01.11.2014 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />

3.11.2 Environmental Performance<br />

Real Time Noise Monitoring<br />

WCPL compile quarterly reports on monitoring data<br />

from four fixed SentineX continuous noise<br />

monitoring systems adjacent to WCPL. Below is a<br />

summary of the quarterly reports for real time noise<br />

monitoring during the reporting period.<br />

Q1- July to September <strong>2011</strong><br />

Assessment of noise impacts for the July to<br />

September, <strong>2011</strong>, monitoring period indicates that<br />

WCM complied with the noise level criteria<br />

prescribed in the <strong>Wambo</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> NMP. Review of the<br />

L A1,1minute results indicates that animal noise, road<br />

noise and meteorological influences dominate the<br />

LA1 noise environment adjacent to the WCM.<br />

Mining noise was encountered during audio review<br />

at the N21 (WA) and N16 (Muller) site locations.<br />

However, this was considered to represent only the<br />

background contribution to measured noise levels<br />

rather than the transient or peak events associated<br />

with potential for sleep disturbance. It should be<br />

noted that the N16 (Muller) monitoring location is<br />

subject to cumulative mining noise impacts, and as<br />

the source of mine noise contributions could not be<br />

confirmed, exceedences could not be attributed to<br />

the WCM.<br />

Where mining noise impacts were observed,<br />

uncertainty exists in the validity of the monitoring<br />

data. While EPL 529 excludes data influenced by<br />

strong temperature inversions (lapse rates of<br />

3 C/100m and wind speeds up to 2 m/s), the<br />

methods available to assess atmospheric stability<br />

(sigma-theta method) provide conflicting evaluation<br />

as to the validity of the noise monitoring data.<br />

Pasquill Gifford (P-G) ‘F’ class stability was<br />

commonly observed during the monitoring period,<br />

denoting temperature lapse rates of between +1.5<br />

and +4.0 deg/C per 100m. It stands to reason that<br />

portions of the dataset monitored under ‘F’ class<br />

stability conditions would be subject to lapse rates in<br />

excess of 3.0 deg/C per 100m; however, in the<br />

absence of available methods or data, the<br />

frequency of this scenario could not be determined.<br />

Consequently, all noise monitoring results observed<br />

under ‘F’ class conditions were retained in the<br />

analysis.<br />

October to December, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Assessment of continuous noise monitoring data<br />

indicated that the WCM complied with the<br />

L AeqLF,15minute noise level criteria for more than 88%<br />

of time at the N21 (WA) monitoring location and<br />

98% of the time at the N20 (Thelander) monitoring<br />

location. Following a conservative detailed analysis<br />

of the N16 (Muller) monitoring data, it was found<br />

that L AeqLF,15minute noise levels attributable to WCM<br />

operations exceeded the 40dB(A) criteria<br />

approximately 22% of the monitoring period. The<br />

measured exceedence rate attributable to all<br />

environmental noise sources at this location was<br />

approximately 48%.<br />

Mine noise was audible at both the N21 (WA) and<br />

N16 (Muller) sites; however, it was found to<br />

comprise the background noise contribution for a<br />

majority of these events. Meteorological influences<br />

were also observed to contribute to measured noise<br />

levels at these locations, and the passage of<br />

vehicles on the Golden Highway was the dominant<br />

noise impact at the N16 (Muller) monitoring location.<br />

January to March, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Measured noise levels were found to comply with<br />

the L Aeq,15minute criteria more than 90% of the time at<br />

the N21 (WA) monitoring location and 94% of the<br />

time at the N20 (Thelander) monitoring location.<br />

These results are consistent with those obtained in<br />

the previous (October to December (<strong>2011</strong>)) period.<br />

Analysis of monitoring results, including WCM<br />

meteorological station data, demonstrates that lower<br />

rates of night time temperature inversions were<br />

observed as compared to the winter months. This<br />

indicates that the WCM site may be less affected by<br />

enhanced noise propagation associated with<br />

temperature inversions in the summer months,<br />

resulting in a higher rate of compliance with the<br />

performance criteria.<br />

Results of L Aeq,15minute audio review indicate that<br />

mining noise impacts were present during the<br />

January to March (<strong>2012</strong>) period; however,<br />

environmental sources (including insects, livestock,<br />

road noise and meteorological impacts) were found<br />

to dominate the night time noise environment.<br />

April to June, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Assessment of continuous noise monitoring data<br />

indicated that the WCM complied with the<br />

L AeqLF,15minute noise level criteria for more than 83%<br />

of time at the N21 (WA) monitoring location and<br />

92% of the time at the N20 (Thelander) monitoring<br />

location. Moderate (F class) and strong (G class)<br />

temperature inversions (conditions under which<br />

enhanced noise propagation may occur) were found<br />

to be present for 36% of the night time monitoring<br />

period from April to June. These inversion events<br />

typically generate meteorological conditions under<br />

which enhanced noise propagation may occur.<br />

Comparison of the measured L AeqLF,15minute noise<br />

level result distributions indicates that noise levels<br />

above the relevant criteria may be observed with<br />

higher frequency during the winter months.<br />

Audio review suggested that mine noise was<br />

present at both the N21 (WA) and N16 (Muller)<br />

sites; however, environmental noise sources<br />

(including road noise, insects and meteorological<br />

impacts) were found to dominate the night time<br />

noise environment. The passage of vehicles on the<br />

Golden Highway was the dominant noise impact at<br />

the N16 (Muller) monitoring location. Mining noise<br />

was not observed to contribute to measured Sleep<br />

Page 70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!