Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong><br />
3.4.2.4 Electrical Conductivity and Total<br />
Dissolved Solids<br />
Monitoring of EC and TDS during the reporting<br />
period of the natural creek water systems varied<br />
depending on the volumetric flows within these<br />
creek systems. This relationship between EC<br />
concentrations and flow can been seen from<br />
monitoring data at both gauging stations within the<br />
Wollombi Brook 8 (Appendix 2C).<br />
The EC and TDS concentrations within the mine<br />
water system typically depends on the quality of the<br />
fresh water added to the system and the mine water<br />
pumped around site. EC and TDS results recorded<br />
during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> reporting period are<br />
graphically presented and tabulated in Appendix<br />
2C.<br />
Wollombi Brook recorded average EC values of<br />
408S/cm, 458S/cm, 425S/cm and 450S/cm at<br />
surface water monitoring sites SW01, SW02, SW03<br />
and SW40 respectively. The annual average EC<br />
concentrations for Wollombi Brook during the <strong>2011</strong>-<br />
<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting period were lower compared<br />
to the average EC concentrations recorded in the<br />
previous 2010-<strong>2011</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong>. The relationship<br />
between the lower EC concentrations and water<br />
flows in Wollombi brook is displayed in Appendix<br />
2C.<br />
All monthly recorded EC values during <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
were within the SWMP surface water quality criteria,<br />
in contrast with the results from SW03 during the<br />
2009-2010 <strong>AEMR</strong>. During the 2009-2010 reporting<br />
period there were five occasions at SW05 where the<br />
EC criteria was not achieved due to low flows in the<br />
brook. However, the Wollombi Brook sustained<br />
good flows during this reporting period, resulting in<br />
lower EC concentrations.<br />
South <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek and Stony Creek recorded<br />
average EC values of 439S/cm, 547S/cm and<br />
346mg/L at surface water monitoring sites SW06,<br />
SW07 and SW08 respectively. All annual average<br />
EC concentrations for South <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek and<br />
Stony Creek during the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting<br />
period were comparable to the average EC<br />
concentrations recorded in the previous 2010-<strong>2011</strong><br />
<strong>AEMR</strong>.<br />
All monthly recorded EC values during <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong><br />
were within the SWMP surface water quality criteria<br />
for SW06, SW07 and SW08. During the previous<br />
2010-<strong>2011</strong> reporting period the monthly EC criterion<br />
was not achieved on several occasions at SW06<br />
and SW07. Both SW06 and SW07 are upstream of<br />
8 Data supplied by the NSW Office of Water<br />
WCPL mining operation and therefore considered<br />
outside the influence of mining.<br />
North <strong>Wambo</strong> Creek average EC values of<br />
430S/cm, 1627S/cm and 280mg/L at surface<br />
water monitoring sites SW27, SW05 and SW04<br />
respectively. Monthly EC concentrations for North<br />
<strong>Wambo</strong> Creek at SW27, SW05 and SW04 during<br />
the <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong> reporting achieved the criteria<br />
for EC. On comparisons to the previous reporting<br />
period EC results at SW05 did not meet the EC<br />
criteria of 2140S/cm for August 2010 and<br />
September 2010.<br />
EC concentrations at SW39 achieved the water<br />
quality criteria of 492mg/L during the reporting<br />
period. On comparisons to the previous reporting<br />
period EC results at SW39 did not meet the EC<br />
criteria on several occasions. SW39 is to the north<br />
west of the operations where grazing activities occur<br />
on WCPL land under a private lease arrangement<br />
and therefore considered outside the influences<br />
from mining.<br />
Results from the WRD water monitoring program<br />
show that EC in the Wollombi Brook achieved the<br />
EC criteria.<br />
As discussed above, surface water sites at Longford<br />
Creek (SW43 and SW44) are adjacent to the<br />
Golden Highway and considered outside the<br />
influence of any WCPL activities. Additionally<br />
surface water sites at Doctors Creek (SW46 and<br />
SW45) are immediately downstream from non<br />
WCPL agricultural and mining activities, including<br />
cattle grazing and coal stockpiling.<br />
Doctors Creek also provides for the passage of<br />
mine water discharged from a neighbouring mine to<br />
the Hunter River. During the reporting period there<br />
were a number of visual confirmations that several<br />
discharges to Doctors Creek were being<br />
undertaken. The high EC periodically recorded at<br />
Doctors Creek is consistent with these events.<br />
3.4.2.5 Oil and Grease<br />
Oil and grease results recorded during the reporting<br />
period concluded that oil and grease concentrations<br />
in the surrounding waters were generally in<br />
compliance with the criteria set out in the WRD<br />
SWMP. Oil and grease results recorded during the<br />
2010-<strong>2011</strong> reporting period are tabulated in<br />
Appendix 2C.<br />
3.4.2.6 Flow Monitoring<br />
In consultation with NOW, WCPL completed a<br />
program to re-install all nine surface water flow sites<br />
destroyed during the June 2007 floods. The<br />
Page 52