in 9 districts the<br />
awareness of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (68 percent) for men and in five<br />
districts it was higher than that of the state (54 percent) for women.<br />
Sixteen percent of women and six percent of husbands of eligible women in the state<br />
reported having at least one symptoms of RTI/STI. In most of the districts the reported prevalence of<br />
RTI/STI among husbands was quite low. The prevalence of RTI/STI among women was the highest<br />
(27 percent) in Kargil and Udhampur districts, followed by 26 percent in Jammu district and the<br />
lowest (two percent) in Baramula and Doda districts. Similarly, prevalence of RTI/STI among<br />
husbands of eligible women was the highest (14 percent) in Udhampur district, followed by 13<br />
percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero percent) in Baramula district.<br />
Only one percent of the women reported vaginal discharge in the state - lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kupwara, Pulwama, Poonch and Srinagar districts and highest<br />
(eight percent) in Leh district. Sixty-two percent of the women sought treatment for vaginal<br />
discharge problem and 54 percent of the husbands with at least one symptoms of RTI/STI sought<br />
treatment. The percentage of women who sought treatment of vaginal discharge was higher than<br />
that of the state (62 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil, Kathua, Rajouri and Udhampur districts and it was<br />
lower than that of the state in Doda, Jammu and Leh districts, while in the remaining six districts<br />
no cases of abnormal vaginal discharge were reported.<br />
xvii
CHAPTER I<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1 Background and Objectives of the <strong>Survey</strong><br />
The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme that has been launched by Government of<br />
India (GoI) in 1996-97 is expected to provide quality services and achieve multiple objectives. It<br />
ushered a positive paradigm shift from method-oriented, target-based activity to providing clientcentred,<br />
demand-driven quality services. Also, efforts are being made to reorient provider’s<br />
attitude at grassroots level and to strengthen the services at outreach levels.<br />
The new approach requires decentralization of planning, monitoring and evaluation of the<br />
services. The district being the basic nucleus of planning and implementation of the RCH programme,<br />
Government of India has been interested in generating district level data on utilization of the<br />
services provided by government health facilities, other than that based on service statistics. It is<br />
also of interest to assess people’s perceptions on quality of services. Therefore, it was decided to<br />
undertake <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) under the RCH programme in the country.<br />
The Round-I of RCH survey was conducted during the year 1998–99 in two phases (each<br />
phase covered half of the districts from all states/union territories) in 5<strong>04</strong> districts for which<br />
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai was designated as the nodal agency.<br />
In Round-II, survey was completed during <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong> in 593 districts as per the 2001<br />
Census. In DLHS-RCH, information about RCH has been collected using a slightly modified<br />
questionnaire. In Round II, some new dimensions, such as test of cooking salt to assess the<br />
consumption of salt fortified with iodine, collection of blood of children, adolescents and pregnant<br />
women to assess the level of anaemia, and measurement of weight of children to assess the nutritional<br />
status, were incorporated.<br />
The main focus of the DLHS-RCH has been on the following aspects:<br />
‣ Coverage of ANC & immunization services<br />
‣ Proportion of safe deliveries<br />
‣ Contraceptive prevalence rates<br />
‣ Unmet need for family planning<br />
‣ Awareness about RTI/ STI and HIV/AIDS<br />
‣ Utilization of government health services and users’ satisfaction.<br />
For the purpose of conducting DLHS-RCH, all the states and the union territories were<br />
grouped into 16 regions. A total of twelve research organizations including Population Research Centres<br />
(PRCs) were involved in conducting the survey in 16 regions with IIPS as the nodal agency.<br />
1.2 <strong>Survey</strong> Design<br />
In Round-II, a systematic, multi-stage stratified sampling design was adopted. In each district, 40
Primary Sampling Units (PSUs – Villages/Urban Frame Size) were selected with probability<br />
proportional to size (PPS) using the 1991 Census data. All the villages were stratified according<br />
to population size, and female literacy was used for implicit arrangement within each strata. The<br />
number of PSUs in rural and urban areas was decided on the basis of percent of urban population<br />
in the district. However, a minimum of 12 urban PSUs were selected in each district in case the percent<br />
urban was low. The target sample size in each district was set at 1,000 complete residential households<br />
from 40 selected PSUs. In the second stage, within each PSU, 28 residential households<br />
were selected with Circular Systematic Random Sampling (CSRS) procedure after house listing.<br />
In order to take care of non-response due to various reasons, sample was inflated by 10 percent<br />
(i.e. 1,100 households).<br />
For selecting the urban sample, the <strong>National</strong> Sample <strong>Survey</strong> Organization (NSSO)<br />
provided the list of selected urban frame size (UFS) blocks in the district. The UFS blocks were<br />
made available separately for each district for urban areas. The maps of selected blocks were<br />
obtained from the NSSO field office located in each state/union-territory.<br />
But in each state, in two districts, the PSUs that were surveyed in Round-I of DLHS-<br />
RCH (also known as RHS-RCH) were also selected for survey in Round-II. This was done in<br />
order to measure the changes more accurately. Two districts, one with the highest proportion of<br />
safe delivery and another with the lowest proportion of safe delivery among those surveyed<br />
during Round I of the survey were selected for this purpose. In all other districts, fresh sample of<br />
PSUs were selected.<br />
1.3 House Listing and Sample Selection<br />
The household listing operation was carried out in each of the selected PSU segment prior to the<br />
data collection that provided the necessary frame for selecting the households. The household listing<br />
operation also involved preparation of location map and layout sketch map of the structures and<br />
recording the details of the households in these structures in each selected PSU. This exercise was<br />
carried out by independent teams each comprising of one lister, one mapper and one supervisor under<br />
the overall guidance and monitoring of the survey coordinator of households of the selected regional<br />
agencies.<br />
A complete listing of households was carried out in villages with households up to 300. In<br />
case of villages with more than 300 households but less than or equal to 600 households, two<br />
segments of more or less same size were formed and one segment was selected at random and<br />
household listing was carried out. In case of villages with more than 600 households, segments each<br />
of about 150 households were formed and two segments were selected for listing using the<br />
systematic random sampling method.<br />
Small villages with less than 50 households were linked with a nearest village. After combining<br />
it with the nearest village, the same sampling procedure was adopted as mentioned above. For the<br />
urban PSUs, the selected UFS blocks needed no segmentation as they were of almost equal size<br />
and contained less than 300 households.<br />
No replacement was made if a selected household was absent during data collection.<br />
However, if a PSU was inaccessible, a replacement of PSU with similar characteristics was<br />
selected by the IIPS and provided to the regional agency for survey.<br />
2
1.4 Questionnaire<br />
DLHS-RCH collected information on various indicators pertaining to RCH that would assist<br />
policymakers and programme managers to formulate and implement the goals set for RCH<br />
programmes. The International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, the Nodal Agency<br />
for DLHS–RCH project has made necessary modifications in the two Questionnaires: <strong>Household</strong><br />
Questionnaire and Women’s Questionnaire and added three more Questionnaires i.e., Husband’s<br />
Questionnaire, Village Questionnaire and <strong>Health</strong> Questionnaire, in consultation with MoHFW<br />
and World Bank. These Questionnaires were discussed and finalized in training cum workshop organized<br />
at IIPS during the first week of November 2001.<br />
These modified questionnaires had been canvassed in round II of the DLHS–RCH survey,<br />
taking into consideration the views of all the regional agencies involved. The house–listing teams<br />
and the interviewers and the supervisors for the main survey were given rigorous training based<br />
on the manuals developed for the purpose by the Nodal Agency.<br />
All the questionnaires were bilingual, with questions in both regional and English language.<br />
The Details of questionnaires are as follows:<br />
<strong>Household</strong> Questionnaire: The household questionnaire lists all usual residents in each<br />
sample household including visitors who stayed in the household the night before the interview.<br />
For each listed household member, the survey collected basic information on age, sex, and<br />
marital status, relationship to the head of the household, education and the prevalence /incidence<br />
of tuberculosis, blindness and malaria. Information was also collected on the main source of<br />
drinking water, type of toilet facility, source of lighting, type of cooking fuel, religion and caste<br />
of household head and ownership of other durable goods in the household. In addition, a test<br />
was conducted to assess whether the household used cooking salt that has been fortified with<br />
iodine. Besides, details of marriages and deaths, which happen to usual residents within reference<br />
period, were collected. Efforts were also made to get information about maternal deaths.<br />
Women Questionnaire: Women questionnaire is designed to collect information from currently<br />
married women age 15 – 44 years who are usual residents of the sample household or visitors<br />
who stayed in the sample household the night before the interview. The women questionnaire covered<br />
the following sections:<br />
Section I: Background Characteristics: In this section the information collected on age,<br />
educational status and birth and death history of biological children including still birth, induced<br />
and spontaneous abortions.<br />
Section II: Antenatal, Natal and Post natal Care: In this section the questionnaire collect<br />
information only from the women who had live birth, still birth, spontaneous or induced abortion<br />
during last three years preceding the survey date. The information on whether women received<br />
antenatal and postpartum care, who attended the delivery and the nature of complications during<br />
pregnancy for recent births were also collected.<br />
Section III: Immunization and childcare: This section gives information about feeding<br />
3
practices, the length of breastfeeding, immunization coverage and recent occurrence of diarrhoea,<br />
and pneumonia for young children (below age 3 years).<br />
Section IV: Contraception: This section provides information on knowledge and use of<br />
specific family planning methods. Questions were included about reasons for non-use, intentions<br />
about future use, desire for additional child, sex preference for next child etc.<br />
Section V: Assessment of quality of Government health services and client satisfaction.<br />
In this section the questions are targeted to assess the quality of family planning and health services<br />
provided by Government health facilities. The information was also collected about the rating of<br />
Government health facilities and staffs and reasons for not visiting to government health facility<br />
by eligible woman.<br />
Section VI: Awareness about RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS: In this section the information<br />
were collected about women’s knowledge of RTI/STI about awareness, Source of knowledge,<br />
aware of mode of transmission, curability, symptoms and treatment seeking behaviour. About<br />
HIV/AIDS; Awareness, Source of knowledge, aware of mode of transmission and prevention etc<br />
were canvassed.<br />
Husband Questionnaire: In DLHS-RCH, round II, husband questionnaire was used to collect<br />
information from eligible women’s husbands about age, educational status, knowledge and<br />
source of knowledge of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS reported symptoms of RTI/STI and male<br />
participation. Apart from these information desires for children, reasons for not using F.P.<br />
methods, future intention to use F.P. methods and knowledge about no scalpel vasectomy (NSV)<br />
has also been collected.<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Questionnaire: In DLHS-RCH, round II, a health questionnaire is included. The information<br />
collected were on weight of children age 0–71 months old and the blood sample to assess the<br />
haemoglobin levels of children age 0–71 months old, adolescents 10–19 years old and pregnant<br />
eligible women. This information is useful for assessing the levels of nutrition prevailing in the<br />
population and prevalence of anaemia among women, adolescent girls and children.<br />
Village Questionnaire: A village questionnaire is also added in this round of DLHS. The information<br />
collected on the availability and accessibility of various facilities in the village especially on<br />
accessibility of educational and health facilities.<br />
1.5 Fieldwork and Sample Coverage<br />
The fieldwork for RCH Round-II was done in two phases. During Phase-I, seven 8districts were<br />
covered from April <strong>2002</strong> to December <strong>2002</strong> and remaining seven districts were covered during<br />
Phase-II from July 20<strong>04</strong> to December 20<strong>04</strong>. During Round-II, a total of 15,087 households were<br />
covered. From these surveyed households, 10,308 currently married women aged 15-44 years and<br />
10,239 husbands of eligible women were interviewed.<br />
1.6 Data processing<br />
All the five types of completed questionnaires were brought to the headquarter of regional agencies<br />
and data were processed using microcomputers. The process consisted of office editing of the<br />
4
questionnaires, data entry, data cleaning and tabulation. Data cleaning included validation, range<br />
and consistency checks. For both data entry and tabulation of the data, IIPS developed the software<br />
package. The district and state level reports were prepared by regional agency whereas national<br />
report is prepared by the nodal agency.<br />
1.7 Sample Weights<br />
In generating district level demographic indicator sample weight for household, women and<br />
husband, weight have been used and these for a particular district are based on three selection<br />
probabilities f 1 i , f 2<br />
i<br />
and f 3<br />
i<br />
pertaining to i th PSU of the district. These probabilities are defined as<br />
f i 1 = Probability of selection of i th PSU in a district<br />
(<br />
)<br />
=<br />
n H i<br />
H<br />
Where, nr<br />
is the number of rural PSU to be selected in a district, H i<br />
refers to the number of<br />
household in the i th PSU and H = ∑ Hi , total number of household in a district.<br />
r *<br />
f i 2<br />
= Probability of selecting segment (s) from segmented PSU<br />
(in case the i th selected PSU is segmented)<br />
= (Number of segments selected after segmentation of PSU) / (number of segment created a PSU)<br />
The value of f i 2 is to be equal to one for un-segmented PSU.<br />
f i 3<br />
= probability of selecting a household from the total listed households of a PSU or in<br />
segment(s) of a PSU<br />
=<br />
28* HR<br />
HL<br />
i<br />
i<br />
Where HR i is the household response rate of the i th sampled PSU and HL i is the number of<br />
households listed in i th PSU in a district.<br />
For urban PSU, f 1<br />
i<br />
is computed either as the ratio of number of urban PSUs to be included from<br />
the district to the total number of UFS blocks of the district or as the ratio of urban population of the<br />
selected PSU to the total urban population of the district.<br />
The probability of selecting a household from the district works out as;<br />
f i i i i<br />
= ( f * f f )<br />
1 2<br />
*<br />
3<br />
5
The non-normalized household weight for the i th<br />
normalized weight used in the generation of district indicators as<br />
PSU of the district is, w i<br />
=<br />
1 , while the<br />
f i<br />
n d i<br />
=<br />
∑ n i<br />
i<br />
i<br />
∑ n i * w<br />
i<br />
i<br />
* w<br />
, i= 1,2,3……………40.<br />
Where n i is the number of households interviewed in the i th PSU. The weight for women and<br />
husband are computed in the similar manner after multiplication of expression for f i by the<br />
corresponding response rate. State weights for households, women and husbands are further derived<br />
from the district weights ni d for the i th psu in d th district using external control so that for sample<br />
results do not deviate from the corresponding information about the population.<br />
Let, ns = ∑<br />
i<br />
d<br />
n i and N I = ∑<br />
i<br />
d<br />
N i , denote the number of households in the sample and census of<br />
a particular state, then state level households weights are work out as;<br />
n s i = n d i *<br />
⎛<br />
⎜n<br />
⎝<br />
⎛<br />
⎜ N i<br />
⎝<br />
d<br />
i<br />
d<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
ns<br />
⎠<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
N sc<br />
⎠<br />
, where n d i household sample in i th district, n s is the total sample in the<br />
state, N i d is the census population in the ith district and N sc is the census population in the state.<br />
These households’ weights are controlled for rural-urban separately.<br />
Considering sample and census currently married women in 15-44 years and married males<br />
above 15 years for specified state by districts and rural-urban residence, state level women and<br />
husbands’ weights are obtained for estimation of state level indicators.<br />
1.8 Sample Implementation<br />
Table 1.1 shows the period of fieldwork, number of households interviewed and household’s<br />
response rates. A total of 15,087 households were interviewed, three-fourth were rural. The overall<br />
household response rate – the number of households interviewed per 100 occupied households<br />
was 99.8 percent. The household response rate was 97 percent or more in every district.<br />
Table 1.2 gives number of women and husbands interviewed by district in Jammu & Kashmir<br />
state. Number of interviews completed was 10,308 currently married women who are the usual<br />
member of the household or stayed night before the household interview and 10,239 husbands of<br />
eligible women. The response rate for women - number of women interviewed per 100 identified<br />
eligible women was 95.7 percent. Similarly, response rate for husbands was 95.3 percent. The response<br />
6
Table 1.1 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS INTERVIEWED<br />
Month and year of fieldwork and number of households interviewed by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
State/<strong>District</strong><br />
Month and year<br />
of field work<br />
Number of households interviewed<br />
From To Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Response<br />
rate<br />
State<br />
State-phase I<br />
State-phase II<br />
-<br />
<strong>04</strong>/<strong>2002</strong><br />
07/20<strong>04</strong><br />
-<br />
12/2003<br />
12/20<strong>04</strong><br />
15,087<br />
-<br />
-<br />
11,310<br />
-<br />
-<br />
3,777<br />
-<br />
-<br />
99.8<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Kathua<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
12/<strong>2002</strong><br />
07/<strong>2002</strong><br />
<strong>04</strong>/<strong>2002</strong><br />
07/2003<br />
12/<strong>2002</strong><br />
07/<strong>2002</strong><br />
08/<strong>2002</strong><br />
02/2003<br />
12/<strong>2002</strong><br />
09/<strong>2002</strong><br />
12/2003<br />
03/2003<br />
12/<strong>2002</strong><br />
02/2003<br />
1,092<br />
1,110<br />
1,112<br />
1,118<br />
1,092<br />
1,087<br />
1,102<br />
761<br />
608<br />
775<br />
782<br />
1,092<br />
1,087<br />
768<br />
331<br />
502<br />
337<br />
336<br />
0<br />
0<br />
334<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
99.9<br />
99.6<br />
100.0<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Kargil<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
09/20<strong>04</strong><br />
08/20<strong>04</strong><br />
09/20<strong>04</strong><br />
08/20<strong>04</strong><br />
07/20<strong>04</strong><br />
08/20<strong>04</strong><br />
07/20<strong>04</strong><br />
11/20<strong>04</strong><br />
12/20<strong>04</strong><br />
10/20<strong>04</strong><br />
10/20<strong>04</strong><br />
12/20<strong>04</strong><br />
11/20<strong>04</strong><br />
12/20<strong>04</strong><br />
1,123<br />
1,110<br />
1,119<br />
931<br />
1,076<br />
944<br />
1,071<br />
760<br />
778<br />
784<br />
931<br />
751<br />
686<br />
747<br />
363<br />
332<br />
335<br />
0<br />
325<br />
258<br />
324<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
97.3<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Note: Table based on unweighted cases.<br />
of women was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula and Poonch districts and the lowest (69<br />
percent) in Badgam district, while it was 96 percent for the state. Further, women’s response rate<br />
was higher than that of the state in eight districts and lower than that of the state in sis districts.<br />
Similarly, response rate of husband’s was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula and Poonch<br />
districts and the lowest (64 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 95 percent for the state. The<br />
response rate of husbands was higher than that of the state in Doda, Jammu, Kathua, Poonch,<br />
Rajouri, Udhampur, Anantnag, Baramula, Kupwara and Pulwama districts, while in the remaining<br />
four districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />
Table 1.2 NUMBER OF WOMEN AND HUSBANDS INTERVIEWED<br />
Number of women and husbands interviewed by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
State/<strong>District</strong><br />
Number of women interviewed<br />
Response<br />
Number of husbands interviewed<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban rate Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Response<br />
rate<br />
State<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
95.7<br />
10,239<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
95.3<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Kathua<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
779<br />
854<br />
763<br />
878<br />
824<br />
614<br />
969<br />
551<br />
514<br />
534<br />
599<br />
824<br />
614<br />
757<br />
228<br />
340<br />
229<br />
279<br />
0<br />
0<br />
212<br />
99.6<br />
98.4<br />
99.0<br />
100.0<br />
99.0<br />
88.2<br />
99.8<br />
776<br />
838<br />
736<br />
878<br />
822<br />
590<br />
964<br />
548<br />
500<br />
516<br />
599<br />
822<br />
590<br />
757<br />
228<br />
338<br />
220<br />
279<br />
0<br />
0<br />
207<br />
99.2<br />
96.5<br />
97.4<br />
100.0<br />
98.8<br />
84.8<br />
99.7<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Kargil<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
698<br />
432<br />
881<br />
475<br />
831<br />
484<br />
826<br />
511<br />
308<br />
625<br />
475<br />
597<br />
349<br />
593<br />
187<br />
124<br />
256<br />
0<br />
234<br />
135<br />
233<br />
98.6<br />
68.8<br />
100.0<br />
95.0<br />
95.2<br />
94.2<br />
95.2<br />
698<br />
400<br />
881<br />
473<br />
851<br />
484<br />
848<br />
511<br />
289<br />
625<br />
473<br />
612<br />
349<br />
610<br />
187<br />
111<br />
256<br />
0<br />
239<br />
135<br />
238<br />
98.6<br />
63.9<br />
100.0<br />
94.6<br />
97.5<br />
94.2<br />
97.7<br />
Note: Table based on unweighted cases.<br />
7
1.9 Basic Demographic Profile of the State<br />
Strategically located Jammu & Kashmir State constitutes the northern most extremity of India.<br />
Situated between 32 0 17’ and 36 0 58’ north latitude and 73 0 26’ and 80 0 30’ east longitude. The<br />
total area of the State is 22,22,236 sq. kms. including 78,114 sq. kms. under the illegal occupation of<br />
Pakistan and 42,685 sq. kms. under that of China, of which Pakistan illegally handed over 5,130 sq.<br />
kms. to China. The state is bounded by Pakistan, Afghanistan and China from the West to East.<br />
The State has four geographical zones of<br />
1. Sub-mountain and semi-mountain plain known as kandi or dry belt,<br />
2. The Shivalak ranges.<br />
3. The high mountain zone consisting the Kashmir Valley, Pir Panchal ranges and its offshoots<br />
including Doda, Poonch and Rajouri districts and part of Kathuaand Udhampur<br />
districts.<br />
4. The middle run of the Indus River comprising Leh and Kargil.<br />
The State of Jammu & Kashmir is the northern most state of India comprising three distinct<br />
climatic regions viz. Arctic cold desert areas of Ladakh, temperate Kashmir valley and sub-tropical<br />
region of Jammu. There is a sharp rise of altitude from 1,000 feet to 28,250 feet above sea level<br />
within state’s four degree of latitude. The climate varies from tropical in Jammu plains to semi-arctic<br />
cold in Ladakh with Kashmir and Jammu mountainous tracts having temperate climatic conditions.<br />
The rainfall also varies from region to region with 92.6 mm in Leh, 650.5 mm in Srinagar and 1115.9<br />
mm in Jammu. A large part of the state forms part of the Himalayan Mountains. The state is geographically<br />
constituted of rocks varying from the oldest period of the earth’s history to the youngest present day<br />
river and lake deposits. The population of Jammu & Kashmir state was 101. 43 lakh in 2001. The State<br />
ranks 6 th in area and 17 th in population among the States and Union Territories of India. The State<br />
consists of 14 districts, 59 tehsils. 119 blocks, three municipalities, 54 towns and notified area<br />
committee, 6477 inhabited villages and 281 uninhabited villages.<br />
The State is well connected with rest of the country by air, rail and road. The Indian<br />
Airlines and private airlines operate regular flights to Srinagar, Jammu and Leh. The <strong>National</strong><br />
Highway 1-A connects the capital cities of Srinagar and Jammu with rest of the country. There are<br />
daily passenger trains connecting Jammu with most of the major cities of the country.<br />
Table 1.3 gives basic demographic indicators of Jammu & Kashmir State. The decadal growth<br />
rate of the Jammu & Kashmir State was 29.4 percent as against 21.5 of the country in 2001, the<br />
difference being eight percentage points. The state population was growing at a rate faster than that<br />
of the country. Further, the annual exponential growth rate was 2.55 percent for the state as<br />
against 1.95 percent for the country in 2001. The urban population of the state was 24.8 percent<br />
as against 28.0 percent of the country- the state was lagging behind the country in urbanization.<br />
The scheduled caste population in the state has declined from 15.8 percent in 1981 to 7.6 percent<br />
in 2001. On the other hand, schedule tribe population in the state has increased from 7.8 percent<br />
in 1981 to 10.9 percent in 2001. The female literacy rate was 43 percent in the state as against<br />
53.7 percent in the country in 2001 - difference of 11 percent points. The male literacy rate was 67<br />
percent in the state as against 75 percent in the country in 2001- difference of eight percent points. In<br />
8
Table 1.3 BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATOR<br />
Basic demographic indicator of India, state and districts, Census 2001<br />
India/state/district<br />
Population<br />
(in thousand)<br />
Percentage<br />
urban<br />
Percentage<br />
decadal<br />
growth rate 1<br />
Percentage literate 7+<br />
Sex<br />
ratio 2 Male Female Persons<br />
India<br />
1,028,737<br />
28.0<br />
21.5<br />
933<br />
75.3<br />
53.7<br />
64.8<br />
State<br />
10,143<br />
24.8<br />
29.4<br />
892<br />
66.6<br />
43.0<br />
55.5<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Kathua<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajouri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
692<br />
1,589<br />
550<br />
373<br />
483<br />
1,202<br />
743<br />
6.9<br />
44.1<br />
14.3<br />
6.4<br />
7.0<br />
78.7<br />
15.7<br />
26.8<br />
28.4<br />
20.9<br />
28.1<br />
25.2<br />
31.4<br />
26.9<br />
903<br />
868<br />
901<br />
919<br />
878<br />
851<br />
860<br />
64.0<br />
84.4<br />
75.7<br />
65.0<br />
69.8<br />
69.6<br />
67.1<br />
29.9<br />
68.5<br />
54.4<br />
36.0<br />
44.5<br />
48.1<br />
41.2<br />
47.9<br />
77.0<br />
65.6<br />
51.2<br />
58.0<br />
59.8<br />
55.2<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Kargil<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh<br />
Pulwama<br />
1,172<br />
629<br />
1,170<br />
119<br />
650<br />
117<br />
653<br />
14.4<br />
11.2<br />
33.5<br />
8.9<br />
3.9<br />
24.4<br />
10.5<br />
32.7<br />
26.5<br />
15.7<br />
31.4<br />
38.6<br />
30.4<br />
24.5<br />
922<br />
930<br />
947<br />
837<br />
906<br />
823<br />
945<br />
57.6<br />
53.5<br />
82.6<br />
75.8<br />
56.1<br />
75.6<br />
60.7<br />
34.4<br />
30.6<br />
67.2<br />
42.4<br />
28.7<br />
52.7<br />
37.7<br />
46.5<br />
42.5<br />
75.1<br />
60.8<br />
43.2<br />
65.3<br />
49.6<br />
Source: Primary Census Abstract, Series 20, Census of India, 2001. 1 1991-2001, 2 Females per 1,000 males.<br />
other words, male literacy rate is catching up with that of the country. The sex ratio was 892 in the<br />
state as against 933 in the country in 2001, which means that female deficiency was more serious<br />
in the state. The population density was 46 persons per km. in the state as against 313 persons<br />
per km. in the country in 2001.<br />
The percentage of urban population was the highest (79 percent) in Srinagar district,<br />
followed by 44 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (four percent) in Kupwara district. The<br />
percentage of urban population was higher than that of the state (25 percent) in Jammu, Srinagar<br />
and Baramula districts, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than that of the state. In<br />
five districts it was less than 10 percent. The decadal growth rate was the highest (38.6 percent)<br />
in Kupwara district, followed by 31.4 percent in Srinagar and Kargil districts and the lowest<br />
(15.7 percent) in Baramula district, while it was 29 percent for the state. The decadal growth rate<br />
was lower than that of the state in nine districts. The sex ratio was the highest (947) in Baramula<br />
district, followed by 945 in Pulwama district and the lowest (823) in Leh district, while it was 892<br />
in the state.<br />
The male literacy rate was the highest (84.4 percent) in Jammu district, followed by 82.6<br />
percent in Baramula district and the lowest (53.5 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 68.6<br />
percent in the state. Similarly, female literacy rate was the highest (68.5 percent) in Jammu<br />
district, followed by 67.2 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (28.7 percent) in Kupwara<br />
district, while it was 43 percent for the state. The sex differential in the literacy rate was the<br />
highest (34 percent points) in Doda district, followed by 33 percent points in Kargil district and<br />
the lowest (16 percent points) in Jammu district, while it was 26 percent points in the state.<br />
9
CHAPTER II<br />
BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLD<br />
This chapter provides a socio-economic and demographic profile of households interviewed in<br />
the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong>-Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong>. Facilities and services such<br />
as <strong>Health</strong>, Education and Communication available in the representative sampled village are also<br />
presented here. The de facto procedure of enumeration is adopted in order to include every individual<br />
staying in the sampled household the night before the survey. The objective of adopting the de<br />
facto method is to avoid duplication of persons who are in transit.<br />
2.1 Age –Sex Structure<br />
Table 2.1 gives percent distribution of the household population by age and by residence and sex<br />
in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percent distribution is based on sampled de facto population of<br />
81,594 persons of whom 79 percent lived in the rural areas and 21 percent in urban areas of<br />
Delhi. The NCT of Delhi depicts a young and growing population with 30 percent below the age<br />
of 15 years (Figure 2.1). There are more children below 15 years recorded in rural areas (31<br />
percent) compared to those in urban areas (27 percent).<br />
Figure 2.1<br />
Age-sex pyramid<br />
80+<br />
75-79<br />
70-74<br />
65-69<br />
60-64<br />
55-59<br />
50-54<br />
45-49<br />
40-44<br />
35-39<br />
30-34<br />
25-29<br />
20-24<br />
15-19<br />
10-14<br />
5-9<br />
0-4<br />
Female<br />
Male<br />
8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8<br />
Percent<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
The overall sex ratio of sample population was 110 males per 100 females as against 112<br />
of 2001 census. The sex ratio of the rural sample population was 111 as against 109 of the census.<br />
Similarly, sex ratio of sample urban population was 107 as against 122 of the census.
Table 2.1 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY AGE AND SEX<br />
Percent distribution of the household population by age and by residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Age<br />
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />
Less than 1<br />
0.8<br />
1-4<br />
5.9<br />
5-9<br />
11.4<br />
10-14<br />
12.2<br />
15-19<br />
12.2<br />
20-24<br />
9.4<br />
25-29<br />
8.2<br />
30-34<br />
7.3<br />
35-39<br />
7.5<br />
40-44<br />
5.4<br />
45-49<br />
6.7<br />
50-54<br />
3.9<br />
55-59<br />
2.9<br />
60-64<br />
2.4<br />
65-69<br />
1.7<br />
70-74<br />
1.0<br />
75-79<br />
0.5<br />
80+<br />
0.5<br />
Total percent 100.0<br />
Number of<br />
persons<br />
81,594<br />
Sex ratio 1 110<br />
0.7<br />
6.1<br />
11.5<br />
12.0<br />
11.8<br />
9.5<br />
7.9<br />
7.0<br />
7.3<br />
6.1<br />
5.8<br />
4.5<br />
3.0<br />
2.7<br />
1.8<br />
1.2<br />
0.5<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
42,777<br />
NA<br />
0.8<br />
5.7<br />
11.3<br />
12.5<br />
12.5<br />
9.4<br />
8.6<br />
7.7<br />
7.7<br />
4.6<br />
7.7<br />
3.3<br />
2.9<br />
2.1<br />
1.5<br />
0.9<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
100.0<br />
38,818<br />
NA<br />
0.7<br />
6.0<br />
11.9<br />
12.6<br />
12.3<br />
9.4<br />
8.1<br />
7.4<br />
7.4<br />
5.4<br />
6.4<br />
3.7<br />
2.8<br />
2.3<br />
1.6<br />
1.0<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
100.0<br />
62,681<br />
111<br />
0.7<br />
6.1<br />
12.0<br />
12.2<br />
12.1<br />
9.5<br />
7.9<br />
7.0<br />
7.2<br />
6.1<br />
5.6<br />
4.3<br />
2.8<br />
2.6<br />
1.8<br />
1.2<br />
0.5<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
33,001<br />
NA<br />
0.8<br />
5.9<br />
11.7<br />
13.1<br />
12.6<br />
9.2<br />
8.4<br />
7.8<br />
7.7<br />
4.7<br />
7.3<br />
3.0<br />
2.8<br />
2.1<br />
1.5<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
100.0<br />
29,680<br />
NA<br />
0.8<br />
5.7<br />
9.8<br />
11.0<br />
11.6<br />
9.6<br />
8.6<br />
7.3<br />
7.7<br />
5.3<br />
7.6<br />
4.8<br />
3.3<br />
2.7<br />
1.9<br />
1.2<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
18,914<br />
107<br />
0.8<br />
6.0<br />
9.6<br />
11.3<br />
11.1<br />
9.2<br />
7.9<br />
7.2<br />
7.8<br />
6.1<br />
6.4<br />
5.2<br />
3.6<br />
3.0<br />
2.1<br />
1.2<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
9,776<br />
NA<br />
0.8<br />
5.3<br />
9.9<br />
10.6<br />
12.1<br />
9.9<br />
9.2<br />
7.3<br />
7.6<br />
4.5<br />
8.9<br />
4.4<br />
3.0<br />
2.3<br />
1.6<br />
1.3<br />
0.6<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
9,138<br />
NA<br />
Note: Table is based on the de facto population, i.e. persons who stayed in the household the night before the interview (including<br />
both usual resident and visitors).<br />
1<br />
Male per 100 females. NA: Not applicable.<br />
2.2 <strong>Household</strong> Characteristics<br />
Table 2.2 gives percent distribution of the household head by selected background characteristics<br />
of the household head and household size by residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />
of male household heads was 96 percent in the state – 97 percent in rural areas and 92 percent in<br />
urban areas. Similarly, percentage of female household head was four percent in the state – three<br />
percent in rural areas and eight percent in urban areas. Nearly three-fourth of the household head<br />
were in the age group 30-59 years and one-fifth in the age group 60+ years, while five percent<br />
household head were below 30 years. The median age of household heads was over 46 years in<br />
the state - 46 years in rural areas and 48 years in urban areas. Majority of the household heads<br />
were Muslim (64 percent) and 32 percent were Hindu, while the remaining four percent belongs<br />
to other religions. Hindus constitute a higher proportion of population in urban areas (53 percent)<br />
while Muslim constitute a higher proportion of population in rural areas (71 percent). Majority of<br />
the household heads were from other castes (58 percent), 18 percent from OBC, 12 percent scheduled<br />
tribe and 10 percent scheduled caste, while caste of over two percent household heads was not known.<br />
One-member households were less than one percent, while two-members households were<br />
three percent. Similarly, 3-5 members households were over 53 percent and 6-8 member households<br />
were over 36 percent. In other words, 11 percent of the households consisted of 1-3 usual members.<br />
12
Table 2.2 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS<br />
Percent distribution of the household head by selected characteristics of the household head and household size, according to<br />
residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Characteristic<br />
Sex of the household head<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Age of the household head<br />
< 30<br />
30-44<br />
45-59<br />
60+<br />
Median age of the household head<br />
Religion of the household head<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Christian<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Missing<br />
Caste/tribe of the household head<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other #<br />
Don’t know<br />
Missing<br />
Total<br />
95.8<br />
4.2<br />
5.2<br />
38.8<br />
35.6<br />
20.4<br />
46.5<br />
32.3<br />
63.6<br />
0.3<br />
2.4<br />
1.2<br />
0.1<br />
10.3<br />
12.0<br />
17.6<br />
57.7<br />
2.2<br />
0.2<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
97.1<br />
2.9<br />
5.6<br />
40.3<br />
34.6<br />
19.5<br />
46.0<br />
25.5<br />
71.5<br />
0.2<br />
1.5<br />
1.1<br />
0.2<br />
9.9<br />
14.0<br />
20.0<br />
52.9<br />
2.9<br />
0.2<br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
92.1<br />
7.9<br />
4.1<br />
34.5<br />
38.3<br />
23.1<br />
48.1<br />
52.9<br />
40.0<br />
0.5<br />
5.1<br />
1.4<br />
0.1<br />
11.3<br />
5.9<br />
10.6<br />
72.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
Number of usual members<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9+<br />
Mean household size<br />
Total percent<br />
Number of households<br />
0.5<br />
3.2<br />
7.5<br />
19.6<br />
26.3<br />
18.9<br />
11.3<br />
6.3<br />
6.4<br />
5.4<br />
100.0<br />
15,088<br />
Note: Table is based on the de jure population<br />
# Higher caste (Not belonging to a scheduled caste, a scheduled tribe and an other backward class)<br />
0.3<br />
2.6<br />
6.9<br />
18.3<br />
26.1<br />
19.5<br />
12.2<br />
7.1<br />
7.0<br />
5.5<br />
100.0<br />
11,310<br />
1.1<br />
4.7<br />
9.2<br />
23.7<br />
26.8<br />
17.4<br />
8.4<br />
3.9<br />
4.8<br />
5.0<br />
100.0<br />
3,777<br />
Further, 46 percent households consisted of 4-5 members and over 36 percent households consisted of<br />
6-8 members. However, percentage of households consisting of 9+ usual members was over six<br />
percent in the state – seven percent in rural areas and five percent in urban areas. .<br />
2.3 Educational <strong>Level</strong><br />
Table 2.3 gives percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and<br />
years of schooling, according to age, sex and residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />
of non-literate population was 37 percent in the state- 47 percent females and 28 percent males. Over<br />
one-fifth of the population aged 7-9 years was non-literate irrespective of sex in the state. The<br />
proportion non-literate declines in the age group 10-14 years, which increases thereafter in each<br />
successive age group. So much so, more than 60 percent of the female population aged 30+ years<br />
13
Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />
Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age,<br />
residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Age<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
Total<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
Total<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
Nonliterate<br />
21.0<br />
8.8<br />
10.6<br />
17.3<br />
33.8<br />
40.7<br />
59.3<br />
28.2<br />
22.0<br />
14.1<br />
18.7<br />
39.0<br />
63.1<br />
74.8<br />
85.6<br />
46.6<br />
21.5<br />
11.4<br />
14.5<br />
27.8<br />
48.2<br />
57.2<br />
70.4<br />
Literate but<br />
no schooling<br />
0.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
14.2<br />
Years of schooling<br />
1-5 6-8 9-10<br />
TOTAL<br />
Male<br />
77.6 0.6 0.0<br />
40.4 46.7 3.7<br />
2.7 19.4 43.3<br />
3.7 11.4 26.3<br />
4.4 13.7 24.8<br />
4.5 11.4 26.2<br />
4.3 8.1 16.1<br />
76.1<br />
38.0<br />
2.9<br />
4.3<br />
5.6<br />
5.0<br />
3.5<br />
14.2<br />
76.9<br />
39.2<br />
2.8<br />
4.0<br />
5.0<br />
4.8<br />
4.0<br />
16.3<br />
Female<br />
0.7<br />
43.8<br />
17.4<br />
10.5<br />
8.3<br />
6.1<br />
3.6<br />
13.6<br />
Total<br />
0.6<br />
45.3<br />
18.4<br />
11.0<br />
11.1<br />
8.8<br />
6.2<br />
21.7<br />
0.0<br />
3.8<br />
40.5<br />
19.8<br />
12.7<br />
8.2<br />
4.4<br />
14.2<br />
0.0<br />
3.8<br />
42.0<br />
23.2<br />
18.9<br />
17.5<br />
11.2<br />
11 or<br />
more<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
24.0<br />
41.2<br />
23.3<br />
17.1<br />
12.1<br />
19.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
20.5<br />
26.4<br />
10.2<br />
5.8<br />
2.7<br />
11.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
22.3<br />
34.0<br />
16.9<br />
11.6<br />
8.1<br />
Missing<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Total<br />
Percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of<br />
persons<br />
2,725<br />
5,126<br />
5,066<br />
7,426<br />
6,135<br />
5,081<br />
6,133<br />
37,692<br />
2,442<br />
4,861<br />
4,854<br />
6,979<br />
5,947<br />
4,782<br />
4,482<br />
34,347<br />
5,167<br />
9,987<br />
9,921<br />
14,405<br />
12,083<br />
9,863<br />
10,615<br />
Total<br />
37.0<br />
0.1<br />
14.2<br />
15.0<br />
18.1<br />
15.5<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
72,<strong>04</strong>0<br />
Note: The table is based on de jure population<br />
Contd.<br />
was non-literate in the state. The percentage of non-literate population aged 50+ years was 70<br />
percent in the state - 86 percent females and 59 percent males. Further, 14 percent of the<br />
population aged 7 + years had 1-5 years of schooling in the state irrespective of sex. Over 16<br />
percent of males as against about 14 percent of females had 6-8 years schooling, while it was 15<br />
percent for the state. Similarly, 22 percent of males as against 14 percent of females had 9-10<br />
years of schooling, while it was 18 percent for the state. The percentage of population aged 7+<br />
years who had studied for 11 or more years was over 15 percent in the state – 11 percent females<br />
and 19 percent males. Figure 2.2 shows percentage literate by age and sex.<br />
More than three-fourth of males as well females aged 7-9 years had 1-5 years of schooling.<br />
Over four-tenth of males as against 38 percent of females aged 10-14 years have had 1-5 years of<br />
schooling. The sex differential in educational attainment starts after primary (1-5 years) education,<br />
when males are having edge over females in higher education of 6-8 years, 9-10 years and 11 or more<br />
years. However, only less than one percent of the total population are found literate without any<br />
formal schooling in the state irrespective of sex.<br />
An examination of the educational attainment by place of residence has revealed that the<br />
rural-urban differential was quite pronounced. Forty-one percent of the total population in rural<br />
14
Figure 2.2<br />
Percentage Literate by Age and Sex<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Percent<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
7-9 10-14 15-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50+<br />
Age<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />
Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age ,<br />
residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Age<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
Nonliterate<br />
23.5<br />
10.3<br />
12.2<br />
19.7<br />
38.0<br />
46.1<br />
69.2<br />
Literate<br />
but no<br />
schooling<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Years of schooling<br />
1-5 6-8 9-10<br />
RURAL<br />
Male<br />
75.0 0.5 0.0<br />
39.9 45.4 4.0<br />
3.1 20.9 42.4<br />
4.2 12.6 26.2<br />
4.7 13.8 24.5<br />
4.7 12.0 25.2<br />
3.9 6.7 13.2<br />
11 or<br />
more<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
21.3<br />
37.4<br />
19.0<br />
12.0<br />
7.0<br />
Missing<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Total<br />
Percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of<br />
persons<br />
2,179<br />
4,017<br />
3,979<br />
5,747<br />
4,670<br />
3,853<br />
4,530<br />
Total<br />
31.8<br />
0.1<br />
14.4<br />
16.6<br />
20.9<br />
16.1<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
28,975<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
24.7<br />
16.5<br />
21.7<br />
45.9<br />
70.6<br />
84.4<br />
94.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
73.4<br />
37.5<br />
3.1<br />
4.5<br />
5.6<br />
4.2<br />
2.4<br />
0.9<br />
42.5<br />
18.5<br />
10.9<br />
7.9<br />
4.7<br />
1.4<br />
Female<br />
0.0<br />
3.2<br />
39.9<br />
18.8<br />
9.7<br />
4.9<br />
1.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
16.7<br />
19.9<br />
6.1<br />
1.7<br />
0.4<br />
0.6<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,936<br />
3,895<br />
3,752<br />
5,229<br />
4,585<br />
3,558<br />
3,212<br />
Total<br />
52.0<br />
0.1<br />
14.2<br />
13.4<br />
12.5<br />
7.7<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
26,166<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
24.1<br />
13.4<br />
16.8<br />
32.2<br />
54.1<br />
64.5<br />
79.7<br />
0.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
74.2<br />
38.7<br />
3.1<br />
4.3<br />
5.2<br />
4.4<br />
3.3<br />
0.7<br />
44.0<br />
19.8<br />
11.8<br />
10.9<br />
8.5<br />
4.5<br />
Total<br />
0.0<br />
3.6<br />
41.2<br />
22.7<br />
17.2<br />
15.5<br />
8.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
19.1<br />
29.1<br />
12.6<br />
7.0<br />
4.2<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
4,115<br />
7,912<br />
7,731<br />
10,976<br />
9,256<br />
7,410<br />
7,742<br />
Total<br />
41.4<br />
0.1<br />
14.3<br />
15.1<br />
16.9<br />
12.1<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
55,141<br />
Contd.<br />
areas as against over 22 percent in urban areas was non-literate. Again, 17 percent of the population<br />
in rural areas as against 22 percent of the population in urban areas had 9-10 years of schooling.<br />
15
Table 2.3 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />
Percent distribution of household population age 7 and above by literacy level and years of schooling, according to age ,<br />
residence and sex, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Age<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
Nonliterate<br />
10.9<br />
3.2<br />
4.4<br />
9.3<br />
20.4<br />
23.8<br />
31.6<br />
Literate<br />
but no<br />
schooling<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Years of schooling<br />
1-5 6-8 9-10<br />
URBAN<br />
Male<br />
88.1 0.8 0.0<br />
42.2 51.4 2.8<br />
1.4 13.8 46.6<br />
2.2 7.6 26.7<br />
3.3 13.5 25.7<br />
4.1 9.5 29.3<br />
5.4 12.0 24.2<br />
11 or<br />
more<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
33.9<br />
54.2<br />
37.1<br />
33.4<br />
26.6<br />
Missing<br />
0.1<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
Total<br />
Percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of<br />
persons<br />
546<br />
1,109<br />
1,088<br />
1,679<br />
1,465<br />
1,228<br />
1,603<br />
Total<br />
16.0<br />
0.0<br />
13.6<br />
15.6<br />
24.2<br />
30.5<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
8,717<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
11.7<br />
4.5<br />
8.4<br />
18.3<br />
38.0<br />
46.8<br />
63.0<br />
1.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.4<br />
86.6<br />
40.0<br />
2.0<br />
3.6<br />
5.3<br />
7.6<br />
6.3<br />
0.0<br />
48.9<br />
13.6<br />
9.3<br />
9.6<br />
10.2<br />
9.3<br />
Female<br />
0.0<br />
6.3<br />
42.6<br />
22.6<br />
23.0<br />
17.8<br />
12.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
33.4<br />
46.0<br />
24.1<br />
17.7<br />
8.6<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
506<br />
966<br />
1,102<br />
1,750<br />
1,362<br />
1,224<br />
1,270<br />
Total<br />
29.4<br />
0.2<br />
14.1<br />
14.2<br />
19.7<br />
22.3<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
8,181<br />
7-9<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50+<br />
11.3<br />
3.8<br />
6.4<br />
13.9<br />
28.9<br />
35.2<br />
45.5<br />
0.6<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
87.4<br />
41.2<br />
1.7<br />
3.0<br />
4.2<br />
5.8<br />
5.8<br />
0.4<br />
50.2<br />
13.7<br />
8.4<br />
11.6<br />
9.8<br />
10.8<br />
Total<br />
0.0<br />
4.4<br />
44.6<br />
24.6<br />
24.4<br />
23.6<br />
19.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
33.6<br />
50.0<br />
30.8<br />
25.5<br />
18.7<br />
0.3<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,052<br />
2,075<br />
2,190<br />
3,429<br />
2,827<br />
2,452<br />
2,873<br />
Total<br />
22.5<br />
0.1<br />
13.9<br />
14.9<br />
22.0<br />
26.5<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
16,898<br />
Similarly, 12 percent of the population in rural areas as against over 26 percent in urban areas<br />
had 11 or more years of schooling. On the other hand, there was no rural-urban differential for<br />
the educational level 1-5 years and 6-8 years.<br />
Further, percentage of non-literate males was 32 percent in rural areas as against 16<br />
percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of non-literate females was 52 percent in rural areas<br />
as against 29 in urban areas. Again, percentage of males who had studied for 9-10 years was 21<br />
percent in rural areas as against 24 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of females who<br />
had studied for 9-10 years was over 12 percent in rural areas as against 20 percent in urban areas.<br />
The percentage of males who had studied for 11 or more years was 16 percent in rural areas as<br />
against over 30 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of females who had studied for 11 or<br />
more years was eight percent in rural areas as against 22 percent in urban areas. The rural-urban<br />
differential was 14 percentage points both for females and males.<br />
2.4 Marital Status of the <strong>Household</strong> Population<br />
Table 2.4 gives percent distribution of household population aged 10 years and above by<br />
16
Table 2.4 MARITAL STATUS OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION<br />
Percent distribution of the household population aged 10 years and above by marital status, according to age and sex, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Marital status<br />
Age<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-44<br />
45-59<br />
60+<br />
Never<br />
Married<br />
97.3<br />
96.9<br />
91.4<br />
58.5<br />
7.2<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
Currently<br />
married<br />
2.1<br />
2.3<br />
7.6<br />
40.8<br />
91.7<br />
94.4<br />
81.8<br />
Married, gaunna<br />
not performed<br />
Male<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
0.3<br />
1.0<br />
2.3<br />
Widowed/ divorced/<br />
Separated<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.3<br />
0.7<br />
3.7<br />
15.2<br />
Total Percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of persons<br />
5,126<br />
5,066<br />
4,051<br />
3,375<br />
8,753<br />
5,668<br />
2,927<br />
Total<br />
46.5<br />
50.6<br />
0.8<br />
2.1<br />
100.0<br />
34,967<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-44<br />
45-59<br />
60+<br />
97.5<br />
97.1<br />
73.1<br />
22.0<br />
1.6<br />
0.5<br />
1.1<br />
1.7<br />
2.3<br />
26.4<br />
77.1<br />
96.7<br />
91.6<br />
58.2<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.1<br />
2.2<br />
Female<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
1.2<br />
6.9<br />
38.5<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
4,861<br />
4,854<br />
3,642<br />
3,337<br />
7,743<br />
5,390<br />
2,079<br />
Total<br />
40.8<br />
54.4<br />
0.7<br />
4.0<br />
100.0<br />
31,906<br />
10-14<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-44<br />
45-59<br />
60+<br />
97.4<br />
97.0<br />
82.7<br />
40.4<br />
4.6<br />
0.7<br />
0.9<br />
1.9<br />
2.3<br />
16.5<br />
58.8<br />
94.1<br />
93.0<br />
72.0<br />
0.7<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.1<br />
2.3<br />
Total<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.4<br />
1.0<br />
5.3<br />
24.8<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
9,987<br />
9,921<br />
7,693<br />
6,711<br />
16,496<br />
11,058<br />
5,006<br />
Total<br />
43.8<br />
52.4<br />
0.8<br />
3.0<br />
100.0<br />
66,873<br />
Note: Table is based on de facto population<br />
marital status, according to age and sex in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of currently married<br />
females was two percent in the age group 10-14 years, over two percent in the age group 15-19 years, 26<br />
percent in the age group 20-24 years, followed by 77 percent in the age group 25-29 years and 97<br />
percent in the age group 30-44 years. The proportion never married in the age group 30-44 years was<br />
over seven percent for males and about two percent for females. The proportion of divorced, separated<br />
or widowed was negligible and limited for both the sexes until below 60 years of age. The proportion of<br />
divorced, separated or widowed in the age group 60 years or above was over 38 percent for females and<br />
15 percent for males. Among the de facto population aged 10 years and above, 51 percent of males and<br />
54 percent of females were currently married.<br />
2.5 Marriage<br />
Marriage in the household is an important event that reflects the socio-cultural practices of the<br />
communities surveyed in DLHS. This section outlines the marriages ceremonies during the three<br />
years period prior to the survey. Mean age at marriage by sex and percentage of total marriages<br />
which are below legal age at marriage, 21 years for boys and 18 years for girls by resident at the<br />
state and at district levels are shown in Table 2.5. The mean age at marriage of boys was the highest<br />
(27.6 years) in Leh district, followed by 27.5 years in Udhampur district and the lowest (22.3 years)<br />
in Srinagar district. The mean age at marriage of boys was higher than that of the state (25.9 years) in<br />
17
Table 2.5 MARRIAGE<br />
Mean age at marriage and percentage of marriages below legal at marriage by sex and by districts, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Place of residence/<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Mean age at marriage<br />
Percentage of marriage below legal age at marriage<br />
Boy Girl Boy (
Table 2.6 MORBIDITY RATES<br />
Prevalence of blindness, tuberculosis, and malaria, according to place of residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Morbidity<br />
Prevalence rate of blindness<br />
Male<br />
Partial<br />
Complete<br />
Night blindness<br />
Total<br />
854<br />
299<br />
131<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
983<br />
347<br />
132<br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
410<br />
140<br />
130<br />
Female<br />
Partial<br />
Complete<br />
Night blindness<br />
738<br />
191<br />
173<br />
880<br />
203<br />
123<br />
280<br />
161<br />
334<br />
Persons<br />
Partial<br />
Complete<br />
Night blindness<br />
799<br />
248<br />
151<br />
934<br />
277<br />
128<br />
347<br />
145<br />
233<br />
Prevalence rate of tuberculosis<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Person<br />
253<br />
214<br />
234<br />
284<br />
247<br />
265<br />
150<br />
118<br />
135<br />
Prevalence rate of malaria 1<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Person<br />
95<br />
123<br />
108<br />
111<br />
134<br />
122<br />
40<br />
87<br />
63<br />
Note: All the rates refer to de jure population. Prevalence rate per 100, 000 population<br />
Reference period: - January 1 st , 1999 to survey date for phase-1, and January 1 st , 2001 to survey date for phase-2. 1 Last two<br />
weeks prior to the survey<br />
females, while it was 799 for the population. In other words, prevalence of partial blindness was<br />
more among males than among females, and more in rural areas than in urban areas. Similarly,<br />
prevalence rate of complete blindness was 277 in rural areas and 145 in urban areas, while it was<br />
248 for the state. The prevalence rate of complete blindness was 299 for males and 191 for<br />
females, while it was 248 for the population. The data have shown that prevalence of complete<br />
blindness was more among males than among females, and more in rural areas than in urban<br />
areas. The prevalence rate of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was 128 in rural areas<br />
and 233 in urban areas. The prevalence rate of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was<br />
131 among males and 173 among females, while it was 151 for the population. The prevalence<br />
of night blindness due to vitamin-A deficiency was more among females than among males.<br />
Tuberculosis<br />
The prevalence rate of tuberculosis was 265 in rural areas and 135 in urban areas, while it was<br />
234 for the state. Again, prevalence rate of tuberculosis was 253 for males and 214 for females,<br />
while it was 234 for the population. These data have shown that prevalence of tuberculosis was<br />
higher among males than among females, and higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />
Malaria<br />
In the DLHS-RCH, household respondents were asked to state whether any member of their household<br />
suffered from malaria (characterized by recurrent fever with shivering) any time during the<br />
two weeks prior to survey. The prevalence rate of malaria was 122 in rural areas and 63 in urban<br />
19
areas, while it was 108 for the state. Again, prevalence rate of malaria was 95 for males and 123<br />
for females, while it was 108 for the population. In other words, prevalence of malaria was higher in<br />
rural areas than urban areas, and higher among females than among males.<br />
2.7 Morbidity Rates by <strong>District</strong>s<br />
Table 2.7 gives prevalence rate of blindness, tuberculosis and malaria by district in Jammu & Kashmir<br />
State. The prevalence rate of partial blindness was the highest (2275) in Srinagar district, followed by<br />
1773 in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero) in Baramula district, while it was 799 for the state.<br />
The prevalence rate of complete blindness was the highest (871) in Kathua district, followed by<br />
619 in Jammu district and the lowest (11) in Baramula district. The prevalence rate of complete<br />
blindness was lower than that of the state (248) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Doda, Kargi,<br />
Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch, Rajouri and Udhampur districts, while in the remaining three<br />
districts it was higher than that of the state.<br />
Table 2.7 MORBIDITY RATES BY DISTRICTS<br />
Prevalence of blindness, tuberculosis, and malaria, by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Prevalence 1 of morbidity<br />
Partial blindness Complete blindness Tuberculosis Malaria 2<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
678<br />
942<br />
0<br />
26<br />
161<br />
73<br />
59<br />
11<br />
15<br />
619<br />
82<br />
1<strong>04</strong><br />
0<br />
27<br />
96<br />
198<br />
20<br />
0<br />
14<br />
139<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
337<br />
249<br />
1,664<br />
217<br />
1,773<br />
246<br />
871<br />
43<br />
214<br />
34<br />
273<br />
401<br />
869<br />
60<br />
845<br />
209<br />
376<br />
19<br />
136<br />
11<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
18<br />
373<br />
2,275<br />
390<br />
34<br />
80<br />
269<br />
190<br />
18<br />
25<br />
213<br />
129<br />
18<br />
160<br />
130<br />
25<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
799<br />
Note: All the rates refer to de jure population. 1 Prevalence rate per 100, 000 population<br />
Reference period: - January 1 st , 1999 to survey date for phase-1, and January 1 st , 2001 to survey date for phase-2. 2 Last two<br />
weeks prior to the survey<br />
Further, prevalence rate of tuberculosis was the highest (869) in Kupwara district, followed<br />
by 845 in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero) in Baramula district. The prevalence rate of<br />
tuberculosis was higher than that of the state (234) in Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama districts,<br />
while in the remaining 10 districts it was lower than that of the state. The prevalence rate of malaria<br />
was the highest (376) in Kathua district, followed by 209 in Kargil district and the lowest (zero)<br />
in Baramula district, while it 108 for the state.<br />
2.8 Housing Characteristics<br />
Table 2.8 gives percent distribution of the household by housing characteristics and percentage<br />
of households owning selected durable goods by residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. Eighty<br />
percent of the households were having electricity connection in the state – 76 percent in rural areas<br />
248<br />
234<br />
108<br />
20
and 94 percent in urban areas. In other words, about one-fourth of the households were not having<br />
any electricity connection in rural areas of the state.<br />
The percentage of household having tap inside the house as source of drinking water was<br />
38 percent in the state – 29 percent in rural areas and 67 percent in urban areas. Similarly, 34<br />
percent of the households in rural areas as against 18 percent in urban areas were getting drinking<br />
water through public tap, while it was 30 percent in the state. Thus, over 68 percent of the<br />
households were having tap as source of drinking water in the state – 63 percent in rural areas<br />
and 84 percent in urban areas. The other sources of safe drinking water were ‘hand pump/bore<br />
well’ (12 percent) and ‘well covered’ (two percent). Thus, 82 percent of the households were<br />
getting safe drinking water to drink in the state – 77 percent in rural areas and 97 percent in urban<br />
areas. That is, about one-fourth of the households were not getting potable water for drinking in rural<br />
areas of the state.<br />
The percentage of the households having own flush toilets was 30 percent in the state –<br />
19 percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. Similarly, household having own pit<br />
toilet/latrine was 37 percent in the state- 41 percent in rural areas and over 23 percent in urban<br />
areas. Further, percentage of households using shared toilet of any type was 11 percent and two<br />
percent were using public/community toilets. The percentage of households having no toilet<br />
facility was 21 percent in the state – 26 percent in rural areas and seven percent in urban areas.<br />
DLHS-RCH has also collected data on type of fuel used in the households for cooking.<br />
Thirty-eight percent of the households were using liquid petroleum/gas or electricity for cooking<br />
in the state – 27 percent in rural areas and 68 percent in urban areas. Only 12 percent of the<br />
households were using kerosene for cooking food. Again, over 42 percent of the households<br />
were using wood in the state - 49 percent in rural areas and 22 percent in urban areas. Nine percent<br />
of the households in rural areas as against three percent households in urban areas were using<br />
other types of fuel for cooking, while it was over seven percent for the state.<br />
