Footpath degradation of the Malvern Hills - Malvern Hills Conservators
Footpath degradation of the Malvern Hills - Malvern Hills Conservators Footpath degradation of the Malvern Hills - Malvern Hills Conservators
Stephen Britnell Footpath degradation of the Malvern Hills Figure 7. Techniques to measure slope angle and path angle 3.4 Method of dry sieving Wet soil samples are transferred from the sample bags into pre-weighed containers and dried in the open air. Due to the drying processes the soil particles cement together and must be broken down into individual particles, this process is completed using a pestle and mortar. Prior to sieving the sample is weighed using a top ban balance accurate to 1/100 th of a gram, and the weight of the container subtracted to give the total weight of the sample. The sample is then sieved mechanically for ten minutes in a set of sieves ranging from –3phi to >4phi. The material from each phi size is then placed into a pre-weighted container and weighed, and the weight of the container subtracted to give the actual weight of the sample. The % of total weight for each phi size is then calculated using the following equation: % Weight = Weight of phi sample Total sample weight Cumulative % is found by simply adding up the % weight of each phi size, from small (>4phi) to large (-3phi). The % weight is then plotted against phi size to give a particle size distribution curve, which shows the degree to which the soil is made up of clay, silt, sand, and gravel. 24
Stephen Britnell Footpath degradation of the Malvern Hills 4. Results 4.1 Footpath classification – see fig 8 p35 4.2 Recreational variable Figure 9. - Footpath popularity 30 25 20 Count in 1hr 15 Horses Mountain bikes People 10 5 0 1. Worcs Beacon 2. Peserverence 3. Pinnacle Hill 4. Swinyard Hill 5. End Hill 6. North Hill 7. St Ann's Knoll 8. British camp res 9. Clutters cave 10. Hangman's Hill 11. Ladies Drive 4.3 Environmental variables 4.3.1 Soil structure Table 3. – Soil composition Path % coarse / medium % medium / % fine gravel / % Medium % fine sand % silt/clay Number gravel fine gravel coarse sand sand 1 54.89 8.48 11.29 12.77 8.57 3.86 5 42.4 6.07 13.94 18.28 12.23 6.69 7 47.25 15.67 19.16 11.39 5.34 1.86 8 10.55 7.99 20.17 29.51 15.27 13.54 25
- Page 1 and 2: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 3 and 4: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 5 and 6: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 7 and 8: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 9 and 10: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 11 and 12: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 13 and 14: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 15 and 16: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 17 and 18: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 19 and 20: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 21 and 22: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 23: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 27 and 28: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 29 and 30: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 31 and 32: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 33 and 34: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 35 and 36: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 37 and 38: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 39 and 40: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 41 and 42: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 43 and 44: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
- Page 45: Stephen Britnell Footpath degradati
Stephen Britnell<br />
<strong>Footpath</strong> <strong>degradation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Malvern</strong> <strong>Hills</strong><br />
Figure 7. Techniques to measure slope angle and path angle<br />
3.4 Method <strong>of</strong> dry sieving<br />
Wet soil samples are transferred from <strong>the</strong> sample bags into pre-weighed containers<br />
and dried in <strong>the</strong> open air. Due to <strong>the</strong> drying processes <strong>the</strong> soil particles cement toge<strong>the</strong>r and<br />
must be broken down into individual particles, this process is completed using a pestle and<br />
mortar. Prior to sieving <strong>the</strong> sample is weighed using a top ban balance accurate to 1/100 th <strong>of</strong><br />
a gram, and <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> container subtracted to give <strong>the</strong> total weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample. The<br />
sample is <strong>the</strong>n sieved mechanically for ten minutes in a set <strong>of</strong> sieves ranging from –3phi to<br />
>4phi. The material from each phi size is <strong>the</strong>n placed into a pre-weighted container and<br />
weighed, and <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> container subtracted to give <strong>the</strong> actual weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />
The % <strong>of</strong> total weight for each phi size is <strong>the</strong>n calculated using <strong>the</strong> following equation:<br />
% Weight = Weight <strong>of</strong> phi sample<br />
Total sample weight<br />
Cumulative % is found by simply adding up <strong>the</strong> % weight <strong>of</strong> each phi size, from small (>4phi)<br />
to large (-3phi). The % weight is <strong>the</strong>n plotted against phi size to give a particle size distribution<br />
curve, which shows <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> soil is made up <strong>of</strong> clay, silt, sand, and gravel.<br />
24