01.11.2014 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />

3.4.2.4 Electrical Conductivity and Total<br />

Dissolved Solids<br />

Monitoring of EC and TDS during the reporting<br />

period of the natural creek water systems varied<br />

depending on the volumetric flows within these<br />

creek systems. This relationship between EC<br />

concentrations and flow can been seen from<br />

monitoring data at both gauging stations within the<br />

Wollombi Brook 8 (Appendix 2C).<br />

The EC and TDS concentrations within the mine<br />

water system typically depends on the quality of the<br />

fresh water added to the system and the mine water<br />

pumped around site. EC and TDS results recorded<br />

during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> reporting period are<br />

graphically presented and tabulated in Appendix<br />

2C.<br />

Wollombi Brook recorded average EC values of<br />

408S/cm, 458S/cm, 425S/cm and 450S/cm at<br />

surface water monitoring sites SW01, SW02, SW03<br />

and SW40 respectively. The annual average EC<br />

concentrations for Wollombi Brook during the <strong>2011</strong>-<br />

<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting period were lower compared<br />

to the average EC concentrations recorded in the<br />

previous 2010-<strong>2011</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong>. The relationship<br />

between the lower EC concentrations and water<br />

flows in Wollombi brook is displayed in Appendix<br />

2C.<br />

All monthly recorded EC values during <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

were within the SWMP surface water quality criteria,<br />

in contrast with the results from SW03 during the<br />

2009-2010 <strong>AEMR</strong>. During the 2009-2010 reporting<br />

period there were five occasions at SW05 where the<br />

EC criteria was not achieved due to low flows in the<br />

brook. However, the Wollombi Brook sustained<br />

good flows during this reporting period, resulting in<br />

lower EC concentrations.<br />

South <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek and Stony Creek recorded<br />

average EC values of 439S/cm, 547S/cm and<br />

346mg/L at surface water monitoring sites SW06,<br />

SW07 and SW08 respectively. All annual average<br />

EC concentrations for South <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek and<br />

Stony Creek during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting<br />

period were comparable to the average EC<br />

concentrations recorded in the previous 2010-<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>AEMR</strong>.<br />

All monthly recorded EC values during <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />

were within the SWMP surface water quality criteria<br />

for SW06, SW07 and SW08. During the previous<br />

2010-<strong>2011</strong> reporting period the monthly EC criterion<br />

was not achieved on several occasions at SW06<br />

and SW07. Both SW06 and SW07 are upstream of<br />

8 Data supplied by the NSW Office of Water<br />

WCPL mining operation and therefore considered<br />

outside the influence of mining.<br />

North <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek average EC values of<br />

430S/cm, 1627S/cm and 280mg/L at surface<br />

water monitoring sites SW27, SW05 and SW04<br />

respectively. Monthly EC concentrations for North<br />

<strong>Wambo</strong> Creek at SW27, SW05 and SW04 during<br />

the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting achieved the criteria<br />

for EC. On comparisons to the previous reporting<br />

period EC results at SW05 did not meet the EC<br />

criteria of 2140S/cm for August 2010 and<br />

September 2010.<br />

EC concentrations at SW39 achieved the water<br />

quality criteria of 492mg/L during the reporting<br />

period. On comparisons to the previous reporting<br />

period EC results at SW39 did not meet the EC<br />

criteria on several occasions. SW39 is to the north<br />

west of the operations where grazing activities occur<br />

on WCPL land under a private lease arrangement<br />

and therefore considered outside the influences<br />

from mining.<br />

Results from the WRD water monitoring program<br />

show that EC in the Wollombi Brook achieved the<br />

EC criteria.<br />

As discussed above, surface water sites at Longford<br />

Creek (SW43 and SW44) are adjacent to the<br />

Golden Highway and considered outside the<br />

influence of any WCPL activities. Additionally<br />

surface water sites at Doctors Creek (SW46 and<br />

SW45) are immediately downstream from non<br />

WCPL agricultural and mining activities, including<br />

cattle grazing and coal stockpiling.<br />

Doctors Creek also provides for the passage of<br />

mine water discharged from a neighbouring mine to<br />

the Hunter River. During the reporting period there<br />

were a number of visual confirmations that several<br />

discharges to Doctors Creek were being<br />

undertaken. The high EC periodically recorded at<br />

Doctors Creek is consistent with these events.<br />

3.4.2.5 Oil and Grease<br />

Oil and grease results recorded during the reporting<br />

period concluded that oil and grease concentrations<br />

in the surrounding waters were generally in<br />

compliance with the criteria set out in the WRD<br />

SWMP. Oil and grease results recorded during the<br />

2010-<strong>2011</strong> reporting period are tabulated in<br />

Appendix 2C.<br />

3.4.2.6 Flow Monitoring<br />

In consultation with NOW, WCPL completed a<br />

program to re-install all nine surface water flow sites<br />

destroyed during the June 2007 floods. The<br />

Page 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!