There is considerable variation in the quality of housing. On the basis of building material,<br />
type of floor, walls and roof, households are categorised into kachcha, semi-pucca and pucca.<br />
Sixteen percent of the households were living in kachcha houses, 51 percent in semi pucca<br />
houses and 33 percent in pucca houses. Sixty-one percent of the urban households live in pucca<br />
houses, while 57 percent of rural households live in semi-pucca houses.<br />
The possession of consumer durable goods is an indication of a household’s socioeconomic<br />
status. Table 2.8 shows that majority of the households in the state owned fan (60<br />
percent), radio/transistor (80 percent) and television (62 percent). Other durable goods owned by<br />
the household were telephone (14 percent), sewing machine (35 percent), bicycle (15 percent) and<br />
motorcycle/scooter (11 percent). Over three percent of the households owned Car/jeep, while over<br />
one percent households owned tractor. Ownership of most of the consumer durable items is more<br />
among the urban households than among the rural households.<br />
Considering household amenities, such as, source of drinking water, type of house,<br />
source of lighting, fuel for cooking, toilet facility and ownership of durable goods a composite<br />
measure, standard of living index (SLI) is made for classification of households. The standard of<br />
living index is calculated as by adding the following scores;<br />
21
Table 2.8 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS<br />
Percent distribution of the household by housing characteristics and percentage of households owing selected durable goods,<br />
according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Housing characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Electricity<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
80.4<br />
19.4<br />
75.9<br />
23.9<br />
94.0<br />
5.9<br />
Source of drinking water<br />
Tap inside<br />
Tap shared public<br />
Hand pump/ bore well<br />
Well covered<br />
Well uncovered<br />
River<br />
Pond<br />
Spring<br />
Other<br />
38.4<br />
30.1<br />
11.7<br />
2.1<br />
3.6<br />
3.7<br />
1.7<br />
8.4<br />
0.1<br />
28.9<br />
34.2<br />
11.5<br />
2.6<br />
4.7<br />
4.8<br />
2.1<br />
10.7<br />
0.2<br />
66.7<br />
17.7<br />
12.1<br />
0.7<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.5<br />
1.4<br />
0.0<br />
Sanitation facility<br />
Own flush toilet<br />
Own pit toilet / latrine<br />
Shared toilet of any type<br />
Public / community toilet<br />
No toilet facility<br />
29.7<br />
36.6<br />
10.6<br />
1.7<br />
21.1<br />
18.7<br />
41.0<br />
12.7<br />
1.7<br />
25.7<br />
62.7<br />
23.5<br />
4.5<br />
1.8<br />
7.3<br />
Main type of fuel used for cooking<br />
Liquid petroleum gas/ electricity<br />
Kerosene<br />
Wood<br />
Other<br />
37.6<br />
12.2<br />
42.5<br />
7.5<br />
27.3<br />
14.1<br />
49.3<br />
9.1<br />
68.4<br />
6.5<br />
22.3<br />
2.7<br />
Type of house<br />
Kachcha<br />
Semi - pucca<br />
Pucca<br />
16.0<br />
50.6<br />
33.2<br />
18.8<br />
57.2<br />
23.7<br />
7.8<br />
30.8<br />
61.4<br />
<strong>Household</strong> assets<br />
Fan<br />
Radio/transistor<br />
Sewing machine<br />
Television<br />
Telephone<br />
Bicycle<br />
Motor cycle/ scooter<br />
Car / Jeep<br />
Tractor<br />
60.5<br />
79.7<br />
34.7<br />
62.3<br />
13.7<br />
14.9<br />
10.6<br />
3.3<br />
1.4<br />
52.5<br />
79.1<br />
28.1<br />
54.7<br />
7.5<br />
14.2<br />
6.4<br />
2.3<br />
1.2<br />
84.5<br />
81.6<br />
54.8<br />
85.3<br />
32.5<br />
16.8<br />
23.0<br />
6.3<br />
2.1<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
20.6<br />
51.7<br />
27.7<br />
26.3<br />
56.4<br />
17.3<br />
3.5<br />
37.7<br />
58.8<br />
Number of households<br />
15,088<br />
11,310<br />
3,777<br />
Source of drinking water: 3 for Tap (own), 2 for Tap (shared), 1 for hand pump and well, and 0<br />
for other;<br />
Type of house: 4 for pucca, 2 for semi-pucca, and 0 for kachcha;<br />
Source of lighting: 2 for electricity, 1 for kerosene, and 0 for other;<br />
Fuel for cooking: 2 for LPG gas/electricity, 1 for kerosene and 0 for other;<br />
Toilet facility: 4 for own flush toilet, 2 for own pit toilet, 2 for shared toilet and 0 for no toilet;<br />
22
Ownership for items: 4 each for car and tractor, 3 each for television, telephone and<br />
motorcycle/scooter, and 2 each for fan, radio/transistor, sewing machine and bicycle.<br />
The total of the scores may vary from the lowest of a 0 to maximum of 40. On the basis of total<br />
score, households are divided into three categories as;<br />
a) Low – if total score is less than or equal to 9,<br />
b) Medium – if total score is greater than 9 but less than or equal to 19 and<br />
c) High – if total score is greater than 19.<br />
The percentage of households with low standard of living index was 21 percent, 52<br />
percent households were with medium standard of living index and 28 percent of the households<br />
were with high standard of living index. The percentage of households with high SLI was 59<br />
percent in urban areas, while percentage of households with medium SLI 56 percent in rural<br />
areas.<br />
2.9 Housing Characteristics by <strong>District</strong>s<br />
Table 2.9 gives selected housing characteristics by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The<br />
percentage of household with electricity was the highest (99.9 percent) in Baramula district,<br />
followed by over 97 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (10 percent) in Poonch district,<br />
while it was 80 percent for the state.<br />
The percentage of household with drinking water facility was the highest (100 percent) in<br />
Baramula district, followed by 98 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (18 percent) in<br />
Poonch district, while it was 82 percent for the state. The percentage of households with toilet<br />
facility was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 99.8 percent in Leh<br />
district and the lowest (18 percent) in Kathua district, while it was 79 percent for the state.<br />
Table 2.9 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS BY DISTRICT<br />
Selected housing characteristics by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
With<br />
electricity<br />
With<br />
drinking<br />
water 1<br />
Percentage of households:<br />
With toilet<br />
facility<br />
Using Liquid<br />
petroleum<br />
gas/<br />
electricity<br />
Living in<br />
pucca<br />
house<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
57.7<br />
91.5<br />
99.9<br />
19.5<br />
97.4<br />
78.4<br />
89.4<br />
100.0<br />
78.0<br />
98.0<br />
87.9<br />
99.0<br />
100.0<br />
98.2<br />
66.1<br />
27.5<br />
34.1<br />
8.8<br />
22.9<br />
73.0<br />
20.6<br />
24.1<br />
7.3<br />
10.2<br />
72.0<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
73.9<br />
96.6<br />
95.1<br />
96.7<br />
95.9<br />
61.9<br />
82.3<br />
87.3<br />
64.4<br />
91.5<br />
98.7<br />
18.3<br />
90.6<br />
99.8<br />
93.2<br />
21.7<br />
23.8<br />
22.4<br />
93.2<br />
20.3<br />
7.3<br />
56.2<br />
19.0<br />
11.7<br />
16.7<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
10.1<br />
49.4<br />
89.8<br />
91.5<br />
18.2<br />
57.6<br />
85.7<br />
59.8<br />
81.9<br />
52.0<br />
86.4<br />
39.1<br />
6.4<br />
31.8<br />
64.6<br />
36.2<br />
31.5<br />
24.0<br />
34.1<br />
33.6<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
80.4<br />
82.3<br />
78.7<br />
37.6<br />
33.2<br />
1<br />
That is piped or from a hand pump/bore well/ covered well<br />
23
The percentage of households using liquid petroleum gas/electricity for cooking was the<br />
highest (93 percent) in Leh district, followed by 73 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (six<br />
percent) in Poonch district, while it was 38 percent for the state. The percentage of households<br />
living in pucca houses was the highest (72 percent) in Jammu district, followed by 56 percent in<br />
Kathua district and the lowest (seven percent) in Baramula and Kargil districts, while it was 33<br />
percent for the state.<br />
2.10 Iodization of Salt<br />
Consumption of salt fortified with iodine is recommended to avoid miscarriages, brain disorders,<br />
cretinism and retarded psychomotor development. As per the Prevention of Food Adulteration<br />
Act, 1988, the minimum iodine content of edible salt is 30 parts per million (PPM) at the<br />
manufacturing level.<br />
In the DLHS-RCH survey, each interviewer was provided with a test kit to measure the<br />
level of iodine content of salt consumed by the surveyed households. The test results (Table 2.10)<br />
are classified by degree of ionization of salt and categorised by selected background<br />
characteristics. It is observed that only 45 percent of households used salt that contained a minimum<br />
Table 2.10 IODIZATION OF SALT<br />
Percent distribution of household heads by degree of Iodization of salt, according to selected background characteristics,<br />
Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Not<br />
Total<br />
Iodised 7ppm 15+ppm Other 1 percent<br />
Number of<br />
households<br />
Place of Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
8.1<br />
1.1<br />
53.3<br />
31.9<br />
37.9<br />
66.5<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
11,310<br />
3,777<br />
Education of the household heads<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
9.6<br />
5.0<br />
2.1<br />
49.8<br />
47.2<br />
45.5<br />
40.0<br />
46.9<br />
51.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.9<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
7,363<br />
3,031<br />
4,690<br />
Religion of household head<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
0.7<br />
9.5<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
46.0<br />
50.3<br />
35.4<br />
2.5<br />
50.7<br />
51.4<br />
40.1<br />
63.3<br />
97.5<br />
47.5<br />
1.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.0<br />
1.8<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
4,879<br />
9,601<br />
365<br />
177<br />
66<br />
Caste/tribe of the household head#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
2.2<br />
0.3<br />
7.8<br />
8.0<br />
51.0<br />
78.7<br />
58.2<br />
36.2<br />
44.5<br />
21.0<br />
33.7<br />
55.1<br />
2.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.4<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,551<br />
1,808<br />
2,657<br />
8,710<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
11.4<br />
7.2<br />
0.9<br />
67.1<br />
44.4<br />
40.5<br />
20.7<br />
47.7<br />
57.9<br />
0.7<br />
0.7<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
3,103<br />
7,805<br />
4,180<br />
Total<br />
6.3<br />
47.9<br />
45.0<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
15,088<br />
Note: Table includes 2 household heads with missing information on education and 22 on religion who are not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate persons with no years of schooling are also included. # Total number of cases may not add upto N due to do not know<br />
and missing cases. 1 Includes salt not at home, salt not tested, refused and missing cases.<br />
Ppm: Parts per million.<br />
24
ecommended 15 ppm or higher level of iodine content and over six percent of households used<br />
salt that is not iodized at all, while 48 percent used salt, which was inadequately iodized.<br />
The percentage of households using non-iodized salt was over six percent in the state –<br />
eight percent in rural areas and over one percent in urban areas. The percentage of households<br />
using non-iodized salt was the highest (10 percent) for non-literate household heads and the<br />
lowest (two percent) for household heads who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was<br />
five percent for household heads who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of<br />
households using non-iodized salt was the highest (over 11 percent) for households with low SLI<br />
and the lowest (one percent) for households with high SLI, while it was seven percent for<br />
households with medium SLI. More of Muslim (over nine percent) than Hindu (one percent)<br />
households were using non-iodized salt. Again, more of OBC and other caste (eight percent each)<br />
households were using non-iodized salt than SC/ST (around two percent) households.<br />
Over 53 percent of the households in rural areas and 32 percent of the households in<br />
urban areas were using inadequately iodised salt, while it was 48 percent for the state. The<br />
percentage of households using inadequately iodized salt was over 50 percent for Muslims households<br />
and those belonging to other religions, 46 percent for Hindus and 35 percent for Sikh<br />
households, while it was over two percent for Buddhist households. The percentage of households<br />
using inadequately iodized salt was the highest (79 percent) for scheduled tribe households,<br />
followed by 58 percent for OBC households and the lowest (36 percent) for other caste<br />
households. Further, percentage of the households using inadequately iodized salt was the<br />
highest (50 percent) for non-literate household heads and the lowest (45 percent) for household<br />
heads who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 47 percent for household heads who<br />
had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of the households using inadequately iodized salt<br />
was the highest (67 percent) for households with low SLI and the lowest (40 percent) for<br />
households with high SLI, while it was 44 percent for households with medium SLI.<br />
Over 66 percent of the households in urban areas as against 38 percent in rural areas were<br />
using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents, while it was 45 percent for the state. The<br />
percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest<br />
(97 percent) for Buddhist households, followed by 63 percent for Sikh households and the lowest<br />
(40 percent) for Muslim households, while it was 51 percent for Hindu households. The percentage<br />
of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest (55 percent)<br />
for other castes households, followed by 44 percent for scheduled caste households and the lowest<br />
(21 percent) for scheduled tribe households, while it was 34 percent for OBC households.<br />
The percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents<br />
was the highest (52 percent) for household heads who had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />
lowest (40 percent) for non-literate household heads, while it was 47 percent for household heads<br />
who had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of households using cooking salt with 15 ppm or<br />
higher iodine contents was the highest (58 percent) for household with high SLI and the lowest (21<br />
percent) for households with low SLI, while it was 48 percent for households with medium SLI<br />
2.11 Iodization of Salt by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 2.11 gives percent distribution of household heads by degree of iodization of salt by district<br />
25
Table 2.11 IDOIZATION OF SALT BY DISTRICT<br />
Percent distribution of household heads by degree of idoization of salt by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> Not idoized 7ppm 15+ppm Other 1<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
11.8<br />
12.3<br />
6.3<br />
0.0<br />
1.1<br />
51.4<br />
27.1<br />
10.0<br />
100.0<br />
26.4<br />
36.8<br />
60.3<br />
83.7<br />
0.0<br />
71.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.3<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
1.7<br />
1.1<br />
21.3<br />
0.0<br />
20.1<br />
20.5<br />
49.3<br />
19.4<br />
0.7<br />
19.6<br />
77.4<br />
41.8<br />
59.2<br />
99.3<br />
60.1<br />
0.4<br />
7.8<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
96.1<br />
97.7<br />
94.3<br />
74.6<br />
3.9<br />
1.5<br />
5.6<br />
25.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
6.3<br />
47.9<br />
45.0<br />
0.7<br />
Note: Ppm: Parts per million. 1 Includes salt not at home, salt not tested, refused and missing cases<br />
in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of households using non-iodized salt was the highest<br />
(21 percent) in Kupwara district, followed by 20 percent in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Doda, Leh, Poonch. Rajouri, Srinagar and Udhampur districts, while it was over six<br />
percent for the state. The percentage of households using inadequately iodized salt was the<br />
highest (100 percent) in Doda district, followed by 98 percent in Rajouri district and the lowest<br />
(one percent) in Leh district, while it was 48 percent for the state. Further, percentage of the<br />
households using iodized salt with 15 ppm or higher iodine contents was the highest (99 percent)<br />
in Leh district, followed by 84 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />
district, while it was 45 percent for the state (see Map-2).<br />
2.12 Availability of Facility and Services to the <strong>Rural</strong> Population<br />
The DLHS-RCH collected information about surveyed village from knowledgeable persons such<br />
as, the ‘Sarpanch’ or ‘Pradhan’, (village head) or other village officials or other persons including<br />
‘teacher’ in the villages on health and educational facilities and other services available in the village.<br />
One important aspect was to know the distance of the village, if facility is not available within<br />
the village, covering various types of education facilities, including primary school, middle school,<br />
secondary school, higher secondary school, college, Gurujee scheme and ‘Madarsa’. Similarly<br />
information on the distance of the village, if health facility not available within the village, covering<br />
various types of health facility, including sub-centres, primary health centres (PHCs), community<br />
health centres/ <strong>Rural</strong> Hospitals (CHCs/RHs), Government dispensary, hospital, private clinic or<br />
hospitals and health facilities of Indian System of Medicine (ISM).<br />
Table 2.12 gives percent distribution of household population by distance from the<br />
nearest education facility in Jammu & Kashmir State. The data shows that 90 percent of the<br />
primary schools were situated within the village and 10 percent outside the village. Sixty-six<br />
percent of the middle schools were situated within the village and 23 percent outside the village<br />
but within five kms. of the village and the remaining beyond five kms. from the village. Twenty-eight<br />
percent of the secondary schools were situated within the village, 40 percent outside the village<br />
26
Table 2.12 DISTANCE FROM THE NEAREST EDUCATION FACILITY<br />
Percent distribution of rural household population by distance from the nearest education facility, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Distance from the village:<br />
Education facility<br />
Within<br />
village<br />
< 5 km 5-9 km 10+ km<br />
Don’t know/<br />
missing<br />
Total<br />
percent<br />
Primary School<br />
Middle School<br />
Secondary School<br />
Higher Secondary School<br />
College<br />
Gurujee Scheme<br />
Madarsa<br />
89.8<br />
65.9<br />
27.7<br />
15.1<br />
0.1<br />
1.0<br />
40.3<br />
6.2<br />
23.3<br />
40.3<br />
33.3<br />
6.2<br />
8.5<br />
9.3<br />
1.4<br />
3.3<br />
15.8<br />
28.2<br />
17.1<br />
4.9<br />
2.2<br />
0.0<br />
1.4<br />
7.4<br />
16.8<br />
68.8<br />
28.2<br />
12.1<br />
2.6<br />
6.1<br />
8.9<br />
6.5<br />
7.9<br />
57.5<br />
36.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />
but within five kms. of the village and 16 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while the remaining<br />
schools were situated 10 or more kms. from the village. Only 15 percent of the higher secondary<br />
schools were situated with the village, 33 percent outside the village but within five kms. of the<br />
village, 28 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village the remaining higher secondary schools were<br />
located 10 or more kms. of the village. Only over six percent of the colleges were located within<br />
five kms. of the village and 17 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while 69 percent of the colleges<br />
were locate 10 or more kms. of the village. Forty percent of the Madarassas were located within<br />
the village and the remaining outside the village.<br />
Table 2.13 gives percent distribution rural households population by distance from the<br />
nearest health facility in the state. Forty-eight percent of Sub-centres were located within the<br />
village and 24 percent outside the village but within five kms. of the village, while the remaining<br />
Sub-centres were located beyond five kms. of the village. More than one-third (35 percent) of<br />
the primary health centre were located within the village, 27 percent outside the village but within<br />
five kms. of the village and 21 percent within 5-9 kms. of the village, while the remaining PHCs<br />
were located 10 or more kms. of the village. More than one-half (58 percent) of the Sub- centre<br />
or PHC were located within the village and 23 percent outside the village but within five kms. of<br />
the village, while the remaining Sub-centres or PHC were locate beyond five kms. of the village.<br />
Forty percent of the Community health centre/Referral hospitals were located within five kms. of<br />
the village and the remaining beyond five kms. of the village. Fifty percent of the Government<br />
Table 2.13 DISTANCE FROM THE NEAERST HEALTH FACILITY<br />
Percent distribution of rural household population by distance from the nearest health facility, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Distance from the village:<br />
<strong>Health</strong> facility<br />
Within<br />
village<br />
< 5 km 5-9 km 10+ km<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> household population<br />
Don’t know/<br />
missing<br />
Total percent<br />
Sub-centre<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Either sub-centre or PHC<br />
Community health centre/<br />
Referral hospital<br />
Government dispensary<br />
Government hospital<br />
Private clinic<br />
Private hospital<br />
ISM health facility<br />
48.1<br />
35.4<br />
58.2<br />
14.3<br />
48.6<br />
6.2<br />
29.4<br />
15.0<br />
3.3<br />
24.1<br />
27.4<br />
22.7<br />
25.9<br />
28.5<br />
18.4<br />
17.9<br />
5.0<br />
9.6<br />
14.9<br />
20.7<br />
12.1<br />
20.4<br />
9.7<br />
24.1<br />
12.6<br />
15.8<br />
20.1<br />
8.2<br />
10.8<br />
3.3<br />
25.9<br />
6.7<br />
44.0<br />
27.8<br />
44.5<br />
32.7<br />
4.7<br />
5.7<br />
3.8<br />
13.6<br />
6.5<br />
7.2<br />
12.3<br />
19.7<br />
34.3<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />
27
dispensaries were located within the village and over 28 percent outside the village but within<br />
five kms. of the village, while the remaining dispensaries were located beyond five kms. from<br />
the village. One-fourth of the Government hospitals were located within five kms. of the village<br />
and the remaining beyond five kms. from the village. Twenty-nine percent of the private clinics<br />
and 15 percent of the private hospitals were located within the village. Thirteen percent of the<br />
ISM facilities were located within five kms. of the village and 33 percent were located 10 or more<br />
kms, from the village.<br />
Table 2.14 gives percentage of rural residents living in villages that have selected<br />
services in Jammu & Kashmir State. Over 85 percent of the rural residents were living in villages<br />
that have an anganwadi centres (a nursery school for children age 3-6 years) and 51 percent of<br />
the rural residents living in villages having anganwadi workers (Anganwadi workers provide integrated<br />
child development services) in the village.<br />
Less than one-fourth (over 22 percent) of the rural residents live in villages that have a<br />
private doctor, 13 percent live in villages with a visiting doctor, two percent with a homeopathy<br />
doctor, 10 percent with a village health guide, 42 percent with a trained birth attendant and 12<br />
percent with a traditional healer. More than one-half (55 percent) of the rural residents live in<br />
villages that have a Dai (Dai provides the services for the delivery).<br />
Table 2.14 AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES<br />
Percentage of rural residents living in villages that have selected services, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Services<br />
Percentage of rural Residents<br />
Anganwadi centre<br />
Anganwadi worker<br />
Private doctor<br />
Visiting doctor<br />
Homeopathic doctor<br />
Village health guide<br />
Trained birth attendant<br />
Traditional healer<br />
Dai<br />
84.5<br />
50.6<br />
22.5<br />
13.0<br />
2.0<br />
9.8<br />
42.0<br />
12.0<br />
55.0<br />
Note: Table based on rural de jure population<br />
2.13 Availability of Education Facility and <strong>Health</strong> Services by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 2.15 gives selected facility and services of rural household population within village by district<br />
in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of the rural household population with primary or<br />
middle school within the village was the highest (100 percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kargil,<br />
Kathua, Kupwara, Leh and Pulwama districts and the lowest (71 percent) in Doda district, while<br />
it was 94 percent for the state. The percentage of rural household population having Sub-centre<br />
within the village was the highest (100 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 95 percent in<br />
Udhampur district and the lowest (16 percent) in Baramula district, while it was 48 percent for<br />
the state. The percentage of rural household population having PHC within the village was the<br />
highest (100 percent) in Leh district, followed by 74 percent in Kargil and Srinagar districs and<br />
the lowest (six percent) in Baramula district, while it was 35 percent for the state. Further, percentage<br />
of rural household population having any government health facility within the village was the<br />
highest (100 percent) in Kargil, Leh and Udhampur districts, followed by 91 percent in Anantnag<br />
district and the lowest (41 percent) in Rajouri district, while it was 75 percent for the state.<br />
28
Table 2.15 AVAILABILITY OF FACILITY AND SERVICES BY DISTRICT<br />
Selected facility and services of rural household population within village by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Primary or<br />
middle school Sub-centre PHCs<br />
Percentage of rural household population with:<br />
Any government<br />
Anganwadi<br />
health facility 1 Doctor 2 TBA 3 worker<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
93.3<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
70.7<br />
92.0<br />
24.2<br />
38.4<br />
16.4<br />
34.4<br />
46.3<br />
54.6<br />
44.6<br />
5.7<br />
7.5<br />
25.7<br />
91.3<br />
82.8<br />
75.6<br />
45.7<br />
66.8<br />
26.3<br />
68.0<br />
22.6<br />
0.0<br />
21.8<br />
11.5<br />
62.1<br />
53.0<br />
0.0<br />
49.2<br />
79.8<br />
69.0<br />
76.8<br />
2.6<br />
54.9<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
64.5<br />
46.2<br />
71.3<br />
52.0<br />
73.9<br />
32.6<br />
9.2<br />
100.0<br />
12.4<br />
100.0<br />
84.3<br />
60.5<br />
100.0<br />
67.7<br />
65.6<br />
61.8<br />
22.9<br />
97.9<br />
29.8<br />
48.5<br />
89.5<br />
25.3<br />
26.6<br />
29.5<br />
77.9<br />
16.5<br />
73.8<br />
56.4<br />
93.5<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
99.9<br />
99.1<br />
88.1<br />
78.3<br />
44.7<br />
41.0<br />
76.5<br />
95.2<br />
31.6<br />
25.8<br />
73.7<br />
56.5<br />
63.0<br />
41.0<br />
80.6<br />
100.0<br />
6.8<br />
61.4<br />
9.2<br />
2.4<br />
2.8<br />
81.1<br />
31.6<br />
100.0<br />
0.0<br />
92.8<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
93.6<br />
48.1<br />
35.4<br />
74.9<br />
27.3<br />
42.0<br />
50.6<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-center, primary health center, community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village 2 Either private or visiting doctor 3 Trained birth attendant<br />
The percentage of the rural household population having been visited either by private or<br />
by visiting doctors was the highest (98 percent) in Leh district, followed by 68 percent in Badgam<br />
district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district, while it was 27 percent for the state. The<br />
percentage of the rural household population having TBA within the village was the highest (100<br />
percent) in Udhampur district, followed by 89 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Doda district, while it was 42 percent for the state. The percentage of the rural<br />
household population having Anganwadi worker within the village was the highest (93 percent) in<br />
Pulwama and Rajouri districts, followed by 80 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Poonch. Srinagar and Udhampur districts, while it was 51 percent in the state.<br />
29
Map – 1<br />
Percent Girl Marrying Below Legal Age at Marriage<br />
30
Map-2<br />
Percentage of <strong>Household</strong>s Using Salt that Contains 15ppm <strong>Level</strong> of Iodine<br />
31
CHAPTER III<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN, HUSBANDS AND FERTILITY<br />
The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme is targeted towards the underprivileged<br />
section of the population, particularly, women and children. The utilization of RCH services provided<br />
across the country depends to a large extent on the characteristics of women, their husbands and<br />
episodes of pregnancies, miscarriages, abortions, number of children born to them and survival<br />
status of children. Age of women, marital duration, educational attainment, social background and<br />
living standard are important factors, which influence reproductive and child health. With this in<br />
view, the DLHS-RCH data were collected on demographic characteristics, such as current age,<br />
age at consummation of marriage and number of pregnancies, live births and surviving children<br />
from eligible women respondents of selected representative households. Information regarding<br />
household background characteristics was collected using a separate household questionnaire<br />
that covered religion and caste of head of household, type of house, source of drinking water and<br />
possession of consumer durables. Fertility preference of women in terms of timing and desire for<br />
additional children in comparison to the number of living children provides information on the<br />
need for reproductive and child health services.<br />
This chapter provides a comprehensive outline of distribution of currently married women<br />
by present age, age at consummation of marriage, duration of marriage, complete years of schooling,<br />
pregnancy episodes, children ever born and children surviving, along with social and economic<br />
characteristics of households the women represent.<br />
3.1 Background Characteristics of Women<br />
Table 3.1 gives percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 years by selected<br />
background characteristics, according to residence in Jammu & Kashmir State. About 58 percent<br />
of the currently married women were in the age group 20-34 years and a similar age distribution is<br />
observed both for urban and rural areas. Forty-two percent women were aged 35 years and<br />
above, while less than one percent women were aged below 20 years. Over 15 percent of women<br />
consummated their marriage before reaching 18 years as against 85 percent of the women who<br />
consummated their marriage at the age of 18 years and above in the state. Further, 12 percent of the<br />
women in urban areas as against 16 percent of the women in rural areas started cohabiting before 18<br />
years of age. Over 15 percent of the women were married for less than five years duration, 24<br />
percent for each 5-9 years and 10-14 years, and 37 percent for 15 years or more of duration.<br />
The distribution of the women by religion shows that 61 percent were Muslim as against<br />
35 percent Hindu and three Sikh, while the remaining over one percent women were from other<br />
religious groups. More of Hindu women are found in urban areas (57 percent) and more of Muslim<br />
women in rural areas (69 percent). Over 41 percent of the women belong to scheduled castes (11<br />
percent), scheduled tribes (13 percent) and other backward classes (17 percent) and 57 percent<br />
women were from other castes, while about two percent of the women who said ‘don’t know’<br />
were not sure about their caste. Sixty percent of women as against 34 percent of husbands were<br />
non-literate in the state. Similarly, 22 percent of women as against 36 percent of husbands had<br />
studied for 10 years and above in the state. These data have shown that there exists rural-urban<br />
differential in female literacy and that husbands are educationally better placed than their wives.
Table 3.1 BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF ELIGIBLE WOMEN<br />
Percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 by selected background characteristics, according to residence,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Age group<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
Age at consummation of marriage<br />
Below 18 years<br />
18 years & above<br />
Marital duration<br />
0-4<br />
5-9<br />
10-14<br />
15+<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Christian<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Caste/tribe<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other #<br />
Don’t know<br />
Education (Years of schooling)<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
Missing<br />
Husband’s education (Years of schooling)<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
Don’t know<br />
Missing<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
0.6<br />
8.1<br />
23.7<br />
25.8<br />
26.5<br />
15.4<br />
15.3<br />
84.7<br />
15.3<br />
23.9<br />
23.8<br />
37.0<br />
34.9<br />
61.1<br />
0.3<br />
2.6<br />
1.1<br />
11.2<br />
13.2<br />
17.1<br />
56.8<br />
1.6<br />
60.2<br />
17.8<br />
22.1<br />
0.0<br />
34.1<br />
19.2<br />
36.2<br />
10.3<br />
0.1<br />
20.9<br />
51.3<br />
27.8<br />
0.7<br />
8.3<br />
23.3<br />
25.8<br />
26.3<br />
15.5<br />
16.3<br />
83.7<br />
14.8<br />
23.9<br />
23.8<br />
37.6<br />
27.9<br />
69.0<br />
0.2<br />
1.8<br />
1.1<br />
10.9<br />
15.6<br />
19.3<br />
52.0<br />
2.1<br />
68.7<br />
17.1<br />
14.2<br />
0.0<br />
39.0<br />
19.4<br />
30.0<br />
11.5<br />
0.2<br />
26.4<br />
56.5<br />
17.1<br />
0.3<br />
7.4<br />
24.9<br />
25.7<br />
26.9<br />
14.8<br />
12.0<br />
88.0<br />
17.0<br />
24.0<br />
24.0<br />
35.0<br />
57.3<br />
35.9<br />
0.5<br />
5.0<br />
1.3<br />
12.2<br />
5.7<br />
10.0<br />
72.1<br />
0.0<br />
33.0<br />
19.8<br />
47.2<br />
0.0<br />
18.7<br />
18.4<br />
56.2<br />
6.7<br />
0.1<br />
3.4<br />
34.6<br />
62.0<br />
Number of women<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
# Not belonging to a scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward class.<br />
@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are included.<br />
The distribution of according to their standard of living index (SLI) shows that 21 percent<br />
women were with low SLI and 51 percent with medium SLI, while 28 percent women were with<br />
high SLI. The percentage of women was the highest in urban areas with high SLI and with medium<br />
SLI in rural areas.<br />
3.2 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Women<br />
Table 3.2 gives percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 years by years of<br />
schooling, according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage<br />
34
Table 3.2 LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF ELIGIBLE WOMEN<br />
Percent distribution of currently married women aged 15-44 by years of schooling, according to selected background<br />
characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Years of schooling<br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Nonliterate<br />
Literate<br />
but no<br />
schooling<br />
1-5<br />
years<br />
6-8<br />
years<br />
9-10<br />
years<br />
11 or<br />
more<br />
years<br />
Missing<br />
Total<br />
percent<br />
Number<br />
of women<br />
Age group<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
56.4<br />
47.9<br />
52.3<br />
57.8<br />
67.8<br />
69.9<br />
1.6<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
11.4<br />
8.5<br />
4.6<br />
6.0<br />
5.2<br />
7.4<br />
10.8<br />
13.3<br />
10.9<br />
9.1<br />
7.3<br />
6.1<br />
15.6<br />
20.6<br />
17.1<br />
14.2<br />
10.5<br />
8.3<br />
4.2<br />
9.3<br />
15.1<br />
12.8<br />
9.2<br />
8.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
Place of residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
68.7<br />
33.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
5.8<br />
6.2<br />
8.4<br />
10.5<br />
10.7<br />
22.5<br />
6.2<br />
27.8<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
32.0<br />
77.9<br />
15.5<br />
70.2<br />
(61.5)<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
(0.0)<br />
11.1<br />
2.9<br />
7.7<br />
0.7<br />
(7.7)<br />
15.3<br />
5.0<br />
18.5<br />
2.5<br />
(5.1)<br />
21.5<br />
8.2<br />
29.4<br />
15.2<br />
(17.9)<br />
19.9<br />
5.7<br />
28.9<br />
11.0<br />
(7.7)<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
(0.0)<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
(100.0)<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
53.3<br />
78.9<br />
71.6<br />
53.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.7<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
10.4<br />
2.8<br />
4.3<br />
6.2<br />
11.6<br />
3.7<br />
7.8<br />
10.0<br />
13.4<br />
7.9<br />
10.5<br />
15.9<br />
11.1<br />
5.9<br />
5.6<br />
14.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
Husband’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
1-5 years<br />
6-8 years<br />
9-10 years<br />
11 or more years<br />
96.1<br />
60.7<br />
48.9<br />
40.1<br />
19.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.2<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.2<br />
25.7<br />
18.7<br />
7.0<br />
1.4<br />
1.0<br />
6.1<br />
20.3<br />
19.6<br />
5.7<br />
1.1<br />
6.1<br />
9.0<br />
27.6<br />
26.8<br />
0.4<br />
1.1<br />
2.9<br />
5.7<br />
47.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
3,519<br />
366<br />
1,097<br />
2,337<br />
1,890<br />
Total<br />
60.2<br />
0.1<br />
5.9<br />
8.9<br />
13.5<br />
11.3<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
10,308<br />
# Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. Note 1: Table includes 1079 missing / do not know<br />
cases on husband’s education who were not shown separately. Note 2: Total includes 22 women with husbands who are literate<br />
but have no schooling were not shown separately.<br />
of non-literate women was the highest (70 percent) in the age group 40-44 years, followed by 68<br />
percent in the age group 35-39 years and the lowest (48 percent) in the age group 20-24 years,<br />
while it was 60 percent in the state. One third of the women in urban areas as against 69 percent<br />
in rural areas were non-literate – 36 percentage points rural-urban differential. The percentage of<br />
non-literate women was the highest (78 percent) for Muslims, followed by 70 percent for Buddhist<br />
and the lowest (15 percent) for Sikhs, while it was 32 percent for Hindus. Further, percentage of nonliterate<br />
women was the highest (79 percent) for scheduled tribe women, followed by 72 percent<br />
for OBC women and the lowest (53 percent) for scheduled caste and other castes women. Only<br />
six percent women had 1-5 years of schooling, nine percent women had 6-8 years of schooling, over<br />
13 percent women had 9-10 years of schooling, while 11 percent of women had schooling for 11 or<br />
more years.<br />
Further, 96 percent of the couples were non-literate and less than one percent of non-literate<br />
men have married women who had schooling for 11 or more years. Similarly, 19 percent of the<br />
men who had schooling for 11 or more years have married non-literate women. On the other hand,<br />
35
47 percent of the couples had studied for 11 or more years. Similarly, 28 percent of the couples had<br />
studied for 9-10 years. However, one-fifth of the couples had studied for 6-8 years and 26<br />
percent of the couples had studied for 1-5 years.<br />
3.3 Background Characteristics of Husbands of Eligible Women<br />
Husbands of eligible women were also interviewed in DLHS-RCH. The response rate for husbands<br />
is relatively low compared to that of eligible women. Table 3.3 gives percent distribution of husbands<br />
of eligible women by selected background characteristics and by residence in Jammu & Kashmir<br />
State. Eighty-six percent of the husbands were in the age group 25-44 years and 12 percent aged 45<br />
years and above, while two percent were below 25 years. Sixty-two percent of the husbands were<br />
Muslims, 33 percent Hindus and three percent Sikh, while about two percent were Christians and<br />
Buddhist. Further, percentage of husbands was the highest (57 percent) for other castes, followed<br />
Table 3.3 BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF MEN<br />
Percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by selected background characteristics, according to residence, Jammu &<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Age group<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45 +<br />
1.8<br />
34.7<br />
51.3<br />
12.2<br />
1.9<br />
35.1<br />
50.9<br />
12.1<br />
1.5<br />
33.2<br />
52.7<br />
12.6<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Christian<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
33.2<br />
62.2<br />
0.3<br />
2.9<br />
1.4<br />
25.9<br />
70.1<br />
0.2<br />
2.4<br />
1.3<br />
56.2<br />
36.8<br />
0.5<br />
4.6<br />
1.9<br />
Caste/tribe<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other #<br />
Don’t know<br />
10.5<br />
13.6<br />
17.0<br />
56.9<br />
2.0<br />
10.1<br />
15.7<br />
19.1<br />
52.4<br />
2.6<br />
11.8<br />
6.7<br />
10.0<br />
71.4<br />
0.0<br />
Education (Years of schooling)<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
Missing<br />
37.1<br />
22.0<br />
40.8<br />
0.2<br />
42.6<br />
22.4<br />
34.9<br />
0.1<br />
19.5<br />
20.8<br />
59.5<br />
0.2<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
20.7<br />
51.5<br />
27.8<br />
26.1<br />
56.4<br />
17.6<br />
3.4<br />
35.9<br />
60.6<br />
Number of living children<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
8.2<br />
15.3<br />
28.5<br />
27.0<br />
21.0<br />
8.1<br />
15.1<br />
26.5<br />
27.2<br />
23.2<br />
8.7<br />
16.1<br />
35.0<br />
26.2<br />
13.9<br />
Number of Men<br />
10,239<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
# Not belonging to a scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward class.<br />
@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are included.<br />
36
y 17 percent OBC and the lowest (10 percent) scheduled caste, while two percent of the<br />
husbands who said don’t know were not sure about their caste. The percentage of husbands was<br />
the highest (over 28 percent) for husbands with two living children, followed by 27 percent for<br />
husbands with three living children and the lowest (15 percent) for husbands with one living<br />
child, while husbands with no living children was eight percent.<br />
The percentage of non-literate husbands was 37 percent as against 41 percent who had<br />
studied for 10 years and above, while 22 percent of the husbands had studied for 0-9 years.<br />
Similarly, 21 percent of the husbands were with low SLI as against 28 percent of the husbands with<br />
high SLI, while over 51 percent of the husbands were with medium SLI. These data have shown that<br />
the proportion of husbands who had studied for 10 years and above was highest (59 percent) in<br />
urban areas and proportion of non-literate husbands was highest (43 percent) in rural areas. Similarly,<br />
proportion of husbands with high SLI was the highest in urban areas and the proportion of husbands<br />
with low and medium SLI was the highest in rural areas.<br />
3.4 Educational <strong>Level</strong> of Husbands of Eligible Women<br />
Table 3.4 gives percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by years of schooling and<br />
selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Forty-three percent of the husbands<br />
in rural areas as against over 19 percent of the husbands in urban areas were non-literate, while it<br />
was 37 percent in the state. The percentage of non-literate husband was 31 percent in the age<br />
group below 25 years, 34 percent in the age group 25-34 years and around 39 percent in the age<br />
Table 3.4 LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF MEN<br />
Percent distribution of husbands of eligible women by years of schooling, according to selected background characteristics,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Nonliterate<br />
Literate<br />
but no<br />
schooling<br />
1-5<br />
years<br />
Years of schooling<br />
6-8<br />
years<br />
9-10<br />
years<br />
11 or<br />
more<br />
years<br />
Missing<br />
Total<br />
percent<br />
Number of<br />
men<br />
Age group<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45 +<br />
30.7<br />
33.9<br />
38.8<br />
39.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
4.8<br />
4.0<br />
4.5<br />
5.0<br />
13.7<br />
12.4<br />
12.0<br />
9.5<br />
25.4<br />
26.3<br />
26.0<br />
28.0<br />
24.4<br />
23.1<br />
18.5<br />
17.7<br />
0.9<br />
0.3<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
181<br />
3,549<br />
5,257<br />
1,251<br />
Place of residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
42.6<br />
19.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
4.4<br />
4.1<br />
11.9<br />
11.8<br />
25.6<br />
28.6<br />
15.2<br />
35.7<br />
0.1<br />
0.2<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
17.9<br />
48.5<br />
16.1<br />
27.6<br />
(39.5)<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
6.8<br />
3.2<br />
3.5<br />
1.7<br />
(2.6)<br />
17.2<br />
9.5<br />
7.4<br />
2.7<br />
(7.9)<br />
32.1<br />
22.3<br />
40.3<br />
37.6<br />
(34.2)<br />
25.7<br />
16.3<br />
32.7<br />
30.4<br />
(15.8)<br />
0.3<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
(100.0)<br />
3,394<br />
6,367<br />
301<br />
146<br />
30<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
35.1<br />
51.4<br />
47.1<br />
31.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
6.9<br />
3.6<br />
3.9<br />
4.3<br />
16.3<br />
8.1<br />
10.3<br />
12.5<br />
22.5<br />
21.7<br />
21.4<br />
29.2<br />
18.7<br />
14.4<br />
17.2<br />
22.9<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,075<br />
1,391<br />
1,736<br />
5,830<br />
Total<br />
37.1<br />
0.1<br />
4.4<br />
11.9<br />
26.3<br />
20.1<br />
0.2<br />
100.0<br />
10,239<br />
# Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. ( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
37
group 35 years and above. The percentage of non-literate husband was the highest (48 percent)<br />
among Muslims, followed by 39 percent among other religious groups and the lowest (16 percent)<br />
among Sikhs, while it was 28 percent for Buddhists. Again, percentage of non-literate husband was<br />
the highest (51 percent) among scheduled caste, followed by 47 percent among OBC and the lowest<br />
(31 percent) among other castes, while it was 35 percent among scheduled castes. Over four<br />
percent of husbands had studied for 1-5 years, 12 percent for 6-8 years and 26 percent for 9-10<br />
years, while 20 percent husbands had studied for 11 or more years of schooling.<br />
The percentage of husband who had studied for 11 or more years was 20 percent in the state-<br />
15 percent in rural areas and 36 percent in urban areas. The percentage of husband who had studied<br />
for 11 or more years was around 23 percent among husbands aged upto 35 years and around 18 percent<br />
among husbands aged 35 years and above. Again, percentage of husband who had studied for 11<br />
or more years was the highest (33 percent) among Sikhs, followed by 30 percent among Buddhist<br />
and the lowest (16 percent) among Muslims and others. The percentage of husband who had studied<br />
for 11 or more years was the highest (23 percent) among other castes, followed by 19 percent<br />
among scheduled caste and the lowest (14 percent) among scheduled tribe.<br />
3.5 Children Ever Born and Surviving<br />
Table 3.5 gives mean children ever born and children surviving by selected background<br />
characteristics of currently married women age 15-44 years in Jammu & Kashmir State. On the<br />
average a woman in the reproductive age group have given birth to 2.5 children – 1.3 male children<br />
and 1.1 female children. The mean children ever born to women were 2.5 children in the state – 2.5<br />
children in rural areas and 2.3 children in urban areas. Further, mean children ever born to women<br />
in the age group 40-44 years was 3.4 in the state, which is close to her completed fertility. On the<br />
average a woman gives birth to 3.4 children comprising of 1.9 male children and 1.5 female<br />
children during her reproductive span of 15 years. Out of the 3.4 mean children ever born to women<br />
in the age group 40-44 years an average of 3.3 children survived.<br />
The data shows that mean children ever born increases with increase in the marital duration.<br />
Mean children ever born was about one child for 0-4 years duration, 1.9 children for 5-9 years<br />
duration and 2.8 children for 10-14 years duration, while it was 3.4 children for 15 or more years<br />
of marital duration. The addition of 1.2 mean children ever born during the 5-9 years duration was<br />
the maximum, which decreases subsequently in each marital duration group.<br />
Mean children ever born to women was the highest (2.7 children) for Muslim women,<br />
followed by 2.5 children for Buddhist women and the lowest (1.8 children) for Sikh women,<br />
while it was 2.2 children for Hindu women. Mean surviving children remain unchanged. The<br />
average children ever born were the highest (2.6 children) for OBC women, followed by 2.5<br />
children for other caste women and the lowest (2.3 children) for scheduled caste and scheduled<br />
tribe women. The mean children ever born was the highest (2.8 children) for non-literate women<br />
and the lowest (1.8 children) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was<br />
2.2 children for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The mean children ever born were 2.6<br />
children for women with low and medium SLI and 2.1 children for women with high SLI.<br />
3.6 Completed Fertility by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 3.6 gives mean children ever born and children surviving of currently married women<br />
38
Table 3.5 CHILDREN EVER BORN AND LIVING<br />
Mean children ever born (CEB) and children surviving (CS) by selected background characteristics of currently married women<br />
aged 15-44 years, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Mean children ever born<br />
Mean children surviving<br />
Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Age group (years)<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
0.1<br />
0.9<br />
1.7<br />
2.5<br />
3.2<br />
3.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.9<br />
1.4<br />
1.7<br />
1.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.4<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
1.5<br />
1.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.9<br />
1.7<br />
2.5<br />
3.1<br />
3.3<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.9<br />
1.3<br />
1.7<br />
1.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.4<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
1.5<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
Marital duration<br />
0-4<br />
5-9<br />
10-14<br />
15+<br />
0.7<br />
1.9<br />
2.8<br />
3.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.8<br />
0.3<br />
0.8<br />
1.3<br />
1.6<br />
0.7<br />
1.9<br />
2.8<br />
3.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.8<br />
0.3<br />
0.8<br />
1.3<br />
1.5<br />
1,577<br />
2,464<br />
2,458<br />
3,810<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
2.5<br />
2.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
1.1<br />
2.5<br />
2.2<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
2.2<br />
2.7<br />
1.8<br />
2.5<br />
(3.0)<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
1.0<br />
1.3<br />
(1.9)<br />
0.9<br />
1.3<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
(1.1)<br />
2.2<br />
2.6<br />
1.8<br />
2.5<br />
(2.9)<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
1.0<br />
1.3<br />
(1.8)<br />
0.9<br />
1.2<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
(1.0)<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
2.3<br />
2.3<br />
2.6<br />
2.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.4<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
1.0<br />
1.1<br />
1.2<br />
2.3<br />
2.3<br />
2.6<br />
2.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.4<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
1.0<br />
1.1<br />
1.2<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
2.8<br />
2.2<br />
1.8<br />
1.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
2.8<br />
2.2<br />
1.8<br />
1.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
1.3<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
2.6<br />
2.6<br />
2.1<br />
1.4<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
0.9<br />
2.6<br />
2.6<br />
2.1<br />
1.4<br />
1.4<br />
1.1<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
0.9<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
All women<br />
2.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.1<br />
2.5<br />
1.3<br />
1.1<br />
10,308<br />
Note: # Total number may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases. Table includes 2 women with missing<br />
information on education who were not shown separately. @ Literate women with no year of schooling are included.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
aged 15-44 years by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. Mean children ever born was the highest<br />
(4.4 children) in Baramula district, followed by 3.9 children in Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama<br />
districts and the lowest (2.7 children) in Doda and Leh districts. Further, mean children ever born<br />
was equal to or higher than that of the state (3.4 children) in Anantnag, Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara,<br />
Rajouri and Udhampur districts and in the remaining seven districts it was lower than that of the<br />
state. In 10 out of 14 districts of the state mean children ever born were three or more children.<br />
Again, mean children ever born and surviving is similar in 10 districts and in the remaining four<br />
districts- Baramula, Kathua, Kupwara and Pulwama, difference is marginal, as the state average<br />
also changed marginally.<br />
39
Table 3.6 CHILDREN EVER BORN AND LIVING BY DISTRICT<br />
Mean children ever born (CEB) and children surviving (CS) by district of currently married women aged 15-44, Jammu &<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Mean children ever born<br />
Mean children surviving<br />
Total Male Female Total Male Female<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
3.7<br />
2.8<br />
4.4<br />
2.7<br />
2.8<br />
1.8<br />
1.8<br />
2.2<br />
1.8<br />
1.7<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
2.2<br />
0.9<br />
1.2<br />
3.7<br />
2.8<br />
4.3<br />
2.7<br />
2.8<br />
1.8<br />
1.8<br />
2.1<br />
1.8<br />
1.7<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
2.2<br />
0.9<br />
1.2<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
3.8<br />
3.9<br />
3.9<br />
2.7<br />
3.9<br />
1.9<br />
2.0<br />
1.9<br />
1.5<br />
1.9<br />
1.8<br />
1.9<br />
2.0<br />
1.2<br />
2.0<br />
3.8<br />
3.5<br />
3.8<br />
2.7<br />
3.7<br />
1.9<br />
1.9<br />
1.8<br />
1.5<br />
1.8<br />
1.8<br />
1.7<br />
1.9<br />
1.2<br />
1.9<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
3.1<br />
3.6<br />
3.0<br />
3.4<br />
1.9<br />
2.1<br />
1.8<br />
1.9<br />
1.3<br />
1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.5<br />
3.1<br />
3.6<br />
3.0<br />
3.4<br />
1.9<br />
2.1<br />
1.8<br />
1.9<br />
1.3<br />
1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.5<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
3.4<br />
1.9<br />
1.5<br />
3.3<br />
1.9<br />
1.5<br />
3.7 Birth Order<br />
Table 3.7 gives percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth<br />
order by selected background characteristics of women in Jammu & Kashmir State. This distribution<br />
can be used as a measure of fertility in the absence of formal measures of fertility, such as, crude<br />
birth rate and total fertility rate. The distribution of births by birth order shows that over 35 percent<br />
births were first order birth, 32 percent births of second order birth, 18 percent births third order<br />
birth and the remaining 14 percent births were fourth and higher order birth. In other words, onethird<br />
of the births was third and higher order birth in the state<br />
The percent of third and higher order birth was 32 percent in the state – 35 percent in<br />
rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. The percent of third and higher order birth was the<br />
highest (79 percent) for women aged 35-39 years, followed by over 49 percent for women in the<br />
age group 30-34 years and the lowest (five percent) in the age group 20-24 years, while it was 25<br />
percent in the age group 25-29 years. The percent of third and higher order birth was 21 percent<br />
for Hindu women as against 41 percent for Muslim women, while it was 13 percent for Sikh<br />
women. The percent of third and higher order birth was the highest (45 percent) for OBC women,<br />
followed by 37 percent for scheduled tribe women and the lowest (29 percent) for scheduled<br />
caste and other caste women. Again, percentage of third and higher order birth was the highest<br />
(45 percent) for non-literate women and the lowest (10 percent) for women who had studied for<br />
10 years and above, while it was 29 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The percent<br />
of third and higher order birth was the highest (38 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />
lowest (15 percent) for women with high SLI, while it was 37 percent for women with low SLI.<br />
Figure 3.1 gives Birth order three and above by selected background characteristics.<br />
3.8 Birth Order by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 3.8 gives percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order,<br />
according to district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The third and higher order birth were the highest<br />
40
Table 3.7 BIRTH ORDER<br />
Percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order by selected background characteristics,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Birth order<br />
1 2 3 4+<br />
Total<br />
percent<br />
Number of<br />
births<br />
Age of women<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
65.8<br />
39.0<br />
16.5<br />
3.0<br />
29.3<br />
36.1<br />
34.0<br />
18.3<br />
4.4<br />
19.7<br />
22.4<br />
26.2<br />
0.5<br />
5.2<br />
27.1<br />
52.5<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
465<br />
1,008<br />
596<br />
192<br />
Place of residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
33.2<br />
41.9<br />
31.5<br />
35.0<br />
18.7<br />
14.6<br />
16.6<br />
8.4<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,686<br />
598<br />
Education (Years of schooling)<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
26.8<br />
40.3<br />
48.1<br />
28.2<br />
30.4<br />
41.5<br />
21.6<br />
20.8<br />
8.3<br />
23.5<br />
8.5<br />
2.1<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
1,186<br />
449<br />
649<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
44.5<br />
28.7<br />
49.7<br />
35.0<br />
30.1<br />
37.6<br />
13.9<br />
20.3<br />
12.6<br />
6.7<br />
20.9<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
918<br />
1,281<br />
66<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
43.2<br />
28.5<br />
27.3<br />
35.9<br />
28.1<br />
34.5<br />
27.5<br />
34.7<br />
16.5<br />
21.3<br />
24.4<br />
16.1<br />
12.2<br />
15.6<br />
20.8<br />
13.3<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
323<br />
140<br />
370<br />
1,431<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
30.2<br />
30.8<br />
48.7<br />
32.3<br />
30.8<br />
35.7<br />
18.1<br />
20.4<br />
11.7<br />
19.4<br />
18.0<br />
3.8<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
427<br />
1,245<br />
612<br />
Total<br />
35.5<br />
32.4<br />
17.7<br />
14.4<br />
100.0<br />
2,285<br />
Note: Total includes 1birth with missing information on mother’s education who were not shown separately. Total includes 6<br />
children with mothers belonging to the age group 15-19, 18 with mothers belonging to the age group 40-44, 11 Buddhist and 10<br />
in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
# Total number of births may not add upto N due to don’t know and missing cases.<br />
(56 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 45 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />
(seven percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of third and higher order birth was higher than<br />
that of the state (32 percent) in Anantnag, Baramula, Kargil, Kathua, Leh and Udhampur districts,<br />
while in the remaining eight districts it was lower than that of the state. Figure 3.2 shows birth order<br />
third and above by district.<br />
3.9 Fertility Preference<br />
Table 3.9 gives percent distribution of currently married women by desire for children, according<br />
to number of living children in Jammu & Kashmir State. Out of the 864 women with no living child,<br />
15 percent were currently pregnant and five percent were using spacing methods. Further, 25 percent<br />
of the women wanted to have children within two years, over four percent women wanted to have<br />
children after two years and 3 percent were undecided about the timing of birth, while 15 percent<br />
of the women wanted to have no more children. The percentage of women who desired to have<br />
additional children decreases with increase in the number of living children. It was the highest<br />
41
Figure 3.1<br />
Birth Order 3 & above by Selected Background Characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-litertate<br />
0-9years@<br />
10 & above<br />
Caste<br />
Schedulde caste<br />
Schedulde tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
10<br />
16<br />
23<br />
29<br />
29<br />
29<br />
32<br />
35<br />
37<br />
38<br />
38<br />
45<br />
45<br />
0 10 20 Percent 30 40 50<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Figure 3.2<br />
Birth Order 3 & above by <strong>District</strong><br />
40+<br />
29%<br />
4 districts<br />
Table 3. 8 BIRTH ORDER BY DISTRICT<br />
Percent distribution of births during three years preceding the survey by birth order, according to district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Birth order<br />
1 2 3 4+<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
28.4<br />
38.5<br />
19.7<br />
41.2<br />
46.9<br />
26.2<br />
35.4<br />
24.1<br />
36.2<br />
34.6<br />
22.2<br />
15.0<br />
26.6<br />
17.0<br />
14.7<br />
23.2<br />
11.0<br />
29.6<br />
5.6<br />
3.8<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
14.5<br />
33.9<br />
32.9<br />
15.6<br />
31.0<br />
44.9<br />
32.1<br />
38.6<br />
41.6<br />
39.9<br />
22.6<br />
17.8<br />
14.4<br />
36.9<br />
13.7<br />
18.0<br />
16.2<br />
14.1<br />
6.0<br />
15.4<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
57.4<br />
44.8<br />
31.6<br />
33.8<br />
35.8<br />
36.4<br />
40.8<br />
33.2<br />
3.7<br />
10.8<br />
14.1<br />
21.0<br />
3.2<br />
8.0<br />
13.6<br />
12.1<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
35.5<br />
32.4<br />
17.7<br />
14.4<br />
matter’, that is, sex of the child is immaterial. However, 42 percent women said leave it to God.<br />
The percentage of women who said ‘upto God’ increases with increase in parity of the women.<br />
The preferred sex of the additional children was boy for 22 percent women as against only five<br />
percent women desiring girl and over 16 percent women said ‘doesn’t matter’, while 51 percent of<br />
the women said ‘upto God’. Figure 3.3 shows fertility preference of the women.<br />
Figure 3.3<br />
Fertility Preference<br />
Wants no more<br />
11%<br />
Currently pregnant<br />
4%<br />
Other<br />
21%<br />
Currently users<br />
27%<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Sterilized<br />
27%<br />
Wants another,<br />
undecided when<br />
2%<br />
Wants another, after 2<br />
years<br />
2%<br />
Wants another,<br />
within 2 years<br />
6%<br />
3.10 Pregnancy Outcomes<br />
Table 3.10 gives percent distribution of all pregnancies of currently married women aged 15-44<br />
years by their outcomes three years preceding the survey by districts in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />
The percent of pregnancies that ended in live births was 98 percent, over one percent still birth,<br />
less than one percent induced abortions and less than one percent spontaneous abortion. The<br />
percentage of live birth was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (78 percent)<br />
43
Table 3.9 FERTILITY PREFERENCE<br />
Percent distribution of currently married women by desire for children, according to number of living children, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Number of living children<br />
Desire for children<br />
Desire for additional child<br />
Wants another soon 1<br />
Wants another later 2<br />
Want another, undecided when<br />
Undecided<br />
Up to God<br />
