Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
2011-2012 AEMR Table 5.2 – Maintenance Activities on Previously Rehabilitated Land Nature of Treatment Area Treated (ha) Report Period Next Period Comment/Control Strategies/Treatment Detail Additional erosion control works (drains re-contouring, rock protection) 0 As required For the next reporting period WCPL will be developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation program. Soil Treatment (detail – fertiliser, lime, gypsum etc) Treatment/ Management (detail – grazing, cropping, slashing etc) Re-seeding/ Replanting (detail – species density, season etc) Repairs to subsidence induced cracking 0 0 0 0 As required As required As required As required For the next reporting period WCPL will be developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation program. For the next reporting period WCPL will be developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation program. For the next reporting period WCPL will be developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation program. Subsidence cracking repaired along site internal access roads. Adversely Affected by Weeds (detail – type and treatment) 0 As required See Section 3.8 for to weed control measures on other WCPL owned land Feral animal control (detail – additional fencing, trapping, baiting etc) 0 As required While no work is proposed directly on rehabilitated areas, work will be conducted on other WCPL owned land. Refer to Section 3.8. 5.1 Rehabilitation of Disturbed Land 5.1.1 Open Cut Landform reshaping consists of re-contouring overburden dumps to the designed shape for final rehabilitation. The bulk shaping of overburden is undertaken using bulldozers. Reshaping results in a stable landform incorporating slopes and drainage which blend in with the surrounding natural topography. Slope stability is integral to rehabilitation design and the objective during rehabilitation planning is to design all slopes to a gradient of ten degrees or less. Slopes steeper than ten degrees may be necessary in some locations to ensure rehabilitation merges seamlessly with adjacent undisturbed land. Once bulk reshaping is completed, the landform is deep-ripped to approximately 300mm, and then the final trim and rock raking are undertaken. The ripping loosens up any near surface strata within the landform that have been compacted during placement, aiding root penetration during vegetation establishment. The final trim smooths out any wash-outs, rough edges, temporary access tracks, local steep topography and prepares the surface for revegetation. Rock-raking removes exposed surface rock greater than 200 mm in diameter. This raking is usually done along the contour, leaving a textured surface that assists with erosion minimisation until vegetation can be established. Ameliorants, if required, are applied to the trimmed overburden surface prior to topsoil spreading. Topsoil stripped ahead of mining will be applied to the reshaped surface in an even layer generally not less than 100mm. Topsoil is placed using rear dump haul trucks, or ejector trucks, and spread with dozers or graders. Once spread, the topsoil surface will be disc or chisel cultivated to create a textured surface which assists in trapping surface runoff, provides seed entrapments and creates microclimates favourable for seed germination. Where biosolids are used, cultivation also integrates the topdressing material, which is a requirement of the EPA biosolids handling guidelines. Following surface preparation, vegetation establishment across the rehabilitated area is commenced. The aim of revegetation is to minimise erosion and facilitate the development of the postmining land-use, be it agricultural production or habitat/ecosystem enhancement. Page 86
2011-2012 AEMR 5.1.1.1 Rehabilitation Performance Existing rehabilitated areas include the Whynot, Low-wall and Ridge Dump areas, RL160 Dump, Charlies Hole, Wombat Hill, and Radio Shack in the current Open Cut plus older rehabilitation from previous Open Cuts. engineered solutions to cap the weak tailings surface. The design has considered the strength of the current crust (verified through Shear Vane Testing), the equipment to be used and the capping material to determine the reinforcement and the placement method required to ensure the safety of this operation. During the previous reporting period of 2010-2011, rehabilitated areas within the Open Cut were reliant on the completion of overburden dumps, particularly in the Rug/ Ridge dump area. Due to delays in overburden removal from the Homestead Pit (which was being placed on the Rug/ Ridge dump), no significant dump areas were available for reshaping, and no open cut rehabilitation was completed during the period of 2010-2011. Further rehabilitation planned for the 2011-2012 was primarily focused on the RL 160 Dump. At the time of reporting, 40 ha of final reshaped landform had been completed. Topsoiling and seeding of the area is scheduled to commence and be completed in September 2012. The planned rehabilitation for next reporting period is 40 ha. This work is planned for the Rug/ Ridge Dump. All disused tailings dams are rehabilitated with the exception of the North East Tailings Dam, which is currently being capped for rehabilitation (see Section 5.1.1.2). 