01.11.2014 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />

The vertebrate pest management program involved<br />

1080 baiting, targeting wild dogs (Canis lupus<br />

familiaris) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). The program<br />

was run in conjunction with the Livestock Health and<br />

Pest Authority and surrounding mining operations.<br />

Figure 1 Illustrates the general area targeted for dog<br />

baiting in its regional context.<br />

The vertebrate pest management program proved<br />

extremely successful with at least one bait taken<br />

from 88% (or 41 of the 47 sites) of the baiting sites<br />

established. A further 6% (3 of the 47 sites) of the<br />

sites had been disturbed by dog activity although no<br />

baits were actually taken from these sites, leaving<br />

only three sites (6%) where baits were not taken<br />

and sites were not disturbed at all. Fifty four percent<br />

of all the baits taken showed evidence of being<br />

consumed by dogs of various sizes, 43% were<br />

taken by foxes, with the remaining 3% taken by<br />

other non targeted vertebrate species.<br />

3.9.3 Remnant Woodland<br />

Enhancement Program<br />

The results of the vertebrate pest control program<br />

within the RWEP areas are described in Section<br />

3.9.2.<br />

3.10 Blasting and Vibration<br />

3.10.1 Environmental Management<br />

Open cut blasting activities are conducted by Dyno<br />

Nobel and monitoring is conducted by WCPL<br />

personnel using a network of permanent blast<br />

monitors located on site and on neighbouring<br />

properties surrounding WCPL (Figure 3.1). Blast<br />

monitoring was conducted at four locations around<br />

the mine during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> reporting period.<br />

The locations of these blast monitors are as agreed<br />

by the OEH and satisfy WCPL’s regulatory<br />

requirements in relation to blast monitoring.<br />

EPL 529 also permits WCPL’s blasting operations a<br />

maximum of 120 dB(L) and requires less than 5% of<br />

total blasts exceed 115 dB(L) at any non-mine<br />

owned residential location (Table 3.10).<br />

Table 3.10 WCPL Overpressure Criteria<br />

Airblast overpressure<br />

level<br />

Allowable exceedance<br />

(dB(Lin Peak))<br />

5% of the total number of blast over a<br />

115<br />

period of 12 months<br />

120 0%<br />

than 5% of total blasts exceed 5 mm/second at any<br />

non-mine owned residential locations.<br />

Table 3.11 WCPL Ground Vibration Criteria<br />

Peak particle velocity<br />

Allowable exceedance<br />

(mm/s)<br />

5% of the total number of blast over a<br />

5<br />

period of 12 months<br />

10 0%<br />

Every blast is designed with consideration for<br />

vibration and overpressure impacts of blasting on<br />

our neighbours, including the Underground<br />

operations. In addition to the blast designs, a<br />

blasting protocol is in place which prevents blasting<br />

during weather conditions which may adversely<br />

affect neighbours. The wind criteria of the blasting<br />

protocol were modified following an incident in<br />

January 2007.<br />

Prior to each blast, both wind speed and wind<br />

direction are continually assessed in accordance<br />

with WCPL blasting guidelines.<br />

3.10.2 Environmental Performance<br />

3.10.2.1 Blast Monitoring<br />

There were a total of 76 blasts in the open cut<br />

during the reporting period. All 76 blasts were<br />

monitored with a 93.4% capture rate. During<br />

November <strong>2011</strong> WCPL experienced technical<br />

issues with the downloading of the data resulting in<br />

no available vibration data for November <strong>2011</strong>. As a<br />

result WCPL immediately reviewed the procedures<br />

and monitoring system and as a result engaged an<br />

external consultancy firm in December <strong>2011</strong> to<br />

download, maintain and verify the data. To date<br />

there have been no repeat incidents with 100%<br />

capture rate.<br />

The blast results for each of the four monitors are<br />

illustrated in Figure 3.20 and are provided in<br />

Appendix 2E.<br />

There was only one blast at WCPL during the<br />

reporting period recording levels above 115 dB(L) at<br />

blast monitors located at various sensitive<br />

receptors. On the 13/10/<strong>2011</strong> BM05 recorded an<br />

overpressure of 118.5dB(L), however WCPL was<br />

able to meet the 5% of total blasts exceeding 115<br />

dB(L), with the total of 1% of blasts not achieving<br />

the 115 dB(L) criteria.<br />

No blasts exceeded the 120 dB(L) limit during the<br />

reporting period.<br />

EPL 529 permits WCPL a maximum ground<br />

vibration of 10 mm/second and requires that less<br />

Page 66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!