Want no more<br />
Sterilized<br />
Currently users 3<br />
Currently pregnant<br />
Declared infecund<br />
Missing<br />
Total percent<br />
25.1<br />
4.5<br />
2.7<br />
4.6<br />
16.6<br />
14.6<br />
2.0<br />
5.4<br />
15.1<br />
5.3<br />
4.0<br />
100.0<br />
0 1 2 3 4+<br />
14.0<br />
4.0<br />
6.5<br />
4.9<br />
8.9<br />
10.8<br />
3.0<br />
37.3<br />
6.4<br />
1.7<br />
2.4<br />
100.0<br />
3.7<br />
1.6<br />
2.5<br />
4.3<br />
11.7<br />
9.1<br />
22.0<br />
38.4<br />
2.9<br />
1.5<br />
2.2<br />
100.0<br />
2.4<br />
1.6<br />
0.6<br />
2.0<br />
11.4<br />
11.2<br />
37.5<br />
28.1<br />
0.9<br />
3.0<br />
1.3<br />
100.0<br />
0.9<br />
1.2<br />
0.2<br />
2.4<br />
15.1<br />
10.7<br />
47.6<br />
14.6<br />
1.0<br />
4.2<br />
1.9<br />
100.0<br />
Total<br />
6.2<br />
2.2<br />
2.1<br />
3.4<br />
12.3<br />
10.7<br />
26.9<br />
27.7<br />
3.5<br />
2.8<br />
2.1<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
864<br />
1,618<br />
2,893<br />
2,741<br />
2,191<br />
10,308<br />
Preferred sex of additional children<br />
Boy<br />
Girl<br />
Doesn’t matter<br />
Upto God<br />
Missing<br />
23.1<br />
0.6<br />
28.1<br />
41.6<br />
6.6<br />
24.6<br />
8.3<br />
19.4<br />
43.7<br />
4.0<br />
24.5<br />
6.6<br />
14.9<br />
48.1<br />
5.9<br />
21.4<br />
4.7<br />
12.5<br />
55.4<br />
6.0<br />
16.6<br />
2.4<br />
6.7<br />
70.1<br />
4.1<br />
22.4<br />
4.9<br />
16.5<br />
50.9<br />
5.3<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
464 622 690 495<br />
438<br />
1<br />
Wants next births within 2 years. 2 Wants to delay next birth for 2 or more years. 3 Other than sterilization.<br />
2,709<br />
in Poonch district. The percentage of stillbirth was the highest (22 percent) in Poonch district,<br />
followed by six percent in Kargil district, and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula,<br />
Leh and Pulwama districts. Pregnancy wastage due to abortions was negligible in all the districts.<br />
Table 3.10 OUTCOMES OF PREGNANCY<br />
Percent distribution of all pregnancies of currently married women aged 15-44 years by their outcomes three year preceding the<br />
survey currently married women, according to districts, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s Live birth Stillbirth Induced abortion Spontaneous abortion Missing Total percent<br />
State-<strong>Rural</strong><br />
State-Urban<br />
State-Total<br />
97.9<br />
98.0<br />
98.0<br />
1.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.9<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
1.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.4<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
99.6<br />
98.9<br />
100.0<br />
99.2<br />
95.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.8<br />
1.5<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.1<br />
0.4<br />
1.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
94.1<br />
97.3<br />
99.0<br />
98.1<br />
99.3<br />
5.9<br />
1.1<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.9<br />
0.0<br />
1.9<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
77.9<br />
95.2<br />
93.0<br />
97.3<br />
22.1<br />
2.2<br />
5.6<br />
1.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
44
CHAPTER IV<br />
MATERNAL HEALTH CARE<br />
Provisions of maternal health care services to ensure safe motherhood is one of the major<br />
components of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme. The RCH programme<br />
services for antenatal care, includes at least three antenatal care visits, iron prophylaxis for pregnant and<br />
lactating women, at least one dose of tetanus toxoid vaccine, detection and treatment of anaemia<br />
in mothers, and management and referral of high-risk pregnancies, natal care, that is<br />
encouragement of safe delivery, post-natal care, and management of unwanted pregnancies. In<br />
rural areas, the government delivers reproductive health and other health services through its<br />
network of Sub-centres (SCs), Primary <strong>Health</strong> Centres (PHCs) and other health facilities. In<br />
addition, pregnant women and children can get services from private maternity homes, hospitals,<br />
private practitioners, and in some case non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and trust<br />
hospitals. In urban areas, reproductive health services are available mainly through government or<br />
municipal hospitals, Urban <strong>Health</strong> Posts (UHPs), Urban Family Welfare Centres (UFWCs),<br />
hospitals and nursing homes operated by NGOs, and private nursing and maternity homes.<br />
The <strong>National</strong> Population Policy (NPP), 2000 adopted by the Government of India<br />
(Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, 2000) reiterates the Government’s commitments to the<br />
safe motherhood programme within the wider context of reproductive health. Among the<br />
national socio-demographic goals for 2010 specified by the policy, several goals pertain to safe<br />
motherhood, that 80 percent of all deliveries should take place in institutions by 2010, hundred<br />
percent deliveries should be attended by trained personnel, and the maternal mortality ratio<br />
should be reduced to a level below 100 per 100,000 live births. Empowering women for improved<br />
health and nutrition is one of the 12 strategic themes identified in the policy to be pursued either as<br />
stand-alone programmes or as intersectoral programmes.<br />
In DLHS-RCH Phase-I, to all the eligible women who had their last pregnancy after<br />
January 1, 1999 a separate section on the status of maternal health and utilisation of maternal<br />
health care services was canvassed. In Phase-II, the same section was canvassed to all the<br />
eligible women who had their last pregnancy after January 1, 2001. The women whose last<br />
pregnancy terminated into live/still birth were asked about the details of antenatal, natal and postnatal<br />
care they received; pregnancy, delivery and post-delivery complications they suffered from and<br />
the treatment seeking behaviour in case of complications. Women whose last pregnancy terminated<br />
into abortion, either spontaneous or induced, were asked about the utilisation of safe abortion<br />
services and the post-abortion complications they experienced. This chapter presents information on<br />
antenatal, natal and postnatal care received by women whose last pregnancy had terminated<br />
during the three years preceding the survey as live birth or as stillbirth.<br />
4.1 Antenatal Check-Up<br />
Women who had given a birth during the three years preceding the survey were asked whether they<br />
had gone for antenatal check-up outside the home, and if they had, what type of service provider<br />
had given them the check-up. They were also asked whether any health worker had visited them at<br />
home to provide antenatal check-ups. Table 4.1 gives percentage of women who received any antenatal<br />
check-up during pregnancy by source of antenatal provider, according to selected background
Table 4.1 ANTENATAL CHECK-UP<br />
Percentage of women* who received any antenatal check-up (ANC) during pregnancy by source of antenatal provider, according<br />
to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Age group<br />
20-34 years<br />
35 years & above<br />
Any 1 antenatal<br />
check-up<br />
88.1<br />
84.5<br />
Antenatal<br />
check-up only<br />
at home by<br />
ANM<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
Doctor<br />
83.6<br />
80.7<br />
<strong>Health</strong> personnel providing ANC 2<br />
ANM/<br />
Nurse/ LHV<br />
6.3<br />
6.4<br />
Other health<br />
professional Other 3<br />
1.5<br />
1.6<br />
8.5<br />
11.3<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
2,294<br />
295<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
88.7<br />
87.0<br />
88.1<br />
86.2<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
84.7<br />
81.4<br />
84.5<br />
82.3<br />
7.7<br />
6.2<br />
5.9<br />
5.0<br />
1.6<br />
2.0<br />
1.1<br />
1.1<br />
6.6<br />
6.7<br />
12.5<br />
13.0<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
85.6<br />
93.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
80.6<br />
91.4<br />
7.3<br />
3.5<br />
1.8<br />
0.8<br />
9.4<br />
7.3<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 @ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
85.9<br />
86.9<br />
92.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
82.6<br />
80.7<br />
86.7<br />
5.8<br />
7.6<br />
6.7<br />
1.0<br />
2.2<br />
2.4<br />
9.0<br />
13.3<br />
4.9<br />
1,456<br />
514<br />
625<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
84.7<br />
88.9<br />
95.6<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
75.9<br />
87.0<br />
95.4<br />
9.4<br />
5.0<br />
0.3<br />
2.1<br />
1.2<br />
0.3<br />
4.4<br />
11.9<br />
2.5<br />
938<br />
1,566<br />
70<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
82.3<br />
61.7<br />
93.0<br />
89.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
72.8<br />
53.0<br />
90.7<br />
86.1<br />
9.1<br />
14.4<br />
4.5<br />
5.5<br />
1.9<br />
4.1<br />
1.0<br />
1.3<br />
2.3<br />
4.8<br />
12.2<br />
9.7<br />
346<br />
159<br />
487<br />
1,575<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
71.4<br />
90.5<br />
92.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
65.1<br />
86.2<br />
88.9<br />
8.8<br />
6.5<br />
4.3<br />
0.9<br />
1.8<br />
1.5<br />
2.7<br />
12.3<br />
4.9<br />
453<br />
1,517<br />
625<br />
Availability of health facility 4<br />
in the village<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
86.0<br />
85.5<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
81.5<br />
80.3<br />
8.1<br />
7.1<br />
2.4<br />
1.6<br />
7.6<br />
9.9<br />
448<br />
1,517<br />
Total<br />
87.6<br />
0.0<br />
83.2<br />
6.4<br />
1.5<br />
8.9<br />
2,595<br />
* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total<br />
includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
1<br />
Antenatal check-ups either at home or outside from home at health facility.<br />
2<br />
Antenatal check-ups outside home and percentage add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses<br />
3<br />
Other also includes trained and untrained dai .<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />
included. 4 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village.<br />
characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. About 88 percent of the women received antenatal<br />
check-up during the three years preceding the survey, which is more than RCH Round I (58 percent).<br />
Eighty-three percent of the women received antenatal check-up from the doctor, over six percent<br />
from ANM/Nurse/LHV and over 11 percent from other health professional and others. However,<br />
none of the women received ANC at home. Figure 4.1 shows source of antenatal care.<br />
46
Figure 4.1<br />
Source of Antenatal Care<br />
Any ANC<br />
88<br />
ANC Provider<br />
2<br />
Doctor<br />
83<br />
ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />
6<br />
Other<br />
9<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Note: Based on last live/still<br />
birth, born during three<br />
Percent<br />
years preceding the survey<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Eighty-six percent of the women in rural areas as against 94 percent of the women in<br />
urban areas received antenatal check-up, while it was 88 percent in the state. Further, 88 percent of<br />
the women aged 20-34 years as against over 84 percent women aged 35 years and above received<br />
antenatal check-up. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 85 percent<br />
for Hindu women as against 89 percent for Muslim women and 96 percent for Sikh women.<br />
Similarly, percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 82 percent for scheduled<br />
caste women as against 62 percent for scheduled tribe women and 93 percent for OBC women.<br />
The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up was 86 percent for non-literate<br />
women as against 87 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 92 percent<br />
for women who had studied for 10 years and above. The percentage of women who received<br />
antenatal check-up was 71 percent for women with low SLI as against over 90 percent for women<br />
with medium SLI and 92 percent for women with high SLI. Further, percentage of women who<br />
received antenatal check-up was around 86 percent for women living in villages irrespective whether<br />
health facility exists in the village or not.<br />
The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was 81<br />
percent in rural and 91 percent in urban areas, while it was 83 percent for the district. Eighty-four<br />
percent of the women aged 20-34 years as against 81 percent of the women aged 35 years and<br />
above received antenatal check-up from the doctor. Eighty-one percent of women who had studied<br />
for 0-9 years as against 87 percent of women who had studied for 10 years and above received<br />
antenatal check-up from the doctor, while it was 83 percent for non-literate women. Seventythree<br />
percent of scheduled caste women as against 53 percent of scheduled tribe women received<br />
antenatal check-up from the doctor, while it was 91 percent for OBC women. The percentage of<br />
women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was 89 percent for women with high<br />
SLI, 65 percent for women with low SLI and 86 percent for women with medium SLI. Only six<br />
percent women received antenatal check-up from ANM/Nurse/LHV in the state.<br />
4.2 Antenatal Check-Ups at <strong>Health</strong> Facility<br />
DLHS-RCH asked women who had a birth during the three years preceding the survey whether<br />
47
women had received antenatal check-up, and if they had, from where they had availed such<br />
services. During pregnancy, women received antenatal check-up from multiple sources such as,<br />
health workers providing ANC at home, Government health facility, private health facility, and<br />
at Indian System of medicine etc. Women who received antenatal check-up both at home and<br />
outside the home are categorised as having received care outside the home. Table 4.2 gives<br />
percentage of women who received antenatal check-up during pregnancy by source and place of<br />
antenatal check-up, according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />
Two-third of the women received antenatal check-up at the Government health facility, including<br />
five percent through primary health centre and three percent through sub-centre, and 16 percent<br />
at a private health facility. Further, about two percent of women received antenatal check-up at<br />
the Government ISM health facility and over four percent at private ISM health facility, while over<br />
one percent women had it from other health facility.<br />
Seventy three percent of the women aged 35 years and above as against 66 percent of the<br />
women aged 20-34 years received antenatal-check-ups at the government health facility. Sixty-six<br />
percent women from rural areas as against 69 percent of women from urban areas availed<br />
government health facilities for antenatal check-up. Sixty-six percent of non-literate women and<br />
women who had studied for 10 years and above received antenatal check-up at Government<br />
health facility, while it was 71 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Sixty-nine<br />
percent of Hindu women as against 66 percent of Muslim women received antenatal check-up<br />
from government health facility, while it was 63 percent for Sikh women.<br />
Fifteen percent women in rural areas as against 19 percent women in urban areas received<br />
antenatal check-up from private health facility, while it was 16 percent for the state. The percentage<br />
of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was 17 percent for women<br />
aged 20-34 years as against nine percent for women aged 35 years and above. The percentage of<br />
women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was the highest (27 percent)<br />
for OBC women, followed by 14 percent for other caste women and the lowest (10 percent) for<br />
scheduled caste women. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private<br />
health facility was 13 percent for Hindus as against 17 percent for Muslims and 24 percent for Sikhs.<br />
The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was the<br />
highest (22 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (13<br />
percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 14 percent for non-literate women.<br />
Similarly, percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was<br />
the highest (21 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (over four percent) for women<br />
with low SLI, while it was 17 percent for women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of women<br />
who received antenatal check-up at the private health facility was 17 percent for women living in<br />
villages having no health facility in the village as against 14 percent for women living in villages<br />
having health facility in the village.<br />
4.3 Antenatal Check-Up by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 4.3 gives percent of women who received any antenatal care by source and place of antenatal<br />
check-up by district. The percentage of women who received any antenatal check-up was the highest<br />
(98 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 97 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (55<br />
percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of women who had any antenatal check-up was higher<br />
than that of the state (88 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh,<br />
48
Table 4.2 PLACE OF ANTENATAL CHECK-UP<br />
Percentage of women* who received any antenatal check-ups (ANC) during pregnancy by source and place of antenatal<br />
check-ups, according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Antenatal<br />
check-up<br />
only at<br />
home<br />
Government<br />
2<br />
health<br />
facility<br />
Place of antenatal check-ups 1<br />
Private 3<br />
health<br />
facility PHC SC<br />
Govt.<br />
ISM 4 facility<br />
Private<br />
Other<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Age group<br />
20-34 years<br />
35 years & above<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
66.2<br />
72.9<br />
16.6<br />
9.3<br />
4.9<br />
6.3<br />
2.5<br />
5.3<br />
1.7<br />
2.1<br />
4.5<br />
3.1<br />
1.3<br />
1.6<br />
2,294<br />
295<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
66.1<br />
64.1<br />
68.9<br />
71.6<br />
16.5<br />
19.3<br />
14.2<br />
9.9<br />
4.0<br />
5.2<br />
5.8<br />
5.6<br />
2.6<br />
3.0<br />
2.4<br />
3.6<br />
2.4<br />
1.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.3<br />
6.4<br />
4.7<br />
1.7<br />
2.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.8<br />
0.8<br />
1.0<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
66.1<br />
69.3<br />
14.7<br />
19.3<br />
5.2<br />
4.6<br />
3.5<br />
1.1<br />
1.7<br />
1.6<br />
4.0<br />
5.1<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 @ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
66.2<br />
70.6<br />
65.6<br />
14.1<br />
12.6<br />
22.4<br />
4.6<br />
5.8<br />
5.3<br />
3.0<br />
4.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.9<br />
1.8<br />
3.0<br />
5.4<br />
6.3<br />
1.1<br />
1.5<br />
1.7<br />
1,456<br />
514<br />
625<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
68.6<br />
65.9<br />
62.9<br />
13.3<br />
17.0<br />
23.7<br />
7.7<br />
3.5<br />
0.5<br />
4.4<br />
2.1<br />
0.3<br />
1.9<br />
1.6<br />
1.5<br />
5.9<br />
3.2<br />
11.0<br />
1.9<br />
1.1<br />
0.3<br />
938<br />
1,566<br />
70<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
72.4<br />
55.0<br />
62.6<br />
67.8<br />
9.9<br />
10.9<br />
27.1<br />
14.3<br />
9.6<br />
10.7<br />
1.9<br />
4.6<br />
2.9<br />
13.9<br />
1.3<br />
2.5<br />
1.6<br />
7.1<br />
0.8<br />
1.5<br />
3.7<br />
5.6<br />
3.2<br />
4.6<br />
1.2<br />
4.7<br />
0.8<br />
1.3<br />
346<br />
159<br />
487<br />
1,575<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
61.8<br />
69.1<br />
65.2<br />
4.5<br />
17.1<br />
21.0<br />
5.2<br />
4.9<br />
5.2<br />
6.0<br />
2.8<br />
1.3<br />
1.8<br />
1.7<br />
1.6<br />
4.1<br />
3.7<br />
5.8<br />
1.3<br />
1.5<br />
0.9<br />
453<br />
1,517<br />
625<br />
Availability of health<br />
facility 5 in the village<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
61.9<br />
67.4<br />
16.7<br />
14.1<br />
8.1<br />
4.3<br />
3.5<br />
3.5<br />
3.1<br />
1.3<br />
2.9<br />
4.4<br />
1.7<br />
1.3<br />
448<br />
1,517<br />
Total<br />
0.0 66.9 15.8 5.0 2.9 1.7 4.3 1.3 2,595<br />
* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />
Note-1: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
Note-2: Total includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />
included. 1 Antenatal check-ups outside home and percentage add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses.<br />
2 Includes subcentre,<br />
primary health centre, community health centre or rural hospital, urban health centre/ urban health post/ urban family<br />
welfare centre, government hospital or dispensary. 3 Includes Private hospital/clinic or non-governmental hospital/ trust<br />
hospital or clinic. 4 Indian system of medicine. 5 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or<br />
referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />
Pulwama and Udhampur districts, while in the remaining five districts it was lower than that of the<br />
state. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was the highest<br />
(97 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 95 percent in Katgil district and the lowest (35 percent)<br />
in Poonch district. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the doctor was<br />
higher than that of the state (83 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara,<br />
49
Table 4.3 ANTENATAL CHECK-UP BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of women* who received any antenatal care (ANC), by source and place of antenatal check-ups by district, Jammu &<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Any 1<br />
antenatal<br />
check-up<br />
Antenatal<br />
check-up only<br />
at home by<br />
ANM<br />
<strong>Health</strong> personnel<br />
providing ANC<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/<br />
Nurse<br />
Place of antenatal check-ups<br />
Government 2<br />
Private 3 health<br />
health facility facility<br />
ISM 4 facility<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
89.4<br />
88.9<br />
97.9<br />
56.5<br />
88.8<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
89.2<br />
86.7<br />
97.3<br />
47.7<br />
84.4<br />
3.2<br />
6.1<br />
0.6<br />
15.7<br />
3.1<br />
80.6<br />
76.9<br />
64.7<br />
48.0<br />
76.4<br />
7.4<br />
11.9<br />
32.7<br />
12.4<br />
10.4<br />
4.1<br />
7.8<br />
0.7<br />
4.6<br />
3.9<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
96.9<br />
73.7<br />
92.8<br />
92.0<br />
94.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
94.6<br />
57.2<br />
90.7<br />
92.0<br />
92.4<br />
7.9<br />
18.5<br />
7.4<br />
0.0<br />
5.1<br />
93.3<br />
61.3<br />
6.3<br />
92.0<br />
79.7<br />
5.6<br />
10.2<br />
6.8<br />
0.0<br />
13.6<br />
5.3<br />
5.9<br />
2.7<br />
0.0<br />
1.2<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
54.8<br />
64.2<br />
87.0<br />
89.6<br />
1.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.0<br />
34.9<br />
37.0<br />
80.9<br />
80.5<br />
16.6<br />
42.3<br />
15.4<br />
11.9<br />
47.4<br />
54.5<br />
69.8<br />
53.0<br />
4.6<br />
35.8<br />
12.2<br />
16.5<br />
3.1<br />
41.1<br />
9.2<br />
5.3<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
87.6<br />
0.0<br />
83.2<br />
6.4<br />
66.9<br />
15.8<br />
4.5<br />
1<br />
* Women who had last live/still birth during three years preceding the survey. Antenatal check-ups either at home or health<br />
facility. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or rural hospital, urban health centre/ urban health<br />
post/ urban family welfare centre, government hospital or dispensary. 3 Includes Private hospital/clinic or non-governmental<br />
hospital/ trust hospital or clinic. 4 Either government or private Indian system of medicine.<br />
Leh and Pulwama districts, while in the remaining six districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />
The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up from the ANM/Nurse was the highest<br />
(42 percent) in Rajouri district, followed by over 18 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Leh district, while it was over six percent for the state.<br />
The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the government health facility<br />
was the highest (93 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 92 percent in Leh district and the lowest (six<br />
percent) in Kupwara district. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the<br />
government health facility was higher than that of the state (67 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Jammu,<br />
Kargil, Leh, Puwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining seven districts it was lower than<br />
that of the state. The percentage of women who received antenatal check-up at the private health<br />
facility was the highest (36 percent) in Rajouri district, followed by 33 percent in Baramula district and<br />
the lowest (zero percent) in Leh district, while it was 16 percent for the state. The extent of antenatal<br />
check-up received by women at the ISM health facility was the highest (41 percent) in Rajouri<br />
district, followed by nine percent in Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in Leh district,<br />
while it was over four percent for the state.<br />
4.4 Components of Antenatal Check-up<br />
Women who received any kind of antenatal check-up were asked whether they received each of<br />
the several components of antenatal check-up at least once during their pregnancy. Table 4.4<br />
gives percentage of women who received any antenatal check-up by specific components of antenatal<br />
check-up by residence in Jammu & Kashmir state. Except for X-rays (which are not recommended<br />
as a standard component of antenatal care), all of the measurements and testes are part of essential<br />
50
Table 4.4 COMPONENTS OF ANTENATAL CHECK-UPS<br />
Percentage of women* who received an antenatal check-up by specific components of antenatal check-up, according to<br />
residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Components of antenatal check-ups Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Antenatal measurements/tests<br />
Weight measured<br />
Height measured<br />
Blood pressure checked<br />
Blood tested<br />
Urine tested<br />
Abdomen examined<br />
Internal examined<br />
Breast examined<br />
X-ray<br />
Sonography /ultrasound<br />
Amniocentesis<br />
59.2<br />
22.2<br />
89.0<br />
92.5<br />
89.2<br />
75.1<br />
39.5<br />
26.9<br />
12.2<br />
10.9<br />
9.8<br />
53.5<br />
23.1<br />
90.8<br />
93.4<br />
90.3<br />
76.3<br />
38.5<br />
26.5<br />
13.2<br />
10.5<br />
10.0<br />
75.5<br />
19.7<br />
83.8<br />
89.9<br />
86.0<br />
71.5<br />
42.4<br />
28.0<br />
9.4<br />
11.9<br />
9.4<br />
Antenatal advice<br />
Diet<br />
Danger signs of pregnancy<br />
Delivery care<br />
Breast feeding<br />
New born care<br />
Family planning<br />
83.8<br />
38.4<br />
70.2<br />
50.5<br />
52.9<br />
30.9<br />
83.7<br />
35.1<br />
73.8<br />
53.0<br />
53.3<br />
31.4<br />
84.2<br />
47.8<br />
59.7<br />
43.3<br />
51.9<br />
29.6<br />
Number of women who received<br />
any antenatal check-up<br />
2,274<br />
1,682<br />
592<br />
* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001<br />
obstetric care or are required for monitoring high-risk pregnancies.<br />
Fifty-nine percent women were weighted, 89 percent women had their blood pressure<br />
checked and 75 percent women had abdominal examination as the part of the antenatal check-up.<br />
Other common components of antenatal check-up were blood test (92 percent), urine test (89<br />
percent), height measurement (22 percent), internal examination (39 percent) and breast examination<br />
(27 percent). About 11 percent women had sonography or ultrasound, 12 percent women had X-ray<br />
and 10 percent women reported that they had amniocentesis test.<br />
The type of advice received by women who had antenatal check-up shows that advice on<br />
diet was given to 84 percent women irrespective of the residence. Thirty-eight percent women<br />
received advice on danger signs of pregnancy in the state – 35 percent in rural areas and 48<br />
percent in urban areas. Seventy percent women receive advice on delivery care in the state - 74<br />
percent in rural areas and 60 percent in urban areas. Advice on breastfeeding was given to 50<br />
percent women in the state – 53 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. Advice on<br />
newborn care was given to 53 percent women in the state irrespective of the residence. Advice on<br />
family planning was given to 31 percent women in the state irrespective of the residence.<br />
4.5 Antenatal Care Services<br />
The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme covers all pregnant women should be registered<br />
in the first 12-16 weeks of the pregnancy (Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Family Welfare, 1997).<br />
Accordingly, the first antenatal check-ups should take place at latest during the first trimester of<br />
the pregnancy. It also includes the provision of at least three antenatal care visits, of at least one<br />
tetanus toxoid injection, and supplementary iron in the form of IFA tablets daily for 100 days. To<br />
51
assess whether the women had received all the care during pregnancy, information was collected<br />
regarding number of antenatal visits, timing of the first visit, received tetanus toxoid injection and<br />
supplement iron folic acid tablets.<br />
Table 4.5 gives percent distribution of women who had live/still birth during three years<br />
preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-up, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first<br />
check-up, the number of TT injections received and were IFA tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and<br />
percentage who received full antenatal check-up by selected background characteristics in Jammu<br />
& Kashmir State. The percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits<br />
was 80 percent in the state – 78 percent in rural areas and 88 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />
of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits was 83 percent for women with three<br />
or more children ever born as against around 79 percent for women with two and less children<br />
ever born. The percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits was 72<br />
percent for Hindu women as against 85 percent for Muslim women, while it was 89 percent for<br />
Sikh women. Similarly, percentage of women who made at least three antenatal check-up visits<br />
was the highest (85 percent) for OBC women, followed by 84 percent for other caste women and<br />
the lowest (56 percent) for scheduled tribe women, while it was 66 percent for scheduled caste<br />
women.<br />
The percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was the<br />
highest (84 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (74<br />
percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 81 percent for non-literate<br />
women. The percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was 62<br />
percent for women with low SLI as against 84 percent for women with medium and high SLI.<br />
Further, percentage of women who made at-least three antenatal check-up visits was 79 percent for<br />
women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 77 percent for women<br />
living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />
Data on timing of first antenatal check-ups shows that 63 percent women received their<br />
first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy, 23 percent in the second trimester, while<br />
one percent women received their first check-up in the third trimester. The percentage of women<br />
who had first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was the highest (67 percent)<br />
for women having four or more children ever born, followed by 64 percent for women having<br />
one child ever born and the lowest (61 percent) for women having two children ever born. Fiftythree<br />
percent of Hindu women as against 69 percent of Muslim women had first antenatal checkup<br />
in the first trimester, while it was 68 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women who<br />
had first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was the highest (74 percent) for<br />
OBC women, followed by 66 percent for other caste women and the lowest (40 percent) for<br />
scheduled tribe women, while it was 50 percent for scheduled tribe women.<br />
The percentage of women who received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of<br />
pregnancy was 59 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against 66 percent for<br />
women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 63 percent for non-literate women.<br />
The extent of women who received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy<br />
was the highest (69 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (45 percent) for women<br />
with low SLI, while it was 63 percent for women with high SLI. The percentage of women who<br />
received their first antenatal check-up in the first trimester of pregnancy was 58 percent for women<br />
52
Table 4.5 ANTENATAL CARE<br />
Percent distribution of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-ups, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first checkup,<br />
the number of tetanus toxoid injections received and were given iron folic acid (IFA) tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and percentage who received full antenatal check-ups by<br />
some selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir Statate, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Antenatal care indicators<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence Education Children ever born<br />
Urban<br />
Nonliterate<br />
0-9@<br />
years<br />
10 years &<br />
above 1 2 3 4+<br />
Number of ANC visits<br />
No visit<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Missing<br />
12.1<br />
1.6<br />
5.8<br />
8.9<br />
71.3<br />
0.3<br />
14.0<br />
1.9<br />
5.9<br />
8.8<br />
69.0<br />
0.4<br />
6.0<br />
0.5<br />
5.6<br />
9.2<br />
78.5<br />
0.1<br />
13.9<br />
0.8<br />
4.5<br />
8.6<br />
72.0<br />
0.3<br />
12.7<br />
3.8<br />
8.6<br />
11.5<br />
63.0<br />
0.4<br />
7.4<br />
1.6<br />
6.6<br />
7.4<br />
76.6<br />
0.3<br />
10.9<br />
2.5<br />
6.8<br />
10.5<br />
69.0<br />
0.4<br />
12.5<br />
1.6<br />
7.1<br />
6.4<br />
72.0<br />
0.5<br />
11.9<br />
1.0<br />
4.3<br />
8.3<br />
74.4<br />
0.0<br />
13.8<br />
0.6<br />
2.9<br />
11.5<br />
71.1<br />
0.0<br />
Stage of pregnancy at the time of the first antenatal check-up<br />
No antenatal check-up<br />
First trimester<br />
Second trimester<br />
Third trimester<br />
Missing<br />
12.2<br />
63.2<br />
23.4<br />
0.9<br />
0.3<br />
14.2<br />
61.8<br />
22.5<br />
1.2<br />
0.4<br />
6.0<br />
67.4<br />
26.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
13.9<br />
63.4<br />
22.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.3<br />
12.9<br />
59.4<br />
24.8<br />
2.4<br />
0.4<br />
7.6<br />
65.7<br />
24.9<br />
1.5<br />
0.3<br />
11.0<br />
63.8<br />
23.5<br />
1.3<br />
0.4<br />
12.6<br />
60.7<br />
25.0<br />
1.2<br />
0.5<br />
11.9<br />
63.4<br />
24.0<br />
0.6<br />
0.0<br />
13.8<br />
66.8<br />
19.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Women who received TT<br />
No TT<br />
1<br />
2+<br />
Do not remember/missing<br />
11.7<br />
7.2<br />
73.6<br />
7.5<br />
12.1<br />
6.2<br />
75.2<br />
6.5<br />
10.5<br />
10.5<br />
68.6<br />
10.4<br />
12.5<br />
5.5<br />
76.8<br />
5.2<br />
11.1<br />
10.0<br />
68.8<br />
10.1<br />
10.5<br />
8.9<br />
70.0<br />
10.6<br />
12.3<br />
10.3<br />
69.5<br />
7.9<br />
12.7<br />
5.5<br />
71.8<br />
10.0<br />
8.9<br />
8.1<br />
77.3<br />
5.7<br />
12.1<br />
3.9<br />
80.2<br />
3.7<br />
Women who received IFA tablets/syrup<br />
No IFA/syrup<br />
Received but not consumed<br />
Consumed one IFA per day<br />
23.4<br />
1.8<br />
27.5<br />
26.6<br />
1.3<br />
24.0<br />
13.5<br />
3.7<br />
38.3<br />
24.8<br />
1.3<br />
20.1<br />
24.5<br />
2.2<br />
31.1<br />
19.4<br />
2.7<br />
41.7<br />
24.1<br />
2.3<br />
31.9<br />
24.8<br />
1.0<br />
31.4<br />
17.9<br />
2.8<br />
25.4<br />
26.2<br />
1.4<br />
14.2<br />
Received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup<br />
53.7<br />
52.2<br />
58.1<br />
52.8<br />
56.1<br />
53.9<br />
50.6<br />
52.3<br />
58.1<br />
56.8<br />
Percentage of women who received full 1 antenatal check-ups<br />
44.4<br />
43.9<br />
46.2<br />
45.2<br />
43.8<br />
43.1<br />
39.4<br />
40.3<br />
52.0<br />
52.8<br />
Number of women<br />
2,595<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
1,456<br />
514<br />
625<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity and 1 with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />
1<br />
At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and was given adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup.<br />
Continued…<br />
53
Table 4.5 ANTENATAL CARE (contd)<br />
Percent distribution of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by number of antenatal check-ups, the stage of pregnancy at the time of first check-up, the number of<br />
tetanus toxoid injections received and iron and were given iron folic acid (IFA) tablets/syrup during pregnancy, and percentage who received full antenatal check-ups by some selected background<br />
characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir State, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Availability of health<br />
Religion Caste# Standard of living index facility 2 in the village<br />
Antenatal care indicators<br />
Hindu Muslim Sikh<br />
Scheduled<br />
caste<br />
Scheduled<br />
tribe<br />
Other<br />
backward class<br />
Other Low Medium High No Yes<br />
Number of ANC visits<br />
No visit<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Missing<br />
14.5<br />
2.2<br />
10.7<br />
10.5<br />
61.3<br />
0.8<br />
11.1<br />
1.3<br />
2.8<br />
7.4<br />
77.4<br />
0.0<br />
4.4<br />
0.0<br />
6.7<br />
19.6<br />
69.3<br />
0.0<br />
16.9<br />
1.7<br />
14.1<br />
11.2<br />
55.2<br />
0.7<br />
38.3<br />
1.0<br />
4.4<br />
9.2<br />
47.1<br />
0.0<br />
6.9<br />
3.6<br />
4.5<br />
8.0<br />
76.9<br />
0.0<br />
10.0<br />
1.0<br />
4.6<br />
8.8<br />
75.3<br />
0.3<br />
28.0<br />
1.3<br />
8.3<br />
8.5<br />
53.3<br />
0.6<br />
9.3<br />
1.6<br />
4.8<br />
8.7<br />
75.4<br />
0.2<br />
7.4<br />
1.8<br />
6.4<br />
9.7<br />
74.5<br />
0.2<br />
13.7<br />
0.1<br />
6.6<br />
12.2<br />
67.1<br />
0.3<br />
14.1<br />
2.4<br />
5.7<br />
7.7<br />
69.6<br />
0.4<br />
Stage of pregnancy at the time of the<br />
first antenatal check-up<br />
No antenatal check-up<br />
First trimester<br />
Second trimester<br />
Third trimester<br />
Missing<br />
14.8<br />
53.1<br />
29.9<br />
1.4<br />
0.8<br />
11.1<br />
68.9<br />
19.5<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
4.4<br />
68.4<br />
24.5<br />
2.8<br />
0.0<br />
16.9<br />
49.9<br />
30.1<br />
2.3<br />
0.7<br />
38.3<br />
39.6<br />
20.4<br />
1.7<br />
0.0<br />
7.2<br />
73.7<br />
18.7<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
10.1<br />
66.1<br />
22.9<br />
0.7<br />
0.3<br />
28.0<br />
44.9<br />
25.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
9.5<br />
68.7<br />
21.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
7.4<br />
63.1<br />
27.4<br />
1.9<br />
0.2<br />
14.2<br />
57.8<br />
26.5<br />
1.1<br />
0.3<br />
14.1<br />
63.0<br />
21.3<br />
1.2<br />
0.4<br />
Women who received TT<br />
No TT<br />
1<br />
2+<br />
Do not remember/missing<br />
11.5<br />
14.4<br />
61.1<br />
12.9<br />
12.0<br />
2.9<br />
80.8<br />
4.3<br />
9.5<br />
5.8<br />
78.7<br />
6.1<br />
12.8<br />
14.7<br />
61.7<br />
10.7<br />
31.7<br />
12.8<br />
48.5<br />
7.0<br />
6.7<br />
4.8<br />
83.6<br />
4.9<br />
10.3<br />
5.9<br />
76.6<br />
7.2<br />
22.6<br />
8.1<br />
61.9<br />
7.4<br />
9.2<br />
6.1<br />
79.0<br />
5.7<br />
10.1<br />
9.4<br />
68.8<br />
11.7<br />
13.7<br />
10.8<br />
69.1<br />
6.4<br />
11.7<br />
4.8<br />
76.9<br />
6.5<br />
Women who received IFA tablets/syrup<br />
No IFA/syrup<br />
Received but not consumed<br />
Consumed one IFA per day<br />
25.5<br />
2.8<br />
43.5<br />
22.7<br />
1.4<br />
16.4<br />
16.8<br />
0.0<br />
63.6<br />
28.7<br />
2.8<br />
43.2<br />
44.2<br />
0.6<br />
24.2<br />
15.0<br />
1.2<br />
24.6<br />
23.0<br />
1.8<br />
25.6<br />
45.0<br />
0.2<br />
28.7<br />
19.9<br />
2.0<br />
21.2<br />
16.4<br />
2.7<br />
41.7<br />
29.6<br />
0.9<br />
21.9<br />
25.7<br />
1.4<br />
24.6<br />
Received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup<br />
48.4<br />
56.2<br />
67.5<br />
41.6<br />
34.5<br />
60.3<br />
56.8<br />
31.8<br />
57.7<br />
59.8<br />
56.4<br />
51.0<br />
Percentage of women who received full 1<br />
-antenatal check-ups<br />
34.8<br />
49.9<br />
48.8<br />
28.7<br />
25.5<br />
53.9<br />
47.5<br />
22.3<br />
50.8<br />
44.9<br />
47.6<br />
42.8<br />
Number of women<br />
938<br />
1,566<br />
70<br />
346<br />
159<br />
487<br />
1,575<br />
453<br />
1,517<br />
625<br />
448<br />
1,517<br />
Note: total includes 22 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to don’t know and missing cases.<br />
1<br />
At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and was given adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup.<br />
2<br />
Includes sub-center, primary health center, community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />
54
living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 63 percent for women living<br />
in villages having health facility in the village.<br />
Nutritional deficiencies in women are often exacerbated during pregnancy because of the<br />
additional nutrient requirements of foetal growth; therefore a pregnant woman needs six times<br />
more iron than a non-pregnant woman. The information on receiving iron folic acid tablets/syrup<br />
during pregnancy was also collected. The percentage of women who received IFA supplements was<br />
77 percent in the state – 73 percent in rural areas and 86 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />
women who received IFA supplements was the highest (82 percent) for women having three<br />
children ever born and the lowest (74 percent) for women having four or more children ever<br />
born, while it was 76 percent for women with one child ever born. The percentage of women who<br />
received IFA supplements was 74 percent for Hindu women as against 77 percent for Muslim<br />
women, while it was 83 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women who received IFA<br />
supplements was the highest (85 percent) for OBC women, followed by 77 percent for other caste<br />
women and the lowest (71 percent) for scheduled caste women. The percentage of women who<br />
received IFA supplements was 81 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and above<br />
and around 75 percent for non-literate women and women who had studied for 0-9 years. The<br />
percentage of women who received IFA supplements was the highest (84 percent) for women with<br />
high SLI and the lowest (55 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 80 percent for<br />
women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of women who received IFA supplements was 70<br />
percent women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 74 percent for<br />
women living in villages having health facility in the village. Fifty-four percent women received<br />
100+IFA tablets/syrup in the state - 52 percent in rural areas and 58 percent in urban areas. More<br />
of women with parity three or more than women with parity two or less received 100+IFA<br />
tablets/syrup. More of Muslim women than Hind women had 100+ IFA tablets/syrup. More of<br />
OBC and other caste women than SC/ST women had received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup. The<br />
percentage of women who received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup was 56 percent for women who had<br />
studied for 0-9 years and around 53 percent for non-literate women and women who had studied<br />
for 10 years and above. The percentage of women who received 100+ IFA tablets/syrup was the<br />
highest (60 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (32 percent) for women with low<br />
SLI, while it was 58 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />
For the last live birth or stillbirth during the three years preceding the survey, women<br />
were asked whether they were given tetanus toxoid injection to prevent them and their baby from<br />
getting tetanus. The percentage of women who received one or more tetanus toxoid injection was 81<br />
percent in the state – 81 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />
women who received atleast one tetanus toxoid injection was around 85 percent for women with<br />
three or more children ever born as against 77 percent for women with two children ever born,<br />
while it was 80 percent for women with one child ever born. The coverage of at least one tetanus<br />
toxoid injection was 75 percent for Hindu women as against 84 percent for Muslim and Sikh<br />
women. The coverage of at least one tetanus toxoid injection was the highest (88 percent) for<br />
OBC women, followed by 82 percent for other caste women and the lowest (61 percent) for<br />
schedule tribe women. The percentage of women who received at-least one tetanus toxoid injection<br />
was 82 percent for non-literate women as against 79 percent for literate women.<br />
The percentage of women who received full antenatal care (that is, at-least three antenatal<br />
check-ups, at least one tetanus toxoid injection and supplementary iron in the form of IFA tablets<br />
55
daily for 100 days as recommended by the RCH programme,) was 44 percent in the state – 44<br />
percent in rural areas and 46 percent in urban areas. Around 53 percent women with three or<br />
more children ever born as against around 40 percent women with two or less children ever born<br />
received full antenatal care. Coverage of full antenatal care was 35 percent for Hindu women as<br />
against 50 percent for Muslim women, while it was 49 percent for Sikh women. The percentage<br />
of women who received full antenatal care was the highest (54 percent) for OBC women, followed<br />
by 47 percent for other caste women and the lowest (25 percent) for scheduled tribe women. The<br />
percentage of women who received full antenatal care was 45 percent for non-literate women as<br />
against 43 percent for literate women. The percentage of women who received full antenatal care<br />
was the highest (51 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (22 percent) for women<br />
with low SLI, while it was 45 percent for women with high SLI. Further, percentage of women who<br />
received full antenatal care was 48 percent for women living in villages having no health facility in<br />
the village as against 43 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />
Figure 4.2 shows full antenatal care by background characteristics.<br />
Figure 4.2<br />
Full Antenatal Care by Background Characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 years@<br />
10 & above<br />
Caste<br />
Schedulde Caste<br />
Schedulde Tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of Living<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
22<br />
26<br />
29<br />
44<br />
44<br />
46<br />
45<br />
44<br />
43<br />
48<br />
45<br />
51<br />
54<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Percent<br />
@ Literate mothers with no years of schooling are also included. Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
4.6 Antenatal Care Indicator by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 4.6 gives percentage of women who received different type of antenatal care by district in<br />
Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women who had antenatal check-up in the first<br />
trimester of pregnancy was the highest (93 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 74 percent<br />
in Anantnag district and the lowest (24 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 63 percent for the<br />
state. Further, percentage of women who received three or more antenatal check-up was the highest<br />
(98 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 96 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (33 percent)<br />
56
Table 4.6 ANTENATAL CARE INDICATORS BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of women* who received different type of antenatal care by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Percentage that received<br />
an antenatal check-up in<br />
the first trimester of<br />
pregnancy<br />
Percentage that<br />
received three or<br />
more antenatal<br />
check-ups<br />
Percentage that<br />
received at least<br />
one tetanus<br />
toxoid injection<br />
Percentage that<br />
received<br />
adequate<br />
amount of IFA 1<br />
Percentage<br />
that received<br />
full 2 antenatal<br />
check-ups<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
74.3<br />
56.9<br />
93.2<br />
36.0<br />
63.8<br />
84.2<br />
88.5<br />
97.6<br />
52.7<br />
81.8<br />
98.3<br />
61.4<br />
97.3<br />
51.6<br />
78.7<br />
37.1<br />
35.3<br />
95.5<br />
33.9<br />
64.6<br />
33.0<br />
25.9<br />
93.8<br />
22.6<br />
46.2<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
65.2<br />
29.5<br />
64.3<br />
68.2<br />
60.8<br />
95.8<br />
38.5<br />
91.2<br />
89.6<br />
91.8<br />
93.2<br />
72.6<br />
85.0<br />
87.5<br />
88.4<br />
38.9<br />
7.6<br />
41.7<br />
58.7<br />
44.3<br />
37.6<br />
6.6<br />
32.2<br />
58.7<br />
37.0<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
24.4<br />
41.3<br />
28.8<br />
41.8<br />
33.4<br />
53.8<br />
66.8<br />
81.7<br />
34.4<br />
43.9<br />
39.0<br />
78.3<br />
33.6<br />
49.9<br />
25.9<br />
39.0<br />
9.8<br />
20.0<br />
10.6<br />
29.7<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
63.2<br />
80.2<br />
80.8<br />
53.7<br />
44.4<br />
* Women who had their last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001<br />
1<br />
100 or more iron folic acid tablets including syrup<br />
2<br />
At least three visits for antenatal check-ups, at least one TT injection received and adequate amount of IFA<br />
in Poonch district, while it was 80 percent for the state. The percentage of women who received<br />
at-least one TT injection was the highest (98 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 97<br />
percent in Baramula district and the lowest (34 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 81 percent<br />
for the state. The percentage of women who received adequate amount of IFA tablets/syrup was<br />
the highest (95 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 65 percent in Jammu district and the<br />
lowest (eight percent) in Kathua district, while it was 54 percent in the state. Again, The percentage<br />
of women who had full antenatal check-up was the highest (94 percent) in Baramula district,<br />
followed by 59 percent in Leh district and the lowest (seven percent) in Kathua district. The<br />
percentage of women who had full antenatal check-up was the higher than that of the state (44<br />
percent) in Baramula, Jammu and Leh district, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than<br />
that of the state.<br />
4.7 Pregnancy Complications and Treatment<br />
Complications during pregnancy may affect both women’s health and the outcome of the pregnancy<br />
adversely. Early detection of complications during pregnancy and their management are important<br />
components of the safe motherhood programme. Table 4.7 gives percentage of women who had<br />
live/still birth during three years preceding the survey by pregnancy complication and type of<br />
complication during pregnancy by selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir<br />
State. The percentage of women who experienced any pregnancy complication was 40 percent in<br />
the state – 36 percent in rural areas and 52 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who<br />
experienced any pregnancy complication was the highest (42 percent) for women aged 20-24 years,<br />
followed by 40 percent for women aged 25-34 years and the lowest (19 percent) for women aged<br />
40-44 years, while it was 39 percent for women aged 35-39 years. Coverage of such women was<br />
42 percent for women with one child ever born and women with three children ever born and<br />
57
Table 4.7 PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Percentage of women who had live/still births during three years preceding the survey by pregnancy complication and type of complication during pregnancy by some selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir State, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Percentage<br />
of women<br />
with any<br />
pregnancy<br />
complication<br />
Swelling of<br />
hands and<br />
feet<br />
Paleness<br />
Type of pregnancy complication;<br />
Visual<br />
disturbances Bleeding Convulsion<br />
Weak or no<br />
movement<br />
of foetus<br />
Abnormal<br />
position of<br />
foetus<br />
Other<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Age group (years)<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
42.1<br />
40.1<br />
40.4<br />
38.6<br />
(18.8)<br />
32.8<br />
29.4<br />
31.9<br />
29.1<br />
(15.6)<br />
13.9<br />
14.3<br />
7.9<br />
9.7<br />
(3.1)<br />
4.8<br />
3.8<br />
4.6<br />
2.9<br />
(0.0)<br />
13.1<br />
8.9<br />
8.2<br />
7.3<br />
(3.1)<br />
4.3<br />
2.3<br />
1.8<br />
3.3<br />
(0.0)<br />
9.3<br />
10.7<br />
16.5<br />
19.2<br />
(9.4)<br />
8.5<br />
7.7<br />
13.3<br />
14.1<br />
(9.4)<br />
1.6<br />
2.2<br />
0.9<br />
1.6<br />
(0.0)<br />
421<br />
1,131<br />
742<br />
266<br />
29<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
42.3<br />
38.4<br />
41.9<br />
37.1<br />
31.0<br />
26.3<br />
33.7<br />
33.7<br />
16.8<br />
10.6<br />
9.7<br />
7.6<br />
4.2<br />
4.6<br />
3.6<br />
3.5<br />
8.9<br />
10.2<br />
10.1<br />
6.6<br />
2.7<br />
2.7<br />
2.5<br />
2.3<br />
9.5<br />
10.3<br />
16.5<br />
20.4<br />
7.7<br />
8.4<br />
13.6<br />
13.6<br />
2.8<br />
1.7<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
36.3<br />
52.0<br />
28.5<br />
36.6<br />
10.7<br />
15.1<br />
4.3<br />
3.5<br />
8.4<br />
11.6<br />
1.9<br />
4.6<br />
12.5<br />
14.4<br />
9.8<br />
11.2<br />
1.7<br />
1.5<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
28.4<br />
39.7<br />
49.4<br />
25.6<br />
31.7<br />
31.0<br />
13.2<br />
9.7<br />
15.9<br />
4.4<br />
4.1<br />
3.7<br />
11.1<br />
8.8<br />
8.7<br />
2.3<br />
2.3<br />
3.4<br />
2.4<br />
16.8<br />
11.4<br />
3.1<br />
13.0<br />
8.1<br />
2.1<br />
1.6<br />
1.5<br />
453<br />
1,517<br />
625<br />
Received any ANC<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
42.9<br />
20.5<br />
32.6<br />
15.8<br />
12.9<br />
4.0<br />
4.5<br />
0.9<br />
9.8<br />
4.6<br />
2.7<br />
1.8<br />
14.4<br />
2.8<br />
11.3<br />
2.0<br />
1.7<br />
1.9<br />
2,274<br />
314<br />
Total<br />
40.1<br />
30.5<br />
11.8<br />
4.1<br />
9.1<br />
2.6<br />
13.0<br />
10.1<br />
1.7<br />
2,595<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity who were not shown separately. Total include 6 women in below 20 years of age who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included, 7 cases of missing in ANC received were not shown separately.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases .<br />
58
around 38 percent for women with two children ever born and women with four and more<br />
children ever born. The percentage of women who experienced any pregnancy complication<br />
was the highest (49 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (28 percent) for women<br />
with low SLI, while it was 40 percent for women with medium SLI. The percentage of women<br />
who experienced any pregnancy complication was 43 percent for women living in villages<br />
having health facility in the village as against over 20 percent for women having no health<br />
facility in the village. Main pregnancy complications reported were ‘swelling of hands and feet’<br />
(30 percent),‘paleness’ (12 percent),‘visual disturbances’ (four percent),‘bleeding’ (nine<br />
percent),‘ convulsion’ (three percent),‘weak or no movement of foetus’ (13 percent) and ‘abnormal<br />
position of foetus’ (10 percent). Figure 4.3 shows percentage of women with pregnancy<br />
complication and by symptoms.<br />
Figure 4.3<br />
Percentage of women with Pregnancy Complication and by Symptoms<br />
Any pregnancy complication<br />
40<br />
Swelling of hands and feet<br />
31<br />
Paleness<br />
12<br />
Visual disturbance<br />
4<br />
Bleeding<br />
9<br />
Convulsion<br />
3<br />
Weak or no movement of fetus<br />
13<br />
Abnormal postion of fetus<br />
10<br />
Other<br />
2<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />
Percent<br />
Women who reported at least one pregnancy related complication were asked whether<br />
they had consulted someone or had sought treatment for their problem and also the source of<br />
treatment. Table 4.8 gives percentage of women who had any pregnancy complications,<br />
sought treatment and source of treatment by residence and availability of health services in<br />
the village in the state. The percentage of women who had pregnancy complication and<br />
sought treatment was 81 percent in the state – 84 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in<br />
urban areas. Eighty-eight percent of women living in villages having health facility in the<br />
village as against 83 percent of women living in villages having no health facility sought<br />
treatment of pregnancy complication.<br />
Among the women who sought treatment for pregnancy complications from the government<br />
health facility was over 87 percent including primary health centre (13 percent) and sub-centre<br />
(over one percent), from private health facility (10 percent), from ISM facility (seven percent)<br />
and from other health facility (about two percent). In other words, six percent of the women<br />
sought treatment from more than one facility. Further, among women who sought treatment<br />
from the doctor was (96 percent), from ANM/Nurse/LHV (two percent) and less than one<br />
percent women received treatment from other.<br />
59
Table 4.8 TREATMENT FOR PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Percentage of women* who had any pregnancy complication, sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence<br />
and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Treatment and source<br />
Total<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility 5 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Percentage of women sought treatment who had any<br />
pregnancy complication<br />
81.0<br />
84.1<br />
74.3<br />
87.8<br />
82.9<br />
Number of women<br />
1,<strong>04</strong>0<br />
712<br />
328<br />
169<br />
543<br />
Percentage sought treatment at health facility<br />
Government health facility 1<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
87.5<br />
13.0<br />
1.5<br />
91.5<br />
16.1<br />
1.9<br />
77.6<br />
5.4<br />
0.7<br />
91.6<br />
33.3<br />
0.5<br />
91.5<br />
10.3<br />
2.3<br />
Private health facility 2<br />
10.0<br />
7.4<br />
16.5<br />
7.8<br />
7.2<br />
ISM 3 facility<br />
7.1<br />
4.4<br />
13.6<br />
3.5<br />
4.7<br />
Other<br />
1.6<br />
0.8<br />
3.5<br />
0.5<br />
0.9<br />
Percent distribution of women who obtained<br />
treatment from<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />
Other 4<br />
Missing<br />
95.8<br />
1.7<br />
0.4<br />
2.1<br />
95.2<br />
2.3<br />
0.5<br />
1.9<br />
97.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
2.5<br />
97.1<br />
1.6<br />
0.0<br />
1.4<br />
94.6<br />
2.6<br />
0.7<br />
2.1<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
843<br />
599<br />
244<br />
149<br />
450<br />
1<br />
Include municipal hospital, dispensary, urban health centre/urban health post/urban family welfare centre, community health<br />
centre/rural hospital, primary health centre and sub centre 2 Include private hospital/clinic and non-governmental organization/<br />
trust hospital 3 Either government or private Indian system of medicine 4 Other include Dai trained or untrained, other health<br />
professional and ISM practitioner 5<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital,<br />
government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />
4.8 Delivery Care<br />
4.8.1 Place of Delivery<br />
One of the important thrusts of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme is to encourage<br />
deliveries under proper hygienic conditions under the supervision of trained health professionals. The<br />
provision of delivery services in the government health institutions is one of the components of the<br />
RCH programme. For each live/still birth during three years preceding the survey, women were<br />
asked where (place) their children were born, who assisted during the deliveries in case of home<br />
deliveries, characteristics of delivery, and any problems that occurred during the delivery. Table<br />
4.9 gives percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years<br />
preceding the survey, by place of delivery according to selected background characteristics in the<br />
state. The percentage of institutional deliveries was over 70 percent in the state – 68 percent in<br />
rural areas and 78 percent in urban areas. Further, 56 percent deliveries were conducted at the<br />
government health facility and about 15 percent in private health facility, while 28 percent<br />
deliveries were home deliveries. The percentage of institutional deliveries rose from 44 percent<br />
in Round-I to 70 percent in Round-II.<br />
60
The percentage of institutional birth was 74 percent for women with one child ever born<br />
that decreases with increase in parity to 64 for women with four or more children ever born. The<br />
percentage of institutional deliveries was 57 percent for Hindu women as against 77 percent for<br />
Muslim women, while it was 90 percent for Sikh women. Further, percentage of institutional<br />
deliveries was the highest (77 percent) for OBC women, followed by 73 percent for other caste<br />
women and the lowest (48 percent) for scheduled tribe women. The percentage of institutional<br />
deliveries was the highest (81 percent) for women who had four or more antenatal check-up,<br />
followed by 62 percent for women who had three antenatal check-up and the lowest (24 percent)<br />
for women who had only one antenatal check-up, while it was 29 percent for women who no<br />
antenatal check-up. The percentage of institutional deliveries was 68 percent for normal deliveries<br />
as against 76 percent for assisted deliveries, while it was 98 percent for caesarean deliveries.<br />
Extent of institutional deliveries was 61 percent for women living in villages having no health<br />
facility in the village as against 70 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the<br />
village. The percentage of institutional deliveries was 73-74 percent for women with medium and<br />
high SLI as against 51 percent for women with low SLI. The percentage of institutional<br />
deliveries was the highest (74 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and<br />
the lowest (64 percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 71 percent for nonliterate<br />
women. Figure 4.4 shows place of delivery and assistance during delivery.<br />
Figure 4.4<br />
Place of Delivery and Assistance During Delivery<br />
Place of Delivery<br />
Assistance During Home Delivery<br />
Public<br />
56%<br />
Private<br />
15%<br />
Untraine<br />
d Dai<br />
27%<br />
Relative/<br />
friends<br />
22%<br />
None<br />
1%<br />
Doctor<br />
7%<br />
ANM/<br />
Nurse<br />
2%<br />
Other/<br />
missing<br />
1%<br />
Home<br />
28%<br />
TBA<br />
40%<br />
Note: Percentage may add more than 100.0<br />
due to rounding<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
The percentage of home deliveries was 28 percent in the state – 31 percent in rural areas<br />
and 21 percent in urban areas. The percentage of home deliveries increases with increase in the<br />
parity of women from 24 percent for women having one child ever born to 36 percent for women<br />
with four or more children ever born. The percentage of home deliveries was 35 percent for women<br />
61
Table 4.9 PLACE OF DELIVERY<br />
Percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding the survey, by place of delivery,<br />
according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristics<br />
<strong>Health</strong> institutions<br />
Public Private<br />
Home Other Missing<br />
Total<br />
percent<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Age group (in years)<br />
20-34<br />
35 and above<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
55.3<br />
60.6<br />
58.1<br />
54.8<br />
55.4<br />
54.7<br />
55.0<br />
58.6<br />
56.9<br />
55.1<br />
54.0<br />
46.0<br />
61.0<br />
66.2<br />
15.2<br />
10.2<br />
15.9<br />
16.4<br />
14.4<br />
8.9<br />
13.2<br />
19.3<br />
14.1<br />
9.3<br />
20.3<br />
11.5<br />
16.2<br />
23.7<br />
28.4<br />
28.0<br />
24.5<br />
27.2<br />
29.9<br />
36.0<br />
30.9<br />
20.6<br />
28.2<br />
34.7<br />
23.5<br />
40.3<br />
22.3<br />
10.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.4<br />
0.8<br />
0.2<br />
0.6<br />
1.3<br />
1.0<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
0.9<br />
0.9<br />
0.9<br />
0.0<br />
0.2<br />
0.5<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.9<br />
