Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />
non-sensitive environment and/or contained area<br />
and saline water discharge.<br />
Major (Category 3)<br />
Incidents categorised as significant are those that<br />
have actual or potential severe damage to the<br />
environment with the potential to result in<br />
environmental liability, regulatory intervention and/or<br />
significant community concern or actual damage<br />
that will require significant remediation/<br />
management.<br />
3.20.2 Environmental Performance<br />
During the reporting period WCPL recorded a total<br />
of eleven environmental incidents, of which there<br />
were eight Category 1 incidents and three Category<br />
2 incidents (Appendix 3). The Category 1 incidents<br />
included small hydrocarbon spills contained within<br />
the open cut pit, excessive dust generation, and<br />
unapproved works commencing on <strong>Wambo</strong> owned<br />
land.<br />
In accordance with WCPL’s statutory obligations,<br />
regulatory authorities were informed of four<br />
incidents in relation to dam overflow, blasting, dam<br />
seepages and elevated dust results A summary of<br />
the incidents and reports are provided below.<br />
WCPL received a Penalty Infringement Notice (PIN)<br />
on the 12 June <strong>2012</strong> as a result from a site<br />
inspection on the 4 May <strong>2012</strong> by the DP&I. The PIN<br />
was in relation to excessive wheel generated dust<br />
witnessed during the site inspection.<br />
Elevated Dust Result – 20 September <strong>2011</strong><br />
As reported to Scott Brooks via telephone on Friday<br />
23 September <strong>2011</strong>, <strong>Wambo</strong> recorded a PM10 level<br />
of 82.5ug/m 3 for the 24 hour period on 20<br />
September <strong>2011</strong> (midnight to midnight) at<br />
monitoring location PM02. The day was extremely<br />
windy, with upwind monitors (PM03 and PM04)<br />
indicating regional dust contributions of between<br />
26.4 – 27.3 ug/m 3 .<br />
A contributor to the elevated dust result was the<br />
North <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek Diversion Stage 3 (NWCD)<br />
project. The dust risk from the project was assessed<br />
on the morning of the incident and operations were<br />
halted for the day. The only exception was the water<br />
cart, which was kept on a watering circuit until late<br />
in the afternoon when wind speed had subsided.<br />
However, the strong wind gusts caused difficulties<br />
with the refilling of the water cart, increasing refill<br />
time and decreasing the ground watering capacity.<br />
See Appendix 3 for further information.<br />
South <strong>Wambo</strong> Dam Overflow 5 March <strong>2012</strong><br />
WCPL received a written request by the<br />
Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) dated 29<br />
March <strong>2012</strong>, requesting a written report on the mine<br />
water discharge event that occurred on land owned<br />
on the 5 March <strong>2012</strong>. The summary of the<br />
investigation and response to the EPA is provide<br />
below.<br />
A discharge to ground when mine water overflowed<br />
from South <strong>Wambo</strong> Dam (the dam) via the dam<br />
spillway. The discharge was first noticed on the<br />
morning of Monday 05 March <strong>2012</strong>, and was halted<br />
by 10am the same day. During a previous<br />
inspection of the dam at 2pm on Saturday 03 March<br />
<strong>2012</strong>, it was noted that the dam water level was<br />
high, but did not appear to be in any risk of<br />
overflowing. The discharge commenced at some<br />
point after the inspection on the 03 March <strong>2012</strong>,<br />
giving a maximum discharge duration of 44 hours.<br />
The dam water level was already high due to high<br />
rainfall, and operational pumping of mine water to<br />
the dam, in the month leading up to the discharge.<br />
The dam has a water level sensor, which sends an<br />
alarm when water level reaches 1m below the dam<br />
spillway level. An inspection in the last week of<br />
February noted a discrepancy between the actual<br />
dam water level and the level being reported by the<br />
water level sensor. At this time a new sensor was<br />
ordered, and pumping to the dam was halted.<br />
Despite this, heavy rain over the weekend of 03-04<br />
March caused the water level to over top the<br />
spillway.<br />
The following measures have been completed or to<br />
prevent a recurrence of the discharge incident,<br />
including a replacement probe for the dam water<br />
level sensor, increased inspection schedules for the<br />
dam has been revised to ensure weekly verification<br />
of the remotely monitored dam water level,<br />
earthworks to reinstate the spillway in accordance<br />
with the dam design, following the temporary works<br />
completed to halt the discharge and environmental<br />
training package to the workforce.<br />
Open Cut Blast 30 March <strong>2012</strong><br />
WCPL received written request on the 2 April <strong>2012</strong><br />
by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA)<br />
regarding complaints received by the EPA<br />
Environment Line on 30 March <strong>2012</strong> alleging, that<br />
around 3.35pm a large orange plume from a blast<br />
was seen moving towards homes near Jerry Plains.<br />
The complainants also alleged that there was<br />
excessive vibration/overpressure from the blast. The<br />
summary of the investigation and response to the<br />
EPA is provide below.<br />
Two overburden shots were fired in the <strong>Wambo</strong><br />
Open Cut at 15:36 (shot M16WWA2) and 15:40<br />
(shot M9WWD2) on Friday 30 March <strong>2012</strong>. The two<br />
shots on 30 March <strong>2012</strong> generated ground vibration<br />
and overpressure. The blast monitoring results for<br />
the ground vibration and overpressure from these<br />
shots, as monitored at <strong>Wambo</strong> blast monitoring<br />
sites, were well within WCPL blasting criteria.<br />
The shots generated airborne dust and visible NOx<br />
fumes. Both shots were observed and<br />
photographed by WCPL environmental staff, and<br />
recorded on video by Downer EDI Mining (<strong>Wambo</strong><br />
Page 79