Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />
The vertebrate pest management program involved<br />
1080 baiting, targeting wild dogs (Canis lupus<br />
familiaris) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). The program<br />
was run in conjunction with the Livestock Health and<br />
Pest Authority and surrounding mining operations.<br />
Figure 1 Illustrates the general area targeted for dog<br />
baiting in its regional context.<br />
The vertebrate pest management program proved<br />
extremely successful with at least one bait taken<br />
from 88% (or 41 of the 47 sites) of the baiting sites<br />
established. A further 6% (3 of the 47 sites) of the<br />
sites had been disturbed by dog activity although no<br />
baits were actually taken from these sites, leaving<br />
only three sites (6%) where baits were not taken<br />
and sites were not disturbed at all. Fifty four percent<br />
of all the baits taken showed evidence of being<br />
consumed by dogs of various sizes, 43% were<br />
taken by foxes, with the remaining 3% taken by<br />
other non targeted vertebrate species.<br />
3.9.3 Remnant Woodland<br />
Enhancement Program<br />
The results of the vertebrate pest control program<br />
within the RWEP areas are described in Section<br />
3.9.2.<br />
3.10 Blasting and Vibration<br />
3.10.1 Environmental Management<br />
Open cut blasting activities are conducted by Dyno<br />
Nobel and monitoring is conducted by WCPL<br />
personnel using a network of permanent blast<br />
monitors located on site and on neighbouring<br />
properties surrounding WCPL (Figure 3.1). Blast<br />
monitoring was conducted at four locations around<br />
the mine during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> reporting period.<br />
The locations of these blast monitors are as agreed<br />
by the OEH and satisfy WCPL’s regulatory<br />
requirements in relation to blast monitoring.<br />
EPL 529 also permits WCPL’s blasting operations a<br />
maximum of 120 dB(L) and requires less than 5% of<br />
total blasts exceed 115 dB(L) at any non-mine<br />
owned residential location (Table 3.10).<br />
Table 3.10 WCPL Overpressure Criteria<br />
Airblast overpressure<br />
level<br />
Allowable exceedance<br />
(dB(Lin Peak))<br />
5% of the total number of blast over a<br />
115<br />
period of 12 months<br />
120 0%<br />
than 5% of total blasts exceed 5 mm/second at any<br />
non-mine owned residential locations.<br />
Table 3.11 WCPL Ground Vibration Criteria<br />
Peak particle velocity<br />
Allowable exceedance<br />
(mm/s)<br />
5% of the total number of blast over a<br />
5<br />
period of 12 months<br />
10 0%<br />
Every blast is designed with consideration for<br />
vibration and overpressure impacts of blasting on<br />
our neighbours, including the Underground<br />
operations. In addition to the blast designs, a<br />
blasting protocol is in place which prevents blasting<br />
during weather conditions which may adversely<br />
affect neighbours. The wind criteria of the blasting<br />
protocol were modified following an incident in<br />
January 2007.<br />
Prior to each blast, both wind speed and wind<br />
direction are continually assessed in accordance<br />
with WCPL blasting guidelines.<br />
3.10.2 Environmental Performance<br />
3.10.2.1 Blast Monitoring<br />
There were a total of 76 blasts in the open cut<br />
during the reporting period. All 76 blasts were<br />
monitored with a 93.4% capture rate. During<br />
November <strong>2011</strong> WCPL experienced technical<br />
issues with the downloading of the data resulting in<br />
no available vibration data for November <strong>2011</strong>. As a<br />
result WCPL immediately reviewed the procedures<br />
and monitoring system and as a result engaged an<br />
external consultancy firm in December <strong>2011</strong> to<br />
download, maintain and verify the data. To date<br />
there have been no repeat incidents with 100%<br />
capture rate.<br />
The blast results for each of the four monitors are<br />
illustrated in Figure 3.20 and are provided in<br />
Appendix 2E.<br />
There was only one blast at WCPL during the<br />
reporting period recording levels above 115 dB(L) at<br />
blast monitors located at various sensitive<br />
receptors. On the 13/10/<strong>2011</strong> BM05 recorded an<br />
overpressure of 118.5dB(L), however WCPL was<br />
able to meet the 5% of total blasts exceeding 115<br />
dB(L), with the total of 1% of blasts not achieving<br />
the 115 dB(L) criteria.<br />
No blasts exceeded the 120 dB(L) limit during the<br />
reporting period.<br />
EPL 529 permits WCPL a maximum ground<br />
vibration of 10 mm/second and requires that less<br />
Page 66