1.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
2,294<br />
295<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
1,456<br />
514<br />
625<br />
938<br />
1,566<br />
70<br />
Caste#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Number of antenatal checkups<br />
No check-up<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Delivery characteristics<br />
Normal<br />
Caesarean<br />
Assisted<br />
Availability of health facility 1<br />
in the village<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
51.2<br />
43.3<br />
52.0<br />
59.1<br />
47.9<br />
57.2<br />
58.3<br />
27.5<br />
(22.0)<br />
39.2<br />
53.1<br />
62.8<br />
53.6<br />
83.6<br />
61.8<br />
48.3<br />
57.0<br />
7.3<br />
5.2<br />
24.9<br />
14.1<br />
3.2<br />
16.2<br />
19.1<br />
1.8<br />
(2.4)<br />
6.1<br />
9.1<br />
18.4<br />
14.9<br />
14.3<br />
14.3<br />
12.4<br />
13.4<br />
39.9<br />
49.4<br />
23.0<br />
25.8<br />
47.6<br />
25.8<br />
20.8<br />
69.3<br />
(75.6)<br />
53.6<br />
37.8<br />
17.8<br />
30.8<br />
1.1<br />
23.9<br />
38.9<br />
28.5<br />
0.5<br />
2.0<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.0<br />
0.4<br />
(0.0)<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.9<br />
0.0<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
1.0<br />
0.4<br />
0.9<br />
1.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
0.7<br />
0.1<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
346<br />
159<br />
487<br />
1,575<br />
453<br />
1,517<br />
625<br />
314<br />
41<br />
151<br />
231<br />
1,852<br />
2,279<br />
174<br />
113<br />
448<br />
1,517<br />
Total<br />
55.9<br />
14.6<br />
28.4<br />
0.5<br />
0.6<br />
100.0<br />
2,595<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with zero parity, 1 with missing information on education, 7 on number of ANC visits and 30 on<br />
delivery characteristics who were not shown separately. Total includes 6 women below 20 years of age and 22 women with other<br />
religion who were not shown separately.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. @ Literate women with no years of schooling are also<br />
included. 1 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
who had studied for 0-9 years as against 23 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and<br />
above, while it was 28 percent for non-literate women. The percentage of home deliveries was 49<br />
percent for scheduled tribe women as against 40 percent for scheduled caste women and 23 percent<br />
for OBC women, while it was 26 percent for other caste women. The percentage of home deliveries was<br />
the highest (48 percent) for women with low SLI and the lowest (21 percent) for women with high<br />
62
SLI, while it was 26 percent for women with medium SLI. Further, percentage of home deliveries<br />
was the highest (76 percent) for women who had only one antenatal check-up, followed by 69 percent<br />
for women who had no antenatal and the lowest (18 percent) for women who had four or more<br />
antenatal check-up. The percentage of home deliveries was 39 percent for women living in villages<br />
having no health facility in the village as against 28 percent for women living in villages having<br />
health facility in the village.<br />
4.8.2 Assistance During Home Delivery<br />
Table 4.10 gives percent distribution of women who had given live/still birth during three years<br />
preceding the survey by assistance during home delivery and percentage of safe deliveries by<br />
selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. If more than one type of attendant<br />
assisted during the delivery, then only the most qualified person has been considered. The data<br />
shows that only seven percent home deliveries were attended by a doctor, three percent by ANM/<br />
Nurse/LHV, 40 percent by TBA, 27 percent by untrained dai and 22 percent by relatives/friends<br />
(Figure 4.4). The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was higher<br />
for women aged below 35 years than women aged 35 years and above. The health professionals<br />
attended 47 percent of home deliveries in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />
of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest (60 percent) for women<br />
with one child ever born, followed by 50 for women with three children ever born and the lowest<br />
(44 percent) for women with two children ever born and women four or more ever born children.<br />
The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was 54<br />
percent for Hindu women as against 44 percent for Muslim women. The percentage of home<br />
deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest (54 percent) for OBC women,<br />
followed by 51 percent of scheduled caste women and the lowest (37 percent) for scheduled tribe<br />
women. The percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was the highest<br />
(63 percent) for women who had two antenatal check-up, followed by 55 percent for women who<br />
three antenatal check-up and the lowest (44 percent) for women who had no antenatal check up.<br />
Further, percentage of home deliveries attended by trained health professionals was 28 percent<br />
for women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 54 percent for<br />
women living in villages having health facility in the village. The percentage of home deliveries<br />
attended by trained health professionals was the highest (57 percent) for women who had studied<br />
for 0-9 years and the lowest (46 percent) for non-literate women, while it was 51 percent for<br />
women who had studied for 10 years and above. Similarly, percentage of home deliveries<br />
attended by trained health professionals was the highest (59 percent) for women with high SLI<br />
and the lowest (45 percent) for women with low SLI, while it 49 percent for women with<br />
medium SLI.<br />
4.8.3 Delivery Assisted by Skilled Persons<br />
The percentage of safe deliveries was 73 percent in the state – 70 percent in rural areas and<br />
82 percent in urban areas. The percentage of safe deliveries was the highest (78 percent) for women<br />
with one child ever born, followed by 74 percent for women with two children ever born and the<br />
lowest (66 percent) for women with four or more children ever born. The percentage of safe<br />
deliveries was 61 percent for Hindu women as against 79 percent for Muslim women. The percentage<br />
of safe deliveries was the highest (78 percent) for OBC women, followed by 76 percent for other caste<br />
63
Table 4.10 ASSISTANCE DURING HOME DELIVERY AND SAFE DELIVERY<br />
Percent distribution of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding the survey, by assistance during home<br />
delivery, and percentage of safe delivery, according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristics<br />
Doctor<br />
Attendant assisting during home delivery 1<br />
ANM/<br />
Nurse/<br />
LHV TBA Untrained dai<br />
Relative/<br />
friends<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Percentage of<br />
safe 2 delivery<br />
Age group (in years)<br />
20-34<br />
35 and above<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
6.8<br />
6.2<br />
10.2<br />
7.2<br />
4.0<br />
4.3<br />
5.3<br />
13.4<br />
4.7<br />
12.3<br />
5.7<br />
8.6<br />
4.4<br />
2.7<br />
1.5<br />
4.6<br />
2.2<br />
2.1<br />
1.1<br />
1.9<br />
5.8<br />
2.2<br />
2.9<br />
3.5<br />
1.0<br />
4.1<br />
40.5<br />
37.8<br />
45.2<br />
34.3<br />
43.9<br />
38.4<br />
39.5<br />
43.4<br />
38.9<br />
42.0<br />
41.4<br />
44.4<br />
35.2<br />
29.0<br />
12.9<br />
24.1<br />
34.9<br />
28.0<br />
19.6<br />
27.8<br />
25.1<br />
24.7<br />
30.3<br />
31.0<br />
37.1<br />
17.4<br />
19.9<br />
41.0<br />
15.7<br />
21.3<br />
18.9<br />
35.3<br />
25.2<br />
8.1<br />
28.9<br />
10.6<br />
17.7<br />
7.7<br />
38.3<br />
652<br />
83<br />
196<br />
229<br />
155<br />
156<br />
607<br />
130<br />
411<br />
178<br />
147<br />
378<br />
350<br />
73.2<br />
73.0<br />
77.6<br />
73.8<br />
71.7<br />
65.6<br />
70.4<br />
81.8<br />
73.0<br />
69.6<br />
76.5<br />
61.4<br />
79.1<br />
Caste#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Number of antenatal check-ups<br />
No check-up<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Delivery characteristics<br />
Normal<br />
Assisted<br />
4.6<br />
6.5<br />
2.9<br />
8.6<br />
4.9<br />
6.2<br />
11.3<br />
6.1<br />
6.4<br />
1.8<br />
8.3<br />
6.0<br />
(14.7)<br />
1.1<br />
7.7<br />
3.5<br />
1.9<br />
3.0<br />
2.4<br />
2.7<br />
3.2<br />
3.5<br />
2.6<br />
2.0<br />
1.2<br />
(51.5)<br />
45.1<br />
23.1<br />
47.4<br />
39.5<br />
37.4<br />
40.1<br />
44.8<br />
34.4<br />
53.3<br />
50.9<br />
35.7<br />
41.7<br />
(11.8)<br />
41.8<br />
33.7<br />
17.5<br />
24.0<br />
31.8<br />
25.1<br />
26.4<br />
36.4<br />
32.8<br />
27.0<br />
21.1<br />
27.4<br />
(20.6)<br />
7.4<br />
28.9<br />
24.4<br />
25.5<br />
22.8<br />
25.3<br />
12.1<br />
19.5<br />
4.0<br />
17.8<br />
31.0<br />
23.2<br />
(1.5)<br />
138<br />
79<br />
112<br />
406<br />
216<br />
391<br />
130<br />
217<br />
81<br />
087<br />
330<br />
702<br />
27<br />
60.7<br />
55.5<br />
78.4<br />
75.9<br />
54.9<br />
75.7<br />
80.2<br />
35.8<br />
50.6<br />
63.8<br />
83.0<br />
70.7<br />
91.5<br />
Availability of health facility 3 in<br />
the village<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
3.7<br />
5.9<br />
1.7<br />
2.0<br />
22.9<br />
46.1<br />
23.2<br />
29.6<br />
48.4<br />
15.9<br />
174<br />
433<br />
62.8<br />
72.6<br />
Total<br />
6.7<br />
2.6<br />
Note1: Total includes 1 woman with zero parity, and 6 with missing information on delivery characteristics who were not shown<br />
separately.<br />
Note 2: Total includes 2 women below 20 years of age, 7 Sikh women 2 with other religion, 21 having 1 antenatal check-up and 2<br />
having caesarean delivery who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases<br />
1<br />
If the respondent mentioned more than one attendant, only the most qualified attendant is shown<br />
2<br />
Either institutional delivery or home delivery assisted by doctor/ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />
3<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />
dispensary within the village<br />
( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
40.2<br />
women and the lowest (55 percent) for scheduled tribe women. Further, percentage of safe deliveries<br />
was the lowest (36 percent) for women who had no antenatal check up, which increases with increase<br />
27.3<br />
22.2<br />
737<br />
73.1<br />
64
in the number of antenatal check-up and was the highest (83 percent) for four or more antenatal<br />
check-up. The percentage of safe deliveries was 71 percent for normal deliveries as against 91 percent<br />
for assisted deliveries. The percentage of safe deliveries was 63 percent for women living in villages<br />
having no health facility in the village as against 73 percent for women living in villages having<br />
health facility in the village.<br />
The percentage of safe deliveries was 76 percent for women who had studied for 10 years<br />
and above as against 70 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 73 percent for<br />
non-literate women. The percentage of safe deliveries was the highest (80 percent) for women with<br />
high SLI and the lowest (55 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was76 percent for women<br />
with medium SLI. Figure 4.5 shows delivery assisted by skilled person by background characteristics.<br />
Figure 4.5<br />
Delivery Assisted by Skilled Person by Background Characteristic<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 years@<br />
10 & above<br />
Caste<br />
Schedulde caste<br />
Schedulde tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of Living<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
56<br />
55<br />
61<br />
73<br />
70<br />
82<br />
73<br />
70<br />
77<br />
78<br />
76<br />
76<br />
80<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Percent<br />
4.9 Reasons for Not Going to <strong>Health</strong> Institutions for Delivery<br />
Table 4.11 gives percent distribution of women who had given last live/still birth at home during<br />
three years preceding the survey by the main reason for not going to health institution for delivery,<br />
according to residence and availability of health facility in the village in Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />
The main reason for not going to health institutions has been presented according to residence and<br />
availability of health facility in the village. One-third of the women stated that it was not<br />
considered necessary to deliver at the health institution. It is surprising to see that a higher<br />
proportion of urban women (39 percent) than rural women (32 percent) felt this way. Further, 42<br />
percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 28 percent of<br />
65
Table 4.11 REASONS FOR NOT GOING TO HEALTH INSTITUTIONS FOR DELIVERY<br />
Percent distribution of women who had given last live/still birth at home during three years preceding the survey by the main<br />
reason for not going to health institution for delivery, according to residence and availability of health facility in the village,<br />
Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Reason<br />
Total<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility 1 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Not Necessary<br />
Not customary<br />
Cost too much<br />
<strong>Health</strong> facility too far/ No transport<br />
Poor quality service<br />
No time to go<br />
Family did not allow<br />
Better care at home<br />
Lack of knowledge<br />
Other<br />
33.5<br />
3.6<br />
3.0<br />
10.7<br />
2.0<br />
4.5<br />
6.3<br />
17.1<br />
1.0<br />
1.7<br />
32.4<br />
3.6<br />
1.7<br />
12.9<br />
2.4<br />
4.1<br />
4.3<br />
16.1<br />
1.2<br />
2.0<br />
39.0<br />
3.6<br />
8.8<br />
0.2<br />
0.3<br />
6.8<br />
15.3<br />
21.7<br />
0.2<br />
0.2<br />
42.3<br />
2.8<br />
1.2<br />
12.2<br />
3.1<br />
2.1<br />
3.5<br />
22.7<br />
2.7<br />
0.0<br />
28.4<br />
3.9<br />
2.0<br />
13.2<br />
2.2<br />
4.8<br />
4.6<br />
13.4<br />
0.6<br />
2.8<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
737<br />
607<br />
130<br />
174<br />
433<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />
dispensary within the village.<br />
women living in villages having health facility in the village said that it was not considered<br />
necessary to deliver at the health facility. Only four percent of the women said that it was not<br />
customary to deliver at the health institution. Other factors reported for not going to health institution<br />
for delivery were, ‘cost too much’ (three percent), ‘health facility too far/no transport’ (11 percent),<br />
‘poor quality service’ (two percent), ‘no time to go’ (over four percent), ‘family did not allow’ (six<br />
percent), ‘better care at home’ (17 percent), and ‘lack of knowledge’ (one percent).<br />
Forty-two percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as<br />
against 28 percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village said that it<br />
was not considered necessary to deliver at the health institution. Similarly, 23 percent women<br />
living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 13 percent women living in<br />
villages having health facility in the village said ‘better care at home’.<br />
4.10 Delivery Characteristics by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 4.12 gives place of delivery, assistance during home delivery and percentage of safe<br />
deliveries by district in the state. The percentage of institutional delivery was the highest (95<br />
percent) in Kargil district, followed by 93 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (23 percent) in<br />
Poonch district. The percentage of institutional delivery was higher than that of the state (70<br />
percent) in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargi, Leh and Srinagar districts, while in the<br />
remaining seven districts it was lower than that of the state. Further, percentage of women who had<br />
delivery at home was the highest (76 percent) in Poonch district, followed by (71 percent) in<br />
Kathua district and the lowest (over four percent) in Kargil district, while it was 28 percent in the state.<br />
The percentage of home deliveries assisted by skilled persons was the highest (52 percent) in<br />
Leh district, followed by 38 percent in Poonch district and the lowest (zero percent) in Baramula<br />
and Kargil districts, while it was nine percent for the state. The percentage of safe deliveries was<br />
the highest (95 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 94 percent in Leh district and the lowest<br />
(30 percent) in Kathua district, while it was 73 percent for the state. In one-half of the districts of<br />
66
Table 4.12 DELIVERY CHARACTERISTICS BY DISTRICT<br />
Place of delivery, assistance during home deliveries, and percentage of safe deliveries by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Percentage of women who<br />
had institutional delivery<br />
81.3<br />
92.9<br />
91.0<br />
34.0<br />
72.7<br />
Percentage of women who<br />
had delivery at home<br />
18.7<br />
7.1<br />
9.0<br />
64.4<br />
26.0<br />
Home delivery assisted<br />
by skilled 1 persons<br />
4.9<br />
(0.0)<br />
0.0<br />
28.4<br />
11.9<br />
Percentage of<br />
safe 2 delivery<br />
82.2<br />
92.9<br />
91.0<br />
52.3<br />
75.8<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
94.6<br />
26.8<br />
63.0<br />
89.6<br />
64.5<br />
4.4<br />
71.0<br />
36.2<br />
7.7<br />
34.9<br />
(0.0)<br />
4.4<br />
5.1<br />
(51.9)<br />
5.3<br />
94.6<br />
29.9<br />
64.9<br />
93.6<br />
66.4<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
23.2<br />
30.2<br />
72.5<br />
50.1<br />
75.8<br />
65.4<br />
24.9<br />
42.3<br />
38.5<br />
7.3<br />
(10.8)<br />
22.2<br />
52.4<br />
35.0<br />
75.2<br />
59.5<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
70.5<br />
*Table includes last live/still birth since 1-1-1999/1-1-2001.<br />
1<br />
Includes Doctor/ANM/Nurse. 2 Either institutional delivery or home delivery assisted by skilled person. ( ) Based on less<br />
number of cases.<br />
the state three-fourth or higher percentage of deliveries were conducted by skilled professionals,<br />
while in the remaining one-half districts of the state it was below 75 percent.<br />
4.11 Complications During Delivery<br />
Table 4.13 gives percentage of women who had given last live/still birth during three years<br />
preceding the survey by delivery complication, according to selected characteristics in the state.<br />
The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was 65 percent in the state – 65<br />
percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who had any<br />
delivery complication was 64 percent for women aged 20–34 years as against 73 percent for<br />
women aged 35 years and above. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication<br />
was the highest (71 percent) for women with four or more children ever born, followed by 70<br />
percent for women with three children ever born and the lowest (59 percent) for women with one<br />
child ever born. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was the highest<br />
(71 percent) for women who received four or more antenatal check-up, followed by 60 percent<br />
for women who received three antenatal check-up and the lowest (41 percent) for women who<br />
had no antenatal check-up. The percentage of women who had any delivery complication was the<br />
highest (88 percent) for caesarean deliveries and the lowest (35 percent) for assisted deliveries, while<br />
it was 65 percent for normal deliveries. Further, percentage of women who had any delivery<br />
complication was 73 percent for deliveries conducted in government health facilities as against<br />
85 percent for deliveries conducted in private health facilities, while it was 37 percent for home<br />
deliveries. Major problems reported were ‘premature labour’ (31 percent),‘excessive bleeding’<br />
(24 percent),‘prolonged labour’ (29 percent),‘obstructed labour’ (13 percent) and ‘breech presentation’<br />
(six percent), Figure 4.6 shows percentage of women with delivery complication and by symptoms.<br />
28.4<br />
4.12 Post Delivery Complications and Treatment<br />
Table 4.14 gives percentage of women who had given live/still births during three years preceding<br />
9.3<br />
73.1<br />
67
Table 4.13 DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Percentage of women who had given last live/still births during three years preceding the survey by delivery complication, according<br />
to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristics<br />
Any delivery<br />
complication<br />
Premature<br />
labour<br />
Excessive<br />
bleeding<br />
Type of delivery complication;<br />
Prolonged<br />
labour<br />
Obstructed<br />
labour<br />
Breech<br />
presentation<br />
Other<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Age group (in years)<br />
20-34<br />
35 and above<br />
63.6<br />
72.7<br />
30.7<br />
34.5<br />
25.2<br />
19.9<br />
27.0<br />
41.1<br />
13.2<br />
10.6<br />
6.1<br />
6.2<br />
2.6<br />
3.1<br />
2,294<br />
295<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
59.0<br />
63.6<br />
69.8<br />
70.6<br />
32.5<br />
30.3<br />
30.9<br />
30.3<br />
26.5<br />
25.0<br />
23.2<br />
21.6<br />
19.7<br />
24.5<br />
36.3<br />
44.0<br />
14.2<br />
13.6<br />
11.4<br />
10.9<br />
5.5<br />
6.3<br />
5.5<br />
7.7<br />
1.5<br />
3.9<br />
2.2<br />
2.9<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
65.2<br />
62.6<br />
32.6<br />
26.4<br />
24.9<br />
23.3<br />
30.1<br />
23.9<br />
12.6<br />
13.7<br />
6.9<br />
3.7<br />
2.5<br />
3.1<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
Number of antenatal checkups<br />
No check-up<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
40.8<br />
(43.9)<br />
42.8<br />
60.1<br />
71.0<br />
26.0<br />
(31.7)<br />
30.0<br />
41.2<br />
30.7<br />
17.4<br />
(14.6)<br />
20.3<br />
33.6<br />
25.3<br />
12.2<br />
(12.2)<br />
8.4<br />
19.6<br />
34.5<br />
5.3<br />
(4.9)<br />
14.7<br />
18.7<br />
13.6<br />
4.9<br />
(4.9)<br />
5.4<br />
7.2<br />
6.4<br />
2.4<br />
(7.3)<br />
1.2<br />
1.5<br />
2.8<br />
314<br />
41<br />
151<br />
231<br />
1,852<br />
Delivery characteristics<br />
Normal<br />
Caesarean<br />
Assisted<br />
64.9<br />
87.7<br />
35.5<br />
30.9<br />
43.6<br />
21.3<br />
22.8<br />
55.6<br />
18.0<br />
28.0<br />
48.7<br />
15.7<br />
12.2<br />
26.5<br />
8.5<br />
5.6<br />
14.5<br />
5.1<br />
1.7<br />
9.4<br />
12.1<br />
2,279<br />
174<br />
113<br />
Place of delivery<br />
Government sector<br />
Private sector<br />
Home<br />
73.2<br />
85.3<br />
37.4<br />
37.6<br />
22.2<br />
22.7<br />
30.7<br />
19.0<br />
15.4<br />
30.9<br />
53.7<br />
11.4<br />
15.1<br />
15.3<br />
7.5<br />
7.3<br />
3.9<br />
5.0<br />
3.8<br />
0.0<br />
1.8<br />
1,450<br />
380<br />
737<br />
Total<br />
64.6<br />
31.1<br />
24.5<br />
Note1: Total include 2 women with zero parity, 7 with missing information on number of ANC visits, 30 on delivery characteristics and<br />
15 on place of delivery who were not shown separately.<br />
Note2: Total include 6 women below 20 years of age and 14 in other place of delivery who were not shown separately.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
28.6<br />
12.9<br />
6.1<br />
2.7<br />
2,595<br />
Figure 4.6<br />
Percentage of women with Delivery Complication and by Symptoms<br />
Any Delivery complication<br />
56<br />
Premature labor<br />
Excessive bleeding<br />
Prolnged labor<br />
15<br />
15<br />
16<br />
Obstructed labor<br />
32<br />
Breech presentation<br />
Other<br />
5<br />
6<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Percent<br />
68
Table 4.14 POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Percentage of women who had given last live/still births during three years preceding the survey by post delivery complication,<br />
according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristics<br />
Age group (in years)<br />
20-34<br />
35 and above<br />
Children ever born<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Delivery<br />
characteristics<br />
Normal<br />
Caesarean<br />
Assisted<br />
Place of delivery<br />
Government sector<br />
Private sector<br />
Home<br />
Assistance during<br />
home delivery<br />
Doctor<br />
TBA<br />
Untrained dai<br />
Relative/friends<br />
Total<br />
Any post<br />
delivery<br />
complication<br />
47.6<br />
45.6<br />
49.3<br />
45.3<br />
47.4<br />
47.4<br />
45.8<br />
51.9<br />
44.9<br />
78.0<br />
47.9<br />
57.0<br />
41.3<br />
31.8<br />
13.6<br />
29.9<br />
30.2<br />
42.9<br />
47.3<br />
High<br />
fever<br />
30.3<br />
31.9<br />
30.0<br />
25.2<br />
33.6<br />
37.7<br />
32.0<br />
25.7<br />
29.6<br />
46.7<br />
26.9<br />
38.7<br />
21.4<br />
19.4<br />
7.0<br />
14.5<br />
14.8<br />
37.8<br />
30.4<br />
Lower<br />
abdominal<br />
pain<br />
31.8<br />
34.3<br />
30.1<br />
29.8<br />
34.2<br />
37.8<br />
32.6<br />
30.5<br />
30.2<br />
59.2<br />
21.8<br />
41.1<br />
24.8<br />
18.3<br />
7.0<br />
14.9<br />
19.2<br />
24.9<br />
32.1<br />
Type of post delivery complication;<br />
Foul smelling<br />
vaginal<br />
discharge<br />
3.9<br />
2.6<br />
3.5<br />
3.6<br />
4.8<br />
3.2<br />
3.6<br />
4.2<br />
2.8<br />
11.2<br />
11.0<br />
5.2<br />
1.9<br />
1.8<br />
0.0<br />
0.8<br />
3.5<br />
0.3<br />
3.7<br />
Excessive<br />
bleeding<br />
Convulsion<br />
Severe<br />
headache<br />
Other<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Note: Total include 2 women with zero parity and 30 women with missing information on delivery characteristics, 15 on place of<br />
delivery, 7 on assistance during home delivery who were not shown separately. Total include 6 women below 20 years of age, 14<br />
in other place of delivery and 19 assisted by ANM/Nurse/LHV during home delivery who were not shown separately.<br />
the survey by post delivery complication, according to selected background characteristics in the<br />
state. The percentage of women who had any post delivery complications was 47 percent in the<br />
state – 46 percent in rural areas and 52 percent in urban areas. Forty-eight percent of the women<br />
aged 20-34 years as against 46 percent women aged 35 years and above had post-delivery<br />
complication. Further, 49 percent of women with one child ever born as against 45 percent<br />
women with two children ever born had post-delivery complication, while it was 47 percent for<br />
women with three or more children ever born. The percentage of women who had any post<br />
delivery complication was the highest (78 percent) for caesarean deliveries and the lowest (45<br />
percent) for normal deliveries, while it was 48 percent for assisted deliveries. The percentage of<br />
women who had any post-delivery complication was 57 percent for deliveries conducted at the<br />
government health facility as against 41 percent for deliveries conducted at the private health<br />
facility, while it was 32 percent for home deliveries. The proportion of post-delivery complication<br />
was 43 percent for deliveries conducted by friends/relatives as against 14 percent for deliveries<br />
conducted by doctors, while it was 30 percent for deliveries conducted by TBA and untrained dai.<br />
13.0<br />
10.2<br />
14.0<br />
11.8<br />
12.4<br />
12.1<br />
11.8<br />
15.1<br />
11.3<br />
28.3<br />
16.8<br />
15.4<br />
14.1<br />
6.8<br />
9.8<br />
5.8<br />
2.2<br />
12.7<br />
12.6<br />
3.0<br />
4.3<br />
3.2<br />
3.4<br />
2.9<br />
3.0<br />
2.7<br />
4.6<br />
1.9<br />
15.2<br />
10.0<br />
4.3<br />
1.7<br />
1.5<br />
1.8<br />
0.7<br />
1.7<br />
1.2<br />
3.2<br />
26.3<br />
29.4<br />
23.4<br />
24.8<br />
28.0<br />
34.7<br />
26.1<br />
28.1<br />
26.3<br />
34.9<br />
26.4<br />
31.9<br />
23.9<br />
18.2<br />
6.9<br />
18.0<br />
10.8<br />
32.8<br />
26.6<br />
3.6<br />
3.8<br />
3.9<br />
3.0<br />
3.1<br />
4.7<br />
3.6<br />
3.6<br />
2.9<br />
9.6<br />
9.2<br />
4.3<br />
4.6<br />
1.6<br />
4.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
1.8<br />
3.6<br />
2,294<br />
295<br />
801<br />
842<br />
518<br />
432<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
2,279<br />
174<br />
113<br />
1,450<br />
380<br />
737<br />
Main post-delivery complications were ‘high fever’ (30 percent), ‘lower abdominal pain’ (32<br />
50<br />
296<br />
201<br />
164<br />
2,595<br />
69
percent),‘foul smelling vaginal discharge’ (four percent),‘excessive bleeding’ (13 percent),<br />
‘convulsion’ (three percent) and ‘severe head ache’ (27 percent). Figure 4.7 shows percentage of<br />
women with post-delivery complication and by symptoms.<br />
Figure 4.7<br />
Percentage of women with Post Delivery Complication<br />
and by Symptoms<br />
Any Post Delivery complication<br />
47<br />
High fever<br />
Lower abdominal pain<br />
30<br />
32<br />
Foul smelling vaginal discharge<br />
4<br />
Excessive bleeding<br />
13<br />
Convulsion<br />
3<br />
Severe headache<br />
27<br />
Other<br />
4<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50<br />
Percent<br />
Table 4.15 shows the percentage of women who had last live/still births during three<br />
years preceding the survey and who had any post delivery complication, sought treatment for the<br />
problems and source of treatment according to residence and availability of health facility in the<br />
village. Eighty–three percent of women who had any post delivery complication sought treatment of<br />
their health problem in the state – 84 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas.<br />
Further, percentage of women who had any post delivery complication sought treatment of their<br />
health problem was 81 percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village<br />
as against 86 percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />
The percentage of women who sought treatment of post delivery complications from the<br />
government health facility was 86 percent, including primary health centre (12 percent) and subcentre<br />
(over two percent), over 13 percent from private health facility, five percent from ISM<br />
facility and three percent from other health facilities. However, 16 percent of the women living<br />
in villages having no health facility in the village as against nine percent of the women living in<br />
villages having health facility in the village sought treatment from private health facility. Over six<br />
percent women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against three percent<br />
women living in villages having health facility in the village sought from ISM health facility. In<br />
other words, around seven percent of the women sought treatment of their post delivery complications<br />
from more than one health facility. Further, among women who sought treatment from the doctor<br />
was 95 percent, from ANM/Nurse/LHV four percent, while over one percent women received treatment<br />
from other health professionals.<br />
70
Table 4.15 TREATMENT FOR POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Percentage of women who had last live/still births during three years preceding the survey and who had any post delivery<br />
complication, sought treatment for the problems, and source of treatment according to residence and availability of health<br />
facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Treatment and source<br />
Total<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility 5 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Percentage of women sought treatment who had<br />
any post delivery complication<br />
83.1<br />
84.5<br />
79.1<br />
81.1<br />
85.6<br />
Number of women<br />
1,228<br />
900<br />
327<br />
224<br />
676<br />
Percentage sought treatment at health facility<br />
Government health facility 1<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
86.1<br />
12.0<br />
2.5<br />
87.8<br />
13.8<br />
3.1<br />
81.0<br />
6.7<br />
0.8<br />
83.8<br />
28.6<br />
3.1<br />
89.0<br />
9.2<br />
3.1<br />
Private health facility 2<br />
13.5<br />
11.1<br />
20.5<br />
16.4<br />
9.4<br />
ISM 3 facility<br />
4.7<br />
3.8<br />
7.4<br />
6.5<br />
3.0<br />
Other<br />
3.0<br />
3.7<br />
1.1<br />
6.6<br />
2.7<br />
Percent distribution of women who obtained<br />
treatment from<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />
Other health professionals 4<br />
94.6<br />
4.2<br />
1.2<br />
95.7<br />
2.7<br />
1.6<br />
91.4<br />
8.6<br />
0.0<br />
97.1<br />
0.4<br />
2.5<br />
95.3<br />
3.4<br />
1.3<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
1,020<br />
761<br />
259<br />
182<br />
579<br />
1<br />
Include municipal hospital, dispensary, urban health centre/urban health post/urban family welfare centre, community<br />
health centre/rural hospital, primary health centre and sub centre 2 Include private hospital/clinic and non-governmental<br />
organization/ trust hospital. 3 4<br />
Either government or private Indian system of medicine Other health professionals include<br />
Dai (trained or untrained), relative/friends and ISM practitioner. 5 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community<br />
health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village<br />
4.13 Obstetric Morbidity by <strong>District</strong><br />
The extent of health problems/ complications women suffer during pregnancy, delivery and post<br />
delivery period indicates the state of obstetric morbidity. Table 4.16 gives extent of pregnancy,<br />
delivery and post-delivery complications and treatment seeking behaviour by district in Jammu<br />
& Kashmir State. The percentage of women who had complication during pregnancy was the<br />
highest (58 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 56 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />
(four percent) in Kathua district, while it was 40 percent for the state. The percentage of women<br />
who sought treatment of pregnancy complication was the highest (98 percent) in Baramula district,<br />
followed by 94 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (10 percent) in Kathua district, while it<br />
was 81 percent for the state. The percentage of women who had delivery complication was the highest<br />
(99.7 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 91 percent in Anantnag and Srinagar districts<br />
and the lowest (14 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 65 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />
women who had post delivery complication was the highest (87 percent) in Kargil district,<br />
followed by 82 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (over five percent) in Kathua district,<br />
while it was 47 percent for the state. Further, percentage of women who sought treatment for post<br />
delivery complication was the highest (95 percent) in Kupwara and Pulwama districts, followed by 90<br />
percent in Anantnag district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district, while it was 83 percent for<br />
the state.<br />
71
Table 4.16 PREGNANCY, DELIVERY AND POST DELIVERY COMPLICATIONS<br />
Extent of pregnancy, delivery and post delivery complications and treatment seeking behaviour by districts, Jammu &<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Percentage of women 1<br />
Who had<br />
complication<br />
during pregnancy<br />
Sought 2 treatment<br />
for pregnancy<br />
complication<br />
Who had<br />
delivery<br />
complication<br />
Who had post<br />
delivery<br />
complication<br />
Sought 3 treatment for<br />
post delivery<br />
complication<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
56.5<br />
16.9<br />
44.6<br />
34.8<br />
48.8<br />
74.8<br />
(90.4)<br />
98.1<br />
44.2<br />
82.2<br />
90.7<br />
50.9<br />
99.7<br />
44.1<br />
49.7<br />
82.5<br />
20.7<br />
55.4<br />
53.3<br />
44.9<br />
90.4<br />
87.4<br />
84.0<br />
71.4<br />
81.7<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
57.7<br />
3.6<br />
32.3<br />
40.1<br />
35.1<br />
94.2<br />
(76.1)<br />
88.1<br />
(78.9)<br />
89.2<br />
88.3<br />
22.3<br />
42.9<br />
81.9<br />
42.9<br />
86.6<br />
5.4<br />
41.7<br />
64.8<br />
43.7<br />
70.2<br />
(75.0)<br />
95.4<br />
65.9<br />
95.1<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
10.3<br />
19.7<br />
37.7<br />
28.1<br />
(10.1)<br />
(66.5)<br />
(82.8)<br />
75.8<br />
14.3<br />
23.1<br />
90.6<br />
39.3<br />
9.5<br />
39.3<br />
41.1<br />
27.7<br />
(0.0)<br />
67.4<br />
(68.2)<br />
67.3<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
40.1<br />
81.0<br />
64.6<br />
47.3<br />
83.1<br />
1<br />
Women who had last live/still birth during three years preceding the survey. 2 Women who reported at least one<br />
complication of pregnancy. 3 Women who reported at least one post delivery complication. ( ) Based on less number of<br />
cases.<br />
72
Map-3<br />
Percentage of Women Received Three or More Antenatal Check-Up<br />
73
Map 4:<br />
Percentage of Delivery Attended by Skilled Person<br />
74
CHAPTER V<br />
CHILD CARE AND IMMUNIZATION<br />
Child health services under the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> (RCH) programme include health<br />
education to mothers on breast-feeding and services for immunization, Vitamin-A supplements<br />
and Iron prophylaxis, treatment of diarrhoea and Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs). The<br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>Household</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLHS) covered all the currently married women whose last<br />
surviving child was born during three years preceding the survey, and information on those<br />
breastfeeding currently and duration of breastfeeding. They were also asked about their awareness of<br />
diarrhoea management and danger signs of pneumonia and practices followed in case of episodes<br />
of diarrhoea and ARI among the children. Data on immunization, administering Vitamin-A<br />
supplements and Iron prophylaxis was collected for the last two living children born after<br />
January 1, 1999/2001. This chapter presents an analysis of the data collected on the above aspects.<br />
5.1 Breastfeeding<br />
Educating mothers on correct breastfeeding practices and child nutrition is one of the components of<br />
the RCH programme. Infant feeding practices have significant effects on the health of both<br />
mothers and children. Mothers are affected through the influences of breastfeeding on the period<br />
of postpartum infertility, and hence on fertility levels and the length of birth intervals. These<br />
effects vary according to the duration and intensity of breastfeeding. Proper infant feeding, starting<br />
from the time of birth, is important for the physical and mental development of the child. Breastfeeding<br />
improves the nutritional status of young children and reduces morbidity and mortality.<br />
Breast milk not only provides important nutrients, but also protects the child against infection.<br />
The timing and type of supplementary foods introduced in an infant’s diet have significant<br />
effects on the child’s nutritional status.<br />
As recommended by the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization (WHO), breastfeeding should be<br />
initiated immediately after birth and should be continued upto a minimum of six months. The<br />
WHO also suggests that the yellowish milk, known as colostrums, should be given to the baby<br />
because it provides protection against certain infections. Afterwards, it has to be supplemented with<br />
other semi-solid and solid foods at the proper time intervals.<br />
Table 5.1 gives percentage of children under age 3 whose mother started breastfeeding<br />
within two hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day of birth, and percentage<br />
whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding by selected<br />
background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Fifty-nine percent children were breastfed<br />
within two hours of birth and 87 percent were breastfed within one day of birth, while 11 percent<br />
children were breastfed after one day of birth. As shown in Figure 5.1, 28 percent children were<br />
breastfed within one day of birth but after two hours of birth, nine percent were breastfed 1-3 days of<br />
birth and one percent after three days, while two percent children were never breastfed. Eighty-eight<br />
percent of children in rural areas as against 83 percent children in urban areas were breastfed<br />
with one day of birth. Over 78 percent of Hindu children as against 93 percent of Muslim children<br />
were breastfed within one day of birth, while it was 94 percent for Sikh children. The percentage<br />
of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (89 percent) for other caste children,<br />
followed by 86 percent for OBC children and the lowest (71 percent) for scheduled tribe children.
Table 5.1 INITIATION OF BREASTFEEDING<br />
Percentage of children under age 3 whose mother started breastfeeding within two hours of births, within one day of birth, and<br />
after one day of birth and percentage whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir , <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Percentage started breastfeeding<br />
Within two hours of<br />
birth<br />
62.5<br />
46.5<br />
Within one<br />
day of birth 1<br />
88.4<br />
82.9<br />
After one day of<br />
birth<br />
10.5<br />
11.8<br />
Percentage whose<br />
mother squeezed first<br />
milk from breast<br />
75.6<br />
63.0<br />
Number<br />
of children<br />
1,492<br />
491<br />
Mother’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
70.5<br />
46.9<br />
42.9<br />
92.2<br />
82.0<br />
80.3<br />
7.0<br />
13.6<br />
16.5<br />
73.0<br />
73.0<br />
71.1<br />
1,064<br />
400<br />
518<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
33.5<br />
76.2<br />
53.1<br />
78.5<br />
92.6<br />
94.0<br />
16.9<br />
6.7<br />
6.0<br />
67.5<br />
76.4<br />
70.0<br />
770<br />
1,141<br />
57<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
36.7<br />
36.6<br />
74.7<br />
60.2<br />
84.3<br />
71.0<br />
86.5<br />
89.0<br />
15.1<br />
22.3<br />
10.6<br />
9.1<br />
72.2<br />
32.1<br />
70.7<br />
76.3<br />
282<br />
105<br />
354<br />
1,225<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
51.5<br />
65.9<br />
47.0<br />
84.1<br />
90.7<br />
80.8<br />
14.2<br />
8.6<br />
13.5<br />
61.0<br />
77.8<br />
68.6<br />
344<br />
1,131<br />
508<br />
Total<br />
58.6<br />
87.0<br />
10.8<br />
72.5<br />
1,983<br />
Note-1: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey. Total includes 1 child with missing<br />
information on mother’s education who were not shown separately. Note-2: Total includes 15 children in other religion who were<br />
not shown separately. 1 Includes children whose mother started breastfeeding within two hours of births. @ Literate mother with no<br />
years of schooling are included. #Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Initiation of Breastfeeding<br />
1-3 days<br />
9%<br />
After 3 days<br />
1%<br />
Never<br />
2%<br />
After 2 hours, but<br />
same day<br />
28%<br />
Within 2 hours<br />
59%<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<br />
Further, percentage of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (92 percent) for<br />
children having non-literate mother and the lowest (80 percent) for children whose mother had<br />
studied for 10 years and above, while it was 82 percent for the children whose mother had studied<br />
for 0-9 years. The percentage of children breastfed within one day of birth was the highest (91 percent)<br />
76
for children with medium SLI and the lowest (81 percent) for children with high SLI, while it was<br />
84 percent for children with low SLI.<br />
The percentage of children women who squeezed out first breast-milk was 72 percent in the<br />
state – 76 percent in rural areas and 63 percent in urban areas. Two-third of Hindu women as against<br />
three-fourth of Muslim women squeezed out first breast-milk and it was 70 percent for Sikh women.<br />
The percentage of women who squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (76 percent) for other<br />
caste women, followed by 72 percent for scheduled caste women and the lowest (32 percent) for<br />
scheduled tribe women, while it was 71 percent for OBC women. The percentage of women who<br />
squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (78 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />
lowest (61 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 69 percent for women with high SLI.<br />
The custom of squeezing the first breast milk before breastfeeding is widely practised in<br />
every community/group. Women who had last live/still births during three years preceding the<br />
survey were asked ‘Are you currently breast-feeding the child? If so, ‘How many months did you<br />
breastfed the child exclusively? The exclusive breastfeeding means breastfeeding the child without<br />
giving him/her anything including water. Table 5.2 gives percentage of children under age 3 years by<br />
exclusive breastfeeding and child’s age in month in the state. Over 58 percent children under four<br />
months of age were exclusively breastfed. The percentage of children exclusively breastfed drops<br />
steadily from 71 percent for children under 2 months of age to 51 percent for children aged 6-7<br />
months, while 88 percent of the children below six months were breastfed exclusively for four months.<br />
Further, 63 percent of the children aged below four months were breastfed exclusively. The percentage<br />
of children aged 4-6 months who received exclusive breastfeeding was 48 percent, while 91 percent of<br />
them were breastfed exclusively for at least four months. Similarly, percentage of children aged 7-9<br />
months who received exclusive breastfeeding was 32 percent, while 96 percent children received<br />
exclusive breastfeeding for at least four months and 77 percent for at least six months.<br />
Table 5.2 EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING BY CHILD’S AGE<br />
Percentage of children under age 3 years by exclusive breastfeeding and child’s age in month, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Age in months<br />
Below 2<br />
2-3<br />
4-5<br />
6-7<br />
8-9<br />
10-11<br />
12-13<br />
14-15<br />
16-17<br />
18-19<br />
20-21<br />
22-23<br />
24-25<br />
26-27<br />
28-29<br />
30-31<br />
32-33<br />
34-35<br />
Status of exclusive breastfeeding<br />
Exclusive breastfeeding At least 4 months At least 6 months<br />
71.1<br />
58.5<br />
45.6<br />
51.0<br />
23.4<br />
23.1<br />
25.1<br />
25.4<br />
22.6<br />
9.9<br />
9.9<br />
17.1<br />
12.8<br />
14.3<br />
6.8<br />
11.3<br />
7.4<br />
(7.3)<br />
*<br />
*<br />
88.3<br />
97.4<br />
96.0<br />
88.1<br />
90.3<br />
89.3<br />
95.3<br />
92.3<br />
88.6<br />
81.6<br />
81.7<br />
94.2<br />
98.8<br />
96.4<br />
90.0<br />
(80.0)<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
77.2<br />
76.3<br />
57.9<br />
68.5<br />
70.6<br />
74.6<br />
72.4<br />
58.6<br />
56.6<br />
65.4<br />
71.4<br />
81.2<br />
80.6<br />
74.4<br />
(58.2)<br />
Number of<br />
children<br />
64<br />
119<br />
127<br />
103<br />
102<br />
70<br />
110<br />
152<br />
95<br />
120<br />
62<br />
71<br />
91<br />
162<br />
202<br />
200<br />
84<br />
48<br />
Below 4 months<br />
4-6 months<br />
7-9 Months<br />
62.9<br />
47.6<br />
32.3<br />
Note: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
*<br />
91.5<br />
95.7<br />
*<br />
*<br />
77.3<br />
182<br />
176<br />
156<br />
77
5.1.1 Breastfeeding by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 5.3 gives percentage of children under age 3 years who started breastfeeding within two<br />
hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day of birth, percentage whose mother<br />
squeezed the first breast-milk before breastfeeding and percentage of children who were<br />
exclusively breastfed by district in the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed within<br />
two hours of birth was the highest (97 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts, followed by<br />
72 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (eight percent) in Udhampur district, while it was 59<br />
percent for the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed within one day of birth was<br />
the highest (98 percent) in Anantnag and Baramula districts, followed by 92 percent in Badgam,<br />
Kargil, Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (39 percent) in Poonch district, while it<br />
was 87 percent for the state. The percentage of children who were breastfed after one day of birth<br />
was the highest (61 percent) in Poonch district, followed by 48 percent in Leh district and the lowest<br />
(two percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 11 percent for the state.<br />
The percentage of children whose mother squeezed out first breast-milk was the highest (100<br />
percent) in Baramula district, followed by 96 percent in Kupwara district and the lowest (three<br />
percent) in Doda district, while it was 72 percent for the state. The percentage of children who<br />
received exclusive breastfeeding was the highest (100 percent) in Srinagar and Baramula<br />
districts, followed by 99 percent in Badgam district and the lowest (17 percent) in Doda district,<br />
while it was 72 percent for the state.<br />
Table 5.3 BREASTFEEDING BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of children under age 3 who started breastfeeding within two hours of birth, within one day of birth and after one day<br />
of birth, percentage whose mother squeezed the first milk from her breast before breastfeeding and percentage of children who<br />
exclusively breastfeed by <strong>District</strong>, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Within two hours of<br />
birth<br />
Percentage started breastfeeding<br />
Within one day<br />
of birth 1<br />
After one day<br />
of birth<br />
Percentage whose<br />
mother squeezed first<br />
milk from breast<br />
Exclusive<br />
breastfeeding 2<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
97.5<br />
71.8<br />
97.2<br />
37.5<br />
52.8<br />
98.1<br />
91.5<br />
97.6<br />
71.7<br />
88.3<br />
1.9<br />
8.5<br />
2.4<br />
18.3<br />
8.0<br />
59.5<br />
55.6<br />
100.0<br />
2.9<br />
78.5<br />
86.5<br />
99.3<br />
99.7<br />
16.8<br />
43.2<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
52.7<br />
9.7<br />
34.2<br />
16.5<br />
35.9<br />
92.3<br />
71.7<br />
91.7<br />
52.4<br />
92.2<br />
7.7<br />
27.5<br />
7.7<br />
47.6<br />
7.3<br />
67.8<br />
64.2<br />
96.2<br />
43.4<br />
94.7<br />
87.3<br />
46.6<br />
88.2<br />
85.2<br />
87.0<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
17.3<br />
21.6<br />
43.1<br />
8.2<br />
38.9<br />
62.4<br />
78.7<br />
70.9<br />
61.1<br />
35.5<br />
21.3<br />
20.5<br />
59.5<br />
54.9<br />
84.8<br />
52.6<br />
97.4<br />
85.4<br />
100.0<br />
41.1<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
58.6<br />
87.0<br />
Note: Table based on youngest living child born during the three years preceding the survey<br />
1<br />
Includes children who started breastfeeding within two hours of births. 2 Based on youngest children age 6 months and older at<br />
the time of survey and breastfeed exclusively 6 months or more as mother reported.<br />
10.8<br />
72.5<br />
72.0<br />
5.2 Immunization of Children<br />
The immunization of children against six serious but preventable diseases namely, tuberculosis,<br />
78
diphtheria, pertusis, poliomyelitis and measles is the main component of the child survival<br />
programme. As part of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Policy, the <strong>National</strong> Immunization Programme is<br />
being implemented on a priority basis. The Government of India initiated the Expanded Programme on<br />
Immunization (EPI) in 1978 with the objective of reducing morbidity, mortality and disabilities among<br />
children from six diseases.<br />
The Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) was introduced in 1985-86 with the<br />
objective of covering at least 85 percent of all infants against the six vaccine preventable diseases<br />
by 1990. This scheme has been introduced in every district of the country. The standard immunization<br />
schedule developed for the child immunization programme specifies the age at which each<br />
vaccine should be administrated and the number of doses to be given. Routine vaccinations received<br />
by infants and children are usually recorded on a vaccination card that is issued for the child.<br />
In the first phase of Round-II, all the women with last and last but one living child born<br />
after January 1, 1999 were asked whether the child/children had received the vaccination against<br />
polio, tuberculosis (BCG), diphtheria, whooping cough (pertusis), tetanus (DPT) and measles,<br />
and for the second phase, the reference period was from January 1, 2001. For Polio and DPT,<br />
further information on polio at birth and number of doses was asked. Children who received<br />
BCG, three doses of DPT and polio (excluding polio 0) and measles are considered to be fully<br />
vaccinated. Information on the source of immunization for last dose and in case where immunization<br />
was not given, the reason for not giving immunization was also compiled.<br />
Table 5.4 gives percentage of children age 12-23 months who received vaccination<br />
according to selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The data shows that<br />
only 32 percent children were fully immunised and three percent children did not at all received<br />
any vaccination. In other words, 65 percent of the children were partially immunised in the state.<br />
The percentage of children who were protected against all the six killer diseases shows that BCG<br />
vaccination was given to over 91 percent children, while 78 percent children received Measles<br />
vaccine in the state. Only 40 percent of the children received three doses of DPT vaccine, while<br />
42 percent of the children received three doses of Polio vaccine in the state. Coverage of each<br />
vaccination including Polio-0 is much higher than the percentage fully vaccinated. The first dose<br />
of DPT vaccine was 74 percent, while its third dose was 40 percent-decline of 34 percent points.<br />
Similarly, first dose of Polio vaccine was 78 percent, while its third dose was 42 percent - decline<br />
of 36 percent points. Further, first dose of DPT and Polio, and Measles are quite close. Figure 5.2<br />
shows percent of children age 12-23 months who have received specific vaccination in the state.<br />
There has been some decline in full vaccination coverage in Jammu & Kashmir State<br />
from over 50 percent in Round-I in 1998-99. These data indicate that despite the progress that<br />
has been made in immunization coverage for children in the state, coverage levels are still low<br />
and a large proportion of children who received some early vaccinations dropped out of the<br />
programme before receiving all of the recommended vaccinations.<br />
The data indicates that the coverage of each type of vaccine except Measles was more in<br />
urban areas than in rural areas. Thirty percent of the children in rural areas as against 37 percent<br />
in urban areas received full immunisation. Eighty-six percent of the children received polio-0 vaccine<br />
at the time of birth in the state irrespective of place of residence. Ninety percent children in rural<br />
areas as against 94 percent children in urban areas received BCG vaccination. Ninety percent male<br />
79
Table 5.4 VACCINATION OF CHILDREN<br />
Percentage of children age 12-23 months who received vaccination according to some selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic Polio 0 BCG<br />
DPT Polio<br />
1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
Measles<br />
Full 1<br />
vaccination<br />
No<br />
vaccination<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
children<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Sex of the child<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Birth order<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Mother’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
85.9<br />
85.5<br />
83.8<br />
88.1<br />
82.9<br />
89.5<br />
83.5<br />
87.9<br />
81.9<br />
87.4<br />
90.8<br />
85.0<br />
86.5<br />
84.0<br />
(72.9)<br />
88.2<br />
87.4<br />
73.8<br />
87.9<br />
88.1<br />
90.4<br />
94.2<br />
89.6<br />
93.6<br />
89.2<br />
91.9<br />
98.6<br />
90.5<br />
89.9<br />
89.3<br />
95.6<br />
91.6<br />
91.5<br />
86.4<br />
(84.7)<br />
92.0<br />
93.5<br />
76.1<br />
94.5<br />
93.8<br />
72.5<br />
79.3<br />
74.6<br />
74.2<br />
70.5<br />
76.6<br />
81.1<br />
74.9<br />
67.9<br />
78.3<br />
82.0<br />
74.7<br />
73.9<br />
71.8<br />
(50.8)<br />
78.5<br />
77.8<br />
50.3<br />
76.4<br />
83.7<br />
59.5<br />
68.1<br />
61.0<br />
63.0<br />
59.5<br />
61.2<br />
67.8<br />
64.9<br />
53.8<br />
67.7<br />
70.5<br />
62.4<br />
60.5<br />
59.4<br />
(42.4)<br />
63.4<br />
65.7<br />
36.2<br />
64.4<br />
70.9<br />
36.1<br />
50.2<br />
41.2<br />
39.0<br />
37.2<br />
39.2<br />
41.1<br />
49.0<br />
34.1<br />
37.6<br />
51.7<br />
44.8<br />
33.4<br />
48.5<br />
(23.7)<br />
43.1<br />
39.0<br />
21.7<br />
40.7<br />
49.0<br />
77.7<br />
78.3<br />
78.3<br />
77.3<br />
74.9<br />
79.1<br />
86.9<br />
75.4<br />
73.7<br />
82.5<br />
81.0<br />
78.2<br />
77.5<br />
82.0<br />
(40.7)<br />
79.1<br />
79.2<br />
47.3<br />
83.7<br />
82.9<br />
72.6<br />
64.3<br />
71.2<br />
69.1<br />
65.4<br />
72.7<br />
82.0<br />
67.8<br />
66.3<br />
78.9<br />
69.9<br />
70.5<br />
70.5<br />
71.7<br />
(35.6)<br />
68.8<br />
72.5<br />
42.4<br />
77.9<br />
70.2<br />
41.3<br />
42.9<br />
43.4<br />
39.7<br />
38.0<br />
43.3<br />
46.9<br />
44.0<br />
39.2<br />
39.8<br />
47.2<br />
46.5<br />
35.9<br />
47.7<br />
(25.4)<br />
41.0<br />
42.3<br />
27.0<br />
42.4<br />
48.3<br />
79.4<br />
74.0<br />
77.8<br />
78.0<br />
75.0<br />
74.4<br />
89.4<br />
82.9<br />
80.2<br />
78.4<br />
73.8<br />
74.7<br />
81.0<br />
76.2<br />
(74.6)<br />
84.0<br />
77.2<br />
60.7<br />
84.7<br />
73.7<br />
30.0<br />
36.9<br />
32.6<br />
31.3<br />
28.1<br />
33.4<br />
34.7<br />
37.0<br />
26.5<br />
30.6<br />
41.8<br />
37.8<br />
24.7<br />
37.0<br />
(13.6)<br />
31.0<br />
32.5<br />
12.1<br />
33.6<br />
39.6<br />
2.5<br />
2.8<br />
4.1<br />
0.8<br />
2.8<br />
3.6<br />
0.5<br />
1.9<br />
3.5<br />
2.7<br />
1.0<br />
2.3<br />
2.4<br />
2.6<br />
(3.4)<br />
2.6<br />
2.4<br />
9.4<br />
0.4<br />
3.2<br />
461<br />
183<br />
348<br />
297<br />
260<br />
203<br />
83<br />
98<br />
307<br />
145<br />
193<br />
320<br />
308<br />
116<br />
33<br />
102<br />
385<br />
99<br />
360<br />
185<br />
Total<br />
85.8<br />
91.5<br />
74.4<br />
61.9<br />
40.2<br />
77.9<br />
70.2<br />
41.7<br />
77.9<br />
32.0<br />
2.6<br />
644<br />
Note-1: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001. Note-2: Total includes 16 children with other religion who were not shown separately. @<br />
Literate mothers with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not and missing cases.<br />
1<br />
BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
80
81<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Percentage of Chidren Age 12-23 months<br />
who have Received Specific Vaccinations<br />
BCG<br />
92<br />
DPT1<br />
DPT2<br />
DPT3<br />
40<br />
62<br />
74<br />
Polio1<br />
Polio2<br />
Polio3<br />
42<br />
70<br />
78<br />
Measles<br />
78<br />
All<br />
None<br />
3<br />
32<br />
=<br />
0 19 38 57 76 95<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percent<br />
children as against 94 percent female children received BCG vaccination. The percentage of children<br />
who received BCG vaccination was the highest (99 percent) for third order birth, followed by<br />
92 percent for second order birth and the lowest (83 percent) for first order birth. The percentage<br />
of children who received BCG vaccination was the highest (93 percent) for other caste children,<br />
followed by 92 percent for OBC children and the lowest (85 percent) for scheduled tribe children.<br />
Ninety-six percent of children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above as against over 89<br />
percent of children having non-literate mother and children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years<br />
had BCG vaccination. Seventy-six percent of children with low SLI as against 94 percent children<br />
with medium and high SLI had BCG vaccination.<br />
The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was 40 percent in<br />
the state - 36 percent in rural areas and 50 percent in urban areas. Forty-one percent of male<br />
children as against 39 percent of female children received three doses of DPT vaccine. The<br />
percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest (49 percent) for<br />
fourth or higher order births, followed by 41 percent for third order births and the lowest (37<br />
percent) for first order births. Forty-five percent of Hindu children as against 33 percent of Muslim<br />
children received three doses of DPT vaccine. The percentage of children who received three doses of<br />
DPT vaccine were the highest (48 percent) for scheduled caste children, followed by 43 percent for<br />
OBC children and the lowest (24 percent) for scheduled tribe children.<br />
The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest (52<br />
percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (34 percent)<br />
for children having non-literate mother, while it was 38 percent for children whose mother had<br />
studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine<br />
as the highest (49 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest (22 percent) for children<br />
with low SLI, while it was 41 percent for children with medium SLI.
82<br />
The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was 42 percent in the<br />
state – 41 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. Forty-three percent of male children<br />
as against 40 percent of female children received three doses of Polio vaccine. Further, percentage<br />
of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (47 percent) for third order<br />
births, followed by 44 percent for four or higher order births and the lowest (38 percent) for first<br />
order births. Over 46 percent of Hindu children as against 36 percent of Muslim children received<br />
three doses of Polio vaccine. The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine<br />
was the highest (48 percent) for scheduled caste children, followed by 42 percent for other caste<br />
children and the lowest (25 percent) for scheduled tribe children. The percentage of children who<br />
received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (47 percent) for children whose mother had<br />
studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (39 percent) for children having non-literate<br />
mother, while it was 40 percent for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />
percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (48 percent) for<br />
children with high SLI and the lowest (27 percent) for children with low SLI, while it was 42<br />
percent for children with medium SLI.<br />
The percentage of children who received three doses of Measles vaccine was 78 percent in<br />
the state – 79 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in urban areas. Seventy-eight percent of the<br />
children received Measles vaccine in the state irrespective of sex. The percentage of children who<br />
received Measles vaccine was the highest (89 percent) for third order births, followed by 83<br />
percent for fourth or higher order births and the lowest (74 percent) for second order births. Seventyfive<br />
percent of Hindu children as against 81 percent of Muslim children received Measles vaccine. The<br />
percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (84 percent) for OBC children,<br />
followed by 77 percent for other caste children and the lowest (75 percent) for scheduled tribe<br />
children. The percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (80 percent)<br />
for children having non-literate mother and the lowest (74 percent) for children whose mother had<br />
studied for 10 years and above, while it was 78 percent for children whose mother had studied for<br />
0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (85<br />
percent) for children with medium SLI and the lowest (61 percent) for children with low SLI,<br />
while it was 74 percent for children with high SLI.<br />
The percentage of children who received full vaccination was 32 percent in the state – 30<br />
percent in rural areas and 37 percent in urban areas. Thirty-three percent of male children as against<br />
31 percent of female children received full vaccination in the state. The percentage of children<br />
who received full vaccination was the highest (37 percent) for fourth or higher order births, followed<br />
by 35 percent for third order births and the lowest (28 percent) for first order births. Thirty-eight<br />
percent of Hindu children as against 25 percent of Muslim children received full vaccination in the<br />
state. The percentage of children who received full vaccination was the highest (37 percent) for<br />
scheduled caste children, followed by over 32 percent for other caste children and the lowest (14<br />
percent) for scheduled tribe children. Further, percentage of children who received full vaccination<br />
was the highest (42 percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />
lowest (26 percent) for children having non-literate mother, while it was 31 percent for children<br />
whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of children who received full vaccination<br />
was the highest (40 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest (12 percent) for children<br />
with low SLI, while it was 34 percent for children with medium SLI. These data suggest that there<br />
exists positive association between percent of children fully vaccinated and education level and<br />
standard of living index of the women (Figure 5.3).