5.1.1.2 North East Tailings Dam The rehabilitation of the area known as the North East Tailings Dam (NETD) has been established as a stand alone project within Peabody’s Wambo Coal Operation. Initial works commenced at the NETD during the 2008/2009 AEMR reporting period. The dam, which was discontinued as an active disposal site in 2004 following Department Approval under Section 127, has been the subject of a number of studies to identify a safe and viable method of capping the relatively weak surface. WCPL have been working together with Australian Tailings Consultants to develop a capping strategy utilising reinforced geogrid and controlled layers of coarse reject and overburden placed by specialist low ground pressure equipment. NETD rehabilitation works using low press ground equipment Placement of the initial rejects layer has continued with additional small dozers sourced. Progress has been slow due to the weak surface with the crust rewetting as the equipment traverses, however a repeatable process has now been demonstrated and productivity is improving. During the last reporting period, heavy rain in early June 2011 caused major ponds to form on the dam surface which suspended work activity. Pumping continued throughout the month with the majority of water removed. As a result of the water on the surface no placement of fabric or rejects occurred during the month. Pumping efforts were successful with access regained to the dam surface mid month with rejects placement and geo grid placement resuming in early July 2011. The scope of the NETD capping project is to rehabilitate the 1220m long by 200m wide decommissioned tailings storage facility. WCPL have investigated and evaluated the capping method utilising purpose built low ground pressure equipment, in conjunction with Geotextile reinforcement. Extensive design works have been undertaken to develop the concept and provide Wet weather June 15 2011 Page 87
- Page 47 and 48: 2011-2012 AEMR The purpose of the e
- Page 49 and 50: SUMP SUMP N19 SW46 SW45 Hunter Rive
- Page 51 and 52: 2011-2012 AEMR Figure 3.4 - 2010-20
- Page 53 and 54: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.2.1.2 Penalty Infr
- Page 55 and 56: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.2.2.3 PM 10 Four r
- Page 57 and 58: 2011-2012 AEMR Particulate Matter A
- Page 59 and 60: 2011-2012 AEMR Assessment criterion
- Page 61 and 62: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.4 Surface Water 3.
- Page 63 and 64: 2011-2012 AEMR Variations in TSS ob
- Page 65 and 66: 2011-2012 AEMR replacement program
- Page 67 and 68: 2011-2012 AEMR Table 3.2 - Groundwa
- Page 69 and 70: 2011-2012 AEMR Figure 3.13a - Groun
- Page 71 and 72: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.6 Contaminated Lan
- Page 73 and 74: 2011-2012 AEMR prior to undermining
- Page 75 and 76: SUMP SUMP V10-A2 NORTH WAMBO CREEK
- Page 77 and 78: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.8 Weeds 3.8.1 Envi
- Page 79 and 80: 2011-2012 AEMR WCPL’s development
- Page 81 and 82: 2011-2012 AEMR Day L Aeq(15 minute)
- Page 83 and 84: 2011-2012 AEMR Disturbance (L A1,1m
- Page 85 and 86: 2011-2012 AEMR Stakeholders (WACS)
- Page 87 and 88: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.13.2 European Heri
- Page 89 and 90: 2011-2012 AEMR 3.15 Bushfire Manage
- Page 91 and 92: 2011-2012 AEMR non-sensitive enviro
- Page 93 and 94: 2011-2012 AEMR Table 4.1 - WCPL Emp
- Page 95 and 96: 2011-2012 AEMR 4.3 Community Liaiso
- Page 97: 2011-2012 AEMR 5.0 Rehabilitation T
- Page 101 and 102: 2011-2012 AEMR 5.1.3 NWC Diversion
- Page 103 and 104: 2011-2012 AEMR Riparian EFA Riparia
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix 1 Rail Haulage Records
- Page 107 and 108: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 109 and 110: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 111 and 112: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 113 and 114: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 115 and 116: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 117 and 118: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 119 and 120: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 121 and 122: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 123 and 124: Appendix 2A Meteorological Data
- Page 125 and 126: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix 2B Air Monitoring Data
- Page 129 and 130: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 D
