01.11.2014 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />

Australian Standard AS4282 (INT) 1995 – Control of<br />

Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting. The<br />

independent audit completed in June <strong>2011</strong><br />

concluded WCPL lighting did meet the requirements<br />

of AS4282.<br />

During this reporting period there were no<br />

community complaints in relation to lighting,<br />

compared to five complaints reported to WCPL in<br />

the previous <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting period. The reduction<br />

in complaints is largely due to change in procedures<br />

implemented by WCPL and completion of mining<br />

activities in the vicinity of the Rug Dump.<br />

3.13 Cultural and Natural<br />

Heritage Conservation<br />

3.13.1 Aboriginal Heritage<br />

3.13.1.1 Environmental Management<br />

Archaeology and Cultural Heritage is managed in<br />

accordance with the National Parks and Wildlife Act<br />

1974 (NPW Act), the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage<br />

Consultation Requirements for Proponents 2010<br />

(ACHCRs) and the Environmental Planning and<br />

Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). The NPW Act<br />

provides protection for Aboriginal objects or places,<br />

while the EP&A Act ensures that Aboriginal cultural<br />

heritage is properly assessed in land use planning<br />

and development. The NPW Act provides statutory<br />

protection for all Aboriginal heritage, places and<br />

objects with penalties levied for breaches of the Act.<br />

This legislation is overseen by the Office of<br />

Environment and Heritage (OEH). Part 6 of this Act<br />

is the relevant part concerned with Aboriginal<br />

objects and places, with Section 86, 87, 89A and<br />

Section 90 being the most pertinent.<br />

The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation<br />

Requirements for Proponents (ACHCR’s) were<br />

issued by OEH on 12th April 2010. These<br />

consultation requirements generally replace the<br />

previously issued Interim Community Consultation<br />

Requirements (ICCR) for Applicants (DEC 2004).<br />

The ACHCR guidelines apply to all AHIP<br />

applications prepared after 12th April 2010. For<br />

projects commenced before the 12th April 2010,<br />

Section 1 (Q1) of the transitional arrangements<br />

indicates that if Aboriginal consultation was<br />

commenced prior to the 12th April 2010 (including<br />

advertising and notification of stakeholders), then<br />

consultation is to be continued under the previous<br />

ICCR guidelines.<br />

Aboriginal heritage sites within the WCPL mining<br />

leases were identified and assessed during the<br />

2003 EIS. The location of sites is shown on Figure<br />

3.21.<br />

The WCPL Surface Disturbance Permit (SDP)<br />

process requires the location of the proposed<br />

disturbance to be checked, to ensure that an<br />

archaeological and heritage assessment has been<br />

conducted and that any Aboriginal artefacts or<br />

objects likely to be impacted upon have been<br />

salvaged in accordance with the relevant permits<br />

issued under the NPW Act, or are protected from<br />

disturbance.<br />

OEH released a publication entitled Due Diligence<br />

Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal<br />

Objects in New South Wales on 24th September<br />

2010. This Code of Practice was developed with the<br />

express intention of satisfying the due diligence<br />

requirement contained within s87(2) of the NPW Act<br />

1974. In September 2010, the NSW Minerals<br />

Council released a publication entitled NSW<br />

Minerals Industry Due Diligence Code of Practice<br />

for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects which is a<br />

recognised industry specific code of practice. Due<br />

diligence inspection relates to the physical<br />

identification of Aboriginal objects. Community<br />

consultation is only required once Aboriginal objects<br />

have been detected and if an Aboriginal Heritage<br />

Impact Permit (AHIP) is deemed necessary. The<br />

OEH due diligence requirements are described as<br />

the minimum standard of care required, however, it<br />

is noted within that Code of Practice that any<br />

industry-specific due diligence procedures of a<br />

higher standard should be followed instead.<br />

3.13.1.2 Environmental Performance<br />

A Section 87/ 90 Permit (#2222) (now known as an<br />

Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit) was issued to<br />

WCPL by the DEC (later DECCW and now OEH)<br />

under the NPW Act on 20 June 2005. In<br />

consultation with the DECCW and local Aboriginal<br />

groups, the DECCW granted approval to extend the<br />

permit for an additional 5 years, expiring on the 19<br />

June 2015.<br />

Ongoing artefact analysis works associated with the<br />

salvage programme were conducted during the<br />

reporting period in accordance with the<br />

requirements under Permit #2222. The salvage<br />

programme targeted sites in the approved Open Cut<br />

disturbance area.<br />

The arrangements for the salvage operation<br />

followed the Interim Community Consultation<br />

Guidelines (ICCG) issued by the DEC in 2004. All<br />

respondents to the ICCG process attended a site<br />

induction at WCPL on 12 February 2009. The<br />

members of the Wonnarua Aboriginal Community<br />

Page 72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!