83<br />
Figure 5 .3<br />
Percentage of Children Age 12-23 months<br />
Who Have Received All Vaccination<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Sex of the Child<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Caste<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 years@<br />
10 & above<br />
Standard of Living Index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
12<br />
14<br />
27<br />
32<br />
30<br />
33<br />
31<br />
31<br />
33<br />
31<br />
34<br />
37<br />
37<br />
42<br />
40<br />
0 15 30 45<br />
Percent<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
@ Literate mothers with no years of schooling are also included.<br />
Table 5.5 gives percentage of children age 12-23 months and 24-35 months with a vaccination<br />
card that was shown to the interviewer and percentage who received specific vaccinations by 12<br />
months of age according to place of residence in Jammu& Kashmir State. The percentage of<br />
vaccination card shown to the interviewer was 52 percent for children aged 12-23 months as<br />
against 49 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of vaccination card<br />
shown to the interviewer was 53 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against over 49 percent<br />
for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of vaccination<br />
card shown to the interviewer was 49 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 47<br />
percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state.<br />
The percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by 12 months of age was 86<br />
percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 90 percent for children aged 24-35 months in<br />
the state. The percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by 12 months of age was<br />
86 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 89 percent for children aged 24-35 months<br />
in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received Polio-0 vaccination by<br />
12 months of age was 85 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 94 percent for<br />
children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage of children who received
84<br />
Table 5.5 CHILDHOOD VACCINATION RECEIVED BY 12 MONTHS OF AGE<br />
Percentage of children age 12-23 months and 24-35 months with a vaccination card that was shown to the interviewer and<br />
percentage who received specific vaccinations by 12 months of age according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Vaccination status<br />
12-23<br />
months<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
24-35<br />
months<br />
12-23<br />
months<br />
24-35<br />
months<br />
12-23<br />
months<br />
24-35<br />
months<br />
Vaccination card shown to interviewer<br />
51.6<br />
49.0<br />
52.6<br />
49.5<br />
48.9<br />
47.2<br />
Percentage vaccinated by 12 months of age<br />
Polio 0<br />
85.8<br />
89.9<br />
85.9<br />
88.7<br />
85.5<br />
93.8<br />
BCG<br />
91.5<br />
96.8<br />
90.4<br />
96.0<br />
94.2<br />
99.3<br />
Polio doses<br />
No Polio<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Don’t remember<br />
7.5<br />
7.8<br />
28.9<br />
42.3<br />
13.6<br />
5.5<br />
3.9<br />
12.6<br />
65.8<br />
12.2<br />
7.6<br />
5.2<br />
31.8<br />
42.0<br />
13.5<br />
5.5<br />
4.8<br />
11.6<br />
64.5<br />
13.7<br />
7.1<br />
14.2<br />
21.6<br />
43.2<br />
13.8<br />
5.7<br />
1.2<br />
15.7<br />
70.1<br />
7.3<br />
DPT injection<br />
No DPT<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Don’t remember/missing<br />
9.4<br />
12.7<br />
22.1<br />
40.8<br />
14.8<br />
3.7<br />
7.1<br />
23.4<br />
53.2<br />
12.6<br />
10.3<br />
13.3<br />
23.8<br />
36.9<br />
15.6<br />
4.3<br />
8.0<br />
24.3<br />
50.4<br />
13.1<br />
7.2<br />
11.3<br />
18.0<br />
50.6<br />
12.9<br />
1.7<br />
4.1<br />
20.7<br />
62.6<br />
10.9<br />
Measles<br />
77.9<br />
86.7<br />
79.4<br />
87.5<br />
74.0<br />
84.1<br />
Full 1 vaccination<br />
32.0<br />
43.2<br />
30.0<br />
39.9<br />
36.9<br />
54.2<br />
No vaccination at all<br />
2.6<br />
0.8<br />
2.5<br />
1.0<br />
2.8<br />
0.0<br />
Number of children<br />
644<br />
909<br />
461<br />
696<br />
183<br />
213<br />
Note: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001<br />
1<br />
BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles<br />
BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 91 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against<br />
97 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of children who received<br />
BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 90 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against<br />
96 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of<br />
children who received BCG vaccination by 12 months of age was 94 percent for children aged<br />
12-23 months as against 99 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state.<br />
The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccination by 12 months of<br />
age was 42 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 66 percent for children aged 24-35<br />
months in the state. The percentage of children who received three doses of Polio vaccination by 12<br />
months of age was 42 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 64 percent for children aged<br />
24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received three<br />
doses of Polio vaccination by 12 months of age was 43 percent for children aged 12-23 months<br />
as against 70 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage<br />
of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination by 12 months of age was 41 percent for<br />
children aged 12-23 months as against 53 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The<br />
percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination by 12 months of age was 37<br />
percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 50 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural
85<br />
areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccination<br />
by 12 months of age was 51 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 63 percent for<br />
children aged 24-35 months in urban areas of the state. Again, percentage of children who received<br />
Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 78 percent for children aged 12-23 months as<br />
against 87 percent for children aged 24-35 months in the state. The percentage of children who<br />
received Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 79 percent for children aged 12-23<br />
months as against 87 percent for children aged 24-35 months in rural areas of the state. Similarly,<br />
percentage of children who received Measles vaccination by 12 months of age was 74 percent for<br />
children aged 12-23 months as against 84 percent for children aged 24-35 months in urban areas<br />
of the state. Further, percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months of age was<br />
32 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 43 percent for children aged 24-35 months<br />
in the state. The percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months of age was 30<br />
percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 40 percent for children aged 24-35 months in<br />
rural areas of the state. Similarly, percentage of children who received full vaccination by 12 months<br />
of age was 37 percent for children aged 12-23 months as against 54 percent for children aged 24-35<br />
months in urban areas of the state. Figure 5.4 gives child vaccination by age.<br />
Figure 5.4<br />
Child vaccination by age<br />
54<br />
Percent<br />
32<br />
30<br />
37<br />
43<br />
40<br />
Age 12-23 months<br />
Age 24-35 months<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
5.3 Source of Immunization<br />
Table 5.6 gives percent distribution of children under three years of age who have received any<br />
vaccination by the source of last vaccine, according to place of residence and availability of health<br />
facility in the village. Over 91 percent of the children were immunized at the government health<br />
facility, four percent at the private health facility and over two percent at the ISM and other<br />
facility, while over percent were not sure about the place of immunization. Further, children who<br />
were immunized at the government health facility received vaccination from ‘Government/Municipal<br />
hospital’ (70 percent),‘Community/Primary health centre’ (11 percent),‘sub-centre’ (nine percent)<br />
and ’RCH/MCP camp’ (one percent). The percentage of children receiving vaccination from the<br />
private health facility was lower in rural areas (three percent) than in urban areas (nine percent).<br />
Ninety percent of the children received their vaccination from the government health facility in<br />
urban areas. Further, 93 percent of the children living in villages having no health facility in the<br />
village as against 92 percent of the children living in villages having health facility in the village<br />
received vaccination from the government health facility. Thus, the main source of vaccination of
86<br />
Table 5.6 SOURCE OF CHILDHOOD VACCINATION<br />
Percent distribution of children under age 3 who have received any vaccination by source of last vaccination, according to place<br />
of residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Source of vaccination<br />
Total<br />
Residence<br />
Availability of health<br />
facility 1 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Government health sector<br />
Government/municipal hospital<br />
Community/primary health centre<br />
Sub-centre<br />
RCH/MCP camp<br />
69.8<br />
11.4<br />
9.4<br />
0.9<br />
67.2<br />
11.8<br />
11.9<br />
1.2<br />
77.4<br />
10.2<br />
2.1<br />
0.0<br />
64.6<br />
14.6<br />
11.0<br />
2.8<br />
67.9<br />
11.0<br />
12.2<br />
0.8<br />
Private health sector<br />
Private hospital<br />
Private doctor<br />
1.8<br />
2.4<br />
1.6<br />
1.2<br />
2.5<br />
6.2<br />
0.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.8<br />
1.1<br />
ISM 2 health facility<br />
Other<br />
1.8<br />
0.4<br />
1.9<br />
0.5<br />
1.3<br />
0.0<br />
3.6<br />
0.0<br />
1.5<br />
0.6<br />
Do not remember<br />
Missing<br />
1.4<br />
0.7<br />
1.7<br />
0.9<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
1.2<br />
0.1<br />
1.9<br />
1.1<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of children<br />
2,076<br />
Note: Table includes last and last but one living children born in the three years preceding the survey<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government<br />
dispensary within the village<br />
2<br />
Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />
1,549<br />
527<br />
344<br />
1,2<strong>04</strong><br />
children was the government health facility in the Jammu & Kashmir State.<br />
5.4 Vitamin A and IFA Supplements<br />
Vitamin-A deficiency is one of the most common nutritional deficiency disorders in the world, affecting<br />
more than 250 million children worldwide (Bolem et. al., 1997). The child survival programme also<br />
includes administration of five doses of Vitamin-A for prevention of night blindness and<br />
distribution of IFA for iron supplement. In Round-II, mothers of children born during three years<br />
preceding the survey were asked whether their children had received a dose of Vitamin-A and<br />
IFA tablets/syrup. Those who said that their children had received a dose of Vitamin-A and IFA<br />
tablets/syrup were further asked how many doses were given. Table 5.7 gives percentage of<br />
children age 12-35 months who received at least one dose of Vitamin-A and IFA tablets/syrup by<br />
selected background characteristics in the state. Over 39 percent of the children received at least<br />
one dose of Vitamin-A in the state – 37 percent in rural areas and 47 percent in urban areas. Over<br />
37 percent of male children as against 42 percent of female children received at least one dose of<br />
Vitamin-A in the state. The percentage of children who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A<br />
was the highest (45 percent) for first order births, followed by 41 percent for second order births<br />
and the lowest (24 percent) for fourth or higher order births. Over 45 percent of Hindu children<br />
as against over 33 percent of Muslim children received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A, while it<br />
was 71 percent for Sikh children. The percentage of children who received atleast one dose of<br />
Vitamin-A was the highest (44 percent) for other caste children, followed by 40 percent for<br />
scheduled caste children and the lowest (29 percent) for OBC children. The percentage of children<br />
who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A was the highest (59 percent) for children whose mother<br />
had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (30 percent) for children having non-literate
87<br />
Table 5.7 VITAMIN A AND IFA SUPPLEMENTATION FOR CHILDREN<br />
Percentage of children age 12-35 months who have received at least one dose of Vitamin A and iron folic acid tablets/syrup,<br />
according to selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Percentage who received at<br />
least one dose of vitamin A<br />
Percentage who received<br />
iron folic acid tablets/syrup<br />
Number of<br />
children<br />
Age of the child<br />
12-23 months<br />
24-35 months<br />
38.8<br />
40.0<br />
13.3<br />
11.9<br />
644<br />
909<br />
Sex of the child<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
37.5<br />
41.9<br />
8.9<br />
16.8<br />
847<br />
707<br />
Birth order<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
45.0<br />
41.2<br />
37.4<br />
24.3<br />
14.3<br />
15.4<br />
8.4<br />
5.8<br />
576<br />
505<br />
243<br />
229<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
36.8<br />
47.4<br />
8.8<br />
23.2<br />
1,157<br />
396<br />
Mother’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 years@<br />
10 years and above<br />
29.7<br />
41.2<br />
58.7<br />
6.5<br />
12.7<br />
24.6<br />
841<br />
303<br />
408<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Other<br />
45.5<br />
33.5<br />
70.7<br />
20.3<br />
7.6<br />
6.3<br />
6<strong>04</strong><br />
893<br />
57<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
40.2<br />
29.3<br />
28.7<br />
44.4<br />
10.1<br />
18.6<br />
7.2<br />
14.2<br />
217<br />
103<br />
277<br />
939<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
34.5<br />
33.6<br />
57.2<br />
9.2<br />
8.1<br />
25.2<br />
286<br />
888<br />
379<br />
Availability of health facility in the village 1<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
37.0<br />
36.2<br />
9.2<br />
7.6<br />
9<strong>04</strong><br />
253<br />
Total<br />
39.5<br />
12.5<br />
1,553<br />
Note-1: Table includes last and last but one living children born in the three years preceding the survey. Note-2: Total includes<br />
4 children with missing information with mother education were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate mother with no years of schooling are also included here. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and<br />
missing cases. 1 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital,<br />
and government dispensary within the village.<br />
mother, while it was 41 percent for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />
percentage of children who received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A was 57 percent for children<br />
with high SLI as against 34 percent for children with low and medium SLI. Further, 37 percent of<br />
children living in villages having health facility in the village as against 36 percent of children<br />
living in villages having no facility in the village received atleast one dose of Vitamin-A.<br />
The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/syrup was over 12 percent in the<br />
state – nine percent in rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. Nine percent of male children as
88<br />
against 17 percent of female children received IFA tablets/syrup. Twenty percent of Hindu children<br />
as against eight percent of Muslim children received IFA tablets/syrup, while it was six percent<br />
for other children. The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/syrup was the highest (19<br />
percent) for scheduled tribe children, followed by 14 percent for other caste children and the<br />
lowest (seven percent) for OBC children. The percentage of children who received IFA tablets/<br />
syrup was the highest (25 percent) for children whose mother had studied for 10 years and above<br />
and the lowest (over six percent) for children having non-literate mother, while it was 13 percent<br />
for children whose mother had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, percentage of children who<br />
received IFA tablets/syrup was the highest (25 percent) for children with high SLI and the lowest<br />
(eight percent) for children with medium SLI, while it was nine percent for children with low SLI.<br />
5.5 Immunization Coverage by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 5.8 gives percentage of children aged 12-23 months with a vaccination card that was shown<br />
to the interviewer and percentage who received specific vaccinations by district. The percentage of<br />
children who received Polio-0 was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil and Leh districts,<br />
followed by 98 percent in Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (23 percent) in Poonch<br />
district, while it was 88 percent for the state. The percentage of children who received BCG injection<br />
was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag, Kargil and Leh districts, followed by 97 percent in<br />
Baramula Udhampur districts and the lowest (49 percent) in Poonch district, while it was 95 percent<br />
for the state. The percentage of children who received three doses of DPT vaccine was the highest<br />
(57 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 54 percent in Leh district and the lowest (five percent)<br />
in Srinagar district, while it was 48 percent for the state. The percentage of children who received<br />
three doses of Polio vaccine was the highest (56 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 54<br />
percent in Jammu district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 56 percent<br />
for the state. The percentage of children who received Measles vaccine was the highest (100<br />
percent) in Kargil district, followed by 95 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (29 percent)<br />
in Poonch district, while it was 83 percent for the state. Further, percentage of children who<br />
received full immunization was the highest (50 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 44<br />
percent in Jammu district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 39 percent<br />
for the state (see Map-5). The percentage of children who received at least one dose of Vitamin-A<br />
was the highest (76 percent) in Pulwama district, followed by 74 percent in Kupwara district and<br />
the lowest (zero percent) in Balamula district, while it was 39 percent for the state.<br />
5.6 Child Morbidity and Treatment<br />
This section discusses the awareness, prevalence and treatment of diarrhoea and acute respiratory<br />
infection (ARI). Mothers of surviving children born during three years preceding the survey were<br />
asked if their children suffered from cough and cold or diarrhoea during the two weeks preceding<br />
the survey, and if so, the type of treatment that had been given. Accuracy of all these measures is<br />
affected by the reliability of the mother’s recall of when the diseases occurred.<br />
5.6.1 Awareness of Diarrhoea<br />
Diarrhoea is a major killer disease of children under five years of age. Deaths from acute diarrhoea<br />
are mostly due to dehydration resulting from loss of water and electrolytes. An attempt was made<br />
to collect data on awareness of diarrhoea management and the practice followed during the<br />
episode of diarrhoea. Table 5.9 gives percentage of women who are aware of diarrhoea management,
89<br />
Table 5.8 CHILDHOOD VACCINATION BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of children age 12-23 months with a vaccination card that shown to the interviewer and percentage who received specific<br />
vaccinations by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Percentage vaccinated<br />
Polio 0 BCG DPT3 Polio3 Measles Full 1 None<br />
Percentage received at least<br />
one dose of Vitamin A 3<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
100.0<br />
90.7<br />
87.0<br />
71.8<br />
93.8<br />
100.0<br />
89.7<br />
97.2<br />
91.7<br />
87.9<br />
29.5<br />
15.1<br />
57.0<br />
23.0<br />
49.3<br />
39.4<br />
11.3<br />
55.9<br />
18.9<br />
54.2<br />
89.2<br />
74.2<br />
95.0<br />
85.2<br />
74.5<br />
19.2<br />
9.3<br />
50.5<br />
18.9<br />
43.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.2<br />
56.4<br />
34.4<br />
0.0<br />
18.8<br />
51.1<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
100.0<br />
70.2<br />
97.9<br />
100.0<br />
98.3<br />
100.0<br />
93.8<br />
94.3<br />
100.0<br />
93.5<br />
22.5<br />
32.2<br />
15.9<br />
53.9<br />
18.5<br />
18.8<br />
35.3<br />
25.8<br />
47.9<br />
30.8<br />
100.0<br />
84.5<br />
78.4<br />
87.7<br />
76.1<br />
6.4<br />
29.6<br />
7.2<br />
23.4<br />
5.3<br />
0.0<br />
6.2<br />
2.1<br />
0.0<br />
1.7<br />
73.1<br />
3.2<br />
74.2<br />
60.5<br />
76.0<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
22.7<br />
71.7<br />
70.7<br />
69.0<br />
48.9<br />
89.1<br />
76.0<br />
97.5<br />
41.1<br />
19.4<br />
5.3<br />
40.4<br />
45.2<br />
25.0<br />
5.3<br />
39.1<br />
29.3<br />
69.2<br />
76.0<br />
55.4<br />
13.4<br />
9.5<br />
5.3<br />
20.2<br />
14.4<br />
0.0<br />
19.0<br />
0.0<br />
9.6<br />
12.6<br />
7.7<br />
4.6<br />
Jammu & Kashmir 88.2 94.6 48.1 55.9 83.0 38.6<br />
Note: Table includes only last and last but one living child born since 1.1.1999/1.1.2001<br />
1<br />
BCG, three injection of DPT, three doses of Polio (excluding Polio 0) and measles<br />
1.5<br />
39.5<br />
type of practice followed if child gets diarrhoea, and percentage of women whose child suffered<br />
from diarrhoea by selected background characteristics in Jammu& Kashmir State. The percentage<br />
of the mothers who had child birth during three years preceding the survey and were aware of<br />
diarrhoea management was 70 percent as compared to 48 percent in Round-I, and 60 percent<br />
were aware of ORS, which was 38 percent points up from Round-I. Fifty-three percent women<br />
were aware of salt and sugar solution; 19 percent women reported that they would continue normal<br />
food, 26 percent women said continue breastfeeding and 27 percent women said give plenty of<br />
fluids, while 30 percent women did not know what to give to a child who had diarrhoea.<br />
The percentage of women aware of diarrhoea management was 70 percent in the state –<br />
68 percent in rural areas and 75 percent in urban areas. Seventy-three percent of Hindu women<br />
as against 68 percent of Muslim women were aware of diarrhoea management, while it was 80<br />
percent for Sikh women. Sixty-seven percent of SC/ST women as against 76 percent of OBC<br />
women were aware of diarrhoea management, while it was 69 percent for other caste women. The<br />
percentage of women aware of diarrhoea management was the highest (85 percent) for women<br />
who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (63 percent) for women who had studied<br />
for 0-9 years, while it was 66 percent for non-literate women. Similarly, percentage of women aware<br />
of diarrhoea management was the highest (80 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest<br />
(60 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 69 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />
The percentage of women aware of ORS was 60 percent in the state – 58 percent in rural<br />
areas and 64 percent in urban areas. Knowledge of ORS was higher among Sikh women (64<br />
percent) than Hindu and Muslim women (over 59 percent). The percentage of women aware of<br />
ORS was the highest (71 percent) for OBC women, followed by 59 percent for scheduled tribe<br />
women and the lowest (52 percent) for scheduled caste women. The percentage of women aware<br />
of ORS was the highest (77 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the<br />
lowest (50 percent) for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 56 percent for nonliterate<br />
women. Similarly, percentage of women aware of ORS was the highest (68 percent) for
90<br />
Table 5.9 AWARENESS OF DIARRHOEA<br />
Percentage of women who are aware of diarrhoea management, type of practice followed if child gets diarrhoea, and percentage of<br />
women whose child suffered 1 from diarrhoea by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Knowledge<br />
of diarrhoea<br />
management<br />
Give ORS<br />
Type of practices to be followed if child gets diarrhoea*<br />
Salt and<br />
sugar solution<br />
Continue<br />
normal food<br />
Continue Give plenty<br />
breastfeeding of fluids<br />
Do not<br />
know<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Age<br />
15-24<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
72.1<br />
69.3<br />
71.2<br />
61.3<br />
59.8<br />
58.9<br />
54.7<br />
52.3<br />
54.8<br />
20.0<br />
20.0<br />
12.7<br />
28.5<br />
26.3<br />
24.2<br />
21.9<br />
26.9<br />
31.9<br />
28.4<br />
31.0<br />
28.8<br />
416<br />
1,867<br />
294<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
68.4<br />
75.1<br />
58.5<br />
64.3<br />
52.3<br />
55.1<br />
17.9<br />
23.3<br />
23.9<br />
34.2<br />
24.2<br />
34.5<br />
32.1<br />
24.5<br />
1,954<br />
624<br />
Mother’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
66.2<br />
62.9<br />
84.8<br />
56.1<br />
50.2<br />
77.1<br />
54.3<br />
41.4<br />
59.9<br />
17.2<br />
13.4<br />
28.7<br />
26.7<br />
19.9<br />
31.3<br />
28.0<br />
16.7<br />
32.0<br />
34.1<br />
37.3<br />
15.1<br />
1,444<br />
517<br />
616<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
72.8<br />
67.8<br />
79.6<br />
59.5<br />
59.9<br />
64.3<br />
48.0<br />
56.4<br />
44.9<br />
19.7<br />
19.1<br />
16.2<br />
23.3<br />
28.0<br />
36.6<br />
21.3<br />
30.0<br />
27.1<br />
27.9<br />
32.6<br />
11.3<br />
926<br />
1,561<br />
70<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
67.5<br />
67.0<br />
75.6<br />
69.1<br />
52.5<br />
58.6<br />
70.6<br />
58.1<br />
44.3<br />
49.4<br />
63.5<br />
52.4<br />
18.2<br />
23.8<br />
16.4<br />
20.0<br />
20.2<br />
18.0<br />
31.6<br />
27.3<br />
18.3<br />
25.3<br />
28.3<br />
28.2<br />
32.5<br />
35.8<br />
25.4<br />
30.8<br />
340<br />
155<br />
489<br />
1,565<br />
Standard of living<br />
index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
60.1<br />
68.6<br />
80.4<br />
50.6<br />
59.3<br />
68.1<br />
45.6<br />
55.0<br />
53.4<br />
23.8<br />
16.5<br />
22.4<br />
22.6<br />
26.7<br />
28.4<br />
15.1<br />
29.3<br />
28.4<br />
40.5<br />
31.5<br />
19.5<br />
442<br />
1,515<br />
621<br />
Availability of health<br />
facility 2 in the village<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
68.6<br />
67.6<br />
59.7<br />
54.5<br />
53.8<br />
47.6<br />
17.2<br />
20.0<br />
23.8<br />
24.2<br />
20.7<br />
36.1<br />
31.8<br />
32.9<br />
1,511<br />
443<br />
Total<br />
70.0<br />
59.9<br />
53.0<br />
Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II. 1 Last two weeks<br />
prior to survey. Total includes 1 woman with missing information on education who are not shown separately. Total includes 22<br />
women in other religion who are not shown separately. @ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure<br />
may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or<br />
referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />
women with high SLI and the lowest (51 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 59<br />
percent for women with medium SLI. Further, 60 percent of the women living in villages having<br />
health facility in the village as against 54 percent of the women living in villages having no health<br />
facility in the village were aware of ORS.<br />
5.6.2 Treatment of Diarrhoea<br />
Table 5.10 gives percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and sought<br />
treatment by source of treatment, according to place of residence and availability of health facility in<br />
the village. The percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea was eight percent in<br />
the state – seven percent in rural areas and 12 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women<br />
whose child suffered from diarrhoea was six percent for women living in villages having health<br />
19.2<br />
26.4<br />
26.7<br />
30.3<br />
2,578
91<br />
Table 5.10 TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA<br />
Percentage of women who sought treatment whose child suffered from diarrhoea and by source of treatment, according to place<br />
of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
fcaility 2 in the village<br />
Sought treatment/ source of treatment<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban Yes No<br />
Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />
diarrhoea<br />
7.9<br />
6.7<br />
11.7<br />
5.7<br />
10.2<br />
Number of women<br />
2,578<br />
1,954<br />
624<br />
1,511<br />
443<br />
Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />
diarrhoea treated with ORS<br />
69.5<br />
66.2<br />
75.4<br />
62.5<br />
(71.4)<br />
Percentage of women whose child suffered1 from<br />
diarrhoea sought treatment<br />
80.3<br />
79.4<br />
81.9<br />
82.7<br />
(65.7)<br />
Number of women<br />
205<br />
132<br />
73<br />
87<br />
45<br />
Source of treatment<br />
Government health facility<br />
Hospital/dispensary<br />
UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />
CHC/ <strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
56.3<br />
1.1<br />
1.6<br />
17.6<br />
3.4<br />
50.6<br />
1.7<br />
2.5<br />
23.8<br />
5.3<br />
66.4<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
6.8<br />
0.0<br />
49.2<br />
0.8<br />
3.7<br />
34.2<br />
3.0<br />
(56.5)<br />
(4.3)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(4.3)<br />
(4.3)<br />
Private health facility<br />
NGO/Trust hospital/clinic<br />
Private hospital clinic<br />
0.2<br />
12.2<br />
0.4<br />
9.9<br />
0.0<br />
16.1<br />
0.6<br />
7.7<br />
(0.0)<br />
(17.4)<br />
ISM3 facility<br />
Home remedy<br />
Other<br />
42.8<br />
0.6<br />
2.6<br />
28.3<br />
0.9<br />
4.1<br />
68.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
30.5<br />
1.3<br />
4.4<br />
(26.1)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(4.3)<br />
Percent distribution of women who seek<br />
treatment by<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />
Relative/friends<br />
Chemist/medical shop<br />
87.2<br />
7.3<br />
1.4<br />
4.0<br />
82.3<br />
9.1<br />
2.3<br />
6.4<br />
95.9<br />
4.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
82.0<br />
9.9<br />
0.0<br />
8.1<br />
(78.3)<br />
(8.7)<br />
(8.7)<br />
(4.3)<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
164<br />
105<br />
60<br />
72<br />
33<br />
Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase- II.<br />
1<br />
Last two weeks prior to survey. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital,<br />
government hospital, and government dispensary within the village. 3 Either government or private health facility of Indian<br />
System of Medicine () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
facility in the village as against 10 percent for women living in villages having no health facility<br />
in the village. Further, percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and treated<br />
with ORS was over 69 percent in the state – 66 percent in rural areas and 75 percent in urban areas.<br />
The percentage of women whose child suffered from diarrhoea and treated with ORS was over 62<br />
percent of the women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 71 percent<br />
of women living in villages having no health facility in the village. More of the women living in<br />
villages having no health facility in the village whose child suffered from diarrhoeas treated the<br />
child with ORS.<br />
Further, percentage of women whose children suffered from diarrhoea-sought treatment was
92<br />
80 percent in the state – 79 percent in rural areas and 82 percent in urban areas. Eighty-three<br />
percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 66 percent of<br />
women living in villages having no health facility in the village whose children suffered from<br />
diarrhoea sought treatment. The percentage of women who sought treatment from government<br />
health facility was 80 percent, from private health facility 12 percent, from ISM facility 43<br />
percent and from other health facility three percent, while one percent women treated the child<br />
with home remedy. In other words, more than one-third women sought treatment from more than<br />
facility. Eighty-seven percent women sought treatment from the doctor, seven percent from ANM/<br />
Nurse/LHV and four percent from chemist/medical shop, while over percent from relatives/friends.<br />
5.6.3 Awareness of Pneumonia<br />
Another major killer disease among infants and children is Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI)<br />
including pneumonia. Early diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics can prevent a large proportion<br />
of ARI/pneumonia deaths. An attempt was made to understand the awareness level of pneumonia,<br />
and the proportion of children who had suffered from pneumonia during the last two weeks<br />
before the survey and their health seeking behaviour. Table 5.11 gives percentage of women who<br />
are aware of danger signs of pneumonia by signs by selected background characteristics and<br />
availability of health facility in the village in the state. Only 31 percent of the women were aware<br />
of danger signs of pneumonia in the state – 28 percent in rural areas and 38 percent in urban areas.<br />
The figure was slightly up from over 26 percent in Round-I. Knowledge of danger signs of pneumonia<br />
was highest (35 percent) for women aged 35-44 years and lowest (23 percent) for women aged<br />
15-24 years. Over 36 percent of Hindu women as against 28 percent of Muslim women were aware<br />
danger signs of pneumonia, while it was 25 percent for Sikh women. The percentage of women<br />
aware of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (34 percent) for scheduled caste women,<br />
followed by 32 percent for other caste women and the lowest (27 percent) for scheduled tribe women.<br />
The percentage of women aware of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (42 percent) for<br />
women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (25 percent) for non-literate women,<br />
while it was 34 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. The percentage of women aware<br />
of danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (37 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest<br />
(21 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 31 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />
Further, percentage of women aware of danger signs of pneumonia was 26 percent for women living<br />
in villages having health facility in the village as against 38 percent for women living in villages<br />
having no health facility in the village.<br />
Women, who were aware of the danger signs of pneumonia, were further asked about<br />
danger signs of pneumonia. Danger signs reported were ‘difficulty in breathing’ (89 percent),‘chest indrawing’<br />
(37 percent),‘not able to drink or take a feeding’ (63 percent),‘excessive drowsy and difficulty<br />
in keeping awake’ (37 percent),‘pain in chest and productive cough’ (62 percent),‘condition get worse<br />
than before’ (41 percent), ‘wheezing/whistling’ (17 percent) and ‘rapid breathing’ (28 percent).<br />
5.6.4 Treatment of Pneumonia<br />
Table 5.12 gives percentage of women whose child suffered from pneumonia and sought treatment<br />
and source of treatment according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the<br />
village. The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />
was 20 percent in the state – 20 percent in rural areas and 19 percent in urban areas. Further, percentage
Table 5.11 AWARENESS OF PNEUEMONIA<br />
Percentage of women who are aware of danger signs of pneumonia by signs by selected background characteristics and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Percentage<br />
of women<br />
aware of<br />
danger<br />
signs of<br />
pneumonia<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Difficulty in<br />
breathing<br />
Chest indrawing<br />
Not able to<br />
drink or<br />
take a<br />
feeding<br />
Danger signs of ARI<br />
Excessive<br />
drowsy and<br />
difficulty in<br />
keeping<br />
awake<br />
Pain in<br />
chest and<br />
productive<br />
cough<br />
Conditions<br />
get worse<br />
than before<br />
Wheezing/<br />
whistling<br />
Rapid<br />
breathing<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Age group (in years)<br />
15-24<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Mother’s education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Availability of health<br />
facility 2 in the village<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
22.8<br />
32.0<br />
34.9<br />
28.4<br />
38.4<br />
24.9<br />
34.5<br />
41.7<br />
36.5<br />
28.1<br />
25.0<br />
33.7<br />
27.2<br />
28.1<br />
31.8<br />
20.9<br />
31.3<br />
36.9<br />
25.6<br />
38.2<br />
416<br />
1,867<br />
294<br />
1,954<br />
624<br />
1,444<br />
517<br />
616<br />
926<br />
1,561<br />
70<br />
340<br />
155<br />
489<br />
1,565<br />
442<br />
1,515<br />
621<br />
1,511<br />
443<br />
84.7<br />
89.9<br />
86.8<br />
89.6<br />
87.1<br />
91.0<br />
87.9<br />
86.4<br />
83.0<br />
93.1<br />
*<br />
95.5<br />
78.1<br />
96.5<br />
86.5<br />
89.4<br />
89.3<br />
87.6<br />
88.4<br />
92.5<br />
42.1<br />
37.4<br />
27.9<br />
37.1<br />
36.0<br />
35.2<br />
21.1<br />
49.8<br />
35.2<br />
37.2<br />
*<br />
47.6<br />
41.6<br />
32.6<br />
34.7<br />
57.7<br />
28.8<br />
44.6<br />
39.1<br />
32.5<br />
61.0<br />
61.6<br />
72.8<br />
67.3<br />
53.0<br />
72.4<br />
67.1<br />
47.0<br />
44.7<br />
78.5<br />
*<br />
44.5<br />
47.6<br />
68.4<br />
67.4<br />
49.0<br />
75.8<br />
42.1<br />
61.6<br />
80.3<br />
36.0<br />
37.4<br />
34.9<br />
42.3<br />
24.4<br />
51.5<br />
22.0<br />
26.8<br />
20.9<br />
50.2<br />
*<br />
21.9<br />
43.3<br />
44.6<br />
37.9<br />
44.3<br />
45.1<br />
17.0<br />
32.6<br />
64.3<br />
64.2<br />
60.7<br />
67.5<br />
56.5<br />
74.7<br />
60.8<br />
73.8<br />
55.6<br />
57.5<br />
66.1<br />
*<br />
56.1<br />
51.5<br />
79.7<br />
59.7<br />
66.7<br />
64.2<br />
55.5<br />
63.6<br />
40.5<br />
39.2<br />
40.6<br />
46.5<br />
48.7<br />
23.7<br />
55.7<br />
29.4<br />
29.0<br />
26.5<br />
53.4<br />
*<br />
23.6<br />
50.1<br />
47.4<br />
42.9<br />
56.3<br />
46.2<br />
24.7<br />
44.1<br />
59.1<br />
18.1<br />
18.1<br />
6.9<br />
12.5<br />
26.4<br />
11.7<br />
11.3<br />
27.4<br />
25.3<br />
9.0<br />
*<br />
32.7<br />
15.6<br />
6.0<br />
16.1<br />
16.9<br />
11.3<br />
27.7<br />
11.4<br />
15.0<br />
24.0<br />
27.7<br />
35.6<br />
28.3<br />
28.4<br />
23.1<br />
37.8<br />
28.9<br />
24.8<br />
31.1<br />
*<br />
37.0<br />
42.3<br />
25.3<br />
26.1<br />
22.3<br />
26.7<br />
34.1<br />
28.1<br />
28.6<br />
95<br />
597<br />
103<br />
556<br />
239<br />
360<br />
178<br />
257<br />
338<br />
439<br />
17<br />
115<br />
42<br />
137<br />
498<br />
92<br />
474<br />
229<br />
386<br />
169<br />
Total<br />
30.8<br />
2,578<br />
88.9<br />
36.7<br />
63.0<br />
36.9<br />
62.0<br />
41.2<br />
16.7<br />
28.3<br />
795<br />
Note-1: Total includes 1 woman with missing information on education who is not shown separately. Note-2: Total includes 22 women in other religion who were not shown separately<br />
Note-3: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II. 1 Last two weeks prior to survey.<br />
@ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
2<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />
Total includes 4 women with missing information on education who are not shown separately.<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
93
Table 5.12 TREATMENT OF PNEUEMONIA<br />
Percentage of women who sought treatment whose child suffered 1 from cough and cold and source of treatment, according to<br />
place of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
fcaility 2 in the village<br />
Sought treatment/ source of treatment<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Yes No<br />
Percentage of women whose child suffered from<br />
cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />
19.7<br />
19.8<br />
19.4<br />
18.6<br />
24.2<br />
Number of women<br />
2,578<br />
1,954<br />
624<br />
1,511<br />
443<br />
Percentage of women sought treatment whose<br />
child suffered from cough and cold<br />
95.2<br />
94.6<br />
97.4<br />
96.2<br />
90.2<br />
Number of women<br />
502<br />
382<br />
120<br />
277<br />
105<br />
Source of treatment<br />
Government health facility<br />
Hospital/dispensary<br />
UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />
CHC/ <strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
77.0<br />
0.7<br />
1.5<br />
10.4<br />
3.5<br />
77.0<br />
0.8<br />
1.8<br />
13.2<br />
4.2<br />
77.0<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.6<br />
1.2<br />
77.4<br />
0.4<br />
1.2<br />
9.3<br />
2.5<br />
75.9<br />
1.9<br />
3.5<br />
24.4<br />
9.1<br />
Private health facility<br />
NGO/Trust hospital/clinic<br />
Private hospital clinic<br />
0.7<br />
10.9<br />
0.8<br />
7.6<br />
0.4<br />
21.0<br />
0.3<br />
7.6<br />
1.9<br />
7.6<br />
ISM3 facility<br />
Home remedy<br />
Other<br />
6.1<br />
2.3<br />
0.5<br />
6.5<br />
2.4<br />
0.6<br />
4.8<br />
2.0<br />
0.4<br />
6.8<br />
1.2<br />
0.1<br />
5.6<br />
5.7<br />
1.9<br />
Percent distribution of women who seek<br />
treatment by<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/Nurse/LHV<br />
Dai (trained or untrained)<br />
Relative/friends<br />
Chemist/medical shop<br />
96.6<br />
2.4<br />
0.7<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
96.9<br />
1.8<br />
0.9<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
95.8<br />
4.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
95.8<br />
2.4<br />
1.2<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
100.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
478<br />
362<br />
117<br />
267<br />
95<br />
Note: Table based on women with living children born since 01.01.1999 for phase - I /01.01.2001 for phase - II.<br />
1<br />
Last two weeks prior to survey. 2 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, Community health centre or referral hospital,<br />
government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />
3<br />
Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />
of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing was 19 percent for<br />
women living in villages having health facility in the village as against 24 percent for women<br />
living in villages having no health facility in the village.<br />
The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />
who sought treatment was 95 percent in the state – 95 percent in rural areas and 97 percent in urban<br />
areas. The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing<br />
who sought treatment was 96 percent for women living in villages having health facility in the<br />
village as against 90 percent for women living in villages having no health facility in the village.<br />
The percentage of women whose child suffered from cough, cold and difficulty in breathing sought<br />
treatment from government health facility was 93 percent, from private health facility 12 percent,<br />
94
from ISM facility six percent and less than one percent from other health facility, while over two<br />
percent women tried home remedy. In other words, eleven percent women sought treatment from<br />
more than one health facility. Ninety-seven percent women sought treatment from the doctor, over<br />
two percent from ANM/Nurse/LHV and the remaining one percent sought treatment other facilities.<br />
5.6.5 Awareness of Diarrhoea, ORS and Pneumonia and Incidence of Diarrhoea and Pneumonia<br />
by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 5.13 gives percentage of women by awareness of diarrhoea management, ORS, danger<br />
signs of pneumonia and whose child suffered from diarrhoea and pneumonia during last two<br />
weeks prior to survey by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women aware of<br />
diarrhoea management was the highest (100 percent) in Anantnag district and the lowest (28<br />
percent) in Kathua district, while it was 70 percent for the state. The percentage of women aware<br />
of ORS was the highest (93 percent) in Anantnag district and the lowest (19 percent) in Kathua<br />
district, while it was 60 percent for the state. The percentage of women whose child suffered<br />
from diarrhoea was the highest (19 percent) in Srinagar district and the lowest (one percent) in<br />
Kathua district, while it was eight percent for the state. Further, percentage of women aware of<br />
danger signs of pneumonia was the highest (46 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (over<br />
five percent) in Leh district, while it was 31 percent for the state. The percentage of women whose<br />
child suffered from pneumonia was the highest (41 percent) in Baramula district and the lowest (two<br />
percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 20 percent for the state.<br />
Table 5.13 KNOWLEDGE OF DIARRHOEA MANAGEMENT AND PNEUMONIA BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of women by awareness of diarrhoea management, ORS, danger signs of pneumonia and whose child had suffered<br />
from diarrhoea and pneumonia during last two weeks prior to survey by district, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Percentage of women aware of<br />
Percentage of women<br />
Diarrhoea<br />
Management ORS<br />
whose child suffered 1<br />
from diarrhoea<br />
100.0<br />
41.8<br />
65.7<br />
58.6<br />
90.5<br />
93.3<br />
26.4<br />
60.4<br />
49.6<br />
75.1<br />
2.4<br />
14.8<br />
2.5<br />
15.9<br />
13.1<br />
Percentage of women aware<br />
of danger signs of<br />
pneumonia<br />
28.7<br />
8.3<br />
46.2<br />
33.8<br />
44.0<br />
Percentage of women<br />
whose child suffered 1 from<br />
pneumonia<br />
1.9<br />
17.5<br />
40.9<br />
21.5<br />
14.3<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
98.8<br />
28.2<br />
41.5<br />
89.0<br />
42.1<br />
85.7<br />
19.0<br />
31.8<br />
80.0<br />
32.2<br />
7.5<br />
1.1<br />
5.7<br />
14.4<br />
6.5<br />
14.1<br />
8.3<br />
16.0<br />
5.5<br />
15.7<br />
7.6<br />
26.0<br />
10.8<br />
5.0<br />
12.5<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
84.9<br />
61.5<br />
73.2<br />
63.2<br />
77.3<br />
58.9<br />
51.3<br />
41.6<br />
3.9<br />
5.2<br />
18.7<br />
7.7<br />
11.7<br />
42.8<br />
13.3<br />
18.5<br />
22.0<br />
13.6<br />
28.0<br />
17.7<br />
Jammu & Kashmir 70.0<br />
59.9<br />
7.9<br />
30.8<br />
19.7<br />
Note: Table based on women with last and last but one living children born since 01.01.1999 /01.01.2001. 1 Last two weeks prior to survey.<br />
95
Map-5<br />
Percentage of Children (Age 12-23 Months) Who Have Received Full Vaccination<br />
96
CHAPTER VI<br />
FAMILY PLANNING<br />
The Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme has been implemented with a new philosophy and<br />
direction to meet the health care needs of women and children. It envisages the provision of<br />
couples to control their fertility and have sexual relations free from the fear of pregnancy.<br />
Provision of free contraceptive services to all the needy couples is one of the components of the<br />
RCH programme. In DLHS-RCH a separate section on family planning was canvassed to all the<br />
eligible women to assess the knowledge and practice of various family planning methods. The<br />
information on source of currently adopted contraceptive method, source of supply of the method<br />
and health problems related to contraceptive use were collected from current users. The current<br />
non-users were asked about the past status of contraceptive use, reason for not using<br />
contraceptives currently and future intention to adopt a family planning method.<br />
An attempt was made to understand why male methods of family planning especially that<br />
of vasectomy was not in common use. The husbands of sampled eligible women were asked about<br />
the contraceptive method they would recommend to a couple who was not desirous of any<br />
additional children. They were also asked about the reasons for not preferring male methods and<br />
their knowledge about the no-scalpel vasectomy. This chapter presents the results of data on<br />
contraceptive practices collected from both the sampled women and their husbands.<br />
6.1 Knowledge of Family Planning Methods<br />
Lack of knowledge of various contraceptive choices can be a major barrier in the promotion and<br />
use of contraceptives among couples. In DLHS-RCH information on knowledge of contraceptives was<br />
obtained by asking a question, “Which are the family planning methods are you aware of?” to each<br />
sampled women. The knowledge of no-scalpel vasectomy was also asked to the husbands of eligible<br />
women. If the respondent did not recognise the name of the family planning method, he was given<br />
a brief description on how a particular method was to be used. The DLHS-RCH assesses the<br />
knowledge of female sterilisation, male sterilisation including NSV, IUD, Pills, condom and<br />
traditional methods along similar lines.<br />
Table 6.1 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who know any<br />
contraceptive methods by specific method and selected background characteristics in Jammu &<br />
Kashmir State. The data shows that knowledge of any method including any modern contraceptive<br />
method was almost universal in the state. The knowledge of any modern method among the eligible<br />
women was 96 percent in the state – 96 percent in rural areas and 99 percent in urban areas.<br />
Further, knowledge of any modern spacing method among eligible women was 82 percent in the<br />
state – 79 percent in rural areas and 91 percent in urban areas. The knowledge of all modern<br />
method among eligible women was 32 percent in the state – 28 percent in rural areas and 43<br />
percent in urban areas. The difference in the knowledge of any modern methods and all modern<br />
methods is 64 percentage points.<br />
The extent of knowledge about female sterilisation was 88 percent – 42 percent for<br />
Tubectomy and 22 percent for Laparoscopy. Similarly, knowledge about male sterilisation was 67<br />
percent in the state – 21 percent for vasectomy and eight percent foe No-scalpel-vasectomy. The
Table 6.1 KNOWLEDGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS<br />
Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years who know any contraceptive method by specific method and<br />
selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Contraceptive methods<br />
Total<br />
Availability of health facility in<br />
Residence<br />
the village 3<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Any method<br />
Any modern method<br />
Any modern spacing method 1<br />
All modern methods 2<br />
97.3<br />
96.5<br />
82.3<br />
32.1<br />
96.9<br />
95.9<br />
79.4<br />
28.5<br />
98.8<br />
98.8<br />
91.3<br />
43.5<br />
97.2<br />
97.2<br />
80.4<br />
35.7<br />
96.7<br />
95.4<br />
79.1<br />
26.0<br />
Female sterilization<br />
Tubectomy<br />
Laparoscopy<br />
88.0<br />
41.6<br />
21.9<br />
85.4<br />
40.2<br />
21.9<br />
96.2<br />
46.2<br />
21.9<br />
89.9<br />
38.6<br />
18.4<br />
83.8<br />
40.8<br />
23.1<br />
Male sterilization<br />
Vasectomy<br />
No-scalpel vasectomy<br />
67.4<br />
21.4<br />
8.2<br />
63.2<br />
20.9<br />
8.5<br />
80.8<br />
23.1<br />
7.4<br />
74.2<br />
23.0<br />
12.1<br />
59.3<br />
20.1<br />
7.2<br />
IUD/Loop<br />
54.2<br />
49.9<br />
67.8<br />
56.4<br />
47.5<br />
Pills<br />
Daily<br />
Weekly<br />
Condom/Nirodh<br />
Sponge (today)<br />
Injectables<br />
Norplant<br />
Contraceptive herbs<br />
Any traditional method<br />
Any other Indian system of<br />
medicinal contraceptives<br />
63.2<br />
38.8<br />
36.2<br />
67.1<br />
10.6<br />
8.1<br />
4.3<br />
4.2<br />
19.2<br />
3.0<br />
61.8<br />
39.5<br />
36.7<br />
63.5<br />
9.7<br />
7.6<br />
3.9<br />
3.5<br />
19.3<br />
2.9<br />
67.9<br />
36.6<br />
34.7<br />
78.6<br />
13.8<br />
9.6<br />
5.7<br />
6.2<br />
18.7<br />
3.6<br />
67.8<br />
39.1<br />
32.4<br />
64.8<br />
5.5<br />
8.2<br />
1.7<br />
1.7<br />
19.3<br />
1.5<br />
59.6<br />
39.6<br />
38.2<br />
63.0<br />
11.1<br />
7.4<br />
4.6<br />
4.2<br />
19.4<br />
3.3<br />
Number of women<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
2,086<br />
5,765<br />
1<br />
Include IUD, pills and condom. 2 Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, pills and condom<br />
3<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village.<br />
Figure 6.1<br />
Knowledge of Family Planning Method<br />
Any modern<br />
97<br />
Any modern spacing<br />
82<br />
All modern<br />
32<br />
Any tradtional<br />
19<br />
Female sterilization<br />
88<br />
Male sterilization<br />
67<br />
IUD<br />
54<br />
Pills<br />
63<br />
Condom<br />
67<br />
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percent<br />
98
extent of knowledge among eligible women about spacing methods was 54 percent for IUD/Loop,<br />
63 percent for Pills, 67 percent for condom/nirodh. Knowledge about Daily Pills was 39 percent as<br />
against 36 percent for Weekly Pills. The knowledge about other contraceptive methods was 11<br />
percent for Sponge (today), eight percent for Injectables and four percent for Norplant. Further, extent<br />
of knowledge of any traditional method was 19 percent, contraceptive herbs four percent and any<br />
ISM contraceptives three percent. Figure 6.1 shows knowledge of family planning method.<br />
6.1.1 Knowledge of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 6.2 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who know any<br />
contraceptive method by specific method in Jammu & Kashmir State. In eight out of 14 districts<br />
knowledge about any contraceptives method was 99 percent or more and it was the lowest (89<br />
percent) in Srinagar district. The extent of knowledge about any modern method was 99 percent or<br />
more in Anantnag, Badgam, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Rajouri<br />
districts and it was the lowest (88 percent) in Srinagar and Udhampur districts. The extent of<br />
knowledge about any modern spacing method was the highest (over 99 percent) in Anantnag and<br />
Doda districts, followed by 98 percent in Baramula and Leh districts and the lowest (27 percent) in<br />
Badgam district, while it was 82 percent for the state. The percentage of women having knowledge<br />
about all modern methods was the highest (73 percent) in Pulwama district, followed by 72 percent<br />
in Kupwara district and the lowest (less than one percent) in Badgam district. The percentage of<br />
women having knowledge about all modern methods was higher than that of state (32 percent) in<br />
Baramula, Jammu, Doda, Kupwara and Pulwama districts and in the remaining nine districts it was<br />
lower than that of the state.<br />
Table 6.2 KNOWLEDGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years who know any contraceptive method by specific method and district,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Any<br />
method<br />
Any<br />
modern 1<br />
method<br />
Any<br />
modern<br />
spacing 2<br />
method<br />
All modern 3<br />
methods<br />
Male<br />
sterilization<br />
Female<br />
sterilization IUD Pill<br />
Condom<br />
/Nirodh<br />
Any<br />
traditional<br />
method<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
97.6<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
99.9<br />
96.8<br />
99.2<br />
26.7<br />
97.7<br />
99.8<br />
92.1<br />
30.9<br />
0.5<br />
59.1<br />
39.8<br />
35.1<br />
71.7<br />
29.8<br />
99.7<br />
98.8<br />
70.8<br />
99.9<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
99.4<br />
77.8<br />
49.5<br />
8.0<br />
95.7<br />
49.7<br />
68.2<br />
94.5<br />
19.3<br />
96.4<br />
90.5<br />
60.3<br />
85.6<br />
10.3<br />
59.4<br />
93.9<br />
82.3<br />
54.4<br />
25.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
26.2<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
99.8<br />
95.7<br />
99.4<br />
99.8<br />
99.6<br />
99.7<br />
95.7<br />
99.2<br />
99.3<br />
99.6<br />
97.4<br />
55.4<br />
89.6<br />
97.6<br />
96.8<br />
18.5<br />
13.2<br />
71.9<br />
1.9<br />
72.9<br />
37.1<br />
71.4<br />
92.1<br />
8.7<br />
97.9<br />
99.0<br />
95.0<br />
98.9<br />
78.9<br />
99.3<br />
53.3<br />
33.2<br />
83.1<br />
56.1<br />
83.7<br />
94.7<br />
17.1<br />
85.2<br />
95.0<br />
88.6<br />
82.7<br />
51.1<br />
79.2<br />
78.2<br />
86.9<br />
19.8<br />
8.2<br />
26.5<br />
12.2<br />
29.5<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
93.9<br />
99.5<br />
89.3<br />
93.8<br />
93.3<br />
99.5<br />
87.9<br />
87.7<br />
69.7<br />
48.9<br />
70.8<br />
77.2<br />
13.2<br />
24.3<br />
5.7<br />
18.3<br />
65.6<br />
45.9<br />
18.2<br />
45.1<br />
75.9<br />
98.7<br />
58.2<br />
69.2<br />
41.7<br />
33.8<br />
25.8<br />
28.2<br />
40.4<br />
39.7<br />
40.7<br />
43.3<br />
39.7<br />
43.9<br />
58.2<br />
59.0<br />
9.1<br />
5.0<br />
12.1<br />
13.3<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
97.3<br />
96.5<br />
82.3<br />
32.1<br />
67.4<br />
88.0<br />
54.2<br />
63.2<br />
67.1<br />
19.2<br />
1<br />
Includes Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom. 2 Includes IUD, Pills and Condom. 3 Includes Female<br />
sterilization & Male sterilization & IUD & Pills and Condom.<br />
The extent of knowledge among eligible women about male sterilization was the highest<br />
(100 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 99 percent in Doda district and the lowest (nine<br />
99
percent) in Leh district, while it was 67 percent for the state. Similarly, the extent of knowledge<br />
among eligible women about female sterilization was 90 percent or more in nine districts and the<br />
lowest (58 percent) in Srinagar district. The percentage of eligible women having knowledge about<br />
IUD/Loop was the highest (96 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 84 percent in Pulwama<br />
district and the lowest (eight percent) in Badgam district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />
The extent of knowledge among eligible women about Pills was the highest (96 percent) in Baramula<br />
district, followed by 95 percent in Kargil and Leh districts and the lowest (17 percent) in Kathua<br />
district, while it was 63 percent for the state. The extent of knowledge among eligible women about<br />
condom was the highest (94 percent) in Doda district, followed by 87 percent in Pulwama district<br />
and the lowest (10 percent) in Badgam district, while it was 67 method percent for the state. Further,<br />
the extent of knowledge among eligible women about any traditional method was the highest (54<br />
percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 29 percent in Pulwama district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Baramula district, while it was 19 percent for the state.<br />
6.1.2 Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV)<br />
Table 6.3 gives percentage of husbands having knowledge of no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) by<br />
residence and availability of health facility in the village. Only 12 percent of the husbands had<br />
knowledge of NSV in the state – 11 percent in rural areas and 15 percent in urban areas. The<br />
percentage of husbands who had knowledge of NSV was eight percent for husbands living in<br />
villages having no health facility in the village as against 12 percent for husband living in villages<br />
having health facility in the village. The percentage of husbands who said that NSV is simpler than<br />
conventional vasectomy was 71 percent in the state – 66 percent in rural areas and 83 percent in<br />
urban areas. The percentage of husbands who said that NSV does not lead to any complication was<br />
71 percent in the state – 70 percent in rural areas and 74 percent in urban areas. The percentage<br />
of husbands who said that NSV does not affect man’s sexual performance was 54 percent in the<br />
state – 58 percent in rural areas and 44 percent in urban areas. Sixty-three percent of the husbands<br />
living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 56 percent of husbands living<br />
in villages having health facility in the village said that NSV does not affect sexual performance.<br />
Table 6.3 KNOWLEDGE OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY (NSV)<br />
Husbands knowledge of NSV by residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Knowledge of NSV<br />
Percentage of husband who had knowledge about NSV<br />
Total<br />
12.2<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility in the village 1<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
11.1<br />
15.4<br />
8.2<br />
12.2<br />
Number of husbands<br />
10,239<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
2,067<br />
5,734<br />
Who know that NSV is simpler than conventional vasectomy<br />
71.0<br />
66.0<br />
82.7<br />
71.6<br />
64.6<br />
Who feel that NSV does not lead to any complication<br />
71.1<br />
69.8<br />
74.1<br />
76.0<br />
68.3<br />
Who feel that NSV does not affect man’s sexual performance<br />
53.6<br />
57.7<br />
44.2<br />
62.6<br />
56.5<br />
Number of husbands<br />
1,245<br />
868<br />
377<br />
171<br />
698<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village.<br />
6.1.3 Knowledge of No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 6.4 gives percentage of husband of eligible women by knowledge of NSV by district in the<br />
100
Table 6.4 NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of husband of eligible women by knowledge of NSV by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Knowledge about<br />
NSV<br />
NSV is simpler than<br />
conventional method<br />
Who reported NSV does<br />
not lead to any<br />
complication<br />
Who reported NSV does not<br />
affect man’s sexual<br />
performance<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
9.9<br />
24.7<br />
0.5<br />
0.1<br />
17.0<br />
81.0<br />
70.4<br />
42.0<br />
0.0<br />
68.3<br />
42.0<br />
68.2<br />
42.0<br />
100.0<br />
67.7<br />
37.6<br />
42.8<br />
100.0<br />
0.0<br />
44.8<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
26.6<br />
14.3<br />
8.9<br />
37.1<br />
10.0<br />
37.0<br />
89.6<br />
88.5<br />
62.5<br />
87.7<br />
27.7<br />
92.1<br />
62.1<br />
39.6<br />
63.5<br />
42.4<br />
84.8<br />
13.3<br />
47.8<br />
13.7<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
19.5<br />
0.1<br />
24.8<br />
3.3<br />
23.4<br />
100.0<br />
70.8<br />
64.9<br />
72.8<br />
100.0<br />
88.0<br />
82.4<br />
22.0<br />
0.0<br />
85.0<br />
18.1<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
12.2<br />
71.0<br />
71.1<br />
53.6<br />
state. The percentage of husbands having knowledge about NSV was the highest (37 percent) in<br />
Leh district, followed by 27 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />
Baramula, Doda and Rajouri districts, while it was 12 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />
husbands who know NSV is simpler than conventional method was the highest (100 percent) in<br />
Rajouri district, followed by 90 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />
district, while it was 71 percent for the state. The percentage of husbands who know about NSV and<br />
reported that it does not lead to any complications was the highest (100 percent) in Doda and<br />
Rajouri districts, followed by 92 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (28 percent) in Kargil<br />
district, while it was 71 percent for the state. The percentage of husbands who reported that NSV<br />
does not affect a man’s sexual performance was the highest (100 percent) in Baramula district,<br />
followed by 85 percent in Kathua and Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda<br />
district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />
6.2 Current use of Family Planning Methods<br />
Table 6.5 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years currently using any<br />
contraceptive method by selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of<br />
women using any modern method was 52 percent in the state – 49 percent in rural areas and 62<br />
percent in urban areas. The current use of modern methods is four points up from Round-I. Use of<br />
modern method was reported by 52 percent of the women – 25 percent any modern spacing method<br />
and 27 percent any sterilization method. The most preferred among the users of sterilization<br />
methods was female sterilization by 25 percent women and male sterilization by two percent males.<br />
The use of any traditional method was three percent in the state – one percent women were using<br />
Rhythm/periodic abstinence method and two percent women were using withdrawal method.<br />
Figure 6.2 shows practice of family planning methods.<br />
Current use of contraception was 57 percent for scheduled caste women and also women<br />
from other castes as against 31 percent for scheduled tribe women, while it was 48 percent for<br />
OBC women. The current use of contraception was 51 percent for women living in villages<br />
101
Table 6.5 CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATE<br />
Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years currently using any contraceptive method by selected background characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Method<br />
Any<br />
method<br />
Any<br />
modern 1<br />
method<br />
Any modern<br />
spacing<br />
method 2<br />
Any<br />
sterilization<br />
Male<br />
sterilization<br />
Female<br />
sterilization<br />
IUD/<br />
Loop<br />
Pill<br />
Condom<br />
/ Nirodh<br />
Any<br />
traditional<br />
method 3<br />
Rhythm<br />
/periodic<br />
abstinence<br />
Withdrawal<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
50.9<br />
67.1<br />
48.7<br />
62.4<br />
20.7<br />
38.4<br />
27.9<br />
24.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.3<br />
26.1<br />
22.7<br />
2.1<br />
3.5<br />
4.3<br />
4.9<br />
14.3<br />
30.0<br />
2.2<br />
4.9<br />
0.4<br />
1.7<br />
1.8<br />
3.2<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years & above<br />
51.3<br />
59.3<br />
60.4<br />
49.0<br />
56.0<br />
56.8<br />
17.0<br />
33.8<br />
39.5<br />
31.9<br />
22.1<br />
17.3<br />
1.6<br />
1.6<br />
2.0<br />
30.3<br />
20.5<br />
15.3<br />
1.8<br />
2.7<br />
3.9<br />
4.5<br />
4.3<br />
4.7<br />
10.7<br />
26.8<br />
30.9<br />
2.3<br />
3.5<br />
3.7<br />
0.3<br />
1.5<br />
1.1<br />
2.0<br />
2.0<br />
2.6<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
63.3<br />
48.6<br />
66.8<br />
91.4<br />
(74.4)<br />
59.6<br />
46.3<br />
63.8<br />
90.0<br />
(71.8)<br />
41.0<br />
14.3<br />
37.5<br />
73.9<br />
(38.5)<br />
18.5<br />
32.0<br />
26.3<br />
16.1<br />
(30.8)<br />
1.6<br />
1.8<br />
0.4<br />
0.6<br />
(0.0)<br />
16.9<br />
30.1<br />
25.9<br />
15.5<br />
(30.8)<br />
3.4<br />
1.0<br />
8.0<br />
35.0<br />
(5.1)<br />
3.1<br />
4.8<br />
6.7<br />
24.8<br />
(5.1)<br />
34.6<br />
8.4<br />
22.9<br />
14.1<br />
(28.2)<br />
3.6<br />
2.4<br />
3.0<br />
1.4<br />
(2.6)<br />
1.0<br />
0.4<br />
1.8<br />
0.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
2.6<br />
1.9<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
(2.6)<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
59.6<br />
31.7<br />
49.3<br />
60.5<br />
57.2<br />
30.8<br />
47.7<br />
56.8<br />
34.7<br />
18.9<br />
17.5<br />
26.3<br />
22.2<br />
11.8<br />
30.1<br />
30.5<br />
1.4<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
2.0<br />
20.9<br />
11.0<br />
28.9<br />
28.5<br />
4.1<br />
4.1<br />
1.1<br />
2.1<br />
2.1<br />
7.4<br />
5.4<br />
4.1<br />
28.5<br />
7.4<br />
11.1<br />
20.0<br />
2.2<br />
1.0<br />
1.6<br />
3.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.0<br />
1.7<br />
0.9<br />
1.6<br />
2.7<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
41.1<br />
53.3<br />
67.8<br />
39.7<br />
51.2<br />
62.6<br />
13.6<br />
21.1<br />
40.5<br />
26.0<br />
30.0<br />
22.0<br />
0.4<br />
1.7<br />
2.6<br />
25.6<br />
28.3<br />
19.4<br />
1.1<br />
2.4<br />
3.4<br />
2.4<br />
4.9<br />
5.3<br />
10.1<br />
13.8<br />
31.8<br />
1.3<br />
2.1<br />
5.2<br />
0.2<br />
0.4<br />
1.6<br />
1.1<br />
1.8<br />
3.6<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
Availability of health facility<br />
in the village4<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
45.2<br />
53.0<br />
43.0<br />
50.7<br />
17.6<br />
21.9<br />
25.3<br />
28.8<br />
1.9<br />
1.8<br />
23.4<br />
27.0<br />
1.6<br />
2.2<br />
4.3<br />
4.4<br />
11.8<br />
15.2<br />
2.2<br />
2.1<br />
0.2<br />
0.4<br />
1.9<br />
1.7<br />
2,086<br />
5,765<br />
Total<br />
54.8<br />
51.9<br />
24.9<br />
26.9<br />
1.7<br />
25.3<br />
2.4<br />
4.5<br />
18.1<br />
2.8<br />
0.7<br />
2.1<br />
10,308<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
1<br />
. Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom. 2. Include IUD, Pills and Condom. 3 . Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method. @<br />
Literate women with no years of schooling are also included. #Total figure may not add to N due to don’t know and missing cases. 4 Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health<br />
centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and government dispensary within the village.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
102
Figure 6.2<br />
Practice of Family Planning Methods<br />
Pills<br />
5%<br />
IUD<br />
2%<br />
Condom<br />
18%<br />
Male sterilization<br />
2%<br />
Not using any method<br />
45%<br />
Female sterilization<br />
25%<br />
Note: Total percent may add more<br />
than 100.0 due to rounding Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Any tradional<br />
method/other method<br />
3%<br />
having health facility in the village as against 43 percent for women living in villages having no<br />
health facility in the village. The current use of contraception was 49 percent for non-literate<br />
women as against about 57 percent for literate women. The current contraceptive use was the highest<br />
(63 percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (40 percent) for women with low SLI,<br />
while it was 51 percent for women with medium SLI. The current use of contraception was 60<br />
percent for Hindu women as against 46 percent for Muslim women, 64 percent for Sikh women<br />
and 90 percent for Buddhist women, while it was 72 percent for other women. Further, current<br />
use of any spacing method was 21 percent in rural areas as against 38 percent in urban areas. The<br />
use of any spacing methods was the highest (39 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years<br />
and above and the lowest (17 percent) for non-literate women, while it was 34 percent for<br />
women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, use of any spacing method was the highest (40<br />
percent) for women with high SLI and the lowest (14 percent) for women with low SLI, while it<br />
was 21 percent for women with medium SLI.<br />