- Page 131 and 132: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 133 and 134: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 135 and 136: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 137 and 138: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 D
- Page 139 and 140: Appendix 2C Surface Water Monitorin
- Page 141 and 142: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 143 and 144: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 145 and 146: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 147 and 148: Annual Environmental Management Rep
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />
Table 5.2 – Maintenance Activities on Previously Rehabilitated Land<br />
Nature of Treatment<br />
Area Treated (ha)<br />
Report<br />
Period<br />
Next<br />
Period<br />
Comment/Control Strategies/Treatment<br />
Detail<br />
Additional erosion control<br />
works (drains re-contouring, rock<br />
protection)<br />
0<br />
As<br />
required<br />
For the next reporting period WCPL will be<br />
developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation<br />
program.<br />
Soil Treatment (detail – fertiliser,<br />
lime, gypsum etc)<br />
Treatment/ Management (detail<br />
– grazing, cropping, slashing etc)<br />
Re-seeding/ Replanting (detail –<br />
species density, season etc)<br />
Repairs to subsidence induced<br />
cracking<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
As<br />
required<br />
As<br />
required<br />
As<br />
required<br />
As<br />
required<br />
For the next reporting period WCPL will be<br />
developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation<br />
program.<br />
For the next reporting period WCPL will be<br />
developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation<br />
program.<br />
For the next reporting period WCPL will be<br />
developing an annual maintenance rehabilitation<br />
program.<br />
Subsidence cracking repaired along site internal<br />
access roads.<br />
Adversely Affected by Weeds<br />
(detail – type and treatment)<br />
0<br />
As<br />
required<br />
See Section 3.8 for to weed control measures on<br />
other WCPL owned land<br />
Feral animal control (detail –<br />
additional fencing, trapping,<br />
baiting etc)<br />
0<br />
As<br />
required<br />
While no work is proposed directly on rehabilitated<br />
areas, work will be conducted on other WCPL<br />
owned land. Refer to Section 3.8.<br />
5.1 Rehabilitation of Disturbed<br />
Land<br />
5.1.1 Open Cut<br />
Landform reshaping consists of re-contouring<br />
overburden dumps to the designed shape for final<br />
rehabilitation. The bulk shaping of overburden is<br />
undertaken using bulldozers. Reshaping results in<br />
a stable landform incorporating slopes and drainage<br />
which blend in with the surrounding natural<br />
topography. Slope stability is integral to<br />
rehabilitation design and the objective during<br />
rehabilitation planning is to design all slopes to a<br />
gradient of ten degrees or less. Slopes steeper than<br />
ten degrees may be necessary in some locations to<br />
ensure rehabilitation merges seamlessly with<br />
adjacent undisturbed land.<br />
Once bulk reshaping is completed, the landform is<br />
deep-ripped to approximately 300mm, and then the<br />
final trim and rock raking are undertaken. The<br />
ripping loosens up any near surface strata within the<br />
landform that have been compacted during<br />
placement, aiding root penetration during vegetation<br />
establishment.<br />
The final trim smooths out any wash-outs, rough<br />
edges, temporary access tracks, local steep<br />
topography and prepares the surface for<br />
revegetation. Rock-raking removes exposed<br />
surface rock greater than 200 mm in diameter. This<br />
raking is usually done along the contour, leaving a<br />
textured surface that assists with erosion<br />
minimisation until vegetation can be established.<br />
Ameliorants, if required, are applied to the trimmed<br />
overburden surface prior to topsoil spreading.<br />
Topsoil stripped ahead of mining will be applied to<br />
the reshaped surface in an even layer generally not<br />
less than 100mm. Topsoil is placed using rear<br />
dump haul trucks, or ejector trucks, and spread with<br />
dozers or graders. Once spread, the topsoil surface<br />
will be disc or chisel cultivated to create a textured<br />
surface which assists in trapping surface runoff,<br />
provides seed entrapments and creates<br />
microclimates favourable for seed germination.<br />
Where biosolids are used, cultivation also integrates<br />
the topdressing material, which is a requirement of<br />
the EPA biosolids handling guidelines.<br />
Following surface preparation, vegetation<br />
establishment across the rehabilitated area is<br />
commenced. The aim of revegetation is to minimise<br />
erosion and facilitate the development of the postmining<br />
land-use, be it agricultural production or<br />
habitat/ecosystem enhancement.<br />
Page 86