Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />
Australian Standard AS4282 (INT) 1995 – Control of<br />
Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting. The<br />
independent audit completed in June <strong>2011</strong><br />
concluded WCPL lighting did meet the requirements<br />
of AS4282.<br />
During this reporting period there were no<br />
community complaints in relation to lighting,<br />
compared to five complaints reported to WCPL in<br />
the previous <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting period. The reduction<br />
in complaints is largely due to change in procedures<br />
implemented by WCPL and completion of mining<br />
activities in the vicinity of the Rug Dump.<br />
3.13 Cultural and Natural<br />
Heritage Conservation<br />
3.13.1 Aboriginal Heritage<br />
3.13.1.1 Environmental Management<br />
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage is managed in<br />
accordance with the National Parks and Wildlife Act<br />
1974 (NPW Act), the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage<br />
Consultation Requirements for Proponents 2010<br />
(ACHCRs) and the Environmental Planning and<br />
Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). The NPW Act<br />
provides protection for Aboriginal objects or places,<br />
while the EP&A Act ensures that Aboriginal cultural<br />
heritage is properly assessed in land use planning<br />
and development. The NPW Act provides statutory<br />
protection for all Aboriginal heritage, places and<br />
objects with penalties levied for breaches of the Act.<br />
This legislation is overseen by the Office of<br />
Environment and Heritage (OEH). Part 6 of this Act<br />
is the relevant part concerned with Aboriginal<br />
objects and places, with Section 86, 87, 89A and<br />
Section 90 being the most pertinent.<br />
The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation<br />
Requirements for Proponents (ACHCR’s) were<br />
issued by OEH on 12th April 2010. These<br />
consultation requirements generally replace the<br />
previously issued Interim Community Consultation<br />
Requirements (ICCR) for Applicants (DEC 2004).<br />
The ACHCR guidelines apply to all AHIP<br />
applications prepared after 12th April 2010. For<br />
projects commenced before the 12th April 2010,<br />
Section 1 (Q1) of the transitional arrangements<br />
indicates that if Aboriginal consultation was<br />
commenced prior to the 12th April 2010 (including<br />
advertising and notification of stakeholders), then<br />
consultation is to be continued under the previous<br />
ICCR guidelines.<br />
Aboriginal heritage sites within the WCPL mining<br />
leases were identified and assessed during the<br />
2003 EIS. The location of sites is shown on Figure<br />
3.21.<br />
The WCPL Surface Disturbance Permit (SDP)<br />
process requires the location of the proposed<br />
disturbance to be checked, to ensure that an<br />
archaeological and heritage assessment has been<br />
conducted and that any Aboriginal artefacts or<br />
objects likely to be impacted upon have been<br />
salvaged in accordance with the relevant permits<br />
issued under the NPW Act, or are protected from<br />
disturbance.<br />
OEH released a publication entitled Due Diligence<br />
Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal<br />
Objects in New South Wales on 24th September<br />
2010. This Code of Practice was developed with the<br />
express intention of satisfying the due diligence<br />
requirement contained within s87(2) of the NPW Act<br />
1974. In September 2010, the NSW Minerals<br />
Council released a publication entitled NSW<br />
Minerals Industry Due Diligence Code of Practice<br />
for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects which is a<br />
recognised industry specific code of practice. Due<br />
diligence inspection relates to the physical<br />
identification of Aboriginal objects. Community<br />
consultation is only required once Aboriginal objects<br />
have been detected and if an Aboriginal Heritage<br />
Impact Permit (AHIP) is deemed necessary. The<br />
OEH due diligence requirements are described as<br />
the minimum standard of care required, however, it<br />
is noted within that Code of Practice that any<br />
industry-specific due diligence procedures of a<br />
higher standard should be followed instead.<br />
3.13.1.2 Environmental Performance<br />
A Section 87/ 90 Permit (#2222) (now known as an<br />
Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit) was issued to<br />
WCPL by the DEC (later DECCW and now OEH)<br />
under the NPW Act on 20 June 2005. In<br />
consultation with the DECCW and local Aboriginal<br />
groups, the DECCW granted approval to extend the<br />
permit for an additional 5 years, expiring on the 19<br />
June 2015.<br />
Ongoing artefact analysis works associated with the<br />
salvage programme were conducted during the<br />
reporting period in accordance with the<br />
requirements under Permit #2222. The salvage<br />
programme targeted sites in the approved Open Cut<br />
disturbance area.<br />
The arrangements for the salvage operation<br />
followed the Interim Community Consultation<br />
Guidelines (ICCG) issued by the DEC in 2004. All<br />
respondents to the ICCG process attended a site<br />
induction at WCPL on 12 February 2009. The<br />
members of the Wonnarua Aboriginal Community<br />
Page 72