The use of female sterilization was 26 percent in rural areas as against 23 percent in urban<br />
areas. The use of female sterilization was 17 percent for Hindu women as against 30 percent for<br />
Muslim women, 26 percent for Sikh women and 31 percent for other women, while it was the<br />
lowest (15 percent) for Buddhist women. The use of female sterilization was 21 percent for scheduled<br />
caste women as against 11 percent for scheduled tribe women, while it was 29 percent for OBC<br />
and other caste women. The use of female sterilization was 23 percent for women living in villages<br />
having no health facility in the village as against 27 percent for women living in villages having<br />
health facility in the village. The use of female sterilization was the highest (30 percent) for nonliterate<br />
women and the lowest (15 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above,<br />
while it was over 20 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, use of female<br />
sterilization was the highest (28 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (19<br />
percent) for women with high SLI, while it was 26 percent for women with low SLI.<br />
6.2.1 Current Use of Family Planning Methods by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 6.6 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years currently using any<br />
103
Table 6.6 CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATES BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years currently using any contraceptive method by district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Any<br />
method<br />
Any<br />
modern 1<br />
method<br />
Any modern<br />
spacing 2<br />
method<br />
Male<br />
sterilization<br />
Female<br />
sterilization<br />
IUD<br />
Pill<br />
Condom/<br />
Nirodh<br />
Any<br />
traditional 3<br />
method<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
78.1<br />
40.8<br />
32.5<br />
16.4<br />
73.2<br />
77.6<br />
35.8<br />
32.5<br />
16.2<br />
69.7<br />
20.1<br />
2.3<br />
5.9<br />
8.4<br />
55.7<br />
(0.4)<br />
(0.9)<br />
(0.5)<br />
(0.4)<br />
(2.1)<br />
57.1<br />
32.2<br />
26.0<br />
7.5<br />
11.5<br />
(1.7)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(2.2)<br />
(1.3)<br />
(5.4)<br />
4.8<br />
(0.0)<br />
3.4<br />
(1.6)<br />
4.2<br />
13.6<br />
(2.3)<br />
(0.3)<br />
5.5<br />
46.1<br />
(0.5)<br />
(4.9)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.1)<br />
3.5<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
86.6<br />
48.4<br />
71.1<br />
90.7<br />
72.0<br />
83.4<br />
45.6<br />
64.4<br />
90.5<br />
65.1<br />
53.9<br />
14.2<br />
16.3<br />
75.6<br />
16.7<br />
(0.3)<br />
(0.8)<br />
5.2<br />
(0.5)<br />
6.1<br />
29.2<br />
30.6<br />
42.8<br />
14.4<br />
42.2<br />
10.6<br />
(0.9)<br />
(0.8)<br />
39.2<br />
(0.5)<br />
30.7<br />
(0.8)<br />
11.6<br />
23.3<br />
11.9<br />
12.6<br />
12.5<br />
3.9<br />
13.1<br />
4.3<br />
(3.2)<br />
(2.8)<br />
6.7<br />
(0.2)<br />
6.9<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
51.8<br />
22.7<br />
45.5<br />
55.1<br />
51.5<br />
22.6<br />
41.7<br />
50.9<br />
5.4<br />
6.9<br />
27.3<br />
34.0<br />
(0.3)<br />
(0.2)<br />
(3.0)<br />
(1.4)<br />
45.7<br />
15.6<br />
11.4<br />
15.4<br />
(0.4)<br />
(0.8)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(1.5)<br />
(0.8)<br />
(1.5)<br />
6.0<br />
(2.5)<br />
4.2<br />
4.6<br />
21.3<br />
30.0<br />
(0.3)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(3.8)<br />
3.7<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
54.8<br />
51.9<br />
24.9<br />
1.7<br />
25.3<br />
2.4<br />
4.5<br />
18.1<br />
2.8<br />
1<br />
Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom 2 Include IUD, Pills and Condom<br />
3<br />
Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method. ( ) Based on less than 25 cases<br />
contraceptive method by district. The percentage of eligible women using any contraceptive<br />
method was the highest (91 percent) in Leh district, followed by 87 percent in Kargil district and<br />
the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district, while it was 55 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />
eligible women using any modern contraceptive method was the highest (90 percent) in Leh district,<br />
followed by 83 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (16 percent) in Doda district, while it 52<br />
percent for the state. The percentage of eligible women using any modern spacing method was the<br />
highest (76 percent) in Leh district, followed by 56 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (over<br />
two percent) in Badgam district, while it was 25 percent for the state. The use of male sterilization<br />
was higher than that of the state (two percent) in Jammu, Kupwara, Pulwama and Srinagar<br />
districts and in the remaining 10 districts it was lower than that of the state. The percentage of eligible<br />
women using female sterilization was the highest (57 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by<br />
46 percent in Poonch district and the lowest (over seven percent) in Doda district, while it was 25<br />
percent for the state.<br />
Further, use of IUD/Loop among the eligible women was the highest (39 percent) in Leh<br />
district, followed by 11 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam and<br />
Srinagar districts. The use of Pills among the eligible women was the highest (31 percent) in Kargil<br />
district, followed by 23 percent in Leh district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam district,<br />
while it was over four percent for the state. The use of condom/nirodh was the highest (46 percent)<br />
in Jammu district, followed by 30 percent in Udhampur district and the lowest (less than one<br />
percent) in Badgam district, while it was 18 percent for the state (see Map-6).<br />
6.2.2 Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods by Women<br />
Table 6.7 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years by current use and<br />
ever use of contraception by selected demographic characteristics in the state. The percentage of<br />
1<strong>04</strong>
Table 6.7 USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY WOMEN<br />
Percentage of currently married women age 15-44 years by current use and ever use of contraception according to selected<br />
demographic characteristics, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Demographic<br />
Characteristic<br />
Any modern<br />
method 1<br />
Percentage of women/husbands using<br />
Any<br />
traditionalmethod 2<br />
Any<br />
method<br />
Percentage of women / husbands<br />
by contraceptive status<br />
Not using<br />
any method Ever used Never used<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Age-group<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
7.2<br />
23.5<br />
41.5<br />
54.0<br />
64.9<br />
59.1<br />
0.0<br />
1.3<br />
2.7<br />
2.6<br />
2.6<br />
4.4<br />
7.2<br />
24.8<br />
44.0<br />
56.7<br />
67.7<br />
63.6<br />
92.8<br />
74.6<br />
55.7<br />
43.1<br />
32.2<br />
36.4<br />
12.8<br />
33.6<br />
49.5<br />
62.6<br />
72.0<br />
67.5<br />
87.2<br />
65.0<br />
49.2<br />
36.9<br />
27.3<br />
31.9<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
Surviving children<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3 or more<br />
6.8<br />
37.2<br />
58.1<br />
61.2<br />
1.1<br />
2.7<br />
3.1<br />
3.0<br />
7.9<br />
39.9<br />
61.1<br />
64.3<br />
91.8<br />
59.6<br />
38.8<br />
35.5<br />
15.1<br />
49.8<br />
67.7<br />
67.0<br />
84.2<br />
48.9<br />
31.2<br />
32.5<br />
871<br />
1,637<br />
2,922<br />
4,879<br />
Surviving sons<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2 or more<br />
28.0<br />
55.8<br />
61.3<br />
2.6<br />
2.9<br />
2.8<br />
30.6<br />
58.7<br />
64.1<br />
69.1<br />
41.0<br />
35.8<br />
38.8<br />
64.2<br />
67.8<br />
60.3<br />
34.8<br />
31.6<br />
2,260<br />
3,839<br />
4,209<br />
Surviving daughters<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2 or more<br />
38.1<br />
59.1<br />
57.5<br />
2.6<br />
2.9<br />
2.9<br />
40.7<br />
62.0<br />
60.5<br />
59.1<br />
37.9<br />
39.3<br />
48.4<br />
66.3<br />
64.5<br />
50.7<br />
32.8<br />
34.8<br />
3,269<br />
3,879<br />
3,160<br />
All women<br />
51.9<br />
2.8<br />
54.8<br />
45.0<br />
60.1<br />
39.1<br />
10,308<br />
1<br />
Include Female sterilization, Male sterilization, IUD, Pills and Condom.<br />
2<br />
Include Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal and Other traditional method.<br />
currently married women using any modern method was seven percent in the age group 15-19 years,<br />
23 percent in the age group 20-24 years, 41 percent in the age group 25-29 years, 54 percent in the<br />
age group 30-34 years, 65 percent in the age group 35-39 years, which declines to 59 percent in the<br />
age group 40-44 years. These data have shown that use of contraception increases with increase in<br />
age of the women, and it attains it a peak at 65 percent in the age group 35-39 years and declines<br />
thereafter to 59 percent in the age group 40-44 years. The use of any traditional method was the<br />
lowest (zero percent) in the age group 15-19 years and the highest (over four percent) in the age<br />
group 40-44 years. However, percentage of never users was 87 percent in the age group 15-19 years,<br />
which steadily declines to 27 percent in the age group 35-39 years and increases to 32 percent in the<br />
age group 40-44 years.<br />
It is crucial to understand the association between the number of living children and<br />
contraceptive use. The contraceptive use is high among the women who have three or more surviving<br />
children invariably of methods in the state. The percentage of women having never used any<br />
method of contraception was 84 percent for the women having no surviving children, 49 percent<br />
for women having one surviving child, 31 percent for women having two surviving children and 32<br />
percent for women having three or more surviving children. These data show that percentage of<br />
women who have never used contraception decreases with increase in the number of surviving children.<br />
In other words, percentage of women currently using contraception increases with increase in the<br />
number of surviving children.<br />
105
Further, percentage of women never using contraception was 60 percent for women<br />
having no surviving sons as against 51 percent women having no surviving daughters. On the<br />
other hand, 61 percent women having two or more surviving sons as against 57 percent women<br />
having two or more surviving daughter were currently using contraception. The lower level of<br />
contraception among women having no surviving sons than those women having no surviving<br />
daughters is perhaps due to desire to have a male progeny.<br />
6.2.3 Current Use and Ever Use of Family Planning Methods as Reported by Husbands<br />
Table 6.8 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women by current use and<br />
ever used of contraception by selected demographic variables in the state. The current use of any<br />
method of contraception among the husbands was 21 percent in the age group below 25 years, 39<br />
percent in the age group 25-34 years, 55 percent in the age group 35-44 years and 56 percent in<br />
the age group 45 years and above. These data have shown that use of contraception increases<br />
steadily with increases in the age of husband.<br />
Table 6.8 USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY MEN<br />
Percentage of husband of currently married women by current use and ever use of contraception by selected demographic<br />
variables, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />
Demographic<br />
Percentage of husbands/women using<br />
Characteristics<br />
Any modern method 1 Any traditional method 2 Any method Not using any method<br />
Number of men<br />
Age-group<br />
37 percent husbands having no surviving daughters. Similarly, use of contraception among<br />
husbands was 56 percent for husbands having two or more surviving sons as against 54 percent<br />
husbands having two or more surviving daughters. The lower level of contraception among husbands<br />
having no surviving sons is perhaps due to their desire to have a male progeny.<br />
6.3 Reasons for Not Using Male Methods<br />
The DLHS-RCH asked husbands of currently married women about the contraceptive methods that<br />
he or his wife was using currently. The husbands who were not using male methods were further<br />
asked the reasons for it. Table 6.9 gives percentage of husbands with their choice of family planning<br />
methods and reasons for not using male methods by residence in the state. The percentage of<br />
husbands who reported female methods was 54 percent in the state – 59 percent in rural areas<br />
and 44 percent in urban areas. The reasons given for not preferring the male methods were ‘fear<br />
of impotency’ (six percent), ‘lack of sexual pleasure’ (five percent), ‘fear of method failure’ (five<br />
percent), ‘fear of operation’ (13 percent), ‘fear of weakness’ (29 percent) and ‘female methods<br />
are more popular’ (65 percent). The main reasons for not using male methods are ‘fear of operation’<br />
and ‘fear of weakness’.<br />
Table 6.9 REASONS FOR NOT USING MALE METHODS<br />
Percentage of husbands with their choice of family planning methods and reasons for not accepting male methods according to<br />
residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Female method users and reason for not accepting male methods<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Percentage of husband who have reported female methods<br />
54.4<br />
59.0<br />
44.2<br />
Number of men<br />
5,378<br />
3,713<br />
1,665<br />
Reasons for not accepting male methods*<br />
Fear of impotency<br />
Lack of sexual pleasure<br />
Fear of method failure<br />
Fear of operation<br />
Fear of weakness<br />
Female methods are more popular<br />
Other<br />
5.6<br />
5.2<br />
5.1<br />
12.8<br />
28.8<br />
65.2<br />
5.1<br />
5.2<br />
4.9<br />
4.5<br />
12.2<br />
28.4<br />
65.6<br />
4.9<br />
6.7<br />
6.1<br />
6.8<br />
14.7<br />
29.9<br />
63.8<br />
5.6<br />
Number of men<br />
2,927<br />
* Percentages may add to more than 100.0 because multiple responses could be recorded.<br />
2,191<br />
736<br />
6.4 Source of Contraceptive Methods<br />
Table 6.10 gives percent distribution of current users of modern contraceptive methods by<br />
method and source of supply in the state. These services are provided by government health<br />
institutions, private hospitals and clinics, as well as by non-government organisations (NGOs). The<br />
data shows that 88 percent female sterilizations were performed at the government health facility, 11<br />
percent at the private health facility and the remaining at other health facility. Similarly, 85 percent<br />
of male sterilizations were performed at the government health facility, 11 percent at the private<br />
health facility and the remaining at other health facility. More than 90 percent sterilization operations<br />
performed at the government health institutions were performed at the ‘Government/Municipal<br />
hospitals’. Among the IUD/Loop users, 45 percent reported the source as government/municipal<br />
hospital and 25 percent from the CHC/PHC and six percent from FP/RCH camp and sub-centre.<br />
Sixty-four percent of the acceptors received their supplies and services from government health<br />
107
facility, eight percent from private health facility and 24 percent from chemist and others. Figure<br />
6.3 gives source of family planning among current users of modern contraceptive methods.<br />
Figure 6.3<br />
Source of Family Planning Among Current<br />
Users of Modern Contraceptive Methods<br />
Other<br />
1%<br />
Don't<br />
know/missing<br />
3%<br />
Chemist<br />
23%<br />
Private<br />
8%<br />
Government<br />
64%<br />
Note: Total percent may add more<br />
than 100.0 due to rounding<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Table 6.10 SOURCE OF MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS<br />
Percent distribution of current users of modern contraceptive methods by method and source of supply, Jammu &<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Source<br />
Government medical centre<br />
Government/Municipal hospital<br />
CHC/PHC<br />
Sub-centre<br />
Government doctor<br />
Government nurse/ ANM<br />
Family planning/RCH camp<br />
Mobile clinic<br />
Female<br />
sterilization<br />
87.6<br />
77.4<br />
2.8<br />
1.8<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
4.8<br />
0.5<br />
Male<br />
sterilization<br />
Contraceptive method<br />
85.4<br />
67.6<br />
8.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
1.1<br />
8.4<br />
0.0<br />
IUD/<br />
Loop<br />
76.2<br />
45.0<br />
25.0<br />
0.7<br />
3.4<br />
0.6<br />
1.5<br />
0.0<br />
Pills<br />
44.6<br />
23.0<br />
11.9<br />
4.7<br />
0.2<br />
0.7<br />
3.1<br />
0.9<br />
Condom<br />
/ Nirodh<br />
31.6<br />
18.9<br />
5.2<br />
4.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.4<br />
1.8<br />
0.2<br />
All modern<br />
methods 1<br />
63.8<br />
50.5<br />
5.6<br />
2.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.3<br />
3.6<br />
0.4<br />
Private medical centre<br />
Private hospital<br />
Private doctor<br />
Private nurse<br />
10.6<br />
7.8<br />
2.8<br />
0.1<br />
10.6<br />
6.0<br />
4.5<br />
0.0<br />
20.4<br />
8.6<br />
8.4<br />
3.4<br />
5.4<br />
0.9<br />
4.5<br />
0.0<br />
3.1<br />
1.1<br />
1.5<br />
0.5<br />
8.0<br />
4.8<br />
2.8<br />
0.4<br />
Chemist<br />
Other<br />
Do not know<br />
Missing<br />
NA<br />
1.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.2<br />
NA<br />
2.4<br />
1.6<br />
0.0<br />
NA<br />
3.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.4<br />
47.5<br />
1.5<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
55.5<br />
0.9<br />
7.5<br />
1.3<br />
23.4<br />
1.4<br />
2.8<br />
0.6<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of users<br />
2,603<br />
174 248 463 1,861 5,349<br />
1<br />
Includes female sterilization, male sterilization, IUD, Pills or condom. CHC: Community health centre, PHC: Primary<br />
health centre. NA: Not applicable.<br />
6.5 Problems with Current Use of Contraceptive Methods<br />
Women who were using a modern contraceptive method were asked if they had experienced any<br />
108
problems related with the current methods they are using. Table 6.11 gives percentage of women<br />
informed about side effects, had side effects with the method by use of method in the state.<br />
The percentage of women who were informed about all the available methods was 52 percent in<br />
the state. The percentage of women who were informed about the side effects before adoption was 43<br />
percent for female sterilization, 50 percent for IUD/Loop and 53 percent for Pills. Further, percentage<br />
of women who had side effect/health problem due to use of method was 12 percent for female<br />
sterilization, 12 percent for IUD/Loop and over three percent for Pills. The most common health<br />
problems experienced by sterilized women ‘weakness/inability to work’ (51 percent), ‘body ache/<br />
backache’ (86 percent), ‘cramps’ four percent), ‘weight gain’ (14 percent), ‘dizziness’ (one percent),<br />
nausea/vomiting’ (less than one percent), ‘breast tenderness’ (one percent), ‘irregular periods’ (three<br />
percent), ‘excessive bleeding’ (over two percent), ‘spotting’ (less than one percent) and ‘white<br />
discharge’ (one percent). Similarly, most common health problems experienced by IUD/Loop users<br />
were ‘weakness/inability to work’ (32 percent), ‘body ache/backache’ (42 percent), ‘weight gain’ (21<br />
percent), ‘dizziness’ (26 percent), ‘nausea/vomiting’ (five percent), ‘irregular periods’ (five percent)<br />
and ‘excessive bleeding’ (five percent).<br />
Table 6.11 HEALTH PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT USE OF CONTRACEPTION<br />
Percentage of women informed about side effects, had side effects with the method by use of method, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>Health</strong> problems/side effect<br />
Type of method<br />
Female sterilizations IUD/loop Pill<br />
Women who were informed about all the available methods<br />
51.9<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Women who were informed about the side effects before adoption of the method<br />
43.4<br />
50.2<br />
53.2<br />
Women who had side effect/health problem due to use of contraceptive method<br />
12.2<br />
11.8<br />
3.3<br />
Number of current users<br />
2,603<br />
248<br />
463<br />
Type of health problems/side effects 1<br />
Weakness/inability to work<br />
Body ache/ backache<br />
Cramps<br />
Weight gain<br />
Dizziness<br />
Nausea/vomiting<br />
Breast tenderness<br />
Irregular periods<br />
Excessive bleeding<br />
Spotting<br />
White discharge<br />
Other<br />
51.3<br />
86.0<br />
3.9<br />
14.0<br />
0.7<br />
0.3<br />
0.9<br />
2.7<br />
2.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.9<br />
0.6<br />
(31.6)<br />
(42.1)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(21.1)<br />
(26.3)<br />
(5.3)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(5.3)<br />
(5.3)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.0)<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Number of users with side effects<br />
317<br />
29<br />
15<br />
1<br />
Percentages may add to more than 100.0 because multiple problems could be recorded.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases. * Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />
6.6 Treatment for <strong>Health</strong> Problems with Current Use of Contraception<br />
Table 6.12 gives percentage of women who had side effects and sought treatment, follow-up<br />
and satisfaction with the method by use of method in the state. The percentage of women who had<br />
follow-up visit by health worker after adoption of the method was 11 percent for female sterilization<br />
users, 16 percent for IUD/Loop users and eight percent for Pills users. Further, percentage of women<br />
who were satisfied with method of current use was 94 percent for female sterilization users, 90<br />
percent for IUD/Loop users and 94 percent for Pills users. The percentage of women who sought<br />
109
Table 6.12 FOLLOW-UP VISIT AND SOUGHT TREATMENT FOR HEALTH PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT USE OF<br />
CONTRACEPTION<br />
Percentage of women who had follow-up visit, satisfaction with the method of current use and sought treatment of side effects due<br />
to use of method, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>Health</strong> problems/side effect<br />
Type of method<br />
Female sterilizations IUD/loop Pill<br />
Women who had follow up visit by health worker after adoption of method<br />
10.7<br />
16.0<br />
7.6<br />
Women who are satisfied with method of current use<br />
93.6<br />
90.3<br />
94.4<br />
Number of current users<br />
2,603<br />
248<br />
463<br />
Women who sought treatment for the health problem<br />
85.3<br />
(73.7)<br />
*<br />
Number of women with side effects<br />
317<br />
29<br />
15<br />
Source of treatments<br />
Government health facility<br />
Government hospital/dispensary<br />
UHC/UHP/UFWC<br />
CHC/<strong>Rural</strong> hospital<br />
PHC<br />
Sub-centre<br />
90.7<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
6.5<br />
1.4<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Private health facility<br />
Private hospital/clinic<br />
15.3<br />
*<br />
*<br />
ISM health facility 1<br />
Chemist/Medical shop<br />
Home remedy<br />
9.7<br />
6.8<br />
1.6<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Number of women with side effects<br />
270<br />
24<br />
12<br />
1<br />
Either government or Private. * Percentages not shown: based on very few cases. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
treatment for the health problem was 85 percent for female sterilization users, 74 percent for<br />
IUD/Loop users, while none of the Pills users sought treatment of their health problem.<br />
The percentage of women using female sterilization who sought treatment for contraceptive<br />
use related problems from government health facility was 100 percent, from private health facility<br />
15 percent, from ISM facility 10 percent and seven percent from chemist/medical shop, while two<br />
percent women tried home remedy. In other words, one-third of the women sought treatment of<br />
their problems from more than one health facility. However, none of the IUD/Loop and Pills users,<br />
who experienced contraceptive use related problem, sought treatment of health problem.<br />
6.7 Advice to Non-Users to Use Contraception<br />
Table 6.13 gives percentage of current non-users who were advised by the ANM/health worker to<br />
use contraception by suggested method according to place of residence and availability of health<br />
facility in the village in the state. The percentage of currently non-users advised by ANM/health<br />
worker to use contraceptive method was six percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and<br />
seven percent in urban areas. The percentage of current non-users advised by ANM/health worker<br />
to use contraceptive method was three percent for the non-users living in villages having no health<br />
facility in the village as against seven percent for the non-users living in villages having health<br />
facility in the village. The percentage of women who were advised to use contraception were advised<br />
female sterilization (41 percent), male sterilization (22 percent), IUD/Loop (10 percent), Pills (12<br />
percent) and condom/nirodh (eight percent). The rural-urban differential in the contraceptive methods<br />
advised to women is apparent for all the methods.<br />
110
Table 6.13 ADVICE ON CONTRACEPTIVE USE<br />
Percentage of current non-users* who were advised by the ANM/health worker to use contraception by suggested method<br />
according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the village, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Advise/future intension to use<br />
Percentage of current non-users advised by ANM/ health<br />
worker to use of contraceptive method<br />
Total<br />
5.9<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility in the village 1<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
5.6<br />
7.3<br />
3.1<br />
6.6<br />
Number of non-users<br />
4,306<br />
3,558<br />
749<br />
1,056<br />
2,502<br />
Percent distribution of women who were advised by method<br />
Female sterilization<br />
Male sterilization<br />
IUD/loop<br />
Pill<br />
Condom/Nirodh<br />
Rhythmic /periodic abstinence<br />
Missing<br />
41.0<br />
22.5<br />
9.7<br />
11.6<br />
8.0<br />
0.8<br />
6.3<br />
46.5<br />
21.5<br />
7.7<br />
14.3<br />
3.6<br />
1.0<br />
5.4<br />
21.2<br />
26.2<br />
17.1<br />
1.8<br />
23.8<br />
0.0<br />
9.9<br />
(42.3)<br />
(11.5)<br />
(15.4)<br />
(15.4)<br />
(7.7)<br />
(3.8)<br />
(3.8)<br />
48.1<br />
24.1<br />
6.4<br />
13.4<br />
2.9<br />
0.8<br />
4.4<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of non-users<br />
252<br />
198 55<br />
32<br />
* Exclude women in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-centre, primary health centre, community health centre or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village. ( ) Based on les than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
165<br />
6.7.1 Future Intentions<br />
Table 6.14 gives percentage of current non-users who intended to use contraception in future by<br />
preferred method by residence in the state. The percentage of women who intend to use<br />
contraceptive in future was 15 percent in the state irrespective of place of residence. Similarly,<br />
percentage of husbands who intend to use contraceptive in future was 15 percent in the state - 14<br />
percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas.<br />
Table 6.14 FUTURE INTENTION TO USE<br />
Percentage of current non-users* who were intended to use contraception in future by preferred method according to place of<br />
residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Future intention to use/method<br />
Percentage of respondents who intend to use<br />
contraceptive in future<br />
Women<br />
Husband<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
14.7<br />
14.7<br />
15.0<br />
14.9<br />
13.9<br />
20.2<br />
Number of non-users<br />
4,306<br />
3,558<br />
749<br />
4,797<br />
4,024<br />
772<br />
Percent distribution of non-user who were preferred to<br />
use family methods by preferred method<br />
Female sterilization<br />
Male sterilization<br />
IUD/copper-T/loop<br />
Oral pills<br />
Condom/Nirodh<br />
Rhythm/periodic abstinence<br />
Withdrawal<br />
Other<br />
Missing<br />
75.3<br />
4.7<br />
2.7<br />
3.5<br />
10.8<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
0.1<br />
2.7<br />
75.4<br />
4.4<br />
2.5<br />
4.2<br />
9.9<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.1<br />
3.2<br />
74.5<br />
6.0<br />
3.8<br />
0.0<br />
14.8<br />
0.0<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.5<br />
64.6<br />
7.8<br />
1.7<br />
1.0<br />
18.3<br />
0.8<br />
2.3<br />
1.7<br />
1.8<br />
67.9<br />
8.5<br />
1.4<br />
1.3<br />
13.9<br />
0.8<br />
2.9<br />
1.5<br />
1.9<br />
52.8<br />
5.3<br />
2.6<br />
0.0<br />
33.9<br />
1.0<br />
0.1<br />
2.6<br />
1.8<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of non-users<br />
611<br />
500<br />
111<br />
702<br />
548<br />
154<br />
* Exclude women who are in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />
111
Among the women who intended to use permanent methods of contraception, 75 percent<br />
preferred female sterilization as against five percent who preferred male sterilization. In case of<br />
temporary methods, the preferred methods by women were IUD/Loop (three percent), Oral pills<br />
(over three percent), condom/nirodh (11 percent), rhythm/periodic abstinence (less than one percent),<br />
withdrawal (less than one percent) and other (less than one percent).<br />
Among the husbands who intended to use contraception in the future, 65 percent preferred<br />
female sterilization as against eight percent who preferred male sterilization. In case of temporary<br />
methods, the preferred methods by husbands were IUD/Loop (two percent), Oral pills (one percent),<br />
condom/nirodh (18 percent), rhythm/periodic abstinence and withdrawal (less than one percent).<br />
The female sterilization appears to be the most preferred method for use in future both<br />
by women and men. Among the spacing methods, condom/nirodh appears to be the most preferred<br />
method for use in future both by men and women.<br />
6.7.2 Future Intention to Use Among Women by Number of Living Children<br />
Currently married women who were not using any contraceptive method at the time of survey<br />
were asked about their intentions to use a method in the future. Those women who intended to use<br />
contraceptives in the future were further asked about preferred methods. This type of information<br />
helps the managers and programmers to identify the potential groups of future users and to provide<br />
the type of contraceptives that are likely to be in demand. Table 6.15 gives the percentage<br />
distribution of currently married women who were not currently using ant contraceptive method<br />
by intention to use in future, according to number of living children and residence in the state.<br />
Among the current non-users, only four percent women intended to use contraception within the<br />
next 12 months; three percent women wanted to use within one to two years and eight percent<br />
women intended to use contraceptive method after two years. Over 54 percent women were not<br />
sure of their intention to use, while over 31 percent women do not intend to use contraception in<br />
future. Further, 59 percent of the women who have no living children said that they are yet to<br />
decide about the use of contraceptives.<br />
6.8 Reasons for Discontinuation and Non-Use of Contraception<br />
Currently married non-pregnant women who were not using any contraceptive method at the<br />
time of survey were categorised as past users and never users according to their contraceptive<br />
experience. In DLHS-RCH, women who had discontinued contraceptive use were asked about<br />
the main reason for discontinuation. And women who had never used contraceptives were asked<br />
about the main reason for not doing so. Table 6.16 gives percent distribution of women who were<br />
past users by reasons for discontinuation of the contraceptive method by place of residence in the<br />
state. The main reason for the discontinuation of contraception was ‘wanted child’ for 69 percent<br />
of the women in the state – 63 percent in rural areas and 84 percent in urban areas. Other reasons<br />
for discontinuation of contraception were ‘method failed/became pregnant’ (one percent), ‘weakness/<br />
inability to work’ (over one percent),‘body ache/backache’ (two percent),‘dizziness’ (over one percent),<br />
‘breast tenderness’ (five percent), ‘irregular periods’ (three percent), ‘spotting’ (one percent), ‘lack of<br />
pleasure’ (10 percent) and ‘method was inconvenient’ (two percent).<br />
112
Table 6.15 FUTURE USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY NUMBER OF LIVING CHILDREN<br />
Percent distribution of currently married women* who were not currently using any contraceptive method by intention to use in the<br />
future, according to number of living children and residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Intention to use in the future<br />
Intends to use in next 12 months<br />
One to two years<br />
More than two years<br />
Does not intend to use<br />
Not yet decided<br />
Missing<br />
1.3<br />
2.1<br />
1.8<br />
35.7<br />
58.9<br />
0.2<br />
Number of living children<br />
0 1 2 3 4+<br />
2.2<br />
3.6<br />
10.5<br />
24.2<br />
59.1<br />
0.3<br />
Total<br />
4.0<br />
3.6<br />
9.0<br />
28.3<br />
55.1<br />
0.1<br />
4.8<br />
3.1<br />
8.4<br />
33.8<br />
49.9<br />
0.0<br />
6.2<br />
1.9<br />
9.2<br />
39.5<br />
43.2<br />
0.0<br />
Total<br />
3.6<br />
3.0<br />
8.0<br />
31.5<br />
53.7<br />
0.1<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
Intends to use in next 12 months<br />
One to two years<br />
More than two years<br />
Does not intend to use<br />
Not yet decided<br />
Missing<br />
751<br />
1.3<br />
2.3<br />
2.2<br />
33.7<br />
60.3<br />
0.2<br />
939<br />
1.7<br />
3.7<br />
10.5<br />
24.8<br />
59.0<br />
0.4<br />
1,067<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
2.6<br />
3.8<br />
9.0<br />
29.5<br />
55.1<br />
0.0<br />
845<br />
4.9<br />
2.8<br />
8.8<br />
32.8<br />
50.6<br />
0.0<br />
703<br />
5.8<br />
1.5<br />
10.1<br />
39.4<br />
43.1<br />
0.0<br />
4,306<br />
3.2<br />
2.9<br />
8.4<br />
31.6<br />
53.7<br />
0.1<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
Intends to use in next 12 months<br />
One to two years<br />
More than two years<br />
Does not intend to use<br />
Not yet decided<br />
Missing<br />
568<br />
1.3<br />
1.7<br />
0.6<br />
41.4<br />
54.9<br />
0.0<br />
740<br />
4.4<br />
3.6<br />
10.6<br />
22.0<br />
59.5<br />
0.0<br />
894<br />
Urban<br />
10.8<br />
2.5<br />
8.6<br />
22.3<br />
55.0<br />
0.8<br />
731<br />
3.9<br />
4.7<br />
5.8<br />
39.8<br />
45.6<br />
0.1<br />
624<br />
8.9<br />
4.7<br />
2.5<br />
39.7<br />
44.1<br />
0.0<br />
3,558<br />
5.5<br />
3.2<br />
6.1<br />
31.4<br />
53.6<br />
0.2<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
183<br />
199<br />
173<br />
* Exclude women who are in menopause or those who have undergone hysterectomy.<br />
115<br />
79<br />
749<br />
Table 6.16 REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION OF CONTRACEPTION<br />
Percent distribution of women who were past users (current non-users) by reason for discontinuation of the contraceptive method<br />
according to place of residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Reasons<br />
Reason for discontinuation<br />
Wanted child<br />
Method failed/became pregnant<br />
Supply not available<br />
Difficult to get method<br />
Weakness/inability to work<br />
Body ache/ Backache<br />
Cramps<br />
Dizziness<br />
Breast tenderness<br />
Irregular periods<br />
Spotting<br />
White discharge<br />
Lack of pleasure<br />
Method was inconvenient<br />
Other<br />
Missing<br />
Total percent<br />
Number of past users<br />
Total<br />
68.7<br />
0.7<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
1.5<br />
2.2<br />
0.3<br />
1.4<br />
5.2<br />
3.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
10.1<br />
1.9<br />
2.8<br />
0.7<br />
100.0<br />
553<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Place of residence<br />
63.1<br />
0.8<br />
0.5<br />
0.3<br />
0.3<br />
3.0<br />
0.4<br />
1.9<br />
6.1<br />
3.4<br />
0.8<br />
0.3<br />
13.7<br />
0.7<br />
3.8<br />
1.0<br />
100.0<br />
407<br />
Urban<br />
84.2<br />
0.3<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
5.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.9<br />
2.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
5.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
100.0<br />
146<br />
113
6.8.1 Reasons for Not Using Contraceptive Methods<br />
Table 6.17 gives percentage of current non-users who were currently not using contraceptive<br />
method by reason according to place of residence in the state. The percentage of women and<br />
husbands who were currently not using any contraception reported main reasons for not using<br />
contraceptives were as ‘lack of knowledge about FP method’ (2-5 percent), ‘against the religion’<br />
(41-54 percent), ‘opposed to family planning’ (4-14 percent), ‘not like existing method’ (0-3<br />
percent), ‘afraid of sterilization’ (2-3 percent), ‘can not work after sterilization’ (0-2 percent),<br />
‘worry about side effects’ (8-13 percent), ‘cost too much’ (0-1 percent), ‘ health does not permit<br />
(0-1 percent), ‘inconvenient to use method’ (0-2 percent) and ‘difficult to become pregnant’ (3-7<br />
percent). <strong>Rural</strong>-urban differentials are serious in respect of ‘against the religion’, ‘opposed to<br />
family planning’ and ‘worry about side effects’.<br />
Table 6.17 REASON FOR NOT USING CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD<br />
Percentage of current non-users who were currently not using contraceptive method by reason according to place of residence,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Reason<br />
Lack of Knowledge about FP method<br />
Against the Religion<br />
Opposed to family planning<br />
Not like existing method<br />
Afraid of sterilization<br />
Can not work after sterilization<br />
Worry about side effects<br />
Costs too much<br />
<strong>Health</strong> does not permit<br />
Hard/inconvenient to get method<br />
Inconvenient to use method<br />
Difficult to become pregnant<br />
Wife is pregnant1<br />
Other<br />
Missing<br />
Women<br />
Husband*<br />
Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
4.9<br />
41.2<br />
13.9<br />
2.1<br />
2.1<br />
1.3<br />
12.2<br />
0.3<br />
1.0<br />
0.1<br />
1.3<br />
6.7<br />
-<br />
11.0<br />
1.9<br />
4.5<br />
44.2<br />
14.6<br />
2.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.3<br />
11.4<br />
0.1<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
5.2<br />
-<br />
11.6<br />
2.0<br />
7.0<br />
25.4<br />
10.0<br />
0.2<br />
6.6<br />
1.6<br />
16.8<br />
0.9<br />
2.5<br />
0.3<br />
5.3<br />
14.3<br />
-<br />
7.7<br />
1.4<br />
2.8<br />
53.6<br />
4.5<br />
0.1<br />
2.3<br />
0.0<br />
8.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.<br />
0.2<br />
3.6<br />
0.1<br />
1.2<br />
22.5<br />
2.8<br />
56.4<br />
4.4<br />
0.1<br />
2.5<br />
0.0<br />
8.2<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.6<br />
0.0<br />
1.1<br />
21.2<br />
2.6<br />
35.0<br />
5.1<br />
0.0<br />
1.5<br />
0.0<br />
10.5<br />
0.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
1.6<br />
10.1<br />
0.6<br />
1.2<br />
31.4<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of current non-users<br />
2,750<br />
2,311<br />
439<br />
1,839<br />
1,598<br />
241<br />
1<br />
Not applicable for women. * Excluding not decided cases on timing of next child.<br />
6.9 Unmet Need for Family Planning Services<br />
Unmet need for family planning is one of the indicators to assess the effectiveness of the family<br />
planning programme. Policy makers and family planning programme administrators use this to<br />
know the demand for family planning services/supplies. Unmet need is defined separately for<br />
limiting and spacing. Unmet need for spacing includes the proportion of currently married women<br />
who are neither in menopause nor had hysterectomy nor are currently pregnant and who want more<br />
children after two years or later and are currently not using any family planning method. The<br />
women who are not sure about whether and when to have next child, are also included in unmet<br />
need for spacing. The women who are not sure about the timing of the next child are also<br />
included in the unmet need for spacing. Unmet need for limiting includes the proportion of<br />
currently married women who are neither in menopause nor had hysterectomy nor are currently<br />
pregnant and do not want any more children but are currently not using any family planning<br />
method. Total unmet need refers to the totality of unmet for limiting and spacing.<br />
114
Table 6.18 gives percentage of currently married women with unmet need for family<br />
planning services by selected background characteristics. The unmet need for family planning<br />
was 25 percent in the state – 27 percent in rural areas and 17 percent in urban areas. Further,<br />
unmet need for spacing family was 14 percent in the state – 15 percent in rural areas and 11<br />
percent in urban areas. Similarly, unmet need for limiting family was 11 percent in the state – 12<br />
percent in rural areas and six percent in urban areas.<br />
Table 6.18 UNMET NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES<br />
Percentage of currently married women with unmet need for family planning services by selected background characteristics,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background Characteristic<br />
Age<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Illiterate<br />
0-9 @ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Others<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Others<br />
Number of living children<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4+<br />
Standard of living Index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
All women<br />
Unmet need for FP<br />
Spacing 1 Limiting 2 Total<br />
5.4<br />
20.9<br />
18.6<br />
16.2<br />
11.1<br />
5.4<br />
15.0<br />
11.0<br />
15.6<br />
11.9<br />
11.8<br />
8.8<br />
17.6<br />
7.7<br />
2.6<br />
(7.7)<br />
9.5<br />
8.6<br />
18.7<br />
14.8<br />
9.8<br />
18.6<br />
14.8<br />
11.0<br />
15.5<br />
10.3<br />
18.4<br />
8.9<br />
14.1<br />
16.8<br />
12.6<br />
8.3<br />
10.4<br />
9.6<br />
15.5<br />
12.2<br />
6.0<br />
12.9<br />
8.7<br />
6.2<br />
7.9<br />
12.8<br />
3.2<br />
0.6<br />
(5.1)<br />
9.4<br />
33.9<br />
10.7<br />
5.8<br />
14.4<br />
10.6<br />
9.1<br />
11.3<br />
10.7<br />
20.1<br />
10.0<br />
4.9<br />
10.7<br />
22.2<br />
33.5<br />
27.0<br />
26.6<br />
20.7<br />
21.0<br />
27.2<br />
17.0<br />
28.5<br />
20.6<br />
18.0<br />
16.7<br />
30.4<br />
10.9<br />
3.2<br />
(12.8)<br />
18.9<br />
42.5<br />
29.4<br />
20.6<br />
24.2<br />
29.2<br />
23.9<br />
22.3<br />
26.1<br />
30.4<br />
28.4<br />
13.8<br />
24.8<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
871<br />
1,637<br />
2,922<br />
2,750<br />
2,129<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
10,308<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
1<br />
Unmet need for spacing includes the proportion of currently married women who are neither in menopause or had<br />
hysterectomy nor are currently pregnant and who want more children after two years or later and are currently not using any<br />
family planning method. The women who are not sure about whether and when to have next child are also included in unmet<br />
need for spacing.<br />
2<br />
Unmet need for limiting includes the proportion of currently married women who are neither in menopause or had hysterectomy<br />
nor are currently pregnant and do not want any more children but are currently not using any family planning method. Total<br />
unmet need refers to unmet for limiting and spacing.<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included. # The total figure may not add to N due to do not know and<br />
missing cases. ( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
115
Unmet need for family planning was the highest (33 percent) for women aged 20-24 years,<br />
followed by 27 percent for women aged 25-29 years and the lowest (21 percent) for women aged 35<br />
years and above, while it was 25 percent for the state. Unmet need for family planning was 17<br />
percent for Hindu women as against 30 percent for Muslim women, 11 percent for Sikh women and<br />
13 percent for other women, while it was only three percent for Buddhist women. The unmet need<br />
for family planning was the highest (42 percent) for scheduled tribe women, followed by 29 percent<br />
for OBC women and the lowest (19 percent) for scheduled caste women. The unmet need for family<br />
planning was the highest (29 percent) for women with one living child, followed by 26 percent for<br />
women with four or more living children and the lowest (22 percent) for women with three living<br />
children, while it was it was 24 percent for women with no living children.<br />
The unmet need for family planning was the highest (28 percent) for non-literate women<br />
and the lowest (18 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 21<br />
percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly, unmet need for family planning was<br />
the highest (30 percent) for women with low SLI and the lowest (14 percent) for women with<br />
high SLI, while it was 28 percent for women with medium SLI. These data suggest that there<br />
exists negative association between percentage of unmet need for family planning and education<br />
and standard of living index of the women<br />
6.9.1 Unmet Need for Family Planning Services by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 6.19 gives percentage of currently married women with unmet need by district in Jammu<br />
& Kashmir State. The unmet need for spacing of family was the highest (53 percent) in Baramula<br />
district, followed by 22 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />
Poonch and Rajouri districts. The unmet need for limiting family was the highest (60 percent) in<br />
Doda district, followed by 43 percent in Rajauri district and the lowest (less than one percent) in<br />
Kargil and Leh districts. The unmet need for family planning was the highest (66 percent) in<br />
Doda district, followed by 59 percent in Baramula district and the lowest (three percent) in Leh<br />
district, while it was 25 percent for the state.<br />
Table 6.19 UNMET NEED BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of currently married women with unmet need by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Unmet need for<br />
Spacing Limiting Total<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
5.8<br />
20.4<br />
52.8<br />
6.3<br />
4.8<br />
2.3<br />
2.9<br />
6.5<br />
59.6<br />
3.4<br />
8.2<br />
23.3<br />
59.3<br />
65.9<br />
8.1<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
7.6<br />
22.1<br />
8.9<br />
2.7<br />
9.1<br />
0.3<br />
7.8<br />
3.3<br />
0.5<br />
3.3<br />
7.9<br />
29.9<br />
12.2<br />
3.1<br />
12.4<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.4<br />
0.5<br />
14.4<br />
11.2<br />
30.7<br />
43.0<br />
5.7<br />
9.2<br />
31.2<br />
43.6<br />
20.1<br />
20.4<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
14.1<br />
10.7<br />
24.8<br />
116
Map-6<br />
Current Use of Any Family Planning Method<br />
117
118
CHAPTER VII<br />
ACCESSIBILITY AND PERCEPTION ABOUT GOVERNMENT<br />
HEALTH FACILITIES<br />
The government health facilities at all the levels provide various RCH services. Auxiliary Nurse<br />
Midwife (ANM), family planning worker or male health worker play a key role in delivering<br />
the services to the community. <strong>Health</strong> workers are expected to make regular visits to all the<br />
households in their assigned area. During these contacts, the health workers are supposed to<br />
monitor various aspects of health of the women and children, provide information related to<br />
health and family planning, counsel and motivate to adopt appropriate health and family planning<br />
practices, and deliver other selected services. These contacts are also important as they enhance<br />
the creditability of services and establish necessary rapport with the clients. In order to assess<br />
the extent of utilisation of government health facilities by all eligible women and to find out<br />
whether ANM/health workers reach the households for providing RCH services, a separate<br />
section in the women’s questionnaire was canvassed to all the eligible women. This chapter<br />
deals with accessibility and opinion of women about the services provided by the government<br />
health workers. The quality of care offered by the government health programme as perceived<br />
by currently married women is also presented.<br />
7.1 Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Workers<br />
Table 7.1 gives percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV or male<br />
health worker during three months prior to the survey. The health worker home visited only<br />
three percent of the women at least once in the last three months preceding the survey in the<br />
state – about four percent in rural areas and over one percent in urban areas. Over two percent<br />
of women aged 15-24 years as against over three percent of women aged 25 years and above<br />
were home visited by the health worker. The health worker home visited more of Hindu women<br />
than women from other religious group. Similarly, health worker home visited more of scheduled<br />
caste women than women from other caste groups. The health worker home visited four percent<br />
of women who had studied for 0-9 years as against three percent of non-literate women and<br />
also women who had studied for 10 years and above. Again, health worker home visited over<br />
four percent of women living in villages having no health facility in the village as against one<br />
percent of women living in villages having health facility in the village.<br />
Women who reported a home visit during the three months preceding the survey were<br />
asked who visited their household during the past three months and whether they were satisfied<br />
with the kind of services/advice received, and the time spent by these health workers. Among<br />
women who received services at home, doctor visited 13 percent women, ANM/LHV visited<br />
54 percent women and male health worker visited 37 percent women. Doctor visited more of<br />
women in urban areas and male health worker visited more of women in rural areas. Seventysix<br />
percent of women who received services at home were satisfied with the time spent with<br />
them and 90 percent of women were satisfied with the services or advice given to them.<br />
The percentage of women who were satisfied with the amount of time spent, and advice<br />
provided by health workers varied across various background characteristics. Eighty-three percent<br />
of women aged 25-34 years as against 66 percent women aged 35-44 years reported satisfaction
Table 7.1 HOME VISIT BY HEALTH WORKER<br />
Percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male health worker in the 3 months preceding the<br />
survey, among women who had home visit, satisfied with time spent by health workers and with services provided by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Percentage<br />
with home<br />
visit<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Doctor<br />
Home visit by 1<br />
ANM /<br />
LHV<br />
Male<br />
health<br />
worker<br />
Percentage of<br />
women satisfied with<br />
Amount<br />
of time<br />
Services/<br />
advices<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Age<br />
15.24<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
2.3<br />
3.2<br />
3.1<br />
897<br />
5,101<br />
4,310<br />
*<br />
9.2<br />
18.4<br />
*<br />
61.5<br />
44.1<br />
*<br />
32.0<br />
44.0<br />
*<br />
83.3<br />
65.6<br />
*<br />
92.7<br />
85.1<br />
20<br />
161<br />
132<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
3.6<br />
1.4<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
10.5<br />
34.5<br />
54.2<br />
55.6<br />
39.0<br />
19.8<br />
79.2<br />
49.7<br />
90.4<br />
86.3<br />
280<br />
33<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
2.8<br />
3.9<br />
3.0<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
13.4<br />
6.7<br />
19.1<br />
44.2<br />
66.0<br />
68.2<br />
46.5<br />
33.8<br />
15.4<br />
78.8<br />
83.1<br />
61.5<br />
89.9<br />
93.0<br />
86.9<br />
174<br />
72<br />
67<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Christian<br />
Jain<br />
4.2<br />
2.4<br />
2.3<br />
1.3<br />
0.8<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
10.2<br />
14.6<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
76.1<br />
32.1<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
16.8<br />
58.0<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
75.6<br />
77.3<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
94.2<br />
85.8<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
152<br />
153<br />
6<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Caste/tribe#<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
4.1<br />
1.5<br />
2.3<br />
3.1<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
1.9<br />
*<br />
8.5<br />
14.1<br />
76.3<br />
*<br />
30.7<br />
61.3<br />
22.8<br />
*<br />
66.9<br />
27.5<br />
85.7<br />
*<br />
90.7<br />
76.3<br />
95.9<br />
*<br />
94.1<br />
92.1<br />
48<br />
21<br />
40<br />
184<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Availability of health<br />
facility2 in the village<br />
3.1<br />
3.1<br />
2.8<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
16.0<br />
9.9<br />
17.1<br />
66.3<br />
55.1<br />
43.2<br />
23.3<br />
38.5<br />
44.8<br />
69.3<br />
81.1<br />
71.3<br />
81.7<br />
91.0<br />
94.5<br />
66<br />
166<br />
81<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
4.5<br />
1.0<br />
5,764<br />
2,086<br />
9.9<br />
*<br />
53.9<br />
*<br />
39.8<br />
*<br />
78.6<br />
*<br />
89.8<br />
*<br />
260<br />
21<br />
Total<br />
3.0<br />
10,308<br />
13.1<br />
54.4<br />
36.9<br />
76.1<br />
89.9<br />
314<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
1<br />
Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses. @ Literate mother with no years of schooling are included.<br />
# Total number may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
2<br />
Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village.<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />
with the time spent by health workers. Similarly, 93 percent of women aged 25-34 years as<br />
against 85 percent women aged 35-44 years reported satisfaction with services/advices given<br />
by the health workers during home visit. Seventy-nine percent women in rural areas as against<br />
50 percent women in urban areas were satisfied with the time spent by health workers during<br />
home visits. Similarly, 90 percent women in rural areas as against 86 percent women in urban<br />
areas were satisfied with the time spent by health workers during home visits. The time spent<br />
by health workers during home visit was the highest (83 percent) for women who had studied<br />
120
for 0-9 years and the lowest (61 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above,<br />
while it was 79 percent for non-literate women. The time spent by health workers during home<br />
visit was the highest (81 percent) for women with medium SLI and the lowest (69 percent) for<br />
women with low SLI, while it was 71 percent for women with high SLI. The percentage of<br />
women who were satisfied with services/advices given by health workers during home visit<br />
was 93 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against 87 percent for women<br />
who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was 90 percent for non-literate women.<br />
Similarly, percentage of women who were satisfied with services/advices given by health<br />
workers during home visit was 94 percent for women with high SLI as against 91 percent for<br />
women with medium SLI, while it was 82 percent for women with low SLI.<br />
7.2 Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Workers by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 7.2 gives percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male<br />
health worker during three months preceding the survey, among women who had home visit,<br />
satisfied with time spent and with services provided by health workers and district in the state.<br />
The percentage of women who were home visited was the highest (10 percent) in Udhampur<br />
district, followed by over eight percent in Srinagar district and the lowest (zero percent) in<br />
Baramula and Kathua districts. The percentage of women who were home visited by the<br />
doctor was the highest (66 percent) in Leh district, followed by 42 percent in Rajouri district<br />
and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag, Badgam and Kargil districts, while it was 13 percent<br />
for the state. Similarly, percentage of women who were home visited by ANM/LHV was the<br />
highest (100 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 84 percent in Kupwara<br />
district and the lowest (five percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 54 percent for the state.<br />
Again, percentage of women who were home visited by the male health worker was the<br />
highest (100 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 78 percent in Srinagar district and the<br />
lowest (11 percent) in Jammu, Kupwara and Pulwama districts, while it was 37 percent for the<br />
state. Figure 7.1 shows distribution of districts by home visit by health worker.<br />
Figure 7.1<br />
Distribution of <strong>District</strong>s by Home Visit by <strong>Health</strong> Worker<br />
Below 10<br />
14%<br />
2 <strong>District</strong><br />
20 & above<br />
66%<br />
10 <strong>District</strong><br />
10-19.9<br />
20%<br />
3 <strong>District</strong><br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Further, percentage of women home visited by the health workers who were satisfied with<br />
the time spent with them was the highest (100 percent) in Kargil and Poonch districts, followed<br />
121
Table 7.2 HOME VISIT BY HEALTH WORKER BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of women who had home visit by a doctor, ANM/LHV, or male health worker in the 3 months preceding the<br />
survey, among women who had home visit, satisfied with time spent by health workers and with services provided by district,<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
Percentage with<br />
home visit<br />
0.1<br />
1.7<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
5.3<br />
1.0<br />
0.0<br />
2.3<br />
1.6<br />
2.4<br />
1.6<br />
0.8<br />
8.5<br />
9.6<br />
Home visit by 1<br />
Percentage of women satisfied with<br />
Doctor ANM / LHV Male health worker Time spent Service<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.0)<br />
-<br />
(38.8)<br />
9.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
-<br />
(4.6)<br />
(66.0)<br />
(9.4)<br />
(14.3)<br />
(41.6)<br />
18.5<br />
6.0<br />
(100.0)<br />
(74.6)<br />
-<br />
(53.0)<br />
78.9<br />
(100.0)<br />
-<br />
(84.3)<br />
(56.6)<br />
(79.8)<br />
(30.4)<br />
(70.8)<br />
5.0<br />
79.1<br />
(100.0)<br />
(25.4)<br />
-<br />
(54.6)<br />
11.1<br />
(55.4)<br />
-<br />
(11.0)<br />
(20.3)<br />
(10.8)<br />
(55.3)<br />
(41.6)<br />
77.6<br />
23.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
(92.4)<br />
-<br />
(37.1)<br />
73.2<br />
(100.0)<br />
-<br />
(96.5)<br />
(88.0)<br />
(95.6)<br />
(100.0)<br />
(27.0)<br />
69.3<br />
87.4<br />
(100.0)<br />
(92.4)<br />
-<br />
(53.0)<br />
97.7<br />
(100.0)<br />
-<br />
(100.0)<br />
(100.0)<br />
(100.0)<br />
(90.1)<br />
(85.4)<br />
77.8<br />
93.7<br />
Jammu & Kashmir 3.0 13.1 54.4<br />
36.9<br />
76.1<br />
89.9<br />
1<br />
Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses. ( ) Based on less number of cases. - Not Applicable.<br />
by 96 percent in Kupwara and Pulwama districts and the lowest (zero percent) in Anantnag<br />
district, while it was 76 percent for the state. The percentage of women home visited by the<br />
health workers who were satisfied with services rendered was the highest (100 percent) in<br />
Anantnag, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh and Pulwama districts, followed by 98 percent in Jammu<br />
district and the lowest (78 percent) in Srinagar district, while it was 90 percent for the state.<br />
7.3 Matters Discussed during Home visits or Visits to <strong>Health</strong> Facilities<br />
Women who were visited at home by a family planning worker, as well as those who visited<br />
government health facility or other health facility during the three months preceding the survey<br />
were asked about the different topics discussed with the workers during any of these visits.<br />
Table 7.3 gives percentage of women who were visited by health worker during three months<br />
preceding the survey, and percentage of women who visited health facility, and the percentage<br />
of women who discussed specific topics with the health workers in the state. The percentage<br />
of pregnant woman or women with children born during the reference period who were home<br />
visited by the health workers said that topics discussed during the visit were ‘family planning’ (48<br />
percent),‘breastfeeding’ (24 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (13 percent),’immunization’ (60<br />
percent), ‘nutrition’ (32 percent),‘disease prevention’ (19 percent),‘treatment of health problem’<br />
(12 percent),‘antenatal care’ (seven percent),‘delivery care’ (nine percent),‘postpartum care’ (six<br />
percent),’childcare’ (32 percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (19 percent) and ‘oral rehydration’ (three<br />
percent).<br />
The percentage of current contraceptive users women who were home visited by the health<br />
workers during the reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family<br />
planning, (34 percent),’breastfeeding’ (eight percent),’supplementary feeding’ (three percent),<br />
’immunization’ (33 percent),’nutrition’ (eight percent),’disease prevention’ (19 percent),’treatment<br />
of health problem’ (23 percent),’antenatal care’ (five percent),’delivery care’ (five percent),<br />
’postpartum care’ (one percent), ‘childcare’ (seven percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (14 percent),<br />
and ’oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />
122
Table 7.3 MATTER DISCUSSED DURING CONTACT WITH A HEALTH WORKER<br />
Percentage of women who were visited by health worker in the three months preceding the survey, and percentage of<br />
women who visited health facility, and the percentage of women 1 who discussed specific topics with the health worker,<br />
Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Topic discussed<br />
Pregnant women or<br />
women with children after<br />
reference period 2<br />
Other women<br />
Current<br />
contraceptive users<br />
Current<br />
nonusers<br />
Total<br />
During home visit<br />
Family planning<br />
Breastfeeding<br />
Supplementary feeding<br />
Immunization<br />
Nutrition<br />
Diseases prevention<br />
Treatment of health problem<br />
Antenatal care<br />
Delivery care<br />
Postpartum care<br />
Childcare<br />
Sanitation / cleanliness<br />
Oral rehyderation<br />
Other<br />
48.1<br />
24.3<br />
13.5<br />
60.5<br />
32.0<br />
18.9<br />
12.4<br />
7.2<br />
9.4<br />
5.6<br />
32.0<br />
19.4<br />
2.6<br />
0.0<br />
33.7<br />
8.1<br />
2.8<br />
33.2<br />
7.7<br />
19.4<br />
22.6<br />
5.3<br />
4.7<br />
0.6<br />
6.9<br />
13.6<br />
4.0<br />
1.4<br />
72.6<br />
6.3<br />
0.0<br />
13.7<br />
18.8<br />
20.6<br />
18.1<br />
11.3<br />
6.7<br />
1.7<br />
19.5<br />
7.8<br />
6.4<br />
2.9<br />
43.9<br />
13.0<br />
5.8<br />
39.1<br />
17.0<br />
19.4<br />
18.7<br />
6.8<br />
6.5<br />
2.4<br />
16.7<br />
14.6<br />
3.9<br />
1.2<br />
Number of women<br />
100<br />
169<br />
45<br />
314<br />
During visit to health facility<br />
Family planning<br />
Breastfeeding<br />
Supplementary feeding<br />
Immunization<br />
Nutrition<br />
Diseases prevention<br />
Treatment of health problem<br />
Antenatal care<br />
Delivery care<br />
Postpartum care<br />
Childcare<br />
Sanitation / cleanliness<br />
Oral rehyderation<br />
Other<br />
13.5<br />
10.8<br />
5.8<br />
18.9<br />
18.7<br />
12.5<br />
36.6<br />
30.0<br />
14.7<br />
7.2<br />
16.5<br />
2.8<br />
1.7<br />
3.3<br />
16.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.6<br />
4.6<br />
2.8<br />
30.8<br />
52.2<br />
8.5<br />
1.6<br />
1.3<br />
4.1<br />
2.4<br />
4.1<br />
4.3<br />
21.5<br />
6.4<br />
4.6<br />
9.1<br />
9.7<br />
11.8<br />
45.3<br />
25.9<br />
11.1<br />
0.0<br />
8.1<br />
4.5<br />
0.9<br />
4.8<br />
16.6<br />
6.1<br />
3.8<br />
11.1<br />
10.1<br />
20.4<br />
44.2<br />
20.0<br />
8.8<br />
3.9<br />
9.7<br />
3.2<br />
2.7<br />
4.1<br />
Number of women<br />
224<br />
246<br />
Note: Percentage add to more than 100.0 due to multiple responses.<br />
1<br />
Women who visited private health facility are not included.<br />
2<br />
Reference period for phase I, January 1 st 1999 and for phase II, January 1 st .2001<br />
88<br />
566<br />
The percentage of current non-users women who were home visited by the health workers<br />
during the reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family planning,<br />
(73 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),’supplementary feeding’ (zero percent),’immunization’<br />
(14 percent),’nutrition’ (19 percent),’disease prevention’ (21 percent),’treatment of health problem’<br />
(18 percent),’antenatal care’ (11 percent),’delivery care’ (seven percent), ’postpartum care’ (two<br />
percent), ‘childcare’ (19 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (eight percent), ’oral rehydration’ (six<br />
percent).<br />
The percentage of women who were home visited by the health workers during the<br />
reference period said that topics discussed during home visit were ‘family planning, (44<br />
percent),’breastfeeding’ (13 percent),’supplementary feeding’ (six percent),’immunization’ (39<br />
percent),’nutrition’ (17 percent),’disease prevention’ (19 percent),’treatment of health problem’ (19<br />
percent), ’antenatal care’ (seven percent),’delivery care’ (six percent), ’postpartum care’ (two percent),<br />
‘childcare’ (17 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (15 percent), and ’oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />
123
The percentage of pregnant woman or women with children born during the reference<br />
period who visited the health facility said that topics discussed during the visit were ‘family<br />
planning’ (13 percent),‘breastfeeding’ (11 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (six percent), ’immunization’<br />
(19 percent),‘nutrition’ (19 percent),‘disease prevention’ (12 percent),‘treatment of health problem’<br />
(37 percent),‘antenatal care’ (30 percent),‘delivery care’ (15 percent),‘postpartum care’ (seven<br />
percent),’childcare’ (16 percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (three percent) and ‘oral rehydration’<br />
(two percent).<br />
The percentage of current-user woman who visited the health facility said that topics discussed<br />
during the visit were ‘family planning’ (16 percent),‘supplementary feeding’ (one percent),<br />
’immunization’ (five percent),‘nutrition’ (three percent),‘disease prevention’ (31 percent),‘treatment<br />
of health problem’ (52 percent),‘antenatal care’ (eight percent),‘delivery care’ (two percent),<br />
‘postpartum care’ (one percent),’childcare’ (four percent),‘sanitation/cleanliness’ (two percent) and<br />
‘oral rehydration’ (four percent).<br />
The percentage of current non-users women who visited the health facility said that topics<br />
discussed during the visit were ‘family planning, (21 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),<br />
‘supplementary feeding’ (five percent),’immunization’ (nine percent),’nutrition’ (10 percent),’disease<br />
prevention’ (12 percent),’treatment of health problem’ (45 percent),’antenatal care’ (26 percent),<br />
’delivery care’ (11 percent), ‘childcare’ (eight percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’ (four percent) and<br />
’oral rehydration’ (one percent).<br />
The percentage of women who visited the health facility said that topics discussed during<br />
visit were ‘family planning, (17 percent),’breastfeeding’ (six percent),’supplementary feeding’<br />
(four percent),’immunization’ (11 percent),’nutrition’ (10 percent),’disease prevention’ (20<br />
percent),’treatment of health problem’ (44 percent),’antenatal care’ (20 percent),’delivery care’<br />
(nine percent), ’postpartum care’ (four percent), ‘childcare’ (10 percent),’sanitation/cleanliness’<br />
(three percent) and ’oral rehydration’ (three percent).<br />
7.4 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility<br />
Table 7.4 gives percentage of women who needed to visit health facility and visited health facility<br />
by type of health facility, according to place of residence and availability of health facility in the<br />
village. The data shows that percentage of women who needed to visit health facility but not<br />
visited was 37 percent in the state – 41 percent in rural areas and 25 percent in urban areas. The<br />
percentage of women who needed to visit health facility but not visited was 36 percent for women<br />
living in villages having no health facility in the village as against 53 percent for women living in<br />
villages having health facility in the village. Similarly, percentage of women who needed to visit<br />
health facility and visited was 10 percent in the state – eight percent in rural areas and 15 percent<br />
in urban areas. The percentage of women who visited government health facility visited ‘Hospital/<br />
CHC/FRU/RH (38 percent), ‘dispensary’ (four percent), ‘PHC’ (six percent) and ‘sub-centres’<br />
(six percent). The percentage of women who visited private health facility visited ‘private<br />
hospital’ (29 percent) and ‘private dispensary’ (13 percent), while over three percent women visited<br />
ISM facility (over two percent) and other health facility (less than one percent).<br />
7.5 Visit to <strong>Health</strong> Facility by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 7.5 gives percentage of women who needed to visit health facility, but not visited and<br />
124
Table 7.4 VISIT TO HEALTH FACILITY<br />
Percentage of women who need to visit health facility and visited, and percent distribution of women visited health facility by type of<br />
health facility and according to place of residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>Health</strong> facility<br />
Total<br />
Residence<br />
Availability of health facility 1 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Percentage of women who needed to visit<br />
health facility and not visited<br />
37.1<br />
40.8<br />
25.1<br />
36.5<br />
52.7<br />
Percentage of women who needed to visit<br />
