01.11.2014 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<br />

2.2.3 KITCHEN WING<br />

Results for the first floor of the Kitchen Wing, recorded on 17/2/<strong>2012</strong>, are scheduled in a similar manner in Table 2.<br />

Event ident.<br />

Channel<br />

no.<br />

Table 2 – Kitchen Wing first floor 17/2/<strong>2012</strong><br />

Orientation Max ‘a’, Max ‘v’, Max. ‘s’, mm<br />

mm/s² mm/s<br />

Dominant<br />

frequency,<br />

Hz<br />

Kitchen Wing 1 N-S 845 13.1 0.31 10 10<br />

2 E-W: 1 184 3.9 0.25 12 2.7<br />

3 E-W: 2 220 3.8 0.13 10 2.6<br />

Velocity<br />

amplification<br />

in building<br />

Grounds N-S 1.31 11<br />

E-W 1.47 12<br />

V 0.84 NA<br />

Reference to the spectrogram plots helps explain the different levels of amplification from what was experienced<br />

in the house. In particular, the vibration of the chimney was quite low, indicating that resonance did not occur; the<br />

north-south side wall did seem to get some resonance, as seen by the distinct pulses in the spectrogram, but other<br />

frequencies were present as seen by the smearing. The most distinct movement was for the N-S direction, which is<br />

likely to have been attributable to the movement in the end wall of building; the frequency correlating with what might<br />

have been expected from the building as a whole would be up to 5 Hz.<br />

3 CONCLUSIONS<br />

3.1 Vibration vulnerability<br />

Vibration monitoring during blast events in representative rooms in the New House and Kitchen Wing at <strong>Wambo</strong><br />

Homestead has shown that effects on the buildings are related to the frequencies in the blast wave. In particular, it was<br />

observed that the buildings are most vulnerable to damage when the blast wave contains frequencies in the 10 Hz to<br />

15 Hz range.<br />

3.2 Scope for blast design adjustments to reduce vulnerability<br />

Adjusting detonator delays and blast patterns has the potential for controlling the frequency distribution within the<br />

blast wave. If, in the future, blasts critical to <strong>Wambo</strong> Homestead were be designed to have frequencies below 8 Hz<br />

and greater than (say) 16 Hz, then the potential for damage, particularly to plaster ceilings, could be greatly reduced.<br />

With suitable blast design this could allow substantially increased blast sizes without any greater risk of damage to the<br />

buildings.<br />

J.W. Jordan FIEAust CPEng<br />

NPER Structural & Conservation Reg. No. 161488<br />

April <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>Wambo</strong> Homestead<br />

Vibration vulnerability<br />

April <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!