health facility and visited<br />
9.9<br />
8.2<br />
15.5<br />
8.2<br />
8.0<br />
Number of women<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
5,764<br />
2,086<br />
Government health facility<br />
Hospital / CHC / FRU /RH<br />
Dispensary<br />
Primary health center<br />
Sub-center<br />
38.3<br />
4.0<br />
5.6<br />
6.1<br />
30.8<br />
4.7<br />
6.6<br />
9.6<br />
51.0<br />
2.9<br />
3.9<br />
0.2<br />
35.5<br />
7.4<br />
6.2<br />
4.1<br />
29.1<br />
3.7<br />
6.8<br />
11.5<br />
Private health facility<br />
Hospital<br />
Dispensary<br />
29.0<br />
13.2<br />
27.9<br />
16.4<br />
31.0<br />
7.7<br />
24.5<br />
17.3<br />
29.1<br />
16.1<br />
ISM 2 hospital/dispensary<br />
2.5<br />
3.4<br />
0.9<br />
3.6<br />
3.3<br />
Other<br />
0.7<br />
0.0<br />
1.9<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
1,017<br />
640<br />
377<br />
167<br />
473<br />
CHC: Community health center, FRU: First referral unit, RH: Referral Hospital<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village 2 Either government or private health facility of Indian System of Medicine<br />
Note: Total includes 6 missing cases in place of visits who were not shown separately.<br />
percentage of women who visited health facility by district in the state. The percentage of women<br />
who needed to visit health facility but not visited was the highest (94 percent) in Doda district,<br />
followed by over 90 percent in Poonch and Rajouri districts and the lowest (seven percent) in<br />
Badgam district, while it was 37 percent for the state. The percentage of women who needed to<br />
visit health facility and visited was the highest (21 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 20<br />
percent in Udhampur district and the lowest (one percent) in Doda and Poonch districts, while<br />
it was 10 percent for the state. Further, percentage of women who visited government health<br />
facility was the highest (100 percent) in Leh district, followed by 93 percent in Rajouri district<br />
and the lowest (22 percent) in Anantnag district, while it was 55 percent for the state. The<br />
percentage of women who visited private health facility was the highest (76 percent) in Anantnag<br />
district, followed by over 50 percent in Baramula and Kupwara districts and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Leh and Poonch districts, while it was 44 percent for the state.<br />
7.6 Client’s Perception of Quality of Government <strong>Health</strong> Services<br />
Utilization of services is an essential indicator reflecting the quality of services. Better quality of<br />
services would have a higher utilization rate, which is very important from the policy point of view.<br />
Unless clients are satisfied with the services provided by the government, efforts made by the<br />
government will be wasted. In order to assess the utilization of government health facilities, a<br />
question was asked ‘During last three months did you visit any health facility for any of your<br />
health problem’. Those who visited the government health facility were asked their perceptions<br />
125
Table 7.5 VISIT TO HEALTH FACILITY BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of women who needed to visit health facility, but not visited and percentage of women who visited health facility by<br />
type of health facility by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong>s<br />
Percentage of women who<br />
need to visit health facility,<br />
but not visited<br />
Percentage of women<br />
who need to visit health<br />
facility and visited<br />
Percentage of women who visited to<br />
Government health<br />
facility<br />
Private health facility<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
22.9<br />
7.2<br />
21.8<br />
94.3<br />
26.2<br />
12.8<br />
6.2<br />
4.0<br />
1.0<br />
11.5<br />
22.4<br />
60.2<br />
49.4<br />
(61.1)<br />
58.7<br />
75.9<br />
39.8<br />
50.6<br />
(38.9)<br />
39.3<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
12.4<br />
20.4<br />
20.1<br />
15.7<br />
20.4<br />
21.0<br />
10.3<br />
15.2<br />
8.4<br />
15.2<br />
65.2<br />
60.0<br />
49.7<br />
100.0<br />
51.4<br />
34.8<br />
40.0<br />
50.3<br />
0.0<br />
48.6<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
90.4<br />
90.8<br />
43.4<br />
44.3<br />
0.7<br />
3.2<br />
5.0<br />
20.4<br />
(83.0)<br />
92.7<br />
70.0<br />
61.3<br />
(0.0)<br />
7.3<br />
25.8<br />
38.2<br />
Jammu & Kashmir.<br />
37.1<br />
9.9<br />
55.1<br />
43.6<br />
( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />
about quality of services such as personal manner like courtesy, respect, sensitivity, and friendliness<br />
of the physician and staff, technical skills and quality like thoroughness, carefulness, and<br />
competence and waiting time for receiving the services, which are presented in Table 7.6.<br />
Women who visited government health facility and rated quality and availability of services<br />
as good and excellent as ‘convenience of the health facility location’ (64 percent),‘length of<br />
time spent towards waiting’ (62 percent),’personal manner of the physician’ (84 percent),’<br />
technical skills and quality of physician’ (84 percent),’personal manner of nurse’ (72 percent),<br />
’technical skills and quality of nurse’ (72 percent),’personal manner of other staff’ (73<br />
percent),’technical skills and quality of other staff’ (71 percent),’explanation of what was<br />
done to her’ (67 percent),’medical, surgical and diagnostic equipment’ (66 percent) and ‘general<br />
comforts’ (55 percent). These data have shown that the respondents, who visited government<br />
health facility, were generally satisfied with the services and facilities, including general<br />
comfort, available there.<br />
7.7 Reason for not visiting Government <strong>Health</strong> Centre<br />
Women who visited the private health centre were asked the main reason for not visiting the<br />
government health centre and the results are presented in Table 7.7. The reason given are ‘not<br />
conveniently located’ (eight percent),’time is not suited’ (two percent),’poor quality of service,<br />
(15 percent),’heavy rush’ (23 percent),’non/rare availability of doctors/health workers’ (12 percent),<br />
’doctors/health workers do not examine properly, (18 percent),’medicine not/rarely given or of<br />
bad quality’ (seven percent),’doctors/paramedical staff does not behave properly’ (13 percent),<br />
’services are charged’ (less than one percent) and ‘referred by government doctor’ (over one percent).<br />
7.8 Family Planning Information and Advice Received<br />
Table 7.8 gives percentage of current non-users who were ever advised by ANM/health worker<br />
126
Table 7.6 QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT HEALTH FACILITY<br />
Percentage of women who visited government health facility and rated quality and availability of services during most recent<br />
visit to a government health facility in the three months proceeding the survey, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Quality indicator Poor Good Excellent<br />
The convenience of the health facility location<br />
Length 1 of time spend towards waiting<br />
Personal manner 2 of the physician 5<br />
The technical skills and quality 3 of the physician 5<br />
Personal manner 2 of nurse<br />
The technical skills and quality 3 of nurse<br />
Personal manner of other staff 5<br />
The technical skills and quality of other 4 staff<br />
The explanation of what was done to her<br />
Medical, surgical and diagnostic equipment<br />
General comfort<br />
33.3<br />
31.3<br />
14.1<br />
14.4<br />
24.6<br />
24.8<br />
25.4<br />
26.0<br />
27.3<br />
26.7<br />
35.0<br />
61.0<br />
61.5<br />
79.5<br />
80.4<br />
70.6<br />
68.0<br />
69.6<br />
65.0<br />
63.2<br />
64.1<br />
53.8<br />
2.8<br />
0.9<br />
4.7<br />
3.2<br />
1.5<br />
3.7<br />
3.0<br />
5.8<br />
3.9<br />
1.5<br />
1.4<br />
1<br />
Poor indicate long waiting time, good indicate average waiting time, and excellent indicate short waiting time<br />
2<br />
Courtesy, respect, sensitivity, friendliness.<br />
3<br />
Thoroughness, carefulness, competence.<br />
4<br />
Including paramedical staff.<br />
5<br />
Includes hospital/community health center/ first referral unit/ referral hospital, dispensary, and primacy health center last<br />
visit made by women<br />
Table 7.7 REASON FOR NOT PREFERRING GOVERNMENT HEALTH FACILITY<br />
Percent distribution of women visited private health facility by reason for not visiting government health facility and according<br />
to residence and availability of health facilities in the village, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Reason<br />
Total<br />
Availability of health<br />
Residence<br />
facility 1 in the village<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> Urban No Yes<br />
Not conveniently located<br />
Time is not suited<br />
Poor quality of services<br />
Heavy rush<br />
Non/rare-availability of doctors/health workers<br />
Doctors/health workers do not examine properly<br />
Medicine not/rarely given or of bad quality<br />
Doctors/paramedical staff does not behave properly<br />
Services are charged<br />
Referred by government doctor<br />
Other<br />
7.8<br />
1.6<br />
15.4<br />
23.2<br />
12.2<br />
18.4<br />
6.6<br />
12.6<br />
0.2<br />
1.3<br />
0.7<br />
3.2<br />
0.9<br />
15.9<br />
23.7<br />
14.5<br />
19.3<br />
5.4<br />
15.2<br />
0.4<br />
1.1<br />
0.6<br />
17.4<br />
3.1<br />
14.4<br />
22.1<br />
7.5<br />
16.7<br />
8.9<br />
7.5<br />
0.0<br />
1.6<br />
0.8<br />
1.9<br />
0.0<br />
21.7<br />
34.0<br />
0.0<br />
21.4<br />
5.9<br />
15.1<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
3.6<br />
1.2<br />
13.9<br />
20.3<br />
19.4<br />
18.6<br />
5.3<br />
15.2<br />
0.5<br />
1.5<br />
0.8<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
446<br />
300<br />
146<br />
76<br />
224<br />
1<br />
Includes sub-center, primary health center, Community health center or referral hospital, government hospital, and<br />
government dispensary within the village<br />
to adopt family planning method by method of family planning by residence in the state. The<br />
percentage of non-users who were advised to adopt family planning method was six percent<br />
in the state – six percent in rural areas and seven percent in urban areas. The family planning<br />
methods advised were ‘female sterilization’ (41 percent),’male sterilization’ (22 percent),<br />
’IUD’ (10 percent),’pills’ (11 percent) and ‘condom’ (eight percent). The rural-urban differential<br />
exists for all the modern methods. Only one percent of the current non-users were advised<br />
rhythm/periodic abstinence.<br />
7.9 Availability of Pills and Condom<br />
To explore difficulties faced in the procurement of condoms and pills, current users of these<br />
127
Table 7.8 ADVISE TO ADOPT FAMILY PLANNING METHOD<br />
Percentage of current non-users who reported ever advised to adopt family planning method by method of family planning by<br />
ANM/health worker, according to residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Method Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Percentage of non-users who were advised to adopt family planning method<br />
5.9<br />
5.6<br />
7.3<br />
Number of women<br />
4,306<br />
3,558<br />
749<br />
Method<br />
Female sterilization<br />
Male sterilization<br />
IUD<br />
Pills<br />
Condom<br />
Rhythem/periodic abstinence<br />
Missing<br />
41.0<br />
22.5<br />
9.7<br />
11.6<br />
8.0<br />
0.8<br />
6.3<br />
46.5<br />
21.5<br />
7.7<br />
14.3<br />
3.6<br />
1.0<br />
5.4<br />
21.2<br />
26.2<br />
17.1<br />
1.8<br />
23.8<br />
0.0<br />
9.9<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
252<br />
198<br />
55<br />
methods were asked whether they had been able to get their supply whenever needed? The<br />
results are presented in Table 7.9. The percentage of condom users who had a problem in<br />
getting supply was over16 percent in the state – 15 percent in rural areas and over 21 percent<br />
in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of Pills users who had a problem in getting supply was<br />
seven percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and 10 percent in urban areas. A higher<br />
proportion of urban women than rural women had problems in getting a supply of condom<br />
and Pills.<br />
Table 7.9 AVAILABILITY OF REGULAR SUPPLY OF CONDOMS/PILLS<br />
Percentage of current condom or pill users who ever had a problem getting a supply of condoms/pills by residence, Jammu<br />
and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Method/residence Percentage who had a problem getting supply Number of users<br />
Condom<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Total<br />
Pills<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Total<br />
5.6<br />
9.6<br />
7.2<br />
1,124<br />
737<br />
1,861<br />
Note: Total includes 3 cases with missing information from condom and 32 cases from pills were not shown separately.<br />
7.10 Quality of Care of Family Planning Services<br />
Table 7.10 gives percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other<br />
modern method by the source where they get sterilized, according to source of sterilization<br />
and residence in the state. The percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed<br />
about other modern methods by the government health facility where they got sterilized was<br />
54 percent in the state – 56 percent in rural areas and 45 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />
current users of sterilization who were informed about other modern methods by the family<br />
planning or RCH camp/village secession where they got sterilized was 29 percent in the state –<br />
31 percent in rural areas and 23 percent in urban areas. The percentage of current users of<br />
sterilization who were informed about other modern methods by the private health facility<br />
14.7<br />
21.5<br />
16.5<br />
341<br />
121<br />
463<br />
128
Table 7.10 INFORMATION OF OTHER MODERN METHOD BEFORE STERILIZATION<br />
Percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other modern method by the source where they get<br />
sterilized, according to the source of sterilization and residence, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Source of sterilization Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Government health facility<br />
Family planning or RCH camp/ village session<br />
Private health facility<br />
Other<br />
Total<br />
54.2<br />
28.6<br />
48.2<br />
(48.0)<br />
52.1<br />
56.5<br />
30.6<br />
48.8<br />
(40.0)<br />
54.4<br />
45.0<br />
23.0<br />
45.5<br />
(60.0)<br />
Note: Total includes 12 women who said that they do not know of place/source of sterilization, are not shown separately.<br />
( ) Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
43.6<br />
Number<br />
of users<br />
where they got sterilized was 48 percent in the state – 49 percent in rural areas and 45 percent<br />
in urban areas. The percentage of current users of sterilization who were informed about other<br />
modern methods by all the source where they got sterilized was 52 percent in the state – 54<br />
percent in rural areas and 44 percent in urban areas.<br />
Table 7.11 gives percentage of current users of modern contraceptive methods who<br />
were told about side effects or other problems of current method by a health worker or ANM/<br />
Nurse at the time of accepting the method, and percentage who received follow-up services<br />
after accepting the method by current method and residence in the state. The percentage of<br />
current users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other<br />
problems of current method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the<br />
method was 43 percent for the acceptors of sterilization, 27 percent for the users of other<br />
method and 35 percent for the acceptor of any modern method. Further, percentage of current<br />
users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other problems of<br />
current method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the method and<br />
percentage who received follow-up services after adopting the method was over 10 percent for<br />
sterilization, six percent for other modern method and over eight percent for any modern method.<br />
Table 7.11 INFORMATION ON SIDE EFFECT AND FOLLOW-UP FOR CURRENT METHOD<br />
Percentage of current users of modern contraceptive methods who were told about side effects or other problems of current<br />
method by a health worker or ANM/Nurse at the time of accepting the method and percentage who received follow-up<br />
services after accepting the method by current method and residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Information/follow-up Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Told about side effects<br />
Sterilization<br />
Other modern method<br />
Any modern method<br />
43.0<br />
26.7<br />
35.1<br />
42.9<br />
30.1<br />
37.4<br />
43.3<br />
20.8<br />
29.4<br />
2,276<br />
139<br />
294<br />
43<br />
2,777<br />
Received follow-up<br />
Sterilization<br />
Other modern method<br />
Any modern method<br />
10.5<br />
5.9<br />
8.3<br />
9.0<br />
5.9<br />
7.7<br />
16.1<br />
5.8<br />
9.8<br />
7.11 Quality of Care Indicators for Contraceptive Users by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 7.12 gives percentage of currently married women who are current users of modern<br />
contraceptive method, quality of care indicators related to use of current contraceptive method<br />
by district. The percentage of women informed about other methods before getting sterilization<br />
was the highest (90 percent) in Doda district, followed by 83 percent in Kupwara district and<br />
the lowest(10 percent) in Kathua district, while it was35 percent for the state. The percentage of<br />
129
Table 7.12 QUALITY OF CARE INDICATORS FOR CONTRACEPTIVE USERS BY DISTRICT<br />
Among currently married women who are current users of modern contraceptive methods, quality of care indicators related to<br />
the use of their current contraceptive method by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Percentage informed<br />
about other methods<br />
before getting<br />
sterilization 1<br />
Percentage told about side<br />
effects or other problems with<br />
method 2<br />
Sterilization<br />
Other modern<br />
method<br />
Percentage who received<br />
follow –up 2<br />
Sterilization<br />
Other modern<br />
method<br />
Percentage nonuser<br />
told ever had<br />
advised to adopt<br />
contraceptive<br />
method<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
54.2<br />
41.9<br />
11.6<br />
90.1<br />
61.9<br />
66.2<br />
36.6<br />
16.3<br />
98.5<br />
29.3<br />
50.2<br />
(27.4)<br />
31.9<br />
9.5<br />
23.6<br />
10.5<br />
26.0<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
14.5<br />
11.9<br />
(12.6)<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
4.4<br />
17.8<br />
4.4<br />
0.8<br />
0.2<br />
12.9<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
38.7<br />
10.0<br />
83.5<br />
57.1<br />
81.4<br />
27.3<br />
3.8<br />
70.8<br />
44.5<br />
66.9<br />
39.4<br />
1.5<br />
74.0<br />
35.6<br />
74.1<br />
20.9<br />
3.0<br />
15.1<br />
32.0<br />
14.2<br />
36.4<br />
1.6<br />
6.4<br />
38.5<br />
8.2<br />
4.0<br />
11.1<br />
14.3<br />
2.8<br />
13.0<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
82.5<br />
26.9<br />
72.0<br />
26.7<br />
3.8<br />
52.1<br />
42.0<br />
35.2<br />
5.9<br />
30.4<br />
23.4<br />
19.0<br />
1.1<br />
0.7<br />
12.0<br />
18.5<br />
3.7<br />
3.6<br />
0.4<br />
4.6<br />
2.5<br />
1.5<br />
6.8<br />
7.3<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
35.1<br />
43.0<br />
1<br />
At the time of accepting the current method.<br />
2<br />
By a health worker or ANM/Nurse after accepting the current method. ( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />
26.7<br />
10.5<br />
5.9<br />
11.1<br />
current users of sterilization who were told about side effects or other problems related with use<br />
of method was the highest (98 percent) in Doda district, followed by 71 percent in Kupwara<br />
districts and the lowest (four percent) in Kathua and Poonch districts, while it was 43 percent<br />
for the state. Similarly, percentage of current users of other modern methods who were told<br />
about side effects or other problems related with use of method was the highest (74 percent) in<br />
Kupwara and Pulwama district, followed by 50 percent in Anantnag district and the lowest<br />
(over one percent) in Kathua district, while it was 27 percent for the state.<br />
Further, percentage of current users of sterilization who received follow-up services<br />
was the highest (32 percent) in Leh district, followed by 26 percent in Badgam district and the<br />
lowest (zero percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was over 10 percent for the state.<br />
The percentage of current users of other modern method who received follow-up services was<br />
the highest (38 percent) in Leh district, followed by 36 percent in Kargil district and the lowest<br />
(zero percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was six percent for the state. Again,<br />
percentage of non-users who had never been advised to adopt contraceptive method was the<br />
highest (18 percent) in Anantnag district, followed by 14 percent in Kupwara district and the<br />
lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district, while it was 11 percent for the state.<br />
7.12 Quality of Care of Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Care<br />
Information on few other aspects of quality of care in terms of maternal care was also collected.<br />
Women with last live/still births during three years preceding the survey were asked whether<br />
the Doctor/ANM/health worker advised you to go to health facility for delivery when they<br />
were pregnant, and received any follow-up care after delivering the baby within 2 weeks of<br />
delivery and received follow care at least one visit within six weeks of delivery. The same<br />
130
information is presented in Table 7.13. The percentage of women who were advised to have<br />
delivery at health facility was 53 percent in the state – 52 percent in rural areas and 55 percent<br />
in urban areas. The percentage of women who were visited within two weeks of delivery was<br />
over five percent in the state irrespective of the place of residence. The percentage of women<br />
who were visited at least once within six week was 28 percent in the state – 23 percent in rural<br />
areas and 47 percent in urban areas.<br />
Table 7.13 ADVISED TO HAVE DELIVERY AT HEALTH FACILITY AND FOLLOW-UP SERVICES FOR POSTPARTUM<br />
CHECK-UP<br />
Percentage of women* who were advised to have delivery at health facility by doctor/ health worker and percentage who<br />
receive follow-up services within 2 weeks and within 6 weeks of delivery by ANM, according to residence, Jammu and<br />
Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Advise/follow-up service Total <strong>Rural</strong> Urban<br />
Percentage of women who were advised to have delivery at health facility<br />
52.8<br />
52.2<br />
54.8<br />
Percentage of women who were visited within 2 weeks of delivery<br />
5.4<br />
5.5<br />
5.3<br />
Percentage of women who were visited at least once within 6 weeks of delivery<br />
28.5<br />
22.7<br />
46.6<br />
Number of women<br />
2,595<br />
1,965<br />
631<br />
* Women who had live birth/still birth after 1.1.1999/2001<br />
Note: Total includes 30, 10, 84 cases with missing information in advised to have delivery at health facility, visited within 2<br />
weeks of delivery and visited at least once within 6 weeks of delivery respectively.<br />
Table 7.14 gives percentage of currently married women who have given live/still birth<br />
three years preceding the survey, quality of care indicators related to delivery care by district.<br />
The percentage of women who were advised to have delivery at the health facility by doctor/<br />
health worker was the highest (84 percent) in Srinagar district, followed by 82 percent in<br />
Kargil and Kupwara districts and the lowest (12 percent) in Badgam district. The percentage<br />
of women who were advised to have delivery at the health facility by doctor/health worker<br />
was the higher than that of the state (53 percent) in Anantnag, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh,<br />
Pulwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining seven districts it was lower than that<br />
of the state. Further, percentage of women who were visited within two weeks of delivery by<br />
the ANM was the highest (32 percent) in Doda district, followed by 27 percent in Udhampur<br />
district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district. The percentage of women who were<br />
visited within two weeks of delivery by the ANM was higher than that of the state (over five<br />
percent) in Doda, Jammu, Kargil, Rajouri, Srinagar and Uddhampur districts, while in the<br />
remaining eight districts it was lower than that of the state. Again, percentage of women who were<br />
visited at-least once within six weeks of delivery by the ANM was the highest (88 percent) in<br />
Jammu district, followed by 63 percent in Doda district and the lowest (one percent) in<br />
Baramula district. The percentage of women who were visited at-least once within two weeks<br />
of delivery by the ANM was lower than that of the state (28 percent) in 12 districtds of<br />
Anantnag, Badgm, Baramula, Kargil, Kathua, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama, Poonch, Rajouri,<br />
Srinagar and Udhampur, while in the remaining two districts of Doda and Jammu of the state<br />
it was higher than that of the state.<br />
131
Table 7.14 QUALITY OF CARE INDICATORS FOR MATERNAL CARE<br />
Among currently married women* who are given live/still birth three years preceding the survey, quality of care indicators<br />
related to delivery care by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percentage of women<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Advised to have delivery at health<br />
facility by doctor/ health worker<br />
Visited within 2 weeks of<br />
delivery by ANM<br />
Visited at least one within 6<br />
weeks of delivery by ANM<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
68.2<br />
12.2<br />
43.2<br />
33.3<br />
65.0<br />
0.6<br />
0.9<br />
1.2<br />
32.5<br />
6.5<br />
2.9<br />
1.7<br />
1.2<br />
62.7<br />
88.1<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
82.5<br />
23.4<br />
82.5<br />
76.0<br />
80.4<br />
15.5<br />
1.8<br />
4.0<br />
4.4<br />
3.4<br />
27.4<br />
12.2<br />
4.7<br />
4.4<br />
4.3<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
33.6<br />
48.2<br />
84.2<br />
50.0<br />
0.0<br />
8.2<br />
9.0<br />
26.8<br />
6.7<br />
19.3<br />
7.7<br />
25.9<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
52.8<br />
5.4<br />
28.5<br />
* Women who had live birth/still birth after 1.1.1999/2001<br />
132
CHAPTER – VIII<br />
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROBLEMS<br />
AND AWARENESS OF RTIs/STIs AND HIV/AIDS<br />
One of the important components of the Reproductive and Child <strong>Health</strong> Programme is to have<br />
a healthy sexual life without any fear of contracting disease. With this approach the RCH<br />
programme places a lot of emphasis on promoting and encouraging healthy sexual behaviour<br />
among couples through various Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities.<br />
<strong>Health</strong> workers are also expected to educate women and men about Reproductive Tract<br />
Infections (RTIs) and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and motivate those people with<br />
RTI/STI problems to seek medical help. The DLHS-RCH has made an attempt to collect<br />
information on awareness and prevalence of RTI/STI. Apart from this, information on<br />
knowledge of HIV/AIDS, source of information and way of avoiding AIDS were also<br />
collected.<br />
8.1 Awareness of RTI/STI<br />
An attempt was made to asses whether couples were aware of RTI/STI. Currently married<br />
women and their husbands were asked about their awareness of RTI/STI, and if they were<br />
aware, they were further questioned about the source of information and mode of transmission<br />
of the disease. Table 8.1 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who<br />
have heard about RTI/STI and percentage who received information from specific sources by<br />
selected background characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of women who<br />
have heard about RTI/STI was 15 percent in the state – over 14 percent in rural areas and 18 percent<br />
in urban areas. Awareness of RTI/STI was the lowest (seven percent) for women aged 15-19<br />
years, which increases with age and was the highest (19 percent) for women aged 30-34 years<br />
and declines to 16 percent in the age group 35-39 years and to 11 percent in the age group 40-44<br />
years. Awareness of RTI/STI was over six percent for Hindu women as against 20 percent for<br />
Muslim women, 13 percent for Sikh women and 46 percent for Buddhist women, while it was<br />
23 percent for other women. Similarly, awareness of RTI/STI was eight percent for scheduled<br />
caste women as against six percent for scheduled tribe women and 24 percent for OBC<br />
women, while it was 16 percent for other caste women. Awareness of RTI/STI was the highest<br />
(21 percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (12 percent)<br />
for women who had studied for 0-9 years, while it was 14 percent for non-literate women.<br />
Awareness of RTI/STI was the highest (21 percent) for women with medium SLI and the<br />
lowest (two percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 15 percent for women with high<br />
SLI. Figure 8.1 shows awareness of RTI/STI by sex according to residence.<br />
Those women who had heard of RTI/STI reported source of its information as ‘radio’<br />
(89 percent),’television’ (87 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (21 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />
hoardings’ (seven percent),’doctor’ (eight percent),’health worker’ (seven<br />
percent),’school teacher’ (four percent),’community meeting’ (six percent) and ‘relatives/friends’<br />
(73 percent).<br />
Table 8.2 gives percentage of husbands of eligible women who have heard of RTI/STI, percentage<br />
who received information from specific sources by selected background characteristics in the
Table 8.1 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15 - 44 who have heard about RTI/STI and among women who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources<br />
by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />
Background<br />
Characteristic<br />
Age group (years)<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9 years@<br />
10 and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Percentage<br />
who have<br />
heard about<br />
RTI/STI<br />
7.4<br />
10.1<br />
15.0<br />
18.7<br />
16.4<br />
11.3<br />
14.5<br />
18.2<br />
14.2<br />
12.5<br />
20.8<br />
6.4<br />
19.9<br />
13.0<br />
46.1<br />
(22.6)<br />
7.6<br />
5.9<br />
24.0<br />
16.5<br />
1.6<br />
21.3<br />
14.7<br />
Number of<br />
Women<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
Radio<br />
*<br />
93.1<br />
88.5<br />
87.7<br />
93.0<br />
84.9<br />
90.0<br />
87.7<br />
95.6<br />
94.9<br />
75.1<br />
67.8<br />
95.2<br />
(84.8)<br />
45.7<br />
*<br />
80.2<br />
50.2<br />
96.7<br />
90.0<br />
68.9<br />
93.4<br />
80.3<br />
Television<br />
*<br />
90.4<br />
85.5<br />
83.9<br />
91.7<br />
86.5<br />
86.2<br />
89.6<br />
94.0<br />
93.0<br />
71.6<br />
70.1<br />
91.4<br />
(75.8)<br />
66.4<br />
*<br />
83.4<br />
70.6<br />
94.3<br />
86.7<br />
76.4<br />
92.1<br />
74.9<br />
Among those who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from.<br />
Newspaper/<br />
Books/<br />
Magazines<br />
*<br />
12.0<br />
29.6<br />
20.6<br />
18.2<br />
16.9<br />
19.4<br />
25.5<br />
8.6<br />
14.2<br />
47.8<br />
66.6<br />
10.7<br />
(51.5)<br />
51.5<br />
*<br />
81.1<br />
48.6<br />
5.3<br />
20.3<br />
58.2<br />
12.2<br />
41.8<br />
Slogan/<br />
Pamphlets/<br />
Posters/<br />
Wall Hoardings Doctor<br />
*<br />
0.9<br />
9.5<br />
6.8<br />
8.0<br />
3.5<br />
4.2<br />
14.3<br />
1.5<br />
1.8<br />
20.0<br />
22.3<br />
3.0<br />
(9.1)<br />
32.3<br />
*<br />
14.1<br />
27.0<br />
0.3<br />
7.9<br />
17.9<br />
1.8<br />
20.1<br />
*<br />
4.8<br />
11.4<br />
6.6<br />
8.0<br />
9.6<br />
5.5<br />
15.8<br />
0.7<br />
5.0<br />
24.3<br />
29.4<br />
4.2<br />
(15.2)<br />
14.8<br />
*<br />
9.2<br />
12.9<br />
1.0<br />
11.3<br />
3.5<br />
3.7<br />
21.2<br />
<strong>Health</strong><br />
worker<br />
*<br />
2.4<br />
9.1<br />
7.7<br />
7.0<br />
5.9<br />
6.7<br />
8.9<br />
0.8<br />
5.4<br />
20.5<br />
9.0<br />
6.7<br />
(15.2)<br />
9.9<br />
*<br />
3.8<br />
9.2<br />
1.0<br />
10.5<br />
6.1<br />
4.0<br />
16.3<br />
School<br />
teacher<br />
*<br />
1.8<br />
6.5<br />
3.1<br />
3.0<br />
1.1<br />
3.0<br />
4.9<br />
0.2<br />
1.9<br />
10.5<br />
4.1<br />
3.3<br />
(12.1)<br />
4.4<br />
*<br />
10.9<br />
4.9<br />
0.0<br />
4.3<br />
0.4<br />
1.8<br />
8.5<br />
Community<br />
Meeting<br />
*<br />
4.9<br />
6.6<br />
7.9<br />
6.4<br />
2.0<br />
7.2<br />
4.2<br />
3.5<br />
4.5<br />
12.4<br />
2.1<br />
6.7<br />
(30.3)<br />
1.3<br />
*<br />
1.2<br />
3.9<br />
3.7<br />
7.9<br />
6.8<br />
5.3<br />
9.0<br />
Relative/<br />
Friends<br />
*<br />
83.8<br />
63.4<br />
69.1<br />
80.4<br />
79.8<br />
71.6<br />
76.3<br />
85.3<br />
80.1<br />
46.5<br />
26.3<br />
84.1<br />
(78.8)<br />
6.5<br />
*<br />
18.3<br />
6.4<br />
91.8<br />
76.2<br />
3.1<br />
82.0<br />
54.5<br />
Others<br />
*<br />
0.0<br />
3.5<br />
2.6<br />
3.7<br />
1.8<br />
3.3<br />
2.0<br />
0.8<br />
1.4<br />
7.5<br />
5.3<br />
2.4<br />
(9.1)<br />
2.4<br />
*<br />
3.5<br />
4.1<br />
1.1<br />
3.6<br />
7.9<br />
1.4<br />
6.6<br />
Number of<br />
women who<br />
have heard<br />
about<br />
RTI/STI<br />
5<br />
85<br />
367<br />
498<br />
449<br />
179<br />
1,135<br />
447<br />
880<br />
229<br />
473<br />
232<br />
1,255<br />
34<br />
54<br />
7<br />
88<br />
80<br />
424<br />
967<br />
35<br />
1,124<br />
423<br />
Total<br />
15.3<br />
10,308<br />
89.4<br />
87.1<br />
21.1<br />
7.1<br />
8.4<br />
7.3<br />
3.6<br />
6.3<br />
72.9<br />
2.9<br />
1,582<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />
134
Table 8.2 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />
Percentage of husbands of eligible women who have heard about RTI/STI and among men who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources by<br />
selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />
Background characteristic<br />
Age group (years)<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Percentage<br />
who have<br />
heard about<br />
RTI/STI<br />
25.9<br />
26.4<br />
28.9<br />
22.9<br />
27.2<br />
27.3<br />
12.9<br />
21.8<br />
43.3<br />
10.4<br />
35.8<br />
23.8<br />
51.5<br />
(26.7)<br />
8.2<br />
17.8<br />
37.2<br />
29.6<br />
10.6<br />
32.7<br />
29.6<br />
Number of<br />
men<br />
181<br />
3,549<br />
5,257<br />
1,251<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
3,797<br />
2,252<br />
4,174<br />
3,394<br />
6,367<br />
301<br />
146<br />
30<br />
1,075<br />
1,391<br />
1,736<br />
5,830<br />
2,119<br />
5,272<br />
2,847<br />
Radio<br />
79.6<br />
83.6<br />
81.0<br />
78.4<br />
81.8<br />
81.1<br />
96.9<br />
87.4<br />
75.9<br />
50.3<br />
87.2<br />
83.9<br />
56.8<br />
*<br />
56.9<br />
62.5<br />
86.9<br />
84.5<br />
60.7<br />
88.7<br />
72.6<br />
Among those who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from.<br />
Television<br />
82.0<br />
83.1<br />
83.8<br />
85.7<br />
83.5<br />
84.7<br />
92.5<br />
90.3<br />
79.6<br />
55.7<br />
88.4<br />
83.9<br />
75.3<br />
*<br />
61.7<br />
78.9<br />
86.8<br />
85.0<br />
64.9<br />
89.1<br />
78.0<br />
Newspaper/<br />
Books/<br />
Magazines<br />
35.1<br />
39.0<br />
32.3<br />
31.9<br />
31.3<br />
45.0<br />
4.1<br />
18.2<br />
47.2<br />
49.5<br />
30.3<br />
74.5<br />
57.8<br />
*<br />
45.3<br />
36.8<br />
25.6<br />
38.1<br />
31.5<br />
27.8<br />
49.3<br />
Slogan/<br />
Pamphlets<br />
/ Posters/<br />
Wall<br />
Hoardings Doctor<br />
13.6<br />
10.6<br />
10.1<br />
14.8<br />
8.5<br />
18.1<br />
2.1<br />
3.9<br />
15.0<br />
24.7<br />
7.9<br />
16.5<br />
28.8<br />
*<br />
27.4<br />
20.4<br />
4.4<br />
11.2<br />
17.8<br />
7.3<br />
16.2<br />
23.9<br />
24.2<br />
20.7<br />
28.2<br />
22.9<br />
22.3<br />
4.4<br />
22.8<br />
27.7<br />
42.7<br />
19.4<br />
42.4<br />
12.8<br />
*<br />
51.3<br />
17.3<br />
8.4<br />
28.2<br />
38.6<br />
18.5<br />
27.1<br />
<strong>Health</strong><br />
worker<br />
10.9<br />
8.9<br />
8.2<br />
8.7<br />
7.6<br />
11.7<br />
2.1<br />
4.8<br />
11.2<br />
15.4<br />
7.5<br />
13.0<br />
4.1<br />
*<br />
17.4<br />
10.9<br />
5.1<br />
9.5<br />
20.2<br />
5.5<br />
11.6<br />
School<br />
teacher<br />
5.2<br />
7.6<br />
6.0<br />
7.6<br />
6.9<br />
5.9<br />
1.1<br />
2.7<br />
9.1<br />
7.3<br />
6.3<br />
20.5<br />
1.8<br />
*<br />
15.9<br />
11.0<br />
3.0<br />
7.3<br />
14.8<br />
4.8<br />
8.2<br />
Community<br />
Meeting<br />
9.3<br />
9.7<br />
10.0<br />
7.9<br />
9.0<br />
11.9<br />
2.8<br />
7.0<br />
12.2<br />
7.1<br />
10.0<br />
18.8<br />
3.8<br />
*<br />
8.8<br />
10.5<br />
9.9<br />
9.7<br />
10.9<br />
10.2<br />
8.4<br />
Relative/<br />
Friends<br />
55.3<br />
56.2<br />
55.5<br />
45.5<br />
52.2<br />
62.8<br />
88.5<br />
65.8<br />
42.6<br />
34.7<br />
59.4<br />
56.1<br />
3.2<br />
*<br />
34.6<br />
9.5<br />
68.5<br />
59.2<br />
21.2<br />
65.6<br />
41.5<br />
Others<br />
4.6<br />
3.5<br />
3.2<br />
2.8<br />
2.9<br />
4.5<br />
1.4<br />
1.1<br />
4.4<br />
5.7<br />
3.0<br />
2.1<br />
0.7<br />
*<br />
6.9<br />
8.2<br />
1.1<br />
3.4<br />
8.8<br />
2.4<br />
3.7<br />
Number of<br />
men who<br />
have heard<br />
about<br />
RTI/STI<br />
47<br />
938<br />
1,518<br />
287<br />
2,125<br />
665<br />
488<br />
491<br />
1,809<br />
354<br />
2,280<br />
72<br />
75<br />
8<br />
88<br />
247<br />
646<br />
1,724<br />
225<br />
1,722<br />
843<br />
Total<br />
27.2 10,239 81.6 83.8 34.6 10.8 22.7 8.6 6.7 9.7 54.7<br />
Note: Table includes 2 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
#Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />
3.3<br />
2,790<br />
135
Figure 8.1<br />
Awarness of RTI/STI by Sex According to Residence<br />
Total<br />
Women<br />
15<br />
Men<br />
27<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Women<br />
15<br />
Men<br />
27<br />
Urban<br />
Women<br />
18<br />
Men<br />
27<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percent<br />
Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of men who have heard about RTI/STI was 27 percent<br />
in the state irrespective of place of residence. The awareness of RTI/STI was the highest (29 percent)<br />
for men aged 35-44 years and the lowest (23 percent) for men aged 45 years and above. The<br />
awareness of RTI/STI was 10 percent for Hindus as against 36 percent for Muslims, 24 percent for<br />
Sikhs and 51 percent for Buddhist, while it was 27 percent for others. The awareness of RTI/STI<br />
was eight percent for scheduled caste men as against 18 percent for scheduled tribe men, 37 percent<br />
for OBC men, while it was 30 percent for other caste men. The awareness of RTI/STI was the highest<br />
(43 percent) for men who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (13 percent) for nonliterate<br />
men, while it was 22 percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years. The awareness of<br />
RTI/STI was the highest (33 percent) for men with medium SLI and the lowest (11 percent) for<br />
men with low SLI, while it was 30 percent for men with high SLI.<br />
Those men who had heard of RTI/STI reported source of its information as ‘radio’ (82<br />
percent),’television’ (84 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (35 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/ posters/<br />
wall hoardings’ (11 percent),’doctor’ (23 percent),’health worker’ (nine percent),’school teacher’<br />
(seven percent),’community meeting’ (10 percent) and ‘relatives/friends’ (55 percent).<br />
8.1.1 Knowledge of Mode of Transmission of RTI/STI<br />
Women who were aware of RTI/STI were asked about the mode of its transmission. Table 8.3<br />
gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard of RTI/STI,<br />
knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state. Only eight<br />
percent of the women said’ do not know’ about transmission of RTI/STI in the state – 11 percent in<br />
rural areas and less than one percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not<br />
know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 44 percent for Hindu women as against<br />
over one percent for Muslim women and nine percent for Sikh women, while it was 12 percent for<br />
other caste women. The extent of women who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission<br />
136
Table 8.3 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Homosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />
Heterosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
Lack of personnel<br />
hygiene<br />
Other<br />
Do not know<br />
Number of<br />
women who<br />
have heard<br />
of RTI/STI<br />
Age<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
9.7<br />
24.4<br />
16.2<br />
15.7<br />
14.9<br />
88.4<br />
83.5<br />
85.6<br />
92.9<br />
91.9<br />
36.7<br />
40.8<br />
45.7<br />
46.0<br />
58.3<br />
3.1<br />
4.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.9<br />
9.6<br />
12.3<br />
10.2<br />
4.3<br />
2.2<br />
85<br />
367<br />
498<br />
449<br />
179<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
15.0<br />
23.5<br />
86.9<br />
90.6<br />
41.5<br />
55.4<br />
2.2<br />
2.9<br />
11.2<br />
0.5<br />
1,135<br />
447<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
4.4<br />
9.3<br />
45.5<br />
91.4<br />
92.6<br />
79.3<br />
35.9<br />
68.8<br />
52.0<br />
0.9<br />
0.3<br />
6.1<br />
7.7<br />
7.2<br />
9.4<br />
880<br />
229<br />
473<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Other<br />
30.8<br />
13.8<br />
(45.5)<br />
33.5<br />
39.3<br />
97.2<br />
(90.9)<br />
78.9<br />
28.2<br />
47.6<br />
(75.8)<br />
52.1<br />
1.1<br />
1.9<br />
(18.2)<br />
11.3<br />
43.9<br />
1.4<br />
(9.1)<br />
11.6<br />
232<br />
1,255<br />
34<br />
54<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
19.8<br />
31.4<br />
3.7<br />
21.6<br />
20.5<br />
8.9<br />
39.8<br />
27.9<br />
80.1<br />
96.8<br />
89.9<br />
44.8<br />
91.6<br />
81.8<br />
18.9<br />
49.1<br />
39.0<br />
51.1<br />
32.0<br />
42.4<br />
54.6<br />
3.7<br />
10.4<br />
0.9<br />
2.3<br />
10.7<br />
1.7<br />
3.3<br />
66.6<br />
11.1<br />
1.9<br />
5.5<br />
51.7<br />
7.1<br />
7.3<br />
88<br />
80<br />
424<br />
967<br />
35<br />
1,124<br />
423<br />
Total<br />
17.4<br />
87.9<br />
45.5<br />
2.4<br />
8.2<br />
Note: Total includes 5 women in the 15-19 age group, 7 in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
#Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
1,582<br />
of RTI/STI was 67 percent for scheduled caste women as against 11 percent for scheduled tribe<br />
women and two percent for OBC women, while it was over five percent for other caste women.<br />
Fifty-two percent of women with low SLI as against seven percent of women with medium/high<br />
SLI said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI. The percentage of women who<br />
said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was nine percent for women who had<br />
studied for 10 years and above as against eight percent for non-literate women and seven percent for<br />
women who had studied for 0-9 years. Further, percentage of women who were aware of RTI/STI and<br />
had knowledge about its mode of transmission reported these as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (17 percent),<br />
‘heterosexual intercourse’ (88 percent) and ’lack of personnel hygiene’ (45 percent).<br />
Men who were aware of RTI/STI were asked about the mode of its transmission. Table 8.4<br />
gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of<br />
mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state. Only six percent of the<br />
men said’ do not know’ about transmission of RTI/STI in the state – five percent in rural areas and<br />
seven percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of<br />
137
Table 8.4 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />
Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of RTI/STI, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Age<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45+<br />
Homosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
47.9<br />
35.6<br />
29.8<br />
36.1<br />
Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />
Heterosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
83.0<br />
86.6<br />
85.8<br />
83.1<br />
Lack of personnel<br />
hygiene<br />
47.6<br />
48.4<br />
44.5<br />
43.9<br />
Other<br />
5.5<br />
8.1<br />
5.4<br />
6.0<br />
Do not know<br />
13.1<br />
5.7<br />
5.7<br />
5.7<br />
Number of<br />
men who<br />
have heard<br />
of RTI/STI<br />
47<br />
938<br />
1,518<br />
287<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
32.4<br />
33.8<br />
86.8<br />
82.3<br />
43.0<br />
54.9<br />
5.0<br />
10.7<br />
5.4<br />
7.0<br />
2,125<br />
665<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
8.2<br />
13.8<br />
44.4<br />
92.5<br />
92.8<br />
82.0<br />
39.0<br />
49.5<br />
46.6<br />
1.8<br />
3.0<br />
8.5<br />
6.8<br />
2.8<br />
6.3<br />
488<br />
491<br />
1,809<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
40.8<br />
30.3<br />
57.1<br />
47.0<br />
53.8<br />
90.7<br />
84.4<br />
86.5<br />
39.9<br />
47.3<br />
49.7<br />
27.7<br />
6.7<br />
6.5<br />
5.9<br />
2.1<br />
16.2<br />
4.0<br />
9.5<br />
9.2<br />
354<br />
2,280<br />
72<br />
75<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
37.6<br />
42.0<br />
18.8<br />
36.4<br />
67.7<br />
76.0<br />
89.4<br />
86.5<br />
43.2<br />
30.8<br />
36.9<br />
53.3<br />
17.3<br />
9.0<br />
1.5<br />
7.3<br />
10.1<br />
13.2<br />
2.8<br />
5.4<br />
88<br />
247<br />
646<br />
1,724<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
50.1<br />
25.3<br />
43.3<br />
72.0<br />
92.5<br />
75.6<br />
48.9<br />
47.0<br />
42.5<br />
19.8<br />
4.3<br />
7.0<br />
15.1<br />
3.2<br />
8.7<br />
225<br />
1,722<br />
843<br />
Total<br />
32.7<br />
85.7<br />
45.8<br />
6.4<br />
5.8<br />
2,790<br />
Note1: Total includes 2 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
Note2: Total includes 8 men with other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate men with no years of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
transmission of RTI/STI was 16 percent for Hindu men as against four percent for Muslim men<br />
and nine percent for Sikh and also Buddhist men. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />
about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 10 percent for scheduled caste men as against 13<br />
percent for scheduled tribe men and three percent for OBC men, while it was over five percent for<br />
other caste men. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission<br />
of RTI/STI was six percent for men who had studied for 10 years and above as against three<br />
percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years and seven percent for non-literate men. The percentage<br />
of men who said ‘do not know’ about the mode of transmission of RTI/STI was 15 percent for<br />
men with low SLI as against nine percent for men with high SLI and three percent for men with<br />
medium SLI. Further, percentage of men who were aware of RTI/STI and had knowledge about its<br />
mode of transmission reported these as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (33 percent), ‘heterosexual intercourse’<br />
(86 percent) and ’lack of personnel hygiene’ (46 percent).<br />
8.2 Prevalence of RTI/STI<br />
In DLHS-RCH, information was collected on the common symptoms of reproductive tract infections<br />
138
and sexually transmitted infections from women and their husbands, and information on menstruation<br />
related problems in the three months preceding the survey. The prevalence of reproductive tract<br />
infections and sexually transmitted tract infections is judged by their symptoms. All the respondents<br />
were told about symptoms of RTI/STI, and were asked whether they had any of them. In case of<br />
the presence of at least one symptom, they were further asked whether they sought treatment for<br />
such problems, and if they had sought treatment, details regarding the source of treatment were<br />
also recorded. The topic of RTI/STI is quite sensitive. The culture of silence prevents people from<br />
discussing such topics in front of others. In spite of intensive training of the investigators, the<br />
respondent might have hesitated in reporting the symptoms of RTI/STI. What gets reported in the<br />
survey though may not have given the exact prevalence, but may have given the lower limit for it?<br />
Table 8.5 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who reported<br />
any symptoms of RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three months prior to survey by residence<br />
in the state. The percentage of women who reported any symptom of RTI/STI was 16 percent in<br />
the state – 15 percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas. The symptoms reported were<br />
‘itching over vulva’ (one percent),’boils/ulcer/warts around vulva’ (one percent),’pain in lower<br />
abdomen not related to menses’ (four percent),’low backache’ (over six percent),’pain during<br />
sexual intercourse’ (over one percent),’bleeding after sexual intercourse’ (one percent),’swelling<br />
in the groin’ (over one percent),’frequent/painful passage of urine’ (two percent),’fever’ (seven<br />
percent),’some mass coming out of vagina’ (two percent),’any involuntary escape of urine while<br />
coughing or sneezing’ (over one percent) and ’swelling/lump in breast’ (one percent). Figure 8.2<br />
shows symptoms of RTI/STI among women.<br />
Table 8.5 SYMPTOMS OF RTI/STI AMONG WOMEN<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who reported any symptoms RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three<br />
months prior to survey, according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Symptoms<br />
Percentage of women reported any RTI/STI symptoms<br />
Total<br />
16.0<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
14.9<br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
19.6<br />
Symptoms<br />
Itching over vulva<br />
Boils/ ulcers/ warts around vulva<br />
Pain in lower abdomen not related to menses<br />
Low backache<br />
Pain during sexual intercourse<br />
Bleeding after sexual intercourse<br />
Swelling in the groin<br />
Frequent / painful passage of urine<br />
Fever<br />
Some mass coming out of vagina<br />
Any involuntary escape of urine while coughing or sneezing<br />
Swelling / lump in breast<br />
1.1<br />
0.6<br />
3.7<br />
6.5<br />
1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
1.8<br />
6.6<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.0<br />
0.7<br />
0.5<br />
3.6<br />
5.5<br />
1.2<br />
0.8<br />
1.2<br />
1.7<br />
6.5<br />
1.5<br />
1.4<br />
0.9<br />
2.5<br />
1.1<br />
4.3<br />
9.8<br />
2.7<br />
2.4<br />
2.2<br />
2.1<br />
7.0<br />
1.7<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
Number of women<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
Table 8.6 and Figure 8.3 show the prevalence of reproductive health problems among husbands<br />
of currently married women. The prevalence of RTI/STI among men was judged by the reporting of<br />
symptoms. The percentage of men who reported any RTI/STI symptoms was six percent in the state<br />
– seven percent in rural areas and over three percent in urban areas. The symptoms reported were<br />
‘any discharge from penis’ (three percent),’any sore/rash/redness on genital or anal areas’ (over one<br />
percent),’difficulty/pain while urinating or very frequent urination’ (one percent),’swelling of testis<br />
or in groin area’ (over one percent) and ‘itching/irritation around genital’ (over two percent).<br />
139
Figure 8.2<br />
Symptomps of RTI/STI among Women<br />
Any RTI/STI symptoms<br />
16<br />
Low backache<br />
Pain in lower abdomen not related to menses<br />
Any involuntary escape of urine while coughing or<br />
sneezing<br />
Frequent / painful passage of urine<br />
Itching over vulva<br />
Pain during sexual intercourse<br />
Fever<br />
Boils/ ulcers/ warts around vulva<br />
Some mass coming out of vagina<br />
Swelling / lump in breast<br />
Swelling in the groin<br />
Bleeding after sexual intercourse<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
4<br />
7<br />
7<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />
Percent<br />
Figure 8.3<br />
Symptomps of RTI/STI among Husbands<br />
Any RTI/STI symptoms<br />
6<br />
Itching / irritation around genital<br />
2<br />
Swelling of testis or in groin area<br />
Difficulty / pain while urinating or very frequent<br />
urination<br />
Any sore / rash / redness on genitals or anal area<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
Any discharge from penis<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
3<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
Percent<br />
Further, percentage of men who sought treatment for any RTI/STI problem was 54 percent<br />
in the state – 56 percent in rural areas and 43 percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who<br />
sought treatment for any RTI/STI problem from government health facility was 81 percent, from<br />
private health facility nine percent and from ISM facility 12 percent, while eight percent men<br />
sought treatment from a chemist/medical shop. In other words, around 10 percent of the men<br />
sought treatment from more than one health facility. Further, 83 percent men obtained treatment<br />
from doctor, 12 percent from a male health worker, four percent from an ISM practitioner, eight<br />
140
Table 8.6 SYMPTOMS OF RTI/STI AMONG MEN<br />
Percentage of husbands of currently married women who reported any symptoms RTI/STI and specific symptoms during three<br />
months prior to survey and sought treatment for RTI/STI by source of treatment, according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Symptoms and treatment<br />
Total<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Percentage of men reported any RTI/STI symptoms<br />
6.2<br />
7.1<br />
3.5<br />
Symptoms<br />
Any discharge from penis<br />
Any sore / rash / redness on genitals or anal area<br />
Difficulty / pain while urinating or very frequent urination<br />
Swelling of testis or in groin area<br />
Itching / irritation around genital<br />
2.6<br />
1.2<br />
1.3<br />
1.3<br />
2.4<br />
2.8<br />
1.4<br />
1.5<br />
1.5<br />
2.9<br />
1.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.7<br />
0.8<br />
Number of men<br />
10,239<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
Percentage of men sought treatment for any RTI/STI 1<br />
54.0<br />
55.6<br />
43.4<br />
Number of men<br />
639<br />
553<br />
86<br />
Percentage sought treatment at health facility 2<br />
Government health facility 3<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
81.0<br />
6.1<br />
2.9<br />
81.4<br />
6.7<br />
3.2<br />
(80.6)<br />
(2.8)<br />
(2.8)<br />
Private health facility 4<br />
9.4<br />
9.5<br />
(13.9)<br />
ISM 5 facility<br />
11.6<br />
9.7<br />
(22.2)<br />
Chemist/ medical shop<br />
7.6<br />
8.0<br />
(5.6)<br />
Other<br />
0.8<br />
0.8<br />
(2.8)<br />
Percentage obtained treatment from 2<br />
Doctor<br />
Male health worker<br />
Traditional healer<br />
Relative/friends<br />
ISM practitioner<br />
Home remedy<br />
Chemist medical shop<br />
Other<br />
82.8<br />
12.1<br />
1.9<br />
1.1<br />
3.7<br />
3.0<br />
8.4<br />
1.1<br />
80.8<br />
13.3<br />
1.4<br />
1.1<br />
3.9<br />
2.8<br />
9.0<br />
1.1<br />
(94.4)<br />
(5.6)<br />
(8.3)<br />
(2.8)<br />
(8.3)<br />
(5.6)<br />
(5.6)<br />
(2.8)<br />
Number of men<br />
349<br />
317<br />
37<br />
1<br />
Based on men with any symptoms of RTI/STI<br />
2<br />
Percentage may add more than 100.0 due to multiple responses and based on who sought treatment.<br />
3<br />
Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre.<br />
4 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic,<br />
5<br />
Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
percent from a chemist/medical shop, two percent from a traditional healer, one percent from<br />
relatives/friends, while three percent men tried home remedy.<br />
The DLHS-RCH also collected information from currently married women on symptoms<br />
of RTIs, that is, on abnormal vaginal discharge, texture, colour and odour of discharge in the three<br />
months immediately preceding the survey. The prevalence of reproductive health problems among<br />
currently married women is estimated from women’s experiences. Table 8.7 gives percentage of<br />
currently married women aged 15-44 years who reported any vaginal discharge during three months<br />
prior to survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment by residence in the<br />
141
Table 8.7 ABNORMAL VAGINAL DISCHARGE<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who reported had any abnormal vaginal discharge during three months prior<br />
to survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Symptoms and treatment<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Percentage of women reported abnormal vaginal discharge<br />
0.9<br />
0.7<br />
1.7<br />
Number of women<br />
10,308<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
Percentage of women sought treatment for vaginal discharge 1<br />
62.1<br />
46.9<br />
(78.7)<br />
Number of women<br />
94<br />
53<br />
41<br />
Percentage sought treatment at health facility 2<br />
Government health facility 3<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
73.2<br />
11.4<br />
9.5<br />
(69.0)<br />
(31.0)<br />
(3.4)<br />
(62.2)<br />
(8.1)<br />
(8.1)<br />
Private health facility 4<br />
33.3<br />
(34.5)<br />
(37.8)<br />
ISM 5 facility<br />
11.3<br />
(6.9)<br />
(16.2)<br />
Home remedy<br />
4.2<br />
(0.0)<br />
(5.4)<br />
Other<br />
6.4<br />
(0.0)<br />
(8.1)<br />
Percent distribution of women who obtained treatment from 2<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />
Other health professionals 6<br />
Other<br />
77.0<br />
19.0<br />
1.3<br />
2.7<br />
(79.3)<br />
(17.2)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(3.4)<br />
(86.5)<br />
(8.1)<br />
(2.7)<br />
(2.7)<br />
Total percent<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
100.0<br />
Number of women<br />
58<br />
25<br />
33<br />
1<br />
Based on women who reported having vaginal discharge. 2 Based on women who sought treatment for vaginal discharge.<br />
3<br />
Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre<br />
and out reach/ MCP clinic in village. 4 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic, chemist/<br />
medical shop. 5 Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine, 6 Includes dai (trained or untrained),<br />
relative or friends and chemist/ medical shop. () Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
Note: Total includes 49 women with missing information on abnormal vaginal discharge who were not shown separately.<br />
state. The percent of women who reported abnormal vaginal discharge was one percent in the<br />
state – about one percent in rural areas and about two percent in urban area.<br />
Sixty-two percent of the women who reported any symptom of vaginal discharge sought<br />
treatment in the state – 47 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />
women who sought treatment from government health facility was 73 percent, from private health<br />
facility 33 percent, from ISM facility 11 percent and from other health facility six percent, while<br />
four percent women tried home remedy. In other words, one-fourth of the women sought treatment<br />
from more than source. Further, more of women in rural areas sought treatment from private<br />
health facility, while more of women in urban areas sought treatment from ISM health facility.<br />
Again, 77 percent of the women sought treatment from the doctor, 19 percent from ANM/Nurse/<br />
Midwife /LHV and four percent by other health professionals. More of women in urban areas sought<br />
treatment from the doctor, while more of women in rural areas sought treatment from ANM/Nurse/<br />
Midwife /LHV.<br />
142
8.3 Menstruation Related Problems<br />
Table 8.8 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who had any menstruation<br />
related problem during three months prior to survey and percentage who sought treatment and<br />
source of treatment according to place of residence in the state. The percentage of women with<br />
any menstruation related problem was four percent in the state irrespective of place of residence.<br />
Table 8.8 MENSTRUATION RELATED PROBLEMS<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 who had any menstruation related problem during three months prior to<br />
survey and percentage who sought treatment and source of treatment according to residence, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Symptoms and treatment<br />
Total<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Residence<br />
Urban<br />
Percentage of women with any menstruation related problem<br />
3.8<br />
3.7<br />
3.9<br />
Number of Women<br />
7,978<br />
5,492<br />
2,037<br />
Symptoms 1<br />
No period<br />
Painful period<br />
Frequent or short period<br />
Delayed period<br />
Prolonged bleeding<br />
Excessive bleeding<br />
Continuous bleeding<br />
Scanty bleeding<br />
Inter-menstrual bleeding<br />
30.4<br />
38.3<br />
16.8<br />
17.1<br />
5.2<br />
17.4<br />
7.7<br />
4.4<br />
1.0<br />
36.6<br />
27.5<br />
8.7<br />
18.9<br />
6.3<br />
12.5<br />
2.4<br />
4.9<br />
1.4<br />
13.0<br />
68.3<br />
39.6<br />
12.1<br />
2.1<br />
31.1<br />
22.7<br />
3.1<br />
0.1<br />
Percentage of women sought treatment who had any<br />
menstruation related problems<br />
84.7<br />
86.7<br />
79.1<br />
Number of Women<br />
300<br />
221<br />
79<br />
Percentage sought treatment at health facility 6<br />
Government health facility 2<br />
Primary health centre<br />
Sub centre<br />
78.3<br />
3.5<br />
1.9<br />
77.6<br />
4.7<br />
2.5<br />
80.5<br />
0.0<br />
0.0<br />
Private health facility 3<br />
21.6<br />
24.2<br />
13.8<br />
ISM 4 facility<br />
4.8<br />
3.8<br />
8.0<br />
Other<br />
1.2<br />
1.5<br />
0.0<br />
Percentage of women obtained treatment from 6<br />
Doctor<br />
ANM/nurse/midwife/LHV<br />
Other health professionals 5<br />
Other<br />
87.5<br />
14.3<br />
9.0<br />
1.9<br />
84.4<br />
17.2<br />
11.2<br />
2.5<br />
96.9<br />
5.4<br />
2.3<br />
0.0<br />
Number of women<br />
1<br />
Based on women who reported any menstruated related problems.<br />
2<br />
Includes Government municipal hospital, dispensary, UHC/ UHP /UWFC, CHC/ rural hospital, Primary health centre, subcentre<br />
and out reach/ MCP clinic in village. 3 Includes private hospital/ clinic, non-governmental / trust hospital/clinic, chemist/<br />
medical shop. 4 Either government or private hospital/clinic of Indian system of medicine, 5 Includes dai (trained or untrained),<br />
relative or friends and chemist/ medical shop. 6 Multiple responses.<br />
Note: Total includes 4 woman with missing information on any menstruation problem who were not shown separately<br />
Among the women who had any menstrual problems reported as ’no period’ (30 percent),<br />
’painful period’ (38 percent),’frequent or short period’ (17 percent),’delayed period’ (17 percent),<br />
’prolonged period’ (five percent),’excessive bleeding’ (17 percent),’continuous bleeding’ (eight<br />
254<br />
191<br />
62<br />
143
percent),’scanty bleeding’ (over four percent) and ’inter-menstrual bleeding’ (one percent). The<br />
percentage of women who had any menstrual related problems and sought treatment was 85<br />
percent in the state – 87 percent in rural areas and 79 percent in urban areas. The percentage of<br />
women who sought treatment from government health facility was 78 percent, from private<br />
health facility 22 percent, from ISM facility five percent and from other health facility over one<br />
percent. In other words, six percent of the women sought treatment from more than one health<br />
facility. Further, percentage of the women who sought treatment was 87 percent from the doctor,<br />
14 percent from ANM/Nurse/Midwife/LHV, nine percent from other health professional and two<br />
percent from other.<br />
8.4 Prevalence of RTIs/STIs by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 8.9 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands who reported<br />
reproductive health problems and percentage who sought treatment for the problems by district<br />
in the state. The percentage of women with any symptoms of RTI/STI was the highest (27 percent)<br />
in Kargil and Udhampur districts, followed by 26 percent in Jammu district and the lowest (two<br />
percent) in Baramula and Doda districts, while it was 16 percent for the state. Further, percentage<br />
of women who reported any abnormal vaginal discharge was the highest (eight percent) in Leh<br />
district and the lowest (zero percent) in Badgam, Baramula, Kupwara, Pulwama, Poonch, and<br />
Srinagar districts, while it was one percent for the state. The percentage of women who sought<br />
treatment for abnormal vaginal discharge was the highest (100 percent) in Rajouri district,<br />
followed by 80 percent in Kathua district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district, while it<br />
was 62 percent for the state.<br />
Further, percentage of men with any symptoms of RTI/STI was the highest<br />
(14 percent) in Udhanpur district, followed by 13 percent in Kargil district and the lowest (zero<br />
percent) in Baramula district, while it was six percent for the state. The percentage of men who<br />
Table 8.9 REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE INDICATORS BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of currently married women and their husbands who reported reproductive health problems and percentage who sought<br />
treatment for the problems by district, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
With any<br />
symptoms of<br />
RTI/STI<br />
22.3<br />
15.4<br />
(1.9)<br />
(2.1)<br />
25.7<br />
Percentage of women<br />
Reported any<br />
abnormal vaginal<br />
discharge<br />
(1.3)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.1)<br />
(1.7)<br />
Sought treatment<br />
for abnormal<br />
vaginal discharge<br />
(76.8)<br />
-<br />
-<br />
(0.0)<br />
46.7<br />
Percentage of men<br />
With any<br />
symptoms of<br />
RTI/STI<br />
8.5<br />
12.0<br />
0.0<br />
3.3<br />
5.2<br />
Sought treatment for<br />
RTI/STI problems<br />
65.5<br />
72.1<br />
-<br />
16.8<br />
47.5<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
27.2<br />
4.4<br />
22.2<br />
19.6<br />
21.4<br />
(2.4)<br />
4.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
7.9<br />
(0.0)<br />
(68.1)<br />
(80.3)<br />
-<br />
(18.2)<br />
-<br />
13.2<br />
0.7<br />
8.7<br />
6.9<br />
9.0<br />
93.4<br />
(17.9)<br />
34.3<br />
28.5<br />
34.3<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
20.5<br />
3.7<br />
13.1<br />
27.5<br />
(0.0)<br />
(0.1)<br />
(0.0)<br />
(2.2)<br />
-<br />
(100.0)<br />
-<br />
(69.0)<br />
0.7<br />
2.5<br />
8.2<br />
14.4<br />
(0.0)<br />
(17.8)<br />
70.9<br />
55.2<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
16.0<br />
0.9<br />
62.1<br />
6.2<br />
54.0<br />
( ) Based on less number of cases. - Not Applicable.<br />
144
sought treatment for RTI/STI was the highest (93 percent) in Kargil district, followed by 72<br />
percent in Badgam district and the lowest (zero percent) in Poonch district, while it was 54<br />
percent for the state.<br />
8.5 HIV/AIDS<br />
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is an illness caused by the Human Immune<br />
Virus (HIV), which weakens the immune system and leads to death through secondary infection<br />
such as tuberculosis or pneumonia. The virus is generally transmitted through sexual contact, through<br />
the placenta of HIV-infected women to their children, or through contact with contaminated needle<br />
(injections) or blood. Prevalence of HIV and AIDS has been on the rise for more than a decade in<br />
India and has reached alarming proportions in recent years. To prevent HIV transmission, the<br />
government has been making various efforts.<br />
DLHS-RCH has collected information on the general state of awareness of HIV/AIDS,<br />
its transmission, its prevention and common misconceptions about HIV/AIDS. All the currently<br />
married women in the age group 15-44, and their husbands were first asked if they had ever<br />
heard of an illness called HIV/AIDS. Respondents who had heard of HIV/AIDS were further asked<br />
about their source of information, mode of transmission, and correct knowledge of HIV/AIDS<br />
transfusion.<br />
8.5.1 Knowledge of HIV/AIDS<br />
Table 8.10 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific sources by selected background<br />
characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. Fifty-four percent of the currently married women<br />
have heard of HIV/AIDS in the state, which is higher than RCH Round–I. In Round-I only 35<br />
percent currently married women were aware of HIV/AIDS.<br />
Knowledge of HIV/AIDS among women was 54 percent in the state – 48 percent in rural<br />
areas and 71 percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was<br />
the highest (63 percent) for women aged 20-24 years, followed by 59 percent for women aged 25-29<br />
years and the lowest (41 percent) for women aged 40-44 years. The percentage of women who have<br />
heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (90 percent) for Buddhist women, followed by 76 percent for<br />
Sikh women and the lowest (51 percent) for other caste women, while 53 percent of Hindu/Muslim<br />
women have heard about it. Forty-eight percent of scheduled caste women as against 40 percent of<br />
scheduled tribe women and 57 percent of OBC women have heard about HIV/AIDS, while it was 58<br />
percent for other caste women.<br />
Further, percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (76<br />
percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (45 percent) for nonliterate<br />
women, while it was 56 percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years. Similarly,<br />
percentage of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (65 percent) for women<br />
with high SLI and the lowest (35 percent) for women with low SLI, while it was 56 percent for<br />
women with medium SLI. These data have shown that percentage of women who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS increases with increase in education and standard of living index of the women. This<br />
suggests that exists positive association between percent of women who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />
and education and standard of living index of the women.<br />
145
Table 8.10 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />
Percentage of currently married women aged 15 - 44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS and among women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific<br />
sources by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />
Background characteristic<br />
Percentage<br />
who have<br />
heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Number of<br />
Women<br />
Radio<br />
Among those who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from.<br />
Television<br />
Newspaper/<br />
Books/<br />
Magazines<br />
Slogan/<br />
Pamphlets/<br />
Posters/ Wall<br />
Hoardings<br />
Doctor<br />
<strong>Health</strong><br />
worker<br />
School<br />
teacher<br />
Community<br />
Meeting<br />
Relative/<br />
Friends<br />
Others<br />
Number of<br />
women who<br />
have heard<br />
about<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Age group (years)<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
53.4<br />
63.3<br />
59.3<br />
57.1<br />
50.4<br />
40.7<br />
48.5<br />
70.8<br />
44.9<br />
56.3<br />
76.1<br />
52.6<br />
52.9<br />
75.7<br />
90.4<br />
(51.3)<br />
48.1<br />
39.6<br />
57.3<br />
58.4<br />
34.9<br />
55.7<br />
64.6<br />
63<br />
834<br />
2,444<br />
2,657<br />
2,727<br />
1,583<br />
7,851<br />
2,457<br />
6,202<br />
1,830<br />
2,273<br />
3,599<br />
6,297<br />
264<br />
117<br />
30<br />
1,157<br />
1,365<br />
1,765<br />
5,855<br />
2,156<br />
5,285<br />
2,867<br />
(41.9)<br />
60.5<br />
81.0<br />
78.4<br />
81.7<br />
70.1<br />
80.8<br />
68.8<br />
83.9<br />
68.3<br />
71.2<br />
59.5<br />
87.8<br />
70.9<br />
65.5<br />
*<br />
72.2<br />
51.8<br />
82.5<br />
80.1<br />
63.9<br />
85.7<br />
68.6<br />
(93.5)<br />
91.7<br />
87.5<br />
86.1<br />
84.9<br />
81.0<br />
85.6<br />
87.4<br />
81.8<br />
88.1<br />
91.9<br />
87.0<br />
85.4<br />
91.5<br />
82.7<br />
*<br />
91.8<br />
91.7<br />
80.8<br />
85.8<br />
73.0<br />
88.1<br />
88.3<br />
(19.4)<br />
19.6<br />
29.8<br />
25.9<br />
22.8<br />
27.5<br />
20.1<br />
37.7<br />
10.3<br />
20.1<br />
53.5<br />
38.3<br />
17.0<br />
42.8<br />
40.4<br />
*<br />
25.8<br />
32.7<br />
15.7<br />
27.5<br />
23.7<br />
16.3<br />
41.2<br />
(16.1)<br />
8.0<br />
15.6<br />
17.3<br />
11.6<br />
16.2<br />
10.5<br />
22.8<br />
6.6<br />
7.1<br />
31.3<br />
23.6<br />
9.0<br />
13.4<br />
21.6<br />
*<br />
15.9<br />
22.3<br />
6.2<br />
15.4<br />
14.6<br />
7.8<br />
24.8<br />
(48.4)<br />
31.4<br />
25.8<br />
20.2<br />
24.5<br />
23.5<br />
26.0<br />
20.7<br />
24.9<br />
18.8<br />
26.8<br />
19.1<br />
28.1<br />
19.7<br />
9.1<br />
*<br />
20.9<br />
39.5<br />
21.2<br />
23.5<br />
42.3<br />
20.9<br />
22.5<br />
(9.7)<br />
7.8<br />
12.7<br />
13.4<br />
12.5<br />
9.6<br />
12.2<br />
11.4<br />
10.2<br />
11.3<br />
15.2<br />
10.9<br />
13.0<br />
10.5<br />
3.6<br />
*<br />
12.3<br />
22.6<br />
8.4<br />
11.3<br />
17.5<br />
10.8<br />
11.7<br />
(0.0)<br />
4.0<br />
8.8<br />
10.9<br />
8.9<br />
5.0<br />
8.6<br />
8.2<br />
8.7<br />
4.9<br />
10.2<br />
4.6<br />
11.0<br />
6.7<br />
2.1<br />
*<br />
8.6<br />
19.4<br />
6.6<br />
7.2<br />
17.9<br />
7.4<br />
6.3<br />
(6.5)<br />
9.6<br />
9.7<br />
10.4<br />
8.0<br />
6.8<br />
8.6<br />
10.0<br />
8.6<br />
7.4<br />
10.9<br />
7.8<br />
9.9<br />
11.9<br />
2.1<br />
*<br />
8.5<br />
6.8<br />
8.2<br />
9.7<br />
11.5<br />
8.6<br />
8.8<br />
(54.8)<br />
61.1<br />
55.6<br />
53.9<br />
62.9<br />
58.7<br />
58.7<br />
56.0<br />
65.8<br />
57.9<br />
45.0<br />
42.4<br />
69.2<br />
42.5<br />
7.3<br />
*<br />
37.4<br />
41.2<br />
62.8<br />
62.4<br />
53.0<br />
65.3<br />
48.1<br />
(3.2)<br />
3.9<br />
5.7<br />
4.8<br />
5.5<br />
5.7<br />
3.9<br />
8.4<br />
5.4<br />
2.7<br />
6.5<br />
4.6<br />
5.9<br />
3.4<br />
0.4<br />
*<br />
3.9<br />
2.5<br />
5.8<br />
5.8<br />
6.4<br />
4.4<br />
6.1<br />
34<br />
528<br />
1,449<br />
1,518<br />
1,374<br />
645<br />
3,807<br />
1,739<br />
2,787<br />
1,030<br />
1,729<br />
1,892<br />
3,333<br />
200<br />
105<br />
16<br />
557<br />
541<br />
1,011<br />
3,418<br />
752<br />
2,944<br />
1,851<br />
Total<br />
53.8<br />
10,308<br />
77.0<br />
86.1<br />
25.6<br />
14.4<br />
24.3<br />
12.0<br />
8.5<br />
9.1<br />
57.9<br />
5.3<br />
5,547<br />
Note: Total includes 2 women with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate women with no years of schooling are also included.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases<br />
146
The government has been using mass media, such as television, radio, and newspaper<br />
extensively to increase awareness among the general public about HIV/AIDS and its prevention.<br />
The women who were aware of HIV/AIDS reported sources of information as ‘radio’ (77 percent),<br />
’television’ (86percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’ (26 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />
hoardings’ (14 percent),’doctor’ (24 percent),’health worker’ (12 percent),’school teacher’ (eight<br />
percent),’community meeting’ (nine percent),’relations/friends’ (58 percent). The mass media and<br />
print media are the main sources of awareness about HIV/AIDS of the women.<br />
Table 8.11 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard<br />
about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from specific sources by selected background<br />
characteristics in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />
was 65 percent as against 48 percent in RCH Round-I.<br />
Knowledge of HIV/AIDS among men was 68 percent in the state – 64 percent in rural<br />
areas and 82 percent in urban areas (Figure 8.4). The percentage of men who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS was 63 percent for men aged below 25 years as against 72 percent for men aged 25-<br />
34 years and 67 percent for men aged 35-44 years, while it was 83 percent for women aged 45<br />
years and above. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (94<br />
percent) for Buddhist, followed by 92 percent for Sikh and the lowest (65 percent) for Hindus,<br />
while it was 68 percent for Muslims. Sixty-two percent of scheduled caste men as against 34<br />
percent of scheduled tribe men and 71 percent of OBC men have heard about HIV/AIDS, while<br />
it was 77 percent for other caste men. The percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS<br />
was the highest (85 percent) for men who had studied for 10 years and above and the lowest (50<br />
percent) for non-literate men, while it was 66 percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years.<br />
Similarly, percentage of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS was the highest (80 percent) for<br />
men with high SLI and the lowest (46 percent) for men with low SLI, while it was 70 percent for<br />
men with medium SLI. These data suggest that there exists positive association between percent<br />
of men who have heard about HIV/AIDS and education and standard of living index of men.<br />
Figure 8.4<br />
Awarness of HIV/AIDS by Sex According to Residence<br />
Total<br />
Women<br />
54<br />
Men<br />
68<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Women<br />
49<br />
Men<br />
64<br />
Urban<br />
Women<br />
71<br />
Men<br />
82<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />
Jammu & Kashmir, DLHS-RCH, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percent<br />
147
Table 8.11 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />
Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about RTI/STI and among men who have heard about RTI/STI, percentage who received information from specific sources<br />
by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong>.<br />
Background Characteristic<br />
Percentage<br />
who have<br />
heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Number of<br />
men<br />
Radio<br />
Television<br />
Among those who have heard about HIV/AIDS, percentage who received information from.<br />
Newspaper/<br />
Books/<br />
Magazines<br />
Slogan/<br />
Pamphlets/<br />
Posters/ Wall<br />
Hoardings<br />
Doctor<br />
<strong>Health</strong><br />
worker<br />
School<br />
teacher<br />
Community<br />
Meeting<br />
Relative/<br />
Friends<br />
Others<br />
Number of<br />
men who<br />
have heard<br />
about<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Age group (years)<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Other<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
63.5<br />
71.8<br />
66.7<br />
63.2<br />
63.7<br />
81.7<br />
50.4<br />
66.2<br />
84.9<br />
65.2<br />
67.7<br />
92.4<br />
94.4<br />
(70.0)<br />
62.1<br />
34.0<br />
71.4<br />
77.4<br />
46.4<br />
70.0<br />
80.2<br />
181<br />
3,549<br />
5,257<br />
1,251<br />
7,801<br />
2,438<br />
3,797<br />
2,252<br />
4,174<br />
3,394<br />
6,367<br />
301<br />
146<br />
30<br />
1,075<br />
1,391<br />
1,736<br />
5,830<br />
2,119<br />
5,272<br />
2,847<br />
79.1<br />
83.0<br />
83.9<br />
76.3<br />
87.0<br />
71.8<br />
91.7<br />
80.4<br />
78.8<br />
64.4<br />
92.9<br />
76.2<br />
67.6<br />
*<br />
69.9<br />
74.8<br />
87.3<br />
84.2<br />
84.5<br />
89.8<br />
70.2<br />
92.5<br />
87.7<br />
87.4<br />
89.0<br />
86.9<br />
89.9<br />
82.3<br />
87.0<br />
90.9<br />
87.7<br />
87.5<br />
94.4<br />
82.2<br />
*<br />
89.1<br />
79.8<br />
85.1<br />
89.1<br />
72.2<br />
91.7<br />
88.1<br />
36.3<br />
37.0<br />
34.5<br />
41.1<br />
31.0<br />
49.2<br />
9.8<br />
24.3<br />
55.4<br />
50.3<br />
27.7<br />
53.2<br />
41.6<br />
*<br />
39.0<br />
32.2<br />
27.1<br />
38.9<br />
22.2<br />
29.5<br />
53.0<br />
16.4<br />
19.5<br />
18.0<br />
22.7<br />
14.7<br />
29.8<br />
7.4<br />
9.7<br />
29.3<br />
30.9<br />
12.8<br />
20.1<br />
22.9<br />
*<br />
25.3<br />
18.6<br />
7.5<br />
21.6<br />
18.1<br />
11.9<br />
31.0<br />
13.0<br />
24.5<br />
22.1<br />
21.8<br />
23.9<br />
19.9<br />
23.5<br />
16.4<br />
25.1<br />
18.0<br />
25.7<br />
22.1<br />
12.1<br />
*<br />
15.4<br />
12.7<br />
21.0<br />
25.6<br />
24.3<br />
22.1<br />
23.3<br />
10.9<br />
12.8<br />
12.4<br />
11.0<br />
11.8<br />
13.7<br />
11.1<br />
12.4<br />
13.1<br />
9.5<br />
14.0<br />
13.7<br />
7.0<br />
*<br />
8.4<br />
13.9<br />
9.3<br />
13.7<br />
13.0<br />
12.3<br />
12.2<br />
5.6<br />
8.1<br />
8.2<br />
6.8<br />
8.2<br />
7.2<br />
6.5<br />
4.3<br />
10.2<br />
3.4<br />
10.1<br />
12.1<br />
4.8<br />
*<br />
4.9<br />
8.4<br />
4.5<br />
9.4<br />
9.2<br />
8.5<br />
6.4<br />
6.0<br />
12.0<br />
10.3<br />
8.6<br />
10.4<br />
11.3<br />
9.0<br />
8.1<br />
12.6<br />
7.7<br />
12.3<br />
13.3<br />
3.3<br />
*<br />
9.9<br />
10.8<br />
10.8<br />
10.8<br />
8.7<br />
11.9<br />
9.5<br />
53.9<br />
55.0<br />
53.5<br />
44.3<br />
52.1<br />
55.4<br />
60.8<br />
54.9<br />
48.1<br />
45.4<br />
58.9<br />
46.1<br />
7.7<br />
*<br />
40.9<br />
14.4<br />
57.2<br />
58.2<br />
43.4<br />
58.7<br />
47.9<br />
1.7<br />
4.3<br />
4.7<br />
3.2<br />
3.5<br />
6.3<br />
6.2<br />
1.7<br />
4.4<br />
2.2<br />
5.1<br />
10.5<br />
0.7<br />
*<br />
3.4<br />
2.2<br />
3.6<br />
4.9<br />
6.2<br />
3.8<br />
4.4<br />
115<br />
2,549<br />
3,5<strong>04</strong><br />
791<br />
4,967<br />
1,993<br />
1,912<br />
1,492<br />
3,544<br />
2,212<br />
4,309<br />
279<br />
138<br />
21<br />
667<br />
473<br />
1,241<br />
4,510<br />
983<br />
3,693<br />
2,283<br />
Total<br />
68.0<br />
10,239<br />
82.6<br />
87.7<br />
36.2<br />
19.0<br />
22.8<br />
12.4<br />
7.9<br />
10.7<br />
53.0<br />
4.3<br />
6,959<br />
Note: Table includes 16 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to don’t and missing cases. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
* Percentages not shown: based on few cases.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases.<br />
148
The government has been using mass media, such as television, radio, and newspaper<br />
extensively to increase awareness among the general public about HIV/AIDS and its prevention.<br />
The men who were aware of HIV/AIDS reported sources of information as ‘radio’ (83 percent),<br />
’television’(88 percent),’newspaper/books/magazines’(36 percent),’slogan/pamphlets/posters/wall<br />
hoardings’ (19 percent),’doctor’ (23 percent),’health worker’ (12 percent),’school teacher’ (eight<br />
percent),’community meeting’ (11 percent),’relations/friends’ (53 percent). The mass media and<br />
print media are the main sources of awareness about HIV/AIDS of the women.<br />
8.5.2 Knowledge of Mode of Transmission about HIV/AIDS<br />
Table 8.12 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the state.<br />
The percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was<br />
over five percent in the state – seven percent in rural areas and three percent in urban areas. The<br />
percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was the<br />
lowest (three percent) in the age group 20-24 years and the highest (nine percent) in the age group<br />
40-44 years. Seven percent of Hindu women as against five percent of Muslim women and over<br />
four percent for Sikh women said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while<br />
it was six percent for Buddhist women. Similarly, eight percent of scheduled caste women as<br />
against seven percent of scheduled tribe women and over five percent of OBC women said ’do not<br />
know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while it was five percent for other caste women.<br />
The percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was<br />
eight percent for women who had studied for 0-9 years as against over three percent for women<br />
who had studied for 10 years and above, while it was six percent for non-literate women. Similarly,<br />
percentage of women who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was six<br />
percent for women with low and medium SLI as against five percent for women with high SLI.<br />
Among women who were aware of mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS reported different<br />
ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (44 percent),‘heterosexual intercourse’<br />
(76 percent),’needles/blades/skin puncture’ (44 percent),’mother to child’ (49 percent), ’transfusion<br />
of infected blood’ (55 percent) and ‘other’ (13 percent).<br />
Table 8.13 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected background characteristics in the<br />
state. The percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />
was six percent in the state – six percent in rural areas and five percent in urban areas. The<br />
percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was the<br />
lowest (five percent) in the age group 25-34 years and the highest (nine percent) in the age group<br />
45 years and above. Nine percent of Hindu men as against five percent of Muslim men and two<br />
percent of Sikh men said ’do not know’ about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS, while it was<br />
three percent for Buddhist men. Seven percent of scheduled caste men as against five percent of<br />
scheduled tribe men and six percent of OBS and other caste men said ‘do not know’ about mode of<br />
transmission of HIV/AIDS. The percentage of men who said ’do not know’ about mode of<br />
transmission of HIV/AIDS was the highest (nine percent) for men who had studied for 0-9 years<br />
and the lowest (over three percent) for women who had studied for 10 years and above, while it<br />
was eight percent for non-literate men. Similarly, percentage of men who said ’do not know’<br />
about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS was eight percent for men with low SLI as against five<br />
percent for men with medium SLI, while it was six percent for men with high SLI.<br />
149
Table 8.12 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />
Percentage currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard of HIV/AIDS, knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Age<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhis<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
Homo<br />
sexual<br />
intercourse<br />
(29.0)<br />
37.3<br />
47.4<br />
45.1<br />
41.8<br />
44.0<br />
38.1<br />
57.0<br />
39.3<br />
37.3<br />
55.5<br />
54.5<br />
38.2<br />
46.9<br />
33.0<br />
44.4<br />
29.0<br />
30.8<br />
50.3<br />
45.3<br />
37.5<br />
53.8<br />
Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />
Hetero<br />
sexual<br />
intercourse<br />
(80.6)<br />
71.7<br />
75.3<br />
77.0<br />
78.1<br />
76.1<br />
75.3<br />
78.3<br />
84.3<br />
68.8<br />
67.6<br />
59.8<br />
86.8<br />
54.3<br />
80.0<br />
51.3<br />
83.9<br />
80.7<br />
77.7<br />
76.5<br />
82.7<br />
65.9<br />
Needles/<br />
blade/ skin<br />
puncture<br />
(77.4)<br />
54.9<br />
46.3<br />
41.2<br />
38.3<br />
45.2<br />
41.2<br />
49.3<br />
35.8<br />
47.3<br />
54.4<br />
48.7<br />
40.1<br />
54.6<br />
49.0<br />
52.2<br />
72.7<br />
30.4<br />
41.7<br />
52.7<br />
38.9<br />
47.8<br />
Mother<br />
to<br />
child<br />
(29.0)<br />
37.7<br />
48.3<br />
52.0<br />
52.0<br />
51.0<br />
45.0<br />
58.9<br />
46.3<br />
55.0<br />
50.9<br />
42.1<br />
54.3<br />
50.2<br />
24.3<br />
42.8<br />
25.3<br />
54.8<br />
52.8<br />
34.0<br />
53.0<br />
49.9<br />
Transfusion<br />
of<br />
infected<br />
blood<br />
(22.6)<br />
46.8<br />
54.8<br />
53.7<br />
60.9<br />
56.8<br />
54.0<br />
57.9<br />
53.9<br />
61.0<br />
53.9<br />
47.4<br />
60.7<br />
60.5<br />
12.6<br />
55.1<br />
24.6<br />
57.2<br />
59.8<br />
44.9<br />
58.8<br />
53.7<br />
Other<br />
(9.7)<br />
8.9<br />
12.4<br />
12.8<br />
13.5<br />
14.8<br />
9.4<br />
19.8<br />
10.6<br />
16.2<br />
13.9<br />
13.6<br />
12.6<br />
10.2<br />
3.3<br />
14.3<br />
21.0<br />
11.8<br />
11.4<br />
16.6<br />
11.8<br />
12.4<br />
Do<br />
not<br />
know<br />
(0.0)<br />
2.9<br />
4.6<br />
4.3<br />
7.4<br />
9.1<br />
6.8<br />
2.7<br />
6.0<br />
7.8<br />
3.4<br />
6.8<br />
4.9<br />
4.3<br />
6.2<br />
8.0<br />
7.0<br />
5.5<br />
4.9<br />
6.1<br />
5.9<br />
4.7<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
who have<br />
heard of<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
34<br />
528<br />
1,449<br />
1,518<br />
1,374<br />
645<br />
3,807<br />
1,739<br />
2,787<br />
1,030<br />
1,729<br />
1,892<br />
3,333<br />
200<br />
105<br />
557<br />
541<br />
1,011<br />
3,418<br />
752<br />
2,944<br />
1,851<br />
Total<br />
44.0<br />
76.2<br />
43.7<br />
49.4<br />
55.2<br />
12.7<br />
5.5<br />
5,547<br />
Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases. @ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
Among men who were aware of mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS and reported different<br />
ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS such as ‘homosexual intercourse’ (50 percent),‘heterosexual<br />
intercourse’ (77 percent),’needles/blades/skin puncture’ (47 percent),’mother to child’ (52 percent),<br />
’transfusion of infected blood’ (59 percent) and ‘other’ (13 percent). These data clearly bring out<br />
rural-urban differentials in the responses about mode of transmission of HIV/AIDS.<br />
8.5.3 How to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />
All the respondents, male and female, were asked about how to prevent HIV/AIDS. The percentage<br />
of women who said that HIV/AIDS could be avoided by various ways has been presented in Table<br />
8.14 by selected background characteristics. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />
how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent in the state – five percent in rural areas and four<br />
percent in urban areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />
was the highest (10 percent) for women aged 40-44 years and the lowest (two percent) for<br />
women aged 20-24 years. The percentage of women who ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />
was five percent for non-literate women and women who had studied for 0-9 years as against<br />
over three percent for women who had studied for 10 years and above. The percentage of women<br />
150
Table 8.13 SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />
Percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard of HIV/AIDS , knowledge of mode of transmission by selected<br />
background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Age<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45+<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
Homosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
56.4<br />
53.6<br />
46.6<br />
50.7<br />
46.0<br />
59.2<br />
46.5<br />
41.8<br />
54.9<br />
58.3<br />
44.7<br />
62.5<br />
44.5<br />
Percentage by knowledge of mode of transmission<br />
Heterosexual<br />
intercourse<br />
67.9<br />
79.6<br />
77.4<br />
70.5<br />
76.9<br />
78.2<br />
80.9<br />
73.3<br />
77.0<br />
60.6<br />
86.2<br />
65.9<br />
89.1<br />
Needles/<br />
blade/ skin<br />
puncture<br />
48.6<br />
48.2<br />
44.1<br />
52.6<br />
43.3<br />
54.9<br />
27.7<br />
43.4<br />
58.2<br />
54.7<br />
42.2<br />
49.5<br />
48.6<br />
Mother<br />
to child<br />
52.7<br />
50.7<br />
52.7<br />
56.3<br />
48.5<br />
61.9<br />
41.3<br />
54.3<br />
57.5<br />
46.6<br />
57.3<br />
38.9<br />
17.4<br />
Transfusion of<br />
infected blood<br />
55.3<br />
60.0<br />
57.8<br />
59.1<br />
56.1<br />
65.2<br />
55.9<br />
57.8<br />
60.5<br />
55.6<br />
62.3<br />
54.1<br />
10.8<br />
Other<br />
10.5<br />
14.0<br />
12.2<br />
15.4<br />
10.1<br />
20.8<br />
11.1<br />
11.3<br />
15.1<br />
14.8<br />
12.9<br />
10.4<br />
3.7<br />
Do not<br />
know<br />
8.5<br />
4.9<br />
5.7<br />
8.8<br />
6.2<br />
4.8<br />
7.6<br />
9.4<br />
3.3<br />
8.8<br />
4.6<br />
1.7<br />
2.7<br />
Number of<br />
men who<br />
have heard<br />
of HIV/AIDS<br />
115<br />
2,549<br />
3,5<strong>04</strong><br />
791<br />
4,967<br />
1,993<br />
1,912<br />
1,492<br />
3,544<br />
2,212<br />
4,309<br />
279<br />
138<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
54.0<br />
47.7<br />
35.8<br />
53.2<br />
58.4<br />
75.3<br />
81.0<br />
79.1<br />
57.1<br />
50.7<br />
27.9<br />
49.8<br />
48.2<br />
37.5<br />
55.5<br />
53.7<br />
57.4<br />
30.4<br />
56.6<br />
62.9<br />
15.2<br />
20.8<br />
10.9<br />
12.6<br />
6.7<br />
4.9<br />
6.1<br />
5.7<br />
667<br />
473<br />
1,241<br />
4,510<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
59.4<br />
43.0<br />
56.6<br />
75.7<br />
82.6<br />
69.3<br />
41.8<br />
42.8<br />
55.0<br />
37.7<br />
55.1<br />
54.3<br />
46.9<br />
61.0<br />
60.2<br />
15.7<br />
11.7<br />
14.5<br />
8.1<br />
5.4<br />
5.6<br />
983<br />
3,693<br />
2,283<br />
Total<br />
49.8 77.3 46.6 52.4 58.7 13.2 5.8 6,959<br />
Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in other<br />
religion who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to<br />
N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was about five percent irrespective of the<br />
household standard of living index of the women. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’<br />
how to avoid HIV/AIDS was six percent for Hindu women as against four percent for Muslim<br />
women and two percent for Sikh women, while it was five percent for Buddhist. The percentage<br />
of women who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was four percent for scheduled-caste<br />
women as against over five percent for scheduled tribe women and over three percent for OBC<br />
women, while it was five percent for other caste women.<br />
Further, percentage of women who reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘sex with only<br />
one partner’ (81 percent),’using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ (69 percent),<br />
‘sterilizing needles and syringe for injection’ (42 percent each),‘checking blood prior to<br />
transfusion’ (60 percent) and ‘avoiding pregnancy when having HIV/AIDS’ (45 percent). All the<br />
specific ways except ‘using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ to avoid HIV/AIDS<br />
reported by women were higher in urban areas than in rural areas. However, percentage of<br />
women who said HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘using condom correctly during each sexual<br />
intercourse’ was higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />
151
Table 8.14 KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AVOIDANCE OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />
Among currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of women reported HIV/AIDS can be<br />
avoided in specific ways by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Sex<br />
With<br />
Only<br />
one partner<br />
Percentage reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by:<br />
Using<br />
condoms<br />
correctly<br />
during each<br />
sexual<br />
intercourse<br />
Checking<br />
blood prior to<br />
transfusion<br />
Sterilizing<br />
needles and<br />
syringes<br />
for injection<br />
Avoiding<br />
pregnancy<br />
when having<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Other<br />
Do not<br />
know<br />
To<br />
avoid<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
women<br />
Age<br />
15-19<br />
20-24<br />
25-29<br />
30-34<br />
35-39<br />
40-44<br />
(83.9)<br />
71.3<br />
86.5<br />
82.2<br />
80.7<br />
78.1<br />
(77.4)<br />
76.7<br />
71.5<br />
69.0<br />
69.0<br />
59.4<br />
(22.6)<br />
53.9<br />
62.6<br />
62.1<br />
61.6<br />
56.6<br />
(32.3)<br />
36.3<br />
47.0<br />
41.5<br />
37.9<br />
42.1<br />
(19.4)<br />
38.3<br />
40.5<br />
47.4<br />
48.7<br />
45.5<br />
(6.5)<br />
12.7<br />
13.2<br />
13.3<br />
12.8<br />
13.6<br />
(3.2)<br />
2.0<br />
4.0<br />
3.7<br />
5.0<br />
10.4<br />
34<br />
528<br />
1,449<br />
1,518<br />
1,374<br />
645<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
79.7<br />
85.4<br />
72.4<br />
62.4<br />
57.4<br />
67.1<br />
38.6<br />
48.2<br />
41.5<br />
51.3<br />
9.3<br />
21.4<br />
4.9<br />
4.2<br />
3,807<br />
1,739<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
80.4<br />
81.7<br />
83.2<br />
73.7<br />
62.5<br />
66.2<br />
61.0<br />
57.2<br />
61.4<br />
32.1<br />
47.9<br />
53.1<br />
46.9<br />
47.2<br />
39.3<br />
12.9<br />
12.9<br />
13.4<br />
5.1<br />
5.4<br />
3.5<br />
2,787<br />
1,030<br />
1,729<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
82.5<br />
82.9<br />
82.8<br />
19.1<br />
61.3<br />
73.7<br />
68.5<br />
74.0<br />
50.0<br />
66.4<br />
60.2<br />
59.9<br />
50.3<br />
36.5<br />
51.7<br />
22.6<br />
32.3<br />
53.3<br />
36.7<br />
8.2<br />
11.4<br />
14.6<br />
10.7<br />
1.8<br />
5.6<br />
4.3<br />
2.0<br />
4.9<br />
1,892<br />
3,333<br />
200<br />
105<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
83.2<br />
43.0<br />
87.0<br />
85.6<br />
72.3<br />
76.0<br />
71.2<br />
67.0<br />
52.1<br />
43.5<br />
63.4<br />
63.7<br />
53.2<br />
30.1<br />
32.1<br />
44.5<br />
31.2<br />
14.7<br />
53.6<br />
49.0<br />
14.2<br />
11.6<br />
13.3<br />
13.1<br />
4.0<br />
5.5<br />
3.3<br />
5.1<br />
557<br />
541<br />
1,011<br />
3,418<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
66.5<br />
84.4<br />
82.9<br />
83.4<br />
71.2<br />
60.6<br />
45.4<br />
65.5<br />
58.4<br />
35.7<br />
38.7<br />
48.7<br />
29.5<br />
52.5<br />
38.0<br />
18.7<br />
11.8<br />
12.8<br />
5.1<br />
4.5<br />
4.8<br />
752<br />
2,944<br />
1851<br />
Total<br />
81.5<br />
69.3<br />
60.4<br />
41.6<br />
44.6<br />
13.1<br />
4.7<br />
5,547<br />
Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
() Based on less than 50 unweighted cases<br />
@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included.<br />
# Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
Table 8.15 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, percentage of men who reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided in specific ways by<br />
selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’<br />
how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent in the state – over five percent in rural areas and over<br />
four percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid<br />
HIV/AIDS was over 11 percent for men aged below 25 years, while it was around five percent<br />
for other age groups. The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was<br />
seven percent for men who had studied for 0-9 years as against three percent for men who had<br />
studied for 10 years and above, while it was eight percent for non-literate men. The percentage of<br />
men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was seven percent for Hindus as against<br />
152
Table 8.15 KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AVOIDANCE OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />
Among husbands of currently married women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of men reported HIV/AIDS can be<br />
avoided in specific ways by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background<br />
characteristic<br />
Sex with<br />
only one<br />
partner<br />
Percentage reported HIV/AIDS can be avoided by:<br />
Using condoms<br />
correctly during<br />
each sexual<br />
intercourse<br />
Checking<br />
blood prior to<br />
transfusion<br />
Sterilizing<br />
needles and<br />
syringes for<br />
injection<br />
Avoiding<br />
pregnancy<br />
when having<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Other<br />
Do not<br />
know to<br />
avoid<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Number<br />
of men<br />
Age<br />
Below 25<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45+<br />
81.6<br />
85.8<br />
81.7<br />
83.3<br />
66.3<br />
73.6<br />
71.7<br />
66.8<br />
56.7<br />
63.7<br />
63.1<br />
58.5<br />
38.1<br />
47.2<br />
43.1<br />
47.1<br />
35.5<br />
44.3<br />
45.6<br />
46.5<br />
9.2<br />
12.1<br />
10.9<br />
14.4<br />
11.3<br />
5.2<br />
4.8<br />
4.9<br />
115<br />
2,549<br />
3,5<strong>04</strong><br />
791<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
81.8<br />
87.4<br />
74.5<br />
64.9<br />
59.5<br />
70.6<br />
42.3<br />
51.7<br />
41.2<br />
54.7<br />
9.2<br />
18.0<br />
5.3<br />
4.4<br />
4,967<br />
1,993<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
81.8<br />
84.8<br />
83.7<br />
72.5<br />
65.0<br />
74.1<br />
62.0<br />
59.5<br />
64.5<br />
29.6<br />
48.2<br />
51.9<br />
41.2<br />
48.9<br />
45.5<br />
10.2<br />
9.5<br />
13.4<br />
7.8<br />
7.3<br />
2.6<br />
1,912<br />
1,492<br />
3,544<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
83.5<br />
84.7<br />
87.9<br />
31.2<br />
64.4<br />
74.4<br />
79.1<br />
92.7<br />
54.6<br />
68.1<br />
49.6<br />
51.4<br />
52.3<br />
42.2<br />
43.9<br />
15.9<br />
36.9<br />
51.8<br />
28.0<br />
5.9<br />
10.1<br />
13.1<br />
7.5<br />
2.4<br />
6.6<br />
4.6<br />
1.1<br />
2.6<br />
2,212<br />
4,309<br />
279<br />
138<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
81.8<br />
48.5<br />
88.7<br />
86.2<br />
74.9<br />
80.2<br />
68.0<br />
71.1<br />
55.5<br />
44.7<br />
63.1<br />
66.0<br />
49.8<br />
27.0<br />
33.7<br />
49.5<br />
35.0<br />
23.2<br />
49.6<br />
48.0<br />
13.3<br />
12.9<br />
10.9<br />
11.5<br />
4.7<br />
4.7<br />
3.6<br />
5.6<br />
667<br />
473<br />
1,241<br />
4,510<br />
Standard of living<br />
index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
76.1<br />
85.6<br />
82.9<br />
79.5<br />
72.2<br />
67.6<br />
50.4<br />
67.8<br />
59.8<br />
36.5<br />
43.8<br />
50.5<br />
30.7<br />
49.9<br />
43.6<br />
18.4<br />
9.8<br />
11.9<br />
6.6<br />
5.0<br />
4.4<br />
983<br />
3,693<br />
2,283<br />
Total<br />
83.4<br />
71.7<br />
62.7<br />
45.0<br />
45.1<br />
11.7<br />
5.0<br />
6,959<br />
Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in other<br />
religion who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
five percent for Muslims and one percent for Sikhs, while it was three percent for Buddhist.<br />
The percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was five percent for<br />
SC/ST men as against four percent for OBC men and six percent for other caste men. The<br />
percentage of men who said ‘do not know’ how to avoid HIV/AIDS was seven percent for men<br />
with low SLI and five percent for men with medium SLI, while it was over four percent for men<br />
with high SLI. The percentage of men who heard about HIV/AIDS reported it can be avoided by<br />
‘sex with only one partner’ (83 percent),’using condoms correctly during each sexual intercourse’<br />
(72 percent),’checking blood prior to transfusion’ (63 percent),’sterilizing needles and syringes<br />
for injection’ (45 percent) and ’avoiding pregnancy when having HIV/AIDS’ (45 percent). All<br />
the specific ways except ‘using condom correctly during each sexual intercourse’ to avoid<br />
HIV/AIDS reported by men were higher in urban areas than in rural areas. However, percentage<br />
of men who said HIV/AIDS can be avoided by ‘using condom correctly during each sexual<br />
intercourse’ was higher in rural areas than in urban areas.<br />
153
8.5.4 Misconception about HIV/AIDS<br />
People generally have misconceptions about the ways of transmission of HIV/AIDS, such as<br />
‘shaking hands with a person having AIDS’, hugging and kissing with them, sharing their clothes<br />
or sharing eating utensils, stepping on urine/stool, through insect bites, for example, being bitten<br />
by mosquitoes, fleas and bedbugs. All these questions were asked to the respondents who had<br />
heard of HIV/AIDS.<br />
Table 8.16 gives percentage of currently married women aged 15-44 years who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, percentage of women having misconceptions about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by<br />
selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of women having misconception<br />
about the transmission of HIV/AIDS reported as ‘shaking hands’ (seven percent), ’hugging’<br />
(nine percent),’kissing’ (17 percent),’sharing clothes’ (seven percent),’sharing eating utensils’ (five<br />
percent),’stepping on urine/stool’ (six percent) and ’mosquito, flea or bedbugs biting’ (14 percent).<br />
Table 8.16 MISCONCEPTION ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG WOMEN<br />
Among currently married women aged 15-44 who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of women having misconception<br />
about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Percentage having misconception about the transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />
Shaking<br />
hands Hugging Kissing<br />
Sharing<br />
clothes<br />
Sharing<br />
eating<br />
utensils<br />
Stepping on<br />
Urine / stool<br />
Mosquito, flea,<br />
or bedbugs<br />
biting<br />
Number of<br />
women<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
7.4<br />
7.1<br />
10.5<br />
4.9<br />
22.8<br />
5.8<br />
7.9<br />
3.8<br />
6.2<br />
2.4<br />
6.7<br />
5.1<br />
13.5<br />
13.7<br />
3,807<br />
1,739<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
7.8<br />
6.9<br />
6.7<br />
11.4<br />
5.2<br />
6.6<br />
25.0<br />
10.5<br />
9.6<br />
7.4<br />
6.0<br />
5.7<br />
5.0<br />
4.6<br />
5.2<br />
6.1<br />
5.9<br />
6.5<br />
14.9<br />
6.0<br />
15.9<br />
2,787<br />
1,030<br />
1,729<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
7.8<br />
7.6<br />
1.6<br />
0.4<br />
5.0<br />
11.5<br />
2.9<br />
2.3<br />
11.0<br />
21.7<br />
15.2<br />
7.8<br />
6.4<br />
7.0<br />
4.3<br />
1.1<br />
6.5<br />
4.2<br />
6.0<br />
0.9<br />
6.2<br />
6.3<br />
6.0<br />
2.1<br />
11.3<br />
15.0<br />
17.0<br />
5.1<br />
1,892<br />
3,333<br />
200<br />
105<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
8.5<br />
23.4<br />
5.8<br />
4.9<br />
5.2<br />
21.8<br />
6.3<br />
8.0<br />
17.4<br />
28.9<br />
18.6<br />
15.5<br />
7.7<br />
22.6<br />
6.7<br />
3.8<br />
10.4<br />
7.5<br />
4.4<br />
3.9<br />
8.4<br />
8.5<br />
6.7<br />
5.3<br />
11.8<br />
23.7<br />
14.8<br />
11.9<br />
557<br />
541<br />
1,011<br />
3,418<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
17.8<br />
6.1<br />
4.9<br />
22.2<br />
8.7<br />
3.4<br />
36.6<br />
19.1<br />
7.2<br />
15.6<br />
6.6<br />
2.9<br />
7.7<br />
5.8<br />
2.6<br />
13.2<br />
5.5<br />
4.4<br />
21.3<br />
12.3<br />
12.4<br />
752<br />
2,944<br />
1,851<br />
Total<br />
7.3<br />
8.8<br />
17.5<br />
6.6<br />
5.0<br />
6.2<br />
13.6<br />
5,547<br />
Note: Total includes 16 women in other religion who were not shown separately.<br />
@ Literate women with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
Table 8.17 gives percentage of husbands of currently married women who have heard<br />
about HIV/AIDS, percentage of men having misconceptions about the transmission of HIV/AIDS by<br />
selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of men having misconception<br />
about the transmission of HIV/AIDS reported as ‘shaking hands’ (four percent), ’hugging’<br />
154
(seven percent), ’kissing’ (16 percent),’sharing clothes’ (four percent),’sharing eating utensils’ (five<br />
percent), ’stepping on urine/stool’ (seven percent) and ’mosquito, flea or bedbugs biting’ (15<br />
percent). The data shows that percentage of men having misconceptions about the transmission<br />
of HIV/AIDS was higher in rural areas than urban areas.<br />
Table 8.17 MISCONCEPTION ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MEN<br />
Among husbands currently married women who have heard about HIV/AIDS, the percentage of men having misconception about<br />
the transmission of HIV/AIDS by selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Percentage having misconception about the transmission of HIV/AIDS<br />
Shaking<br />
hands Hugging Kissing<br />
4.2<br />
4.4<br />
8.5<br />
3.4<br />
20.2<br />
6.4<br />
Sharing<br />
clothes<br />
4.7<br />
3.5<br />
Sharing<br />
eating<br />
utensils<br />
6.4<br />
3.0<br />
Stepping on<br />
Urine / stool<br />
8.3<br />
3.7<br />
Mosquito, flea, or<br />
bedbugs biting<br />
15.7<br />
14.2<br />
Number of<br />
men<br />
4,967<br />
1,993<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
5.0<br />
2.8<br />
4.5<br />
12.8<br />
3.9<br />
5.3<br />
31.3<br />
8.2<br />
11.5<br />
6.1<br />
3.3<br />
3.9<br />
7.2<br />
3.9<br />
5.1<br />
9.7<br />
4.6<br />
6.5<br />
20.0<br />
8.5<br />
15.6<br />
1,912<br />
1,492<br />
3,544<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
5.6<br />
3.7<br />
3.9<br />
0.3<br />
4.9<br />
8.2<br />
8.6<br />
3.3<br />
10.2<br />
18.8<br />
24.2<br />
16.9<br />
5.9<br />
3.4<br />
7.5<br />
1.8<br />
6.0<br />
4.3<br />
15.8<br />
8.2<br />
5.9<br />
6.5<br />
19.9<br />
8.5<br />
12.1<br />
15.4<br />
35.0<br />
24.4<br />
2,212<br />
4,309<br />
279<br />
138<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
7.3<br />
4.1<br />
3.8<br />
4.0<br />
7.1<br />
7.8<br />
5.6<br />
7.4<br />
15.7<br />
24.9<br />
17.6<br />
15.2<br />
9.4<br />
6.6<br />
4.8<br />
3.3<br />
10.3<br />
7.4<br />
6.5<br />
4.2<br />
9.9<br />
13.7<br />
8.2<br />
5.6<br />
15.5<br />
23.4<br />
17.8<br />
14.0<br />
667<br />
473<br />
1,241<br />
4,510<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
6.7<br />
3.8<br />
4.0<br />
15.7<br />
7.1<br />
3.3<br />
33.1<br />
17.1<br />
7.5<br />
6.5<br />
4.4<br />
3.3<br />
10.9<br />
5.3<br />
3.2<br />
13.0<br />
6.8<br />
4.6<br />
23.0<br />
14.5<br />
13.3<br />
983<br />
3,693<br />
2,283<br />
Total<br />
4.3<br />
7.0<br />
16.2<br />
Note: Table includes 11 men with missing information on education who were not shown separately. Total includes 21 men in<br />
other religion who were not shown separately. @ Literate men with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not<br />
add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
8.5.5 Knowledge of Curability of HIV/AIDS<br />
Table 8.18 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands, who have heard about<br />
HIV/AIDS, percent distribution of respondents by knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS, by<br />
selected background characteristics in the state. The percentage of women who heard about HIV/<br />
AIDS and said that it is curable was 19 percent in the state – 22 percent in rural areas and 12<br />
percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of women who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that<br />
it is not curable was 57 percent in the state – 53 percent in rural areas and 67 percent in urban<br />
areas. The percentage of women who said ‘do not know’ about the curability of HIV/AIDS was<br />
24 percent in the state – 25 percent in rural areas and 20 percent in urban areas.<br />
The percentage of women who said HIV/AIDS is curable was nine percent for women<br />
who had studied for 0-9 years as against 10 percent for women who had studied for 10 years and<br />
above and 27 percent for non-literate women. Five percent of Hindu women as against 27<br />
percent of Muslim women and 15 percent of Sikh women said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it<br />
4.3<br />
5.4<br />
6.9<br />
15.3<br />
6,959<br />
155
was over five percent for Buddhist women. Seventeen percent of scheduled caste women as against<br />
25 percent scheduled tribe women and 19 percent of OBC women said that HIV/AIDS is curable,<br />
while it was 18 percent for other caste women. The percentage of women who said HIV/AIDS is<br />
curable was 21 percent for women with medium SLI as against eight percent for women with<br />
high SLI and 36 percent for women with low SLI.<br />
The percentage of men who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that it is curable was 21<br />
percent in the state – 24 percent in rural areas and 13 percent in urban areas. Similarly, percentage of<br />
men who heard about HIV/AIDS and said that it is not curable was 55 percent in the state – 50<br />
percent in rural areas and 69 percent in urban areas. The percentage of men who said ‘do not<br />
know’ about the curability of HIV/AIDS was 24 percent in the state – 26 percent in rural areas<br />
and 18 percent in urban areas.<br />
The percentage of men who said HIV/AIDS is curable was 10 percent for men who had<br />
studied for 0-9 years as against 16 percent for men who had studied for 10 years and above and 37<br />
percent for non-literate men. Over six percent of Hindu men as against 27 percent of Muslim<br />
men and 34 percent of Sikh men said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it was over 12 percent for<br />
Buddhist men. Seventeen percent of scheduled caste men as against 27 percent of scheduled tribe<br />
men and 21 percent of OBC men said that HIV/AIDS is curable, while it was 20 percent for<br />
other caste men. The percentage of men who said HIV/AIDS is curable was 23 percent for men<br />
with medium SLI as against 11 percent for men with high SLI and 32 percent for men with low SLI.<br />
Table 8.18 KNOWLEDGE OF CURABILITY ABOUT HIV/AIDS<br />
Among currently married women and their husbands, who have heard about HIV/AIDS, Percent distribution of respondents by<br />
knowledge of curability about HIV/AIDS, according to some selected background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Background characteristic<br />
Residence<br />
<strong>Rural</strong><br />
Urban<br />
Percent distribution of women<br />
Percent distribution of men<br />
Number of<br />
Yes No Do not know women Yes No Do not know<br />
21.6<br />
12.0<br />
52.9<br />
67.5<br />
25.5<br />
20.5<br />
3,807<br />
1,739<br />
23.8<br />
12.6<br />
49.8<br />
69.3<br />
26.0<br />
18.0<br />
Number of<br />
men<br />
4,967<br />
1,993<br />
Education<br />
Non-literate<br />
0-9@ years<br />
10 years and above<br />
27.2<br />
8.9<br />
10.4<br />
47.9<br />
59.9<br />
71.6<br />
24.9<br />
31.2<br />
18.0<br />
2,787<br />
1,030<br />
1,729<br />
37.0<br />
10.2<br />
16.2<br />
31.8<br />
56.5<br />
67.6<br />
31.2<br />
32.6<br />
16.1<br />
1,912<br />
1,492<br />
3,544<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu<br />
Muslim<br />
Sikh<br />
Buddhist<br />
4.7<br />
27.1<br />
15.2<br />
5.5<br />
71.9<br />
47.2<br />
73.8<br />
93.3<br />
23.4<br />
25.7<br />
11.0<br />
1.1<br />
1,892<br />
3,333<br />
200<br />
105<br />
6.5<br />
27.3<br />
34.3<br />
12.5<br />
74.1<br />
44.8<br />
57.5<br />
83.6<br />
19.0<br />
27.8<br />
8.3<br />
3.9<br />
2,212<br />
4,309<br />
279<br />
138<br />
Caste/tribe #<br />
Scheduled caste<br />
Scheduled tribe<br />
Other backward class<br />
Other<br />
17.1<br />
25.4<br />
18.7<br />
17.8<br />
63.2<br />
64.1<br />
46.2<br />
59.0<br />
19.8<br />
10.4<br />
35.1<br />
23.2<br />
557<br />
541<br />
1,011<br />
3,418<br />
17.3<br />
27.2<br />
21.4<br />
20.2<br />
66.7<br />
63.6<br />
44.9<br />
55.6<br />
15.6<br />
8.9<br />
33.5<br />
23.8<br />
667<br />
473<br />
1,241<br />
4,510<br />
Standard of living index<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
36.0<br />
20.6<br />
8.2<br />
51.6<br />
50.0<br />
71.7<br />
12.4<br />
29.3<br />
20.0<br />
752<br />
2,944<br />
1,851<br />
32.5<br />
23.1<br />
11.4<br />
46.1<br />
48.2<br />
71.1<br />
20.6<br />
28.5<br />
17.4<br />
983<br />
3,693<br />
2,283<br />
Total<br />
18.6 57.5<br />
23.9 5,547 20.6 55.4 23.7 6,959<br />
Note: Total includes 11 men with missing information on education who are not shown separately. Total includes 16 women and 21<br />
men in other religion who were not shown separately<br />
@ Literate persons with no year of schooling are also included. # Total figure may not add to N due to do not know and missing cases.<br />
156
8.6 Awareness of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by <strong>District</strong><br />
Table 8.19 gives percentage of currently married women and their husbands aware of RTI/STI<br />
and HIV/AIDS by district in Jammu & Kashmir State. The percentage of currently married women<br />
aware of RTI/STI was the highest (90 percent) in Baramula district, followed by 46 percent in<br />
Leh district and the lowest (zero percent) in Doda district. The percentage of currently married<br />
women aware of RTI/STI was higher than that of the state (15 percent) in Baramula, Kargil and<br />
Leh districts, while in the remaining 11 districts it was lower than that of the state. The percentage of<br />
currently married women aware of HIV/AIDS was the highest (92 percent) in Baramula district,<br />
followed by 91 percent in Leh district and the lowest (11 percent) in Rajouri district. The percentage<br />
of currently married women aware of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (54 percent) in<br />
Anantnag, Baramula, Jammu, Kargil and Leh districts, while in the remaining nine districts it<br />
was lower than that of the state.<br />
Further, percentage of men aware of RTI/STI was the highest (91 percent) in Baramula<br />
district, followed by 52 percent in Leh district and the lowest (over one percent) in Kathua<br />
district. The percentage of men aware of RTI/STI was higher than that of the state (27 percent) in<br />
Badgam, Baramula, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Srinagar districts, while in the remaining<br />
seven districts it was lower than that of the state. Similarly, percentage of men aware of<br />
HIV/AIDS was the highest (99 percent) in Anantnag and Kargil districts, followed by 97 percent<br />
in Baramula district and the lowest (less than one percent) in Doda district. The percentage of men<br />
aware of HIV/AIDS was higher than that of the state (68 percent) in Anantnag, Badgam,<br />
Baramula, Jammu, Kargil, Kupwara, Leh, Pulwama and Poonch districts, while in the remaining<br />
five districts it was lower than that of the state.<br />
Table 8.19 AWARENESS OF RTI/STI AND HIV/AIDS BY DISTRICT<br />
Percentage of currently married women and their husbands aware of RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS by district, Jammu & Kashmir,<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Percentage of women<br />
Percentage of men<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Aware of RTI/STI Aware of HIV/AIDS Aware of RTI/STI Aware of HIV/AIDS<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
(2.8)<br />
7.1<br />
90.0<br />
(0.0)<br />
11.1<br />
87.4<br />
32.9<br />
92.1<br />
46.0<br />
72.4<br />
14.1<br />
33.7<br />
91.4<br />
4.4<br />
10.8<br />
98.7<br />
69.1<br />
97.4<br />
0.4<br />
82.5<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
20.6<br />
(0.6)<br />
11.9<br />
46.5<br />
12.1<br />
84.2<br />
39.9<br />
45.1<br />
91.4<br />
45.6<br />
37.5<br />
1.4<br />
35.4<br />
52.1<br />
34.7<br />
98.7<br />
62.0<br />
72.3<br />
93.1<br />
72.6<br />
Poonch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
(2.5)<br />
(1.4)<br />
8.5<br />
2.9<br />
52.0<br />
10.8<br />
17.0<br />
18.4<br />
20.5<br />
7.1<br />
38.0<br />
13.0<br />
72.9<br />
17.0<br />
51.5<br />
39.2<br />
Jammu & Kashmir<br />
15.3<br />
53.8<br />
27.2<br />
68.0<br />
( ) Based on less number of cases.<br />
157
Appendix A<br />
Sampling Error Estimation<br />
The accuracy of programme indicators such as contraceptive prevalence rate, unmet need and<br />
institutional delivery, antenatal coverage etc. estimated from DLHS-RCH can be assessed in<br />
terms of stability of the estimated indicators as measured by the standard errors. Standard errors<br />
reflect only the appropriateness and suitability of sampling design adopted for RCH survey.<br />
However, the accuracy of estimated programme indicator are also affected to a great extent by<br />
non-sampling errors arising from lack of proper operationalisation and non-response cases, and<br />
is inherent in large scale surveys. The estimation producers of <strong>District</strong> <strong>Level</strong> Reproductive &<br />
Child <strong>Health</strong> survey takes into consideration design appropriateness and non-response rates.<br />
DLHS-RCH estimator of a programme indicator is design as<br />
r =<br />
∑∑∑w<br />
h j i<br />
∑∑∑w<br />
h j i<br />
hji<br />
hji<br />
y<br />
x<br />
hji<br />
hji<br />
=<br />
y<br />
x<br />
………………………………………. (1 )<br />
where the cell (h, j, i) stands for i th observational unit in j th primary sampling unit (PSU) in h th<br />
stratum, basically rural-urban areas of a district are taken as strata. W hij is the sampling weight of<br />
(h, j, i) th cell inflated by response rates. The variables y and x denote the main and the auxiliary<br />
characteristics required for computation of proportion or ratios.<br />
The equation for estimation of variance of programme indicator ( r ) is obtained after Taylor<br />
series linearisation as<br />
1<br />
var ( r ) =<br />
2<br />
x [ var ( y ) + r2 var ( x ) - 2 r cov (y, x )] ……………… …………….(2 )<br />
nh<br />
var ( y ) = ∑<br />
n −<br />
h<br />
h<br />
[ ∑∑( y )<br />
1 hji hij<br />
j<br />
i<br />
w 2<br />
–<br />
⎛<br />
⎜<br />
∑∑<br />
⎝<br />
] .………….( 3 )<br />
2<br />
w y ⎞<br />
⎟<br />
hji hji<br />
j i ⎠<br />
nh<br />
nh<br />
cov ( y , x ) = ∑ [ n − 1<br />
h<br />
h<br />
∑∑<br />
j<br />
i<br />
w<br />
2<br />
hji<br />
y<br />
hji<br />
x<br />
hji<br />
−<br />
(<br />
∑∑<br />
w<br />
y<br />
)(<br />
∑∑<br />
hji hji<br />
j i j i<br />
n h<br />
w<br />
hji<br />
x<br />
hji<br />
)<br />
] ……….( 4 )<br />
and n h is the number of sampled PSUs representing rural or urban areas of a district/state.
List of Selected Programme Variables for Sampling Errors, RCH <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Variable Estimate Base Population<br />
CPR (Any Method) Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />
Unmet Need Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />
Any ANC Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />
ANC3+ Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />
Institutional Delivery Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />
Safe Delivery Proportion Last live/still births in the past three years<br />
BCG Proportion Children age 12-23 months<br />
Measles Proportion Children age 12-23 months<br />
BO3+ Proportion Currently married women age 15-44 years<br />
with births in past three years<br />
160
Sampling errors, Jammu & Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
Number of cases<br />
Variables<br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE) Unweighted Weighted<br />
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />
Design<br />
Effect<br />
Relative<br />
Error (%)<br />
95% Conf. Interval<br />
R-1.96 R+1.96<br />
SE SE<br />
Total 0.548 0.007 10,308 10,308 1.783 1.2 0.535 0.560<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.509 0.007 7,851 7,851 1.537 1.4 0.495 0.523<br />
Urban 0.671 0.015 2,457 2,457 2.469 2.2 0.642 0.700<br />
Unmet Need (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />
Total 0.248 0.005 10,308 10,308 1.633 2.2 0.237 0.259<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.272 0.006 7,851 7,851 1.498 2.3 0.260 0.284<br />
Urban 0.170 0.011 2,457 2,457 2.068 6.4 0.149 0.191<br />
Received Any Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Total 0.876 0.008 2,276 2,596 1.587 0.9 0.860 0.892<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.856 0.009 1,708 1,965 1.386 1.1 0.838 0.874<br />
Urban 0.939 0.016 568 631 2.991 1.8 0.907 0.971<br />
Received 3+ Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Total 0.805 0.010 2,276 2,596 1.708 1.3 0.785 0.825<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.782 0.011 1,708 1,966 1.470 1.5 0.759 0.8<strong>04</strong><br />
Urban 0.879 0.022 568 630 2.968 2.5 0.835 0.922<br />
Institutional Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Total 0.705 0.012 2,276 2,596 1.763 1.7 0.682 0.728<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.681 0.013 1,708 1,965 1.510 1.9 0.656 0.707<br />
Urban 0.778 0.028 568 631 2.830 3.6 0.724 0.833<br />
Safe Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Total 0.731 0.012 2,276 2,596 1.771 1.6 0.709 0.754<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.7<strong>04</strong> 0.013 1,708 1,965 1.509 1.8 0.679 0.729<br />
Urban 0.818 0.027 568 631 3.<strong>04</strong>4 3.3 0.765 0.870<br />
Received BCG Vaccination (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />
Total 0.915 0.015 537 644 1.463 1.6 0.886 0.943<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.9<strong>04</strong> 0.017 384 461 1.259 1.9 0.871 0.937<br />
Urban 0.942 0.029 153 183 2.270 3.0 0.885 0.998<br />
Received Measles (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />
Total 0.779 0.023 537 644 1.664 3.0 0.733 0.824<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.794 0.023 384 461 1.242 2.9 0.749 0.840<br />
Urban 0.740 0.056 153 183 2.515 7.6 0.628 0.851<br />
Birth order 3+ (birth in last three years)<br />
Total 0.321 0.013 1,932 2,285 1.776 4.1 0.295 0.347<br />
<strong>Rural</strong> 0.353 0.015 1,436 1,686 1.642 4.2 0.324 0.382<br />
Urban 0.231 0.024 496 599 1.917 10.3 0.184 0.277<br />
161
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.764<br />
0.403<br />
0.279<br />
0.182<br />
0.739<br />
0.020<br />
0.030<br />
0.020<br />
0.017<br />
0.021<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
511<br />
308<br />
625<br />
551<br />
514<br />
517<br />
308<br />
625<br />
551<br />
514<br />
2.6<br />
7.4<br />
7.2<br />
9.3<br />
2.8<br />
0.725<br />
0.345<br />
0.239<br />
0.149<br />
0.698<br />
0.802<br />
0.461<br />
0.318<br />
0.215<br />
0.779<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.866<br />
0.429<br />
0.656<br />
0.916<br />
0.671<br />
0.019<br />
0.024<br />
0.021<br />
0.016<br />
0.021<br />
475<br />
534<br />
597<br />
349<br />
593<br />
475<br />
534<br />
597<br />
349<br />
589<br />
2.2<br />
5.6<br />
3.2<br />
1.7<br />
3.1<br />
0.829<br />
0.382<br />
0.615<br />
0.886<br />
0.629<br />
0.902<br />
0.477<br />
0.696<br />
0.947<br />
0.712<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.585<br />
0.227<br />
0.455<br />
0.496<br />
0.024<br />
0.018<br />
0.025<br />
0.022<br />
599<br />
824<br />
614<br />
757<br />
599<br />
823<br />
614<br />
758<br />
4.1<br />
7.9<br />
5.5<br />
4.4<br />
0.538<br />
0.192<br />
0.407<br />
0.453<br />
0.632<br />
0.263<br />
0.503<br />
0.539<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Unmet Need (Currently Married Women age 15-44)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.082<br />
0.233<br />
0.593<br />
0.659<br />
0.081<br />
0.011<br />
0.022<br />
0.018<br />
0.017<br />
0.010<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
698<br />
432<br />
881<br />
779<br />
854<br />
702<br />
433<br />
881<br />
779<br />
855<br />
13.4<br />
9.4<br />
3.0<br />
2.6<br />
12.3<br />
0.061<br />
0.190<br />
0.558<br />
0.625<br />
0.062<br />
0.102<br />
0.276<br />
0.629<br />
0.693<br />
0.101<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.079<br />
0.299<br />
0.122<br />
0.031<br />
0.124<br />
0.015<br />
0.019<br />
0.012<br />
0.008<br />
0.013<br />
475<br />
763<br />
831<br />
484<br />
826<br />
475<br />
763<br />
831<br />
484<br />
815<br />
19.0<br />
6.4<br />
9.8<br />
25.8<br />
10.5<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />
0.262<br />
0.098<br />
0.016<br />
0.099<br />
0.108<br />
0.336<br />
0.146<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />
0.149<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.312<br />
0.436<br />
0.201<br />
0.2<strong>04</strong><br />
0.019<br />
0.023<br />
0.020<br />
0.015<br />
878<br />
824<br />
614<br />
969<br />
879<br />
824<br />
614<br />
970<br />
6.1<br />
5.3<br />
10.0<br />
7.4<br />
0.274<br />
0.391<br />
0.161<br />
0.174<br />
0.349<br />
0.480<br />
0.241<br />
0.233<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Received Any Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.894<br />
0.889<br />
0.979<br />
0.565<br />
0.888<br />
0.021<br />
0.026<br />
0.007<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />
0.020<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
237<br />
136<br />
419<br />
110<br />
266<br />
244<br />
137<br />
423<br />
113<br />
276<br />
2.3<br />
2.9<br />
0.7<br />
8.5<br />
2.3<br />
0.854<br />
0.837<br />
0.964<br />
0.472<br />
0.849<br />
0.935<br />
0.941<br />
0.993<br />
0.659<br />
0.927<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.969<br />
0.737<br />
0.928<br />
0.920<br />
0.941<br />
0.030<br />
0.031<br />
0.022<br />
0.036<br />
0.019<br />
90<br />
260<br />
168<br />
65<br />
168<br />
88<br />
276<br />
176<br />
65<br />
175<br />
3.1<br />
4.2<br />
2.4<br />
3.9<br />
2.0<br />
0.910<br />
0.676<br />
0.884<br />
0.849<br />
0.9<strong>04</strong><br />
1.028<br />
0.797<br />
0.972<br />
0.991<br />
0.977<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.548<br />
0.642<br />
0.870<br />
0.896<br />
0.055<br />
0.056<br />
0.055<br />
0.031<br />
112<br />
98<br />
47<br />
100<br />
93<br />
87<br />
49<br />
96<br />
10.0<br />
8.7<br />
6.3<br />
3.5<br />
0.440<br />
0.532<br />
0.761<br />
0.835<br />
0.656<br />
0.753<br />
0.979<br />
0.956<br />
162
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Received 3+ Antenatal Check up (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.842<br />
0.885<br />
0.976<br />
0.527<br />
0.829<br />
0.025<br />
0.027<br />
0.008<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />
0.025<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
237<br />
136<br />
419<br />
110<br />
266<br />
244<br />
137<br />
423<br />
112<br />
276<br />
3.0<br />
3.1<br />
0.8<br />
9.1<br />
3.0<br />
0.793<br />
0.832<br />
0.961<br />
0.433<br />
0.780<br />
0.891<br />
0.937<br />
0.992<br />
0.621<br />
0.877<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.958<br />
0.394<br />
0.912<br />
0.896<br />
0.918<br />
0.032<br />
0.034<br />
0.024<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />
0.022<br />
90<br />
260<br />
168<br />
65<br />
168<br />
88<br />
276<br />
176<br />
66<br />
175<br />
3.3<br />
8.6<br />
2.6<br />
4.5<br />
2.4<br />
0.896<br />
0.328<br />
0.864<br />
0.818<br />
0.874<br />
1.020<br />
0.460<br />
0.959<br />
0.973<br />
0.962<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.337<br />
0.538<br />
0.668<br />
0.817<br />
0.051<br />
0.060<br />
0.086<br />
0.039<br />
112<br />
98<br />
47<br />
100<br />
93<br />
87<br />
49<br />
96<br />
15.1<br />
11.2<br />
12.9<br />
4.8<br />
0.236<br />
0.421<br />
0.499<br />
0.740<br />
0.437<br />
0.655<br />
0.838<br />
0.894<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Institutional Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.813<br />
0.929<br />
0.910<br />
0.340<br />
0.727<br />
0.026<br />
0.022<br />
0.019<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>6<br />
0.030<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
237<br />
136<br />
419<br />
110<br />
266<br />
243<br />
138<br />
423<br />
112<br />
276<br />
3.2<br />
2.4<br />
2.1<br />
13.5<br />
4.1<br />
0.762<br />
0.887<br />
0.874<br />
0.249<br />
0.669<br />
0.863<br />
0.972<br />
0.946<br />
0.430<br />
0.786<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.946<br />
0.268<br />
0.630<br />
0.896<br />
0.645<br />
0.023<br />
0.030<br />
0.039<br />
0.039<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />
90<br />
260<br />
168<br />
65<br />
168<br />
88<br />
275<br />
176<br />
66<br />
176<br />
2.4<br />
11.2<br />
6.2<br />
4.4<br />
6.2<br />
0.901<br />
0.208<br />
0.553<br />
0.818<br />
0.567<br />
0.991<br />
0.327<br />
0.707<br />
0.973<br />
0.723<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.232<br />
0.302<br />
0.725<br />
0.501<br />
0.051<br />
0.058<br />
0.077<br />
0.053<br />
112<br />
98<br />
47<br />
100<br />
94<br />
86<br />
48<br />
95<br />
22.0<br />
19.2<br />
10.6<br />
10.6<br />
0.132<br />
0.188<br />
0.575<br />
0.397<br />
0.332<br />
0.416<br />
0.876<br />
0.606<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Safe Delivery (last live/still birth of past 3 years)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.822<br />
0.929<br />
0.910<br />
0.523<br />
0.758<br />
0.026<br />
0.022<br />
0.019<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />
0.029<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
237<br />
136<br />
419<br />
110<br />
266<br />
244<br />
138<br />
423<br />
112<br />
276<br />
3.2<br />
2.4<br />
2.1<br />
9.2<br />
3.8<br />
0.772<br />
0.887<br />
0.874<br />
0.428<br />
0.702<br />
0.872<br />
0.972<br />
0.946<br />
0.617<br />
0.814<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.946<br />
0.299<br />
0.649<br />
0.936<br />
0.664<br />
0.023<br />
0.032<br />
0.039<br />
0.028<br />
0.039<br />
90<br />
260<br />
168<br />
65<br />
168<br />
88<br />
275<br />
175<br />
66<br />
176<br />
2.4<br />
10.7<br />
6.0<br />
3.0<br />
5.9<br />
0.901<br />
0.237<br />
0.572<br />
0.880<br />
0.587<br />
0.991<br />
0.361<br />
0.725<br />
0.991<br />
0.740<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.524<br />
0.350<br />
0.752<br />
0.595<br />
0.054<br />
0.059<br />
0.075<br />
0.052<br />
112<br />
98<br />
47<br />
100<br />
93<br />
86<br />
49<br />
96<br />
10.3<br />
16.9<br />
10.0<br />
8.7<br />
0.417<br />
0.235<br />
0.606<br />
0.494<br />
0.630<br />
0.466<br />
0.899<br />
0.697<br />
163
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Received BCG Vaccination (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
1.000<br />
0.897<br />
0.972<br />
0.917<br />
0.879<br />
0.000<br />
0.068<br />
0.020<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>6<br />
0.035<br />
34<br />
25<br />
73<br />
27<br />
86<br />
35<br />
26<br />
78<br />
27<br />
87<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
0.0<br />
7.6<br />
2.0<br />
5.0<br />
4.0<br />
1.000<br />
0.763<br />
0.933<br />
0.827<br />
0.810<br />
1.000<br />
1.031<br />
1.011<br />
1.008<br />
0.947<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
-<br />
0.938<br />
0.943<br />
-<br />
0.935<br />
-<br />
0.038<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>0<br />
-<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />
-<br />
64<br />
35<br />
-<br />
35<br />
-<br />
67<br />
37<br />
-<br />
33<br />
-<br />
4.1<br />
4.3<br />
-<br />
5.3<br />
-<br />
0.863<br />
0.864<br />
-<br />
0.839<br />
-<br />
1.014<br />
1.023<br />
-<br />
1.032<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.489<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.975<br />
- Standard Error not shown due to fewer cases<br />
0.105<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.025<br />
27<br />
-<br />
-<br />
35<br />
21<br />
-<br />
-<br />
35<br />
21.4<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2.6<br />
0.283<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.926<br />
0.694<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1.024<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
Received Measles (last and last but one living children, age 12-23 months)<br />
Anantanag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.892<br />
0.742<br />
0.950<br />
0.852<br />
0.745<br />
0.052<br />
0.086<br />
0.025<br />
0.058<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
34<br />
25<br />
73<br />
27<br />
86<br />
35<br />
26<br />
78<br />
27<br />
87<br />
5.8<br />
11.6<br />
2.7<br />
6.7<br />
6.3<br />
0.790<br />
0.572<br />
0.900<br />
0.739<br />
0.652<br />
0.994<br />
0.911<br />
1.000<br />
0.965<br />
0.837<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
-<br />
0.845<br />
0.784<br />
-<br />
0.761<br />
-<br />
0.054<br />
0.075<br />
-<br />
0.083<br />
-<br />
64<br />
35<br />
-<br />
35<br />
-<br />
67<br />
37<br />
-<br />
33<br />
-<br />
6.4<br />
9.6<br />
-<br />
10.9<br />
-<br />
0.739<br />
0.636<br />
-<br />
0.598<br />
-<br />
0.951<br />
0.931<br />
-<br />
0.924<br />
Punch<br />
Rajauri<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.293<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.554<br />
- Standard Error not shown due to fewer cases<br />
0.089<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.079<br />
27<br />
-<br />
-<br />
35<br />
21<br />
-<br />
-<br />
35<br />
30.3<br />
-<br />
-<br />
14.3<br />
0.118<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.399<br />
0.467<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.710<br />
Sampling errors, Jammu and Kashmir, <strong>2002</strong>-<strong>04</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Estimate<br />
(R)<br />
Birth order 3+ (birth in last three years)<br />
Anantnag<br />
Badgam<br />
Baramula<br />
Doda<br />
Jammu<br />
0.454<br />
0.261<br />
0.561<br />
0.226<br />
0.185<br />
Sampling<br />
error (SE)<br />
0.038<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>2<br />
0.030<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>8<br />
0.026<br />
Number of cases Relative 95% Conf. Interval<br />
Unweighted Weighted Error (%) R-1.96 SE R+1.96 SE<br />
188<br />
114<br />
314<br />
79<br />
263<br />
193<br />
113<br />
314<br />
80<br />
271<br />
8.4<br />
16.1<br />
5.3<br />
21.2<br />
14.1<br />
0.380<br />
0.179<br />
0.502<br />
0.131<br />
0.134<br />
0.527<br />
0.343<br />
0.620<br />
0.321<br />
0.236<br />
Kargil<br />
Kathua<br />
Kupwara<br />
Leh (Ladakh)<br />
Pulwama<br />
0.406<br />
0.340<br />
0.285<br />
0.428<br />
0.291<br />
0.074<br />
0.032<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>1<br />
0.082<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>3<br />
62<br />
271<br />
137<br />
40<br />
136<br />
64<br />
288<br />
145<br />
43<br />
141<br />
18.2<br />
9.4<br />
14.4<br />
19.2<br />
14.8<br />
0.261<br />
0.278<br />
0.2<strong>04</strong><br />
0.268<br />
0.206<br />
0.550<br />
0.403<br />
0.365<br />
0.589<br />
0.375<br />
Punch<br />
Rajori<br />
Srinagar<br />
Udhampur<br />
0.068<br />
0.188<br />
0.276<br />
0.330<br />
0.024<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>7<br />
0.072<br />
0.<strong>04</strong>9<br />
95<br />
78<br />
58<br />
97<br />
77<br />
71<br />
64<br />
93<br />
35.3<br />
25.0<br />
26.1<br />
14.8<br />
0.022<br />
0.096<br />
0.135<br />
0.233<br />
0.115<br />
0.280<br />
0.417<br />
0.427<br />
164
APPENDIX B<br />
DLHS-RCH STAFF, JAMMU & KASHMIR<br />
Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi<br />
Project Director<br />
Dr. O.P.Vig<br />
Mr. M.A. Khan<br />
Mr. Mr. Des Raj<br />
Mr. Joginder Paul<br />
Mr. Nashir Malik<br />
Mr. Muneer Malik<br />
Mr. Mohd. Qasim<br />
Mr. Ravi Kumar<br />
Mr. Irshad Rashid<br />
Mr. Iftikar Rashid<br />
Mr. Mohd. Ramzan<br />
Mr. Mohd. Bilkan Wani<br />
Mr. Muhhamad Razab<br />
Mr. Sayeed Zahoor<br />
Mr. Yesh Paul<br />
Mr. Mustaq Ahmad<br />
Mr. Gulshan Akhtar<br />
Mr. Dilshad Akhtar<br />
Miss Farhat Khan<br />
Mr. Sanjay Kumar<br />
Mr. Jagdish Chander<br />
Mr. Mohd. Qasim<br />
Mr. A. R. Sofi<br />
Mr. Mustaq Ahmad<br />
Miss. Shama Devi<br />
Mr. Javeed Ahmad War<br />
Mr. A. M. Rather<br />
Project Coordinators<br />
Field Mangers<br />
Field Officers<br />
Team Supervisors<br />
Field Editors<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Investigators<br />
Interviewers<br />
<strong>Household</strong> listing Supervisors<br />
<strong>Household</strong> Listers and Mappers<br />
Office Editors<br />
Data Entry Operators<br />
Mr. G.R. Malik<br />
Mr. Tilak Raj<br />
Mr. Nasir Malik<br />
Mr. Omar Rasool<br />
Mr. Aijaz Ahmad<br />
Mr. Omar Malik<br />
Mr. Yaseen<br />
Mr. Khalid Malik<br />
Mr. Mehraj Khalid<br />
Mr. Khalid Abbas<br />
Mr. Ab Qayoom Mir<br />
Miss. Shakeela Bano<br />
Miss. Shanti Devi<br />
Miss. Kanta<br />
Miss. Bimla Devi<br />
Miss Rajani Devi<br />
Miss. Indu Sharma<br />
Miss Raj Rani<br />
Mr. M. R. Malik<br />
Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad<br />
Mr. Mohd. Hussain<br />
Mr. Ajjaz Ahmad<br />
Mr. A.R. Teli<br />
Miss. Fahmeeda Akhtar<br />
Mr. Mohd. Yaseen<br />
Mr. Mehraj Khalid
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai<br />
Project Coordinators<br />
Senior Research Officers<br />
Mr. M. Nagavara Prasad<br />
Mr. Akash N. Wankhede<br />
Mr. Uttam J Sonkamble<br />
Mr. Ashok Kumar<br />
Ms. Jigna Thacker<br />
Ms. Baishali Goswami<br />
Ms. Sancheeta Ghosh<br />
Ms. Kirti Mishra<br />
Ms. Sucharita Pujari<br />
Ms. Preeti Chauhan<br />
Mrs. Santhi N.S.<br />
Ms. Sanjeeta Gupta<br />
Ms. Reshmi R.S.<br />
Ms. Rinki Saha<br />
Mr. Arnendu Kumar Jha<br />
Mr. Atanu Ghosh<br />
Mr. Manas Pradhan<br />
Research Officers<br />
Dr. F. Ram<br />
Dr. B. Paswan<br />
Dr. L. Ladu Singh<br />
Mr. Rajiv Ranjan<br />
Mr. K. C. Lakhara<br />
Mr. Nizamuddin Khan<br />
Mr. Suhas Narkhede<br />
Mr. Pramod Kumar Gupta<br />
Mr. Bipul Hazarika<br />
Dr. Manoj Alagarajan<br />
Dr. Kalyan Saha<br />
Dr. N Anbazhaham<br />
Dr. Saithya Susaman<br />
Mr. Manoj Kumar<br />
Mr. Dibya L Mohanta<br />
Mr. Mohan Tiwari<br />
Mr. Battala Madhusudana<br />
Mr. Bardanwala S.I.<br />
Mr. Jiten Kumar Singh<br />
Mr. Manoranjan Barik<br />
Mr. Laxmi Prasad Sonwani<br />
Mr. Nimakwala M. I.<br />
Accounts and Administrative staff<br />
Mr. Sunil Adavede (Sr. Accountant)<br />
Mr. Jeba Kumar (Data Entry Operator)<br />
Ms. Pratima P. Zore (Data Entry Operator)<br />
Ms. Preeti S. Kharat (Data Entry Operator)<br />
Ms. Sayali Shivalkar (Data Entry Operator)<br />
Mrs. Seema V. Zagade (Office Assistant)<br />
Mrs. Deepa J. Nair (Office Assistant)<br />
Mr. Chandra D. Singh (Office Boy)<br />
Mr. Ravindra P. Gawade (Office Boy)<br />
Mr. Sanjay P. Kadam (Office Boy)<br />
166
LIST OF CONTRIBUTERS<br />
Dr. O.P. Vig , Project Director, DLHS-RCH Jammu & Kashmir and General Secretary, Society<br />
for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />
Mr. Ummed Singh, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />
Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities,<br />
New Delhi.<br />
Mr. B.K. Yadav, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />
Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />
Mr. Ravikesh, Research Associate, Society for Applied Research in Humanities, New Delhi.<br />
Dr. F. Ram, Professor & Head, Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for<br />
Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />
Dr. B. Paswan, Reader, Department of Population Policy and Programme, International Institute<br />
for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />
Dr. L. Ladu Singh, Professor & Head, Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics,<br />
International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />
Mr. Akash Wankhede, Research Officer, DLHS-RCH, International Institute for Population<br />
Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />
Mr. Ananta Basudev Sahu, Research Officer, DLHS-RCH, International Institute for Population<br />
Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088.<br />
167
Appendix – C<br />
Insert bilingual questionnaire<br />
<strong>Household</strong>s, Women, Husbands and Village
NOTES